6.2.10 released! xrl.us/hxnb | geoffb's column (/. ed): xrl.us/hxhk | pugscode.org | pugs.kwiki.org | paste: feather.perl6.nl:8888/ | www.geeksunite.net Set by Juerd on 20 October 2005. |
|||
Juerd | buu: Hm? | 00:02 | |
wolverian: You can use the mail server on feather if you wish | 00:03 | ||
wolverian: If it's temporary | |||
buu | Juerd: You are freaky. | ||
Juerd | wolverian: ssh -L 2525:127.0.0.1:25 feather.perl6.nl, then use localhost:2525 while the ssh connection lasts | 00:04 | |
buu: Why? | |||
wolverian | Juerd, nah, it'll pass, I think. I'm too tired to start doing weird stuff now. :) I'm just wondering when postfix will pick it up again from deferred... | 00:06 | |
Juerd | wolverian: weird? | 00:07 | |
buu | Juerd: 'oliebol' | ||
wolverian | Juerd, as in, 'things I haven't done before' | ||
Juerd | wolverian: It's a port forward. ssh listens locally (-L), and connects on the remote host | ||
wolverian: And the rest of ssh you probably did use before. Or so I hope. | |||
wolverian | Juerd, oh, right - I don't have to configure anything locally? | ||
Juerd | wolverian: Indeed | ||
wolverian: Well, your MTA or MUA, to use the forwarded connection (localhost:2525) | 00:08 | ||
wolverian | right | ||
Juerd | buu: Oh, that's a dutch old/new year's delecasy (tastes like a sponge, though) | 00:15 | |
buu: The fun is that you can type 7083170 on a calculator, rotate it 180, and see this word. | |||
buu | Juerd: Fascinating! | ||
wolverian | hmm. | ||
Juerd | buu: Likewise, lol + lol results in hihi. "lol" is Dutch for "fun", "hihi" sounds like "heehee", giggling. | ||
buu: Even better: "heleboel" (73083734), which means "a great many" | 00:16 | ||
Which, for a number, is very meaningful | |||
wolverian | shouldn't a bounced message come back to me? | ||
Juerd | wolverian: Yes, but very often the "me" isn't so clear. | 00:17 | |
wolverian | right. | ||
Juerd | wolverian: Are you using feather now? | ||
wolverian | no. I just think I've misconfigured the envelope address again here. | ||
Juerd | I can have a look in the logs if you want | ||
Oh, ok | |||
wolverian | I forgot what to do with it. | ||
Juerd | Ah,Ah | ||
s/Ah,// | |||
wolverian | and it's bouncing to the e-mail address that this server does _not_ deliver for | ||
Juerd | The envelope from is important, yes :) | ||
buu | holy fucking shit | 00:18 | |
wolverian | how did I set that up, again? | ||
sorry to be such a bother | |||
Juerd | How should I know? I don't remember all that stuff :) | ||
wolverian | at least this time I figured what's wrong myself | ||
hehe :) | |||
Juerd | buu: Hm? :) | ||
buu | Juerd: It's saturday =[ | ||
Juerd | wolverian: On an average day, I help out four to five people on IRC. I really do not remember much of it afterwards. | 00:19 | |
wolverian | :) | ||
buu | I thought it was still friday | ||
Holy shit! | |||
wolverian | okay, man 5 postconf helps. thanks | ||
Juerd | buu: It's Sunday here. | ||
buu | Juerd: I'm actually at work! | ||
Juerd | buu: So was I, an hour ago. | ||
buu | Juerd: I shouldn't be! | 00:20 | |
Juerd | For personal matters, but still | ||
wolverian | hmm. | ||
Juerd | I want a sheet of orange reflector plastic. | ||
Why is that so hard to find? | |||
wolverian | what should I put in as the envelope from? | ||
wolverian@localhost? :) | |||
Juerd | wolverian: The address you want bounces delivered to. | ||
wolverian | well | ||
that's actually fine as it is now | 00:21 | ||
Juerd | wolverian: And preferably, the same address you use in the From: header, if you care (I have it set to something different on purpose) | ||
wolverian | it's just that when my postfix can't connect to the relay, it's bouncing things to an address it can't deliver to | ||
Juerd | wolverian: @localhost not. It must be externally deliverable. | ||
wolverian | (since it would have to go through the relay) | ||
which is weird. I would have thought the canonical mapping would have kicked in | |||
Juerd | wolverian: Ah, the relay is the server that also happens to handle mail for the envelope from domain? | 00:22 | |
wolverian: 'cause that's a classic example of why that shouldn't be the same :) | |||
wolverian | Juerd, no, it's not. :) | ||
Juerd | (It very commonly is, though) | ||
I don't know postfix. Last time I tried, I found it way too complex. | |||
wolverian | Juerd, the server postfix runs on is non-deliverable (it uses fetchmail). it fetches mail from helsinki.fi, and relays to mail.inet.fi | 00:23 | |
Juerd | I know the protocol in detail, I know how many unix things work, but that wasn't enough to grok postfix. | ||
wolverian | if mail.inet.fi bounces, postfix tries to send through it again, to my helsinki.fi address | ||
which is obviously retarded. | |||
Juerd, right. | |||
Juerd | I prefer qmail :) | ||
wolverian | I tried to make it play nice with the university relay as well | 00:24 | |
but I just could not make the SSL auth work. | |||
Juerd | wolverian: Why is that retarded? I fail to see the obviousness. | ||
wolverian | Juerd, oh. it's retarded because the relay is itself broken | ||
Juerd, I guess it can't know that. | |||
s,it,postfix, | |||
Juerd | wolverian: That has nothing to do with the other configuration though :) | ||
wolverian: You should have multiple relays :) | |||
wolverian | right. | ||
Juerd | Not that that is possible for most people | 00:25 | |
wolverian | I'd use the university one if postfix would just connect to it | ||
but I get a VERY unhelpful "Connection closed." | |||
Juerd | Use a proxy | ||
And listen locally, unencrypted | |||
Move the SSL out of the complex beast into something you can debug. | |||
wolverian | argh. :) | 00:26 | |
I don't know the protocol well enough yet | |||
to feel safe doing that | |||
albeit I guess CPAN has something to do exactly that | |||
Juerd | it goes like helo, 2xx, mail from: [email@hidden.address] 2xx, rcpt to: [email@hidden.address] 2xx, data, Subject: Hello, World\n\nHi!\n.\n | 00:27 | |
wolverian | auth? | ||
Juerd | 2xx | ||
wolverian: Oh, you need authentication. That sucks :) | |||
wolverian | I _think_ I do. | ||
Juerd | Don't think before trying | 00:28 | |
