pugscode.org | temporary feather address: perl6.wall.org | sial.org/pbot/perl6 | ?eval [~] <m oo se> | We do Haskell, too | > reverse (show (scanl (*) 1 [1..] !! 4)) Set by allbery_b on 24 March 2007. |
|||
moritz | polettix: should I add a failing test case, or do you want to do that? | 00:00 | |
moritz is studying physics and is fairly confident that this _is_ wrong ;) | |||
polettix | moritz: I know I should, but I don't have enough will/time/power to upgrade ghc :/ | 00:01 | |
moritz | polettix: to what? | ||
dduncan | which is abbreviated to "tuits" | ||
polettix | probably it's time that I upgrade, at last... | ||
moritz: there has been a mandatory upgrade in ghc used for pugs a few months ago | 00:02 | ||
moritz | polettix: ok, so you're talking about ghc 6.6 | 00:03 | |
polettix: because now 6.7 is out... | |||
polettix: and I haven't upgraded, because Debian "to-be-stable" etch doesn't have it | |||
00:03
overkordbaever left
|
|||
polettix | yes, I stopped at 6.4.2 | 00:04 | |
geoffb | And in any case, ghc 6.6 under etch works fine (that's the one I use) | ||
.oO( Dangit, Debian, get Etch out the door. I want testing to start getting real updates, and not just week after week of translation fixes! ) |
00:05 | ||
moritz | geoffb: won't be long... a week or so | 00:06 | |
00:06
avarab joined
|
|||
geoffb | moritz: oh thank $deity | 00:06 | |
geoffb wonders whether Debian Etch or CentOS 5 will release first .... | 00:08 | ||
moritz | geoffb: at least that's what Andreas Barth wrote a few days ago on d-devel-announce | ||
moritz wonders if perl6 or duke nukem forever will release first ;-) | |||
00:08
mr_ank joined
|
|||
geoffb | Perl 6, clearly. DNF is a self-fulfilling prophecy | 00:09 | |
00:09
avarab is now known as avar
|
|||
moritz | geoffb: a month ago I saw on amazon.com that you could preorder DNF - with a release date somwhere in autumn 2007 ;-) | 00:09 | |
geoffb: ok, what about The Hurd? | 00:10 | ||
geoffb | moritz: wow. Very ... optimistic. | ||
You know, I sincerely wonder how anyone manages to continue pitching DNF for continued funding. | |||
Well, heck, at least you can sortof run Debian on that ... prolly about as well as say Debian/NetBSD, but then I've never used either one .... | 00:11 | ||
moritz | geoffb: same for me... but when did they start? somwhere end 80's? 90's? | 00:12 | |
ok, there aren't really many hurd developers left | 00:13 | ||
some 4 making regular contributions I heard lately | |||
polettix | moritz: I don't find Haskell 6.7 (haskell.org/ghc/download.html) | ||
lambdabot | Title: The Glasgow Haskell Compiler | ||
geoffb | Well, hmmm. Doom came out in what, '93 or so? So DN must have been around the same time, and DNF probably started mid-90's then. We must have already crossed the decade point. | ||
moritz | polettix: maybe it's not yet final | 00:14 | |
00:14
lumi_ joined
|
|||
geoffb | OK, must revert to pumpkin form now. | 00:15 | |
commute & | |||
svnbot6 | r15825 | moritz++ | added test for exponentation op in complex context, polettix++ | 00:20 | |
dduncan | question: are any of you aware of either programming languages that allow symbols or identifiers to be the empty string (only possible with delimited symbols/identifiers), or file systems that allow file names to be the empty string? | ||
I know that a hash key can be the empty string, so theoretically, allowing an empty for either of the above seems reasonable | 00:21 | ||
moritz | dduncan: I know of none | ||
dduncan: and I think that it might be reasonable, but it is counter-intuitive | |||
dduncan: why would you store something in nothing? | 00:22 | ||
dduncan | if you conceptualize that an entity name is a string, and a name can include any characters, and a string can be empty, it wouldn't seem unreasonable for an entity whose name is the empty string | 00:23 | |
if the language already supports delimited identifiers, or $($foo), then $foo could be the empty string and it technically should work | |||
moritz | dduncan: but if you are programming, what kind of data would you store in a variable with an empty name? | ||
you could use $, @ and % in perl ;-) | 00:24 | ||
dduncan | it could be used either for a default value or for a root namespace | ||
polettix compiles ghc... | |||
dduncan | eg, a path in unix has parts delimited by /, and the root doesn't have anything except the / | ||
moritz | dduncan: yes, but it has the "/", and if you remove that, you still have "." | 00:25 | |
dduncan: you for UNIX paths you always have a non-empty alias | |||
dduncan | well anyway, I'm going to experiment with supporting empty-string identifiers, and see what comes out of it in practice | ||
moritz | but defaults are an interesting idea | ||
dduncan: what kind of language are you designing? | 00:26 | ||
dduncan | a similar argument could be made for, a hash allows an empty-string key, so what value would you associate with it? | ||
Juerd | It'd make some sense if $_ were called just $ :) | ||
Although that'd pose a huge problem with $.foo :) | |||
polettix | dduncan: while I can understand a rationale for an empty hash key, I don't fully get the benefits of an empty variable identifier | ||
dduncan | if you use a hash as a name-space | ||
in many ways, a hash and a namespace are very similar conceptually, or some would say identical | 00:27 | ||
