-Ofun: xrl.us/hxhk | pugscode.org | pugs.kwiki.org | paste: paste.lisp.org/new/perl6 or sial.org/pbot/perl6 Set by apple-gunkies on 11 November 2005. |
|||
luqui | where'd svnbot6 go? | 00:03 | |
8023 happneed half an hour ago | |||
robkinyon | luqui: Apparently, svnbot6 has been somewhat tardy in its updates to the channel | 00:06 | |
buu | Heh | 00:21 | |
It's telling #buubot | |||
19:09 < svnbot6> r8024 | luqui++ | Added the introduction to theory.pod version 2, called the "type metatheory of | 00:22 | ||
Oh duh | |||
I have ops. | |||
It should work now. | 00:23 | ||
00:35
wolv is now known as wolverian
01:27
evalbot_8023 is now known as evalbot_8024
|
|||
stu7 is looking, but not finding anywhere to download a working perl6 ? | 01:33 | ||
wolverian | it has not been released yet. see pugscode.org | ||
stu7 | okey, thx wolverian | 01:34 | |
wolverian | if you're on windows, you can install www.pxperl.com/?pxperl | ||
(which includes pugs compiled ready for you :) | 01:35 | ||
dduncan | hey, CPAN's mirroring is working again ... we can now see the new stuff on the mirrors | 06:06 | |
meppl | guten morgen | 08:14 | |
dduncan | ?eval my $foo = [4,5]; $foo.perl; | 08:22 | |
evalbot_8024 | "[4, 5]" | ||
dduncan | ?eval my $foo = [4=>7,{5=>8}]; $foo.perl; | 08:23 | |
evalbot_8024 | "[(4 => 7), \{(\"5\" => 8),}]" | ||
dduncan | question: is a Pair key supposed to be stringified like a hash key? | ||
luqui | not in general | 08:24 | |
A Pair[a,b] is just a tuple of two things. The *standard* hash is constructed by Pair[Str,b]. | 08:25 | ||
(As are named arguments) | |||
dduncan | I see ... | ||
and I suppose that an array is constructed by Pair[Int,b] | |||
luqui | I suppose so | ||
In fact, noticing that symmetry, we might not want to call hashes that are keyed by non-strings hashes. | 08:26 | ||
Maybe: Array[b] : Pair[Int,b] :: Hash[b] : Pair[Str,b] :: Map[a,b] : Pair[a,b] | 08:27 | ||
(like an SAT analogy) | |||
dduncan | ?eval my $foo = ['4'=>7,{5=>8}]; $foo.perl; | ||
evalbot_8024 | "[(\"4\" => 7), \{(\"5\" => 8),}]" | ||
dduncan | well that works when I'm explicit, at least | ||
still, the main thing I was checking for tonight is that .perl works ... which is good, then I can use it soon | 08:29 | ||
nothingmuch | dduncan: someone was looking for you on #catalyst the other day | 08:44 | |
i think it was LTjake | |||
wrt Locale::Maketext | |||
dduncan | hello | ||
nothingmuch | hola =) | ||
dduncan | fyi, I've never been on #catalyst in my life | ||
will probably change over the next month, though | 08:45 | ||
do you know why? | |||
besides #perl6, I regularly hang out on just #tangram and #dbix-class, currently ... the latter one or two sometimes mention catalyst | 08:46 | ||
nothingmuch | hmm | 08:47 | |
i don't know why | |||
but i advised him to seek you out | |||
dduncan | also, Maketext isn't my module, but Keyedtext is | ||
nothingmuch | h | ||
oh | |||
oops =) | |||
in that case I caused much confusion over nothing at all | |||
dduncan | well, if someone contacts me, I'll set them straight ... as can you if you're back there | 08:48 | |
oh, if you're game, I welcome feedback on the revised Overview.pod and TODO.pod under the Rosetta-Incubator docs ... the former has already been edited by one person | 08:49 | ||
suffice it to say that if my time doesn't get used up by other things, we should have a working database under pugs in less than 2 weeks | 08:50 | ||
maybe in time for the 6.28.0 release | 08:51 | ||
nothingmuch | sorry, back | 08:52 | |
err, /me punts for now | |||
$work is drowning me | |||
dduncan | no problem, I'm about to go to bed anyway | ||
almost 1am here | |||
13:13
rafl_ is now known as rafl
|
|||
robkinyon | anyone here know anything about PDFlib or where I can find a channel on IRC where such people live? | 16:35 | |
r0nny | re | 17:22 | |
j0sephi | picasa.hu/1133365646-pic04031.jpg ;-))) :) | 17:25 | |
r0nny | darn | 17:26 | |
there is still a problem with method dispatching | |||
