github.com/moarvm/moarvm | IRC logs at colabti.org/irclogger/irclogger_logs/moarvm Set by AlexDaniel on 12 June 2018. |
|||
00:35
pamplemousse__ joined
00:47
Geth left
00:48
Geth joined
00:49
pamplemousse__ left
04:43
linkable6 left,
evalable6 left,
tellable6 left
04:44
evalable6 joined
04:45
linkable6 joined,
tellable6 joined
|
|||
nwc10 | good *, #moarvm | 05:02 | |
06:55
Altai-man joined
07:16
domidumont joined
07:44
zakharyas joined
07:59
zakharyas left
08:01
Altai-man left
08:06
zakharyas joined
08:22
zakharyas left
08:24
zakharyas joined
|
|||
MasterDuke | anyone have a suggestion for this weird problem i'm seeing? or want to look at the diff i posted earlier? i think the problem is not in bigintops.c (well, at least not the math ops implementations) since the math tests are ok for the most part | 11:13 | |
11:20
leont joined
|
|||
lizmat | MasterDuke: I understand that today is a public holiday in the Czech Republic, and jnthn is enjoying some R&R, so don't expect anything from him today | 11:27 | |
also not from me, as this is way outside of my thinking cap | 11:28 | ||
11:30
zakharyas left
|
|||
MasterDuke | eh, i bet i've made a silly error. accidentally deleted an extra line somewhere when removing libtommath code, etc. i think almost anyone with a fresh pair of eyes could look at the diff and might spot something | 11:32 | |
lizmat | MasterDuke: if nobody has looked at it before I finish today's RWN, I will have a look :-) | 11:39 | |
MasterDuke | lizmat: thanks. nobody should feel they have to, but it is appreciated | 11:40 | |
11:59
pamplemousse__ joined
|
|||
lizmat | MasterDuke: what were the performance improvements again wrt to nqp::isprime_I ? | 12:06 | |
lizmat should read to complete commit message | |||
sorry for the nois | |||
s | |||
e | |||
s | |||
12:09
brrt joined,
sena_kun joined
|
|||
MasterDuke | lizmat: you got what you needed from the commit message? | 12:27 | |
lizmat | yeah :-) | ||
300000x as fast down to 2.5x as fast :-) | |||
MasterDuke | heh | ||
12:53
zakharyas joined
13:00
brrt left
13:20
domidumont left
13:23
domidumont joined
13:28
domidumont left
13:40
brrt joined
13:42
domidumont joined
14:30
MasterDuke left
14:40
MasterDuke joined
|
|||
MasterDuke | hm. i looked through my diff and didn't see anything terribly off. i did find a minor mistake, but it wasn't relevant to the problem i'm seeing | 14:41 | |
14:43
zakharyas left
|
|||
Geth | MoarVM/hash-fix-fix: 8852896dc1 | (Nicholas Clark)++ | 5 files A more complete fix for the hash max probe distance bug. commit 25c70bfe01eb6404 only actually fixed one of two possible places where this bug could occur: Hash tables must also resize if the max probe distance is hit on an empty slot. Not just for the case of max probe distance being hit during the move ... (15 more lines) |
14:50 | |
MoarVM/hash-fix-fix: a27c78829a | (Nicholas Clark)++ | 2 files The lookup table in MVP_round_up_log_base2() can be uint8_t. All values are small enough to fit into one byte, so shrink the table by 96 bytes. Also store the value pre-computed with "plus 1", instead of doing the addition as part of the return expression. This saves an instruction. Fix a typo in an enum, spotted by timotimo. |
|||
MoarVM: nwc10++ created pull request #1356: Hash fix fix |
|||
14:56
Altai-man joined,
zakharyas joined
14:58
sena_kun left
|
|||
[Coke] | FICK. | 15:21 | |
nwc10 | ex-FICK | 15:29 | |
Geth | MoarVM: 8852896dc1 | (Nicholas Clark)++ | 5 files A more complete fix for the hash max probe distance bug. commit 25c70bfe01eb6404 only actually fixed one of two possible places where this bug could occur: Hash tables must also resize if the max probe distance is hit on an empty slot. Not just for the case of max probe distance being hit during the move ... (15 more lines) |
15:31 | |
MoarVM: a27c78829a | (Nicholas Clark)++ | 2 files The lookup table in MVP_round_up_log_base2() can be uint8_t. All values are small enough to fit into one byte, so shrink the table by 96 bytes. Also store the value pre-computed with "plus 1", instead of doing the addition as part of the return expression. This saves an instruction. Fix a typo in an enum, spotted by timotimo. |
|||
16:00
pamplemousse__ left
16:16
samcv joined
16:17
brrt left
16:42
domidumont left
|
|||
