»ö« | perl6-projects.org/ | nopaste: paste.lisp.org/new/perl6 | evalbot: perl6: say 3;' | irclog: irc.pugscode.org/ | UTF-8 is our friend! Set by moritz_ on 27 June 2009. |
|||
00:04
beggars joined,
kane_ left
00:11
redicaps left,
justatheory joined
00:13
payload left
00:16
cdarroch left
00:25
frew_ left
00:27
fridim_ left
00:28
AnTriber joined
00:34
payload joined
00:37
AnTriber left
00:43
justatheory left
01:07
egypt joined
01:10
orafu left,
orafu joined
01:13
lumi__ joined
01:14
Limbic_Region left
01:17
molaf_x joined
01:20
hercynium joined
|
|||
tann | rakudo: my @a = 1..10; say @a[5..*].perl; | 01:21 | |
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«[6, 7, 8, 9, 10, undef]» | ||
01:22
colomon joined
|
|||
egypt | why the undef? | 01:22 | |
tann | egypt: methinks, it's a bug | 01:23 | |
rakudo's bug that is | |||
pugs: my @a = 1..10; say @a[5..*].perl; | 01:24 | ||
p6eval | pugs: OUTPUT«(6, 7, 8, 9, 10)» | ||
01:26
Whiteknight left
|
|||
araujo wonders what '.perl' does | 01:26 | ||
sjohnson | araujo: it's like Data::Dumper in P5 | 01:27 | |
tann | sraujo: stringifies the content of the object | ||
araujo | oooh | ||
nice | |||
tann | so you can eval it back in | ||
TimToady | like .repr in python, except we think there's more than one possible representation :) | 01:28 | |
araujo | aah I see :) | ||
and so, i guess all the valid representations can be eval'ed too? | 01:29 | ||
tann | theorectically yes :) | ||
TimToady | it is not guaranteed :) | ||
araujo | hah ok | ||
TimToady | or we'd have to write test cases for python, ruby, lisp, bf, tcl, etc. :) | 01:30 | |
tann | test cases for p6's subscripts already make one go insane :D | 01:31 | |
01:34
lumi_ left
|
|||
tann | TimToady: so, which syn/how can i do my $x = \$y; $$x = 1 like in p5? | 01:34 | |
01:34
molaf_xx left
|
|||
TimToady | why do you need the indirection? | 01:35 | |
tann | TimToady: porting p5 modules to p6 | ||
TimToady | why did the module need the indirection? | 01:36 | |
tann | it's Benchmark.pm and the guys does crazy referenences in that code | ||
and i'm too lazy or trying to change as little as possible :D | |||
TimToady | short answer is using Captures | 01:37 | |
tann | long answer is rewriting that portion of code then? :) | ||
TimToady | which S08 will theoretically be about | ||
tann | s08 isn't on perlcal, is it? | 01:38 | |
TimToady | but basically you're talking about a list of one element, one way or another | ||
some container that happens to hold only one element | 01:39 | ||
you can do it with a Capture, but it's different from P5 in that it automatically derefs it for you | 01:40 | ||
the most general container may end up being something called a Parcel though | |||
hasn't hit the spec yet though | |||
01:41
r0bby left
|
|||
tann | oh...this is nice....p6 has <-> !!! :) | 01:42 | |
TimToady | and, of course, you can always define an object that contains a single attribute | 01:43 | |
01:46
awwaiid left
|
|||
TimToady | you can blame the persistence of Juerd++ for <-> | 01:47 | |
tann | i'm thankful for it ! :) | 01:48 | |
rakudo: my @a = 1..5; for @a <-> $i { $i **= 2 }; say @a.perl; | 01:49 | ||
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«[1, 4, 9, 16, 25]» | ||
pmichaud_ | aiiigh! | 01:50 | |
tann | hola | ||
pmichaud_ | rakudo: my @a = 1..5; @a = @a >>**>> 2; say @a.perl; # I like this one | ||
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«[1, 4, 9, 16, 25]» | ||
Juerd_ | No >>**>>= operator then? ;) | ||
pmichaud_ | NYI in rakudo, I suspect | 01:51 | |
(I don't know that it's valid anyway) | |||
and it'd probably be >>**=>> | |||
std: (1,2) >>**=>> 2 | |||
Juerd_ | I can't wrap my head around how and when to use >> and << anyway | ||
p6eval | std 27720: OUTPUT«ok 00:02 37m» | ||
pmichaud_ | the fat part of the arrows always point to the array | ||
Juerd_ | Why is there a second one? | ||
TimToady | in case there are two arrays | 01:52 | |
pmichaud_ | to distinguish it from @a >>**<< @b | ||
Juerd_ | What would @a >>* 2 do? | ||
TimToady | std: @a >>* 2 | ||
p6eval | std 27720: OUTPUT«##### PARSE FAILED #####Preceding operator expects term, but found infix > instead at /tmp/qnwkpY6pf0 line 1:------> @a >>*⏏ 2 expecting infix_circumfix_meta_operator__S_291LtLt_GtGtOther potential difficulties: Variable @a is not predeclared at | ||
../tmp/qnw… | |||
Juerd_ | Be invalid. Okay :) | ||
pmichaud_ | that's not the most awesome error I can imagine for that... but it's workable :-) | ||
Juerd_ | "" is wonderful. Never knew it existed. | ||
TimToady | yeah, parsed it as @a > > | 01:53 | |
Juerd_ | I'm off to bed (localtime = 3:53 am) | 01:54 | |
pmichaud_ | actually, that's not what the error shows | ||
Juerd_ | Good night :) | ||
pmichaud_ | it parsed it as @a >> * > | ||
I mean | |||
@a >> * | |||
lambdabot | Maybe you meant: activity activity-full admin all-dicts arr ask . ? @ v | ||
pmichaud_ | or | ||
hmmm. | |||
tann | rakudo: my @a = 1..5; say @a[@a.end +> 1 .. *].perl | ||
pmichaud_ | maybe the position is just off. The marker came back as being after the * | ||
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«[3, 4, 5, undef]» | 01:55 | |
TimToady | std: @a >> 42 | ||
tann | pmichaud: is there a rt for this ^^? | ||
p6eval | std 27720: OUTPUT«##### PARSE FAILED #####Obsolete use of >> to do right shift; in Perl 6 please use +> or ~> instead at /tmp/WeQIi9olBB line 1:------> @a >> ⏏42Other potential difficulties: Variable @a is not predeclared at /tmp/WeQIi9olBB line 1:------> @a⏏ | ||
..… | |||
TimToady | hmm | ||
std: @a >>42 | |||
p6eval | std 27720: OUTPUT«##### PARSE FAILED #####Preceding operator expects term, but found infix > instead at /tmp/XOR9BRZAMz line 1:------> @a >>⏏42 expecting any of: infix or meta-infix infix stopper standard stopper terminatorOther potential difficulties: | ||
..Variable @a is … | |||
pmichaud_ | tann: you mean about [1..*] going off the end of the array? I think there's an rt for it, yes. | ||
TimToady | curious | ||
pmichaud_ | TimToady: perhaps it parsed forward, then backtracked? | 01:56 | |
TimToady | std: @a >>|| 42 | ||
p6eval | std 27720: OUTPUT«##### PARSE FAILED #####Preceding operator expects term, but found infix > instead at /tmp/HWAt0rBMCW line 1:------> @a >>||⏏ 42 expecting infix_circumfix_meta_operator__S_291LtLt_GtGtOther potential difficulties: Variable @a is not predeclared at | ||
../tmp/H… | |||
TimToady | something like that | ||
but it ought to have reset the high-water mark somewhere | 01:57 | ||
pmichaud_ | yup. | ||
TimToady | std: @a »* 42 | 01:58 | |
p6eval | std 27720: OUTPUT«##### PARSE FAILED #####Syntax error (two terms in a row?) at /tmp/NbbJIXLbHW line 1:------> @a »*⏏ 42 expecting infix_circumfix_meta_operator__S_290Fre_NchOther potential difficulties: Variable @a is not predeclared at /tmp/NbbJIXLbHW line 1:------> | ||
..[… | |||
TimToady | there are still times when it really ought to just say "I'm really confused here" | 01:59 | |
pmichaud_ | "Oops." | ||
But yes, I'd like a compiler that says "I'm confused." | 02:00 | ||
That's so much nicer than "You're wrong." | |||
02:01
Jedai left
02:02
dukeleto joined
|
|||
dukeleto | howdy | 02:03 | |
TimToady | greetin's | ||
dukeleto | is there an equivalent to "use integer;" in perl 6/rakudo? | ||
TimToady | not currently | 02:04 | |
at the moment you'd declare your variables with 'int' type to do something similar | |||
a little harder, but less likely to get you into accidental trouble | 02:05 | ||
pmichaud_ | (and rakudo doesn't support that yet) | ||
dukeleto: what effect would you expect "use integer" to have? | |||
i.e., what are you wanting to see from it? | 02:06 | ||
dukeleto | i wanted to speed up sqrt($n) when $n is an int, but I guess declaring my Int $n; does the trick, correct? | ||
pmichaud_ | if $n is an Int, then multidispatch should already go for the faster sqrt() | 02:07 | |
(not that I know how/why it would be faster, though.) | |||
dukeleto | that is good. I have a small group of people working on the euler_bench project, which aims to write the Euler Project problems in various languages to benchmark them. We are starting with perl 5 and rakudo :) | 02:08 | |
pmichaud_ | ah, yes. Keep in mind that at the moment Rakudo doesn't offer a lot of optimization options. | ||
while it seems like having a typed variable would make things faster -- in Rakudo it actually will tend to slow things down slightly (because of the need to check the types) | 02:09 | ||
eventually when we have some type-based optimizations in place, that probably won't be the case. | |||
dukeleto | good to know | ||
euler bench lives at github.com/notbenh/euler_bench/tree/master | |||
pmichaud_ | it would be interesting to test both typed and untyped variables :-) | 02:10 | |
02:10
rbuels joined
|
|||
tann | substr no longer does replacement? | 02:11 | |
sjohnson | Perl 5: www.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_...-camel.jpg | ||
Perl 6: eppy7890.files.wordpress.com/2009/0..._camel.jpg | |||
pmichaud_ | tann: nyi | 02:12 | |
dukeleto | pmichaud: we will test both typed and untyped variables | ||
pmichaud: are there any other things that you would like to see benchmarked? | |||
pmichaud_ | I'm sure I'll think of them as I see more :-) | ||
jnthn++ undoubtedly has some ideas | |||
02:14
tann left
|
|||
pmichaud_ | sjohnson: so, Perl 6 is harmful to your health and requires a surgeon general's warning? 1/2 :-) | 02:17 | |
sjohnson | i was thinkin, Perl 6 is more badass | 02:18 | |
pmichaud_ | It's definitely cool. But I still think that Perl 5 is really cool too. | ||
sjohnson | the Perl 5 camel looks like a wimp compared to the smoking Camel | ||
02:18
colomon left
|
|||
pmichaud_ | Perl 5 ain't no wimp. | 02:18 | |
sjohnson | yeah I use Perl 5 at work everyday | ||
i just meant the pictures | |||
not the language | 02:19 | ||
pmichaud_ | yes, I know. | ||
sjohnson | i just realized the truth of using split regex's in Perl 5 | ||
today was a happy day for me | |||
can get stuff done so much quicker than PHP | |||
@lines = split / +/ => $str; | |||
lambdabot | Unknown command, try @list | ||
sjohnson | oopsies | 02:20 | |
confused the bot | |||
02:22
rbuels is now known as biorobot
|
|||
sjohnson is going to perl jail | 02:22 | ||
02:22
biorobot is now known as rbuels
|
|||
wayland76 | sjohnson: Yes, that should've been @lines = split /\s+/, $str; | 02:25 | |
:) | |||
Because that picks up tabs too | |||
sjohnson | right! | ||
dukeleto | pmichaud: does rakudo need things from parrot to implement type-based optimizations ? | 02:26 | |
wayland76 | And if you had $_ = $str, you could do @lines = split; | ||
pmichaud_ | dukeleto: Don't know yet (more) | ||
sjohnson | wayland76: what will that split though, newlines? | ||
pmichaud_ | dukeleto: type-based optimizations aren't high on our priority list at the moment -- we're still more focused on feature completeness and removing "not yet implemented" failures | ||
wayland76: I just pushed some more build/install changes into the ins2 branch | 02:28 | ||
dukeleto | pmichaud: I understand that, but I am more interested in highlighting what needs to be optimized in Parrot by blatantly pointing it out with Rakudo code :) | ||
pmichaud_ | (including a couple of things you posted in your patch) | ||
wayland76 | sjohnson: Not sure, but I think p5 split defaults to /\s+/ | ||
pmichaud_ | dukeleto: then benchmarks will help. So will profiling. | ||
