Please test pre0: pugs.blogs.com/pre0/Perl6-Pugs-6.2.12.tar.gz | paste: sial.org/pbot/perl6 | pugs.blogs.com | pugscode.org | pugs.kwiki.org Set by audreyt on 12 June 2006. |
|||
00:23
jsiracusa joined
00:27
b00t joined
00:46
FurnaceBoy_ is now known as FB|afk
00:50
dduncan joined
00:51
hikozaemon joined,
oylenshpeegul joined
00:53
rashakil__ left
01:12
weinig|work is now known as weinig
01:15
oylenshpeegul left
01:42
amnesiac joined
01:44
Shabble joined
01:48
amnesiac joined
01:59
sproingie joined
02:06
sproingie joined
02:19
lambdabot joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r10676 | audreyt++ | * assign.t: The Synopsis now no longer guarantee list context for: | 02:25 | |
r10676 | audreyt++ | ($a) = W, W, W; | |||
r10676 | audreyt++ | so we fix it as: | |||
r10676 | audreyt++ | ($a,) = W, W, W; | |||
r10676 | audreyt++ | and indeed that works with Pugs. | |||
02:27
jsiracusa joined
02:42
lambdabot joined
02:53
weinig is now known as weinig|sleep
03:26
cmarcelo joined
|
|||
cmarcelo | audreyt: ping? | 03:26 | |
03:47
rzoz joined
04:10
cmarcelo left
|
|||
QtPlatypus | What does it take to wrangle an account on feather? | 04:17 | |
04:29
justatheory joined
|
|||
audreyt | QtPlatypus: write Juerd at perl6 dot nl | 04:40 | |
with your desired nick, ssh pubkey, and realname | 04:41 | ||
audreyt is still packing... bbiab | |||
05:03
unobe joined
05:05
cmarcelo joined
|
|||
unobe | make test results on darwin/ppc (embedded parrot): | 05:15 | |
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed | |||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
t/oo/proxy.t 18 6 33.33% 4 6 9 13 15 18 | |||
t/pugsrun/06-dash-help.t 254 65024 8 12 150.00% 3-8 | |||
t/pugsrun/06-dash-version.t 254 65024 8 10 125.00% 4-8 | |||
t/pugsrun/07-dash-uppercase-v.t 0 10 59 72 122.03% 24-59 | |||
t/pugsrun/09-dash-uppercase-c.t 0 10 84 140 166.67% 15-84 | |||
t/pugsrun/11-safemode.t 254 65024 6 8 133.33% 3-6 | |||
t/pugsrun/12-script-args.t 0 11 10 8 80.00% 7-10 | |||
t/rules/from_perl6_rules/inline.t 2 1 50.00% 1 | |||
t/rules/from_perl6_rules/named_ca 26 3 11.54% 21-23 | |||
t/rules/from_perl6_rules/stdrules 207 4 1.93% 12-13 15-16 | |||
942 subtests skipped. | |||
eww...that didn't come out nice...i'll nopaste | 05:16 | ||
pasteling | "unobe" at 66.91.225.25 pasted "make test results on darwin/ppc (embedded parrot)" (14 lines, 1K) at sial.org/pbot/17705 | 05:17 | |
lambdabot | The title of that page is "Paste #17705 from "unobe" at 66.91.225.25" | ||
unobe | dduncan: from my run, it looks like a good chunk of t/pugsrun/07-dash-uppercase-v.t is failing | 05:19 | |
can anybody give advice on why I should/shouldn't build with parrot embedded? | 05:20 | ||
audreyt | hi | 05:21 | |
looks indeed like embparrot fails | 05:22 | ||
embparrot gives you the ability to evaluate raw PIR code | |||
unobe | ok | ||
audreyt | but otherwise nothing much is gained | ||
cmarcelo | audreyt: busy? | ||
unobe | oh, okay | 05:23 | |
audreyt | it's there mostly as a prof of concept | ||
cmarcelo: moderately busy. just finished packing; going to airport in ~2hr | |||
unobe | so if i build pugs without embedded parrot, does pugs need more than libparrot.dylib (I think that is all it needed with parrot embedded) | 05:24 | |
? | |||
audreyt | cmarcelo: what's up? | ||
unobe: if you build it without embparrot then we need bin/parrot in path | 05:25 | ||
to run rules | |||
but that's not mandatory | |||
unobe | ah, okay | ||
cmarcelo | audreyt: (i'll ask, but is ok to "postpone") i "patched" Pugs.Prim and Pugs.Prim.Yaml to use BitSet instead of IntSet.... how's a good way to measure the differences (besides make smoke).. as I understand the difference isn't going to be much, but anyway... | ||
audreyt: I didnt know how Implicit params stuff worked, so did a hack that maybe wrong, but compiles AND the compiled pugs work... =o) | 05:26 | ||
unobe | so if bin/parrot is in the path, then PGE will be used? | ||
audreyt | unobe: yes | 05:28 | |
cmarcelo: uh, I don't know, try this | |||
