samcv [18:59:48] <samcv> why didn't we bump the subversion for nqp and moarvm again... cause 2017.04.3 requires a newer version of moarvm and nqp, and moarvm and nqp only have tags up to 2017.04.3 02:01
i'm trying to get gentoo's version bumped and trying to see what happened Zoffix so 2017.04.2 and .1 didn't need any changes to nqp and moarvm?
and then we didn't bump the moarvm and nqp version when 2017.04.3 was released? 02:02
lizmat Files=1192, Tests=58579, 210 wallclock secs (12.67 usr 4.60 sys + 1243.96 cusr 115.61 csys = 1376.84 CPU) 05:57
lizmat waves from the PTS in Lyon 07:28
brrt waves from AMS 07:30
lizmat so I want to add the information contained in nqp/gen/moar/stage1/nqp-config.nqp as part of the perl6 -V output 08:26
something like:
nqp::version=2017.04-96-g9763728 08:27
so I wonder if I need to require that file, and then run hll_config(my %h) 08:29
samcv lizmat, are you against us making tags for nqp and moarvm that match with 2017.04.3 ? 08:46
since the newest tag is not new enough for 2017.04.3 08:47
which was not the case for 2017.04.2 which didn't need any change to moar
lizmat I have nothing against that, but then I'm really the worst person to ask 08:53
you probably want to check with moritz [Coke] timotimo
ok: different approach 08:54
I would like to have "perl6 -V" call something from the setting
my 'nqp' fu is not strong enough 08:55
I know I need to do something in nqp/src/HLL/Compiler.nqp
inside "verbose_config"
but I seem to be missing some crucial parts of information there
samcv trying to add more info there? 08:57
or have it cause side effects
lizmat more info: basically nqp / kernel / distro info 08:59
probably also the $*REPO chain
for CPAN-testers 09:00
so we can get all of the applicable information of a Perl 6 module test report to the author of the module in case of faiulure
*failure :-) 09:01
samcv :) 09:02
all the info I said i wanted ALL the info
jnthn lizmat: I think there's an nqp::backendconfig op or so that this info can be pulled out of
samcv i think i've called that before
but that just dumps them right
jnthn oh
And
nqp --show-config
perl6 --show-config
:)
samcv she wanted to add info though?
jnthn Dumps all of them
samcv or she wanted to *get* that info 09:03
jnthn samcv: The op gives back a hash
samcv that is shown with perl6 -V from inside perl 6
yeah i know i've used it :)
jnthn So you can do what you like with it
samcv sorry i think i was thinking the opposite thing. she wanted to add information that you would see additional info with perl6 -V
jnthn re-reads it all :) 09:04
hah, right
m: use nqp; say nqp::hllize(nqp::getcomp('nqp').config) 09:07
camelia Cannot call method 'config' on a null object
in block <unit> at <tmp> line 1
jnthn m: use NQP; use nqp; say nqp::hllize(nqp::getcomp('nqp').config)
camelia ===SORRY!===
Could not find NQP at line 1 in:
/home/camelia/.perl6
/home/camelia/rakudo-m-inst-1/share/perl6/site
/home/camelia/rakudo-m-inst-1/share/perl6/vendor
/home/camelia/rakudo-m-inst-1/share/perl6
CompUnit::Reposit
jnthn m: use NQP:from<nqp>; use nqp; say nqp::hllize(nqp::getcomp('nqp').config)
camelia ===SORRY!===
Could not find NQP at line 1 in:
/home/camelia/.perl6
/home/camelia/rakudo-m-inst-1/share/perl6/site
/home/camelia/rakudo-m-inst-1/share/perl6/vendor
/home/camelia/rakudo-m-inst-1/share/perl6
CompUnit::Reposit
jnthn Hmm
m: use nqp; EVAL '1', :lang<nqp>; say nqp::hllize(nqp::getcomp('nqp').config) 09:08
camelia No compiler available for language 'nqp'
in block <unit> at <tmp> line 1
jnthn m: use nqp; EVAL '1', :lang<NQP>; say nqp::hllize(nqp::getcomp('nqp').config) 09:09
camelia No compiler available for language 'NQP'
in block <unit> at <tmp> line 1
jnthn huh, I thought we wired that up, maybe not
Anyway, if the NQP::Compiler object can somehow be loaded then it's available through .config on that, it seems
nine [Tux]: any new timings? :) 09:16
lizmat jnthn: well we would also like to add $*KERNEL and $*DISTRO info 09:18
or are you saying that's all in there also ? 09:19
if so, why are we using `uname` in various parts of Kernel.pm
jnthn It calls uname? Hm :) 09:20
heh
Well, calling that from in Perl6::Compiler should be relatively easy
There's a .eval method available on that object
So can just self.eval('$*KERNEL') or similar 09:21
(Sorry, bit tied up to look up exact naming)
lizmat ok, gotcha
so that would load the setting ?
jnthn Yeah 09:22
It happens right at the start of stage parse
lizmat m: class A { has Int $.a is default(42) }; dd A.new.a # expected to see 42 there, not Int, so feels like "is default" on attrs isn't implemented? 09:35
camelia Int
lizmat m: my Int $a is default(42); say $a 09:36
camelia 42
lizmat m: class A { has Int $.a is default(42) }; use nqp; dd nqp::getattr(A.CREATE,A,q/$!a/).VAR.default # oddly enough, it appears to be set 09:45
camelia 42
lizmat class A { has Int $!a is default(42); method a() is raw { $!a } }; dd A.CREATE.a # but this doesn't :-( 09:46
m: class A { has Int $!a is default(42); method a() is raw { $!a } }; dd A.CREATE.a # but this doesn't :-( 10:00
camelia Int $!a = Int
lizmat RT #131290 # for those interested 10:06
synopsebot6 Link: rt.perl.org/rt3/Public/Bug/Display...?id=131290
Zoffix samcv: right, .1 and .2 didn't need bumps, .3 mistakenly forgot the bumps
samcv ok. i can tag moarvm and nqp. should i do 2017.04.3 ? that should be easiest for people to follow right 10:07
Zoffix samcv: there's no point. It'd require a .4 release of Rakudo and we're not making one 10:08
samcv would it?
can't we just tag the repos?
you can tag previous commits
Zoffix samcv: what would be the point of those tags?
samcv those are tags that are the release designated by 2017.04.3 10:09
Zoffix samcv: nope
samcv the tags of where moarvm and nqp are as required by 2017.04.3 that is 10:10
it's weird that nqp and moarvm have no tags new enough for 2017.04.3
it's a distinct release marker 10:11
Zoffix samcv: 2017.04.3 doesn't refer to 2017.04.3 tags; which is why you'd need yet another point release to fix it
Zoffix thought the .04 release fiasco business was behind us
samcv we have 2017.04.3 tag in rakudo yes?
Zoffix Yes
samcv but there are no nqp or moarvm tags new enough to meet the requirements
Zoffix What requirement? 10:12
samcv that 2017.04.3 requires
Zoffix It doesn't require 2017.04.3
samcv you can tag any commit you want does't have to be the current commit. tags are seperate from the commits themselves
Zoffix Looks at build/tools/NQP_VERSIOn
samcv i know it doesn't
that what we should tag nqp as 2017.04.3 because the newest tag for nqp is not new enough to satisfy rakudo's nqp dependency 10:13
Zoffix Or we could wait 1 week and forget about it and not mess with .04 release 4 weeks after it happened 10:14
because you'd be taging a non-release with a release tag 10:15
samcv hm
i suppose so. maybe can add some comment in the release info for 2017.04.3 and mention the tags needed for nqp and moarvm 10:16
that would be ok with me. then we have it at least documented on the announcement page that it requires those tags. 10:17
Zoffix, does that sound alright with you? i can add the tags to github.com/rakudo/rakudo/blob/nom/...17.04.3.md and leave it at that? 10:18
Zoffix Go for it
samcv ok cool
works for me, sorry for being a pain :|
Geth rakudo/nom: 0f400eb429 | (Samantha McVey)++ | docs/announce/2017.04.3.md
Update 2017.04.3 announce to mention NQP and MoarVM tags