wayland76 | pmichaud_: Good to hear. rurban seems to be keen on getting that sort of thing to work on Windows | 02:29 | |
pmichaud_ | wayland76: I didn't add the *.spec files from your patch yet | ||
next time you send a patch -- can you do it against the ins2 branch instead of the trunk, though? | |||
It was hard to tease out your changes from the ones I had already made | |||
wayland76 | pmichaud_: That's fine (re spec file). Hmm. Sorry I wasn't around; I think git would've let me regenerate the patch against ins2 easily | 02:30 | |
sjohnson | wayland76: ok | ||
pmichaud_ | no problem, I learned some git-fu as a result :-) | ||
wayland76 | pmichaud_: Actually, couldn't you just patch HEAD, and then do "git diff origin/ins2"? | 02:31 | |
pmichaud_ | no, because HEAD is different from where ins2 branched | ||
wayland76 | Oh, ok :) | ||
pmichaud_ | so I had to go back and find the branch point, then apply the patch to that. | ||
wayland76 | Because I made a patch of your ins2 stuff, applied it to head, and then did my own code on top of that :) | 02:32 | |
pmichaud_ | right. | ||
For install stuff I want to keep everything in the ins2 branch until we get it working (on multiple platforms), then I'll move it to head | |||
I don't want to put the install stuff in head until we've tested/confirmed it on multiple platforms | |||
wayland76 | I think it's fair to merge it as long as it works better that HEAD :) | ||
pmichaud_ | no ... (more) | 02:33 | |
wayland76 | But I agree about multi-platform :) | ||
pmichaud_ | if someone has a platform that works now but doesn't work in the install branch, then by prematurely moving it to head we'd be cutting out those platforms | ||
(and we might not know how long until we get it fixed) | |||
02:33
awwaiid joined
|
|||
wayland76 | Yeah, I pretty much agree; I think we were using different words to try to say the same thing | 02:34 | |
pmichaud_ | okay. | ||
anyway, I don't plan to move the install stuff into head until after we've confirmed it runs on various platforms. | 02:35 | ||
wayland76 | Agreed | ||
pmichaud_ | (because at the moment there's not an easy way to do the install stuff *and* preserve the ability to work against the build copy of Parrot) | ||
wayland76 | Ah, ok. | ||
pmichaud_ | so when we switch to using an installed parrot for building rakudo, it'll have to be switched for everyone | 02:36 | |
wayland76 | Sounds good to me :) | ||
pmichaud_ | (or we start maintaining separate Makefiles, or adding lots of conditionals, or doing all sorts of other ugly things I'd rather avoid) | ||
anyway, if you can re-send a new patch that has just the .spec files and whatever other changes you think are needed to the current ins2 branch, I can apply them. | 02:37 | ||
wayland76 | Did you come up with an alternative to the MANIFEST? | 02:38 | |
pmichaud_ | yes. | ||
wayland76 | Great :) | 02:39 | |
02:39
jauaor joined
|
|||
pmichaud_ | github.com/rakudo/rakudo/blob/94417...akefile.in lines 207 through 215 | 02:39 | |
wayland76 | Looks good. I'll try it out, although it may have to wait until Monday. | 02:42 | |
pmichaud_ | that's fine, I have a few more patches to review for it and then will ask others to try out the branch | ||
wayland76 | Oh, ok | 02:43 | |
02:43
ewilhelm joined
02:49
the_irrational_1 joined
02:55
Jedai joined
02:59
mepplock left
03:00
Chillance__ left
03:07
mkfort_ joined
|
|||
pmichaud_ | okay, done with my patches to ins2 (for now) | 03:08 | |
Any test reports on the 'ins2' branch from various platforms would be greatly appreciated. | |||
03:10
hercynium left
|
|||
pmichaud_ | (there's also a 'make install' target, if people would like to test that) | 03:11 | |
time for some dinner | 03:13 | ||
03:18
mkfort left
03:20
donaldh left,
donaldh joined
|
|||
wayland76 | pmichaud_: Yay, thanks :) | 03:23 | |
03:25
colomon joined
|
|||
cotto | should 'git checkout ins2' get me working with the right branch? | 03:27 | |
wayland76 | That's what I'd be guessing | 03:36 | |
Wait, | |||
depends, I think | |||
Anyway, try it; if you mess it up, you can always try something else | |||
Hmm. Anyway, I've found "git branch -a" to be useful in debugging these git branch things | 03:37 | ||
Food calls. AFK & | |||
03:39
arnsholt left
03:42
colomon left
|
|||
cotto | it doesn't work if I run make clean in Parrot's build dir | 03:42 | |
make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/src/parrot/parrot-svn-clean/runtime/parrot/library/PGE/Perl6Grammar.pbc', needed by `src/gen_grammar.pir'. Stop. | 03:44 | ||
dukeleto | cotto: git checkout -b ins2 upstream/ins2 (where upstream is the name of the remote) | 03:45 | |
03:45
skids joined
|
|||
dukeleto | pmichaud: do you want anything other than "make spectest" on ins2? | 03:45 | |
pugs_svn | r27721 | lwall++ | [STD] correctly recognize missing << or >>, Juerd++ | 03:47 | |
r27721 | lwall++ | [STD] remove some "daunt" and visual confusion from parsefail messages | |||
dukeleto | pmichaud: ins2 "make test" passes on OS X 10.5.7, gcc 4.0.1, running "make spectest" now | 03:49 | |
03:49
lumi__ left
03:54
KyleHa joined
|
|||
KyleHa | Howdy folks. | 03:55 | |
If, indeed, there are any folks. | |||
TimToady hides behind a sigil | |||
03:55
skids_ joined
|
|||
sjohnson | our $toady; | 03:56 | |
KyleHa | Aw, the finest of folks! | ||
I noticed someone else noticing this earlier today: | |||
rakudo: say Any ~~ Object; say Object ~~ Any; | |||
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«11» | ||
KyleHa | I'm wondering which of those is wrong and which is right and whether that's in the spec somewhere. | 03:57 | |
TimToady | the second is wrong | ||
sjohnson | TimCodey always has the right answer | 03:58 | |
TimToady | Wiley Codey | ||
sjohnson | TimToady: have you ever been to India? | 03:59 | |
TimToady | not yet | 04:00 | |
04:03
lumi_ joined
|
|||
KyleHa | rakudo: say Int ~~ Num; say Num ~~ Int; | 04:04 | |
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«10» | ||
04:10
finanalyst joined
|
|||
pugs_svn | r27722 | kyle++ | [t/spec] Object-Any matching, jntn++ and TimToady++ | 04:12 | |
KyleHa | Bleah, I misspelled jnthn++ | 04:13 | |
finanalyst | @seen TimToady | 04:14 | |
lambdabot | TimToady is in #perl6. I last heard TimToady speak 14m 31s ago. | ||
04:15
jauaor left
|
|||
finanalyst | TimToady: which method should I use to determine what traits are associated with a variable? | 04:15 | |
i tried searching the specs for WHAT and WHICH but could not find them with the Google tool on perlcabal | 04:16 | ||
04:24
tann joined
|
|||
dukeleto | pmichaud: ins2 has some spectest failures: gist.github.com/154694 | 04:29 | |
04:29
lumi_ left
|
|||
TimToady | finanalyst: traits mix in methods to an object at compile time, so once the variable is declared, it's introspection is like the introspection of any other object, and "I came from a trait" is not known. | 04:31 | |
*its | |||
std: @a »* 4 | |||
p6eval | std 27722: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===Missing « or » at /tmp/qZr1gnExRt line 1:------> @a »*⏏ 4 expecting infix_circumfix_meta_operator__S_290Fre_NchOther potential difficulties: Variable @a is not predeclared at /tmp/qZr1gnExRt line 1:------> | ||
..@a⏏[31… | |||
cotto | how colorful | 04:33 | |
sjohnson | 4color! | ||
finanalyst | TimToady: so how would i determine whether a variable is readonly ? @x.WHAT ? | ||
rakudo: my @x is ro; say @x.WHAT | 04:34 | ||
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«No applicable candidates found to dispatch to for 'trait_mod:is'in Main (/tmp/PeL5wYr5R7:2)» | ||
04:35
eternaleye joined
|
|||
TimToady | rakudo: my @x is readonly; say @x.readonly | 04:35 | |
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«No applicable candidates found to dispatch to for 'trait_mod:is'in Main (/tmp/qENGOqYNiZ:2)» | ||
finanalyst | is there a way to list the roles associated with a variable? | 04:36 | |
04:37
justatheory joined
|
|||
finanalyst | std: @a>>*4 | 04:40 | |
p6eval | std 27722: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===Missing << or >> at /tmp/Ly40vIQhhZ line 1:------> @a>>*⏏4 expecting infix_circumfix_meta_operator__S_291LtLt_GtGtOther potential difficulties: Variable @a is not predeclared at /tmp/Ly40vIQhhZ line 1:------> | ||
..@a⏏… | |||
finanalyst | std: my @a; @a>>*>>4 | 04:41 | |
p6eval | std 27722: OUTPUT«ok 00:02 37m» | ||
04:41
justatheory left
|
|||
pmichaud_ | back again | 04:48 | |
"make spectest" in the ins branch will undoubtedly have some fails | 04:49 | ||
"make test" is sufficient | |||
04:49
lumi_ joined
|
|||
finanalyst | pmichaud_: is there a way to get a list of the traits/roles associated with a variable? | 04:49 | |
pmichaud_ | finanalyst: I'm not aware of one, but that doesn't mean there isn't one | 04:50 | |
sjohnson | Perl 6 Q: will there be a @array[] push syntax, much like PHP? | 04:51 | |
@array .= 'another item'; # maybe? | |||
lambdabot | Avast! | ||
finanalyst | sjohnson: @array.push('some stuff') | ||
sjohnson | o | 04:52 | |
finanalyst | rakudo: my @x=1,2,3; @x .= push: 5; @x.perl.say | 04:53 | |
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«Statement not terminated properly at line 2, near ": 5; @x.pe"in Main (src/gen_setting.pm:3343)» | ||
sjohnson | rakudo: my @x=1,2,3; @x .= push 5; @x.perl.say | ||
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«[1, 2, 3, 5]» | ||
sjohnson | rakudo: my @x=1,2,3; @x .= 5; @x.perl.say | ||
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«.= must have a call on the right hand side at line 2, near " .= 5; @x."in Main (src/gen_setting.pm:2602)» | ||
finanalyst | sjohnson: .= calls something. 5 is not callable | 04:54 | |
sjohnson | finanalyst: how do you contatinate $strings? | 04:55 | |
Tene | ~ | ||
so use ~= | |||
finanalyst | rakudo: my $s='1234'; my $t='abcd'; say $s~$t | ||
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«1234abcd» | ||
sjohnson | cool man | 04:56 | |
finanalyst | rakudo: my $s='abcd'; $s ~= '43'; $s.say | ||
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«abcd43» | ||
sjohnson | squiggle operator | 04:57 | |
tann | rakudo: my $vals = [1,2]; printf "%d %d", $vals; | ||
pmichaud_ | "stitching operator" :-) | ||
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in get_integer()in Main (/tmp/puBmccAa1H:2)» | ||
04:57
jhelwig joined
|
|||
tann | pmichaud: ^^^ a bug? | 04:57 | |
pmichaud_ | tann: " | ||
"Null PMC is almost always a bug" | |||
tann | granted $vals.list will work | ||
finanalyst | rakudo: my $vals = [1,2]; printf( "%d %d", $vals) | 04:58 | |
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in get_integer()in Main (/tmp/pc8uyFEtfg:2)» | ||
finanalyst | rakudo: my @vals = [1,2]; printf "%d %d", @vals | 04:59 | |
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in get_integer()in Main (/tmp/Xv0i0S5GUR:2)» | ||
finanalyst | rakudo: my @vals = [1,2]; printf("%d %d", @vals) | ||
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in get_integer()in Main (/tmp/15KpPPeVDa:2)» | ||
finanalyst | rakudo: my @vals = 1,2; printf("%d %d", @vals) | ||
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«1 2» | ||
tann | maybe, printf should always faltten to list? | 05:00 | |
pmichaud_ | it shouldn't auto-flatten a scalar I don't think. | ||
finanalyst | i thought printf was working in some form | ||
tann | it does | ||
pmichaud_ | printf is working. It's having trouble with "%d %d" when there's only one argument following | ||
tann | it only chokes with objects | ||
pmichaud_ | rakudo: my $vals = [4]; printf("%d %d", $vals); | 05:01 | |