my @a = (@a => @a => @a => @a); @a.perl for 1..1000 | 05:29 | ||
or something a bit more complex | |||
and see if wallclock hanges | |||
changes | 05:30 | ||
cmarcelo | what does this "perl" operator do? | ||
audreyt | it does what Data::Dumper::Dumper did. | 05:32 | |
unobe | if I get an error like "*** Cannot parse PGE: a\n*** Error: does not exist\n" when evaluating: "a" ~~ /a/ | 05:33 | |
does that mean I don't have parrot installed properly? | |||
audreyt | yeah ,it means it cannot find parrot in path | 05:34 | |
you can also set env PARROT_PATH | |||
unobe | thanks audreyt. I don't have the parrot source built on the computer (just copied the parrot binaries over), | 05:39 | |
so i'll download the source and build again, keeping PARROT_PATH pointed to the new directory | 05:40 | ||
where i'll rebuild parrot | |||
audreyt | k | 05:41 | |
unobe | i just thought that pugs needed the binaries for parrot, and that was it, but it looks like i don't have the component of parrot that pugs needs to make that happen | 05:42 | |
cmarcelo | audreyt: not very significative change (pugs-local wins by 0.2s).. some inconsistencies (N=30000 pugs wins by 0.130s, N=40000 local-pugs wins by 0.330s).. i feel that all this differences are inside the error margin.. =P | 05:54 | |
audreyt | oh well :) | 05:55 | |
JL and JHS are by far more interesting (And widely used) anyway | |||
still, nopaste your patch? | 05:56 | ||
it'd be interesting to redefine IHash to JudyHS | |||
cmarcelo | i'm "adding complexity" to see if things change.. =o) | ||
audreyt | and rewrite its chunk in src/Pugs/Types/Hash.hs | ||
cmarcelo | well. differences become more "dramatic" when @a definition is more complex... | 05:58 | |
audreyt | oh good good | 06:00 | |
thinking about it in the simple case it's always a hit | |||
never a miss | |||
so it's like best case | |||
pasteling | "cmarcelo" at 200.232.236.25 pasted "Judy BitSet on Pugs Prim, take 1" (105 lines, 3.7K) at sial.org/pbot/17706 | 06:01 | |
lambdabot | The title of that page is "Paste #17706 from "cmarcelo" at 200.232.236.25" | ||
audreyt | so it's dramatic in the good or bad sense? | ||
cmarcelo | good =) | ||
pugs-local wins by a better margin.. | |||
best case => makes sense.. | 06:02 | ||
audreyt | ooh. how much? | ||
cmarcelo | audreyt: that seen <- .... and then let ?seen = seen is right? | ||
audreyt | sure, correct | 06:03 | |
cmarcelo | correct but ugly =(.. implicit params can only be "binded" with lets? | 06:04 | |
audreyt | yes, though in this case pasing it around explicitly maymakemoresense | 06:05 | |
but will compile to the same code | |||
so don't bother... | |||
cmarcelo | ok. numbers: your @a, N=10000, pugs-local wins by 0.04s ... my @a, N=10000, pugs-local wins by 0.3s | 06:07 | |
my @a = (@a => @a => @a => @a => @a => @a => @a => "eu" => "222" => @a => "i" => "ego" => 32178321 => @a => "eu" => @a) | |||
(i really dont know what this mean at all hehe) | 06:08 | ||
audreyt | how many s in total? | ||
cmarcelo | 23.5 | ||
audreyt | oh. try something with all misses? | ||
cmarcelo | well, still on error margin... | 06:09 | |
ok | |||
audreyt | my @a = (@a => 1..1000) | ||
er, nvm | |||
my (@a, @b, @c, @d, @e, @f, @g, @h); | 06:10 | ||
@a = (@a => @b => @c => @d => @e => @f => @g => @h) | |||
lambdabot | Maybe you meant: all-dicts arr ask . v | ||
cmarcelo | okok | ||
QtPlatypus | Would @a = [=>] (@a,@b,@c,@d,@e,@f,@g,@h); Be equiverlent or would I have to use ; | 06:14 | |
audreyt | I think you want ;, because otherwise it flattens | 06:15 | |
cmarcelo | N=10000, difference is less than 0.1 (pugs-local wins).. =| | ||
audreyt | oh well. ;) | ||
it's not a critical loop anyway | |||
as long as the output is the same.. | |||
maybe it's better to write your own bench | 06:16 | ||
but I'd worry about CollectionM first | |||
cmarcelo | Types/Hash.hs is more time critical? | 06:17 | |
Collection stuff => is my next step. i wasn't even suppose to be hacking on HsJudy these days =o) | |||
audreyt | :D | 06:20 | |
yes, Types/Hash.hs (IHash) and Types/Array.hs (IArray) | |||