wolverian | I don't know what SASL is and if I need that, or just SSL, or if they are the same thing | ||
Juerd | Hm | ||
Usually I give opposite advice. | |||
wolverian | hehe. ;) | ||
Juerd | But in this case trying won't hurt | ||
wolverian | right | ||
Juerd | SASL is smtp auth. | ||
Not related to SSL | |||
Except for spelling | |||
wolverian | ah. thanks | 00:30 | |
I need TLS, I think. | 00:31 | ||
Juerd | TLS is SSL, practically | ||
It's newer. | |||
Very often, when people say SSL, they mean TLS | |||
wolverian | yeah, knew that. I just think I tried it already | ||
maybe my ISP doesn't like :25 though | |||
(sucks) | |||
Juerd | I have a so much easier setup | 00:32 | |
An always-connected, always-on box that's entirely publicly reachable. | |||
wolverian | but you have a host that is deliverable, right? :) | ||
right. :) | |||
I would use the university server and run mutt there, but it's SunOS and entirely fucked up. | |||
Juerd | I get to ssh to it and read my mail from anywhere | ||
wolverian | its procmail is from 1995, or something like that. | ||
Juerd | 1995 didn't have enough spam for procmail to be designed for it :) | 00:33 | |
Same for sendmail | |||
Be big, fork a lot, use memory, be generally inefficient? Sure, why not? | 00:34 | ||
wolverian | wait, I also need to authenticate | ||
Juerd | Oh, and security? Why'd you waste your time on that. | ||
wolverian | is that SASL? | ||
Juerd | Very probably | ||
wolverian | argh. | ||
Juerd | Authentication on a relay. I've never used that. | ||
I'm used to IP-based authorization on relays. | 00:35 | ||
wolverian | it's for the intraweb only, outsiders have to auth | ||
intranet, rather | |||
Juerd | That's the common setup, yes | 00:36 | |
wolverian | this is so ridiculously complex compared to just using, say, Evolution | 00:39 | |
I'm a sucker for using mutt. | |||
:) | |||
s,using mutt,following the unix | 00:40 | ||
mail principles, | |||
thankyou enter. | |||
Juerd | Trying to follow unix mail principles in a very limited environment | 00:46 | |
wolverian | true enough | ||
Juerd | Unix is nice, but it doesn't cope very well with being disconnected | ||
wolverian | I just want to see my mail whenever I screen -r :) | ||
Juerd | Of course! | 00:47 | |
Best advice I can give you is to get a shell account on a well connected box somewhere. | |||
wolverian | like feather? :) | 00:48 | |
Juerd | Yes, but not like feather in that feather is for Perl 6 stuff only | ||
wolverian | yeah. it's not that my box isn't connected - it just doesn't have a name | 00:49 | |
(that others could see :) | |||
Juerd | Then get a hostname. | ||
There are a million ways to do this. | |||
Including a few dozen free dynamic dns services | |||
wolverian | I'm a poor student etc. yeah, I will. | ||
Juerd | More important is that you can receive connections on port 25 | 00:50 | |
Many ISPs block this | |||
That's because most servers are by default open relays. | |||
wolverian | oh, but if I want the box to be deliverable, dyndns isn't enough, is it? | ||
Juerd | dyndns would be enough, provided that ingress port 25 is not blocked. | ||
wolverian | it is not | 00:51 | |
Juerd | When mail is delivered, the MX record is checked first | ||
If there is no MX record, the A record is used. | |||
wolverian | and I do have a dynamic address | ||
Juerd | feather.perl6.nl has no MX record. It doesn't need any, because the same box handles mail. | ||
What's the address? | |||
wolverian | chronoa.dy.fi | ||
Juerd | Remote host said: 554 [email@hidden.address] Relay access denied | 00:52 | |
Okay, now start accepting mail for it :) | |||
wolverian | heh. | ||
dy.fi also allows me to set an MX record | |||
which isn't needed, I guess. | |||
Juerd | You don't need any | ||
wolverian | right. | 00:53 | |
Juerd | That's for when the mail server is ANOTHER host | ||
wolverian | I think I'd only use [email@hidden.address] as the envelope from, though | ||
hm. | |||
Juerd | That's very possible | ||
And possibly a good idea | |||
I use a different envelope from because I want to kill all bounces that are sent to other addresses :) | |||
wolverian | right | ||
Juerd | (This prevents lots of spam and spam bounces) | 00:54 | |
wolverian | it also prevents from bounces being bounced back because there's only one relay | ||
Juerd | Lots in my case being a few hundred messages per day, on peak days | ||
wolverian | (which is broken) | ||
Juerd | It's still not accepting mail ;) | ||
wolverian | heh. | 00:55 | |
I'm still thinking about this | |||
because, for me, it only fixes the particular situation that the relay is broken | |||
it might be better to just find more relays | |||
Juerd | It also makes bounces more reliable | ||
Because there's a step less. | 00:56 | ||
wolverian | true | ||
Juerd | It makes bounces be push, rather than pull | ||
Which means you get them sooner. Which means you can react quicker, and waste less of other people's time. | |||
And it makes local configuration mistakes not travel to your provider, only to find out that this doesn't work either :) | 00:57 | ||
In other words: debug info! :) | |||
Good night | 01:11 | ||
Blicero | does pugs do threading yet | 01:21 | |
Cryptic_K | dinner | 02:36 | |
bbl | |||
wolverian | Juerd, it accepts mail now. | 03:11 | |
SplinterFL | Does anyone in here travel from 'The West to the East' aka a 'traveling man'? | 04:19 | |
woog | 980406,1607,1612,1602,16why? | 05:23 | |
980406,1607,1612,1602,16who is online? | |||
woog 980406,1607,1612,1602,16pp | 05:24 | ||
woog 980406,1607,1612,1602,16ōæ½xC0ōæ½xCAōæ½xC9ōæ½xF9Ėµōæ½xB5ōæ½xC0: "ōæ½xBDōæ½xF1ōæ½xB7ōæ½xACōæ½xC1ōæ½xBCōæ½xCEōæ½xEE, ōæ½xBAōæ½xC0ōæ½xD0Ė²ōæ½xBBĒ³, ōæ½xCBōæ½xFBōæ½xC8ōæ½xD5ōæ½xBDōæ½xADōæ½xBAōæ½xFEōæ½xCFōæ½xE0ōæ½xB7ōæ½xEA, ōæ½xD4ōæ½xD9ōæ½xB5ōæ½xB1ōæ½xB1ōæ½xADōæ½xBEōæ½xC6ōæ½xD1Ō»ōæ½xB6. ōæ½xD4ōæ½xDBōæ½xC3ōæ½xC7ōæ½xBEōæ½xCDōæ½xB4ōæ½xCBōæ½xB1ōæ½xF0ōæ½xB9ōæ½xFD." Ėµōæ½xD7ōæ½xC5ōæ½xC5ōæ½xDBōæ½xD0ōæ½xE4Ņ»ōæ½xB7ōæ½xF7, ʮȻōæ½xC0ōæ½xEBōæ½xBFōæ½xAA #perl6 | 05:28 | ||
dduncan | wha? | 05:43 | |
woog, use the utf8 encoding on your IRC client ... it works better | 05:44 | ||
QtPlatypus | I don't think he is here. | 05:45 | |
