pugscode.org/ | nopaste: sial.org/pbot/perl6 | ?eval [~] <m oo se> | We do Haskell, too | > reverse . show $ foldl1 (*) [1..4] | irclog: irc.pugscode.org/ Set by diakopter on 11 July 2007. |
|||
pugs_svn | r19538 | cosimo++ | Refactored `pick' tests under /t/spec/S29-list/ | 00:14 | |
r19538 | cosimo++ | "Fudgified" :todo tests markers. | |||
cosimo | I'm marking todo tests now with "#?pugs"... | 00:15 | |
pugs_svn | r19539 | cosimo++ | No more tests here. Destroying folder. | 00:17 | |
00:20
IllvilJa left
|
|||
cosimo | Guys, I *have* to have sleep now. It's 1:20 am here. | 00:22 | |
Good night to you all. God bless Perl6. | |||
[particle] | ~~ | 00:23 | |
pugs_svn | r19540 | cosimo++ | Refactored container.cat,roundrobin tests into /t/spec/S29-container. | 00:31 | |
r19540 | cosimo++ | Fudgifying of :todo test markers. ":depends" are now explained in | |||
r19540 | cosimo++ | the test description. | |||
00:32
cspencer left
00:38
cosimo left
00:47
cosimo joined,
cosimo left
|
|||
Coke | depends? | 00:51 | |
sure, feed the bot, get nothing. ^_^ | |||
[particle] | what bot? | ||
00:53
polettix joined
00:55
REPLeffect left
00:58
nipotaway is now known as nipotan
|
|||
Coke | well, perhaps that's my problem. | 00:58 | |
01:08
cnhackTNT joined
01:21
lyokato_ joined,
devogon left
01:34
ispy_ left
01:43
explorer__ joined
01:44
explorer__ left
01:49
jferrero left
01:50
jjore left
01:51
japhb left
01:52
BinGOs left
|
|||
pugs_svn | r19541 | lwall++ | [Test] allow todo 'feature', :by<6.28> | 01:52 | |
r19541 | lwall++ | [fudge] fix bracket bug on block todo | |||
01:57
BinGOs joined
02:02
BinGOs left
02:11
alester left
02:14
japhb joined
02:15
alester joined
02:28
polettix left
02:55
jhorwitz left
|
|||
diakopter | rakudo_svn: um, work, please | 03:08 | |
03:31
ashleyb left
03:34
alester left
03:42
alester joined
03:48
jjore joined
03:49
kanru left
04:25
agentzh left
04:56
kanru joined
05:02
wknight8111 is now known as wknight-away
05:03
penk joined
05:08
orafu joined
05:40
masak joined
05:51
Auzon left
05:58
wknight-away left
06:16
Jamtech joined
06:17
alc joined
06:19
Jamtech left,
Jamtech joined
06:20
Jamtech left
06:25
chacha_chaudhry joined
06:28
iblechbot joined
06:36
kst joined
06:52
jisom joined
06:56
devogon joined
06:58
autin joined
07:02
SCalimlim joined,
BinGOs joined
07:12
iblechbot left
07:17
cnhackTNT left
07:29
alester left
07:30
thoughtpolice joined
07:43
alc left
07:54
rob_ joined
07:55
rob_ left
07:59
chacha_chaudhry left
08:08
TimToady left
08:09
cosimo joined
08:10
diakopter left
08:14
jisom left
08:31
f0rth left
08:34
Aankhen`` joined
08:43
njbartlett_ left
09:29
wknight-away joined
09:35
mj41____ left
09:42
autin left
09:54
thoughtpolice left
10:10
polettix joined
10:14
penk left
10:21
penk joined
10:39
wknight-away left
10:45
meteorjay joined
10:48
meteorjay left
10:49
meteorjay joined
10:50
cognominal_ joined
10:53
cognominal_ left
10:59
agentzh joined
11:01
iblechbot joined
11:15
njbartlett_ joined
11:18
ebassi joined
11:20
mj41 joined
11:22
Schwern joined
|
|||
pugs_svn | r19542 | ruoso++ | [smop] adding a repository for identifier constants in include/smop_identifiers.h | 11:27 | |
moritz_ | @seen fglock | 11:28 | |
lambdabot | I haven't seen fglock. | ||
pugs_svn | r19543 | ruoso++ | [smop] adding smop_identifiers reference on smop.h | 11:30 | |
11:37
nipotan is now known as nipotaway
11:39
lisppaste3 left
11:40
qmole_ left,
qmole__ left
11:42
IllvilJa joined
11:45
lyokato_ left
11:52
Casan joined
11:54
DarkWolf84 joined
11:56
lisppaste3 joined
11:59
masak left
12:05
masak joined
12:15
meppuru joined
12:22
mosno joined
12:27
Schwern left
|
|||
pugs_svn | r19544 | ruoso++ | [smop] created a new test for the stack... this test already counts on the sm0p language already being used inside the C source to help define a set of stack nodes. | 12:28 | |