lizmat | and yet another Rakudo Weekly News hits the Net: rakudoweekly.blog/2020/09/28/2020-...-releaser/ | 16:50 | |
17:06
pamplemousse__ joined
17:38
zakharyas left
|
|||
MasterDuke | lizmat++ fwiw, the significant speedup in is-prime is up to 2 billion | 18:02 | |
18:18
brrt joined
18:57
sena_kun joined
18:59
Altai-man left
19:05
zakharyas joined
|
|||
Geth | MoarVM/hash-debug: 0015fd05bd | (Nicholas Clark)++ | 3 files Re-instate meaningful hash iterator debugging inside HASH_DEBUG_ITER. The previous debugging code was removed as part of commit bac1ae1cf74f2917: Re-implement MVMStrHashTable as a Robin Hood Hash. and never added back. |
19:20 | |
MoarVM/hash-debug: fb99295086 | (Nicholas Clark)++ | 4 files Add MVM_str_hash_iterator_target_deleted() for HASH_DEBUG_ITER. This name is rather a mouthful, but it describes the logic that this function encapsulates - does this hash iterator point to an entry that has been deleted. This avoids repeating implementation details in four places. |
|||
MoarVM: nwc10++ created pull request #1357: Hash debug |
|||
lizmat | MasterDuke: yeah, but that is getting close to practically infinitely faster | 19:39 | |
MasterDuke | lizmat: sorry, i meant it's not the first 100k that are faster, it's the first 2B | ||
lizmat | aaaah... ok | 19:40 | |
ok, I'll fix that | |||
updated | 19:41 | ||
MasterDuke | lizmat++ | ||
20:11
pamplemousse__ left
|
|||
dogbert17 | MasterDuke: stupid question, when you're implementing cmp are you then removing all traces of libtommath in your patch? | 20:22 | |
*gmp | |||
MasterDuke | well, that'll be the plan | ||
dogbert17 | in your diff there seems to be a reference left, i.e. an #include but perhaps that's according to plan? | 20:23 | |
MasterDuke | ah, that was an oversight. don't think it should have caused the problem, but trying now | 20:27 | |
dogbert17 | well. it's all I've seen so far anyways :) | 20:28 | |
MasterDuke | good catch, but nope, didn't fix it | 20:33 | |
dogbert17 | darn | 20:35 | |
have you tried with the JIT turned off? | 20:39 | ||
MasterDuke | yep, and spesh off | ||
gist updated to latest changes | |||
dogbert17 | asan? | 20:40 | |
MasterDuke | ooo, i thought about that and valgrind last night and then forgot to try, thanks for the reminder | ||
no valgrind complaint | 20:44 | ||
dogbert17: i almost never use asan, how do i build with it? | |||
dogbert17 | MasterDuke: I tend to use 'perl Configure.pl --debug --asan --no-optimize --prefix=../../install/' in my MoarVM dir | 20:47 | |
the prefix might be different for you I guess | |||
MasterDuke | ASan runtime does not come first in initial library list; you should either link runtime to your application or manually preload it with LD_PRELOAD | 20:49 | |
dogbert17 | did you try to run something? | 20:50 | |
MasterDuke | it is first in my Makefile, but i guess i need to rebuild all the 3rdparty lib also | ||
yeah | |||
dogbert17 | I get that sometimes and then I use LD_PRELOAD | ||
MasterDuke | ah. what path do you give it | ||
dogbert17 | I cheat and use strace to see what it is looking for :) | 20:51 | |
MasterDuke | ha, that did work | 20:53 | |
dogbert17 | something like 'strace -e openat ./perl6-m <some code>' | ||
cool | |||
then you might want to set the following env variable as well: ASAN_OPTIONS="detect_leaks=0" | |||
otherwise you will get test failures which are actually memory leaks | 20:54 | ||
MasterDuke | ah, i get one leak reported with my example, no output otherwise | ||
dogbert17 | and no nasty errors | 20:55 | |
MasterDuke | none | ||
dogbert17 | and it still doesn't work properly | 20:56 | |
MasterDuke | yup | ||
dogbert17 | hmm ... | ||
the only additional thing I can think of atm is to run something like cppcheck on your MoarVM changes and see if it turns up anything | 20:57 | ||
21:02
sena_kun left
21:03
zakharyas left
|
|||
MasterDuke | nwc10: cppcheck warns about this github.com/MoarVM/MoarVM/blob/mast...#L114-L115 that "Size of pointer 'entry_raw' used instead of size of its data. This is likely to lead to a buffer overflow. You probably intend to write 'sizeof(*entry_raw)'." | 21:08 | |
but, nothing useful about my changes... | 21:17 | ||
21:23
brrt left
|
|||
moon-child | ha, it'll be the size of a pointer either way though | 22:26 | |
23:19
leont left
23:40
ggoebel left
23:45
ggoebel joined
|