|
01:24
TimToady joined
04:59
TimToady_ joined
06:10
domidumont joined
06:15
domidumont joined
07:04
japhb joined
07:19
rurban_ joined
07:22
FROGGS joined
08:15
domidumont joined
08:23
japhb joined
08:29
japhb joined
08:42
brrt joined
|
|||
| brrt | good * #moarvm | 08:46 | |
|
08:55
brrt joined
|
|||
| brrt | hmm, another idea... can't we share value descriptors between nodes | 09:23 | |
| hmm | 09:31 | ||
| actually, that brings us back to the array-of-things issue again | |||
| i'm fairly sure we can do better than that | |||
| maybe... | |||
| oh, i know | |||
| we keep value descriptors in an array | |||
| and keep an array of nodes to descriptors in the array | 09:32 | ||
| oh wait, we don't have to do the first thing | |||
| hmmmm.... | 09:33 | ||
| doing reverse lookup (from value descriptor to node) isn't actually ever necessary, i think | 09:35 | ||
| although | |||
| no, it is necessary, unfortunately | |||
| when we are spilling | |||
| hmm, i'll mull over this some more | 09:38 | ||
|
09:42
domidumont joined
|
|||
| FROGGS | o/ | 10:32 | |
| lizmat | FROGGS /o | 10:55 | |
|
11:17
dalek joined
|
|||
| jnthn | brrt++ # thinking :) | 11:20 | |
| timotimo | yeah, i think it's good, too | ||
|
11:50
lizmat joined
12:55
japhb joined
13:18
synopsebot6 joined
14:15
tomboy64 joined
14:41
rurban_ joined
14:52
colomon joined
16:23
domidumont joined
|
|||
| lizmat | jnthn: looks like RT #128522 indicates a casualty of the method cache refactor | 19:29 | |
| synopsebot6 | Link: rt.perl.org/rt3//Public/Bug/Displa...?id=128522 | ||
|
20:53
Ven joined
|
|||