autrijus | good morning! | 07:33 | |
dirtsimple.org/2005/10/children-of-...ython.html # nice read about PyPy | |||
clkao | i heard they are targetting js as well | 07:38 | |
from the python lightning talks | |||
autrijus | I think that is wonderful. | 07:40 | |
dynamic languages has long eschewed compiler technologies | |||
but that is unavoidable if they are to go "mainstream". | 07:41 | ||
(as in, survive in a static, IDE-dominated, heterogenous environment) | |||
clkao | we should get heterogenous source control working | 07:43 | |
obra | good morning, autrikus | 07:45 | |
Where are you? | |||
xerox | Let me find an url about type inference in pypy, it's sort of a reverse Hindley-Milner :-) | ||
codespeak.net/pypy/dist/pypy/doc/dr...ation.html | 07:46 | ||
autrijus | obra: first row | 07:50 | |
Khisanth | ?eval "A".."C" Ā„ 1 | 07:52 | |
evalbot_7700 | Error: unexpected "\\" expecting operator, "does", "but", "is", "^..^", "cmp", "<=>", "^..", "..^", "..", postfix conditional, postfix loop, postfix iteration, ";" or end of input | ||
obra | autrijus: ahh. exactly hidden behind borup | 07:54 | |
xerox | Khisanth: what does Ā„ do? | ||
Khisanth | zip :) | 07:55 | |
Ā„ looks like a zipper :P | |||
xerox | A zipper, or Haskell's zip? | ||
ahaha, I see what you mean. | |||
spinclad | rafl: installation report: pugs* install, libghc6-pugs-dev fails in post-install. | ||
Khisanth | I think both zip does the same | ||
xerox | ?eval ("A","B","C") Ā„ (1,2,3) | 07:56 | |
spinclad | rafl: Setting up libghc6-pugs-dev (6.2.10-2) ... | ||
evalbot_7700 | Error: unexpected "\\" expecting operator, postfix conditional, postfix loop, postfix iteration, ";" or end of input | ||
spinclad | rafl: /var/lib/dpkg/info/libghc6-pugs-dev.postinst: line 8: /usr/lib/ghc-6.4/bin/ghc-pkg: No such file or directory | ||
Khisanth | what \?! | ||
spinclad | rafl: dpkg: error processing libghc6-pugs-dev (--configure): | ||
rafl: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127 | |||
Khisanth | ?eval "A".."C" Ā»Ā„Ā« 1 | 07:57 | |
evalbot_7700 | Error: unexpected "\\" expecting operator, "does", "but", "is", "^..^", "cmp", "<=>", "^..", "..^", "..", postfix conditional, postfix loop, postfix iteration, ";" or end of input | ||
xerox | Khisanth: doesn't zip take two lists? I'm a perl6-too-much-newbie :) | ||
spinclad | rafl: (end of install log segment) | ||
autrijus | network still spotty :/ | ||
Khisanth | xerox: I could have sworn that what you wrote used to work :) | ||
xerox | Woot. | ||
Khisanth: Ā»fooĀ« ā½ | |||
Khisanth | Ā»opĀ« :) | 07:58 | |
xerox | Still obscure. | ||
A-la `op` ? | |||
pugs> ("A","B","C") Ā„ (1,2,3) | 08:01 | ||
("A", 1, "B", 2, "C", 3) | |||
Version: 6.2.10 (r7636) | 08:02 | ||
bbl | |||
Khisanth | xerox: the Ā»opĀ« is the "hyper" version of op | 08:03 | |
xerox | ...that is... ? | ||
Khisanth | (or at least it was assuming someone didn't change their mind -_-) | ||
spinclad | rafl: i upgraded ghc and related packages to 6.4.1-1 and such, so that i could install pugs* 6.2.10-2; | ||
xerox | Ā»Ā„Ā« does not work in my pugs | 08:04 | |
Khisanth | hmm it probably shouldn't | ||
xerox | What does "hyper" means, anyway? | ||
mean, even | |||
Khisanth | ?eval (1..3) Ā»+Ā« 1 | ||
evalbot_7700 | Error: unexpected "\\" expecting operator, postfix conditional, postfix loop, postfix iteration, ";" or end of input | ||
sky_ | ?eval quit | ||
evalbot_7700 | Error: No compatible subroutine found: "&quit" | ||
Khisanth | ok so the bot appears broken | ||
autrijus | the bot's utf8 handling is indeed quite broken | 08:05 | |
spinclad | rafl: but libghc6-pugs-dev still refers to /usr/lib/ghc-6.4/... . | ||
sky_ | ?eval exit | ||
evalbot_7700 | Error: No compatible subroutine found: "&exit" | ||
autrijus | ?eval (1..3) >>+<< 1 | ||
obra | ?eval die | ||
evalbot_7700 | (2, 3, 4) | ||
Error: Died | |||
sky_ | ?eval CORE::exit | ||
evalbot_7700 | Error: No compatible subroutine found: "&CORE::exit" | ||
autrijus | ?eval %ENV | ||
evalbot_7700 | \undef | ||
autrijus | ;) | ||
xerox | (1..10) Ā»+Ā« 1 works, cool. | 08:06 | |
sky_ | ?eval eval "sub foo { exit(1) }" | ||
evalbot_7700 | Error: No compatible subroutine found: "&exit" | ||
xerox | How does it differ from a 'map' ? | ||
sky_ | evil | ||
spinclad | xerox: @a >>binop<< @b maps over both lists: | 08:08 | |
?eval ("a", "b", "c") >>Y<< (1, 2, 3) | |||
evalbot_7700 | Error: unexpected ">" expecting operator, postfix conditional, postfix loop, postfix iteration, ";" or end of input | ||
xerox | like lisp, in some sense | ||
autrijus | spinclad: Y is listfix not infix | ||
so isn't subject to >><< | |||
spinclad | yes, sorry | ||
xerox | ?eval (1..10) >>+<< (10..1) | 08:09 | |
evalbot_7700 | (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) | ||
autrijus chuckles | |||
?eval 10..1 | |||
evalbot_7700 | pugs: Prelude.tail: empty list | ||
Khisanth | ?eval (1..10) Y (1) | ||
evalbot_7700 | (1, 1, 2, undef, 3, undef, 4, undef, 5, undef, 6, undef, 7, undef, 8, undef, 9, undef, 10, undef) | ||
xerox | autrijus: what does listfix mean? | ||
autrijus | thanks, that's a bug. fixing | ||
spinclad | ?eval ("a", "b", "c") >>~<< ('1', '2', '3') | ||
evalbot_7700 | ("a1", "b2", "c3") | ||
autrijus | xerox: it means that "foo Y bar Y baz" evalutes the entire foo/bar/baz at once | ||
xerox: instead of being left or right biased | 08:10 | ||
i.e. (a Y b Y c) is not ((a Y b) Y c) | |||
xerox | ?eval ("a", "b") >>~<< ('1', '2') >>~<< ('x', 'y') | ||
evalbot_7700 | ("a1x", "b2y") | ||
autrijus | neiter is it (a Y (b Y c)) | ||
xerox | fold rejecting its r or l :) | ||
xerox & | 08:11 | ||
Khisanth | didn't the bot's unicode handling used to work or was that just svnbot6? | 08:14 | |
spinclad | how about ((1, 2), (3, 4)) >>Y<< (('a',), ('b', 'c')) # => ((1, 'a', 2), (3, 'b', 4, 'c')) ? | 08:16 | |
autrijus | Khisanth: that's just svnbot | 08:17 | |
spinclad hallucinates >>listop<< is listop | |||
autrijus | I have no idea :) | 08:18 | |
sky_ | make perl5-test? | ||
autrijus | make smoke-perl5 | ||
make test-perl5 | |||
sky_ | oki | 08:19 | |
ERROR from evaluation of /Users/sky/Documents/Hack/pugs/ext/Language-AttributeGrammar/Makefile.PL: syntax error at ./Makefile.PL line 7, near "'Attribute grammars for computations over trees';" | 08:42 | ||