12:34
iblechbot left,
Aankh|Clone joined
|
|||
pugs_svn | r19545 | ruoso++ | [smop] changing the sm0p representation inside the C code to look just like Perl 6... | 12:36 | |
12:40
renormalist joined
12:53
Aankhen`` left
12:56
qmole joined,
qmole_ joined
12:57
explorer joined
13:01
fglock joined
|
|||
fglock | @messages | 13:02 | |
lambdabot | mncharity said 17h 28m 12s ago: fyi: perl Makefile.PL kp6_mp6 "Please inform the author." error message: sial.org/pbot/29880 | ||
mncharity said 17h 26m 41s ago: I didn't run make. Oops. Never mind. Thanks. pmurias++ | |||
13:10
wknight-away joined
|
|||
pugs_svn | r19546 | ruoso++ | [smop] moving all builtin identifiers to the constant identifier repository in smop_identifiers.h. Changing every other identifier definition to a constant that points to the constant in identifiers.h. identifiers.h is included just after base.h | 13:11 | |
13:12
wknight-away is now known as wknight8111
|
|||
pugs_svn | r19547 | ruoso++ | [smop] updating the destroy sm0p code to reflect the use of the constant identifiers | 13:13 | |
13:13
pbuetow left
13:15
cmarcelo joined,
pbuetow joined
13:22
pbuetow left
13:33
pbuetow joined
13:36
pcbuetow joined
13:37
Lorn joined
13:38
Ariel_Eran joined
13:40
cognominal_ joined
13:41
pbuetow left
13:42
ispy_ joined
13:43
f0rth joined
13:50
Alias_ joined,
icwiener joined
13:58
iblechbot joined
14:04
ashleyb joined
14:11
njbartlett_ left
14:20
pcbuetow is now known as pbuetow
14:27
ashleyb left
14:31
chacha_chaudhry joined
14:40
jhorwitz joined
14:44
hanekomu joined,
go|dfish left
14:48
DarkWolf84 left
|
|||
fglock | research.microsoft.com/users/bobmoore/ # parsing algorithms, perl5 implementations | 14:51 | |
lambdabot | Title: Robert C. Moore - Natural Language Processing Group | ||
fglock | javascript.crockford.com/tdop/ # Top Down Operator Precedence, simplified Javascript impl (could be translated to mp6) | 14:53 | |
lambdabot | Title: Top Down Operator Precedence | ||
15:01
njbartlett_ joined
15:03
chris2_ joined
15:04
chris2_ is now known as chris2
15:14
pmichaud joined
15:16
alester joined
|
|||
pugs_svn | r19548 | fglock++ | [kp6-ruby] say "hello, World" | 15:16 | |
15:17
chacha_chaudhry left
|
|||
alester | The unhappiness has started: perlbuzz.com/2008/01/perl-6-on-parr...akudo.html | 15:19 | |
lambdabot | Title: Perl 6 on Parrot is now known as Rakudo - Perl Buzz, tinyurl.com/ywcc5l | ||
avar | so we can use "onion" eh? | 15:21 | |
[particle] | yep, you can use onion | ||
andy: nice response. | |||
avar | We always could actually, we eat parrot developers | ||
ruoso | you know... there's a funny comment in that post | 15:22 | |
alester | particle: I'm workin' on a doc explaining the differences. | ||
ruoso | saying that the perl6 name should be reserved from when perl5 is able to implement Perl 6 | ||
[particle] | did you ever know that you're my hero? | ||
ruoso | :P | ||
alester | I am the wind that breaks beneath your wings. | 15:23 | |
[particle] | ...then my wife *hates* you. | ||
alester | What'd I ever do to her? | 15:24 | |
[particle] | you stink, man. | ||
ruoso anxious to have a usefull version of smop to see it it gets to the radar of Perl 6 implementations... | 15:25 | ||
[particle] | ruoso: you can put it on the radar... advertise! | ||
ruoso | heh | 15:28 | |
ruoso hates advertising vaporware... I need to get at least something running before giving it a advertisement shot... | |||
15:28
mosno left
15:33
explorer left
|
|||
meppuru | hm | 15:33 | |
rakudo sounds japanese | |||
pugs_svn | r19549 | ruoso++ | [smop] adding two other native types: idconst and bytes. idconst will be used to initialize the constant identifiers to be used in sm0p and s1p. Added a test for the const identifier. | 15:34 | |
