Check your feather email | spec.pugscode.org | paste: sial.org/pbot/perl6 | pugs.blogs.com | www.treehugger.com/files/th_images/paradigm.jpg [set by audreyt on 2006-08-29 05:26:57 -0700] Set by Akwa|user on 14 September 2006. |
|||
00:20
Aankhen`` joined
00:21
justatheory joined
00:28
nekokak joined
00:36
frederico joined
00:37
markstos joined
00:44
mauke_ joined
00:49
mauke_ is now known as mauke
00:56
hikozaemon joined
00:58
f0rth joined
01:04
hexmode joined
01:16
kanru joined
01:18
SubStack joined
02:10
mako132_ joined
02:16
mjk joined
02:42
nothingmuch joined
|
|||
mugwump_ | hmm, where did class XXX is Tuple { } come from? | 02:47 | |
TimToady | I give up. | 02:52 | |
mugwump_ | ok, darren did make it up :) | 02:53 | |
I see Tuple as a parametric role | |||
eg: class XXX does Tuple[ Int, Str ] { ... } | |||
Pair should subclass it | 02:54 | ||
TimToady | in that case a Pair would be unordered, according to the relational def of Tuple. | 02:55 | |
mugwump_ | Then, Pair also has .key, .value and .kv methods that are RW methods to self.[0], self.[1] and self.[0,1] | ||
oh, that seems odd - I would have thought that tuples were strictly ordered | |||
TimToady | depends on which def of Tuple you're using. | 02:56 | |
we renamed tuples to Seq in Perl 6 to avoid the problem | |||
mugwump_ | Oh yeah | ||
TimToady | so I don't care if Darren uses Tuple for what he wants. | 02:57 | |
mugwump_ | I'm note sure what I'd use a Tuple for in that case, why it would be different from a Set, and how you'd apply its type constraints | ||
TimToady | well, gotta run & | ||
mugwump_ | ok, seeya | 02:58 | |
svnbot6 | r13464 | audreyt++ | * Source file expandtab. | 03:00 | |
mugwump_ | oh, tuple is not a real perl6 type | 03:05 | |
03:33
ron joined
03:51
zgh joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r13465 | audreyt++ | * Pugs.cabal.in: Oops, accidentally left a -debug in there | 04:06 | |
r13466 | audreyt++ | * PCR: Add HsBridge to MANIFEST. | |||
04:06
zgh joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r13467 | audreyt++ | * "if $x -> $y {...}" now evaluates $x in rvalue context, | 04:09 | |
r13467 | audreyt++ | such that "if $x -> $y is rw {...}" still cannot modify | |||
r13467 | audreyt++ | the original $x. (I think that's the correct semantic, | |||
r13467 | audreyt++ | though it's not really specced.) | |||
r13468 | audreyt++ | * Now that t/xx-uncategorized/use_import_not_found.t passes, remove it | |||
r13468 | audreyt++ | as instructed by putter++. | |||
04:11
Eidolos joined,
zgh joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r13469 | audreyt++ | * PCR Match dump_hs: Fix named match result dumping. | 04:12 | |
04:16
justatheory joined
04:21
Sal joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r13470 | audreyt++ | * De-macroise Pugs::Internals::pi so it can be called normally. | 04:33 | |
04:39
ofer0 joined
04:43
mtve joined
|
|||
audreyt | @tell putter preulude_test now all passes. | 04:48 | |
lambdabot | Consider it noted. | ||
audreyt | @tell putter see r13471; your original syntax was a bit off -- in particular "our $*x" doesn't work yet, and s better written as $*x | 04:49 | |
lambdabot | Consider it noted. | ||
svnbot6 | r13471 | audreyt++ | * Allow binding to fully-qualified, uninitialized variables: | 04:51 | |
r13471 | audreyt++ | &foo::bar ::= sub { ... }; | |||
r13471 | audreyt++ | * Reorganize t/xx-uncategorized/prelude_test.t and Prelude.pm a bit | |||
r13471 | audreyt++ | so that they all pass now. | |||
r13472 | audreyt++ | * Remove a bogus "die" in rule_recursive.t. | |||
04:56
baest joined
|
|||
clkao | @tell fglock the overloaded & data::bind bug was fixed | 05:04 | |
lambdabot | Consider it noted. | ||
05:14
BooK_ joined
|
|||
Sal | what is "JQL"? | 05:21 | |
05:22
Daveman joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r13473 | audreyt++ | * Pugs.Lexer: Massive source code cleanup and warning avoidance. | 05:24 | |
05:25
Aankhen`` joined
|
|||
clkao | Jabberwocky Query Language? | 05:26 | |
TimToady | Just Quack Loudly? | 05:27 | |
audreyt | Junctional Quantum Library? | 05:29 | |
05:34
kanru joined
05:50
iblechbot joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r13474 | lwall++ | A few remaining holdouts on .as -> .fmt | 05:50 | |
r13475 | audreyt++ | * PCR: Pugs::Grammar::Base::prior: avoid a stack frame push, and disallow | 05:59 | ||
r13475 | audreyt++ | infinite recursion on <?prior>. | |||
r13474 | lwall++ | A few remaining holdouts on .as -> .fmt | |||
TreyHarris | TimToady: i just heard something from a friend who's recently immersed herself in Perl, and i think it will either amuse or disturb you: "did I mention that I had a weird dream last night? I dreamed that in the hands/voice of some person, perl regexp were The Word made manifest, and when spoken would change the world." | 06:08 | |
06:12
Aankh|Clone joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r13476 | lwall++ | use @() where .[] doesn't work yet. | 06:15 | |
r13477 | audreyt++ | * prior.t: unTODO. | 06:18 | ||
r13478 | lwall++ | Changing splat to [,] in splat.t | 06:23 | ||
TimToady | audreyt: currently .[] are id, but I think they should do the same as @(). | 06:37 | |
that is, %HoA{$x}[] should flatten in list context like @(%HoA{$x}) | 06:38 | ||
TreyHarris | why does Test.pm use &Test::ok.goto? | 07:06 | |
ok, i see why | 07:07 | ||
07:20
dduncan joined
|
|||
dduncan | fyi, I've decided for the near future to name the relational data model concepts of "tuple" and "relation" as Set::Tuple and Set::Relation ... among other things, having the Set:: prefix for both should make it unambiguous that I am talking about unordered types, each of which .does(Set) or a restricted version thereof | 07:22 | |
and Seq already covers the ordered concept of a tuple | |||
the 2 Set:: types .does(Set) in a fashion resembling how I conceive that Mapping also .does(Set) | 07:23 | ||
TreyHarris | ?eval sub ($a) { say "$a" }.("hi") | 07:24 | |
07:24
evalbot_r13433 is now known as evalbot_r13478
|
|||
evalbot_r13478 | OUTPUT[hi ] Bool::True | 07:24 | |
TreyHarris | is that correct behavior? seems a little *too* dwimmy to me | ||
dduncan | similarly, if Perl 6 never has a built-in type simply named Tuple, we can avoid all confusion and be happy | 07:26 | |
TimToady | ?eval (1..100).grep: { /1/ }.say | ||
evalbot_r13478 | Error eval perl5: "use lib '/home/audreyt/pugs/perl5/Pugs-Compiler-Rule/lib'; use Pugs::Runtime::Match::HsBridge; 'Pugs::Runtime::Match::HsBridge'" *** 'require' trapped by operation mask at (eval 31) line 1. *** Cannot parse regex: 1 *** Error: Error: Can't call method "__RUN__" on an undefined value. | ||
TimToady | ?eval (1..100).grep: { m:P5/1/ }.say | ||
evalbot_r13478 | pugs: internal error: startTask: Can't create new task Please report this as a compiler bug. See: www.haskell.org/ghc/reportabug | 07:27 | |
lambdabot | Title: 1.2. Reporting bugs in GHC | ||
TimToady | ?eval 42 | ||
evalbot_r13478 | 42 | ||
TimToady | ?eval (1..100).grep:{ m:P5/1/ }.say | ||
evalbot_r13478 | pugs: internal error: startTask: Can't create new task Please report this as a compiler bug. See: www.haskell.org/ghc/reportabug | ||
lambdabot | Title: 1.2. Reporting bugs in GHC | ||
TimToady | ?eval (1..100).grep:{ not $_ % 7 }.say | 07:28 | |
evalbot_r13478 | OUTPUT[714212835424956637077849198 ] Bool::True | ||
TimToady | ?eval (1..100).grep: { not $_ % 7 }.join(' ').say | 07:29 | |
evalbot_r13478 | OUTPUT[7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70 77 84 91 98 ] Bool::True | ||
07:30
gugod joined
07:42
simcop2387 joined
07:47
chromo joined
07:48
chromo left
|
|||
TreyHarris | should macros introduce a new CALLER frame? | 07:48 | |
?eval \() | 07:49 | ||
evalbot_r13478 | CCall "perl" CaptMeth {c_invocant = VPure (CaptSub {c_feeds = []}), c_feeds = [MkFeed {f_positionals = [], f_nameds = {}}]} | ||
TreyHarris | ?eval sub foo { say "hi!" }; &foo.call(\()) | 07:50 | |
evalbot_r13478 | Error: No compatible subroutine found: "&call" | ||
svnbot6 | r13479 | Darren_Duncan++ | ext/Set-Relation/ : renamed, reduced the member classes to just Set::Tuple and Set::Relation | 07:53 | |
dduncan | as a side-effect, there should not be any test failures with my modules left | 07:54 | |
question: is Perl's big-num support open-ended, to be limited only by hardware, or is there program-defined explicit maximum size, which just happens to be very large ? | 07:56 | ||
so to make the numerical types into a finite domain type? | 07:57 | ||
not that they wouldn't be finite anyway, due to hardware limits | |||
or never minde | |||
fyi, the Pugs build process remains without errors for me ... reported version is r13479 | 08:04 | ||
that is all | |||
08:04
dduncan left,
elmex joined
08:08
ludan joined,
penk joined
|
|||
TreyHarris | ?eval macro saaay (Str $foo) { q:code { say $foo } }; saaay "hi" | 08:10 | |
08:10
evalbot_r13478 is now known as evalbot_r13479
|
|||
evalbot_r13479 | Error: Undeclared variable: "$foo" | 08:10 | |
TreyHarris | how does one refer to $foo? i've read S06/Macros, Quasiquoting, Splicing several times but I'm still not sure | ||
?eval macro saaay (Str $foo) { q:code { say {{{ $foo }}} } }; saaay "hi" | 08:12 | ||
evalbot_r13479 | OUTPUT[<SubBlock(<anon>)> ] Bool::True | ||
TreyHarris | oh, i'm confused. | 08:13 | |