Mention there was no newer NQP or MoarVM releases and list the required git tags for them respectively.
10:33
Zoffix Cool PTS pictures: www.instagram.com/p/BT_QJGDDQSQ/?t...hainsummit 10:37
Is that Olaf standing there? I think he's the only Perler I met in person
tadzik tadzik.net/pub/core.25388 core dump from a moarvm segfault, if anyone's interested in looking into it. Seems like a GC bug 11:15
timotimo tadzik: it's kind of useless without debug symbols? 11:34
tadzik ah shite 11:35
where did I go wrong? I ran it with perl6-gdb-m, do I need to build it differenty to have them?
timotimo i have no idea how to work with core dumps effectively 11:38
you can just ship libmoar.so over i expect
tadzik: will you give me the libmoar.so you used? :) 11:55
tadzik yep, yep, coming up :)
timotimo will you also give the p6 code you ran? 11:58
or "what were you doing" or something
i don't want to waste too much effort on a known problem ;)
tadzik it was forestfire.pl :) 11:59
I tried to generate a profile data like yours
timotimo aha, did you forget to remove the SIGNAL tap?
tadzik hmm, can't say that I forget if I didn't know I have to :P 12:00
and yeah, with it removed it works
timotimo comment out the line starting with SIGNAL and that has "tap" in it
yeah, known bug: profiler explodes when you have multithreading active
tadzik I see 12:03
timotimo i mean ... instead of waiting longer to get tuits to fix that, we could output a warning where it would try to collect the data "threads were active. program is likely to crash, or profile is likely to be garbage" 12:07
nine lizmat: CompUnit::RepositoryRegistry.use-repository(CompUnit::Repository::Filesystem.new(:prefix('.')) 12:24
Geth nqp: 736835d80a | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | src/HLL/Compiler.nqp
Allow for extra config info to be shown from HLL

