|
00:12
daxim joined
02:48
colomon joined
04:46
ggoebel111111110 joined
05:50
avuserow joined
06:13
garyaj joined
07:00
PerlJam joined,
retupmoca joined,
odc joined,
leedo joined,
nine_ joined
07:10
btyler_ joined
07:32
nine_ joined,
leedo joined,
retupmoca joined,
btyler_ joined
07:37
PerlJam joined,
odc joined,
FROGGS joined
07:40
retupmoca joined,
leedo joined,
nine_ joined
08:33
zakharyas joined
09:06
kjs_ joined
09:48
brrt joined
|
|||
| brrt | please somebody remind me to blog for moar one of these days (after the weekend) | 09:49 | |
|
09:53
avuserow joined,
ggoebel111111110 joined,
japhb joined,
cxreg joined,
lue joined
09:56
retupmoca joined,
leedo joined,
nine_ joined,
cxreg joined
09:58
nebuchadnezzar joined,
[Coke] joined
12:12
JimmyZ joined
|
|||
| JimmyZ | masak: ping? | 12:30 | |
| masak | JimmyZ: pong | 12:34 | |
|
12:35
kjs_ joined
|
|||
| [Coke] | seen in today's moar non-jit run: | 13:49 | |
| S32-hash/delete-adverb.t...........................moar(34011,0x7fff7bce2310) malloc: *** error for object 0x7f8954e56840: pointer being freed was not allocated | |||
| *** set a breakpoint in malloc_error_break to debug | |||
| sh: line 1: 34011 Abort trap: 6 nice -20 ./perl6-m t/spec/S32-hash/del | |||
| OSX. | |||
| Looks like that's the only fail on non-jit, but it cost 131 tests. | 13:56 | ||
| brrt | [Coke] - are there jit-specific fails? | 14:15 | |
| i kind of need to know about them :-) | |||
| also [Coke]++ for testing | |||
| timotimo | brrt: how much have you looked at nativecall_invoke yet? | ||
| i'm asking just because i'd like to begin turning native call invocations into jitted stuff by using the jgb_append_call_c function | 14:16 | ||
| brrt | i have not looked at it at all | 14:17 | |
| timotimo | OK | ||
| brrt | where... is that stuff | ||
| :-) | |||
| timotimo | so i'm not going to be trampling on previous work without knowing :) | ||
| brrt | is that a new op? | ||
| timotimo | nativecall.c is in core/ i think | ||
| brrt | oh | ||
| i'll look | |||
| timotimo | it's called nativecallinvoke actually | 14:18 | |
| i think it'll be enough if i just look at it and ask specific questions directly, so you can focus on other stuff | |||
| [Coke] | brrt: the JIT-specific failures are here when they are posted: | 14:23 | |
| github.com/coke/perl6-roast-data/b...ummary.out | |||
| brrt | thanks | ||
| timotimo: good idea :-) | |||
| [Coke] | today? no failures on JIT. non-JIT is the problem. | 14:24 | |
| brrt | [Coke] - this is on which platform? | ||
| hmm | |||
| seems like flappiness | |||
| JIT is rather unlikely to do something right that was done wrong by the interpreter | |||
| [Coke] | (but yesterday, S32-hash/delete-adverb.t had the failure non-jit had today; sounds like a flapper) | ||
| brrt | yeah i agree | ||
| [Coke] | brrt: right now is OS X. historically, it was linux. | ||
| timotimo | brrt: have you considered building fast-paths for big integer arithmetic in the cases where both operands are stored as "small big ints"? | 14:25 | |
| timotimo is AFK for a bit | |||
| brrt | considered, yes, but i don't know if you can prove that they will always be fast paths | ||
| and you're going to end up testing-and-jumping for the case they are not | |||
| i can do that, and it will probably help a bit, but I don't know if the JIT is the right level for it | 14:26 | ||
| (of course the JIT should do it one day or another) | |||
| s/day/way/ | |||
| I'm going to see if i can repeat those tests. we don't nearly have enough os-x based devs :-) | 14:27 | ||
| clang-is-so-damn-slow | 14:30 | ||
|
14:32
lizmat joined
|
|||