Tene | rakudo: my $vals = [1,2]; printf("%d %d", |$vals); | ||
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in get_integer()in Main (/tmp/EBSWVH71OI:2)» | ||
rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«1 2» | |||
pmichaud_ | rakudo: my $vals = [4]; printf("%d", $vals); | ||
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«1» | ||
tann | rakudo: printf "%d %d", [1, 2], 3; | 05:02 | |
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«2 3» | ||
Tene | that's the correct behavior. | ||
pmichaud_ | and come to think of it, the bug is in parrot's sprintf opcode. I'm not sure how to fix that. | 05:03 | |
pmichaud_ looks. | |||
looks like too much trouble to track tonight :-| | 05:06 | ||
anyway, it can be rakudobugged | |||
tann | any better *working* code does this in rakudo? $s = $s.substr(0,1) ~ '-' ~ $s.substr(1); | 05:19 | |
05:22
nihiliad left
|
|||
PerlJam | tann: depends on how you define better :) | 05:33 | |
my $s = "foo"; $s ~~ /^./; $s.=subst($/,"$/-"); say $s; # working, yes; better, ... maybe | |||
tann | PerlJam: less verbose == better :) | 05:34 | |
PerlJam: cool.... i was trying to find substitute for substr($s, 1, 0) = '-'; :) | 05:35 | ||
05:35
jauaor joined
|
|||
PerlJam | lvalue substr doesn't work AFAIL | 05:35 | |
er, AFAIK | |||
tann | PerlJam: yup...that's why the workaround | 05:36 | |
the joy of making perl5 code works in rakudo :) | |||
PerlJam | Ideally, $s .= subst(/^./, "$/-"); should work too | 05:37 | |
tann | PerlJam: $/ holds the match now (w/o the ^ $) ? | 05:38 | |
05:38
frew_ joined
|
|||
PerlJam | the stringy version of $/ is what was matched. | 05:39 | |
tann | rakudo: my $s = "abc"; $s .= subst(/^./, "$/-"); | 05:40 | |
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«Use of uninitialized value» | ||
tann | rakudo: my $s = "abc"; $s ~~ /^./; $s .= subst(/^./, "$/-"); | 05:41 | |
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: ( no output ) | ||
tann | oh man..too cryptic... i like the java-like verbose version $s = $s1 ~ '-' ~ $s2; :( | 05:43 | |
PerlJam | Hmm. I guess $s .= subst(/^./, "$/-"); can't work. | 05:44 | |
egypt | yay! \o/ | ||
when did rakudo get "The grammar has no TOP rule..." errmsg? | 05:45 | ||
PerlJam | rakudo: my $s = "foo"; $s .= subst(/^./, { "$_-" }); say $s; | 05:46 | |
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«f-oo» | ||
PerlJam | ah, there we go. | ||
(guessing for magic)++ | |||
egypt: it's been a while now I think. according to git blame, May 6, 2008 was when that line was added. | 05:48 | ||
egypt | PerlJam: that's strange, I'm sure I didn't get that as recently as a month ago | 05:49 | |
PerlJam | no offense, but I trust git more than your memory :) | 05:51 | |
tann | pugs: my $s = "foo"; substr($s, 1, 0) = '-'; say $s; | 05:54 | |
p6eval | pugs: OUTPUT«f-oo» | ||
PerlJam | ah, lvalue substr *does* work. | ||
(for pugs :) | |||
so ... all you have to do is run pugs from within rakudo. | 05:55 | ||
05:56
unitxt left
|
|||
tann | what about use v5? :P | 05:56 | |
06:05
lumi_ left
06:33
asciiville joined
06:34
asciiville left
06:35
lumi_ joined
06:36
asciiville joined
06:38
synth left
|
|||
asciiville | asdf | 06:39 | |
06:40
skids_ left
06:50
kane___ left
|
|||
TimToady | std: asdf | 06:59 | |
p6eval | std 27722: OUTPUT«Undeclared routine: asdf used at 1 ok 00:02 36m» | ||
07:00
beggars left
|
|||
pmichaud_ | asqew | 07:02 | |
tann | std: :) | ||
p6eval | std 27722: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===Illegal use of colon as invocant marker at /tmp/OCXdSL9brn line 1:------> :⏏)FAILED 00:02 36m» | ||
tann | std: :D | ||
p6eval | std 27722: OUTPUT«ok 00:02 36m» | ||
tann | std: :D :O | 07:03 | |
p6eval | std 27722: OUTPUT«ok 00:02 36m» | ||
tann | now if there's an editor that can display smileys for p6 :D | 07:04 | |
07:10
sri_kraih left
|
|||
cbk | moritz_, pmichaud_ thanks but I have to go to work now. THANKS rakudo.org for #19 went to sleep at 3am last night and woke up at 7am. now I'm going to be a zombie at work :) | 07:13 | |
07:14
cbk left
|
|||
TimToady | zzz & | 07:19 | |
07:20
donaldh left
|
|||
tann | rakudo: multi sub f(%h) { 'h' }; multi sub f(@a) { 'a' }; multi sub f { 'oops!' }; f(1); | 07:20 | |
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«No applicable candidates found to dispatch to for 'f'in Main (/tmp/W4BBIMfQ6j:2)» | ||
07:20
donaldh joined
|
|||
tann | pugs: multi sub f(%h) { 'h' }; multi sub f(@a) { 'a' }; multi sub f { 'oops!' }; f(1); | 07:22 | |
p6eval | pugs: ( no output ) | ||
tann | multi sub f(%h) { 'h' }; multi sub f(@a) { 'a' }; multi sub f { 'oops!' }; say f(1); | ||
pugs: multi sub f(%h) { 'h' }; multi sub f(@a) { 'a' }; multi sub f { 'oops!' }; say f(1); | |||
p6eval | pugs: OUTPUT«oops!» | ||
07:30
Su-Shee joined
|
|||
Su-Shee | good morning future. :) | 07:30 | |
pmichaud_ | The future is here? | 07:46 | |
07:46
pmichaud_ is now known as pmichaud
|
|||
egypt | good morning Su-Shee :) | 07:46 | |
Su-Shee | pmichaud: aren't you working like there is no tomorrow on the future? :) | ||
pmichaud | Su-Shee: that sounds about right, yes. :-) | 07:47 | |
egypt | wouldn't that be kinda contradictory? | ||
pmichaud | egypt: yes, but that's pretty much me in a nutshell. | 07:48 | |
Su-Shee | egypt: it's all very zen with rakudo.. the future has no tomorrow, it's now. ;) | ||
egypt | Su-Shee: i am too tired for zen. my body clock needs to be defragged :( | 07:56 | |
but that's neither here nor there; good morning too you; i'm off to bed :) | 07:57 | ||
Tene having fun with curses in rakudo. :) | |||
Tene annoyed by unicode fail in Parrot curses. :( | |||
egypt | Tene: rakudo can do curses? how? | 07:58 | |
Tene | egypt: use Curses:from<parrot>; | ||
egypt might play with rakudo a little longger :) | 07:59 | ||
lisppaste3 | tene pasted "Curses example for egypt" at paste.lisp.org/display/84163 | ||
Tene | This works against latest parrot. Not against Parrot 1.4, though. There were a couple of missing curses functions. | 08:00 | |
Bet you can't tell what I'm working on. ;) | 08:01 | ||
tann | rakudo: multi sub f(Sub $f) { 'sub' }; multi sub f(Int $n) { 'int' }; f(sub { 1 }); | 08:03 | |
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: ( no output ) | ||
tann | oh..interesting..i got a 'Bus error' on my mac | 08:04 | |
Tene | nice! | 08:05 | |
tann | it looks like my rakudo build is kinda hmm...jumpy | 08:06 | |
08:08
asciiville left
|
|||
tann | rakudo: multi sub f(Sub $f) { 'sub' }; multi sub f(Int $n) { 'int' }; say f(sub { 1 }); | 08:08 | |
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«sub» | 08:09 | |
tann | rakudo: multi sub f(Code $f) { 'sub' }; multi sub f(Int $n) { 'int' }; say f(sub { 1 }); | ||
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«sub» | ||
tann | rakudo: multi sub f(Code $f) { 'sub' }; multi sub f(Int $n) { 'int' }; say f(1); | ||
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«int» | ||
tann | std: sub f(Str|Code $a) { say $a.WHAT }; f("p5"); | 08:16 | |
p6eval | std 27722: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===Unable to parse multisig; couldn't find final ')' at /tmp/Ugd7HChH6t line 1:------> sub f(Str⏏|Code $a) { say $a.WHAT }; f("p5"); expecting any of: param_sep parameter post_constraint trait | 08:17 | |
..type_constraint whitespaceFAIL… | |||
08:17
redicaps1 joined
08:32
masak joined
|
|||
dukeleto | pmichaud: some failing tests in your ins2 branch: gist.github.com/154748 gist.github.com/154745 | 08:33 | |
08:34
tann_ joined,
tann left
|
|||
moritz_ | looks to me like ins2 isn't sufficiently up-to-date | 08:34 | |
Tene | hai masak | 08:36 | |
masak | y0 Tene | ||
Tene | got something for you to look at. 'sec. | ||
masak curious | 08:37 | ||
Tene | github.com/tene/cutegirls/tree/b239...127903f/p6 | 08:39 | |
masak | ooh, getch! | 08:40 | |
(but can we please also work at getting the corresponding call into core Rakudo?) | |||
Tene: anyway, way cool! | 08:41 | ||
Tene | masak: what call? | 08:42 | |
masak | getch. | ||
don't remember what it's supposed to be in Perl 6. | |||
masak checks | |||
Tene | masak: That's a Curses getch. Different from reading a keystroke without curses, I think... not quite sure. | ||
masak | ok. | 08:43 | |
I found some hints in S32/IO. getc reads a character from an IO object. | |||
but there's also a "these are not the droids you're looking for" note there. | 08:44 | ||
saying I really want 'readkey()', which hasn't been specced yet. | |||
Tene | there's always .read(1), but that's "read one byte" not "read one character". | 08:45 | |
I discovered that Parrot's curses library is broken WRT unicode. :( | |||
masak | :( | ||
Tene | but maybe I will fix it! | ||
yay fixing! | 08:46 | ||
But not tonight. | |||
masak | I'm getting record amounts (for me) of comments to "Three things in Perl 6 that aren't so great", proving once again that the only thing more attention-grabbing than shiny graphics is a medium-sized rant. | 08:48 | |
moritz_ | masak: there are also some comments on www.reddit.com/r/programming/commen..._so_great/ | 08:49 | |
masak | thank you. | 08:50 | |
I always miss when that kind of linkage happens. | |||
there ought to be a mechanism for telling the original author (except for moritz_++, that is) | |||
wow, comments so far exceed my expectations of a reddit thread. | 08:52 | ||
Tene | masak: fwiw, check out UI.pm on that github directory I linked. I indented all the methods in those classes. :) | 08:53 | |
masak | Tene: github is sad right now. they're deploying something, I think. | 08:54 | |
Tene | :( | ||
masak | I can't clone the repo either. | 08:57 | |
Tene | so sad. :( | ||
masak | bah, time to do some hacking instead. :) | ||
still racing towards being able to blog later today about week 11 of Web.pm | |||
Tene | allalone.org/~tene/cg.tar.bz2 | 08:58 | |
has a copy of the repo | |||
masak | danke. | ||
Tene | masak: I've got most of the weekend free, so please let me know if there's anything you'd like me to do for Web. | ||
message on IRC on e-mail are both great. | 08:59 | ||
masak | Tene: I haven't really updated you on my recent thoughts about the feasibility of making a Parrot-based version of Hitomi. | ||
at present, I think it's harder than I originally thought. | |||
things are pretty dynamic on the inside of Genshi. | 09:00 | ||
Tene | I'm actually going to sleep right now, but I'd love to see e-mail from you when I wake up. | ||
'night | |||
masak | I'll se what I can do. | ||
good night. | |||
Tene: hey, you indented your classes, but you have no Pod in there whatsoever! | 09:01 | ||
that's no challenge. :) | 09:02 | ||
finanalyst | masak: re indenting POD is it possible to use unspace? | ||
masak | finanalyst: don't think so. | ||
finanalyst | eg. \ =begin | ||
masak | unspace is a feature of Perl 6, and Pod is basically a separate language. | 09:03 | |
not just a slang, but a separate language. | |||
(AFAIU) | |||
finanalyst | but Pod is used in perl6 | ||
masak | reason being, Pod translators shouldn't have to know Perl 6. | ||
haven't seen unspace specced in Pod, ergo it's not in Pod. | |||
09:03
zamolxes left
|
|||
finanalyst | then perhaps, Pod implementors should use unspace | 09:03 | |
masak | finanalyst: it would certainly solve the problem almost entirely. | 09:04 | |
finanalyst: I cannot say how intrusive it would be to the idea of Pod itself, though. | |||
finanalyst | ?(@pod-implementors == @perl6-implementors) | ||
lambdabot | Unknown command, try @list | ||
