01:56
ilbot3 joined
03:42
vendethiel joined
05:07
vendethiel joined
05:36
vendethiel joined
06:19
FROGGS joined
06:26
colomon joined
06:39
vendethiel joined
07:08
Ven joined
07:13
zakharyas joined
07:19
brrt joined
|
|||
brrt | \o | 07:20 | |
i have a question with regards to tracing | 07:21 | ||
how to deal with invokish ops | |||
as in... they bring in some pain when we have the following | |||
(within a basic block): | |||
begin basic block -> foo -> bar -> invokish -> (enter frame) -> foo -> bar -> (leave frame) -> foo -> end of basic block | 07:22 | ||
or to be short, i think that invokish should be basic block boundaries for the purposes of inlining / tracing, even if they're not for the purposes of ssa calculations | 07:23 | ||
07:23
ShimmerFairy left
|
|||
jnthn | If we want to inline things the invokish ops would call then they'd need to be real BB boundaries. | 07:28 | |
brrt | yes, i think so too | 07:31 | |
(that took way more of my brain cycles this weekend than it should have :-)) | 07:32 | ||
08:11
donaldh joined
08:23
colomon joined
08:24
psch joined
08:55
Ven joined
10:43
rurban joined
11:21
Ven joined
11:23
vendethiel joined
|
|||
dalek | arVM: d8ee582 | FROGGS++ | / (2 files): Revert "enforce C99 compliance" This reverts commit 56dcbaa08c928a578c98f79b24e849b52706bd1f. We try to be C89 compliant to not accidently break MSVC. This hopefully also fixes #211. |
11:42 | |
11:58
colomon joined
12:04
dalek joined
|
|||
nwc10 | I CAN HAZ PRVLS UNKNWON BOOM! :-( | 12:10 | |
Stage parse : Internal error: invalid thread ID in GC work pass | |||
ASAN was quiet. | |||
timotimo | what's the right format specifier for a MVMuint32? | 12:12 | |
i'd just go with %d, to be honest | 12:13 | ||
but it could be wrong | |||
jnthn | eeks | 12:15 | |
nwc10: Would really like to hunt that one down... | |||
nwc10: If you've chane to investigate: in src/gc/worklist.h there is | 12:16 | ||
#define MVM_GC_WORKLIST_DEBUG_ADD 0 | |||
nwc10 | we got past it this time. | ||
jnthn | Flip that to a 1, breakpint MVM_panic, and see what's on the stack | ||
nwc10 | will finish this build, then change that thing | ||
dalek | arVM: f04b1d8 | timotimo++ | src/gc/collect.c: display exactly what thread ID was passed. |
12:46 | |
nwc10 | timotimo++ | 12:47 | |
oh yes, would like a 10+ year time machine | |||
fixed as many of these as I could in Perl 5 a few years back... | |||
if panincing/internal error/whatever, one has a printf() format - spew as much state as can be reliably sent through printf | 12:48 | ||
you won't get another chance to collect that info | |||
and, also, make the panic strings unique | |||
so that you know which line it was, unabigiously. | |||
13:01
nwc10 joined
|
|||
nwc10 | Stage mast : ASAN:SIGSEGV | 13:11 | |
================================================================= | |||
==31581==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x000000000000 (pc 0x7fb99317b777 sp 0x7fff8f48b770 bp 0x7fff8f48b7b0 T0) #0 0x7fb99317b776 in MVM_serialization_write_ref src/6model/serialization.c:617 #1 0x7fb99317f6fc in serialize_stable src/6model/serialization.c:987 #2 0x7fb9931818db in serialize src/6model/serialization.c:1228 | |||
#3 0x7fb99318287 in MVM_serialization_serialize src/6modela/serialization.c:1298 #4 0x7fb992fffa64 in MVM_interp_run src/core/interp.c:3447 #5 0x7fb99324f9f5 in MVM_vm_run_file src/moar.c:214 #6 0x401a1f in main src/main.c:189 | |||
oh, terminals hate everyone. | |||
no further info on why | 13:12 | ||
no idea if it's repeatable | |||
13:20
rurban joined
|
|||
nwc10 | not repeatable first time | 13:23 | |
13:36
brrt joined
|
|||
brrt | nwc10 - not entirely previously unknown, i have that one too | 13:44 | |
but only on a specific branch of rakudo | 13:45 | ||
timotimo: PRIu32 i'd say | 13:46 | ||
14:02
Ven joined
14:06
vendethiel joined
14:30
brrt` joined
15:37
FROGGS joined
15:44
moritz joined,
masak joined
16:30
vendethiel joined
16:37
rurban joined
17:10
vendethiel joined
18:22
zakharyas joined
18:37
rurban joined
|
|||
lizmat wonders whether blogs.perl.org/users/nick_wellnhofe...ength.html could be an inspiration for jnthn, or just old new :-) | 19:57 | ||
jnthn | lizmat: Cute :) | 20:24 | |
lizmat: Since we keep strings in NFG, we don't need to calculate the length for things like .chars. But I wonder if it's a way to make a faster UTF-8 decoder. Ours seems to cost some. | 20:25 | ||
21:08
dlem joined
|
|||
dlem | jnthn: bjoern.hoehrmann.de/utf-8/decoder/dfa/ | 21:08 | |
jnthn | dlem: That looks...familiar | 21:09 | |
dlem | oookay? | 21:10 | |
jnthn | dlem: The one we have is using some kind of automaton also | ||
dlem | Oh, I see. The fastest implementation is at the bottom of the page. | 21:11 | |
jnthn | ohhh | ||
Yeah, we have the one from that page already :) | |||
No wonder it looked familiar :) | |||
dlem | He he, OK. I didn't know what you were using, I was just lurking and remembered this very nice implementation. | 21:12 | |
jnthn | :) | ||
dlem | And you are hoping to make an even faster implementation. Hmmm... | 21:13 | |
jnthn | Well, when you notice something is high in a profile then there can be two reasons: it's slow, or you're doing a lot of it. | ||
And the second could certainly be true. | |||
dlem | Indeed. | 21:14 | |
jnthn | It's only gotten worse now we NFG all the incoming things too. | ||
dlem | I can only imagine. | 21:16 | |
21:16
colomon joined
|
|||
dlem goes to bed | 21:17 | ||
See you! | |||
[Coke] | jnthn: do you see any major blocks to porting your NFG work to Java? | 21:26 | |
jnthn | [Coke]: No | ||
[Coke] | excellent. | ||
That seems like something I could make work eventually... will scope it out. | 21:28 | ||
jnthn | [Coke]: I think the main thing that will make it tolerable is that Java and the JVM support overloading | 21:32 | |
[Coke]: So for every method that takes a String you can add an overload taking an NFGString or so | |||
21:52
FROGGS joined
|