08:19
kane-xs joined
|
|||
bsb | TreyHarris: the spec and the implementation of macros are from different realities | 08:19 | |
TreyHarris | bsb: ah. ok. *sigh* | 08:21 | |
i just got Test.pm working with macro versions of Test::eval_*, which is nice because then the eval can happen in the calling scope. | 08:22 | ||
but the line number diags are wrong | |||
and i was trying to find a workaround | |||
but I guess this isn't going to be a fruitful line of pursuit if macros don't work as specced... | 08:23 | ||
bsb | I'm not sure of the current state of macros, I should confess | ||
but I don't think they've been worked on in a while | |||
audreyt | indeed | 08:24 | |
TreyHarris: nopaste a small example of line number brokage? | |||
TreyHarris | audreyt: ok, one moment so i can produce a 'small' example :-) | ||
svnbot6 | r13480 | audreyt++ | * Pugs.Parser: dummyParam seems unused; prepend it with _ for now. | 08:25 | |
r13480 | audreyt++ | (gaal++: Are you planning to use it?) | |||
bsb | hi audreyt | ||
audreyt | heya | ||
08:27
timbunce joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r13481 | audreyt++ | * Pugs.Embed.Perl5: In safe mode, allow PCR to be invoked | 08:27 | |
r13481 | audreyt++ | more than once. | |||
pasteling | "TreyHarris" at 207.171.180.101 pasted "test 4 fails, new CALLER introduced" (40 lines, 743B) at sial.org/pbot/19815 | 08:29 | |
audreyt | timbunce: hi! | ||
timbunce | audreyt: hi! Just passing through... rebooted my laptop and my irc client starts automattically. | 08:30 | |
gaal | audreyt: yes, it should be used when a param is just a siglet. | 08:31 | |
(er, dummyParam) | |||
audreyt | timbunce: aha. hadn't noticed there's a #perl6dbi now | ||
timbunce: what's your email addr of choice so I can send you a metacommitter bit? | |||
TreyHarris | audreyt: paste above | ||
audreyt | gaal: *nod* | ||
timbunce | audreyt: [email@hidden.address] | ||
audreyt | TreyHarris: looking | 08:32 | |
I think we want a caller frame | |||
TreyHarris | timbunce: hi timbunce, you probably don't remember me but we had lunch when you spoke at amazon (earlier this year?) | ||
audreyt: in every case, or just that one | 08:33 | ||
timbunce | For a perl6dbi channel should I use irc.perl.org or freenode.net? | ||
kane-xs | greetings tim | ||
audreyt | timbunce: welcome aboard :) | ||
timbunce | TreyHarris: hi Trey. kane-xs: hi! everyone: hi! audreyt: Thanks, I think! | 08:34 | |
gaal | audreyt: I'm looking at your reply to the Unpacking tree node parameters thread (sorry for the slowness); am I correct that the implication of your answer is that there is never any ambiguity in omitting the top node? in that case siglets are only required for passing over invocants. | ||
TreyHarris | audreyt: i can agree with the closure case creating a new caller frame, but the string and AST ones can't require a new frame, can they? | 08:36 | |
audreyt | right | ||
what I was saying is that the as-working thing is not wrong | 08:37 | ||
so the final is() is in err | |||
imvvho | |||
gaal: there's no ambiguity inside a :() notation, aye. | |||
siglet is also usefun it | 08:38 | ||
:($, $, $) | |||
s/usefun it/useful it/ | |||
s/usefun it/useful in// | |||
audreyt evidentaly can't type. | |||
TreyHarris | audreyt: yep, makes sense, so i'll change that test before committing it. but with Code.call unimpl, and no way to get at the args of the macro from within an ast, i don't know how to get Test::eval_ working, since i must avoid creating a new caller frame | ||
08:38
timbunce left
|
|||
gaal | audreyt: that's okayeverybody likes a creative typo | 08:39 | |
audreyt | TreyHarris: you can use the &moose.goto(1) notation | ||
it does what you think it does | |||
TreyHarris | but i need a goto that returns :-) | 08:40 | |
otherwise the first test to use eval_is will also be the last | |||
gaal | do we perhaps need some sort of pragma or other mechanism to bless some call chain into using one stack frame generally? | ||
audreyt | TreyHarris: .call will land in 2min | 08:43 | |
08:44
knewt joined
|
|||
TreyHarris | audreyt++: *grin* cool. i need to go to bed but i will make and smoke overnight and look in the morning. thanks! | 08:44 | |
audreyt | np :) just note .goto() is actually just .call() | 08:46 | |
except the name got changed in Tokyo | |||
and I forgot to update it :) | |||
thanks for the reminder | |||
Juerd | .call replaces current sub, like exec replaces proces? | ||
TreyHarris | eh? | ||
Juerd | process | ||
audreyt | yes. | 08:47 | |
well, not really | |||
.call returns, as TreyHarris observes. | |||
08:47
arhuman joined
|
|||
arhuman | hi | 08:47 | |
Juerd | Ah | ||
Then it's not goto-ish. | |||
audreyt | right. | ||
which is why the name gets changes. | 08:48 | ||
changed. | |||
Juerd | Good idea then :) | ||
svnbot6 | r13482 | audreyt++ | * Argumentless POD introducer can now be followed by =cut correctly. | ||
r13482 | audreyt++ | =foo | |||
audreyt | arhuman: greetings! | ||
svnbot6 | r13482 | audreyt++ | =cut | ||
r13482 | audreyt++ | say "This gets run"; | |||
r13483 | trey++ | [t/macros/caller.t] | |||
r13483 | trey++ | Tests for CALLER frame introduction in macros. | |||
TreyHarris | then goto &sub has no methodish form? | ||
Juerd | Hello, arhuman | ||
TreyHarris: I don't think we should want that. | |||
audreyt | arhuman: arnaud dot assad at free dot fr? :) may I send a commit bit your way? | ||
Juerd | TreyHarris: Because it probably already works :) | 08:49 | |
arhuman | Mu god is this that fast ! | ||
s/Mu/My/ | |||
TreyHarris | audreyt: if you're just renaming .goto to .call, then i don't think it works, because in my current build, &subname.goto does not return | ||
arhuman | audreyt: yes, I have to practice my Perl to be useful, but I'm planning to contribute, so : yes thanks | 08:50 | |
audreyt | TreyHarris: worry not :) | 08:51 | |
arhuman: cool -- add yourself to AUTHORS to test commit | 08:52 | ||
welcome aboard :) | |||
audreyt has improved her commit-bit-handing-fu | |||
TreyHarris | audreyt: no kidding... do i want to know how you get people's email addresses seemingly out of thin air? | ||
audreyt | TreyHarris: whois followed by google | 08:53 | |
TreyHarris | ok. i was afraid it was going to be something very audreyt-like and scary. ;-) | 08:54 | |
Juerd | audreyt++ # good people grabbing skills | 08:55 | |
08:55
f0rth joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r13484 | trey++ | [t/macros/caller.t] | 08:57 | |
r13484 | trey++ | Corrected test description text. | |||
audreyt | .call lands | 09:00 | |
svnbot6 | r13485 | audreyt++ | * Implement &foo.call() as specced in S06. | ||
09:00
f0rth joined
|
|||
TreyHarris | yowza. now that i'm about ready to go to bed, my tooth i had the emergency root canal on today is really starting to hurt :-/ | 09:00 | |
audreyt++ | |||
Juerd | audreyt: What's the diff between .() and .call()? | 09:02 | |
obra | morning | ||
TreyHarris | Juerd: .call doesn't introduce a new caller stack | ||
Juerd | Hi | ||
But it does return? | |||
audreyt | Juerd: .call erases the current frame | ||
.call calls on behalf of its caller | 09:03 | ||
yes. | |||
Juerd | Weird :) | ||
audreyt | useful though :) | ||
Juerd | Very! I've often wanted this | ||
integral | the same as "goto &" though? | ||
audreyt | in p5 the alternative is to redefine CORE::caller | ||
integral: no, that does not return | |||
Juerd | And then usually fixed it by pushing a coderef onto @_, and then goto'ing. | ||
integral | oh, wow, that's cooler | ||
Juerd | ... or by adding stuff to %Carp::Internal :) | 09:04 | |
gaal | we need an examples/network/send-commit-bit! | ||
Juerd | I hope .call gets documented much like audreyt's explaining it now. | ||
TreyHarris | audreyt: lovely. one could read S06 as saying that .call can only take a Capture, not a bare set of arguments, but I think allowing either is nice... though not, i suppose useful except as sugar | 09:05 | |
Juerd | gaal: Write it? :) | ||
gaal | maybe! :) | ||
TreyHarris | ooogh. i'm now 40 commits behind on readinng pugs diffs. there's been a *lot* of activity this week! | 09:07 | |
everyone++ | 09:08 | ||
nothingmuch | yay! karma for everyone! | 09:09 | |
audreyt | TreyHarris: hm, well, hm, I misread the spec | 09:12 | |
indeed it only accepts a capture | |||
TreyHarris | audreyt: can't it take either? | 09:13 | |
svnbot6 | r13486 | trey++ | [src/perl6/Prelude.pm] | ||
r13486 | trey++ | corrected pathname to test in comment | |||
TreyHarris | oh, i guess for subs whose sig actually contain Capture, that would be ambiguous | 09:14 | |
audreyt | yeah. | ||
09:15
ruoso joined
|
|||
TreyHarris | but hey, people have been writing Perl 5 accessors that can't take 'undef' for years and years, we need to have *something* like that in Perl 6 ;-) | 09:15 | |
TreyHarris ducks | |||
09:18
Sal joined
|
|||
TreyHarris | reading between the lines, there seems to be a 0-ary form (or is an argumentless method 1-ary?) that passes on the arguments of the current sub call | 09:20 | |
audreyt | TreyHarris: where is it mentinoed? | 09:23 | |
TreyHarris | audreyt: it isn't. i was confusing .call with call. but this greatly bothers me; this is worse than select/select, because the two do very similar things | 09:26 | |
audreyt | well, .grep and grep does similar things too... | 09:27 | |