masak | lambdabot: hush. | 09:05 | |
finanalyst | how much is Pod used outside of perl? | ||
masak | finanalyst: @pod-spec-authors is basically TheDamian. | ||
finanalyst | realistically as opposed to idealistically? | ||
thought so | 09:06 | ||
finanalyst sending Damian an email | |||
masak | finanalyst: and he hasn't made a sound about it in a couple of years. | ||
finanalyst | he has said he is making progress quietly | ||
masak | yes, but he said that in 2006. | 09:07 | |
meanwhile, back in 2009, I'm starting to want to mark up my document with Pod. | |||
09:10
molaf_x left
|
|||
pmichaud | for those playing with the 'ins2' branch -- it's known that spectests will fail | 09:25 | |
I just need "make test" | |||
09:25
pmurias joined
|
|||
masak | rakudo: class A { has @!a; method foo { .say for @!a.elems, @!a.perl } }; sub bar(*%_) { A.new(|%_) }; my @b = 42,43,44; bar(:a(@b)).foo | 09:27 | |
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«1[[42, 43, 44]]» | ||
masak | this is related to flaws I experienced yesterday. | 09:28 | |
when arrays are passed through *%_, they get an extra layer of array around them. | |||
masak submits rakudobug | |||
09:30
colomon joined
|
|||
pmichaud | that actually seems right to me | 09:31 | |
because the value portion of a pair is a scalar | 09:32 | ||
and placing an array into a scalar creates a reference | |||
(modulo any new capture/parcel semantics) | 09:35 | ||
masak | pmichaud: ok. let's say I want to have an array in my @!a. | 09:36 | |
(and I need to use *%_ because I'm passing unknown things along) | |||
how do I do it? | |||
pmichaud | I don't know. | ||
I'm not arguing in favor of the current semantics -- I'm just having trouble seeing how they ought to work | 09:37 | ||
masak | it works without the *%_ step. or without the class/attr. | ||
pmichaud | well, the %* definitely converts pairs into a hash | ||
masak | and yet, this works: | 09:38 | |
rakudo: sub foo(:@a) { say @a.elems }; sub bar(*%_) { foo(|%_) }; my @b = 42,43,44; bar(:a(@b)) | |||
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«3» | ||
pmichaud | okay, it must be something in .new then | 09:39 | |
masak | it's only when this is combined with storing the array into an attr in an object that the extra layer of array is added. | ||
masak adds this to the bug ticket | |||
pmichaud | my guess is going to be that :a(@b) builds a named argument with a capture | 09:40 | |
interestingly, though, that would mean that changes to @b would affect the named argument | |||
anyway, it's fine to file it as a bug, but I think we'll have to wait for spec clarity on captures/flattening before it can be reliably fixed (or even reliably determined what "fixed" means) | 09:42 | ||
masak | yes, I understand. | ||
I'll be logging off now. going to Stockholm to spend the day with nerdy people. will be back tonight for the massive Week 11/Web.pm-summary-so-far blog post. | 09:44 | ||
see you then. o/ | |||
09:44
masak left
|
|||
pmichaud | class A { has @!a; method foo { say @!a.elems; } }; my @b = 42,43; sub bar(*%_) { @b = 1..10; A.new(|%_) }; bar(:a(@b)).foo | 09:44 | |
2? or 10? | |||
afk also | 09:45 | ||
09:59
jauaor left
10:04
wknight8111 joined
10:08
tann_ left,
egypt is now known as bpetering
10:18
payload left
10:34
meppl joined
10:36
jauaor joined
10:37
Front_slash joined
10:51
zamolxes joined
10:55
icwiener joined
10:59
fridim_ joined
11:02
wknight8111 left
11:05
yahooooo left
11:07
yahooooo joined
|
|||
jnthn | o/ | 11:17 | |
eiro | hello | 11:18 | |
in for @a { say $^a++ } , $a is read only ... cool ! | 11:19 | ||
11:20
donaldh left,
payload joined
|
|||
eiro | for @a <-> $a { say $a } $a is side effect | 11:20 | |
is there a way to write something like for @a -> temp $a { # here i can modify the temp value of $a | |||
11:20
donaldh joined
|
|||
eiro | ( is rw works like <-> ) | 11:22 | |
jnthn | is copy | 11:23 | |
for @a -> $a is copy { ... } | |||
eiro | thx jnthn | ||
no short for it ? | |||
11:24
Jedai left
|
|||
payload | rakudo: my @a = 1..5; for @a <-> $a { $a *= 2 }; say @a | 11:24 | |
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«246810» | ||
eiro | payload, that's side effect! | 11:25 | |
i don't want side effect! | |||
jnthn | eiro: That isn't so long! :-P | 11:26 | |
payload | rakudo: my @a = 1..5; for @a -> $a is copy { $a *= 2; print $a }; say " ", @a.perl | ||
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«246810 [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]» | ||
eiro | jnthn, too long for perl programmer :) | 11:27 | |
jnthn, it feel to me that for @a { say $^a } must be the default behavior | 11:28 | ||
jnthn | That's pretty much equivalent to for @a -> $a { say $a } | 11:30 | |
rakudo: my $foo = { %^a }; say $foo.signature.perl; | |||
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«:(%a)» | ||
jnthn | rakudo: my $foo = { $^a }; say $foo.signature.perl; # gah, meant this | ||
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«:(Object $a)» | ||
jnthn | rakudo: my $foo = -> $a { $a }; say $foo.signature.perl; # same, I expect | 11:31 | |
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«:(Object $a)» | ||
jnthn | introspection++ | ||
eiro | jnthn, no ... what i meant is: by default, $a is readonly ... not a copy | 11:33 | |
finanalyst | rakudo: my @a; foo(@a);@a = 4,3,2;sub foo(@z) { bar(@z) }; sub bar(@x) { } | 11:34 | |
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«Cannot assign to readonly variable.in Main (/tmp/fO36SkkFpF:2)» | ||
finanalyst | problem is the assignment to @a after calling foo | ||
any help as to a workaround? | 11:35 | ||
Su-Shee | wow what do I read with my old eyes? :) "There will be the first major release of Rakudo in spring 2010" ? | 11:36 | |
finanalyst | before christmas | 11:39 | |
jnthn | finanalyst: That looks like a rakudo bug.. | ||
Su-Shee | well andy lester of perl buzz posted it.. | ||
jnthn | rakudo: my @a; @a = 4,3,2; sub foo(@z) { bar(@z) }; sub bar(@x) { } | 11:40 | |
11:40
fridim_ left
|
|||
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: ( no output ) | 11:40 | |
jnthn | rakudo: my @a; foo(@a); @a = 4,3,2; sub foo(@z) { bar(@z) }; sub bar(@x) { } | ||
eiro | have a nice WE all | ||
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«Cannot assign to readonly variable.in Main (/tmp/bYWrd085jV:2)» | ||
jnthn | rakudo: my @a; bar(@a); @a = 4,3,2; sub foo(@z) { bar(@z) }; sub bar(@x) { } | ||
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: ( no output ) | ||
jnthn | ouch | ||
Looks like bug. :-/ | |||
finanalyst | jnthn: just posted a bug | 11:41 | |
jnthn | Thanks. | 11:42 | |
finanalyst | i spent over a week narrowing it down to this code | ||
just found a workaround | 11:44 | ||
11:44
frew_ left
|
|||
finanalyst | rakudo: my @a; foo(@a);@a = 4,3,2;sub foo(@z) { my @xz = @z; bar(@xz) }; sub bar(@x) { } | 11:44 | |
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: ( no output ) | ||
finanalyst | rakudo: my @a; foo(@a);@a = 4,3,2;sub foo(@z) { my @xz = @z; bar(@xz) }; sub bar(@x) { };say @a.perl | 11:45 | |
p6eval | rakudo dd5767: OUTPUT«[4, 3, 2]» | ||
11:48
molaf joined
11:49
payload1 joined,
payload left
|
|||
jauaor | :P | 11:51 | |
11:51
molaf left
12:09
bpetering left
12:17
icwiener_ joined
12:20
colomon left
12:21
unitxt joined,
unitxt left
12:33
icwiener left
12:35
icwiener_ left
12:36
fridim_ joined
12:51
redicaps1 left
|
|||
pugs_svn | r27723 | moritz++ | [t/spec] unfudge [//] and [||] tests for rakudo | 12:54 | |
13:03
finanalyst left
13:20
icwiener_ joined
|
|||
hoelzro | good (morning), perl6! | 13:37 | |
sbp | hey hoelzro | 13:38 | |
hoelzro | so I wrote the following program running on Rakudo: pastebin.com/d65b49dc1 | 13:39 | |
but when I type a line, ex. "say 'hello'", I get this error: | |||
ResizablePMCArray: Can't pop from an empty array! in Main (src/gen_setting.pm:3340) | 13:40 | ||
wondering if anyone had any insight into that | |||
or if someone knows a way for me to get a better stack trace | |||
s/better// | 13:41 | ||
jnthn | ooh, I haven't seen anybody try that one before. ;-) | 13:48 | |
hoelzro | per pmichaud's suggestion, I'm going to try to create an online REPL for Rakudo =) | 13:49 | |
so I figured I'd rip apart HLLCompiler.interactive | |||
jnthn | :-) | ||
I'm guessing it is some compiler state not being set up properly or something like that. | 13:51 | ||
hoelzro | that was my guess as well | 13:52 | |
I just wish I knew which array it was trying to pop from | 13:53 | ||
I'll continue to play around with it | |||
jnthn | @?BLOCKS perhaps, but you'd expect it to have pushed onto there too. :-S | 13:54 | |
13:57
Chillance joined
|
|||
jnthn | hoelzro: | 14:01 | |
Got a stack trace for you that's a bit more helpful. | |||
14:01
colomon joined
|
|||
jnthn | hoelzro: gist.github.com/154804 | 14:01 | |
hoelzro | jnthn: thanks! | 14:02 | |
jnthn | hoelzro: Added patch to the gist to a line you can comment out to get these details | ||
hoelzro | that'll help a LOT, how'd you do that? | ||
jnthn | hoelzro: so if you apply that patch you can get it | 14:03 | |
hoelzro | awesome | ||
jnthn | The mechanism getting in there way there is the one that only shows Routines in the backtrace, not just any Block (since all are Parrot-level subs) | 14:04 | |
hoelzro | I'm a little inexperienced with PIR; I assume pop_eh != pop, and is special? | ||
jnthn | But it may be nice to print out also the Parrot-level subs when we're outside of Perl 6 code. | ||
pop_eh = pop the top exception handler off the top of the exception handler stack | 14:05 | ||
hoelzro | ah | ||
jnthn | Opposite of push_eh | ||
hoelzro | ok, there's only one pop in parse, so this "should" be easy | ||
jnthn | afk for a little bit, back later | 14:06 | |
hoelzro | ok, thanks again | ||
jnthn | np, look forward to seeing an online REPL! :-) | ||
hoelzro | I'll do what I can =) | 14:07 | |
14:17
nihiliad joined
|
|||
pmichaud | good morning, #perl6 | 14:18 | |
the biggest issue with the REPL is handling lexicals. | |||
araujo | morning | 14:19 | |
hoelzro | pmichaud: I decided not to worry about that for now | 14:21 | |
I'm just going to try to get a basic online, non-safe REPL working | |||
just something I can run at home | |||
then I'll add security | |||
I'm hoping to leverage HLLCompiler, so if we add lexicals to the standard REPL, they "should" work in the online version | 14:22 | ||
pmichaud | hoelzro: yes, I agree -- I want the standard REPL to be able to handle lexicals | 14:24 | |
hoelzro: so you're just working on the online part, then? | |||
hoelzro | yup =) | ||
pmichaud | that sounds like an excellent plan | ||
hoelzro | I had some great help from jnthn | ||
I'm trying to get a simple script (seen in a message of mine above) working, and so I'm working on a bug | 14:25 | ||
then I'm thinking of subclassing Perl6::Compiler to create an online, interactive REPL | |||
pmichaud | hoelzro: yes, I just looked at the pastebin. | 14:27 | |
I don't think you need/want ".new" on Perl6::Compiler | |||
hoelzro | oh? | ||
pmichaud | you might be able to do Perl6::Compiler.interactive | 14:28 | |
pmichaud tries it | |||
hoelzro | interesting | ||
pmichaud | works for me | ||
hoelzro | interesting | ||
pmichaud | (I think that it ought to work with .new on Perl6::Compiler, yes -- but I think the current Perl6::Compiler object doesn't know how to handle multiple instances of itself. | 14:29 | |
hoelzro | then that's another issue for another time | ||
I'll dig through interactive then | 14:30 | ||