[particle] | because it is japanese | ||
rakudo.org/ | |||
lambdabot | Title: Rakudo.org: | ||
alester | ping rakudo.org | 15:35 | |
I must be the only one with rakudo.org resolving to petdance.com's IP | |||
Coke | that's not entirely surprising, since it's Andy's domain. | 15:37 | |
meppuru | ę„½å ććć© | ||
alester | You mean "your", right? | ||
meppuru | the paradise | ||
alester | o/` and we'll be rockin' the Paradise.... o/` | 15:38 | |
15:38
alester is now known as AndyAway
|
|||
Coke peers at alester's psuedo. | 15:39 | ||
"how was I supposed to know you'd be robbing your OWN HOUSE!?" | |||
15:54
bbkr__ left
|
|||
pugs_svn | r19550 | ruoso++ | [smop] In theory, we have constant identifiers already... with the help of a little script that takes the smop_identifiers.h file and generate the code to init and destroy them... | 16:17 | |
ruoso with his hands in his boot straps and ready to pull | |||
pugs_svn | r19551 | ruoso++ | [smop] adding the main smop.c file that have the smop_init and smop_destr functions... | 16:19 | |
16:20
jferrero joined
|
|||
ruoso | fglock, I think I'll need help on the sm0p part... to create an emitter for that... | 16:20 | |
and I still need some idea on the best way of putting a preprocessor before cpp | 16:21 | ||
16:22
rdice joined
|
|||
fglock | ok but coffee | 16:23 | |
ruoso | coffe.HOW | 16:24 | |
16:25
Bzek joined,
jferrero left,
Bzek left
16:32
hanekomu left
16:35
Alias_ left
16:37
penk left
16:58
TimToady joined
17:19
masak left
17:20
hanekomu joined
17:24
TJCRI joined
17:27
jjore left
17:33
penk joined
17:34
hanekomu left
17:41
meppuru left
17:43
meppuru joined
17:44
cosimo left
17:51
kanru left
17:52
beppu joined
17:54
pmurias joined
17:55
kanru joined
|
|||
ruoso | It's weird to realise that after reinventing the wheel you make it looking like someone else's | 17:57 | |
moritz_ | lol | ||
ruoso | fglock just noticed the resemblances between smop and forth, which made me realise that smop use the same technique as the older forth compilers | 17:58 | |
indirect-threading | |||
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threaded_code..._threading | |||
and even the implementation looks alike | 17:59 | ||
www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/threading/ | |||
lambdabot | Title: Index of /forth/threading | ||
ruoso | a benchmark... in the end there's a link to the code, which looks like how smop implements it... | ||
the good news is that I was worried about smop performance, but according to wikipedia, indirect threading is "Faster than byte code." | 18:00 | ||
18:09
pmurias left
18:29
ebassi left,
TJCRI left
18:30
cosimo joined
18:44
Schnueff joined
18:55
israel_ joined,
TJCRI joined
18:57
devogon left
19:01
bwisti joined
19:13
xinming_ left
19:18
jhorwitz_ joined
19:24
apple-gunkies joined
19:25
rdice left
19:30
jhorwitz left
|
|||
apple-gunkies | Hi folks. I've read through S05 and A05, and am looking at the lolcode grammar, and still don't really understand: What, precisely, is supposed to be the difference between a rule and a token? Can someone explain, please? | 19:34 | |
moritz_ | rule = token + :sigspace-modifier | 19:35 | |
so regex = without modifiers | |||
token = implied :ratchet (backtracking control) | |||
rule = :ratchet :sigspace | |||
I think that's a FAQ by now - we should put it up somewhere ;) | 19:36 | ||
19:36
baest_ left
|
|||
apple-gunkies | ok, simple then. Guess I was looking too hard for some profound difference. Thanks :) | 19:36 | |
and yes, the synopsis doesn't really spell it out | 19:37 | ||
pugs_svn | r19552 | ruoso++ | [smop] a small exercise on how to transform sm0p code into C code... sm0p2C.txt... | ||
19:38
lisppaste3 left
19:41
baest joined
