|
04:11
MasterDuke left
07:52
sena_kun joined
|
|||
| ab5tract | say I've added a new field in a struct (`MVMIOFileData`): how do I actually bubble this new information up into NQP / Rakudo? | 15:49 | |
| lizmat | Bump MoarVM in NQP and then Bump NQP in Rakudo ? | 15:50 | |
| ab5tract | My guess is that a new function is required in MoarVM, which is then exposed to QAST via MAST, and then a new nqp::* on top to access it? | ||
| lizmat: if it's that simple I will be very happy indeed :D | |||
| lizmat | I guess nqp::filemode, looking at nqp::fileislink / filereadable / filewritable implementations ? | 15:51 | |
| ab5tract | excellent | 15:55 | |
| a bit surprised that none of those take BOOTIO, but they're great starting points | |||
| nine | New syscall most likely | 16:14 | |
| That will be available in Rakudo directly with no NQP changes required | 16:15 | ||
| See stat-is-readable and friends | 16:17 | ||
| ab5tract | ah, it looks like the issue at hand (R#1373) can be solved in a simpler manner without leaving MoarVM... but the question is, do we want a way for HLLs to access the requested open modes? | ||
| linkable6 | R#1373 [closed]: github.com/rakudo/rakudo/issues/1373 [LTA] LTA error when trying to exclusive-lock a read-only IO::Handle | ||
| ab5tract | oops, nevermind. it requires a combination of the mode + the arguments to lock, so the mission continues. thanks nine for the suggestion | 16:20 | |
| lizmat | and yet another Rakudo Weekly News hits the Net: rakudoweekly.blog/2024/05/13/2024-...nnouncing/ | 17:23 | |
| jnthn | nine: It's short for `class Foo { my $foo; method foo() { $foo } }` iirc | 18:11 | |
| Geth | MoarVM: ab5tract++ created pull request #1803: Provide some mechanisms for introspecting file mode |
18:13 | |
| ab5tract | it's a bit surprising to me that we don't have an `MVMbool` type that could be backed by a short (or C99's bool) | 21:01 | |
| feels a bit weird to stuff a single bit of information into an MVMint64, but maybe I'm holding something wrong? | 21:02 | ||
| (the sort-of-pun in that sentence was entirely unintentional :) | 21:03 | ||
| lizmat | could be very well that jnthn never felt the need for it | 21:10 | |
|
23:40
sena_kun left
|
|||