TreyHarris | ... and .call must always be equivalent to .call(), whereas call is different from call(). yuck. | ||
audreyt | actually not sure .call should be same to .call(). | 09:28 | |
TreyHarris | audreyt: yes, but they take similar arguments. .call(Capture) versus call, call(), and call(*), which doesn't take Capture... | ||
audreyt | yeah. point | 09:29 | |
TreyHarris | audreyt: oh? that would be great (except for string interp, you have to terminate the method name somehow) | ||
audreyt | easiest way is to rule that call() also takes Capture only. | ||
more concsistent, and avoids ambiguity | |||
TreyHarris | yes... can we have a thingie (or do we already have one and i missed it) for "the capture of the current arg list" so you don't have to spell out your called args again? | 09:31 | |
09:32
mdiep joined
|
|||
TreyHarris | $?ARGS or somesuch? | 09:32 | |
$?_ maybe? | 09:33 | ||
audreyt | or maybe eliminate the call; form... | ||
I'm not sure, actually. | |||
TreyHarris | well, for .wrap, it will be the most common form, i think | 09:34 | |
audreyt | that was the motivation, yes | ||
TreyHarris | and i'd hate for the most expeditious thing to be to change your nice self-documenting arglist to (\$capture)... | 09:35 | |
just because you don't want to type your 20 arguments twice in three lines... | |||
audreyt: shall i post to p6-l on this? | 09:37 | ||
audreyt | sure! please do | ||
note that .call() has to take capture | |||
because otherwise you cannot pass in an invocant into a method | 09:38 | ||
&meth(\($inv:)) | |||
would work but | |||
er | |||
&meth.call(\($inv:)) | |||
would work but | |||
&meth.call($inc:) | |||
is double-invocant | |||
and is explicitly syntax error | |||
TreyHarris | yes | 09:39 | |
09:42
kanru joined
|
|||
TreyHarris | incidentally, if .goto(*@args) is gone, then Test.pm will need to be refactored. unless goto &sub(ARGS) has suddenly become legal... | 09:48 | |
er... s/legal/special syntax/... | |||
audreyt | it's not gone | 09:49 | |
it's not specced either :) | |||
TreyHarris | *grin* | 09:50 | |
i guess you could walk your callers until you find one not in the current package... but i suspect that that's not something we want to have to do in a tight loop during smoketests.... | 09:52 | ||
audreyt | well, .goto is just return .call | ||
I think. | |||
though I'd like to keep it that way for now for this release | |||
TreyHarris | *nod* yes, probably not a good idea to break Test.pm massively right before release :-) | 09:53 | |
svnbot6 | r13487 | audreyt++ | * Pugs.Types: Add Capture and Signature to the type tree. | 09:55 | |
r13488 | audreyt++ | * Pugs.Val: asStr instance for PureInt. | |||
r13488 | audreyt++ | * Also make Feed a Monoid. | |||
audreyt | gaal: capture is back into our callconv :) | ||
(via .call(\()) | 09:56 | ||
svnbot6 | r13489 | audreyt++ | * Implement &sub.call(\(...capture...)) correctly. | ||
09:57
BooK joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r13490 | audreyt++ | * oops, typo | 09:58 | |
TreyHarris | ?eval multi moose () { say "0-ary" }; multi moose (Capture $capt) { say "unary" }; moose(); moose(\()) | 10:00 | |
10:00
evalbot_r13479 is now known as evalbot_r13489
|
|||
evalbot_r13489 | OUTPUT[0-ary ] "CCall \"moose\" CaptMeth \{c_invocant = VPure (CaptSub \{c_feeds = []}), c_feeds = [MkFeed \{f_positionals = [], f_nameds = \{}}]}" | 10:00 | |
svnbot6 | r13491 | audreyt++ | * PugsConfig.pm: Further expandtab. | 10:01 | |
TreyHarris | ?eval multi moose () { say "0-ary" }; multi moose (Capture $capt) { say "unary" }; moose(); moose(\3) | ||
evalbot_r13489 | OUTPUT[0-ary unary ] Bool::True | ||
TreyHarris | erm. is \() not a legal capture to express an empty arglist? | ||
audreyt | it is | 10:02 | |
same as [] a legal Array to express an empty list | |||
svnbot6 | r13492 | audreyt++ | * coro.t: unbreak two tests. | ||
audreyt | but still, you can't mix them. | ||
if you really want the canonical syntax is | |||
TreyHarris | so why didn't that work? | ||
audreyt | moose([,] =(\())) | ||
TreyHarris | \3 worked, but \() didn't | ||
audreyt | oh but \() worked just fine | ||
it's invoking the "moose" method :) | 10:03 | ||
as currently specced, moose($x) is always $x.moose first | |||
though that's going to go away anytime now | |||
TimToady is going to add in "method is export" I think | |||
but in any case. | |||
TreyHarris | oh... capture has a .moose method? | ||
audreyt | it doesn't, but at the moment all method calls into newland values | 10:04 | |
including \() literals | |||
is instead dumped as a string | |||
because it doesn't have a metaobject yet | |||
it will probably get that this weekend | |||
"under construction" etc :) | |||
TreyHarris | ok. fine. just so long as i can conjecture that call; could be reasonably replaced by call(), and call() by call(\()) | 10:05 | |
Juerd | TreyHarris: .moose is audreyt's new foo :) | ||
TreyHarris | moose is the new camel, and .moose is the new foo | ||
ludan | does moose belong to the camel family? | 10:06 | |
uhm no.. it belongs to the Cervidae family | 10:09 | ||
10:15
chris2 joined
|
|||
TreyHarris | I assume that S06:2121 should have a [,] reduction, and not the splat star it currently does? | 10:17 | |
audreyt | yeah, though I really think maybe call($args) is simpler | 10:21 | |
TreyHarris | except call() takes an arglist. hence my post to p6-l i'm writing :-) | 10:22 | |
audreyt | right. | ||
I think call() vs call(\()) | |||
is much better than | |||
call; vs call(); | 10:23 | ||
TreyHarris | i agree | 10:24 | |
audreyt: read your last diff, you missed one: "It can then be passed to C<call> as C<*$args>:" | 10:26 | ||
audreyt | fixed too | 10:27 | |
TreyHarris: how's your tooth? | |||
TreyHarris | audreyt: ouch :-/ root canal is no fun. | 10:29 | |
audreyt: now i just need a commit bit to the synopses, I just went to merge your changes into my p6-l post so there would be no discrepancy before posting, and there was no diff :-) | 10:30 | ||
audreyt | commit bit to the synopses is handed by $Larry not me :) | 10:31 | |
SamB | audreyt: what! | ||
hot-swappable Larries? | |||
or even cold-swappable? | 10:32 | ||
audreyt | the declarator for that is "constant" I'm afraid | ||
SamB | oh | ||
well. | |||
you have such odd syntax! | |||
TreyHarris | lol | ||
SamB | in almost any other channel, that would be an env var... | 10:33 | |
audreyt | you mean contextual... | ||
TreyHarris | audreyt: contextual subs? do they exist? you can do "my sub foo is context" but you can't use &+context... | 10:42 | |
audreyt | my &foo is context := {... } | 10:43 | |
&+context(moose) | |||
sure you can. | |||
TreyHarris | ?eval sub bar { &+foo() }; my sub foo is context { say "moose!" }; bar(); | 10:46 | |
10:46
evalbot_r13489 is now known as evalbot_r13492
|
|||
evalbot_r13492 | Error: No compatible subroutine found: "&ENV::foo" | 10:46 | |
TreyHarris | guess i'm doing something wrong. or is it unimpl? | 10:47 | |
audreyt | can't say "my sub foo is context" yet | 10:49 | |
have to say | |||
my &foo is context := sub {} | |||
TreyHarris | ?eval sub bar { &+foo() }; my &foo is context := sub { say "moose!" }; bar(); | 10:50 | |
evalbot_r13492 | Error: No compatible subroutine found: "&ENV::foo" | ||
audreyt | curiously: | ||
?eval sub bar { &+foo.call } my &foo is context := sub { say "moose!" }; bar(); | 10:51 | ||
10:51
awwaiid joined
|
|||
evalbot_r13492 | OUTPUT[moose! ] Bool::True | 10:51 | |
TreyHarris | ?eval my $foo is context = "moose"; say $+foo | ||
evalbot_r13492 | Error: Can't modify constant item: VUndef | ||
audreyt | $+foo doesn't see this sope. | 10:52 | |
scope | |||
the errmsg is misleading because %ENV is bound to undef | |||
TreyHarris | ?eval my $foo is context = "moose"; { say $+foo } | ||
audreyt | unde f safemode | ||
under safemode, even. | |||
evalbot_r13492 | Error: Can't modify constant item: VUndef | ||
audreyt | still no caller frame. | ||
?eval my $foo is context = "moose"; sub{ say $+foo }.() | |||
TreyHarris | ?eval my $foo is context = "moose"; sub { say $+foo }.() | ||
evalbot_r13492 | OUTPUT[moose ] Bool::True | 10:53 | |
TreyHarris | lol | ||
see? i told you, give me a commit bit and I'll do your examples for you ;-) | |||
ok, i think my fatigue has beaten my pain, so it's sleepytime for me. :-) | |||
audreyt | and I thank $deity for it :) | ||
TreyHarris waves | |||
audreyt | sleep well! | ||
TreyHarris | Zzzzz & | ||
10:56
iblechbot joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r13493 | audreyt++ | * S29_spec.t: TODO everything. | 11:05 | |
11:10
eden_c joined
11:12
buetow joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r13494 | audreyt++ | * Prettyprinting for signature default expressions. | 11:30 | |
r13494 | audreyt++ | (Doesn't prettyprint back to Perl6 yet.) | |||
11:44
mako132_ joined
|
|||
gaal | hmm, how'd you get away with r13494 on 6.4? I had a patch waiting for 6.6... :/ | 11:45 | |
11:46
ludan joined
|
|||
gaal | superficially looking I see yout put the prettyExp function in Exp.hs and not in Pretty.hs, where I'd been getting circularity errors, but I don't yet see why it solved those | 11:46 | |
11:49
agentzh joined
|
|||
agentzh | kolibrie: i'll fix the leftover .c file problem for *nix later. | 11:51 | |
that is a fault of judy's own build system. | |||
