Zoffix | 🍝 | 04:02 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
yoleaux | 19 Nov 2017 09:21Z <ufobat_> Zoffix: I've updated the PR github.com/rakudo/rakudo/pull/1249 with your suggestions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[Tux] |
|
06:58 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retry was better, | 07:09 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rakudo version 2017.10-215-g85105077a - MoarVM version 2017.10-86-g89fae17a6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
masak | wait, you're allowed to re-run the perf test if it looks slow? :P | 07:14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
this changes everything! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[Tux] | masak, if I see a (big) change, I run it a second (actually a third and forth run as it already runs twice per test) to check if it was not influenced by heavy load | 07:33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I do this when I see a change both upwards and downwards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
masak | :) | 07:34 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[Tux] | off to work | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nine | I always take downward jumps at face value. Because there's just no spurious event that could make a program run too fast. If anything the lowest runtime reflects the actual resource usage of a program best. | 07:37 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
yoleaux | 19 Nov 2017 22:13Z <geekosaur> nine: [19 21:36:17] <Brumbazz> Hi guys. I'm using AnyEvent-XMPP(perl5) in my perl6 project. So far I don't get any errors during compilation when I run my script, however after it print's some text is crashed with a "[2] 708 segmentation fault perl6 xmpp_who_am_i.pl" | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
masak | during the weekend I got `macro infix:<ff>` to work primitively in 007. this is a significant step up from what Rakudo currently supports. I'm hopeful I'll be able to land this in 007's master branch soon. | 07:41 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nine | masak: sounds like it would get us closer to a LINQ like sublanguage implemented as macros? | 07:50 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geth | roast: 05c0fd8365 | (Samantha McVey)++ | S15-unicode-information/uniprop.t uniprop: Add tests for every General Category Tests to close rakudo/rakudo#1254 |
08:07 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
synopsebot | RAKUDO#1254 [closed]: github.com/rakudo/rakudo/issues/1254 [regression][testneeded][UNI][⚠ blocker ⚠] Incorrect General_Category property for ascii-range uppercase letters (say ‘A’.uniprop) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
masak | nine: quite possibly | 08:10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I still don't feel ready to think about all-out slangs for some reason, but I'd like to move into treating 007 expressions as not something that necessarily gets evaluated but the structure gets used for other things | 08:11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
see github.com/masak/007/issues/268 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AlexDaniel | timotimo: I guess this doesn't really help? github.com/rakudo/rakudo/issues/12...-345680579 | 12:23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I no longer see any hopes for GH#1257 fix in this release, so here: github.com/rakudo/rakudo/issues/12...-345723351 | 15:08 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
synopsebot | GH#1257 [open]: github.com/rakudo/rakudo/issues/1257 [regression][⚠ blocker ⚠] Rakudo 2017.10 fails to build on Debian big endian systems | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AlexDaniel | please comment if you agree, disagree or whatever | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
moritz | we'd need a CI system on a big endian machine | 15:11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AlexDaniel | the same ticket talks about some other issue on arm, which may be a little bit easier to fix I think | 15:14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
but then there's this also: irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2017-11-20#i_15472974 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geth | nqp/master: 7 commits pushed by pmurias++
|
15:20 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ilmari | when did Geth start including the branch name for commits to the default branch? | 15:22 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[Coke] | probably when the default branch was changed? | 15:33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
timotimo | oh, huh. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[Coke] | (on rakudo, I mean. but Iunno) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
timotimo | nqp has the same problem | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
or "has that problem" | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
just last night the reports for both rakudo and nqp didn't have the default branch name | 15:37 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
actually, it was the day before last night | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[Coke] | ah, good catch | 15:56 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geth | geth: 6ad5fe6e28 | (Zoffix Znet)++ (committed using GitHub Web editor) | lib/Geth/GitHub/Hooks/Preprocessor.pm6 Fix nqp bump watcher Fixes #11 |
16:00 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
rakudo: 8ccb60e39f | (Zoffix Znet)++ (committed using GitHub Web editor) | .gitignore Add /*.dll.a to ignore These get generated on Windows during make test. |
16:51 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
tyil | I want to implement the EXISTS-KEY method for Distribution::Resources in Rakudo (used for %?RESOURCES), so I can use :exists and :!exists on it, would anyone with more knowledge have any outright objections as to why this could be unwanted or undoable before I spend time tring to understand it better? | 17:28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
japhb | nine, re "there's just no spurious event that could make a program run too fast" -- that presupposes that the program 1. completed successfully, and 2. gave the correct answer. Failure to detect those two cases has resulted in many bad benchmark results, where faster-but-wrong or faster-but-crashed-partway-through were unnoticed. | 17:56 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[Coke] | I have fallen into that trap before. "my god, this is faster than the thing I ported it from!" "oh, right, because it gave the wrong answer REALLY fast." :) | 18:03 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ugexe | m: say $*VM.desc; # what is this intended to mean? | 18:49 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
camelia | 2017-11-20T19:49:10.602511+01:00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ugexe | m: say $*VM.desc; # what is this intended to mean? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
camelia | 2017-11-20T19:49:18.268098+01:00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ugexe | here is a timestamp that represents the first time you called .desc ? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AlexDaniel | huh… the timestamp is introduced in this commit and there's no explanation: github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/db...d772eefc15 | 18:54 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
before that commit it was just an unitialized Str | 18:55 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lizmat | . | 19:11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
yoleaux | 19 Nov 2017 15:56Z <AlexDaniel> lizmat: gist.github.com/AlexDaniel/bf7d916...604981b70e | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ugexe | yea but that was when it was $?VM, which makes sense | 19:39 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
for $*VM, not so much | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lizmat | tyil: irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6-dev/2017-...i_15474137 can't think of any reason against it | 19:41 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
tyil | alright, I'll take a serious look at it :> | 20:33 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lizmat | and another Perl 6 Weekly hits the Net: p6weekly.wordpress.com/2017/11/20/...ia-videos/ | 22:28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
El_Che | ha, I made it to the paper :) | 22:36 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lizmat | :-) | 22:38 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lizmat feels knackered and goes to bed | 22:43 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
& | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
El_Che | thx lizmat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
great job |