00:05 FROGGS joined 00:28 FROGGS joined 00:31 tokuhirom joined 00:38 kjs_ joined 01:16 FROGGS joined 01:24 zakharyas joined 01:45 leont joined
dalek arVM: f12d75e | timotimo++ | src/profiler/profile.c:
elide a few key-values from profiler data for default values
01:47
01:57 TimToady joined, colomon joined 02:33 tokuhirom joined 02:35 tokuhiro_ joined 02:38 lizmat_ joined 02:49 ilbot3 joined 03:57 FROGGS joined 04:34 tokuhirom joined 04:51 tokuhiro_ joined 06:36 tokuhirom joined 07:37 tokuhirom joined 08:19 domidumont joined 08:38 tokuhirom joined 08:39 vendethiel joined 09:41 kjs_ joined 09:58 tokuhiro_ joined 10:27 tokuhirom joined 10:49 tokuhiro_ joined 10:50 tokuhiro_ joined 11:33 tokuhirom joined 11:58 ggoebel joined 12:43 leont joined 13:30 ggoebel joined 13:35 tokuhirom joined 13:48 FROGGS_ joined 14:31 zakharyas joined 15:36 tokuhirom joined 16:06 tokuhiro_ joined 16:07 domidumont joined 17:26 colomon joined
timotimo we really must not forget the way substr misbehaves when an x'd piece of string is being acted upon 17:46
19:22 tokuhiro_ joined 19:45 vendethiel joined
nwc10 t/spec/S05-transliteration/trans.rakudo.moar can hang. twice now. stack backtrace looks like this paste.scsys.co.uk/500492 19:55
timotimo nwc10: can you give us a stacktrace with JIT disabled, too? 20:17
nwc10 um, yes, I don't know. And I probably need to try tomorrow.
timotimo thank you :)
because all those unreadable stack frames from the jit, you know 20:18
nwc10 as in, "I don't know if it will repeat without the JIT" - which I guess is the point of asking. And d'oh for not woring that one out myself.
timotimo also, perhaps a print MVM_dump_stacktrace (or what it's called) would be interesting
the fact that the stack contains a MVM_fixed_size_free confuses me 20:21
why would a jit frame get called from there?
20:34 tokuhirom joined 20:51 vendethiel joined 21:11 Peter_R joined 21:34 zakharyas joined 21:53 tokuhiro_ joined 22:26 lizmat joined 22:35 tokuhirom joined 23:07 leont joined 23:09 tokuhiro_ joined