This uses the approach of a dynamic variable that, when called, will nqp::say whatever it thinks it needs to say as extra config information.
I tried just calling a subroutine: that also works, but spoils the global namespace even further: a dynamic variable only needs registration in a ... (6 more lines)
12:46
nqp: 4ac87728b0 | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | tools/build/MOAR_REVISION
Bump Moar to get nqp::rand_I fixes
¦ nqp: version bump brought these changes: github.com/MoarVM/MoarVM/compare/2...4-g6d5ea04
Zoffix nine: where did you dig up this module? github.com/zoffixznet/perl6-Ecosys...t/issues/1 12:59
nine: ah, it's still in META.list 13:01
Removed.
I was gonna do something with it, but now I forget what...
nine Zoffix: ok :) 13:02
Zoffix buggable: eco 13:04
buggable Zoffix, Out of 831 Ecosystem dists, 67 have warnings, 13 have errors, and 648 have no tags in META file. See modules.perl6.org/update.log for details
Zoffix I'm guessing the 13 errors is the META.info -> META6.json swapped by tadzik recently and the auto-META-renamer hasn't renamed them yet
nine Zoffix: soooo...regarding perl6-Ecosystem-Test, is it actually valid to have a module without source information in the ecosystem? What would the purpose be?
Zoffix nine: no idea. Judging by the name of the module, I'd figure I was gonna test what breaks when a module is missing source information 13:06
nine Well, now you've found something ;) 13:07
Zoffix And since it's been in it long enough for me to forget about it and nothing broke, I guess stuff doesn't care about missing source information
nine: I see it's even indexed by module.perl6.org and points to the right repo: modules.perl6.org/dist/Ecosystem::Test
Geth rakudo/nom: 67ab60dcb8 | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | src/core/Process.pm
Add support for $*SAY-ADDITIONAL-CONFIG-INFO

This is called whenever we do "perl6 -V". Implemented as a dynamic variable so that it remains invisible in the global namespace.
rakudo/nom: version bump brought these changes: github.com/perl6/nqp/compare/2017....8-g4ac8772
c240195ddc | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | tools/build/NQP_REVISION
rakudo/nom: version bump brought these changes: github.com/perl6/nqp/compare/2017....8-g4ac8772
95c5e1ffa8 | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | src/Perl6/Metamodel/BOOTSTRAP.nqp