(not mine :)) | |||
11:52
lisppaste3 joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r13495 | agentz++ | [Makefile.PL] | 11:54 | |
r13495 | agentz++ | - cleaned up the rev number updating logic. | |||
agentzh | is anyone here on windows? | 11:55 | |
pugs building report on win32 will be appreciated. | 11:56 | ||
oh, judy compilation process on my cygwin is terribly slow. so i can expect it's also very slow on *nix. | 12:06 | ||
this is really unfortunate for *nix users. | |||
12:07
Limbic_Region joined
|
|||
agentzh | i'm guessing if there's too much magic involved in judy's Makefile, which slows down the building. | 12:07 | |
ajs said yesterday that Judy's Makefile should be removed by distclean. hmm...will add that to realclean. | 12:09 | ||
distclean is not under my control... | |||
svnbot6 | r13496 | audreyt++ | * formatQuite for Exp now dumps back into Perl 6 syntax (incomplete); | 12:13 | |
r13496 | audreyt++ | this enables Signature literals with defaults to prettyprinted | |||
r13496 | audreyt++ | back correctly. | |||
audreyt | gaal: signature.t all pass, arrr! | ||
Limbic_Region | agentzh - WRT whatever it is you wanted me to test yesterday. I did a realclean and wiped out third-party and was able to build just fine on Win32 | 12:14 | |
agentzh | Limbic_Region: glad to hear that! | ||
Limbic_Region | audreyt - some of those hiveminder tasks may be moot at this point. I can't be sure but it seems that some of them have magically fixed on their own. | ||
audreyt | ok :) | ||
I like bigs that magickally fix themselves. | 12:15 | ||
bugs, even. | |||
Limbic_Region | for instance - the all_parse.t which previously aborted on Win32 under the harness is now working | 12:16 | |
and there is another Win32 smoker who is apparently not having any problems with some of the web related tests in ext hanging | |||
agentzh | audreyt: are you interested in cygwin build failure reports? | 12:17 | |
pasteling | "agentzh" at 210.22.200.67 pasted "Cygwin build failure" (131 lines, 7.2K) at sial.org/pbot/19817 | 12:18 | |
agentzh | ingore it in case you're not interested. | ||
(in face i'm not very interested.) | 12:19 | ||
audreyt | gaal: sorry, was afk | 12:21 | |
gaal: would you commit the 6.6 branch of yours then? | |||
gaal: the trick is prettyExp :: Exp -> Doc | |||
agentzh: I'm not uninterested; let me think | 12:25 | ||
svnbot6 | r13497 | agentz++ | [Makefile.PL] | ||
r13497 | agentz++ | - renamed target "cleanjudy" to "judyclean" | |||
r13497 | agentz++ | [third-party/judy/Judy-1.0.3/cleanmore.pl] | |||
r13497 | agentz++ | - added this perl5 script to do extra cleaning work for | |||
r13497 | agentz++ | *nix judy. (this should fix the leftover .c issues | |||
agentzh | audreyt++ | ||
svnbot6 | r13497 | agentz++ | reported by kolibrie++) | ||
r13497 | agentz++ | [util/build_pugs.pl] | |||
r13497 | agentz++ | - added -e "Makefile" to *nix judy logic. | |||
r13498 | agentz++ | [third-party/judy/Judy-1.0.3/cleanmore.pl] | 12:29 | ||
r13498 | agentz++ | - warned "info: Leftover files removed." at the end of | |||
r13498 | agentz++ | execution (just to ease debugging of the "judyclean" | |||
r13498 | agentz++ | target) | |||
agentzh | kolibrie: with r13498, you should see the output "info: Leftover files removed." at the end of your "make judyclean" run. and there should be no leftover .c files under Judy1/ and JudyL/. :) | ||
audreyt: do you think if "realclean" should remove Judy's Makefile? | 12:30 | ||
removing Judy's Makefile significantly slows down *nix user's judy building process. :) | 12:31 | ||
audreyt | agentzh: try again? | ||
agentzh | ./configure is very slow, you know. | ||
not sure if it's worth it. | |||
audreyt | though realclean is not really part of regular build process | 12:32 | |
agentzh | audreyt: okay | ||
up'ing now | |||
audreyt | I think rm it is fine | ||
agentzh | okay :) | ||
audreyt | r13499 | 12:33 | |
12:33
Sal joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r13499 | audreyt++ | * Attempt to fix cygwin build by normalizing monfig_path | 12:33 | |
agentzh | building r13499... | 12:34 | |
(under cygwin) | |||
once cygwin build is working, i'll be able to test *nix logic in my win32 box. yay. | |||
12:36
weinig|away is now known as weinig
|
|||
agentzh | cmarcelo: why not use src/Makefile in Judy? | 12:38 | |
pasteling | "agentzh" at 210.22.200.67 pasted "audreyt: still failing..." (78 lines, 4.3K) at sial.org/pbot/19819 | 12:39 | |
Daveman | hehe, cygwin | ||
12:40
ofer__ joined
|
|||
agentzh | $ ls /cygdrive/d/ghc/ghc-6.4.2/bin/ghc.exe | 12:40 | |
/cygdrive/d/ghc/ghc-6.4.2/bin/ghc.exe | |||
it does exist. | |||
Daveman: hey | |||
12:40
ofer__ is now known as ofer1
|
|||
agentzh | weird. | 12:43 | |
audreyt | agentzh: rm util/*.exe | ||
and svn up | |||
and try r13500 | |||
agentzh | pugs/util/*.exe? | ||
audreyt | yeah | ||
agentzh | k | ||
svnbot6 | r13500 | audreyt++ | * more cygwin tweaks | 12:44 | |
12:44
discordja joined
|
|||
agentzh | oh...judy's configure is slow...i really hate it? | 12:44 | |
s/?/!/ | |||
s/\?/!/ | |||
:) | 12:45 | ||
audreyt | :) | ||
shower, bbiab | |||
Limbic_Region | audreyt - when you return, those tests in ext/ are still hanging for me so not sure what the difference is | 12:47 | |
agentzh | audreyt: same error... | 12:51 | |
pasteling | "agentzh" at 210.22.200.67 pasted "cygwin failure" (56 lines, 3.4K) at sial.org/pbot/19820 | 12:52 | |
kolibrie | agentzh: ok, will check sometime on .c files | 12:53 | |
12:53
arhuman left
|
|||
Daveman | Hi :) | 12:55 | |
svnbot6 | r13501 | agentz++ | [build_pugs.pl] | ||
r13501 | agentz++ | - improved the *nix judy building logic. | |||
gaal | audreyt: I had an Exp -> Doc. apparently the trick was putting it in Exp.hs and not Pretty.hs! :-) | ||
I'm away from my dev env, and it seems like you solved the problem? so i don't know if there's anything worth committing from my branch | 12:56 | ||
12:56
xinming joined
|
|||
gaal | moose. | 12:56 | |
12:57
penk joined
|
|||
audreyt | gaal: well, if you had a good pretty for Exp | 12:57 | |
12:57
rodi joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r13502 | audreyt++ | * another try for cygwin... | 12:57 | |
audreyt | I started prettyQuite for Exp to essentially become .perl | 12:58 | |
but it's very incomplete | |||
what else were in your branch? | |||
agentzh: try again | |||
13:00
agentzh joined
|
|||
agentzh | audreyt: i'll try 502 | 13:00 | |
13:01
vel joined
|
|||
agentzh | i think judy on *nix should build faster now. | 13:02 | |
not sure if it works since my cygwin... | |||
svnbot6 | r13503 | agentz++ | [Makefile.PL] | 13:03 | |
r13503 | agentz++ | - uses gmake for *nix judy (when possible) | |||
Limbic_Region | I can do a cygwin build here locally if absolutely necessary | 13:04 | |
13:04
eden_c left
|
|||
agentzh | audreyt: i've gone much further... | 13:04 | |
Limbic_Region would prefer not to though | |||
audreyt | good | ||
the key here is that all paths inside .exe must be of the form c:/foo | 13:05 | ||
not /cygdrive/c/foo | |||
agentzh | it fails in p5embed.c... | ||
i'll paste the errors. | |||
audreyt | ok, nopaste again? | ||
Limbic_Region | audreyt - out of curiosity, did you get the /msg I just sent you? | 13:06 | |
audreyt | just did | ||
pasteling | "agentzh" at 210.22.200.67 pasted "oh, it's incomplete...." (297 lines, 17.1K) at sial.org/pbot/19823 | 13:07 | |
agentzh | audreyt: sorry, it's incomplete, i'll paste again. | ||
pasteling | "agentzh" at 210.22.200.67 pasted "this time it's complete... :)" (561 lines, 43.3K) at sial.org/pbot/19824 | 13:09 | |
gaal | audreyt: oh, not any more detailed than that. prettyQuite's a terrible name really | 13:11 | |
the one eventually dispatched in the case of :($x = "this is a val") is the regular pretty | 13:12 | ||
audreyt | k. | ||
gaal | prettyQuite is for .guts | ||
and is usually just show x | |||
audreyt | ok, so I placed it in the wrong domain apparently | ||
gaal | uh, there may be a redundant layer there | 13:13 | |
i can clean up a bit when i get home | |||
13:13
cjeris joined
|
|||
audreyt | cool | 13:14 | |
agentzh: ok, try r13504 | |||
if it doesn't work, maybe we don't build perl5 embed for cygiwn | |||
gaal | ooh, we're unbreaking cygwin now? cool! | 13:15 | |
svnbot6 | r13504 | audreyt++ | * one more cygwin kluge. | ||
agentzh | k | ||
gaal: well, it's in process. :) | 13:17 | ||
*progress | |||
gaal | agentzh: not for the first time ;-) | ||
13:17
dakkar joined
|
|||
agentzh | *nod* | 13:17 | |
oh...i'm stilling building judy... | 13:18 | ||
too slow... | |||
audreyt: same error (i did realclean before "make fast" this time) | 13:21 | ||
audreyt | agentzh: oy.. | ||
agentzh | i wonder why it says "EXTERN.h: No such file or directory" | 13:22 | |
audreyt | agentzh: nopaste your pugs.cabal ? | ||
well that's because the embed flags had wrong directories in them | |||
that much is clear | |||
agentzh | got it. | ||
a sec... | |||
pasteling | "agentzh" at 210.22.200.67 pasted "my pugs.cabal :)" (23 lines, 2.8K) at sial.org/pbot/19826 | 13:23 | |
audreyt | yeah, it's as I feared | 13:24 | |
a sc | |||
13:24
crem_ joined
13:25
zakharyas joined
|
|||
Limbic_Region | should I bother setting up a Cygwin build as well or are the Cygwin problems not specific to agentzh? | 13:25 | |
agentzh | Limbic_Region: that'll be lovely! | 13:26 | |