and attempt to replace the I/O with some sort of online version | |||
pmichaud | seems very reasonable. | ||
hoelzro | another thing I'd like to try to get working is multi-line input for blocks in the REPL | 14:33 | |
ex. for (1..10) {\n<different prompt until final }> | |||
doing that bit with the online version could get annoying | 14:34 | ||
14:36
firmicus joined
|
|||
pmichaud | hoelzro: well, the ultimate way that's currently designed to happen is via '.moreinput' in the grammar. | 14:38 | |
the STD.pm grammar has a .moreinput subrule that says "I really need more input in order to get to something that is parseable" | 14:39 | ||
hoelzro | ok | ||
pmichaud | Rakudo hasn't adopted that yet, but we'll need to. Actually, it really wants to go into PCT::Grammar at some point, so that all grammars can take advantage of it. | ||
14:43
ZuLuuuuuu joined,
jevin left
14:44
firmicus left
14:48
pmurias left
|
|||
jnthn | hi pmichaud | 14:54 | |
.oO( did he fly already ) |
|||
moritz_ | he sais something 4 minutes ago in #parrot | ||
s/sais/said/ | |||
jnthn didn't even parse sais as wrong English, but curious lolspeak | 14:55 | ||
pmichaud | I'm still here, but they're boarding now | 14:56 | |
so I'm about to be not-here | |||
moritz_ | I just tested ins2 successfully on Debian Lenny/amd64 | 14:57 | |
pmichaud | \o/ | ||
many thanks | |||
I'm primarily interested in Win32 next | |||
jnthn | uh-oh | ||
pmichaud: p6object's isa did something horrid | |||
pmichaud: Assumed that if we were matching against Any and it wasn't a Junction it was fine. | 14:58 | ||
pmichaud: And thus Object ~~ Any. | |||
pmichaud | right | ||
I saw that. | |||
jnthn | Yeah | ||
It's gotta die. I know it helps performance. | |||
But it also ties the multi dispatcher's narrowness analysis in knots. | |||
I was sure I'd got a bug...but no, garbage in, circularity error out. | |||
pmichaud | well, keep in mind that the shortcutting is also there to be able to handle non-Rakudo objects | 14:59 | |
jnthn | Turns out making it give the correct answer breaks two spectests. Going to investigate. One looks trivial fix (case of incorrect signature) anyway. | ||
Yeah, there is that too. | |||
We need a better plan on that I guess. | |||
pmichaud | the other purpose for the shortcutting was so that non-native Rakudo objects still look like subclasses of Any | 15:00 | |
jnthn | Right, I get that. | ||
pmichaud | since we have our own p6metaclass, does this mean we can have our own isa? | ||
jnthn | We need to find a different way to provide for that, which doesn't result in us giving wrong results. | ||
pmichaud | and move the rakudo-specific stuff out of the parrot p6metaclass? | ||
jnthn | Well, actually I'm talking bull. It's actually in ACCEPTS that we have the issue. :-) | 15:01 | |
But yes, we can have our own too. | |||
Would you ratehr I did that and left p6o alone? | |||
And we work out a good solution later? | |||
pmichaud | if we're willing to live with the performance issue, I don't mind if we simply say that Any is true for any object that isn't a Perl6Object | ||
(and Perl6Object also) | |||
jnthn | It's gonna break again as soon as somebody subclasses Object. | ||
pmichaud | I'd remove the test for Junction | 15:02 | |
jnthn | oh, sorry | ||
I mis-understood what you meant. | |||
Yes, that's sane. | |||
pmichaud | okay, I gotta get in line to board | ||
jnthn | I can live with a small performance hit in order to gain correctness. | ||
pmichaud | feel free to experiment with it | ||
jnthn | OK, safe flight! | ||
pmichaud | hopefully it *is* a small performance hit | ||
later | |||
15:20
donaldh left,
donaldh joined
15:21
Whiteknight joined
15:24
KyleHa left,
KyleHa joined
15:29
Chillance_ joined
15:31
M_o_C joined
15:33
hoelzro|home joined,
itz_ joined
15:37
Whiteknight left
15:39
payload1 left
15:41
payload joined
15:42
cognominal left
15:46
Chillance left,
cognominal joined
15:51
StephenPollei left
|
|||
hoelzro|home | is there a good way to print to STDERR in PIR? | 15:57 | |
15:58
Chillance_ left
|
|||
hoelzro|home | ah, I think I found it | 15:58 | |
16:11
jaldhar joined
|
|||
jaldhar | Hello. Question: in the construct for < 1 2 3 > -> $number { do_something($number) } | 16:12 | |
is do_something executed in "parallel" or consecutively? | 16:13 | ||
(hope that made sense) | |||
TimToady | consecutively | ||
you can tell it to operate in parallel however, if the 'for' is in hyper context | |||
my @result = hyper for < 1 2 3 > -> $number { do_something($number) } | 16:14 | ||
that tells the for it can run them in parallel | |||
currently specced, but I'm sure not implemented | |||
jaldhar | I wonder if that is what is happening? My actual do_something function assigns a game piece to an empty space on the board. But sometimes two are ending up in the same space | 16:15 | |
latest rakudo btw | |||
TimToady | is do_something not idempotent? | ||
jaldhar | not using hyper afaict | ||
TimToady | should be doing them sequentially | ||
possibly a scoping problem? | 16:16 | ||
so you're starting over somehow? | |||
16:16
kane___ joined
|
|||
jaldhar | what I do is pick a random space in a repeat ... until (space is empty) | 16:16 | |
TimToady | how does the second iteration learn of the first iteration's results? | ||
what is your board stored in? | 16:17 | ||
jaldhar | an array of spaces | ||
each space has a slot for a piece and an adjacency table | |||
TimToady | declared where and how? | ||
jaldhar | a space is a class and the board has an array of spaces | 16:18 | |
board is also a class | |||
TimToady | how is the board declared, in in what scope? | ||
which declarator are you using? | 16:19 | ||
you might print out .WHICH on the two iterations to see if you're really modifying the same object | 16:20 | ||
16:21
asciiville joined
|
|||
jaldhar | ok. In reference to your previous question, it is class Space{...} and class Board{...} if that's what you're asking. Board includes @!grid of Space | 16:21 | |
oh sorry thats %!grid of Space | 16:22 | ||
TimToady | with 'has', I presume | 16:23 | |
jaldhar | yes | 16:24 | |
TimToady | if you're sure you're dealing with the same Board each time through, then the problem would be on the setting and sticking end, I suppose | ||
asciiville | is there any notion of "forward declaration" in Rakudo/Perl 6? I get invoke() errors unless I change the order of the classes/subclasses in DBDI/Driver/SQLite3.pm | 16:25 | |
TimToady | I doubt that rakudo would be trying to do any concurrency | ||
jaldhar | TimToady: Yes I get the feeling that my logic of assigning to an empty space is wrong somehow. It is definitely the same Board according to .WHICH | 16:26 | |
TimToady | asciiville: a class name has to be predeclared before you can use it, but you can put class Foo {...} with the ... stub | ||
that would serve as a forward declaration | 16:27 | ||
asciiville | ah! much obliged | ||
TimToady | alternately, you can say ::Foo for a not-yet-defined ref | ||
(though not in a declarative context, alas) | |||
we should probably separate those concepts... | 16:28 | ||
but currently, if you need sub foo (::Foo $bar) you have to use class Foo {...} instead | 16:29 | ||
since the ::Foo would mean to capture the type of the $bar parameter en passant | |||
asciiville | the stub sounds good. :) i've been dealing with C, PIR, and Perl 6 to get the SQLite3 working in latest Parrot/Rakudo | ||
TimToady | rakudo probably needs "is also" on the real definition to suppress warnings | 16:30 | |
and "is also" will change to "augment" in rakudo someday | |||
but you shouldn't need either if the original was a stub | |||
jaldhar | aargh I think I figured it out. I have | ||
repeat { $rand = ( 20.rand.int ) + 1; } until %!grid{$rand}.occupant == ''; | 16:31 | ||
asciiville | i'm guessing the stub is much easier than reorganizing classes | ||
jaldhar | but == is numeric isn't it. | ||
TimToady | == is numeric | ||
jaldhar | doh | ||
the occupant slot holds a string | |||
TimToady | jaldhar++ for making progress | ||
@karma jaldhar | 16:32 | ||
lambdabot | jaldhar has a karma of 1 | ||
TimToady | jaldhar++ for having the courage to ask questions too | ||
@karma jaldhar | |||
lambdabot | jaldhar has a karma of 2 | ||
jaldhar | its so helpful to just talk it out sometimes. I must have stared at that code 100 times before and glossed over the == | 16:33 | |
TimToady | the == ought to have been giving you warnings, I think | ||
but perhaps not, depending on if we think '' is a valid representation of 0 | 16:34 | ||
maybe it's something the compiler could notice | 16:35 | ||
jaldhar | I think it would be a good idea | 16:37 | |
hoelzro|home | how can I test if a pmc is null in PIR? is it just unless null mypmc goto some_label? | 16:43 | |
TimToady | ENOKLOO # not a PIR expert | 16:44 | |
TimToady is not even a PIR amateur... | |||
hoelzro|home | ugh | 16:45 | |
I just realized my stupid mistake | |||
s/unless/if/ | 16:46 | ||
16:48
Patterner left
|
|||
pmichaud | greetings from San Diego :-) | 16:50 | |
16:51
ZuLuuuuuu left,
Whiteknight joined
16:53
Psyche^ joined,
Psyche^ is now known as Patterner
|
|||
TimToady | ah yes, one of the many SWA "hubs" :) | 16:54 | |
pmichaud | it's quite a contrast from SJC | ||
SJC has a new terminal open, which is a very long hallway and tons of space between the gates | |||
TimToady | always fun landing over the hill in SD | ||
oh, were you in the new terminal B? | 16:55 | ||
pmichaud | San Diego has 12 gates crowded into a small circle, with no room for everyone here :-) | ||
TimToady: apparently. Someone next to me remarked that he flew out every week and this was "all new to him" | |||
okay, time to board | |||
TimToady | peddle hard | ||
pmichaud | see you later/tomorrow | ||
dalek | kudo: 240b984 | (Kyle Hasselbacher)++ | Test.pm: report expected and actual results after "is" test failure |
17:03 | |
17:03
wayland76 left
17:06
kane___ left
17:10
pmurias joined
17:13
FurnaceBoy joined,
kane___ joined
|
|||
pugs_svn | r27724 | moritz++ | [t/spec] test for RT #67876 | 17:17 | |
r27725 | lwall++ | [STD] hide "multisig" from user | 17:18 | ||
17:24
frew_ joined
17:26
cbk joined
17:27
sri_kraih joined
17:44
dukeleto left
17:45
fridim_ left
17:47
FurnaceBoy is now known as pearshaped,
pearshaped is now known as FurnaceBoy
18:05
sri_kraih left,
sri_kraih joined
|
|||
pugs_svn | r27726 | lwall++ | [S05] permanently reserve ; within regex as indicating missing terminator | 18:09 | |
pmurias | TimToady: why do we reserve the semicolon? | 18:10 | |
pugs_svn | r27727 | lwall++ | [STD] more humanization of error messages | 18:12 | |
TimToady | as a statement separator, it's a very good spot to figure out that someone didn't terminate their regex properly | ||
and it was already an "unrecognized metacharacter" | 18:13 | ||
this just let's us give a more useful message in the case that they actually did leave off the terminator | |||
18:13
jauaor left
|
|||
TimToady | *lets | 18:13 | |
I can probably give a better message for /;/ though | 18:19 | ||
18:28
fridim_ joined
18:29
sri_kraih_ joined
18:33
edpratomo joined
18:35
arejay left
18:36
arejay joined
|
|||
pugs_svn | r27728 | kyle++ | [t/spec] Check semicolon in rx | 18:43 | |
18:44
sri_kraih left
18:47
tann joined
|
|||
pmurias | TimToady: does reserving something as none existent actually mean anything (rather than a hint how a good error message should be implemented) | 18:49 | |
colomon | Hi all. Any idea why when /^(\d+)\-(\d+)/ { @entities_needed.push: $0..$1; } | 19:03 | |