So make sure we use atpos_s on $named_names
Zoffix And maybe the test was "Does our tooling even use the source information or can it figure out the source automagically?" 13:08
from the meta file URL
$ zef install Ecosystem::Test 13:09
===> Searching for: Ecosystem::Test
No such method 'IO' for invocant of type 'Any'
in code at /home/zoffix/.rakudobrew/moar-nom/install/share/perl6/site/sources/4B1D5A60B59D9541E13F76E0E2A2D550E0144053 (Zef::Client) line 184
At least something breaks :P
nine My meta2rpm script also broke 13:20
Zoffix heh 13:21
[TuxCM] This is Rakudo version 2017.04.3-227-g95c5e1ffa built on MoarVM version 2017.04-64-g6d5ea042 13:46
csv-ip5xs 2.450
test 12.525
test-t 4.227 - 4.341
csv-parser 13.008
nine, there you go. Sorry for the delay 13:47
nine m: say 4.227/2.450 13:50
camelia 1.725306
nine woohoo :)
Zoffix buggable: speed 5 13:55
buggable Zoffix, █▁▁▁▁ data for 2017-05-12–2017-05-12; range: 4.220s–6.181s; 42% faster
Zoffix lol
If only :P
buggable: speed 6
buggable Zoffix, ▂↑▁▁▁▃ data for 2017-05-11–2017-05-12; range: 4.220s–6.181s; 2% slower
Zoffix buggable: speed 20
buggable Zoffix, ▂▄▃▃▃▃▃▂▁▂▂▁▂▁▂↑▁▁▁▃ data for 2017-05-04–2017-05-12; range: 4.220s–6.181s; 2% slower
Zoffix That percentage calculator should probably be made smarter :) 13:57
Geth rakudo/nom: e2082a6987 | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | src/core/VM.pm
Remove unneeded and obsolete 'precomp-dir'
14:19
rakudo/nom: 94c4e7bf98 | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | src/core/Process.pm
Add $*DISTRO information to perl6 -V output
Zoffix just experienced an inadequate performance issue in production code :( 14:29
m: my @a = 1..12; for ('a' x 100 ~ " -- Jan-12-2017") xx 7180 { when /'-- ' [ Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec] '-' \d**2 '-' \d**4 / { } }; say now - INIT now 14:30
camelia 0.20802497
Zoffix m: my @a = 1..12; for ('a' x 100 ~ " -- Jan-12-2017") xx 7180 { when /'-- ' @a '-' \d**2 '-' \d**4 / { } }; say now - INIT now
camelia 3.1291016
Zoffix Though in actual script the second one was taking so long I just rewrote it in the terms of the first version :)
m: my @a = <Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec>; for ('a' x 100 ~ " -- Jan-12-2017") xx 7180 { when /'-- ' @a '-' \d**2 '-' \d**4 / { } }; say now - INIT now 14:31
camelia 3.2125608
Zoffix I think there's even a ticket for this one.
jnthn I think it's one of those cases where the mutability of @a makes it a tad tricky to optimize well 14:32
Zoffix Yeah
jnthn We may need some rules around that to allow less duplicate work
Zoffix There's a related ticket: rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id...et-history 14:33
jnthn For that case I think you get a significant speedup by typing the variable
m: my $a = 'foo'; for ('a' x 100 14:34
camelia 5===SORRY!5=== Error while compiling <tmp>
Unable to parse expression in parenthesized expression; couldn't find final ')'
at <tmp>:1
------> 3my $a = 'foo'; for ('a' x 1007⏏5<EOL>
expecting any of:
statement end
jnthn m: my $a = 'foo'; for ('a' x 100 ~ "foo") xx 1000 { /$a/ }; say now - INIT now
camelia 0.0032907
jnthn m: my $a = 'foo'; for ('a' x 100 ~ "foo") xx 10000 { /$a/ }; say now - INIT now 14:35
camelia 0.0240111
jnthn m: my Str $a = 'foo'; for ('a' x 100 ~ "foo") xx 10000 { /$a/ }; say now - INIT now
camelia 0.0238258
jnthn Hmm, I'm sure there was something like that
Zoffix Wouldn't it still be mutable? Like it could change on every iteration 14:36
jnthn Yeah, but it could call !LITERAL instead of !INTERPOLATE and avoid a check each time
timotimo why do we get so bad performance in that regex even though it starts with a literal? 14:41
hm, perhaps it'd be better to use ||@a there? 14:43
Geth rakudo/nom: 53df2aa8da | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | src/core/CompUnit/RepositoryRegistry.pm
Remove unused variable and its initialization
timotimo m: my @a = 1..12; for ('a' x 100 ~ " -- Jan-12-2017") xx 7180 { when /'-- ' ||@a '-' \d**2 '-' \d**4 / { } }; say now - INIT now 14:47
camelia 19.2803383
timotimo not better, eh?
m: my @a = 1..12; for ('a' x 100 ~ " -- Jan-12-2017") xx 7180 { when /'-- ' @a '-' \d**2 '-' \d**4 / { } }; say now - INIT now
camelia 2.9414239
timotimo m: my @a = 1..12; for ('a' x 100 ~ " -- Jan-12-2017") xx 7180 { when /'-- ' |@a '-' \d**2 '-' \d**4 / { } }; say now - INIT now
camelia (timeout) 14:48
Zoffix :o
timotimo huh what the ...
i thought @a is equivalent to either of those
Zoffix m: my @a = 1..12; for ('a' x 100 ~ " -- Jan-12-2017") xx 7180 { whe /'-- ' |@a '-' \d**2 '-' \d**4 / { } }; say now - INIT now
camelia 5===SORRY!5=== Error while compiling <tmp>
Unexpected block in infix position (missing statement control word before the expression?)