Limbic_Region | and does GHC need to be a cygwin ghc or what? | ||
agentzh | i'm using win32 ghc. | ||
Limbic_Region | is that possibly a problem? | ||
agentzh | it works fine. | ||
audreyt | there's no cygwin ghc | ||
agentzh: try r13505 | |||
don't realclean | |||
Limbic_Region | I thought Pugs wasn't building? | ||
agentzh | k | ||
audreyt | after Makefile.PL ; make | ||
nopaste Pugs.cabal | |||
don't need to wait till Pugs.Embed | 13:27 | ||
agentzh | or "make fast"? | ||
audreyt | sure, that works too | ||
agentzh | i really hate "make" | ||
okay | |||
svnbot6 | r13505 | audreyt++ | * More cygpath. | ||
Limbic_Region | agentzh - I am not going to do the Cygwin build at work. Too much hassle. I will set it up at home though and build a cygwin GHC (which should prove to be fun) | 13:28 | |
agentzh | Limbic_Region: k | ||
audreyt | Limbic_Region: GHC is not known to build on Cygwin since GHC 6.2. | 13:29 | |
although #haskell will consider you a hero if you hacked the build system to do so | |||
I suspect it may not be fun. | 13:30 | ||
Limbic_Region | audreyt - I know more about the GHC build system then I do about GHC | ||
actually, a considerable amount more | |||
pasteling | "agentzh" at 210.22.200.67 pasted "my second pugs.cabal :)" (23 lines, 2.7K) at sial.org/pbot/19827 | 13:31 | |
Limbic_Region | and if all else fails, I could use MinGW inside the Cygwin environment. That should be a comprimise if I can't get it building strictly with Cygwin | ||
I never really understood why Cygwin offers MinGW as a package but I might as well make use of it | 13:32 | ||
audreyt | agentzh: ok, try again | ||
svnbot6 | r13506 | audreyt++ | * yet another try... | 13:33 | |
agentzh | ack. | ||
13:34
lanny joined
|
|||
agentzh | have i broken any *nix guy (or gal)'s pugs build? | 13:35 | |
(out of curiosity) | |||
Limbic_Region | as of what build agentzh - you could always check the smoke server | ||
agentzh | Limbic_Region: i hear that. :) | 13:36 | |
Limbic_Region | linux works at least up to r13478 | ||
agentzh | audreyt: nopaste pugs.cabal again? | ||
Limbic_Region | darwin up to r13500 | ||
agentzh | Limbic_Region: i need reports since r13503. | ||
rodi | agentzh: I'm smoking 13503 right now, but it built fine. | 13:37 | |
agentzh | rodi: thanks :) that's sufficient to me. | ||
pasteling | "agentzh" at 210.22.200.67 pasted "my 3rd pugs.cabal :)" (23 lines, 2.8K) at sial.org/pbot/19829 | ||
agentzh | src/Pugs/Embed/../../perl5/p5embed.h:5:20: EXTERN.h: No such file or directory | 13:38 | |
same error here... | |||
13:39
buubot joined
|
|||
lanny | Hi all. Got sort of a "vision" question. If there is stuff in Pugs that's Pugs::Internal that could be Perl 6 should I move it over or just leave it alone? I've read through the "About Pugs" pages but can't make an easy determination. | 13:40 | |
Limbic_Region | audreyt - WRT p5embed.h, couldn't that be a generated file so that p5 could be queried as to the proper location for the include instead of trying to rely on modifying -I path? | 13:41 | |
I guess that really is 6 of one and half a dozen of the other though | |||
agentzh | audreyt: maybe /usr/lib/perl5/5.8/cygwin/CORE should be converted to D:/cygwin/usr/lib/... or something like that? | 13:42 | |
Limbic_Region | lanny - (this is just my opinion), at the very least you should write the p6 code so that if it IS a good idea, the work has already been done | 13:43 | |
lanny | Ok. Got that far. :) I guess drop it in uspecced like sort? (Although all this stuff is specced so makes me wonder.) | 13:44 | |
agentzh | audreyt: actually ENTERN.h is in /lib/perl5/5.8/cygwin/CORE instead of /usr/lib/perl5/5.8/cygwin/CORE on my machine. | ||
Limbic_Region | lanny - I would go ahead and put it in Prelude but not activate the code | 13:45 | |
and then ping audreyt again (or gaal) when you have their undivided attention | |||
because I think the answer is "it depends" | |||
there is some code intentionally not in there because of the effects it has on the build | 13:46 | ||
I don't know the specifics though | |||
lanny | Yep. And that's the caveat I was seeing as well. | ||
svnbot6 | r13507 | arhuman++ | Added myself in the AUTHORS file for my first commit (asked by Audrey) | 13:48 | |
13:49
lisppaste3 joined
13:50
cjeris left
|
|||
agentzh | audreyt: i'll take care of the cygwin issue myself. | 13:52 | |
lanny | Thanks again, Limbic. | 13:53 | |
13:55
cjeris joined
14:06
Odin-LAP joined
14:09
webmind joined
|
|||
agentzh is busy studying the pugs build system... | 14:14 | ||
fortunately it's perl5. :) | |||
14:19
Qiang joined
14:21
KingDiamond joined
|
|||
agentzh | audreyt: i've got much further now. | 14:33 | |
win32 ghc under cygwin is really a source of pain!!! | |||
i'm looking forward to Limbic_Region's cygwin ghc. | 14:34 | ||
in the meantime, i'll have to add some evil magic to the build system... | |||
14:34
shachaf_ joined
|
|||
agentzh | with luck, cygwin pugs will build tonight. :) | 14:37 | |
wilx | How can there be Cygwin pugs when there is no Cygwin GHC? | 14:39 | |
Limbic_Region | wilx - use a Win32 GHC | 14:40 | |
agentzh | Limbic_Region: is there a way to get the installation path of cygwin in cygwin perl? | 14:44 | |
for example, environment variable... | 14:45 | ||
i really don't want to refactor build_pugs.pl too much. | 14:46 | ||
audreyt | agentzh: you want `cygpath` | 14:47 | |
`cygpath -w /usr` | |||
gives c:\cygwin\usr | |||
agentzh | ah | ||
thanks! | |||
audreyt | np :) see Makefile.PL's usage | 14:48 | |
agentzh | k | ||
ajs | Am I misunderstanding v6, or is this output wrong: perl -e 'use v6-alpha; ' - 'for (1=>2)->$n,$m{say "$n with $m"}' | ||
1 with 2 | |||
audreyt | that's likely broken. | 14:49 | |
ajs | ok | ||
I'm trying to proof some of my example code from Functions.pod, but nothing can handle it ;) | |||
14:50
blibbet joined
|
|||
agentzh | cygpath is so nice. | 14:51 | |
svnbot6 | r13508 | audreyt++ | * Pugs.Parser: Parse for | 15:13 | |
r13508 | audreyt++ | repeat { | |||
r13508 | audreyt++ | } | |||
r13508 | audreyt++ | while 1; | |||
r13508 | audreyt++ | as specced; the lone-closing-brace rule doesn't apply here. | |||
r13508 | audreyt++ | * Pugs.Eval: Allow "redo" to redo the first repeat loop. | |||
r13508 | audreyt++ | (repeat.t now all passes.) | |||
r13509 | audreyt++ | * repeat.t: Take away an unneccessary eval. | |||
audreyt | agentzh: thanks a lot for the very accurate/comprehensive repeat.t :) | 15:14 | |
15:14
buetow joined
|
|||
audreyt | enough triage for today... g'nite lambdacamels :) | 15:14 | |
*wave* & | |||
Limbic_Region | sleep well audreyt | 15:18 | |
15:20
stevan joined
15:21
christopher joined
15:23
lichtkind joined
15:24
christopher joined
|
|||
ajs | night | 15:29 | |
15:30
justatheory joined
15:35
[mago] joined
15:36
agentzh joined
15:40
weinig is now known as weinig|bbl
|
|||
agentzh | anyone willing to explain what sub build_lib in build_pugs.pl does? | 15:41 | |
ohhh...i'm now at dirent.h | 15:45 | ||
15:46
prefiks joined,
theorb is now known as theorbtwo
15:47
frederico joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r13510 | ajs++ | Added classify per Damian pointing out that I missed it on p6l | 15:53 | |
ajs | Is "Lazy of Pair" a valid type for a return value? It seems it should be, but I'm not sure | 15:58 | |
15:59
mauke_ joined
|
|||
agentzh | oh oh oh...anyone can help me with "D:/cygwin/usr/include/sys/dirent.h:62: error: syntax error before "__ino64_t""? | 16:04 | |
16:04
ludan joined
|
|||
ludan | WTF | 16:05 | |
gaal | agentzh: probably an undefined type / incomplete include? | 16:06 | |
agentzh | not sure... | ||
16:07
Psyche^ joined
|
|||
gaal | can you pase line 62 and the one above it? | 16:07 | |
agentzh | sure | 16:08 | |
__ino64_t __d_dirhash;/* hash of directory name for use by readdir */ | |||
gaal | oh, this is inside a struct definition? | 16:09 | |
what's the line above this? | |||
pasteling | "agentzh" at 210.22.200.67 pasted "sys/dirent.h" (90 lines, 2.1K) at sial.org/pbot/19834 | ||
agentzh | that is the whole file... ;) | ||
yes, it's inside a struct definition. | 16:10 | ||
16:10
integral joined
|
|||
gaal | by eyeball at least that dosen't look like line 62! | 16:10 | |
16:11
blibbet left
|
|||
gaal | what file has typedef .* _off_t ? | 16:11 | |
16:11
davidfetter joined
|
|||
agentzh | looking | 16:11 | |
davidfetter | hi | ||
anybody seen flavio glock recently? | |||
mauke_ | the error seems to indicate that __ino64_t is undefined | 16:12 | |
lumi | Does cc just have no idea what sort of token it should get next? What's up with 'syntax error'? | ||
agentzh | D:\cygwin\usr\include/sys/_types.h:typedef long _off_t; | ||
D:\cygwin\usr\include/mingw/sys/types.h:typedef long _off_t; | |||
mauke_ | gcc-4 says error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before '...' | 16:13 | |
agentzh | oh | ||
i'm not sure if cygwin and mingw are compatible. | 16:14 | ||
the .c and .h sources are from cygwin while the gcc used to compile them is actually from ghc's mingw... | 16:15 | ||
that's really evil... | |||
mauke_ | well, the syntax is specifier-qualifier-list declarator-list ';' and gcc thinks that __ino64_t is part of the declarator-list | ||
agentzh dislikes these pieces of ugly C code... | 16:17 | ||
16:19
mauke_ is now known as mauke