svn head | |||
autrijus | sky_: fix it? :) | 08:44 | |
sky_ | hahaha | ||
:) | |||
autrijus | I think you can fix it in no time | ||
Khisanth | "you report it, you fix it!" | ||
sky_ | autrijus: if you go on evakitty.evaair.com/ with me | ||
autrijus | that will also motivate you to add your name to AUTHORS | ||
sky_ | :p | ||
autrijus | oh well, I fixed it :) r7701 | 08:47 | |
sky_ | crap, I was trying to :) | ||
autrijus | sorry for my impatience :) | 08:49 | |
sky_ tries pushing | 08:50 | ||
xerox wants more glyph-operators :-) | |||
svnbot6 | r7701 | autrijus++ | * Fix Makefile.PL for Language::AttributeGrammar (missing right parens), | ||
r7701 | autrijus++ | as reported by Arthur "sky" Bergman. | |||
r7701 | autrijus++ | * Add sky to AUTHORS. | |||
Khisanth | xerox: there are already too many! | ||
xerox | But I do not know them! | ||
sky_ | crap | ||
autrijus | sky_: sowwie... I can revert my change! | 08:51 | |
sky_ | don't | ||
autrijus | cool | ||
xerox | sky_: are you the same #haskell #scheme sky? :) | ||
sky_ | my login details aren't working | ||
xerox: no | |||
autrijus | sky_: mm, we can fix it over lunch | ||
xerox | kay. | ||
autrijus | xerox: that's ski | ||
ski != sky | |||
xerox | Whoops. | ||
S K I :-) | |||
Still playing with Ā„... how can I get its type? I tried with ref but I couldn't succeed. | 09:41 | ||
Khisanth | not sure if that sort of thing has been "specced" yet :) | 09:42 | |
xerox | Woot. | ||
That's why it works both on '0' and '(0)' ? | 09:43 | ||
Khisanth | not sure what you mean by that | ||
xerox | Isn't 0 :: Int and (0) :: list of Ints ? | ||
integral | is there a difference between 0 and (0) as rvalues? | ||
Khisanth | 0 and (0) are both a list one item :) | 09:44 | |
xerox | Hm. | ||
integral | () isn't a list constructor, xerox. That's more ,'s job | ||
xerox | Ah. | ||
integral | but OTOH on a left-hand side (where context comes from) () can sometimes make the context jump from item to list afaik | ||
xerox | And a string is not a list, too? | 09:45 | |
integral | of course not ;-) | ||
xerox | :-| | ||
integral | and list in perl doesn't really mean cons-list like in scheme/haskell | 09:46 | |
xerox | Sadly :-) | ||
integral | hmm, I'm not sure. I prefer to hide it's structual recursion inside map/fold, which is just like using for/map in perl | ||
xerox | What's the most common/used data structure in perl6? | 09:48 | |
Khisanth | hash, array and scalar? ;) | ||
xerox | Hmm, it probably could sound as a stupid question - but I mean like how lists are heavily used in Haskell programs, or such. | ||
Ooh-kay. | 09:49 | ||
I just can't find something to play with :-) | |||
Is there a way to do .pod => whatever_looks_nice_enough ? | 10:07 | ||
rafl | spinclad: Thanks for the report | 10:10 | |
scook0 | xerox: trying to read PODs? | 10:11 | |
I usually use pod2man or pod2html | |||
integral | perldoc does the normal manpage type viewing of pod | 10:13 | |
xerox | scook0: Yes, I am. I'll try, thanks. | ||
rafl | Is there a way to tag something using svk without using the normal trunk/, tags/ layout of subversion? | 10:45 | |
integral | sure, just make up a work which isn't trunk, tags, etc. I just copy stuff into my own //branches/foobar | 10:48 | |
rafl | integral: Well, that's only local then, isn't it? | 10:53 | |
integral | sure | ||
rafl | Well, that doesn't help me. | 10:54 | |
integral | but as another answer, you can use a copy from anywhere to anywhere to "tag" something. you don't need the standard layout | ||
rafl | Yes, of course. | 10:55 | |
integral | Well both of those things answer you question... | ||
rafl | Yes, thought I could avoid copying and therfor changing the layout. | 10:57 | |
integral | I suppose you could write down revision numbers on a piece of paper ;-) | ||
rafl | I suppose I can't. I don't even have a pen.. :-) | 10:58 | |
integral | heh | ||
svnbot6 | r7702 | clkao++ | Don't build (stalled) perl5/ directories that doesn't have | 11:57 | |
r7702 | clkao++ | Makefile.PL. | |||
rafl | clkao: Just a "do the right thing" fix, right? There isn't a directory without a Makefile.PL there.. | 11:59 | |
clkao | ya, because i have a stalled blondie directory | ||
obra | clkao: poke sky? | ||
clkao | it was moved, but i already have some file built before, so svk didn't remove it for me | 12:00 | |
man, that's bad: | 12:18 | ||
clkao:~/work/pugs clkao$ time ./pugs -B Perl5 -e 'say "OK"' | |||
Use of uninitialized value in string at /Users/clkao/work/pugs/perl5/PIL-Run/lib/PIL/Run/ApiX.pm line 59. | |||
OKundefundef | |||
real 4m2.446s | |||
4 min to say hello world :~ | |||
and it's telling me additional undef! | 12:20 | ||
petykoo | hi | 14:36 | |
is this perl6.2.10 "stable", or just development yet? | 14:39 | ||
wolverian | development. | 14:40 | |
there is no perl6.2.10, only pugs 6.2.10 | |||
see www.pugscode.org | |||
petykoo | ok | 14:41 | |
and is it known when will be the 6.0.0 perl? | |||
or a roadmap or sg like that? | |||
wolverian | the pugs roadmap is on pugscode.org | 14:42 | |
petykoo | coz there were interesting perfomances on the 1st hungarian perl conf, and i want to learn perl, but decided to wait till 6, coz it will be much different from the current 5 | 14:43 | |
or is it usable now? | 14:48 | ||
wolverian | it'll be a while before the stable release of perl6. in the meantime, you can use pugs, which is not complete but does run many perl6 programs already. | ||
petykoo | ok | 14:49 | |
moskvax | i was thinking about that sort of thing actually | ||
petykoo | i think i can wait... | ||
moskvax | i guess it isn't really worth starting to learn perl 5 now when much of it will change | 14:50 | |
Juerd | It is | ||
moskvax | but i can't find anything written about perl 6 towards someone who knows no perl 5 | ||
Juerd | It'll take quite some time before 6 is out | ||
And knowing 5 will help you understand 6 | 14:51 | ||
petykoo | hmm | ||
Juerd | The first books released will probably focus on people moving from 5 to 6 | ||
