github.com/moarvm/moarvm | IRC logs at colabti.org/irclogger/irclogger_logs/moarvm Set by AlexDaniel on 12 June 2018. |
|||
00:07
vrurg left
00:13
dogbert11 joined
00:17
dogbert17 left
00:21
vrurg joined
07:50
sena_kun joined
09:11
squashable6 left
09:14
squashable6 joined
|
|||
nine | I think we have a new contender for highest commit message length to patch length ratio :D github.com/MoarVM/MoarVM/commit/29...7fe83daea1 | 11:16 | |
cog | Nine, as a bystander so far, I appreciate all the pedagogical work done by the MoarVM contributors. Thx | 11:20 | |
nine | cog: you're welcome :) | 11:28 | |
bartolin_ | nine++ | 11:41 | |
dogbert11 | nine++, soon there won't be a single MoarVM error left | 12:02 | |
it's getting increasingly hard to find new bugs but that's a good thing :) | 12:03 | ||
MasterDuke | nine++ | 12:06 | |
dogbert11: btw, if you're looking for new ways to find bugs, both clang and gcc have static analyzers that have already found some legit bugs | 12:07 | ||
though gcc 11 should significantly improve its analyzer, so i'm waiting for it to really look at its output | 12:08 | ||
nine | There's also still the spesh bug leading to "Cannot find method 'sink' on 'BOOTCode'" in t/spec/S17-supply/return-in-tap.t | ||
cog | IN such specialised and difficult, more likely the lack of competent people. That's why it is important to cheer up the people who do the hard work. | ||
nwc10 | nine: gah, I think you win :-/ | 12:09 | |
So, I was a bit distracted a month ago, so forgot to mention blog.pyston.org/ | 12:11 | ||
but anyway, it's 5 months now and *still* no other info | |||
I guess this ought to be the new schedule - Fibonaccii | |||
so I'll comment again in 8 months and 13 (etc) | |||
unless they actually share some new plan that can actually work on "how to monetise infrastrcture" | 12:12 | ||
www.pypy.org/blog/ doesn't have much news either | |||
nwc10 re-reads | 12:21 | ||
nine: yes, you totally win. (and I hope nothing beats you in the future) | 12:22 | ||
doing the whitespace ignoring diff in my head, you changed two times if (...) { ... } to if (1) { ... } | 12:23 | ||
eliminated the if, removed the block, re-idented | |||
so effectively remove 2 lines. with 108 lines of commit message | 12:24 | ||
dogbert11 | There seems to be a GC error lurking somewhere | 12:29 | |
I get it when running t/spec/S17-procasync/stress.t | |||
test 24 more specifically | 12:31 | ||
nine | dogbert11: oh, I think I know why | 12:36 | |
dogbert11 | cool, so you don't even need a gist :) | 12:40 | |
here it is anyway :) gist.github.com/dogbert17/9c2bd935...985db41633 | 12:42 | ||
nine | dogbert11: pushed a fix | ||
dogbert11 | you're fast | ||
nine | Directly to master since it's embarassingly trivial... | ||
Once one asks the right question like "are there any existing MVMROOT that I need to add the new arguments to", they are surpringinly easy to answer... | 12:43 | ||
dogbert11 | nine++ | 12:44 | |
a few quick test runs confirms that your fix works splendidly | 12:46 | ||
lizmat just bumped MoarVM and nqp | 13:55 | ||
14:29
patrickb joined
15:54
domidumont joined
16:20
zakharyas joined
16:40
Kaiepi joined
17:07
zakharyas left
17:13
zakharyas joined
17:49
domidumont left
19:06
patrickb left
19:09
patrickb joined
19:52
patrickb left
20:45
zakharyas left
21:49
sena_kun left
23:22
dogbert17 joined
23:26
dogbert11 left
|