are the original motivation for the Job Ad | |||
I mean, SoC project idea | |||
06:22
iblechbot joined
|
|||
cmarcelo | well, i think (hope? hehe) JudyHS can compete in IHash area at least. | 06:25 | |
gotta go sleep | 06:26 | ||
have a good trip | 06:27 | ||
& | |||
06:27
cmarcelo left
|
|||
audreyt | g'nite :) | 06:28 | |
06:36
dduncan joined
|
|||
dduncan | unobe, it was only the very end of t/pugsrun/07-dash-uppercase-v.t that I initially had a problem with when smoking, but I couldn't recreate that error when I ran the test in isolation | 06:38 | |
also, as always, I have been using the pure-Haskell Pugs ... no alternate backends of any kind | 06:39 | ||
audreyt | I can't dup that but I can dup leo's proxy.t err | 06:40 | |
investigating | |||
06:51
mugwump joined
06:57
marmic joined
06:59
viirya joined
|
|||
audreyt wonders what's wrong with harness | 07:13 | ||
in any case, I gotta run to airport now... be back in 1.5hr | 07:14 | ||
& | 07:17 | ||
07:19
unobe joined
07:54
kane__ joined
07:56
SM_ax joined
08:20
buetow joined
08:26
lisppaste3 joined
|
|||
audreyt | rehi from cks airport | 09:00 | |
webmind | cks ? | 09:03 | |
where would that be? :) | |||
audreyt | .tw | 09:05 | |
webmind | ah ok | ||
and wb btw :) | |||
dduncan | so the trip was uneventful | ||
09:05
elmex joined
|
|||
audreyt | nice that the flight comes with complimentary 30min facial skin treatment session and moisturizer bottles | 09:06 | |
dduncan | were you in 1st class? I've never heard of such a thing | ||
on flights I take, they give you food and magazines, maybe pillows | |||
but I don't go first class | 09:07 | ||
audreyt | no, it's couch | ||
economy class | |||
dduncan | or is it just a difference between asian and na airlines | ||
audreyt | I'm taking KLM (.nl) airlines... | 09:08 | |
webmind | audreyt, that is nice.. | ||
audreyt | maybe it's a difference between asian and na airports | ||
webmind | dduncan, crappy food even on my flights | ||
dduncan | I haven't found anything to complain about with food that I've got while flying ... in "regular class" | 09:09 | |
s/regular/$regular/ | |||
sure, its not like from a quality restaurant, but its not terrible | |||
webmind | well I guess it's doable.. it just never had much taste... can't say btw that I had much flights with food | 09:10 | |
audreyt | weirdly I can't duplicate the "(stub)" error when I change "make test" targets to it alone | ||
webmind | just 4or6 | ||
dduncan | I surmise its possible that was a transient error, maybe a side effect of multi-process communication gone bad | 09:11 | |
I'll see if it goes away when testing another preflight and/or the final version | |||
or I can re-smoke the same pre0 if that is helpful ... but as it would late, that would happen tomorrow | |||
audreyt | mmmhmm | 09:12 | |
svnbot6 | r10677 | audreyt++ | * inc::Module::Install::Pugs - sort the tests before "make test"'ing | 09:13 | |
r10677 | audreyt++ | in the vain hope that the proxy.t failure is order dependent. | |||
audreyt | dduncan: you see the error on "make smoke" with conc=4? | 09:15 | |
I see it with "make test" and no conc | |||
09:20
pjmm joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r10678 | audreyt++ | * explicitly use the same order and test sequence in "make smoke" | 09:22 | |
09:26
phpError joined
|
|||
dduncan | those were my settings, yes | 09:28 | |
I will do the same procecure as earlier, on the same tarball, tomorrow, to test in case the situation was transient or not | 09:29 | ||
but I had conc = 4, on a 2 cpu system, and so each Pugs took around 46% of a cpu | 09:30 | ||
audreyt | nod, but somehow I think there are other explanations | ||
did you upload the smoke report? | |||
dduncan | quite possible | ||
yes | |||
audreyt | which one was that? | ||
dduncan | I made a note to this channel in real-time as I did each stage | 09:31 | |
m19s28.vlinux.de/iblech/stuff/pugs-...0a1d0.html | |||
mine is the first line item under release/darwin | |||
audreyt | 'k. let me attempt a fix | 09:32 | |
