00:01
CurtisOvidPoe joined
|
|||
timotimo | i forget why exactly we have cmp and then <=> | 00:05 | |
m: "omgwtf" cmp 123 | |||
camelia | rakudo-moar 4f7cb8: OUTPUT«WARNINGS for /tmp/e4ZgHUrtWz:Useless use of "cmp" in expression "\"omgwtf\" cmp 123" in sink context (line 1)» | ||
timotimo | m: say "omgwtf" cmp 123 | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar 4f7cb8: OUTPUT«More» | ||
timotimo | m: say "omgwtf" cmp Mu.new | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar 4f7cb8: OUTPUT«X::Multi::NoMatch exception produced no message in block <unit> at /tmp/ObAkKP3A74 line 1» | ||
timotimo | is that what we do this for? | ||
m: say "omgwtf" cmp Any.new | |||
camelia | rakudo-moar 4f7cb8: OUTPUT«More» | ||
timotimo | well, we're also doing expensive parameter binding/signature binding somewhere | 00:09 | |
00:24
colomon joined
02:41
pyrimidi_ joined
02:47
ilbot3 joined
02:51
FROGGS_ joined
|
|||
dalek | kudo/repl6: 55a71b3 | hoelzro++ | src/core/REPL.pm: REPL6: Set up path to history file if it doesn't exist |
03:58 | |
kudo/repl6: 8e5705a | hoelzro++ | src/core/REPL.pm: REPL6: Insulate REPL implementation helpers from setting We don't want to leak things like mkpath out into the setting; wrap them in their own lexical context |
04:31 | ||
05:06
colomon joined
08:09
geekosaur joined
09:46
RabidGravy joined
|
|||
dalek | kudo/nom: 65d42bc | lizmat++ | docs/ChangeLog: Add some ChangeLog entries At least the ones I recognized from the rakudo git log. This is by no means to be considered complete: I probably missed a lot of MoarVM and nqp improvements. |
10:56 | |
[Tux] | test 20.841 | 11:02 | |
test-t 13.219 | |||
csv-parser 48.993 | |||
lizmat | [Tux]: that's significantly less than yesterday, right (13.704) ? | 11:08 | |
[Tux] | 2016-03-16 11:07:16 test-t 13.702 | 11:09 | |
2016-03-17 08:30:57 test-t 14.080 | |||
2016-03-18 07:51:52 test-t 13.704 | |||
2016-03-19 11:58:49 test-t 13.219 | |||
sortiz | lizmat, Buf[num32] and Buf[num64] can be created, but aren't supported and in jnthn++ opinion the way is prohibit these. I don't know how. Ideas? | 11:38 | |
timotimo | oof | 11:52 | |
we really want it to not steal much performance | |||
lizmat | I would suggest a conditional die in the mainline of the Blob role that tests T === num32 || T === num64 ? | ||
timotimo | oh, of course | ||
that's what runs at compose time | |||
i forgot that bit :) | 11:53 | ||
lizmat | sortiz ^^^ | ||
timotimo: fwiw, I have a patch that eliminates copying the indices array in p6sort, but I only see a ~ 4% improvement | 11:54 | ||
so, apart from using less memory, there's not a lot to be had tere | |||
*there | |||
timotimo | do you see a good way to make the two closures inside the sort method better? | 11:55 | |
the one that does $foo cmp $bar || $foo <=> $bar | |||
in the profile, that seemed to really take a lot of time | 11:56 | ||
i think it may be the cause behind the high amount of Bool invocations perhaps? | |||
because it uses infix:<||>? | |||
sortiz | lizmat, A naked die or a typed Exception? | 11:57 | |
timotimo | something like InvalidArgumentException :P | ||
lizmat | NYI I would say ? | ||
X::NYI ? | |||
timotimo | we could do that, yeah | ||
i can imagine a Buf with nums to be implementable later | 11:58 | ||
lizmat | so, but Buf(num) works ? | ||
sortiz | timotimo, It's implementable now, adding all required *_n | 11:59 | |
Now all the Blob machinery expects ints | |||
timotimo | right | ||
it'll probably end up looking like the NumTypedNativeArray or whatever that role is called | 12:00 | ||
lizmat | well, this feels like another code generating job :-) | ||
sortiz | Yep | ||
timotimo | righto | ||
lizmat: if you find a good way to describe it, we've got a fix for certain unicode characters segfaulting moarvm since the last release | 12:01 | ||
directory listings now use utf8-c8 | |||
lizmat | is utf8-c8 fixed btw ? | 12:02 | |
timotimo | not yet | ||
dalek | kudo/nom: 319ec8e | lizmat++ | docs/ChangeLog: Some ChangeLog additions, timotimo++ |
12:04 | |
sortiz | timotimo, Umm Are you sure that the mainline of a role is run at compose time? COMPOSE phaser is NYI and the failed optim case of NativeCall worries me. | 12:05 | |
timotimo | optim case? | 12:06 | |
sortiz | lizmat++ attempted optimization but tater reverted case. | 12:07 | |
s/tater/later/ | 12:08 | ||
lizmat | I still think that's a hesienbug: I intend to reapply the patch after the release and see how it simmers out :-) | ||
sortiz | I have a working version, with the test for initialization inside of setup. | 12:09 | |
timotimo | there's a few memory-related optimizations in moar for this month's release; would they go into the changelog, too? | 12:10 | |
12:14
colomon joined
|
|||
sortiz | bbl o/ | 12:16 | |
lizmat | timotimo: I think they should | 12:19 | |
timotimo: perhaps it would help if we added native int candidates for infix:<&&> ? | 12:20 | ||
timotimo | isn't there also some compiler component to that? because we short-circuit that? | 12:21 | |
lizmat | timotimo: no idea | 12:22 | |
timotimo | oh, i think that's what's up. if we have native ints we'll use the compiler's own && implementation | ||
could that be it? | |||
lizmat | I have no idea, my compiler knowledge doesn't go that deep | ||
and anyways, I'm off for some fresh air :-) | |||
afk for a few hours& | 12:23 | ||
timotimo | i think at least in the case of the sort thingie, we'd benefit from short-circuiting that | 12:24 | |
hmm. | |||
i dunno | |||
i feel too tired to figure this out :) | |||
13:13
AlexDaniel joined
|
|||
jnthn | Both && and || compile into QAST if/unless nodes, which in turn are smart enough to do sensible things with natives. | 13:22 | |
14:11
RabidGravy joined
|
|||
masak | there's something very right about them compiling to if/unless nodes. | 15:07 | |
it also shows Yet Another Difference between QAST and Q. | |||
because in QAST, that kind of "operational" similarity is the central concern. | 15:08 | ||
in Q, an if statement is a different kind of thing from a (short-circuiting) infix operator. | |||
jnthn | Yeah, that's one of those places where it's not clear Q will be a net simplification from a compiler point of view. | 15:13 | |
masak | oh, you wanted compiler simplifications? that will be a tough one to square with having macros, yes :P | 16:29 | |
because macros essentially expose a number of (usually) internal compiler things | 16:30 | ||
especially parsing, but sometimes also related to control flow and the like | |||
jnthn | Well, it's possible that having a higher-level AST might make some manipulations easier though | 16:50 | |
18:40
colomon joined
|
|||
masak | yes, definitely | 19:39 | |
22:07
AlexDaniel joined
|
|||
dalek | kudo/nom: 8437418 | lizmat++ | src/core/Buf.pm: Disallow Buf/Blobbing with anything but Int Pointed out by sortiz++ |
22:23 | |
lizmat | good night, #p6dev | 22:27 | |
23:04
colomon joined
|