pugscode.org/ | nopaste: sial.org/pbot/perl6 | pugs: [~] <m oo se> (or rakudo:, kp6:, smop: etc.) || We do Haskell, too | > reverse . show $ foldl1 (*) [1..4] | irclog: irc.pugscode.org/
Set by TimToady on 25 January 2008.
00:10 ruz joined 00:22 sri_work left 00:23 simcop2387 left 00:26 simcop2387 joined
pugs_svn r19697 | cosimo++ | [t] Test suite refactoring. 00:30
r19697 | cosimo++ | Moved sign-sqrt math functions under t/spec/S29-num
r19697 | cosimo++ | Applied slight fugdeification of pod sections and
r19697 | cosimo++ | removed redundant main::is_approx() test function.
00:32 justatheory left
cosimo_ almost all existing S29 tests are now moved to t/spec ... 00:32
00:32 justatheory joined
TimToady yay! 00:34
cosimo_ of course, more tests are needed to cover all of S29, ... :-) 00:35
TimToady I need to convince someone to make a specsmoke target for rakudo... 00:36
cosimo_ would be useful 00:37
TimToady I think we should probably have 40,000 tests by the time 6.0 comes out
cosimo_ 40k is a looong way, but adding 1 test is 1 less to go. :-) 00:39
TimToady well, I'd be happy if anything ran all the tests we have now :) 00:41
(except for the incorrect ones, of course :)
cosimo_ I was trying yesterday to run single test scripts 00:42
TimToady using prove6?
cosimo_ ehm
no
manually with t/harness 00:43
TimToady main problem with prove6 is I think it has to run in top-level dir
but maybe that has been fixed 00:44
oh, t/harness is parrotland
cosimo_ yes, maybe it's not the proper way of doing 00:45
TimToady perhaps t/harness should be taught about fudge
cosimo_ is it possible to run prove6 without pugs? 00:46
TimToady oh, perl6/t/harness is already taught
looks like you have to use --fudge
cosimo_ yep, sorry I was referring to parrot/languages/perl6/t/harness
TimToady I mostly just "make spectest" or run the *.rakudo file directly 00:47
cosimo_ spectest doesn't work on win32. I hadn't yet time to look at that. 00:48
One of the things I want to do is 00:50
to try to run single tests (ex.: S29-trig/e.t) which currently fail for me
and try to implement/fix the missing/broken functions. 00:51
I'd like to learn more about parrot and perl6 grammar/pir
TimToady I noticed that rakudo doesn't seem to do eval yet, through try seems to work most of the time
todo() required two arguments till earlier today, and fudge only gives the reason argument 00:52
since it marks each test individually
and it looks like the only way to have default arguments is via multi 00:53
cosimo_ can now properly do a 'make spectest'...
00:56 njbartlett left
cosimo_ Is #?rakudo todo 'notimplemented' a correct syntax? Probably I should use skip? 01:00
01:01 devogon left
TimToady todo should work now, as long as you have the most recent Test.pm 01:04
if it blows up the parse, use skip
since eval doesn't work yet
try works at least some of the time, but doesn't help with parsefails 01:05
meppl good night 01:09
01:10 njbartlett joined
cosimo_ meppl: night 01:10
meppl ;) 01:14
cosimo_ TimToady: would you mind looking at a fudge "patch"? seems to correct the 'todo' problem I've seen 01:16
This one -> nopaste.ch/0a4ccce41a6efab.html 01:18
or probably I have totally missed the point... :-) 01:19
TimToady the point of the if is that there might be a sequence of tests interspersed with non-test statements, and we only want to mark the test statements, which are recognized by putting is/ok/etc at the beginning of the line 01:23
cosimo_ mmh, let me recheck. I'm trying with S29-str\index.t 01:24
TimToady looks like it's working okay to me 01:25
01:26 meppl left
cosimo_ works for me, even though vim doesn't understand `;#' without spaces 01:27
you mean that it works, but with or without the change? 01:28
TimToady I mean fudge looks like it's doing the right thing. my perl6 blows up on the first index call 01:29
without the change
the correct 2 tests are commented out 01:30
so the $IS is recognizing the "is" on each line
suppose some test had "say '# comment'" in between those lines. It would mark the say rather than the 2nd is with your change 01:32
cosimo_ I'm too tired to go on, of course... :-) Going to sleep. Thanks for your support! 01:34
TimToady night!
cosimo_ Tomorrow is another day!