16:20
DucK_ joined
16:23
Psyche^ is now known as Patterner
|
|||
pasteling | "agentzh" at 210.22.200.67 pasted "The latest Cygwin build failure" (73 lines, 5.9K) at sial.org/pbot/19835 | 16:23 | |
agentzh | anyone willing to look into this for me? | ||
it seems mingw's header is including a cygwin header...oh, no... | 16:25 | ||
by putting mingw's include path __before__ cygwin's, i went a bit further: | 16:28 | ||
16:29
[mago] joined,
davidfetter left
|
|||
pasteling | "agentzh" at 210.22.200.67 pasted "Now i'm already at Pugs.Embed.Perl5. (Previous HS modules have been cimpiled.)" (797 lines, 61.8K) at sial.org/pbot/19836 | 16:29 | |
agentzh | D:/cygwin/usr/include/cygwin/in.h:27: error: syntax error before numeric constant | 16:30 | |
what does that mean? | |||
the line 27 in in.h is: IPPROTO_IP = 0,/* Dummy protocol for TCP*/ | 16:31 | ||
this line is in enum { ... }; | 16:32 | ||
my C knowledge tells me it shouldn't be a syntax error. well... | |||
theorbtwo | Can you give us the prior few lines, up to the start of the enum? | 16:33 | |
agentzh | theorttwo: i'll nopaste the whole file. :) | ||
pasteling | "agentzh" at 210.22.200.67 pasted "in.h" (201 lines, 6.5K) at sial.org/pbot/19837 | 16:34 | |
mauke | agentzh: my guess is double inclusion | 16:36 | |
or rather, inclusion of another file that #defines IPPROTO_IP 1234 | 16:37 | ||
agentzh | yeah. it's very likely. :) | ||
[particle] | ack --cc IPPROTO_IP | ||
agentzh | what can i do? | 16:39 | |
i believe combining cygwin and mingw is a nightmare... | 16:41 | ||
16:42
justatheory joined
|
|||
agentzh | so maybe i can conclude that perl5 embedding doesn't work on cygwin... | 16:46 | |
i've spent many hours on it...sigh... | |||
gaal: do you have any idea on why pugs-fps-0.7 rebuilds everytime Makefile.PL is invoked? | 16:49 | ||
iirc, win32 build doesn't have this oddity. | |||
16:49
araujo joined
|
|||
agentzh | s/rebuilds everytime/rebuilds on cygwin everytime/ | 16:49 | |
after disabling p5 embedding, cygwin pugs is now building smoothly... :) | 16:51 | ||
to make cygwin p5 embedding a reality, i think we truly need a cygwin ghc instead of a mingw one. | 16:52 | ||
Limbic_Region: i'll rely on your work... ;) | |||
okay, cygwin pugs without p5 embedding is now built successfully. :) | 16:54 | ||
16:59
chris2 joined
|
|||
Limbic_Region | agentzh - out of curiosity - are you trying to imbed a Cygwin perl 5 or a AS perl 5 or some other perl 5? | 17:02 | |
agentzh | i've been trying to embed a cygwin perl5. | ||
17:03
xinming joined
|
|||
agentzh | hi, xinming :) | 17:04 | |
Limbic_Region | well, audreyt didn't seem to have a whole lot of confidence that I would be able to get a cygwin ghc working | ||
agentzh | Limbic_Region: me too. :) | ||
(sorry for that) | |||
Limbic_Region: so just go ahead and prove us wrong. :) | 17:05 | ||
Limbic_Region | agentzh - no offense taken | 17:07 | |
I actually am not as motivated to get ghc working on cygwin since I have pretty much abandoned cygwin - MinGW and msys do pretty much everything I need | 17:08 | ||
agentzh | Limbic_Region: *nod* | ||
ajs | heh... v6 translates "my A $x .= new(...);" to "my A; $x .= new(...)" | ||
more generally, it translates "my A $x" into "my A; $x" | 17:10 | ||
mauke | you should immediately write a japh that abuses this behavior! | ||
ajs | heh | ||
Well, given that "my A" is a syntax error, I'm not sure how.... | 17:11 | ||
svnbot6 | r13511 | agentz++ | - a few progresses toward cygwin pugs | ||
r13511 | agentz++ | (it builds now if p5 embedding is disabled.) | |||
[particle] | how about my open FH, '<', 'foo'; my FH $x = 'bar'; | 17:14 | |
probably not too useful in a japh though | 17:15 | ||
gaal | agentzh: everything in third-party has often exhibited this behavior | 17:18 | |
agentzh | gaal: okay | 17:19 | |
Limbic_Region: if you could test pugs on cygwin, i'll be delighted. :) | 17:21 | ||
(you can use win32 ghc and noperl5) | |||
Limbic_Region | agentzh - will be happy to tonight | 17:23 | |
but it really is a hassle to get things working on my work machine | |||
agentzh | yay | ||
Limbic_Region | As time permits, I will try | 17:24 | |
agentzh | k | ||
Limbic_Region | cygwin pugs, MinGW GHC, no perl5 | ||
agentzh | aye | 17:25 | |
Limbic_Region | cygwin pugs, MinGW GHC, AS Perl | ||
cygwin pugs, MinGW GHC, cygwin perl | |||
agentzh | wow | ||
Limbic_Region | cygwin pugs, cygwin ghc, cygwin perl | ||
the last one being a very long shot | |||
agentzh | hehe, cygwin ghc does not exist. :) | ||
Limbic_Region | ^^^^ | ||
agentzh | yes | ||
17:26
BooK joined
|
|||
Limbic_Region | agentzh - any hope of building ghc on cygwin (without bootstrapping which I refuse to do) means installing a bin distro of the last known working version | 17:26 | |
I believe audreyt said that was 6.2 | |||
agentzh | people building cygwin ghc == heros | ||
once there's a cygwin ghc binary, there will be no need to struggle with win32 ghc under cygwin any more. :) | 17:28 | ||
Limbic_Region | agentzh - small nit, once there is a CURRENT cygwin ghc binary | 17:30 | |
agentzh | right | ||
anyway, i've got a *working* cygwin pugs, though not an ideal one. | 17:32 | ||
at least i can use it to test the *nix part of the pugs build system on cygwin. | 17:33 | ||
it's good enough for tonight... | |||
1:31 AM here... | |||
agentzh waves & | 17:34 | ||
17:34
agentzh left
17:37
lisppaste3 joined
17:44
frederico joined
|
|||
nothingmuch | 3/w 21 | 17:49 | |
17:57
Aankhen`` joined
17:58
justatheory_ joined
17:59
ruz joined
18:06
marmic joined
18:18
KingDiamond joined
18:20
premshree_ joined
18:22
putter joined
|
|||
putter | boston area folks: iic.harvard.edu/event1.php Guy Steele on Fortress, at Harvard, Sept 27. | 18:24 | |
lambdabot | putter: You have 2 new messages. '/msg lambdabot @messages' to read them. | ||
Title: Events | |||
putter | audreyt++: thanks :) | ||
@tell spinclad colabti.de/irclogger/irclogger_log/...l=541#l869 | 18:25 | ||
lambdabot | Consider it noted. | ||
putter | @tell steven colabti.de/irclogger/irclogger_log/...l=541#l869 | ||
lambdabot | Consider it noted. | ||
Limbic_Region | steven or stvn ? | ||
Limbic_Region gets confused | 18:26 | ||
putter | doh. thanks LR. | 18:29 | |
@tell stevan colabti.de/irclogger/irclogger_log/...l=541#l869 | |||
lambdabot | Consider it noted. | ||
putter wonders if lambdabot ever gc's its messages... | 18:30 | ||
18:30
idiotmax joined
|
|||
[particle] hands putter a '/msg lambdabot' or two | 18:31 | ||
18:31
putter is now known as steve1,
steve1 is now known as putter
|
|||
putter | ah well. | 18:32 | |
18:33
tretboot joined
|
|||
putter | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortress_prog...g_language research.sun.com/projects/plrg/ | 18:33 | |
lambdabot | tinyurl.com/zl8hn | ||
putter | The rendering layer idea is interesting. research.sun.com/projects/plrg/fortress.pdf appendix D,E,F. | 18:34 | |
lambdabot | tinyurl.com/h36gd | ||
putter | Eg, basically there is a regexp over identifiers which controls face. font, italics, etc. based on length, capitalization, underscores, etc. | 18:36 | |
18:36
polettix joined
|
|||
putter | I prefer p6's direct use of unicode to the capital word "ALPHA" is rendered as unicode alpha, | 18:37 | |
but being able to control face too could be interesting. | 18:38 | ||
18:38
takesako joined
|
|||
putter | Though neither gets you... ooo.... | 18:39 | |
18:41
tretboot left
|
|||
putter | How about a p6 module / domain specific language, TexMath? It processes something like... oh, too long since I've done tex, faking it, "\over{x}{y}" into "$x/$y". Other conventions for integrals, etc, etc. | 18:41 | |
integral | hmm, executable maths papers? handy :) | 18:42 | |
putter | So one can write a real 2D denotational semantics equation, and it really works (not an original idea, someone did a version in emacs, but I've never been able to find the link again). | ||
:) | |||
SamB | \frac{x}{y} is the one with the fraction bar... | 18:43 | |
putter | Appendix F goes through unicode chars, and attaches mathematically inspired constraints - eg, this is a x, which can be used with y but not z. | ||
SamB | I'm fairly sure | ||
integral | SamB: \frac is latex, \over is TeX | ||
putter | :) thanks | ||
integral | \frac{x}{y} = x / y = x \over y | ||
SamB | integral: hmm | ||
people actually use TeX? | 18:44 | ||
integral | sure | ||
SamB | (without LaTeX?) | ||
putter | lol | ||
SamB | people other than Knuth? | ||
integral | If you're replacing most of latex's page macros and fiddling with \output, using (plain) TeX can save some time | ||
SamB | true enough | 18:45 | |
putter | (a latex preprocessor would be quite nifty too...;) | ||
SamB | why? | ||
or rather, what do you mean by that? | 18:46 | ||
TreyHarris | SamB: 'TeX, without LaTeX' is referred to as 'plain TeX' ;-) | ||
SamB | TreyHarris: well. depends. | 18:47 | |
TreyHarris | latex's essentially a macro language (in somewhat the same sense as perl 6's macros, i.e. not just text-substituters) on top of tex. if you need something not provided by the macros, you have to drop into plain TeX. | ||
SamB | plain TeX is actually a format in its own right, isn't it? | 18:48 | |
putter | tex is a programming language. a dsl. latex is a macro library on top of it. | ||
re why?, so, let's see... | 18:49 | ||