petykoo | but if i start to learn perl5 and regex and stuff, i can drop almost the half of my knowledge... | ||
i'll have to, i mean | 14:52 | ||
Juerd | No | ||
You'll have skills. And skills have nothing to do with the language in question | |||
The ways of writing things change, the underlying principles and ideas do not | |||
QtPlatypus | petykoo: No perl5 regexes are more or less a subset of perl6 rules | 14:53 | |
petykoo | yea? | ||
Juerd | Yep | ||
Notation changes | |||
What you can do, and how you do that, does not | |||
Except, of course, that in Perl 6 you can do a lot more | |||
stevan_ | autrijus: ping | 14:54 | |
petykoo | hmm... | ||
14:54
stevan_ is now known as stevan
|
|||
Juerd | petykoo: It will only get more readable. | 14:54 | |
petykoo | maybe i'll should try out anyway.. | ||
Juerd | petykoo: /(?=foo)/ changes to /<before foo>/ | ||
petykoo: learn.perl.org/library/beginning_perl/ is a good book for beginners. | 14:55 | ||
petykoo | thanks, i gotta go, but i'll be back in minutes | ||
moskvax | Juerd: thanks for the information | 14:56 | |
svnbot6 | r7703 | stevan++ | Perl6::MetaModel - | ||
r7703 | stevan++ | * keeping Chaos-unoptimized up to date | |||
r7703 | stevan++ | * very very very rough sketch of the Object Space, this needs | |||
r7703 | stevan++ | much more work and thought | |||
autrijus | stevan: pong | 14:57 | |
freshly off lightning talk #1 | |||
#2 about to be on | |||
stevan | autrijus: nice | ||
autrijus: so i assume you dont have a moment | |||
autrijus | you can type away | ||
but I'll be able to properly respond only when I'm back to hotel | 14:58 | ||
which is ~1hr from now | |||
sorry about those conferences :/ | |||
stevan | I am composing a p6c email, I think that will be a better forum :) | ||
autrijus | (but I try to remedy by signing on new committers) | ||
good, we should use p6c more :) | |||
stevan | autrijus: don't apologize,.. you are our spokesman | ||
Juerd | autrijus++ # propagates ideas and wisdom IRL | ||
petykoo | i'm back | ||
stevan | hey nothingmuch | ||
autrijus | turns out I'm speaking again in copenhagen this thursday | 14:59 | |
autrijus is feeling like Damian | |||
nothingmuch | hi ho | ||
petykoo | Juerd: so, you say perl6 will be more speaky?:) | ||
nothingmuch | like damian? | ||
Juerd | petykoo: Perl 6 rules will certainly be | ||
petykoo | OK | ||
stevan | autrijus: if only you could get paid (well) for all these speaking engagements | ||
Juerd | petykoo: Perl 6 for the rest of the language will be in some points, and be more concise in others | ||
autrijus | stevan: nah, it's all outofpocket | 15:00 | |
stevan: I'm getting good at travelling cheap :) | |||
stevan thinks maybe we should divert pugs resources to write a TPF grant | |||
nothingmuch | so what's been up this week? | ||
stevan | or even better | ||
nothingmuch has had a big deadline and has been giving his spare time to catalyst lately | |||
autrijus | nothingmuch: I talked with kane about policy files and multiversioning | 15:01 | |
nothingmuch | policy files? | ||
autrijus | synced with obra about bringing it back and proto in p5 | ||
stevan | if we can figure out how perl6 can fight terrorism, then we can get a DARPA US gov grant | ||
autrijus | and talked with sky about -BPerl5Optimized | ||
Juerd | stevan: Give terrorists committer bits; that'll keep 'em off the streets! :) | ||
autrijus | nothingmuch: policy files are what you use to decide which DBI to use out of the 16,384 DBIs instealled | ||
nothingmuch | ah | ||
autrijus | mm, "instealled". nice typo | 15:02 | |
nothingmuch | -BPerl5Optimized sounds interesting | ||
autrijus | nothingmuch: yeah, involve handcrafted OPs | ||
nothingmuch | perl 5 ops for PIL? | ||
autrijus | yes | ||
goal being keeping p5 a "Production" VM for p6 | |||
nothingmuch | woot! | ||
Juerd | I still thinks that different modules with the same name will not work too great, if only for discussion | ||
autrijus | instead of just a "good to have backcompat" | ||
Juerd | Imagine #perlhelp. "Okay, nice, but before we can help you. Please answer these questions: What DBI is that? Which CGI module do you use? Is that LWP's HTTP::Headers, and if so: which LWP?" | 15:03 | |
autrijus | "the CPAN one, of course!" | 15:04 | |
stevan goes to compose some p6c ramblings | |||
& | 15:05 | ||
autrijus | Juerd: I think most people will use the default policy file shipped with perl. | ||
which would prefer cpan: | |||
I hope, at least. | |||
Juerd | I think and hope all will | ||
Which defeats the entire purpose | |||
autrijus | nope | ||
good by default, customizable if needed | 15:06 | ||
Juerd | It's never needed | ||
Because you can load any module with any alias | |||
autrijus | I think that's where people differ :) | ||
Juerd | use MyDBI as DBI | ||
Whichever the spelling of 'as' will be. | |||
autrijus | use perl5:DBI as DBI; | ||
yeah, true | |||
Juerd: I think having the ability to install DBI 1.46 and DBI 1.99 makes sense. | 15:08 | ||
Juerd | So do I | ||
petykoo | thanks, bye | ||
Juerd | But those are the versions of the same module | ||
Rather than different modules having the same name | |||
Anyway | |||
afk # bathroom's free. MY TURN! WOOOO. | 15:09 | ||
xerox feels Juerd | |||
autrijus | Juerd: I think DBI-1.34-cpan:AUTRIJUS and DBI-1.56-cpan:JUERD can be safely thought of versions of the same module too. | 15:12 | |
in my mind it's simply that the versionspec is now namespaced. | |||
but they still need to mean, "conceptually", "the same thing" | |||
hey Liz! | 15:29 | ||
Liz | hi Autrijus | ||
autrijus | I'm about to go on NPW lightning talk in 1 min :) | 15:30 | |
Liz | thought I'd come and have a look... ;-) | ||
autrijus | (will be back in a bit) | ||
sure! | |||
Liz | ok | ||
have fun! | |||
autrijus | ?eval 'Liz++' xx 10 | ||
evalbot_7703 | ("Liz++", "Liz++", "Liz++", "Liz++", "Liz++", "Liz++", "Liz++", "Liz++", "Liz++", "Liz++") | ||
xerox | haha | ||
?eval "foo" x 2 | |||
evalbot_7703 | "foofoo" | ||
xerox | ooooh. | ||
glasser | ?eval "foo" xxx 3 | 15:46 | |
evalbot_7703 | Error: unexpected "x" expecting operator, postfix conditional, postfix loop, postfix iteration, ";" or end of input | ||
xerox | hah | 15:49 | |