dduncan | now, in my prior experience, 'stub' is what you get if you declare N tests, then do N-1 | ||
N being 69 in this case | 09:33 | ||
audreyt | yes, so reasonably it died after the penultimate test | ||
dduncan | but when I did a direct ./pugs t/pugsrun/07-dash-uppercase-v.t, with a copy of Test.pm in the Pugs root dir, it ran all 69 | 09:34 | |
I didn't look close enough, but either the test died, or the IPC cut off before #69 was transferred | |||
IPC to the harness | 09:35 | ||
given the nature of this issue, it may be specific to me and/or transient ... don't feel the need to hold up the release to attend to this | 09:37 | ||
it is still pre-alpha anyway | |||
good night | 09:38 | ||
09:38
dduncan left
|
|||
audreyt | ok, I have a conjecture | 09:39 | |
"slurp" was being too lazy and destroyed by the "unlink" next lie | |||
fixing | 09:40 | ||
09:51
macroron joined
|
|||
audreyt | identified as a race condition | 09:52 | |
made slurp() as strict as possible | |||
committed. entering boarding area, bbiab... | 09:54 | ||
svnbot6 | r10679 | audreyt++ | * 07-dash-uppercase-v.t: Be a bit more precise by using index() | ||
r10679 | audreyt++ | instead of a PCRE regex to test output message. | |||
r10680 | audreyt++ | * Pugs.Prim: Made "slurp" as strict as possible, to counter | |||
r10680 | audreyt++ | this race condition triggered in t/pugsrun/07-uppercase-v.t: | |||
r10680 | audreyt++ | system("./pugs ... > tmpfile"); | |||
r10680 | audreyt++ | my $output = slurp("tmpfile"); | |||
r10680 | audreyt++ | unlink("tmpfile"); | |||
r10680 | audreyt++ | granted, we can work around that in the test by delaying | |||
r10680 | audreyt++ | the unlink() toward an END block, but somehow I don't think | |||
r10680 | audreyt++ | Perl programmers can be trained to do that... | |||
10:14
froh-doh joined
|
|||
theorbtwo wonders if the unlink could force the slurp, instead of just maximal-strictness. | 10:25 | ||
That sounds like a lot of work, though. | |||
Is Perl6-Pugs-6.2.12/docs/feather/~/gen.pl supposed to be in the pre0? It looks like a temp file... | 10:26 | ||
10:41
rashakil joined
|
|||
Juerd | It's ugly code, but not temp :) | 10:48 | |
<p> | 10:49 | ||
To update this listing, run <tt>perl gen.pl</tt> in <tt>pugs/docs/feather/~</tt> | |||
and wait for the automatic update. | |||
</p> | |||
11:09
mschmidt joined,
azuroth joined
|
|||
azuroth | yeah yeah, yeah the cow is back | 11:09 | |
11:17
weinig|sleep is now known as weinig|work
11:20
Ymmv joined
11:54
frederico joined
12:00
jsiracusa joined
|
|||
pasteling | "leo" at 195.3.113.168 pasted "pugs r10680 make test results" (12 lines, 834B) at sial.org/pbot/17711 | 12:01 | |
lambdabot | The title of that page is "Paste #17711 from "leo" at 195.3.113.168" | ||
QtPlatypus | mmmmm | 12:04 | |
http//www.arts.usyd.edu.au/ | |||
azuroth | sydney, eh? | 12:05 | |
12:06
iblechbot joined
|
|||
QtPlatypus was just wondering if lambdabot chases down every URL | 12:07 | ||
And yes I'm from sydney | |||
azuroth | I'm from newcastle :-) | 12:08 | |
QtPlatypus | And apprently the bot is from Sydney as well. | 12:09 | |
12:10
Aankhen`` joined
12:19
reZo joined
12:58
chris2 joined
13:07
szbalint joined
13:18
mako132 joined
13:44
rzoz joined
13:48
rzoz joined,
vel joined
13:53
rzoz joined
13:59
b_jonas joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r10681 | fglock++ | Pugs-Compiler-Rule - fixed a bug in <alpha> rule | 14:10 | |
14:12
FurnaceBoy joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r10682 | fglock++ | Pugs-Grammar-Perl6 - works again; s/Rule/Regex/ for now | 14:25 | |
14:37
fglock joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r10683 | fglock++ | Pugs-Compiler-Rule - version 0.05 in CPAN | 14:37 | |
fglock | audreyt: is it ok to remove Pugs-Compiler-Rule form perl5/ ? | 14:38 | |
14:42
pjmm left
14:44
bjoern_ joined
14:45
bjoern_ joined
|
|||
fglock | s/form/from/ | 14:46 | |
scw | fglock: Hi, I'm facing my homework/course project/final exams these days | 14:48 | |
fglock | scw: hi! | 14:49 | |