TreyHarris | SamB: well... only if C plus the standard library is actually a language in its own right ;-) 'plan TeX' is TeX plus the standard control characters that every other macro package uses | 18:50 | |
s/characters/library/ | |||
s/plan TeX/plain TeX/ #geez | 18:51 | ||
Patterner | dsl? | ||
darn stupid language? | 18:52 | ||
[particle] | domain specific language | ||
Patterner | oops | ||
putter | the game is representing math. level 0 is p5, using words for function names. this approach can work nicely (eg, Sussman's Structure and Interpretation of Classical Mechanics, which uses scheme). | ||
[particle] | and, generally, darn stupid ;) | ||
see sql :) | |||
putter | mitpress.mit.edu/SICM/book-Z-H-5.ht...hap_Temp_2 preface, example mitpress.mit.edu/SICM/book-Z-H-11.html | 18:53 | |
lambdabot | mitpress.mit.edu/SICM/book-Z-H-5.ht...hap_Temp_2 | ||
putter tries to picture laPostScript. ;) | 18:54 | ||
level 1 is unicode characters, but linear text. | 18:55 | ||
s/linear/still linear/ | |||
i suppose level next is adding font info, but still being linear. | |||
level next (?) is going 2D | 18:56 | ||
either ascii art, '$x\n----\n$y' -> $x/$y | |||
stevan | hey putter | 18:57 | |
lambdabot | stevan: You have 1 new message. '/msg lambdabot @messages' to read it. | ||
stevan | thank lambdabot | ||
putter | or rendering an embedded language (tex example - texemacs did this, but google doesnt find good pointers... project dead?), | ||
hey stevan :) | |||
stevan | putter: looks like it could be a very intersting talk | ||
putter | or... what am I missing, there was another option...? | 18:58 | |
re talk, yes. would also be interesting to explore how he perceives the design space. | 18:59 | ||
stevan | putter: are you planning on going to the Boston.pm Damian talk on that monday>? | 19:00 | |
putter | SamB: so, re why, perhaps representing the domain (math) in it's normal way. which in some respects is an ambiguous and nighmarish way, and you would be much better off using scheme/p6, but... | 19:02 | |
stevan: think so, yes | |||
anyway, fortress looks neat. spec is nearing 1.0. | 19:03 | ||
19:05
justatheory_ is now known as justatheory
|
|||
putter | stevan: planning on going to either? | 19:05 | |
stevan | putter: pondering the Boston.pm meeting,... but now the fortress looks interesting too | 19:06 | |
19:06
integral_ joined
19:07
integral_ is now known as integral
|
|||
[particle] | say "DEBUG: " ~ $?MUNDANE.code; | 19:12 | |
putter | stevan: 4pm vs 7 | 19:13 | |
SamB: still chewing on that "why?"... I guess the core idea is that when a domain has a notation, it can be adventageous (mostly clarity, I think) to be able to present code in that notation, at least as a secondary representation. Math notation tends to be unacceptably ambiguous for coding, so a better dsl than latex might | 19:19 | ||
be one of the math interchange standard languages. | |||
svnbot6 | r13512 | ajs++ | Added question about sqrt Unicode alias | ||
SamB | mmm | ||
19:20
integral joined
|
|||
putter | There are unfortunately(?) several such, but no reason each can't get its own module. | 19:21 | |
19:25
pdcawley joined
19:26
mako132 joined,
jferrero joined
|
|||
putter | A takeaway idea might be that rather than p6 code assuming it never sees anything but a text editor, one might be able to set a framework up so a { use StateMachine; start -> blah blah blah } bit of code can perhaps result in a pretty diagram on the side, because the StateMachine module did something to declare "my dsl can be alternately rendered as ...". | 19:27 | |
One could even go further down that path, to read-write alternate representations, and direct manipulation. | 19:28 | ||
s/direct/direct domain-specific&optimized/ | 19:29 | ||
the big counter argument to all this is of course "you can't parse p6 without running it". but perhaps the editor can get not just parse info from it's p6 support backend, but also "can you give me a handle to the dsl on line 62, I'd like to chat with it about rendering...". ;) | 19:30 | ||
19:31
discordja joined
|
|||
putter | job interview practice & | 19:32 | |
19:39
Qiang_ joined
19:42
Corion joined,
Corion left
|
|||
TreyHarris | @tell putter actually, I asked TimToady and audreyt a couple weeks ago when the emacs & twigils issue came up, and apparently you *should* still be able to parse p6 without running it, perhaps excluding string-returning macros.... | 19:55 | |
lambdabot | Consider it noted. | ||
19:59
weinig joined
20:03
pdcawley joined
|
|||
avar | TreyHarris: I asked TimToady about function prototypes & parsing the other day and got the impression that you still needed to run it to parse it.. | 20:05 | |
PerlJam | avar: you only need to run things that munge the grammar, otherwise perl6 is statically analyzable. | 20:11 | |
avar: Like the macros that TreyHarris mentions | |||
TreyHarris | avar: huh. don't know how to reconcile that with his saying that editors could use perl to parse perl for their syntax highlighting and indention | ||
avar | I thought function prototypes were still an issue | 20:12 | |
something akin to BEGIN { time % 2 == 0 ? eval "sub meh () {}" : eval "sub meh (@) {}" } meh "foo", "bar", "mehness" | 20:13 | ||
SamB | isn't it dangerous to have code run when you open something in your editor? | 20:14 | |
avar | you don't need to run anything to provide a syntax tree, hopefully | 20:15 | |
[particle] | well, you need a parser to run | 20:16 | |
TreyHarris | avar: i'm having difficulty seeing where that would result in a compile-time, rather than a runtime, issue. meh would be a sub call regardless | ||
sub <-> meth fallback means you'll never catch that at compiletime | 20:17 | ||
avar | Whether something is a comment can depend on a sub prototype in p5, I was wondering about such cases for editors | 20:19 | |
20:19
ajs_ joined
|
|||
SamB | avar: hmm? | 20:25 | |
avar | SamB: www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node=44722 | ||
lambdabot | Title: On Parsing Perl | ||
20:29
pdcawley joined
20:39
discordja joined
20:59
Limbic_Region joined
|
|||
gaal | * can't work as a capture sigil? | 21:05 | |
21:06
BooK joined
|
|||
[particle] | how about < | 21:07 | |
or ? | 21:08 | ||
gaal | I think that would require backtracking to disambiguate from <moose elk> | ||
[particle] | this is going to be fun writing the parser for | ||
gaal | and ? is already boolean context. | ||
[particle] | well, we're changing one thing, why not a zillion others? (i'm joking, of course) | 21:09 | |
[particle] wishes he had an apl keyboard for perl 6 programming | |||
gaal hands [particle] U+2336 and then some | 21:10 | ||
[particle] | i've been thinking about writing apl tests in apl. i thought i'd use the check symbol from smartlinks for ok. | 21:11 | |
gaal | whee | ||
[particle] | i need symbols for is, like, and plan | 21:12 | |
perhaps i'll go shopping later | |||
[particle] imagines playing 'unicode wheel of fortune' | 21:13 | ||
gaal | sleepy time for me & | 21:14 | |
21:16
lanny joined
21:32
mdiep joined,
mugwump_ is now known as mugwump
21:57
henry_james joined,
henry_james left
22:00
cjeris left
22:04
Qiang joined
22:06
bernhard joined
22:16
xerox joined
22:23
Qiang_ joined
22:30
mako132_ joined
|
|||
nothingmuch | why isn't scalarness of captures just $$foo ? | 22:30 | |
audreyt | what is this scalarness thing? | ||
nothingmuch | what larry raised on the ml | 22:31 | |
i'm sure i just misunderstood the problem | |||
=) | |||
TimToady | that would be the invocant out of the $foo capture | ||
nothingmuch | ah | ||
so what does [,] =$capture yield? | |||
TimToady | the = expands the $capture to a "list", and the [,] makes it look like it was part of the original call. | 22:32 | |
I'm proposing a sigil to do all of that. | |||
nothingmuch | oh, for .call etc? | ||
TimToady | yes. | ||
nothingmuch | the flatten a capture into another? | ||
ahh... now everything is clicking | |||
TimToady | a capture sigil would autoflatten like @, only even further. | 22:33 | |
nothingmuch | *nod* | ||
why a sigil, and not e.g. a circumfix operator or something like that? | |||
that namespace is pretty hard to avoid collisions in | |||
that said, |foo does look pretty nice | |||
TimToady | could use it as a prefix operator | ||
audreyt | I like |foo. | ||
TimToady | but then you can do that with the other sigils too, kinda | ||
it "draws a line in the sand", er, in the argument list. | 22:34 | ||
nothingmuch | *nod* | ||
22:34
Qiang__ joined
|
|||
nothingmuch | and it looks pretty | 22:34 | |
^_^ | |||
oh | |||
i discovered the scarlett johansen smiley: | |||
^-^ | |||
TimToady | the who? | 22:35 | |
nothingmuch | compare: ^_^ ^-^ | ||
audreyt | d(-_-)b | ||
nothingmuch | fatbackandcollards.com/wp-content/u...-smile.jpg | ||
TreyHarris | |($inv: $pos1, $pos2, :name($arg)) etc? | ||
lambdabot | tinyurl.com/h9dvh | ||
nothingmuch | |\( ) looks kinda crookid though | ||
TreyHarris | TimToady: in t/macros/caller.t, I hypothesized that macros don't introduce a new CALLER frame except in the case of closure-returning macros. Sane? audreyt thought so, but I wanted to check with you, as I'm about to check regression on macro forms of Test::eval_*, so if not, I should hold off | 22:36 | |
nothingmuch | crapx00r spilled tea | ||
