| ShimmerFairy | for that loop presented earlier, playing with it just now I find that class C::C { }; EVAL 'sub foo() { return C::C.new(a => 1, b => 2) }; foo()' for ^105 seems to be where it breaks (^104 is fine) | 01:29 | |
|
01:30
vendethiel joined
01:33
tokuhiro_ joined
02:34
tokuhiro_ joined
|
|||
| hoelzro | if I add a member to a struct in MoarVM, do I have to tell spesh about it somehow? | 02:37 | |
| ShimmerFairy: what happens when you run with 105? | |||
| I didn't see the original post | |||
| ShimmerFairy | m: class C::C { }; EVAL 'sub foo() { return C::C.new(a => 1, b => 2) }; foo()' for ^105 | 02:38 | |
| camelia | rakudo-moar 0024b0: OUTPUT«Default constructor for 'C::C' only takes named arguments in sub foo at EVAL_104:1 in block <unit> at EVAL_104:1 in block <unit> at /tmp/8wGHwXlsCe:1» | ||
| ShimmerFairy | m: class C::C { }; EVAL 'sub foo() { return C::C.new(a => 1, b => 2) }; foo()' for ^104 | ||
| camelia | ( no output ) | ||
| ShimmerFairy | Unless I'm mistaken it's the panda jit thingy | ||
| hoelzro | whoa | 02:39 | |
| have you tried with MVM_JIT_DISABLE=1 and MVM_SPESH_DISABLE=1 ? | |||
| ShimmerFairy | not myself, but that's the golfed line jnthn gave for the problem as presented in panda (and yeah, IIRC it's definitely a JIT issue) | 02:40 | |
| hoelzro | neat | 02:41 | |
| ShimmerFairy | the original code showed it work at ^100 and fail at ^500, so I just wanted to see if there was a specific number where it consistently failed (and that seems to be the case) :) | 02:45 | |
|
04:36
tokuhiro_ joined
05:29
tokuhiro_ joined
07:31
tokuhiro_ joined
07:38
vendethiel joined
10:31
zakharyas joined
11:34
tokuhiro_ joined
11:49
FROGGS joined
13:07
zakharyas1 joined
13:25
brrt joined
13:36
tokuhiro_ joined
13:59
brrt joined
14:11
FROGGS_ joined
14:21
zakharyas joined
15:37
tokuhiro_ joined
15:40
ggoebel joined
15:48
brrt joined
16:30
ShimmerFairy joined
|
|||
| brrt | jnthn: the main difficulty in catching it under the debugger is that i'm not 100% sure where it *should* catch it | 16:31 | |
| hmm | |||
| althugh | |||
| maybe we can just dump the whole lexical table for each inline | |||
| like a bunch of barbarians | 16:32 | ||
| timotimo | yup | 16:50 | |
|
17:25
brrt joined
17:39
tokuhiro_ joined
19:36
cognominal joined
20:35
tokuhiro_ joined
20:36
vendethiel joined
22:36
tokuhiro_ joined
22:45
cognominal joined
|
|||