would get an error message of Multiple Dispatch: No suitable candidate found for 'cmp', with signature 'PP->I' in method Range::true (src/gen_setting.pm:1650) ? | 19:04 | ||
hoelzro|home | pmichaud: I got the REPL working with a Perl6::Compiler instance, not just Perl6::Compiler =) | ||
jnthn | colomon: Maybe rakudobug...does +$0..+$1 work any better? | 19:06 | |
jnthn bbs - dinner | 19:07 | ||
19:11
masak joined
|
|||
masak | ahoj, adventurers! | 19:12 | |
你们好马? | |||
er, wrong 'ma3'. should've been 吗. | |||
Su-Shee | thank, very well. ;) learning chinese? | 19:13 | |
masak | Su-Shee: constantly. | ||
colomon | jnthn: Yes, that does indeed make it work. rakduobug? | ||
hoelzro|home | masak: I only saw hao3, and judging from your statement about ma, I assume you asked 'ni men hao ma?' I'm quite well, thanks =) | ||
masak | hoelzro|home: bad fonts, eh? :) | 19:14 | |
19:16
mkfort_ is now known as mkfort,
Front_slash left
|
|||
masak | I think that if Perl 6 is to be inspired by something in Python, it should be something like this: docs.python.org/library/itertools.html | 19:17 | |
providing this in a module is fine by me. | |||
19:18
M_o_C left
19:19
mberends joined
19:20
donaldh left,
donaldh joined
|
|||
masak | moritz_: what's that shrieking yellow arrow thing in the STD.pm parse error output? the idea is sound, I think, but could you make it another colour? | 19:20 | |
19:21
mberends left
|
|||
jnthn | colomon: Yes, rakudobug | 19:21 | |
KyleHa | Is that a given/when bug or a matching bug or what (i.e., where should the test go)? | 19:22 | |
jnthn | KyleHa: range | ||
KyleHa | Thanks! | ||
jnthn | masak: I think the point is to aid people who are red/green colorblind. | 19:23 | |
masak | jnthn: by blinding the rest of us? :) | ||
jnthn | Right. It's parse error socialism in action! | 19:24 | |
masak | I'm happy with any variant of yellow with less brightness in it. | ||
colomon | KyleHa: Are you planning on adding a test case for it? | ||
masak | it shrieks less against the light grey brackground, but it still shrieks. | ||
19:25
mberends joined
|
|||
masak | @array .= 'say something, lambdabot' | 19:25 | |
lambdabot | Swab the deck! | ||
masak | :) | ||
KyleHa | colomon: Yeah, probably. | ||
masak | KyleHa: did you submit an RT ticket? | 19:27 | |
colomon | KyleHa: Can you walk me through how, so I can do it myself in the future? :) | ||
KyleHa | I have not submitted a ticket. | ||
I was expecting colomon to submit the ticket. | |||
colomon: You have a pugs commit bit? | 19:28 | ||
colomon | I do, from the pre-history of pugs. | ||
masak | ah. colomon: go for it. :) | ||
colomon | Not sure I still remember the password. | ||
19:28
kane___ left
|
|||
KyleHa | OK, so, I have my repo checkout, and I'm editing t/spec/S03-operators/range.t | 19:29 | |
colomon | Have the file up in my editor to follow along. | 19:30 | |
19:30
szabgab left
|
|||
KyleHa | I go to the end, and I usually operate in a new block with a comment before it that says what ticket number I'm testing. | 19:30 | |
# RT #1234 \n { \n } | 19:31 | ||
At this point, I'm hoping you know how to write tests. 8-) | |||
masak | (and the comment causes a 'new tests' mail to be automatically sent, right?) | ||
colomon | Actually, I was in the process of learning how to do that when I stumbled on the bug. | ||
KyleHa | masak: Actually it's the commit message that triggers the email. | 19:32 | |
masak | aha. | ||
colomon | (In the Perl 5 / Perl 6 context, I mean.) | ||
masak | I love those mails. | ||
KyleHa | OK, in the briefest terms... | ||
You set up some condition and then the actual "test" is written with ok() and friends. | 19:33 | ||
ok( $true_condition, 'description of the test' ) | |||
ok( 1 == 1, 'the == operator works' ); | |||
colomon | Or nok ($false_condition, 'desc'), right? | ||
KyleHa | Yes. | ||
There are lots of variants, but you can do everything with ok() if that's all you know. 8-) | 19:34 | ||
19:35
szabgab joined
|
|||
KyleHa | Another good one: is( $got, $expected, 'got what i expected); | 19:35 | |
So, I write my tests in the file... | |||
When I'm done, I count the number of tests I've added and adjust the 'plan' line at the top of the file. | 19:37 | ||
19:37
olaf225 joined
|
|||
KyleHa | I added two, and it says "plan 80" right now, so I change it to "plan 82". | 19:37 | |
Then I try running the test file with my tests added, and it's time to debug. 8-) | 19:38 | ||
19:38
lumi_ left
|
|||
masak | KyleHa: so you haven't tested the new plan-less feature? no more counting tests! | 19:38 | |
KyleHa | in my rakudo dir, I do: | ||
colomon | So something like my $a = 1; my $b = 3; ok($a..$b == 1..3, "range limits are variables"); ? | ||
19:39
meppl left
|
|||
jnthn | Don't think == is quite what you want there. | 19:39 | |
colomon | Thought it might not be. | ||
masak | colomon: better to build the range object and examine .from, .to etc. | ||
KyleHa | That's the right idea, but I don't think you can use == to compare two ranges. | ||
jnthn | is($a..$b, 1..3, 'comment') may be fine | ||
masak | though it does string comparison, methinks. | ||
KyleHa | masak: I think plans are a good idea whenever possible, but I'm glad I can go without now when I need to. 8-) | ||
jnthn | rakudo: say 1..3 | 19:40 | |
p6eval | rakudo 240b98: OUTPUT«123» | ||
jnthn | Should work out OK | ||
colomon | Also, I'm not sure if the bug is triggered just by the use of variables, or if it was specifically the pattern match variables that were the problem. | ||
jnthn | It'll be the pattern match vars, surely. | ||
rakudo: my $a = 1; my $b = 2; say $a..$b; | |||
p6eval | rakudo 240b98: OUTPUT«12» | ||
masak | KyleHa: de gustibus non disputandum est. :) I don't think I'll write a plan ever again now that I don't have to. | ||
KyleHa | colomon: Usually I start with what I know triggers the bug and then try to eliminate extra stuff. | ||
colomon | Fair enough. Though I don't see any tests for ranges with normal variables. | 19:41 | |
jnthn | rakudo: "1 3" ~~ /(\d) \s (\d)/; say $0..$1; | ||
p6eval | rakudo 240b98: OUTPUT«Multiple Dispatch: No suitable candidate found for 'cmp', with signature 'PP->I'in method Range::true (src/gen_setting.pm:1674)called from Main (/tmp/mb9wc22e4L:2)» | ||
jnthn | There she is. | ||
colomon | yup. | ||
19:42
lumi_ joined
|
|||
masak | interesting error. | 19:42 | |
guess there's no way for a range to know whether to numify or stringify. | 19:43 | ||
19:44
nbrown left
|
|||
colomon | masak: Maybe not a bug, then? | 19:45 | |
KyleHa | rakudo: '1 3' ~~ /(\d)\s(\d)/; say 'alive'; | ||
p6eval | rakudo 240b98: OUTPUT«alive» | ||
KyleHa | rakudo: '1 3' ~~ /(\d)\s(\d)/; my $range = $0..$1; say 'alive'; | 19:46 | |
p6eval | rakudo 240b98: OUTPUT«alive» | ||
KyleHa | akudo: '1 3' ~~ /(\d)\s(\d)/; my $range = $0..$1; say $range; say 'alive'; | ||
Oops. | |||
rakudo: '1 3' ~~ /(\d)\s(\d)/; my $range = $0..$1; say $range; say 'alive'; | 19:47 | ||
p6eval | rakudo 240b98: OUTPUT«Multiple Dispatch: No suitable candidate found for 'cmp', with signature 'PP->I'in method Range::true (src/gen_setting.pm:1674)called from Main (/tmp/sffH2b5C27:2)» | ||
masak | colomon: I think at least the error could be more awesome. | ||
pugs_svn | r27729 | kyle++ | [t/spec] Test bug from colomon++ | 19:53 | |
19:55
frew_ left
|
|||
jnthn | rakudo: my $a = '1'; my $b = '3'; $a..$b | 19:55 | |
p6eval | rakudo 240b98: ( no output ) | ||
jnthn | rakudo: '1 3' ~~ /(\d)\s(\d)/; say $0.WHAT; | 19:56 | |
p6eval | rakudo 240b98: OUTPUT«Match()» | ||
jnthn | Ah | ||
colomon | KyleHa: Interesting patch. Will ask more questions about it in a sec (ordering dinner with wife now). | ||
jnthn | Range dunno what to do with a match object. | ||
masak | exactly. | 19:57 | |
19:57
hoelzro|home left
|
|||
masak | more exactly, range dunno how to cmp it when printing. | 19:57 | |
KyleHa | rakudo: '1 3' ~~ /(\d)\s(\d)/; my $range = $0..$1; "$range"; | 19:58 | |
p6eval | rakudo 240b98: OUTPUT«Multiple Dispatch: No suitable candidate found for 'cmp', with signature 'PP->I'in method Range::true (src/gen_setting.pm:1674)called from method Range::Str (src/gen_setting.pm:1678)called from Main (/tmp/rKyRRxqGbs:2)» | ||
19:59
hoelzro left
|
|||
jnthn | masak: well, when ranging I guess | 19:59 | |
erm | |||
when looking for the next value I mean | 20:00 | ||
masak | right. | ||
or it might be for checking whether the range is empty or not. | |||
rakudo: say 1..3 | |||
p6eval | rakudo 240b98: OUTPUT«123» | ||
jnthn | Well | ||
masak | jnthn: or it might be what you said. | ||
:) | |||
jnthn | When it gets the next element it needs to know if there is one ;-) | ||
masak | aye. | 20:01 | |
jnthn | I think we're both saying different levels of specificity of the same thing. :-) | ||
masak | or I'm just wrong. :) | ||
colomon | KyleHa: (Wife is being slow making up her mind.) I think I understand everything from the tests except the #?rakudo bits. Special code to indicate todos and skips? Does it modify the next line / test / ok ? | 20:04 | |
KyleHa | Yes. | ||
Those are called fudges. | |||
The spec tests are supposed to be run by any implementation. | 20:05 | ||
Fudging is how we indicate that a particular Perl 6 needs to regard a particular test differently than how it's written. | |||
masak | KyleHa++ | ||
KyleHa | If you look around enough, you'll see fudges for Pugs too. (#?pugs todo 'feature') | 20:07 | |
masak | and mildew, nowadays! | ||
colomon | KyleHa++ indeed. | ||
pmurias | The motivation for fudging is that an implementation can run a part of the test file withought being able to handle the whole of it | ||
colomon | Sure, makes great sense. | 20:08 | |
KyleHa | We 'todo' the ones that fail and 'skip' the ones that crash. 8-) | ||
masak | why is 'say' both an Any-method and a sub, while 'warn' is just a sub? | 20:09 | |
colomon | Got to place the dinner order now, then should I send the bug to RT and stick the RT number in range.t? | ||
KyleHa | Feel free! | ||
jnthn | masak: Maybe argumentless warn is valid? | 20:10 | |
rakudo: warn | |||
p6eval | rakudo 240b98: OUTPUT«Warning! Something's wrong.» | ||
jnthn | rakudo++ | ||
masak | jnthn: I don't see why that should prevent warn from also being a method. | 20:11 | |
jnthn | You could have it as a method too | ||
Not sure I see the usecase. | |||
masak | today I found myself saying something like '.perl.warn for @things' | ||
jnthn | I mean, warn "oh noes it's a brussel sprout" reads much more naturally than the method form. | ||
Ah, OK. | 20:12 | ||
Hmm | |||
masak | it felt natural. | ||
jnthn | Yeah, you're right, I do concede it looks natural there. | ||
masak | I think of warn as a say to STDERR. | ||
jnthn | It's a bit more than that. | ||
But aj, I see where you're coming from. | |||
masak | dobrze. | ||
jnthn | Well, guess it's permission or forgiveness. ;-) | 20:13 | |
20:14
payload left
|
|||
masak loves forgiveness | 20:14 | ||
YAY! I got the first significant test in Hitomi to pass! \o/ | 20:15 | ||
Hang on, I'll make y'all a gist. | 20:16 | ||
gist.github.com/154937 | 20:18 | ||
jnthn can reacall what hitomi = beautiful, but has already forgotten what it does :-) | |||
masak | not just 'beautiful', but doubly beautiful. | ||
peek at the test to see what it does! :) | 20:19 | ||
jnthn | Ah, templating engine. | ||
masak | yes, SAX-based, and with full Perl 6 expression evaluation. | ||
er, eventually. | |||
jnthn | ${$var} and $var are basically the same thing? | ||