scw | (seems it's our first responsed irc chat :p) | 14:50 | |
fglock | I've been working mostly off-line too :) | 14:51 | |
with the last fix, text constants work again - you don't need to use <'text'> | 14:52 | ||
scw | oh, so that's the reason! | ||
ya, I choose the ugly syntax since simple text didn't work | 14:53 | ||
14:55
sahadev joined
15:05
nothingmuch joined
|
|||
fglock | lunch & | 15:06 | |
15:07
fglock left,
Maddingue joined
15:24
ruoso joined
15:40
justatheory joined
|
|||
spinclad | 10675 test results: | 16:03 | |
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed | |||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
t/oo/proxy.t 18 6 33.33% 4 6 9 13 15 18 | |||
942 subtests skipped. | |||
Failed 1/521 test scripts, 99.81% okay. 6/9479 subtests failed, 99.94% okay. | |||
(x86 debian linux, embedded perl5 and parrot) | 16:05 | ||
16:26
ushi joined
16:30
bernhard joined
16:36
unobe left
|
|||
svnbot6 | r10684 | fglock++ | Pugs-Grammar-Perl6 - <ident> rewritten to perl6 | 16:39 | |
16:41
sahadev joined
16:48
weinig|work joined
16:51
ludan joined
17:11
buetow joined
17:42
kcwu joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r10685 | fglock++ | Pugs-Compiler-Rule - implemented :Perl5 switch | 17:52 | |
18:03
ushi left
18:05
elmex joined
18:18
DaGo joined,
Ymmv joined
|
|||
sahadev | hello, i have a question about file I/O in Perl6. does the "File" object let me do something like: | 18:21 | |
$fh.readline -> $line { say (++$i).as("%4d: ", $line } | |||
PerlJam | What specifically are you asking | 18:28 | |
? | |||
sahadev | PerlJam: i guess i am asking if the file object provides an interator method which can take arbitray block of code | 18:29 | |
18:30
Aankh|Clone joined
|
|||
sahadev | s/interator/iterator/ | 18:30 | |
PerlJam | Um ... probably not given that we have "for" as the universal iterator. for =$fh -> line { ... } | ||
or, I suppose that could be spelt for $fh.readline -> $line { ... } (given the inherent laziness of perl6) | 18:31 | ||
sahadev | ah. ok. | ||
18:34
penk joined
18:35
justatheory joined
|
|||
sahadev | also, what is the equivalent of $. special variable? | 18:36 | |
nevermind. found it. | |||
$?LINE | 18:37 | ||
thanks. | |||
hmm. looks like I misread the meaning of $?LINE. it doesn't look like the equivalent of $. (which is the line number that has just been read). it seems to be the equivalent of __LINE__. is it? | 18:42 | ||
spinclad | yes | ||
PerlJam | probably. $?mumble are compile-time thingies | ||
sahadev | so, what is the equivalent in Perl6 of $. of Perl5? | ||
PerlJam | sahadev: perhaps $fh.line. perhaps +$fh | 18:43 | |
perhaps boths | |||
er, both | |||
sahadev | neither of them work in recent pugs | ||
18:44
reZo joined
|
|||
PerlJam | unless I've forgotten how to read haskell, it doesn't appear to be implemented at all. | 18:47 | |
sahadev | ok. thanks again. | 18:48 | |
19:25
SamB joined
19:48
Qiang joined
20:03
fglock joined
20:25
dduncan joined
20:39
mako132 joined
|
|||
dduncan | I am now beginning an identical smoke to yesterday of pre0, to possibly prove how transient the 1 failure was yesterday | 20:44 | |
regardless of the results, I will subsequently smoke the trunk | |||
the first should be done in 2.5 hours | 20:45 | ||
21:40
putter joined
|
|||
putter | audreyt: while smoke runs, here is a quick thought on the release notes, and expectation management. | 21:41 | |
I have been struck by the degree to which "normal professional perl folk" have written off p6. | 21:42 | ||
At a high-order 10 people perl mongers, a "who expects to try using p6 in the next year? two?" may not garner a single hand. | |||
Perhaps it's the years of "And now _this_ works! :)" announcements, notably from parrot, when, they never really do, and the whole thing isn't even vaguely usable anyway. | 21:44 | ||
21:46
larsen joined
21:47
froh-doh joined
|
|||
putter | *If* we want to begin changing that, gathering attention now-ish, rather than waiting for pugs to be "tada, it works!", then it seems like there is an exercise in expectation management. | 21:47 | |
