|
00:43
patrickz_ joined
00:59
evalable6 joined
03:35
ilbot3 joined
05:10
reportable6 joined
09:29
domidumont joined
09:36
domidumont joined
10:39
reportable6 joined
10:49
reportable6 joined
10:50
reportable6 joined
10:52
reportable6 joined
|
|||
| nine | Oh boy... inline_in_place is completely broken after rebase on current master. On the "bright" side, it can be partly recovered by disabling the JIT | 14:07 | |
| jnthn | nine: I suggest going carefully through the exception changes I did - which in theory resolve a big problem that inline_in_place would have suffered | 14:24 | |
| I realized that moving the inlines to be in-place would break resolution of lexical handlers, because some that should not have been visible would become visible | 14:25 | ||
| Well, I realized this when looking into the problems introduced by letting lastexpayload be inlined | |||
| Which tripped over the issue anyway | 14:26 | ||
| Also there was a mechanism to try and resolve this but it was busted | 14:27 | ||
| The breakage hidden by refusing to inline lastexpayload | |||
|
14:30
domidumont joined
15:44
domidumont joined
17:38
patrickz joined
17:43
patrickz joined
17:49
patrickz_ joined
17:54
patrickz joined
17:59
patrickz joined
18:09
patrickz joined
18:14
patrickz joined
18:24
patrickz joined
18:36
patrickz_ joined
18:50
patrickz joined
18:59
patrickz_ joined
19:04
patrickz joined
19:14
patrickz joined
19:20
reportable6 joined
19:25
patrickz_ joined
19:30
patrickz joined
19:35
patrickz_ joined,
releasable6 joined
19:36
unicodable6 joined,
bisectable6 joined,
committable6 joined
20:11
patrickz joined
20:33
benchable6 joined
21:40
greppable6 joined
22:34
lizmat joined
|
|||