|
|||
[particle] | apple-gunkies: Just as C<rx> has variants, so does the C<regex> declarator. | 19:41 | |
In particular, there are two special variants for use in grammars: | |||
C<token> and C<rule>. | |||
from S05 | |||
granted, it's halfway down, buried in =head1 Regexes are now first-class language, not strings | 19:42 | ||
pugs_svn | r19553 | ruoso++ | [smop] sm0p2C.txt: uses gcc static anonymous array in the exercise code. | ||
TimToady | most of the synopses desperately need reorganizing, but I'm afraid to break smartlinks | 19:47 | |
moritz_ | TimToady: it will not get better if you wait longer | 19:48 | |
TimToady | I need something that chases smartlinks the other direction and tells me when I've broken one. :) | ||
moritz_ | let's rephrase it: if you reorganise the spec, I'll invest some time to unbreak the smart links | ||
TimToady | that's the other approach, yeah | 19:49 | |
ruoso wonders how to create more room for optimizations in the smop stack... having to run a code like the one in sm0p2C.txt everytime entering a new stack frame... | |||
TimToady | but it's a convenient excuse when I don't want to admit having the time or energy :) | ||
ruoso: are there any Forth implementations that do continuations? | 19:50 | ||
s/any/any fast/ | 19:51 | ||
ruoso | TimToady, I don't know Forth that much... | ||
19:51
lisppaste3 joined
|
|||
TimToady | it's just like Japanese, only with a different vocabulary | 19:52 | |
well, different writing system too... | |||
19:52
fglock left
|
|||
ruoso | hmmm.. as I don't know japanese, comparing them do make sense... | 19:53 | |
:P | |||
wolverian | are there millions of implementations of japanes, or only one (or a few variants)? | ||
s/nes/nese/ | |||
TimToady | I dunno, but most of them are pretty fast implementions, faster than my brain can process | 19:54 | |
ruoso | But I'm trully concerned about the possible performance impact of the dynamic and polymorphic eval of smop | 19:55 | |
TimToady, take a look at the sm0p2C.txt file | |||
that's the code that will be run everytime... | |||
because the stack nodes are dynamic | |||
[particle] | ...every time an opcode farts? | 19:56 | |
ruoso | everytime a new recursion in the stack is needed | ||
unless some optimization is made | |||
I just need to make sure I leave room for it | |||
TimToady | where's Lisp when you need it? | ||
[particle] | (here(right)) | 19:57 | |
ruoso | at least I feel that sm0p is usefull... having to write that C code seems awful | ||
it actually *was* awful to write the exercise | |||
TimToady | You can solve any problem in computer science with another level of indirection, except for the problem of too many levels of indirection. :) | 19:59 | |
ruoso | heahahaehe | ||
indeed.. | |||
but I feel like there is some way to optimize it... | 20:00 | ||
I just can't see it clearly right now | |||
and I feel unconfortable to keep going without knowing that there's actually room to optimize it... | |||
TimToady | well, you probably need more contextual information on where continuations are guaranteed to be single-use | 20:01 | |
ruoso | I was thiking about some long-living constant copy of that structure that is then clonned in a more efficient way | ||
TimToady | but I'm not really an expert on CPS | 20:03 | |
20:03
pmurias joined
|
|||
ruoso | TimToady, CPS is not the big deal here.. | 20:03 | |
but the whole stack thing | |||
pmurias | ruoso: is it worth to have everything stackless? | ||
ruoso | pmurias, other way the C stack would bite me | ||
at some point | |||
20:04
barney joined
|
|||
ruoso | when trying to implement continuation for instance... | 20:04 | |
because I would have to mix the C stack with the Perl stack | |||
and that seems very hard to keep up | |||