Ie, a release note should ideally provide the reader with a thorough and accurate expectation of what will and wont work, and how well. Ideally so noone who tries it will be at all surprised by what is/isnt working. | 21:49 | ||
I don't think we've ever really written that paragraph. STATUS was something like it for a while, but was still more a grabbag of facts, requiring the reader to form their own expectation by reading between the lines. | 21:51 | ||
21:51
Ymmv joined
|
|||
putter | And there is much important expectation info which is never really documented, except transiently on irc. | 21:53 | |
Eg, Q - do objects work? A - not really. There is a large directory of passing oo tests, and many small modules have been written. But no-one has ever written a large oo program in p6. Type inferencer and other bugs have made that infeasible. The hope was to fix them in May. Of 2005. Ther | 21:58 | ||
e is no current estimate on when there might be some progress. | |||
21:59
weinig|work is now known as weinig
|
|||
putter | Note how dramatically different this is than "we're passing all the oo tests again!". | 22:00 | |
Our tests are regression tests. We report "expected failure todo's" as successes. And it's been a long time since anyone really tried to spew a lot of (inevitably failing) tests based on the language spec. We're being much more incremental than that. | 22:02 | ||
Which is all fine for "us", an audience of pugs developers. But that's perhaps not the target audience of either the blog, or the release notes. | 22:03 | ||
Potential _users_ of pugs/p6 what will and wont work if they try it. | 22:06 | ||
Can I do oo? Some. Nothing big. Expect problems. "Been there for a year, maybe fix them this year" problems. | 22:08 | ||
You wouldn't even know from the "secondary literature" how much the perl6 design is still a work in progress. | 22:09 | ||
22:11
macroron joined
|
|||
putter | One could form an impression of "they've been trying to implement the spec for years, and still haven't managed it. either they're bozos, or the language is a disaster". Little actually says "the pugs/perl6 effort is one of _exploratory design and implementation_". Certainly not our release notes. | 22:13 | |
22:21
iblechbot joined
|
|||
PerlJam | putter: aren't we a bunch of bozos? | 22:22 | |
putter takes off his big red nose and floppy shoes | |||
no. | |||
PerlJam | putter: but in any case, I just read all that stuff you just wrote and I agree completely. | 22:23 | |
putter | "Perl6 is the exploratory language design and implementation effort which will result in the next major, and much richer, version of perl. Perl6 is [... audreyt had a nice sentence summarizing what p6 is from a CS perspective, illustrating neatness and challenge...]. It's taking a while because it hard, we'r | 22:30 | |
e a handful of people working unfunded in our spare time, limitations of the p5 runtime forced a non-incremental effort, and we've had project management problems. | 22:32 | ||
aside(eg, not part of intro paraphragh) - Creating as language which lets you do what you want to do, flexibly and powerfully, is hard. CS research kind of hard. Perl6 will be a notable accomplishment in language engineering. With only something like mid-order 10 FTE's working on it, that takes time. Especially if the effort is a bit chaotic. | 22:40 | ||
PerlJam: nod | 22:45 | ||
hmm. need a "project journalist"? someone to go around and ask everyone "what are you working on? why? how? etc" and summarize. | 22:47 | ||
running late. smoke still in progress. yay, a preflight. cheers & | 22:49 | ||
PerlJam: given agreement, the next question is "what to do?", what might be usefully added to our todo list... | 22:50 | ||
& | |||
22:54
Maddingue joined
|
|||
fishb0t | which synopsis is p6 open() doc'd in? | 22:59 | |
23:16
buubot joined
23:18
buu is now known as buubot,
buubot is now known as buu
23:19
buubot joined
23:23
buubot joined
23:27
trym joined
|