01:35 japhb joined 01:37 cosimo_ left 02:05 dlocaus joined
dlocaus . 02:05
02:05 dlocaus left
TimToady decommuting & 02:11
02:11 thestarslookdown joined 02:34 Auzon joined 03:00 _newbie_ joined, _newbie_ left 03:01 jeffreykegler joined 03:04 jeffreykegler left 03:09 Limbic_Region left 03:19 thestarslookdown left 03:34 wtgee joined 03:52 Kattana left 04:11 SubStack joined, chacha_chaudhry joined 04:12 chaoslawful joined 04:13 chaoslawful left 04:14 chaoslawful joined 04:47 mncharity joined 04:54 wtgee left
mncharity late night rehi. btw, if anyone would like to bang on the ruby backend, you would be most welcome. rather non-Ofun to work solo. 04:58
05:02 Ashizawa joined 05:14 Ashizawa_ joined 05:18 Ashizawa_ left
pugs_svn r19698 | putter++ | [kp6] ruby backend: Emit/Ruby5Regex.pm created, copied from Emit/Perl5Regex.pm. 05:23
05:25 Ashizawa_ joined
pugs_svn r19699 | putter++ | [kp6] fix name: Ruby5Regex.pm -> Emit/RubyRegex.pm 05:27
05:29 thestarslookdown joined 05:35 Ashizawa left 05:46 chaoslawful left 06:04 manfred_ joined 06:07 jjore joined 06:11 thestarslookdown left
mncharity I'm puzzling over kp6's regex support. It looks like main options are Visitor/Token.pm and Visitor/Emit/Perl5Regex.pm. Yes? Or have I missed something? The first appears to be used (script/kp6) by default, but lacks the emit_foo support for alternate backends which the second provides. 06:12
They both seem an easy transliteration. They seem to implement a very simple subset of regex? Which should I be using? Are both believe to support parsing of kp6? Is either the focus of future development? 06:15
avar they both work, Token is the p6 one and p5rx uses the p5 engine
mncharity I'm a bit surprised by how minimal the regex engine implementations seem to be... ^.^ 06:18
avar: ah, ok. let's see..
hmm, so if Token is just another p6 part of kp6, why am I getting 'emit_ruby not found for Token' errors in -Cruby? 06:21
06:27 cspencer joined
Auzon pugs: 10 % 2 06:28
exp_evalbot RESULT[0]
Auzon pugs: 5.5 % 1 06:29
exp_evalbot RESULT[1/2]
Auzon cute.
06:31 manfred_ left
mncharity Ok. I thought my task for tonight was going to be starting support for Token. But it sounds like that should not be necessary. That Token should *just work* by default. In which case I note it doesn't. script/kp6 -Cruby 'grammar A{token b{c}};' fails with Can't locate object method "emit_ruby" via package "Token" at compiled/perl5-kp6-mp6/lib/KindaPerl6/Visitor/Emit/Ruby.pm line 298. 06:36
but -Cperl5 works, suggesting there's an implicit emit_perl5 somewhere? 06:37
06:38 Ashizawa joined
mncharity An Emit/RubyRegexp might be higher performance than using Token.pm. But the current objective is 'get to bootstrap as soon as possible', so if Token.pm should be working, then a RubyRegexp is a task for post-bootstrap. 06:40
06:41 Ashizawa left, Ashizawa_ left
mncharity avar: regards your earlier comments about Pad and common backend code, perhaps there are really two flavors of bootstrap. Compiler bootstrap, where p6 code becomes able to parse itself, generate an ast, and emit to a runtime *not* included in the bootstrap. And a runtime bootstrap, where the runtime is mostly implemented in p6, with a very small non-p6 footprint. 06:44
Pad and the common backend code would be the latter? Does that make sense?