at <tmp>:1
------> 3 { whe /'-- ' |@a '-' \d**2 '-' \d**4 /7⏏5 { } }; say now - INIT now
expectin…
Zoffix It's equivalent to the |@a
Zoffix thought
m: my @a = 1..12; for ('a' x 100 ~ " -- Jan-12-2017") xx 718 { when /'-- ' |@a '-' \d**2 '-' \d**4 / { } }; say now - INIT now
timotimo that's also what i thought
Zoffix m: my @a = 1..12; for ('a' x 100 ~ " -- Jan-12-2017") xx 7 { when /'-- ' |@a '-' \d**2 '-' \d**4 / { } }; say now - INIT now 14:49
camelia (timeout)
0.31506473
Zoffix wow
m: my @a = 1..12; for ('a' x 100 ~ " -- Jan-12-2017") xx 100 { when /'-- ' |@a '-' \d**2 '-' \d**4 / { } }; say now - INIT now
camelia 4.269762
Zoffix m: my @a = 1..12; for ('a' x 100 ~ " -- Jan-12-2017") xx 100 { when /'-- ' ||@a '-' \d**2 '-' \d**4 / { } }; say now - INIT now
camelia 0.3336069
Zoffix m: my @a = 1..12; for ('a' x 100 ~ " -- Jan-12-2017") xx 100 { when /'-- ' @a '-' \d**2 '-' \d**4 / { } }; say now - INIT now
camelia 0.0607072
Zoffix m: say 4.269762/0.0607072
camelia 70.3337001
Zoffix apparently-equivalent but 70x slower
timotimo well well, we still have a lot of opportunities to improve these things 14:50
Zoffix files this one to keep a record
timotimo also, we could totally have a special case for Range objects in the regex engine
but that doesn't help your case at all 14:51
Zoffix There isn't a range there tho.
timotimo because you wanted an array of words
@a = 1..12
if you used $a instead, that'd be a different story
and the @$a in the regex?
Zoffix filed as rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131297 14:53
timotimo Zoffix: if you know you're looking for single words from an array, you could \w+ and check the values in a <?{ ... }>, wouldn't that perform better? 15:01
tadzik Zoffix: seems like I got it to work: imgur.com/a/LAaIG though it should probably not be so user-exposed
Zoffix timotimo: I just replaced it with literals and was done with it. It's a one-off script to update filenames 15:02
timotimo have a little "developer mode" button at the bottom like the docs have
ah, i didn't realize
tadzik maybe something like modules.perl6.org/problems-for/tadzik, which would just show me what I can fix in my stuf
Zoffix I just mentioned it 'cause it was proper production use of Perl 6 and I hit something that was LTA :) 15:03
timotimo that's fair
Zoffix tadzik: that looks awesome :)
tadzik :3 15:05
Zoffix .tell curt_ Our modules.perl6.org currently rejects logotypes that aren't 32x32px. Sent you a PR to fix yours: github.com/CurtTilmes/perl6-eredis/pull/1 15:15
yoleaux Zoffix: I'll pass your message to curt_.
Zoffix nine: if you're short on topics to talk about at PTS... we support these "logotypes" on modules.perl6.org but AFAIK they're entirely unspecced. 15:16
tadzik Zoffix: we could use Imager to resize them on the spot, would that be desirable>?
or Imagemagick or whatever else 15:17
Zoffix tadzik: feels like the wrong approach. We'd just be masking the problem instead of fixing it, especially since the filename has "32x32" in it. In the 800+ dists, this is only the second time a non-standard sized logotype appeared 15:21
tadzik ah, indeed. So it declares 32x32, but isn't, that's a Problem 15:22
something to put on the Problems list :P
lizmat so what's so special about val() that we don't have a proto sub val() in the setting, and we *do* have multi sub val()'s ? 16:17
Zoffix s: &val 16:22
SourceBaby Zoffix, Sauce is at github.com/rakudo/rakudo/blob/53df...hs.pm#L119
Zoffix shrugs
That would normally lead to a proto
Zoffix stabs in the dark and guesses the proto for it is made somewhere in the grammar because it uses val() to do things, doesn't it? 16:24
lizmat could be 16:26
Zoffix I think it using &val here... github.com/rakudo/rakudo/blob/nom/....nqp#L9433 16:28
lizmat yeah, but where does the proto live? 16:29
ah well, taking a different approach
dogbert17 Zoffix or lizmat: are you around? 17:07
Zoffix dogbert17: sup?
dogbert17 does gist.github.com/dogbert17/29095e64...c5aa9de53a look ok'ish?
tested in S32-container/buf.t 17:08
Zoffix dogbert17: looks good to me. That goes into doc/Type/Blob.pod6, right? 17:10
dogbert17 yup :)
lizmat dogbert17:
if you call it on a Buf, you get a Buf returned 17:11
m: say Buf.new([1, 2, 3]).reverse
camelia Buf:0x<03 02 01>
lizmat m: say Blob.new([1, 2, 3]).reverse
camelia Blob:0x<03 02 01>
lizmat not sure if that pod covers Buf as well
dogbert17 there's a separate pod for that 17:12
But I guess that I could put a 'copy' there as well
Zoffix would just replace one of those Blob examples with a Buf 17:13
('cause Buf does Blob)
dogbert17 that can be arranged
Geth rakudo/nom: b6496eda71 | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | src/core/Process.pm
Also add $*KERNEL info to perl6 -V output

