|
01:14
btyler joined
|
|||
| _sri wonders if Supply should really be called Observable | 01:57 | ||
| timotimo | well, there's a dualism between observables and iterators and the whole reactive programming thing | 01:59 | |
| jnthn has pointed it out multiple times in the past | |||
| so the decision to name the thingies supplies was deliberate with that in mind, i believe | 02:00 | ||
| _sri | i see | ||
| japhb | .ask FROGGS re: 4a6dac6 and following, why did you write the function in tail-recursive form rather than simple iteration? | 02:32 | |
| Gah, ENOBOT | |||
|
03:40
cxreg joined
05:06
woosley joined
05:11
woosley joined
05:20
woosley joined
05:52
btyler joined
06:59
FROGGS joined
07:05
zakharyas joined
|
|||
| jnthn | Yeah, Rx calls it an observable, for sure. But just because things have a certain name elsewhere doens't mean they'll end up with that name in Perl 6. | 07:51 | |
|
07:53
btyler joined
09:36
donaldh joined
10:08
dalek joined
10:53
eternaleye joined
13:48
btyler joined
14:24
donaldh joined
14:25
benabik joined
|
|||
| timotimo | jnthn: should i expect there to ever be a way to introduce new registers to specialized bytecode segments? | 14:40 | |
|
14:40
cognominal joined
|
|||
| timotimo | and would it make a difference if the code would have to promise that new registers would never "leak" into the rest of the bytecode? | 14:40 | |
|
15:07
FROGGS joined
|
|||
| FROGGS | m: say <body><blink>WAT</blink></body> | 15:10 | |
| camelia | rakudo-moar d2dfb6: OUTPUT«===SORRY!=== Error while compiling /tmp/EJC_mX9xS0Two terms in a rowat /tmp/EJC_mX9xS0:1------> say <body><blink>⏏WAT</blink></body> expecting any of: postfix infix stopper …» | ||
| synopsebot | Link: perlcabal.org/syn/S0.html#line_1 | ||
| tadzik | confused synopsebot | 15:11 | |
| timotimo | %) | ||
| jnthn: also, do you think it'd be worth something to teach spesh, that the boxing instructions return an instance of the type object they get passed? | 15:13 | ||
| i wonder if link time optimization (which has been dramatically improved compilation-performance-wise in the newest gcc) will give us a lot of benefits for moarvm | 16:08 | ||
| sadly, fedora doesn't have gcc 4.9 yet | 16:10 | ||
| ah, it'll probably only go in rawhide, if even. | 16:12 | ||
|
16:13
btyler joined
16:40
[Coke] joined
|
|||
| [Coke] | ... Hey, everybody. Forgot I wasn't here. | 16:40 | |
|
17:18
brrt joined
|
|||
| FROGGS | hi [Coke] | 17:20 | |
|
18:03
benabik joined
|
|||
| timotimo | o/ | 19:49 | |
|
22:20
d4l3k_ joined
23:51
benabik joined
23:52
synopsebot joined,
Util joined,
[Coke] joined
|
|||