06:45 pen1 left 06:52 chacha_chaudhry left 06:53 cspencer left 07:00 devogon joined
mncharity ah well. I'm going to punt for the evening, pending clarification from kp6 folks. Which may seem rather odd. But I've been defining my scope to exclude kp6 stuff as much as possible, delegating such work, in part as a reality check on there being people who care about any of this. 07:01
Faster kp6 doesn't matter if kp6 isn't critical path to getting p6. Creating a ruby backend may simply not make sense. Hacking time, like life, is precious and limited. With things like OLPC where it can have a clear and immediate impact on peoples' lives. So if anyone doesn't think this a useful exercise, please, I'd appreciate hearing about it. Repeatedly. :) 07:07
g'night all :) & 07:08
Auzon night ;0
;)
mncharity lol 07:10
07:10 mncharity left 07:34 manfred joined 07:42 Khisanth left 07:56 lyokato_ joined 07:57 Khisanth joined 08:03 Aankhen`` joined 08:41 meppuru joined 09:06 iblechbot joined 09:08 pmurias joined 09:36 zf8 joined, zf8 left
pugs_svn r19700 | pmurias++ | [kp6-ruby] added Token to the default visitor sequence 09:41
09:57 iblechbot left 10:01 ludan left 10:05 zf8 joined, zf8 left 10:11 rindolf joined 10:15 mj41__ joined 10:22 jwest- joined 10:24 blindfish joined 10:25 barney joined 10:34 mj41 left 10:58 iblechbot joined 11:18 manfred left 11:32 jjore left 11:34 blindfish left 11:43 chris2_ joined 11:45 ruoso joined, manfred joined 11:46 chris2_ is now known as chris2 12:01 rindolf left 12:13 manfred left 12:17 cosimo_ joined 12:20 ispy_ joined 12:31 zf8 joined, zf8 left
spinclad @tell mncharity debian doesn't seem to have ruby 1.9 at all, only 1.8 (at least on etch, lenny, sid). how stable is 1.9 these days? -- it sounds like it was full of bleeding edges in redsix times. 12:33
lambdabot Consider it noted.
pugs_svn r19701 | cosimo++ | [t] Test suite refactoring. 12:37
r19701 | cosimo++ | Moved undef,undefine tests under t/spec/S29-scalar
r19702 | cosimo++ | [t] Test suite: refactored some operators/numify.t tests 12:38
r19702 | cosimo++ | under S29-num/int.t
12:42 jovs joined, jovs left
pugs_svn r19703 | cosimo++ | [t] Refactored cmp tests under t/spec/S29-any 12:47
r19704 | cosimo++ | Fixed typos 12:49
12:49 lyokato_ left
agentzh cosimo_: thanks for your work on test suite refactoring :) 12:51
cosimo_ agentzh: my pleasure. I'm doing that to get involved in the project and learn along the way 12:55
agentzh cosimo_: i used to do exactly the same thing one and a half year ago for exactly the same reason ;) 12:56
cosimo_: then i got distracted to work on smartlinks.pl and other things ;) 12:57
cosimo_ I'm happy to think that this is *also* a way to speed up perl6 1.0 release :-) 12:58
I meant: I *like* to think
agentzh *nod*
cosimo_ Not that it is true, of course... 12:59
:-)
agentzh in fact it *is* ;)
one of the biggest problems i was facing was how to verify the newly added tests. 13:01
in those days, audreyt was very responsive and can hack in features so that i can test the tests by "running" them ;)
*could
13:11 manfred joined 13:16 bphillip2 joined 13:21 frodo72 joined, frodo72 is now known as poletti 13:22 riffraff joined
riffraff hi 13:23
13:23 poletti left 13:24 njbartlett left, frodo72 joined 13:25 frodo72 is now known as poletti
cosimo_ hi! 13:26
moritz_ good localtime() all 13:27
pmurias hi