powersets? :P | |||
glasser | that, or porn. | 15:52 | |
Juerd | Hi Liz | 16:25 | |
Liz | hi Juerd... | ||
Juerd | Good to see you here :) | ||
Liz | yep... good to be here... | ||
don't expect too much from me though... ;-) | 16:26 | ||
Juerd | I have no expectations | ||
I think people mostly see what they do here as fun, not as work. | |||
Or at least fun work | |||
Liz | well, then you expect fun, don't you? | ||
;-) | 16:27 | ||
Juerd | Hm | ||
Well, I expect conditionally :) | |||
IF you do stuff, it better be fun to you. | |||
Liz | true... | ||
integral | ?eval my $n = 0; sub hello_thread { async { say "hello #" ~ $n++ } } for 1..4 { hello_thread }; | ||
evalbot_7703 | hello #0 hello #1 hello #2 undef | ||
Liz | hmmm... | 16:28 | |
Juerd | There's a thread missing :) | ||
integral | I think it just doesn't get a chance to run | ||
and no sleep in evalbot | 16:29 | ||
Juerd | integral: Try a sleep then | ||
Oh. | |||
Then a commodore 64 like sleep: "" for 1..15000 :) | |||
Though 15000 may be a bit too much for pugs; I don't know | |||
integral | heh, we need an optimizer to spoil that trick | ||
Juerd | And since there is no optimizer :) | 16:30 | |
integral | although I don't think that particular optimisation is that hard a one | ||
Juerd | I think it's a pointless thing to waste optimizer time on | 16:32 | |
It's not something you write on purpose without the purpose. | |||
integral | Juerd: hmm, well it's just constant in void context -> noop (perl5 does this), and then eliminating a loop with a empty loop body | 16:33 | |
stevan | autrijus: p6c Object Space post is off,.. please respond with your comments :) | 16:34 | |
Juerd | integral: The loop with the empty body elimination is what I think is pointless :) | 16:35 | |
Aankhen`` goes to sleep. | |||
G'night. | |||
Juerd | integral: OTOH, for (1..much) { if (known to be false) { ... } } to be optimized away would be nice | ||
integral | hmm, yeah, I can't think of a case where you'd get an empty loop body after some other optimisation | ||
Juerd | integral: Forget I said anything | ||
integral | ah, that's a good one! | ||
Juerd | But! | 16:36 | |
We should discuss whether infinite and could-be-infinite loops should be optimized away. | |||
Or perhaps an infinite empty loop should just die | |||
integral | ah, yes, that's a nasty one. I suppose the middle ground is ... yeah that | ||
Juerd | We have sleep for that. | 16:37 | |
integral | but when should it die? as early as possible or as late as possible? | ||
Juerd | At optimization time. | ||
i.e. as early as possible | |||
Certain death must always be asap | |||
There's no point in executing the program if you know there will be a fatal exception later on. | 16:38 | ||
integral | should that rule be applied to typechecking too? like if you've got: my $a = 5; $a.bark(); # should this die as early-as-possible? | ||
Juerd | And doing so would unnecessarily execute potential impurity | ||
integral | Juerd: there's the if (0) { while (1) { } } case, should that die when detected? | ||
and that one might even depend on the order of the two optimisations | 16:39 | ||
Juerd | Yes, but "as early as possible", in the case of types, is still runtime. | ||
(Unless you specify the pragma that promises you're not going to change types) | |||
integral | Juerd: ah, well I'd perfer it to be speced using words liek "as early as possible" so that when typechecking appears, people aren't surprised | ||
hrm | |||
Juerd | integral: No. If there's an explicit if (0) { ... }, always count that as meant to be a temporary multiline comment | 16:40 | |
integral | Juerd: and if (SOME_CONSTANT) { ... }? | ||
Juerd | integral: Dubious, but throw away the body for different reasons: looking through all of it, just to find warnings is a waste of time. | 16:41 | |
integral | hmm, maybe there would be a "lint" flag to the compiler, which would do more extensive tests like this | ||
Juerd | The optimizer pass must be very quick, or optimization makes the program slower than without. | 16:42 | |
integral | eg. if SOME_CONSTANT is predicated on platform, you can catch it all on your dev machine, without testing it on all platforms | ||
Juerd | That is a nice idea | ||
It could just be a standard test though | |||
integral | maybe this is perl6's equivalent of use strict, or use warnings/-w | 16:43 | |
Juerd | No, those two shouldn't have great effect on processing time. | ||
All of Perl is modular. A test can access the parser and the optimizer. Add a flag to the optimizer call, and have this be a t/stupidity.t | 16:44 | ||
integral | hmm, maybe the spec shouldn't say "as early as possible", but instead "the compiler is allowed to die earlier than runtime, if it feels like it" | ||
Juerd | No | ||
"as early as possible" is precise | 16:45 | ||
"it feels like it" is very imprecise | |||
integral | yes, intentionally | ||
then you can vary whether infinite loops die at optimiser time, if you're doing batch compilation, or run-time if you're compiling just before running | |||
Juerd | This makes every bug a "it felt like it" case | ||
I don't like vague specs | 16:46 | ||
Or, as I prefer to call them: anti | |||
integral | what would be a bug? | ||
Juerd | Or, as I prefer to call them: anti-specs | ||
integral | the spec still says that it must die, rather than do something undefined | ||
Juerd | Then when it dies must also be clear | ||
integral | or should the spec say "this should die at compile time in batch mode, and run time in interpretive mode"? | ||
Juerd | The point of determination ("when possible") is not always predictable. But at least it's defined. | 16:47 | |
integral | is it? | ||
Juerd | Never talk to me about batch versus interactive. | ||
It's a programming language, not a shell. I find this a very weak thing in Python. | |||
integral | I didn't say interactive. | 16:48 | |
Juerd | stdin must not be treated differently depending on such things | ||
integral | I said "interpretive", maybe I should have said JIT? | ||
Juerd | In that case: what is your definition of "batch mode"? | ||
integral | I have no idea. that's a big hole in my suggestion | ||