is there a way, to make each method to tell debug stuff ? | 17:29 | ||
rafl | r0nny: The current sixpan prototype will be in svn today, I guess. | 17:34 | |
r0nny | rafl: sweet :) | ||
stevan | luqui: pong | 17:36 | |
r0nny | darn | 17:39 | |
its in a loop somewhere, but there is no way, to have a loop | 17:40 | ||
gaal | will that j0 guy stop spamming us? | 17:53 | |
robkinyon | seen autrijus | 18:04 | |
of course - jabbot is here | |||
s/is/isn't/ | 18:05 | ||
19:00
PerlJam_ is now known as PerlJam
|
|||
Aankhen`` goes to sleep. | 19:14 | ||
G'night. | |||
gaal | Jesus fish! I quote: "if ($caller[1] =~ m/[.]pm \z/xms) {" <-scary to think of a module name with newlines in it, or that someone was paranoid enough to consider it | 19:30 | |
r0nny | re | 19:33 | |
gaal | why does ruleStandaloneBlock exist? | 20:12 | |
or rather, why must "the closing brace [...] be the last meaningful character on it line" ? | 20:14 | ||
and, on another topic, is there any insight about the name clash between the "fail" builtin and Test::fail? | 20:16 | ||
ingy_ | seen autrijus | 20:21 | |
robkinyon | ingy_: jabbot isn't here | 20:41 | |
ingy_ | robkinyon: ok | 20:47 | |
geoffb | gaal, re: "scary to think of a module name" ... that regex ugliness brought to you by PBP. | 21:16 | |
(In which it is suggested to use \z and /xms on every regex, regardless of actual need.) | 21:17 | ||
DesreveR | anyone ? | 22:00 | |
got a problem with a member var - for some reason it wants to call a method instead of getting the vaule | |||
rafl | Where shall I check in the sixpan tools prototype | 22:17 | |
s/$/?/ | |||
raptorXXX | why almost everything i try from here : pleac.sourceforge.net/pleac_haskell/index.html | 22:18 | |
does not work, any idea (i'm not talking about regex wich as stated need additional module , seems outdated) | 22:19 | ||
ghc 6.4 | |||
specificly "dot" notation.. | 22:21 | ||
DesreveR | rafl: maybe contrib ? | ||
raptorXXX | oops i see | ||
sorry | |||
there is Helpers and there is module | |||
rafl | DesreveR: I'd say misc. | 22:24 | |
geoffb | .oO( Debugging interpreters *bites* ) |
22:25 | |
rafl | s/interpreters// | 22:26 | |
svnbot6 | r8025 | rafl++ | r22538@ata: rafl | 2005-11-30 23:26:25 +0100 | 22:30 | |
r8025 | rafl++ | * Added the the current prototype for the sixpan tools. It's very proof of | |||
r8025 | rafl++ | concept but shows pretty well what it will be. | |||
geoffb | rafl, *chuckle* | 22:37 | |
rafl | geoffb: Err? | 22:38 | |
geoffb | rafl: s/interpreters// | ||
Juerd_ yawns as feather leeches from the debian mirror at "only" 50 Mbit/s | 22:39 | ||
geoffb | Still, nothing like having to write a decompiler just so you can figure out what's wrong with your compiler . . . . | ||
Juerd_, yow. Very nice | |||
Juerd_ | . . . ! :) | ||
geoffb | Same data center? | ||
Juerd_ | nafaik | ||
Nope | 22:40 | ||
geoffb | I knew .nl had decent connectivity, but that's damned impressive. | ||
rafl | Juerd_: Do you (or a script) do a killall apache from time to time on feather? | ||
Juerd_: I actually don't like sixpan.perl6.nl being down every week or so. | 22:41 | ||
Juerd_ | geoffb: Within the same datacentre, I'd expect to get the full 100 Mbit/s | ||
geoffb: Or damn close to it :) | |||
rafl: No | |||
rafl: Not that I know of, at least | |||
geoffb | Assuming the NIC and switch aren't in disagreement about duplex | 22:42 | |
Juerd_ | rafl: What does your apache log as the shutdown reason? | ||
geoffb: Sure, assuming all kinds of good settings :) | |||
geoffb: If someone screws their settings, of course you won't reach optimal speeds | |||
geoffb: Actually, in an environment like this, there is no question about duplex. It's either full duplex, or not at all :) | 22:43 | ||
geoffb: And in this kind of setup, one is usually very careful with autoneg enabled versus disabled. | |||
geoffb | nodnod | ||
Juerd_ | We have it disabled where possible, as that helps an extra few percent in performance. | ||