13:31 poletti is now known as polettix 13:32 bphillip1 left 13:37 polettix left 13:38 polettix joined 13:39 cosimo_ left, rindolf joined 13:42 polettix left 13:43 cosimo_ joined, polettix joined 13:52 cosimo_ left 13:54 IllvilJa left 14:06 [particle] left 14:25 drrho joined 14:35 araujo left 14:50 manfred left 14:51 meppuru left 14:53 meppuru joined 14:56 meppuru left 15:00 meppuru joined 15:03 jwest- left 15:14 sri_work joined 15:16 cspencer joined 15:24 rindolf left 15:36 jferrero left 16:02 meppuru left 16:03 meppuru joined 16:05 riffraff left 16:11 manfred joined 16:22 xinming_ joined 16:30 barney left 16:31 cspencer left 16:32 polettix left 16:37 cspencer joined 16:39 xinming left 16:56 cspencer left
cj hihi 17:00
pmurias: hi ho 17:01
if I wanted to make a kp6 IL emitter, what should I get familiar with? the p5 emitter, probably... but I tried reading the p5 emitter, and I was very confused :) 17:02
17:23 wtgee joined 17:27 njbartlett joined 17:42 meppel-san joined 17:57 zf8 joined, zf8 left 17:59 cmarcelo joined 18:00 meppuru left 18:02 sri_work left, sri_work joined 18:03 meppel-san is now known as meppl 18:23 iblechbot left 18:33 pmurias left 18:35 pmurias joined 18:39 jjore joined 18:41 Woody4286 joined 18:42 meteorjay left 18:48 Limbic_Region joined 18:49 meteorjay joined, simcop2387 left 18:50 simcop2387 joined 18:52 simcop2387 left 18:53 simcop2387 joined 19:09 renormalist joined 19:15 drrho left 19:22 iblechbot joined 19:28 IllvilJa joined 19:42 thoughtpolice joined 19:56 cspencer joined 20:05 cspencer_ joined 20:09 IllvilJa left
cj does anyone have docs on the code in this directory? 20:12
svn.pugscode.org/pugs/v6/v6-KindaPe...itor/Emit/
lambdabot Title: Revision 19704: /v6/v6-KindaPerl6/src/KindaPerl6/Visitor/Emit, tinyurl.com/ynqqq3
20:15 cspencer left 20:22 manfred left 20:23 IllvilJa joined 20:24 chris2 left 20:32 chris2 joined 20:41 araujo joined 21:07 BinGOs left 21:12 BinGOs joined
pmurias cj: docs/ruby_backend.txt 21:15
21:19 Aankhen`` left
pmurias cj: if you have any questions ask 21:23
pugs_svn r19705 | cosimo++ | [t] Test suite refactoring 21:34
r19705 | cosimo++ | Moved pugs-specific system() tests under t/spec/S29-os
r19705 | cosimo++ | Most likely these tests are not relevant (or might be
r19705 | cosimo++ | modified for rakudo)...
cj pmurias: what is AST, and are there any docs on it? 21:35
pugs_svn r19706 | cosimo++ | [t] Test suite: refactored `eqv' tests under S29-any/eqv.t 21:40
21:43 cspencer_ left 21:45 DarkWolf84 joined
pmurias cj: src/KindaPerl6/Ast.pm 21:58
you can try script/kp6 -Cast on a piece of code to see what it compiles to
22:00 ofer0 is now known as ofer, cosimo_ joined
cosimo_ hi there! 22:04
22:08 cspencer_ joined 22:11 kst joined 22:12 cspencer_ left
pmurias cosimo_: hi 22:16
22:17 jferrero joined
pmurias cj: AST is Abstract Syntax Tree, the representation of code as a data structure 22:18
pugs_svn r19707 | cosimo++ | [t] Test suite refactoring. 22:26
r19707 | cosimo++ | Moved builtins/type_declarations.t under t/spec/S29-type.
r19707 | cosimo++ | Don't know if it's really correct, but we can change it later.
22:37 pmurias left 22:59 meppl left 23:00 meppl joined 23:03 chris2 left 23:25 iblechbot left 23:38 cosimo_ left 23:40 cosimo_ joined 23:43 kingkongrevenge joined 23:44 ofer left
cj hurm... anyone know what my svn username is? /me checks the AUTHORS file log 23:50
23:56 cosimo_ left

Powered by Cro and the Raku® Programming Language.

Please report any issues / comments / feature requests as an issue on App::Raku::Log.

Thank you!