00:01
pyrimidine joined
00:21
pyrimidine joined
01:10
pyrimidi_ joined
02:18
pyrimidine joined
02:38
pyrimidine joined
02:48
ilbot3 joined,
pyrimidine joined
03:06
pyrimidine joined
03:14
pyrimidine joined
03:31
pyrimidine joined
03:45
pyrimidine joined
04:02
pyrimidine joined
04:06
geekosaur joined
05:44
pyrimidine joined
05:54
pyrimidine joined
06:04
pyrimidine joined
06:14
pyrimidine joined
06:24
pyrimidine joined
|
|||
brrt | \o | 06:25 | |
i am in fact no longer fully convinced that a second 'register assignment' loop in linear scan maear scan makes any sense at all | 06:30 | ||
because you need to be able to find the ' current' live range that stands for a particular value, and that 'current' version lives usuaully in the active set to begin with | 06:32 | ||
06:34
pyrimidine joined
|
|||
brrt | you *can* move it t o a later phase but it is kind of pointlyess | 06:39 | |
pointless | |||
06:40
pyrimidine joined
06:50
pyrimidine joined
06:59
domidumont joined
|
|||
brrt | hmmm, okay, so let me think about that some more | 07:04 | |
while running linear scan, I may have to update existing references to live ranges to other references because the live range themselves have been spilled | 07:05 | ||
if i wait with register assignment until after the first loop, I can simply read the registers per tile from the updates references | 07:06 | ||
however, since i already must do the update, updating the register number rather than the reference seems to me to be equivalent | |||
so what i need... is a register assignment primitive that updates the users of the live range to the new register | 07:09 | ||
07:56
pyrimidine joined
08:04
pyrimidine joined
08:18
pyrimidine joined
08:25
zakharyas joined,
pyrimidine joined
08:34
pyrimidine joined
08:54
pyrimidine joined
09:09
pyrimidine joined
09:34
pyrimidine joined
09:41
pyrimidine joined
09:50
pyrimidine joined
09:53
Util joined
10:02
vendethiel- joined
10:05
pyrimidi_ joined
10:14
pyrimidine joined
|
|||
brrt | so, sucky news, but $employer has just suspended the hackathon time... | 10:19 | |
10:27
pyrimidi_ joined
|
|||
timotimo | :o | 10:33 | |
10:50
pyrimidine joined
|
|||
brrt | yes | 11:00 | |
the good news bit is that I think I have a definitive answer to the second-loop problem; it is not necessary and it doesn't simplify anything | 11:01 | ||
timotimo | first-loop problems, man | ||
brrt | :-D | 11:02 | |
note for future references: I'm going to store the index node-that-references the live range along in the use array of the live ranges, so that I have a complete mapping from live ranges to tile nodes, so that when I assign the actual register to the live range, I can find the tiles that have to be assigned the register to by simply looping over the 'uses' array | 11:07 | ||
which means that i no longer have to maintain a tile -> live range mapping because the mapping will be in the reverse order, which is the interesting order anyway | 11:08 | ||
and... if i do that for definitions as well as uses, this generalizes nicely because definitions are always in the '0' index, and I can still always 'reuse' the definitions/uses when splitting/spilling | 11:11 | ||
but first, lunch & | |||
timotimo | ah, nice | ||
11:42
brrt` joined
12:08
ggoebel joined
12:35
pyrimidine joined
12:44
pyrimidine joined
12:54
pyrimidine joined
13:03
pyrimidine joined
13:13
pyrimidine joined
13:15
japhb joined
13:21
pyrimidine joined
13:33
pyrimidine joined
13:43
pyrimidine joined
13:53
pyrimidine joined
14:02
dalek joined
14:45
pyrimidine joined
14:52
pyrimidine joined
15:03
nwc10 joined
15:08
pyrimidine joined
15:26
domidumont joined
15:50
domidumont joined
|
|||
timotimo | should i continue putting "but got REPR debug_name" stuff into places like the interpreter? | 15:57 | |
maybe smaller code would be better | |||
so maybe there should be a function that gets called to build the error message from a few parts | |||
i'm not convinced that's actually smaller | |||
OTOH, we jit a bunch of things, so the size of the interpreter itself isn't as noticable for hot things | 16:01 | ||
brrt | i don't really know the answer to that, tbh | 16:34 | |
16:40
FROGGS joined
17:00
pyrimidine joined
17:06
pyrimidine joined
17:58
japhb joined
18:27
japhb joined
19:43
domidumont joined
19:57
pyrimidine joined
20:26
pyrimidi_ joined
20:35
zakharyas joined
20:37
domidumont joined
20:53
pyrimidine joined
21:03
pyrimidine joined
21:13
pyrimidine joined
21:34
pyrimidine joined
21:38
pyrimidi_ joined
21:42
vendethiel joined
21:49
pyrimidine joined
22:02
pyrimidine joined
22:29
pyrimidine joined
23:08
pyrimidine joined
|