00:01
nwc10 joined
00:44
d4l3k_ joined
00:49
timotimo joined
01:13
colomon_ joined
01:49
TimToady joined
02:30
colomon joined
02:48
ilbot3 joined
05:32
vendethiel joined
05:46
dalek joined
06:08
dalek joined
06:14
[Coke] joined
06:16
mojca joined
06:22
mojca_ joined
06:48
vendethiel joined
06:51
domidumont joined
06:56
domidumont joined
06:58
FROGGS[mobile] joined
07:21
orbus joined
07:28
llfourn joined,
domidumont joined
07:36
domidumont joined
07:38
domidumont joined
07:44
domidumont joined
08:12
domidumont joined
08:28
zakharyas joined
08:29
brrt joined
|
|||
brrt | wow, jnthn++ has been busy | 08:31 | |
08:43
ashleydev joined
08:59
zakharyas joined
|
|||
timotimo | what's this i hear about a huge memory leak? o_O | 09:32 | |
is that just a consequence of "now i can actually see real leaks when using --full-cleanup"? | |||
jnthn | timotimo: If it's the one I'm hunitng, it's not a leak in that sense. | 09:54 | |
timotimo | 094956 brrt │ ouch, /me has a huge memory leak on my hand in moar it seems | 09:55 | |
^- that's the one | |||
jnthn | Oh | ||
Would be interested to know about that :) | 09:56 | ||
I should prolly do $dayjob bits today... :) | |||
09:56
brrt joined
|
|||
brrt | no, it was in perl6 | 09:57 | |
rakudo itself | |||
looping infinitely | |||
apparantly we don't do TCO yet | 09:58 | ||
timotimo | yeah, we don't :) | ||
jnthn | Uh, no :) | 09:59 | |
brrt | didn't think so | 10:00 | |
:-) | |||
timotimo | i recently leaned out the window claiming that once we have trace jit, it'd only be a little step towards having TCO | 10:01 | |
brrt | hmmmm | 10:07 | |
yeah | |||
i see what you mean | |||
we should have had trace jit yesterday and expr jit last year | |||
well, we almost have expr jit | 10:09 | ||
jnthn | :) | ||
jnthn will be glad when that lands :) | |||
brrt | it's just that progress has been much slower than anticipated | ||
yeah, me too :-) | |||
i plan to give a presentation on 'how to hack the moarvm jit' to expose all the hackable bits | |||
because there are plenty | |||
fwiw, about the json-fast bug | 10:10 | ||
the issue at hand seems to be that the original jit creates 4! different dynamic-label-loading-codes | |||
and the expr jit only ones | 10:11 | ||
one | |||
which is *weird* | |||
but can probably be explained somehow | |||
10:13
donaldh joined
|
|||
brrt | the getlex bit works beautifully, fwiw | 10:13 | |
already shorter than the corresponding lego-jit | |||
jnthn | Nice | 10:15 | |
I'm keen to look into doing smarter JIT of bigint ops and using CPU overflow flags for the bigint fallback once it's in :) | 10:17 | ||
"lego-jit" :D | |||
timotimo | what json-fast bug is that? o_O | 10:20 | |
brrt | oh, a bug in the expr jit that manifests within json-fast | 10:41 | |
timotimo | ah, ok | ||
brrt | it's the reason i wrote the jit-bisecter | ||
timotimo | is it in the to-json or from-json part? :D | ||
(because i only wrote the latter, not the former) | 10:42 | ||
there's a stackoverflow post asking for a way to have wchar_t; what do we need to add to moar to support that "properly"? | |||
i imagine from its description "Type whose range of values can represent distinct codes for all members of the largest extended character set specified among the supported locales." on cplusplus.com, it'd be 32bit big? | |||
jnthn | I think 16 bits | 10:43 | |
timotimo | fortunately, c and cpp both have char16_t andchar32_t. do we want to support "is encoded" for that? | ||
jnthn | Ah, but that 16-bits is probably a Windows-ism | 10:44 | |
timotimo | probably | ||
this question in particular is about ncurses' addwstr(const wchar_t *wstr) function | |||
let me lookat what that's defined as | |||
jnthn | Well, I'd expect is encoded('utf-16') or so | ||
"The wchar_t type is intended for storing compiler-defined wide characters, which may be Unicode characters in some compilers" | 10:45 | ||
timotimo | oh, i missed the "see 5 more comments" button | 10:46 | |
in general, that question isn't of high quality ... | 10:48 | ||
at least in repl.it, with stddef.h, sizeof(wchar_t) is 4, so 32bit | 10:49 | ||
timotimo figured out where "is ctype" is implemented | 10:54 | ||
what a garden path ... | 10:56 | ||
ah, finally :) | 10:57 | ||
so, should i add wchar_t to the list of supported "ctype" values? | 10:58 | ||
jnthn | It seems that's what'd be needed to handle it portably | 10:59 | |
timotimo | righto | 11:00 | |
good thing we have enough negative numbers to handle most common integer and float types in C | |||
ugh. a 19 megabytes profile from --profile-compile of SDL2::Raw's Raw.pm | 11:04 | ||
we already seem to have an "id" field in pretty much every object in our profiles; why don't we go ahead and put an id-to-thing-map up front and then deduplicate that stuff out of the rest of the json blob? | 11:23 | ||
11:23
kjs_ joined
|
|||
timotimo | in allocations, that'd get rid of the "type" field, in callframes, i'd expect it'd get rid of file and line | 11:24 | |
jnthn | It could well make things a lot smaller, yeah | 11:28 | |
timotimo | i'm feeling like digging into that | ||
11:37
FROGGS[mobile] joined
12:24
FROGGS joined
|
|||
timotimo also deduplicates filenames in the "id-to-thing" map | 12:34 | ||
using negative numbers, neat/evil trick | |||
the profile-compile output of SDL2::Raw went from 18 megabytes to 12 megabytes already | 12:35 | ||
OK, deduplicating the filenames from the initial "dictionary" gives almost no improvement, which isn't a big surprise | 12:38 | ||
er ... json doesn't actually like negative numbers as object keys | 12:44 | ||
so i'll just throw the deduplication out of that part | |||
13:00
FROGGS joined
|
|||
ilmari | s/negative // # they have to be strings | 13:10 | |
timotimo | hm | ||
ilmari | m: from-json(to-json({ 42 => "wat" })) | ||
camelia | ( no output ) | ||
ilmari | m: say from-json(to-json({ 42 => "wat" })) | 13:11 | |
camelia | rakudo-moar 9aa014: OUTPUT«42 => wat» | ||
ilmari | huh? | ||
timotimo | well, => already makes strings | ||
from its LHS if it's a literal | |||
ilmari | m: say from-json(to-json( 42 => "wat" )) | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar f0a21b: OUTPUT«Invalid JSON: { 42 : "wat"} in block <unit> at /tmp/RRzQ7HkbLB line 1» | ||
ilmari | that was the one | ||
timotimo | mhh | 13:12 | |
ilmari | a bare pair, not a hash | ||
14:32
kjs_ joined
17:13
domidumont joined,
FROGGS[mobile] joined
17:40
vendethiel joined
18:12
domidumont joined
18:23
patrickz joined
18:29
vendethiel joined
18:53
zakharyas joined
18:58
vendethiel joined
18:59
domidumont joined
19:13
kjs_ joined
20:27
btyler joined
21:32
colomon joined
|
|||
dalek | arVM/heap-profiler: 5740e33 | jnthn++ | / (5 files): Sketch in heap profiler data structures. |
21:37 | |
21:41
vendethiel joined
22:32
colomon joined
22:36
colomon_ joined
22:49
mojca joined
|