| timotimo | brrt: yeah, i expect that you'd have to test-and-branch | 14:48 | |
| brrt | hmmm | 14:49 | |
| i'll be able to work on this in a week or so (hopefully) | |||
| timotimo | neat (even though arguments would be more pressing or something like that) | 14:50 | |
| brrt | :-) | 15:02 | |
| yeah i know i know | |||
| :-) | |||
| timotimo | sorry for nagging you about that all the time :P | ||
|
15:03
odc left
|
|||
| kjs_ | re Mac OS devs: is there a “press this once” button to run tests? I’m happy to test now and again, but no time to develop | 15:04 | |
| timotimo | a simple script could be built using rakudobrew for building a fresh rakudo and then run the spec tests | ||
| brrt | aye | 15:05 | |
| rakudobrew would be a good place to put that | |||
| timotimo | ah, yes | ||
| rakudobrew test moar | |||
| OSLT | |||
| brrt | get to it | 15:06 | |
| timotimo | and then we could have a reporter | ||
| brrt | or 'well volunteered' | ||
| :-) | |||
| i'm going to weekend | |||
| timotimo | haha | ||
| have fun brrt | |||
| TimToady wonders if it would make more sense in some cases to just attempt the op and then branch on overflow, if it can be detected | 15:25 | ||
| timotimo | we'd still have to check if the storage type is a "proper" bigint already or if it's a smallbigint | 15:26 | |
| JimmyZ | Isn't life simpler if there is Int class and BigInt Class :P | 15:35 | |
| TimToady | not for the user | 15:37 | |
| JimmyZ | aye | ||
| timotimo | wouldn't it be easier to have a regular string that does the stringy stuff and a unicode string type that you use when you want to do unicody stuff? :P | 15:38 | |
| timotimo AFK | |||
| TimToady | in any case, the design of P6 assumes that people will write int64 or so when they want raw speed | 15:39 | |
| JimmyZ agrees it | 15:41 | ||
| TimToady | or have some pragma that says "use Int int64;" | ||
| JimmyZ | constant Int = int64 :P | ||
| TimToady | we'll need jnthn's N refactor first | ||
| "constant Int" will not necessarily switch the policy of using big integers for intermediate results | 15:42 | ||
| JimmyZ | I saw constant utf8 = Blob[...] in the core setting | 15:43 | |
| TimToady | though I suppose we could say that if you redefined Int to be a native type, it magically assumes that you want that for intermediate results as well | 15:44 | |
| but it might be wise to have a separate declaration for such semantic bending | 15:45 | ||
| then there's the folks who will want "constant Int = num" | 15:46 | ||
| JimmyZ | yeah, I saw constant buf8 = Buf[uint8]; there | ||
| TimToady | .oO(constant Int = complex) |
15:47 | |
| JimmyZ | :P | ||
| TimToady | some people may actually think they want constant Num = Complex | 15:49 | |
| though it's probably sufficient to redefine sqrt to always return complex | 15:50 | ||
| [Coke] | we need something like smolder to record test runs. | ||
| [Coke] is reminded to get back to trying to get spectest runs into jenkins. | 15:51 | ||
| JimmyZ | Good night ... | 15:53 | |
|
15:54
lue joined
16:04
Guest1419 joined
16:26
FROGGS joined
16:55
colomon joined
17:36
kjs_ joined
17:51
FROGGS joined
21:26
woolfy1 joined
21:27
lizmat_ joined
22:43
japhb joined,
avuserow joined
|
|||
| dalek | arVM/closefhi: 8d9f84a | (Tobias Leich)++ | / (14 files): implement nqp::closefhi which retuns the exit code of a pipe nqp::openpipe returns a file handle one can read from, but since such an opened pipe is actually a spawned process we also need its exit code to know if it run cleanly. Use nqp::closefhi on such a file handle if you are interested in the exit code, nqp::closefh if you are not. |
22:46 | |
|
22:48
ggoebel111111110 joined
|
|||