pmurias | i wander about keeping the c level stackfull and the layer in bytecode in stackles | 20:06 | |
ruoso | it's hard to bootstrap the oo system that way | ||
apple-gunkies | particle: I had stepped away, thanks for following up. I had thought that regex and rule were synonymous. It all makes more sense now;) | 20:08 | |
integral | (chicken scheme does some tricks to use the C stack, yet do GC and continuations) | ||
TimToady | googling for "efficient cps continuation" gives some interesting hits | ||
cosimo | Hi all! | 20:09 | |
moritz_ | hi cosimo | 20:10 | |
cosimo | I'm sorry, I'm always breaking in with some newbie question... :-) | 20:11 | |
Even this time :) | |||
Given this code: | 20:12 | ||
if $?PUGS_BACKEND ne "BACKEND_PUGS" { | 20:13 | ||
skip_rest "PIL2JS and PIL-Run do not support eval() yet."; | |||
exit; | |||
} | |||
Is it correct to replace it with #?pugs: skip 'reason' with a block? | |||
I don't think they have the same meaning... | 20:14 | ||
moritz_ | since PIL2JS and PIL-Run are bit-rotten, you can just ignore that block | ||
20:14
thoughtpolice joined
|
|||
moritz_ | aka delete it | 20:15 | |
cosimo | thx | ||
moritz_ | in the cleaned-up version | ||
pmurias | svk-- #behaving strangly (mergin stuff which hasn't changed) | 20:16 | |
ruoso going home & | 20:17 | ||
ruoso have to take his mind in order... | |||
pugs_svn | r19554 | cosimo++ | Refactored eval tests, moved under t/spec/S29-context/ | 20:19 | |
r19554 | cosimo++ | Ignored old PIL2JS/PIL2Run backends notice, they are no more used, it seems. | |||
r19555 | cosimo++ | Refactored 'defined' builtin tests, moved under t/spec/S29-scalar | 20:22 | ||
20:24
pmurias left
|
|||
pugs_svn | r19556 | cosimo++ | Refactored 'die' builtin tests, moved under t/spec/S29-context | 20:24 | |
r19557 | cosimo++ | Refactored 'die' builtin tests, moved under t/spec/S29-context | 20:25 | ||
20:27
diakopter joined
20:30
ChanServ sets mode: +o diakopter,
diakopter sets mode: +o TimToady,
diakopter sets mode: -o diakopter
20:35
cosimo left
20:38
cosimo joined
20:40
TJCRI left
20:42
TJCRI joined
20:44
Aankh|Clone left
20:46
apple-gunkies left
20:59
chris2 left
|
|||
pugs_svn | r19558 | cosimo++ | Refactored evalfile tests under t/spec/S29-context | 21:20 | |
21:31
barney left
21:32
AndyAway is now known as alester
|
|||
cosimo | Are these tests relevant anymore? perlsix.org/svn/pugs/view/t/builtin...it-in-if.t | 21:33 | |
lambdabot | Title: view: /pugs/t/builtins/control_flow/exit-in-if.t (Rev: HEAD, via SVN::Web), tinyurl.com/2ohtud | ||
cosimo | perlsix.org/svn/pugs/view/t/builtin...low/exit.t | ||
lambdabot | Title: view: /pugs/t/builtins/control_flow/exit.t (Rev: HEAD, via SVN::Web) | ||
moritz_ | looking... | ||
I seen no reason why they shouldn't be relevant | 21:34 | ||
look like old pugs regressions, but other implementations might run into the same errors | |||
cosimo | They seem to be about PIL2JS | ||
moritz_ | but they test valid perl 6 | 21:35 | |
cosimo | ok! | ||
21:36
israel_ left
21:39
Coke left
|
|||
pmichaud | I've been thinking that specific compiler regressions could go into a regressions.t | 21:40 | |
it would still get run by all implementations, but might make the test organizations a bit easier | 21:41 | ||
pugs_svn | r19559 | cosimo++ | Refactored exit and nothing tests into t/spec/S29-context | ||
21:41
Lorn left
|
|||
cosimo | pmichaud: by implementation you mean pugs, rakudo, and such..? | 21:42 | |
21:42
jhorwitz__ joined
|
|||
pmichaud | cosimo: yes | 21:42 | |
21:42
jhorwitz__ is now known as jhorwitz
|
|||
[particle] | as in, t/spec/S29-misc/regressions.t ?? | 21:43 | |
pmichaud | well, it could even be t/spec/S29-context/regressions.t | ||
[particle] | ok, sure | ||