At least for now
17:24
Zoffix m: sub prefix:<∑> ($x, $y, $z?) is looser(&infix:<,>) { dd [ $x, $y, $z ] }; say ∑ 1, 2; 17:26
camelia Too few positionals passed; expected 2 or 3 arguments but got 1
in sub prefix:<∑> at <tmp> line 1
in block <unit> at <tmp> line 1
Zoffix m: sub prefix:<∑> (*@ ($x, $y, $z?) ) is looser(&infix:<,>) { dd [ $x, $y, $z ] }; say ∑ 1, 2;
camelia [1, 2, Any]
Nil
Zoffix kinda weird it don't work for non-slurpies
jnthn A prefix only ever gets passed one argument 17:27
Postfixes too
Zoffix Ah 17:28
jnthn So far as the parser's concenred, a prefix operates on a single thing
They're parsed different to function calls and listops
Geth rakudo/nom: 0c46aff2bd | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | 2 files
Add support for $*KERNEL.archname

To be used by CPAN-testers
17:32
lizmat dinner&
dogbert17 m: say callframe(12) 17:47
camelia ctxcaller needs an MVMContext
in block <unit> at <tmp> line 1
dogbert17 there seems to be something wrong with the second (~10 lines long) CallFrame example on docs.perl6.org/type/CallFrame 17:56
it never enters the block after 'when CallFrame {', can anyone see why?
Zoffix m: callframe(1).^name.say 17:58
camelia CallFrame
Zoffix Ah doh
dogbert17: because when smartmatches against $_ not the $name the given block assigns the value to
s/$name/$frame/; 17:59
dogbert17 ah
should I change to: 18:00
given callframe($level) {
my $frame = $_;
perlpilot or just .... when $frame ~~ CallFrame { ... } 18:08
or eliminate the $frame variable entirely
dogbert17 perlpilot: thx, if I run a corrected example it prints out '(IterateOneWithoutPhasers)'. Is that the expected result? 18:10
Zoffix Yeah, it's one of the things handling the for loop
dogbert17 cool
Zoffix ZOFVM: Files=1229, Tests=135469, 109 wallclock secs (21.05 usr 2.87 sys + 2240.30 cusr 136.14 csys = 2400.36 CPU) 18:11
Geth rakudo/nom: 1c4d845196 | (Zoffix Znet)++ | lib/Test.pm6
Fix is-deeply for Junction args