But what's your definition of "where possible"? | |||
Juerd | *when* possible | 16:49 | |
integral | so that means I don't have to die if I don't feel it's possible? | ||
Juerd | That's the point at which all factors in making the decision are constant. | ||
But if any of the conditions could still change, it's not possible to die yet. | |||
integral | hmm | 16:50 | |
Juerd | As soon as the last condition turns to certainty, die immediately. This may be during optimization time, or during runtime. It could even be parse time or compile time. | ||
integral | hmm, yeah. | 16:51 | |
Juerd | But when you know for sure that it's going to die, don't waste any bit or nanosecond | ||
This excludes explicit dies, of course :) | |||
You wouldn't want "print 'foo'; die;" to die during compile time | |||
"Death imminent, not waiting around at - line 1" :) | 16:52 | ||
integral | hmm, I guess that's another lint only one | ||
Juerd | ? | ||
integral | like dieing on finding infinite loops inside unreachable if branches | 16:53 | |
Juerd | unconditional death isn't a mistake | ||
afk # food | |||
integral | & food for me too | 16:56 | |
ingy | seen autrijus | 17:00 | |
jabbot | ingy: autrijus was seen 1 hours 30 minutes 24 seconds ago | ||
stevan | ingy: he was giving a lightning talk a little while ago | 17:01 | |
he said he would be back online when he got to the hotel | |||
ingy | stevan: thanks | ||
stevan | ingy: your welcome :) | 17:02 | |
Alias_ | autrijus: ping? | 17:14 | |
Anyone familiar with the pugs subversion repository? | 17:15 | ||
stevan | Alias_: what do you need to know? | 17:19 | |
Alias_ | Do you use the whole trunk/branches/tags/etc model? | ||
stevan | nope | ||
Alias_ | Under that situation, what is the protocol for doing branches? | ||
stevan | I am not sure why though, but it was like that when i got here | ||
Alias_ | Or haven't they been needed | 17:20 | |
stevan | use svk :) | ||
Alias_ | So all branches are one person private branches? | ||
stevan | svk makes local branches easy, then if it works, you merge it into the trunk | ||
all done locally | |||
yeah | |||
Alias_ | hmm | ||
stevan | it works for Pugs,.. I am not sure it is a universally good technique though | ||
Alias_ | I am probably going to need multi-person branches | 17:21 | |
You don't use tags either do you? | |||
tag-via-copy seems to suck extremely hard | |||
stevan | I believe (and people can correct me if I am wrong) but you can serve your svk branch from your machine if need be | ||
Alias_ | You should be able to, they are just svn repos | ||
with some extra metadata | 17:22 | ||
stevan | yup | ||
ingy | hi Alias_ | ||
Alias_ | hiya | ||
stevan | never tried it myself, but like i said, it *should* work | ||
Alias_ | ingy: So, has the Kwiki::Publish itch been scratched yet? :) | 17:24 | |
ingy | Alias_: I realized later that basically you were saying about YAML, "The way that I interpret what YAML claims to do is not possible", which is likely true ;) | 17:25 | |
Alias_: not yet, RSN! | |||
it's a good itch | |||
Alias_ | ingy: Well, my complaints about YAML are two things | ||
ingy | and I am planning on coming into a windfall of tuits in a few weeks | 17:26 | |
Alias_ | One is that generalised cross-platform object serialize/deserialize isn't possible | ||
And two that you claim you can | |||
:) | |||
ingy | this is true. but yaml doesn't claim generalised cross-platform object serialization | 17:27 | |
you are reading way to far into a simple summary | |||
Alias_ | Except that it seperately claims 1) To be cross platform, and 2) To serialize/deserialize objects | ||
ingy | s/to/too/ | ||
again... | |||
Alias_ | Well, it claims to be cross-platform, that much is clear | ||
ingy | you are reading way too far into a simple summary | ||
even that is not clear | |||
it attempts to be reasonably good for reasonable language | 17:28 | ||
Alias_ | "YAML interacts well with scripting languages" | ||
plural... | |||
ingy | and if two people on two platforms can agree on a schema, then YAML can be a good choice | 17:29 | |
Alias_ | Sure, but in the mean time you allow non-schema objects very badly | ||
ingy | it is always the case that there needs to be a contract of communication between to communicating entities | ||
Alias_ | blessing into non-existant classes for one | 17:30 | |
ingy | ok, so you are talking about yaml.pm and not yaml at this point | ||
Alias_ | I treat YAML as a non-broken implementation of YAML, yes | 17:31 | |
Perhaps the reference implementation even | |||
17:31
ods15_ is now known as ods15
|
|||
Alias_ | err YAML.pm | 17:31 | |
If every implementation of a parser for a language is broken, is the language broken by design? | 17:32 | ||
ingy | good question | ||
I have no answer for that | |||
but I am working currently on new YAML tools for Perl | |||
Alias_ | Then can I make some suggestions? | 17:33 | |
ingy | including a YAML::Simple module | ||
sure | |||
but not here | |||
Alias_ | #channel? | ||
ingy | #yaml is fine by me | ||
17:37
khisanth_ is now known as Khisanth
|
|||
integral | Alias_: I hope you don't mind me asking, but what do you need a multi-person branch of pugs for? | 18:08 | |
Alias_ | not pugs, openopenoffice | ||
integral | ah | ||
Alias_ | But I hate the whole branches/tags thing, and I was curious how pugs deals with it | ||
since I'm trying to do this as much like an -Ofun project as I can | 18:09 | ||
wow, the US border fence doesn't go very far offshore... how many people a year try to swim around? | 18:11 | ||
wrong channel | |||
integral | hmm, I suppose cases where we could have used a branch was for things like changing run cores around (eg. introducting PIL), but pugs instead just has all the run cores in parallel. | ||
Alias_ | yeah, in my case I need to deal with client and server halves being built by totally different teams | ||
Perl for the server, C#/.NET/Office for the client | 18:12 | ||
integral | ah, so you want the server team to have a known working client to test with while the client team break stuff | ||
Alias_ | So if we do an overhaul of the SOAP interface, both sides need to play | ||