pmichaud | it depends a bit on the test... if it looks 'funny' with respect to the other tests, then perhaps it belongs in regressions.t | 21:44 | |
Andy++ # "you can't declare a de facto standard" | 21:47 | ||
alester | Heh, thanks. | ||
pmichaud | that's a wonderful comment/insight | ||
meppuru | good night | 21:48 | |
21:49
meppuru left
21:53
rdice joined
|
|||
pmichaud | afk -- heading home | 21:53 | |
alester | pmichaud: Seriously. | ||
We could say "This is the official Perl 6", but everyone's free to ignore it. | |||
pugs_svn | r19560 | cosimo++ | Refactored time-related function tests into t/spec/S29-time/ | 21:55 | |
21:57
ispy_ left
21:58
jhorwitz_ left
|
|||
pugs_svn | r19561 | cosimo++ | Fudge-ified :todo tests | 22:00 | |
r19562 | moritz++ | Test suite refactoring: | |||
r19562 | moritz++ | * move ignorecase regex modifier tests to t/spec/S05-modifier/* | |||
r19562 | moritz++ | (still need more tests here) | |||
r19562 | moritz++ | * small correctiion in t/builtins/math/log.t | |||
r19563 | cosimo++ | Added all t/builtins/hashes/exists.t tests to existing | 22:04 | ||
r19563 | cosimo++ | spec/S29-hash exist tests. | |||
[particle] | (test refactoring)++ | 22:05 | |
pugs_svn | r19564 | cosimo++ | Refactored and merged existing hash.delete() tests | 22:07 | |
r19564 | cosimo++ | with spec/S29-hash/delete.t tests | |||
22:08
alester is now known as AndyAway,
IllvilJa left
|
|||
pugs_svn | r19565 | cosimo++ | Moved system() test script under t/spec/S29-os/ | 22:10 | |
r19566 | moritz++ | moved :basechar tests to t/spec/S05-modifier/basechar.t | 22:14 | ||
r19567 | cosimo++ | Refactored isa hash tests into t/spec/S29-hash/ | |||
22:14
devogon joined
|
|||
pugs_svn | r19568 | moritz++ | test for repetition modifier under t/spec/ | 22:19 | |
22:21
iblechbot left
22:22
Auzon joined
|
|||
pugs_svn | r19569 | moritz++ | moved tests for the :continue regex modifier | 22:22 | |
[particle] | i like that this test refactoring means nobody's tests will work right until utils/fudge is ready :) | 22:24 | |
22:24
apple-gunkies joined
|
|||
cosimo | :-) | 22:25 | |
moritz_ | [particle]: I thought it already handles the simple cases? | ||
[particle] | moritz_: it did, until everything changed | ||
so now it doesn't handle any cases | |||
i mean, no implementation handles #?<impl>: todo | 22:26 | ||
moritz_ | but fudge does the for the implementation, doesn't it? | ||
of course it's not yet integrated into the "make smoke" thingy | |||
[particle] | never tried it | ||
i've been meaning to, but too few cycles | 22:27 | ||
cosimo | [particle]: maybe I should change {#?<impl>: todo} with {#?<impl>: todo ''} ? | ||
[particle] | cosimo: i don't think that'll matter | 22:28 | |
in any case, rakudo hasn't been tested with fudge | |||
larry may have tested pugs, iunno | |||
22:31
jjore joined
|
|||
moritz_ | a small question of spec interpretation: my $s = "aB "; $s =~ s:ii/.*/abcd/; should $s now be "aBcd" or "aBcD"? | 22:36 | |
22:37
cmarcelo left
|
|||
moritz_ | so if the last matched char has no case information, is the rest of the substition string left unchanged? | 22:37 | |
22:39
TJCRI left
|
|||
[particle] | i'd hope the rest is left unchanged. | 22:40 | |
moritz_ | ok | ||
pugs_svn | r19570 | moritz++ | Added tests for the :ii modifier | 22:45 | |
cosimo | and good night #perl6 | 22:47 | |
moritz_ | good night cosimo ;) | ||
Auzon | gnight! | ||
22:48
cosimo left
22:52
jhorwitz left,
skids left
22:56
Schnueff left
|
|||
pugs_svn | r19571 | moritz++ | tests for the "smart" :ii modifier | 22:56 | |
23:03
_sprocket_ joined,
pack joined
23:04
pack left
23:05
cognominal_ left
23:21
icwiener left
23:22
rdice left
23:49
skids joined
23:54
atobey joined,
Limbic_Region joined
|
|||
mncharity | perl script/kp6 -Cruby -e 'say "hello, world!"' :) fglock++ | 23:57 |