masak | yes. | ||
but the former allows for whole expressions. | |||
jnthn | eh, OK | ||
Full Perl 6 expressions? | 20:20 | ||
masak | aye. | ||
jnthn | Interesting. | ||
Though can lead to an impure view. | |||
masak | there's always that problem, I guess. | ||
jnthn has a homegrown web framework that just doesn't allow embedded code in the view | |||
Sometimes I wish for it, but usually I find it's (a) a sign I'm putting the logic int he wrong place or (b) a sign that the template language is lacking something. | 20:21 | ||
masak | well, it's not meant for putting logic in the wrong place. | 20:22 | |
actually, I haven't fully grokked the Genshi evaluation engine yet, so I don't know how far the power extends. | |||
but I think it's pretty complete. | |||
jnthn | *nod* | ||
Oh, sure, it's never the intention it'll be used that way, just a risk. | 20:23 | ||
Just 'cus something can be mis-used doesn't make it bad, though. | |||
masak | I believe more in admonishing people in the usage instructions than in reducing the power for everybody. | ||
jnthn | Aye, and that's probably a more Perl-ish way of looking at things. | ||
masak | but hooray, the test passes! | ||
jnthn | Yes! :-) | ||
jnthn would be curious to see the implementation at some point | 20:24 | ||
TimToady | I take it the ${$var} is done by something else, because it's certainly no legal Perl 6 | ||
*not | |||
masak | TimToady: only the thing inside the {} is Perl 6 code. the rest is ordinary text in an XML document. | 20:25 | |
jnthn: the implementation is online, in the Web.pm repo. it weighs 10k right now, most of which I've written in the past few days. | 20:26 | ||
jnthn | found it | ||
masak | I think it's the most involved Perl 6 I've written so far, not due to any advanced tricks, but due to its size and complexity. | ||
jnthn: hold on, I'll push the latest changes. | |||
pushed. | 20:27 | ||
now, time to blog. | 20:28 | ||
jnthn | yaymasakblogpost! | ||
Hitomi/Markup.pm has a BUILD that looks like it'll get a lot shorter once $!foo parameters are implemented... | 20:29 | ||
masak | TimToady: I elected ${} rather than just {}, because I think the risk is too high for false positives with the latter. | ||
jnthn: aye. | |||
I miss those sometimes. | |||
jnthn | Clean, neat code though. :-) | ||
masak | thank you. :) | ||
Genshi++, that code is often a joy to read. | 20:30 | ||
I don't know Python nearly well enough, but that doesn't seem to matter much. | |||
moritz_: Rakudo still isn't announced on use.perl.org. | 20:33 | ||
moritz_ | masak: that's unfortunate. | 20:34 | |
masak | moritz_: 'unfortunate' is a good description for a lot of things on use.perl.org. | ||
moritz_ | use.perl.org/submit.pl?op=list | 20:36 | |
was it wrong to submit it for "News" and not for "Mainpage"? | 20:37 | ||
masak | oh. it was accepted, but not onto the main page. | ||
moritz_: well, I have no idea where it ended up now. :/ | |||
moritz_ | no, it's still "Pending" | ||
masak | maybe that means 'rejected' in some language. a newer one was accepted. | 20:38 | |
moritz_ | well, maybe I should then submit it at least to my journal. | 20:39 | |
use.perl.org/~moritz/journal/39350 it is now. | 20:42 | ||
jnthn | Writing a blog post was one of the many things I planned to do today. :-/ | 20:43 | |
Dealing with my twisting pile of Rakudo diffs was another. | |||
20:44
jaldhar left
20:55
wolverian joined
20:58
edpratomo left
|
|||
pugs_svn | r27730 | moritz++ | [t/spec] avoid segfault at test end by fudging a previously TODOed test for Rakudo | 21:04 | |
moritz_ | KyleHa: it might be worthwile to think about how to create a list of tickets that don't have tests associated yet | 21:05 | |
21:06
kane___ joined
|
|||
tann | rakudo: say caller(0).perl; | 21:06 | |
p6eval | rakudo 240b98: OUTPUT«Could not find non-existent sub caller» | ||
moritz_ | the right thing to do would probably be a tag test_available in RT | 21:07 | |
Tene | Where are the specs for caller() ? | 21:08 | |
moritz_ | I'd guess S04 | ||
no, it's S06 | 21:09 | ||
=head2 The C<context> and C<caller> functions | |||
pmichaud: as RT admin for Perl 6, can you create a new tag? (Tests_available would be very useful) | 21:10 | ||
21:10
szabgab left
|
|||
moritz_ | (the other tags seem to be CamelCased, so TestAvail or so might be tter) | 21:11 | |
better even | |||
masak | whoa. this is going to be a longish post. | 21:12 | |
tann | rakudo: class C { }; my C $o; | 21:13 | |
p6eval | rakudo 240b98: ( no output ) | ||
jnthn cheers on masak | 21:14 | ||
21:14
szabgab joined
|
|||
tann | std: class C { method new(Int $i) { $i } }; new C 1; | 21:17 | |
p6eval | std 27729: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===Obsolete use of C++ constructor syntax; in Perl 6 please use method call syntax instead at /tmp/UcoqydMSDr line 1:------> C { method new(Int $i) { $i } }; new C ⏏1;FAILED 00:03 40m» | ||
tann | std: class C { method new(Int $i) { $i } }; new C: 1; | ||
p6eval | std 27729: OUTPUT«ok 00:03 42m» | ||
jnthn | It even knows to blame C++. ;-) | 21:18 | |
jnthn wonders if the "SORRY!" will become annoying over time. | |||
It's nicer than ERROR though. :-) | 21:19 | ||
21:19
meppl joined,
the_irrational_1 left,
the_irrational_1 joined,
mberends left
|
|||
tann | rakudo: class C { method new(Int $i) { $i } }; my $o = new C: 1; say $o.perl; | 21:20 | |
p6eval | rakudo 240b98: OUTPUT«Statement not terminated properly at line 2, near ": 1; say "in Main (src/gen_setting.pm:3343)» | 21:21 | |
jnthn | Don't think Rakudo knows that syntax yet. | ||
pugs_svn | r27731 | colomon++ | Tag test with RT number. | 21:22 | |
moritz_ | "new C" is wrong. | 21:23 | |
tann | rakudo: class C { }; say C.perl; | ||
p6eval | rakudo 240b98: OUTPUT«C» | ||
21:24
r0bby joined
|
|||
tann | rakudo: class C { }; say C.WHAT; | 21:24 | |
p6eval | rakudo 240b98: OUTPUT«C()» | ||
jnthn | Ah, yes. | 21:25 | |
Though say $a: "oh hai" probably should work and doesn't. | |||
std: say $a: "oh hai" | |||
rakudo: say $a: "oh hai" | |||
p6eval | std 27730: OUTPUT«Potential difficulties: Variable $a is not predeclared at /tmp/hS3m394wVt line 1:------> say $a⏏: "oh hai"ok 00:04 39m» | ||
rakudo 240b98: OUTPUT«Statement not terminated properly at line 2, near ": \"oh hai\""in Main (src/gen_setting.pm:3343)» | |||
jnthn | Aye | ||
mkelly32 | so, i'm curious... is there anything about perl6 that people would consider a "killer" feature? some single thing that'll make people wnat to switch to it from perl5? | 21:27 | |
i've only started digesting some docs on perl6 | |||
tann | rakudo: class C { }; multi sub f(C $x) { 'C' }; multi sub f(Int $x) { 'Int' }; multi sub f { 'nada' }; say f(Int); say f(C); say f(Num); | ||
p6eval | rakudo 240b98: OUTPUT«IntCNo applicable candidates found to dispatch to for 'f'in Main (/tmp/Fbc3UGTy2d:2)» | ||
moritz_ | mkelly32: the regular expressions/grammars | 21:28 | |
tann | pugs: class C { }; multi sub f(C $x) { 'C' }; multi sub f(Int $x) { 'Int' }; multi sub f { 'nada' }; say f(Int); say f(C); say f(Num); | ||
p6eval | pugs: OUTPUT«nadaCnada» | ||
21:29
Whiteknight left
|
|||
mkelly32 | and, if i wanted to test those sort of things out right now... would rakudo be the implementation to try it with? | 21:29 | |
moritz_ | mkelly32: yes | ||
mkelly32 | moritz_: ok, thanks | ||
moritz_ | mkelly32: rakudo.org/how-to-get-rakudo is a good start for obtaining it | 21:30 | |
mkelly32 | yeah, i've got it building | ||
i think it was failinga spec test for me | |||
forget which one right now, not at that machine | |||
i also was trying out the heredoc syntax i saw mentioned on the wikibook... something like q:to/END/... but it wasn't liking that. | |||
moritz_ | there are two files of which we expect "Non-zero wait status" | 21:31 | |
yes, heredocs are not yet implemented | |||
mkelly32 | ok | ||
what's the reason for the change from the <<END syntax? | |||
TimToady | to allow << a b c >> as a synonym for « a b c » | 21:32 | |
and to switch to a syntax where you could add modifiers easily | |||
mkelly32 | what sort of other modifiers would there be? | 21:33 | |
TimToady | such as to determine what will or will not interpolate | ||
mkelly32 | ah, interesting. | ||
so, say, not interpolating [email@hidden.address] into something like "foobar baz bam.net" | 21:34 | ||
TimToady | that's already handled by default in p6 | ||
since @example won't interpolate without a [] afte rit | |||
after it | |||
mkelly32 | ah, ok. | ||
good. | |||
if it werent' for syntax hilighting, that would've bit me many times | 21:35 | ||
TimToady | it's really the sum total of lots of little killer features that adds up | ||
21:35
payload joined
|
|||
mkelly32 | i'm also guessing that optimization isn't coming until it's feature-complete, correct? | 21:35 | |
21:35
Su-Shee left
|
|||
TimToady | it's becoming more of a priority as time goes on | 21:36 | |
but hasn't been till now | |||
moritz_ | parrot (the virtual machine on which Rakudo runs) wants to focus more on speed in the coming year | ||
and Rakudo will benefit from that, of course | |||
mkelly32 | yeah. | 21:37 | |
well. i guess i'll keep an eye on things, then. | |||
would there be any use in me doing regular smoke tests of rakudo? or do you have enough of that already? | |||
moritz_ | we tend to have enough testers on linux, and not enough on any other platform | 21:39 | |
mkelly32 | hrm, want some fbsd testing then? | ||
moritz_ | yes. | ||
mkelly32 | k. do you have any sorta suggested smoking script/setup somewhere? | 21:40 | |
moritz_ | the parrot folks have a cool automated smoke collection system named "smolder" | ||
you automatically submit a report when you run 'make smolder_test' in parrot | |||
it would be great to have that (or something similar) set up for rakudo too | 21:41 | ||
mkelly32 | well, that'd require me to actually do more than a 5 minute cronjob :p | ||
and my plate is kinda full right now. | |||
TimToady | you'll have to be very careful then, because hacking on this stuff is highly addictive | 21:42 | |
21:42
maja_ joined,
olaf225 left
21:43
snearch_ joined
|
|||
mkelly32 | so. git pull && perl Configure.pl --gen-parrot && make && make test && make spectest should be sufficient, right? | 21:47 | |
(need to send it somewhere w/ a pass/fail subject i guess) | 21:48 | ||
21:49
snearch_ is now known as snearch
|
|||
moritz_ | right | 21:49 | |
currently we have no list for these kind of reports | 21:50 | ||
bed& | |||
mkelly32 | well. i could probably just throw some simple webpage together w/ them. but, that'll just have to go on my TODO for sometime | ||
TimToady | you could use the webpage apparatus that was built for pugs | 21:51 | |
mkelly32 | haven't seen that. was thinking something like cpantesters, only less shiny | 21:52 | |
TimToady | see the smoke target in pugs/Makefile | ||
assuming you have the pugs repo handy | |||
mkelly32 | not right now. | ||
svn.pugscode.org/pugs/ ? | 21:53 | ||
TimToady | that's also where we store all the spec tests | ||
21:53
snearch left
|
|||
TimToady | so if you want to whack on those, a commit bit is very easy to acquire | 21:53 | |
mkelly32 | yeah, but make spectest checks that out for me | ||
21:54
maja__ left
|
|||
TimToady | all the specs are in the pugs repo as well | 21:55 | |
if you want a pugs commit bit, we can get you one in about a minute | |||
mkelly32 | i'll wait on that till i have a useful something to commit | 21:56 | |
TimToady | oh, where's your sense of adventure :P | ||