integral | well, another thing that's done in pugs, is if you change an interface since everything is together, you can also just change everything that uses it too | ||
Alias_ | yeah | 18:13 | |
But since I have two very different skillsets, that's not really an option | |||
Some of these guys literally won't be able to set up the environment to edit in | |||
To hack the client you probably need WinXP, Visual Studio and Office installed | |||
And the server people are mostly linux | 18:14 | ||
integral | hmm, sounds like you really need two duplicate trees, and then have someone who does smerges between them | ||
Alias_ | All I really need is a well defined SOAP interface | ||
But if that should change, I want it to change on a branch | |||
So that all parties have time to adapt before merging | |||
integral | hmm, breaking everything has the advantage that things have to adapt | 18:15 | |
Alias_ | Which is not the effect I want if a million clueless Office users are running the plugin | 18:29 | |
integral | that's what releases are for... | ||
Alias_ | My project is likely to be significantly lacking in PhDs | ||
Also, one it is widespread, I'll probably need to do release branches | |||
So we can have small security/compatibility fixes/patches while having major new versions | 18:30 | ||
integral | sounds way more organised than pugs | 18:32 | |
Alias_ | It needs to be, unfortunately | ||
sky_ | does haskell have a graph storage engine? | 21:11 | |
xerox | If you want there is a delimited-continuations-powered zipper-navigated referentially-transparent monadic filesystem :-) | 21:12 | |
Alias_ | define graph | ||
math or chart | |||
SamB | sky_: not built in, but I'm sure you can make one ;-) | ||
sky_ | Alias_: if I meant chart I would say chart :)( | ||
ingy | hi sky_ | 21:17 | |
Juerd | What are your greatest Perl 6 fears? | 21:18 | |
ingy | Is this a poll? | ||
xerox | Being not able to fully understand it at a certain point. | 21:19 | |
integral | that people will try to do logic programming with junctions, and store junctions in lots of variables, and pass them to other people's modules and classes. | ||
ingy | that it is the final version of Perl | ||
ingy looks forward to Perl 7 | 21:20 | ||
sky_ | ingy: two things | ||
ingy: foor boojum www.unfare.org/unfare/2005/10/hello...y_air.html | 21:21 | ||
ingy: I AM MOVING TO THE CITY STATE OF SAN FRANCISCO | |||
Juerd | ingy: Sort of. | ||
integral: Can this be shortened to: that junctions will be abused? | 21:22 | ||
feDe__ | anybody, a little help for a tiny script...? | ||
integral | Juerd: yes. I think junctions are only good for easily saying things like: if (1|2|3 == $x) { ... }. | ||
feDe__ | $pid = `egrep "^GEN_KEY_ID" $CONFDIR/sk_install.conf | sed -r 's/^.*=([-]?[0-9]*)/\1/'`; kill($pid); | ||
ingy | sky_: fantastic and fantastic | 21:23 | |
feDe__ | $pid should've the process id that i want to kill.. | ||
sky_ | ingy: I am going on the hello kitty flight | ||
integral | feDe__: err, that seems to be mostly egrep and sed, not perl. Why not just write it as a shell script and use the kill program? | ||
feDe__ | but, it doesn't... (the shell part works perfectly! :S) | ||
ingy | sky_: when? | 21:24 | |
feDe__ | because i need it to be a perl script :S:S | ||
sky_ | ingy: over christmas | ||
business class is like 450 USD | |||
feDe__ | egrep "^GEN_KEY_ID" $CONFDIR/sk_install.conf | sed -r 's/^.*=([-]?[0-9]*)/\1/' ---------> here, in my beauty bash, it echoes the pid that i'm looking 4.. | 21:25 | |
Juerd | sky_: Do you have any Perl 6 fears? | ||
sky_ | no | ||
why would I | |||
ingy | sky_: check msg | 21:26 | |
grr | |||
Blicero | does pugs do threading yet? | 21:27 | |
Juerd | sky_: Many people do | ||
ingy | sky_: are you on irc.perl.org? | ||
integral | Blicero: yep | 21:28 | |
Juerd | typing 'svk add fears' feels funny. | ||
svnbot6 | r7704 | juerd++ | Assorted fears | ||
integral | ?eval async { print "hello "; print "blicero" } say "goodbye" | ||
evalbot_7703 | Error: unexpected "s" expecting term postfix, operator, postfix conditional, postfix loop, postfix iteration, ";" or end of input | ||
sky_ | ingy: yes | ||
ingy | I need to msg you but this fricking freenode needs me to do something | ||
integral | ?eval async { print "hello "; print "blicero" }; say "goodbye" | ||
evalbot_7703 | hello blicerogoodbye bool::true | ||
Blicero | why's it called async | 21:29 | |
integral | because it does things asynchronously? | ||
although, note that until GHC 6.5's smp support arrives, these are only simulated threads | 21:30 | ||
SamB | they are green threads, useful for doing asynchronous processing and I/O (as long as you don't use FFI, anyway...) | 21:31 | |
svnbot6 | r7705 | juerd++ | One more | 21:34 | |
r7706 | juerd++ | A few more | 21:40 | ||
Juerd | evalbot_7706: You be stupid. | 21:44 | |
Liz | Juerd: don't insult the bots ;-) | ||
Juerd | evalbot_7706: Sorry 'bout that. Your killing is stupid. | 21:45 | |
It doesn't kill itself, it seems. | |||
Does Pugs have *any* IPC yet? | 21:46 | ||
Of course it does. It has sockets. What am I mumbling. | |||
dolmen | seen autrijus | 22:16 | |
jabbot | dolmen: autrijus was seen 6 hours 45 minutes 57 seconds ago | ||
Liz | he said he'd be back after the lightning talk at NPW | 22:17 | |
guess he got sidetracked by some scandinavians... ;-) | |||
dolmen | thx Liz | 22:18 | |
Jooon | I didn't see him after the lighthning talks. he said he was going for a short nap and then join the rest of us later (the sidetracky beer drinking scandinavians) | 22:19 | |
Liz | I guess the nap got extended... | ||
he looked pretty exhausted already at the Amsterdam PM Social Meeting... | 22:20 | ||
Jooon | I still wonder where he gets his energy :) All his talks were very fun, especially the visual basic rocketh lightning talk which was like a normal talk, just much much faster :) | 22:21 | |
Liz | yes, that was fun... and scary... ;-) | 22:22 | |
dolmen | It's past midnight in Stockholm... The nap may last for a few hours :) | ||
Liz | same here... | ||
dolmen | and her :) | ||
s/her/here/ | |||
svnbot6 | r7707 | Ovid++ | Slight update to recipe. Testing commit access | 23:41 |