Currently passing a Junction as one of the args threads `proclaim` call, causing several lines of duplicate-ish test output to be generated.
Fix by boolifying result first.
18:13
roast: 4682d963f9 | (Zoffix Znet)++ | S24-testing/9-is_deeply.t
Test `is-deeply` gives sane results for Junctions

Rakudo fix: github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/1c4d845196
18:14
Zoffix
.oO( a better fix is probably boolify the arg inside proclaim.... but I already turned off my VM... )
18:16
m: use Test; like "foo", any /bar/, /foo/ 18:18
camelia not ok 1 - text matches '/bar/'

# Failed test 'text matches '/bar/''
# at SETTING::src/core/Junction.pm line 249
# expected: '/bar/'
# got: 'foo'
ok 2 - text matches '/foo/'
Zoffix k
oh, like itself gets threaded 18:26
Geth rakudo/nom: 651f4b06ad | (Zoffix Znet)++ | lib/Test.pm6
Revert "Fix is-deeply for Junction args"

This reverts commit 1c4d845196b28b2e427e9df4799f092366e4a5f7.
  - Going to generalize the fix
18:30
rakudo/nom: dc5eece9ad | (Zoffix Znet)++ | lib/Test.pm6
Make `proclaim` Junction-safe

Take junctions as args and boolify them so that test routines that can work with Junctions don't need to remember to boolify their results before passing it to `proclaim`, to avoid duplicated output.
rakudo/js: 4051b6f8d2 | pmurias++ | gen/js/.gitignore
[js] Add a .gitignore for gen/js
18:32
rakudo/js: d7fb541e77 | pmurias++ | package.json
[js] Add a package.json so that stuff can be installed into node_modules
timotimo Zoffix: do you have an opinion on whether isa-ok should disarm Failure objects? especially when it's called like "isa-ok $the-failure, Failure" 20:12
Zoffix timotimo: that'll make toast fail 20:15
timotimo: irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6-dev/2017-...i_14364400 20:16
I mean roast fail
I'm actually making a new Test module ATM.... It ain't got an isa-ok at all. `is` smartmatches and so subsunes that use case. And it'll defuse failures too 20:20
subsumes
and like and isnt and unlike and does-ok and many cmp-ok usecases
m: use Test; like 'foo', none /bar/ 20:27
camelia not ok 1 - text matches '/bar/'

# Failed test 'text matches '/bar/''
# at SETTING::src/core/Junction.pm line 249
# expected: '/bar/'
# got: 'foo'
Zoffix Yeah, in my module you use none Junctions to specify unlike/isnt 20:28
timotimo ah, ok 20:29
i somehow missed when you first told me that
thanks
Zoffix Sauce for my module github.com/zoffixznet/perl6-Testo it's next on my todo list after IO grant and release 20:31
samcv have we ever done google summer of code? 20:55
tadzik only with Parrot I think
so, long ago :)
samcv we sshould do it again. google basically pays people to intern right?
tadzik my laptop sticker says 2014, and I think that was the last one 20:56
yep
perlpilot tadzik: that sounds about right. I think we did GSoc from 2009ish to 2014 and then TPF was rejected one year and then I lost track 21:20
samcv: we should participate in that other thing with high school students too, if we can. 21:22
tadzik Google Code-In 21:24
Geth rakudo/nom: ba0581d75b | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | src/core/set_operators.pm
Partial fix for RT #131300

Prevents (elem) and (cont) (and their Unicode counterparts) from infinilooping.
22:19
synopsebot6 Link: rt.perl.org/rt3/Public/Bug/Display...?id=131300
lizmat m: dd Bag.Set # tssskkk 22:25
camelia Cannot look up attributes in a Bag type object
in block <unit> at <tmp> line 1
timotimo ttjjss? :) 22:28
lizmat I will look at the other problem cases tomorrow, after some sleep 22:31
good night, #perl6-dev!
tadzik timotimo: wha :) 22:35
jnthn 'night, lizmat++ 22:36
Zoffix .tell lizmat FWIW the ba0581d75b fix now gives False for cases that are, say `Int ∋ Int`; Perhaps Set:U.Set should return set(Set) as it does for other type objects? 22:56
yoleaux Zoffix: I'll pass your message to lizmat.