good thing the laundry basket is full =) | |||
TimToady | TreyHarris: no we still use \(...) to make them. |(...) would deref one. | 22:37 | |
like [...] is the opposite of @(...) | |||
22:38
rodi joined
|
|||
nothingmuch | hmm | 22:38 | |
TreyHarris | *nod* yep, that's what I was thinking, just thinko'd | ||
TimToady | I think macros should not introduce a CALLER frame if they can help it. | ||
audreyt | "use re 'PGE'" seems like a good-enough switch to reenable parrot behaviour. | 22:39 | |
TimToady | oh, the place you quoted from S06 (?) that said that .call throws away the CALLER frame isn't quite right. | ||
wrappers have CALLER frames, they're just officially invisible. | |||
otherwise how could you return to them? | 22:40 | ||
TreyHarris | yes, hence audreyt saying that .goto is essentiall a return .call | ||
TimToady | audreyt: yes, "use re 'PGE' would be one way to do it. | ||
audreyt | and there'll be more then one way to do it... | 22:41 | |
nothingmuch | macros are compile time calls, aren't they? in that sense they should have a CALLER Frame but only visible by other macros | ||
TreyHarris | but that's fine, invisible frames == nonexistant frames for my purposes (making Test::proclaim think I called it directly rather than from the macro) | ||
audreyt | nothingmuch: the thing returning by macros. | ||
TimToady | assuming that "return call" can throw optimize away the CALLER | ||
audreyt | nothingmuch: not themselves | ||
nothingmuch | ah | 22:42 | |
audreyt | TimToady: sure, as it's in tail call position | ||
nothingmuch looked for backlog, but appearantly not far enough | 22:43 | ||
what about *{ } ? | |||
is that taken by anything right now? | |||
(as in circumfix, not flatten rv of block) | 22:44 | ||
TimToady | that's Whatever.{ } | ||
nothingmuch | ah | ||
22:45
plural joined
|
|||
nothingmuch | anymoose, ENOBRANE | 22:45 | |
i wasted it all on beurocrats | |||
good night =) | |||
TimToady | g'night. | ||
nothingmuch | audreyt: is MO still on for fri/sat? | 22:46 | |
audreyt | nothingmuch: yes | ||
sat most likely it seems | |||
TreyHarris | well... if you have macro foo { outerSub1(); return q:code { innerSub(); } }, would outerSub()'s CALLER:: be the macro, and innerSub()'s CALLER:: the macro's caller? | ||
or would both be the macro's caller? | 22:47 | ||
audreyt | outerSub1's caller should be the macro, I think. | ||
TreyHarris | yes... for die() to work sanely without funny stuff in both places, it would have to | ||
(for example, die isn't special) | 22:48 | ||
nothingmuch | audreyt: okies, i'll have it ready by then | ||
audreyt | nothingmuch++ | ||
nothingmuch | nothingmuch--; # it's not ready yet | ||
premature karma is the root of all guilt ;-) | |||
TreyHarris | audreyt: is there an easy way for me to check for regression between two local smokes? squirreling away the yaml file before the second smoke and comparing them is easy enough, but i can't believe somebody hasn't rolled something before to do this... | 22:49 | |
22:50
azr|elious joined
|
|||
audreyt | TreyHarris: smoke diff? see on | 22:50 | |
TreyHarris: smoke diff? see nothingmuch | |||
TreyHarris looks at nothingmuch | |||
audreyt | havn't used it myself though, but iirc he has that code somewhere. | ||
nothingmuch | yes, i do | 22:52 | |
would you like me to finish it? | |||
i could do that on tuesday ish | |||
TreyHarris | well, i haven't tried it yet, but i'd be astounded if changing Test::eval_* in this way doesn't cause a lot of spurious regression and promotion | ||
nothingmuch: asleep yet? | |||
nothingmuch | no, copying files | ||
but supposed to be | |||
TreyHarris | nothingmuch: smoke diff would be useful, but don't knock yourself out, i can swag at the yaml easily enough. | 22:53 | |
svnbot6 | r13513 | audreyt++ | * Pugs.Prim.Match: Allow selection of PGE instead of PCR by | ||
r13513 | audreyt++ | setting an environment variable, PUGS_REGEX_ENGINE, to "pge" | |||
r13513 | audreyt++ | or "PGE". | |||
nothingmuch | it's already implemented | ||
the diffing | |||
in Test::TAP::HTMLMatrix | |||
just the smoke server has rough edges | |||
TreyHarris | oh, so what's for tuesday? | ||
22:54
Qiang joined
|
|||
nothingmuch | on monday i have a $work deadline | 22:54 | |
on tuesday i could spare some cycles | |||
and finish it off | |||
TimToady | I think it'd be cool if the differing boxes got a heavy border in the old color, or some such. Don't know if that's feasible in html though. | ||
nothingmuch | i'll whip up an example | 22:55 | |
sections which are the same are folded | |||
sections which are different are darkened | |||
and expaneded | |||
sections == single .t files | |||
with some Test::TAP::Model based filtering code we should be able to easily remove uninteresting chunks, too | 22:56 | ||
as discussed with Trey previously | |||
ok, copy complete | |||
TimToady | k, anything will be better that two side-by-side browser windows. :) | ||
nothingmuch | i'm off to bed | ||
TreyHarris | nothingmuch: *grin* sounds eerily like my javascript thingy that you never actually saw to show 'user-oriented failures' instead of developer-oriented ones | ||
nothingmuch | TreyHarris: what i'm brain dumping is based on your input =) | ||
i think you're forgetting our conversatio | 22:57 | ||
n | |||
i just want this stuff less dependant on Test::TAP::HTMLMatrix, and more in the Test::TAP::Model layer | |||
becasue TTH should be just a dumb presentation layer | |||
TreyHarris | i remember the convo, but since it didn't work in safari, you never actually saw my prototype :-) | ||
nothingmuch | link me again | ||
i've reinstalled FF since | |||
TreyHarris | ibiblio.org/harris/smoke.new.html | 22:58 | |
lambdabot | Title: TAP Matrix - Tue Sep 12 00:37:56 2006 GMT | ||
TreyHarris | there's a hard-to-see button right above the matrix | ||
and it doesn't toggle, just flips once. but it was just a quick swag at a prototype | |||
nothingmuch | TreyHarris: that's almost precisely what I had in mind | ||
but more reusable (not js based) | 22:59 | ||
TreyHarris | yup. cool cool, nothingmuch++. now go to bed :-) | ||
nothingmuch | aye | ||
*poof* | |||
TreyHarris | yay, my mac mini is on its way... i look forward to order-of-magnitude quicker smokes within a few days :-) | 23:01 | |
avar | Someone need a ppc smoker? | 23:02 | |
audreyt | $job calls... bbl :) | 23:03 | |
svnbot6 | r13514 | audreyt++ | * Makefile.PL: Remove the obsolete syck/cbits build flags. | ||
r13514 | audreyt++ | * INSTALL/Makefile.PL: Document the ways to use parrot/pge as | |||
r13514 | audreyt++ | the alternate regex engine, and tweak build messages. | |||
TreyHarris | avar: have you done one lately? | 23:05 | |
avar | TreyHarris: No, but if they need to be done I might as well set up a cron job | ||
TreyHarris | well, I'll probably continue to do them, as my laptop's what i'm using now. | 23:07 | |
but i've been very hesitant to touch much except for tests so long as a full smoke-compile-smoke regression cycle takes me 12 hours :-) | 23:08 | ||
Limbic_Region | audreyt - you b0rk Makefile.PL | 23:09 | |
Limbic_Region attempts to fix it | |||
grr - fixed, but apparently I have never checked in something using svn from this machine | 23:17 | ||
so I have to remember how to do that | |||
TreyHarris | Limbic_Region: new file or mod? | ||
if mod, just svn commit $filename | |||
Limbic_Region | no, the authentication | 23:18 | |
username and pass | |||
I figured it out | |||
checkin on its way | |||
svnbot6 | r13515 | Limbic_Region++ | Makefile.PL changed line 468 from print @warn << '.'; to push @warn, << '.'; | ||
TreyHarris | Limbic_Region: oh... hm. I'm going to need to know the same info when my new computer arrives tomorrow ;-) | 23:19 | |
Limbic_Region | TreyHarris svn help ci | ||
TreyHarris | clue? :-) | ||
Limbic_Region | --username | ||
there is also an option for password but it goes interactive if you don't provide one | |||
TreyHarris | ah, and then it remembers both from then on? | 23:20 | |
Limbic_Region | I think so - if not, there is a way to setup a .svn something or other to remember it | ||
I so seldom need to do it - I forget | |||
TreyHarris | i'll figure it out :-) | 23:21 | |
23:22
Aankhen`` joined
|
|||
Limbic_Region | fwiw - I am not sure I fixed Makefile.PL correctly | 23:23 | |
23:33
Qiang_ joined
|
|||
TimToady | well, left shifting @warn by '.' bits can't be right... | 23:38 | |
all you'd end up with is printing the length of @warn. | |||
pushing, rather | 23:39 | ||
hmm, I'm surprised it even parsed. | 23:40 | ||
oh, it was a print, no wonder I'm confused. | |||
nm | |||
Limbic_Region | well I knew print was wrong but I wasn't positive the intention was to push it unconditionally as there was no conditional | 23:43 | |
that's the part I am still unsure of | |||
TimToady | it's inside an "if ($whichparrot)" conditional | 23:44 | |
or rather: | 23:45 | ||
if ($ENV{PUGS_EMBED} and $ENV{PUGS_EMBED} =~ /\bparrot\b/i) { | |||
Limbic_Region | the if ($whichparrot) was further down | ||
this particular one may have already been in a conditional - as you pasted | |||
but it wasn't on my screen so it was action at a distance AFAIWC | 23:46 | ||
or influence at a distance rather | |||
*shrug* I think it is right | |||
audrey will change it if it isn't | |||
23:52
pen1 joined
23:53
Qiang joined
|