Most of this is fixed at 100basetx-fd :) | 22:44 | ||
geoffb | Turning off negotiation gives better performance? That doesn't say much about the negotiation. | ||
Juerd_ | Indeed. | ||
rafl | Juerd_: caught SIGTERM, shutting down | ||
Juerd_ | rafl: Hmmm | ||
rafl: At what time? | |||
rafl | geoffb: Well, Am I wrong about that? | 22:45 | |
Juerd_: unregulary | |||
Juerd_ | rafl: Weird, then | ||
geoffb | rafl, well, no . . . . | ||
Juerd_ | rafl: Can you name me the most recent? | ||
rafl: It'll have to be done through sudo or cron, both of which are logged. | |||
Also, I'm going home in 2 minutes :) | 22:46 | ||
rafl | Juerd_: Nov 4 23:56:00 2005 for example | 22:47 | |
Juerd_: Any news about 22c3, btw? | 22:48 | ||
Juerd_ | rafl: Logs don't go back that much | ||
rafl: Well, as it is right now, I'm more than out of cash | 22:49 | ||
rafl: BUT - one client owes me 8000, and should have paid it by yesterday. | |||
So I'm in a weird and uncertain situation right now. | |||
PerlJam | In america your path would be clear: sue for payment! ;) | 22:50 | |
rafl | Juerd_: Well.. shall I organize something to sleep for you in Berlin or not? | ||
Juerd_ | Theoretically, I have enough to pay bills and food for a few months, but practically, I can't travel much more than 500km because I'm out of gas and already using petrol... | 22:51 | |
rafl: If it's no big problem if I cancel last-minute, yes, please do arrange something. | |||
I do *plan* on coming, but I'm not entirely sure I'll be able to | |||
obra | Juerd_: has the client given an excuse? | ||
rafl | Juerd_: It would only be unkind, I guess. | ||
Juerd_ | obra: No - but the invoice was due yesterday, so I haven't sent reminders yet. | 22:52 | |
rafl | Juerd_: Well, so maybe you can send a mail to [email@hidden.address] and explain your situation? (and mention you know me) | ||
Juerd_ | obra: It's considered highly inpolite here, to send reminders before an invoice is due :( | ||
rafl: Will do | |||
rafl | Juerd_: Thank you. Nice regards from me! :-) | 22:53 | |
obra | Juerd_: but now that it's overdue, is it implite to call? | ||
Juerd_ | obra: Sort of. The expectation pattern is two paper reminders, then a call | ||
obra | two paper reminders after it's overdue? | 22:54 | |
wow. | |||
That's...special. | |||
And unthinkably tolerant here. Especially with a small vendor | |||
Juerd_ | obra: It's no exception to have to wait over 60 days to get your money. | ||
pdcawley | Um... I know perl 6 has 'gather', does it have an attendant 'scatter' or am I just confused? | ||
obra | Juerd_: right. but that's what PO terms are for. | ||
If they negotiate net 60, they get net 60. | |||
If they just fail to pay you, that's not ok. | 22:55 | ||
Juerd_ | obra: It's what they're for, but the economic climate doesn't allow strict enforcement. | ||
obra: This is the biggest problem in the micro-economic Netherlands... | |||
obra | Do you do contracts as some percentage up front? | ||
Juerd_ | Yes, but this wasn't work. | 22:56 | |
These are goods. Well, sort of. | |||
obra | heh | ||
Juerd_ | Domain names... | ||
And because this is a very good customer, I have been less strict than usual with prepayment. | |||
obra | *nod* | ||
Juerd_ | And then shit happened in several areas simultaneously. | 22:57 | |
obra | "Was a very good customer" | ||
Juerd_ | It's nice to sell a big bunch of domain names and make good profit | ||
And they wanted this within a day, because they were planning on releasing their new commercial name to the public. | |||
Now, I do expect to get paid soon | 22:58 | ||
But I'd be lying if I said I was certain. | |||
obra | Best luck :) | 23:01 | |
Juerd_ | rafl: Sent | 23:05 | |
rafl: And I can't find any killall calls through sudo | |||
I'm going home now | 23:07 | ||
afk | |||
rafl | Juerd_: OK. Doesn't matter. | ||
j0sephi | picasa.hu/1133393718-1011_de4.jpg ;-) :) | 23:36 | |
geoffb | Someone who can op themselves in this channel, please kickban j0* | 23:50 |