jnthn | TimToady: You're meant to give out the commit bit before warning about the addictiveness. ;-) | 21:57 | |
TimToady | oops | ||
21:58
hoelzro joined
|
|||
jnthn | TimToady: Are you not making YAPC::Asia this year? | 21:58 | |
masak | TimToady: oh hai, did you see the discussion on :$!bar ? I can haz this syntax? kthxbai. | 21:59 | |
TimToady | as far as I know, I don't have an invite yet | ||
jnthn | Ah, ok | ||
TimToady | you already have it | ||
masak | \o/ | ||
.jump for @joy | |||
TimToady | std: :$^bar | ||
p6eval | std 27731: OUTPUT«ok 00:02 36m» | ||
TimToady | std: :$*bar | 22:00 | |
22:00
snearch joined
|
|||
p6eval | std 27731: OUTPUT«ok 00:02 36m» | 22:00 | |
jnthn | "torment the implementors" ;-) | ||
(akshually, shouldn't be so hard...) | |||
masak was just going to say that | |||
jnthn | masak: Feel free to file it as a todo ticket if you didn't already. | 22:01 | |
masak | jnthn: filed a ticket the other day. | 22:02 | |
jnthn | If I need some light relief from beating traits, the metamodel and the multi-dispatcher into shape, I may just do it. | ||
masak | not sure it was TODO, though, but it touches on exactly this. | ||
jnthn | That's fine. | ||
jnthn is at an annoying point of discovering a couple of things that were broken, and in their brokenness making other things Just Work. | 22:03 | ||
22:03
snearch left
|
|||
jnthn | So I either need to fix the lot, or we regeress for a short while on something. | 22:03 | |
22:03
fridim_ is now known as esil_bot
|
|||
masak | or work in a branch for a while. | 22:05 | |
22:05
esil_bot is now known as fridim_
22:06
to_char joined
|
|||
jnthn | True, true... | 22:07 | |
22:07
to_char left
|
|||
jnthn | Either way, it's a bit to untangle. | 22:08 | |
Plus I'm seeing more and more stuff that I want to clean up as I go. | |||
Probably a good sign that things are somehow starting to fall into place in my head. | |||
22:12
icwiener-_- joined
|
|||
hoelzro | BUILD *is* the construction initialization submethod, right? | 22:12 | |
jnthn | Yes. | 22:13 | |
hoelzro | I can't seem to get it to work | ||
masak | works fine here. | 22:14 | |
hoelzro | I'll play around for a bit | ||
if I still can't get it working, I'll ask again | |||
jnthn | rakudo: class Foo { submethod BUILD { say "called" } }; Foo.new | 22:15 | |
p6eval | rakudo 240b98: OUTPUT«called» | ||
hoelzro | jnthn: that's what I'm doing | 22:16 | |
well, something like that | |||
also, do I have to do submethod BUILD(self:) { ... } to get access to $self? | 22:17 | ||
jnthn | hoelzro: Well, if you want it in $self | 22:18 | |
22:18
the_irrational_1 left
|
|||
jnthn | hoelzro: But you can use the self keyword | 22:18 | |
hoelzro | ah, just self, not $self? | ||
22:18
the_irrational_1 joined
|
|||
jnthn | Right. | 22:18 | |
hoelzro | ah ok =) | ||
TimToady | unless you declare ($self:) | 22:19 | |
jnthn | Sure. You can declare ($worreva:) | ||
Or ($p6l_argued_for_weeks:) | |||
hoelzro | ah, ok | ||
haha | |||
TimToady | or ($私:) | 22:20 | |
hoelzro | ok, so BUILD worked in one example... | ||
ok | 22:22 | ||
masak | use.perl.org/~masak/journal/39351 | ||
jnthn | \o/ | 22:23 | |
masak | that was a lot to write in one go. | ||
but I also feel it's the greatest Web.pm post so far. | 22:24 | ||
hoelzro | this doesn't work: class OnlineRepl is Perl6::Compiler { submethod BUILD { say 'hello'; } } OnlineRepl.new; | ||
other than that, BUILD works fine | |||
masak | hoelzro: :) | ||
jnthn groans | 22:25 | ||
I can guess why too | |||
hoelzro | jnthn: why's that? | ||
masak | answer contains "Parrot" somehow... | ||
KyleHa | Regarding RT tags, I had been thinking 'tested' and 'testable' for "has a test" and "could have a test but doesn't". | ||
jnthn | rakudo: Perl6::Compiler.^parents>>.say | ||
22:25
icwiener_ left
|
|||
p6eval | rakudo 240b98: OUTPUT«Method '!.^' not found for invocant of class ''» | 22:25 | |
jnthn | ...yeah ouch. | ||
masak | o_O | ||
jnthn | rakudo: Perl6::Compiler.HOW.parents(Perl6::Compiler)>>.say | 22:26 | |
p6eval | rakudo 240b98: OUTPUT«Method 'say' not found for invocant of class ''» | ||
masak | rakudo: say Perl6::Compiler.WHAT | ||
jnthn | rakudo: say Perl6::Compiler.HOW.parents(Perl6::Compiler) | ||
p6eval | rakudo 240b98: OUTPUT«Perl6::Compiler()» | ||
rakudo 240b98: OUTPUT«PCT::HLLCompiler()» | |||
masak | rakudo: say Perl6::Compiler.PARROT | ||
p6eval | rakudo 240b98: OUTPUT«Method 'PARROT' not found for invocant of class ''» | ||
hoelzro | so...what should I do? | ||
write a bug report? new test for that? | |||
masak | hoelzro: yay! | ||
jnthn | rakudo: class OnlineRepl is Perl6::Compiler { submethod BUILD { say 'hello'; } } OnlineRepl.new; | 22:27 | |
p6eval | rakudo 240b98: OUTPUT«Statement not terminated properly at line 2, near "OnlineRepl"in Main (src/gen_setting.pm:3343)» | ||
jnthn | rakudo: class OnlineRepl is Perl6::Compiler { submethod BUILD { say 'hello'; } }; OnlineRepl.new; | ||
p6eval | rakudo 240b98: ( no output ) | ||
hoelzro | masak: yay for what? | ||
masak | hoelzro: bugs and tests. keep'em coming! | ||
jnthn | rakudo: class OnlineRepl is Perl6::Compiler is Any { submethod BUILD { say 'hello'; } }; OnlineRepl.new; | ||
p6eval | rakudo 240b98: OUTPUT«hello» | ||
hoelzro | masak: you got it! | ||
masak | hoelzro: oh, and jnthn just found a workaround for ya. :) | ||
hoelzro | jnthn: thanks | ||
jnthn | hoelzro: See above workaround, but also plz we can haz ticket kplzthnxbai. | ||
hoelzro | jnthn: coming in right now | ||
jnthn still hasn't got past the bible quote in masak++'s post yet | 22:28 | ||
masak | *lol* | ||
hoelzro | setting up a bug reporting account right now | 22:30 | |
jnthn | masak: "Also, the thing doing the serialization is called XHTMLSerializer, but there are a number of those, including HTMLSerializer which takes the same event stream but produces impeccable HTML 4.01." | 22:31 | |
hoelzro | and the tests are in SVN, right? | ||
jnthn | masak: Will it also be able to automatically html-encode stuff, or some similar mechanism? | ||
masak | jnthn: html-encode? | ||
you mean escape stuff? | |||
hoelzro | also, do I need certain privileges to create a bug report? I'm logged in, but I don't see any way to create a ticket... | 22:32 | |
masak | hoelzro: [email@hidden.address] | ||
hoelzro: the only way to report is by email. | 22:33 | ||
hoelzro | ah ok | ||
jnthn | masak: Yeah | ||
masak: Or rather, how much has security stuff - in this case against XSS - been thought about when doing Web.pm related things? | 22:34 | ||
masak | jnthn: yes, escaping will done by default. there's a way to pass in things, saying "I know this is already markup, so no need to escape this". it's quite nice. | ||
jnthn | OK. Secure *by default* is what I was hoping to hear. | ||
Excellent. | |||
masak | jnthn: there are XSS filters in Genshi. all part of this filtering mechanism I mention in the post. | ||
masak really, really likes the example Genshi sets | 22:35 | ||
22:35
icwiener-_- left
|
|||
pugs_svn | r27732 | lwall++ | [STD] make perl6-projects more welcoming to all civil people | 22:35 | |
jnthn is glad there'll be more lolbible | 22:36 | ||
jnthn doesn't even know what "various molecular aspects of metabolism" means ;-) | |||
hoelzro | bug report away! | ||
jnthn | hoelzro++ # thanks. | 22:37 | |
hoelzro | =) | ||
test coming up | |||
um...where should I put the test? | |||
masak | jnthn: that's one reason I decided not to switch. :) | ||
jnthn: here's one example :) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citric_acid_cycle | 22:38 | ||
(maybe I should like to that for extra effect) | 22:39 | ||
jnthn | hoelzro: moaybe in S12-class/inheritnce.t | ||
hoelzro | mkay | ||
TimToady | hoelzro: do you have a pugs commit bit? | ||
KyleHa | Maybe S12-construction/BUILD.t | ||
hoelzro | are the tests in the Rakudo repo, or somewhere else? | ||
TimToady: I do | |||
at least, I should | |||
jnthn | masak: That diagram is liek omfg | ||
hoelzro | last time I worked on Pugs was like 2 years ago =( | 22:40 | |
masak | hoelzro: in the Pugs repo, in t/spec | ||
hoelzro | mkay | ||
TimToady | do you still have a repo image? | ||
I can resend the commit bit if you've forgotten your password | |||
masak | jnthn: your body does that billions of times every day. :) | ||
jnthn | KyleHa: Yes, better. | ||
hoelzro | TimToady: I'll try to remember, I'll let you know if I need it =) | 22:41 | |
jnthn | masak: meh, no wonder it gets tired by evening ;-) | ||
masak | :) | ||
jnthn | Eurgh. | 22:43 | |
jnthn hates having a cold | |||
hoelzro | if I add a new file, will it automatically get run? | ||
jnthn | Hopefully I have vaguely more motivation to do something useful tomorrow... | ||
hoelzro: For Rakudo to run it, it needs to go into t/spectest.data in the Rakudo repo | 22:44 | ||
hoelzro | mkay | ||
jnthn | hoelzro: Are you thinking of adding a new file? | ||
For this particular test? | |||
hoelzro | jnthn: per KyleHa's suggestion | ||
I could put it somewhere else | |||
jnthn | No no, that file already exists, I think? | ||
KyleHa | If the file I specified doesn't exist, I typoed. | 22:45 | |
jnthn | KyleHa: It's something *like* that. :-) | ||
KyleHa | Pasted: t/spec/S12-construction/BUILD.t | ||
hoelzro | mkay | ||
jnthn | svn.pugscode.org/pugs/t/spec/S12-co...on/BUILD.t | ||
That one. | |||
Ah, KyleHa++ beat me to it. :-) | |||
22:46
bpetering joined
|
|||
masak | time to sleep. | 22:48 | |
bpetering | night masak :) | 22:49 | |
masak | good night, futuristic Perl people! see y'all tomorrow! | ||
22:49
masak left
|
|||
pugs_svn | r27733 | hoelzro++ | Added a test for RT #67888 (Perl6::Compiler subclassing and BUILD) | 22:49 | |
hoelzro | mkay, I remembered my password =)( | ||
bpetering quits to figgur out this yoonicode stuff in his term | |||
22:50
bpetering left
|
|||
hoelzro | please feel free to review my test | 22:50 | |
be back in a bit; grabbing dinner | |||
22:50
hoelzro left
|
|||
pugs_svn | r27734 | lwall++ | [p6-proj] tweak "bluespace" a bit | 22:55 | |
jnthn | www.perl6-projects.org/ on Firefox at 1024x768 has some layout issues. | 22:57 | |
pugs_svn | r27735 | kyle++ | [t/spec] label and adjust RT #67888 test | ||
jnthn | Going to sleep now, but mentioning it if anyone has time and html-fu to investigate... :-) | 22:58 | |
night all! | |||
23:02
arthur-_ joined
|
|||
pugs_svn | r27736 | lwall++ | [p6-proj] how 'bout I tweak the correct parameters this time... | 23:06 | |
23:10
justatheory joined
|
|||
pugs_svn | r27737 | lwall++ | [p6-proj] and move boxes down a bit | 23:12 | |
23:17
KyleHa left
|
|||
pmichaud | back home! | 23:19 | |
23:20
donaldh left,
donaldh joined
23:24
hoelzro joined
|
|||
pmichaud | (and now going out for dinner) | 23:25 | |
hoelzro | did anyone look over my test? | 23:26 | |
also, if I defined BUILD in PIR, would it be .sub 'BUILD' :submethod ... .end? | 23:27 | ||
pugs_svn | r27738 | lwall++ | [p6-proj] put Community *first*, not as part of miscellaneous | 23:29 | |
hoelzro does a grep | |||
TimToady | looks like KyleHa++ tweaked it some | 23:30 | |
hoelzro | TimToady: my test? | 23:32 | |
TimToady | do svn up and you'll find out :) | ||
hoelzro | ah ha =) | 23:33 | |
sjohnson | how's TimToady today | 23:41 | |
pugs_svn | r27739 | lwall++ | [p6-proj] delete 'and Interpreters' as meaningless precision | 23:44 | |
TimToady is recovering from OSCON and cooking dinner while tweaking perl6-projects to be Human-Compliant™ | 23:45 | ||
23:49
payload left
23:51
lumi__ joined,
lumi_ left
23:54
fridim_ left
|