Juerd | polettix: In Perl 6, the empty-named variables $, @, and %, represent the current invocant ("self object") | ||
moritz | dduncan: so would you allow variable names with whitespaces? | ||
polettix | Juerd: you see? now I can get the benefits! | ||
dduncan | yes | ||
but I will point out that in my language, all identifiers are delimited normally | 00:28 | ||
Juerd | polettix: Consider the amount of typing you'll save in an average well-factored class :) | ||
dduncan | with non-delimited versions allowed for brevity in some cases | ||
note that in any file system, a file name can have spaces in it | |||
it is just as reasonable for identifiers to, if they are delimited | |||
Juerd | Not in a 8.3 fat system :) | ||
moritz | dduncan: not in FAT16 | ||
dduncan | okay | 00:29 | |
moritz | Juerd: damned, you're faster ;) | ||
Juerd | moritz: It's not about 16 versus 32. | ||
fat16 supports long file names. | |||
Just not big disks | |||
dduncan | but it is common in modern systems to support any (more or less) characters in file names | ||
also, lots of database engines let you name entities with spaces or any characters in the names ... SQL calls them delimited identifiers or something | |||
Juerd | dduncan: No, Windows doesn't let you use a colon (":") in a filename | ||
dduncan | in any event, what I am writing is a database language | ||
Juerd | dduncan: And that's incredibly annoying because colons are used in timestamps a lot. | 00:30 | |
dduncan | are you sure Windows prevents the : at the filesystem level, or just in the UI? | ||
moritz | what does linux has as restrictions one file name? anything execpt '\0' and '/'? | ||
Juerd | Filesystem level. | ||
dduncan | okay | ||
Juerd | FAT could handle it, but the API refuses, as does the spec. | ||
Same for NTFS | 00:31 | ||
dduncan | okay, in any event, I was just citing file systems for cases for reasonableness | ||
wolverian | so who likes newlines in filenames? :) | ||
Juerd | "If we started supporting it now, that would be incompatible with older versions" is the argument for not enabling the feature. It's not a technical issue. | ||
wolverian: I'd use them if they could trick users using ls(1) | |||
dduncan | that's what emulation layers are for | ||
wolverian | Juerd, aw, ls doesn't print them? | 00:32 | |
Juerd | wolverian: No, it substitutes them with question marks :( | ||
wolverian | how annoying | ||
dduncan | eg, on Mac OS X, file system delimiters are typically either / or : depending on which toolbox an application was written to, and it all just works thanks to emulation layers | ||
Juerd | wolverian: But surprisingly useful :) | ||
dduncan | and in any event, file names can contain either character, afaik | 00:33 | |
Juerd | Unix filenames cannot contain /. | ||
Slash and nullbyte are not usable. All other byte values are. | |||
wolverian | hm, I thought : was not allowed either, but I guess that's wrong. | ||
Juerd | I'm not sure, at all, how unixish systems handle unicode for filenames. | ||
wolverian: : is allowed just fine | 00:34 | ||
moritz | touch : works ;) | ||
wolverian | (some compilers seem to use it as a filename:linenumber separator, though.. that's weird and breaks.) | ||
moritz | put all your binaries into b:in, push b:in onto $PATH and write a bug report that your binaries are not found ;-) | 00:35 | |
wolverian: no, you have to parse it from the back | |||
<name>:<digit>+ | |||
no breaks | |||
dduncan | interesting ... I just used the Mac OS X 10.4.8 Finder to make a file named "foo/bar", and the Terminal shows it as "foo:bar", moreover, I made a file in the terminal using a :, and the Finder shows it as a slash ... the terminal won't let me use a / | 00:36 | |
wolverian | moritz, yeah. | ||
moritz | <name>:<digit>+$ that is | ||
Juerd | juerd@lanova:~/tmp/foo$ perl -le'my $fn = join "", map { chr($_) eq "/" ? () : chr($_) } 1..255; open my $fh, ">", $fn or die $!' | ||
dduncan | that's probably the emulation layer | ||
Juerd | juerd@lanova:~/tmp/foo$ ls | ||
??????????????????????????????? !"#$%&'()*+,-.0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? | |||
See? All 253 byte values. | |||
Eh, 254 | |||
offby1 | quit swearing! This is a family channel. | ||
dduncan | afaik, the Finder is a Carbon program, meaning it thinks delimiters are : | ||
offby1 plugs his ears | |||
Juerd | offby1: This is not a family channel. | 00:37 | |
dduncan | I mean, path separators | ||
Patterner | I think I used the Finder on the Apple ][ | ||
00:37
geoffb joined
|
|||
Juerd | Patterner: I think you shouldn't use drugs | 00:37 | |
dduncan | I've used an Apple 2, but I don't recall what the name of its file manager was | ||
Patterner | Filer :) | ||
Q)uit U)pdate R)un | 00:38 | ||
moritz | anyway, bed++ | ||
Juerd | Yea, bed++ | ||
Good idea | |||
z | |||
moritz | perlbot: karma bed | 00:40 | |
perlbot | Karma for bed: 6 | ||
Patterner | perlbot: karma coffee | 00:41 | |
perlbot | Karma for coffee: -2 | ||
Patterner | this is *not* right | ||
polettix | bed++ & | ||
moritz | perlbot: karma svnbot6 | ||
perlbot | Karma for svnbot6: 1 | ||
moritz | ;-) | ||
'night | 00:42 | ||
Patterner | tea++ | ||
00:58
deq` joined
01:14
nelhage joined
01:18
dolmans joined
|
|||
Aankhen`` | Did "coerce:<as>" fall into oblivion? | 01:18 | |
01:55
kanru joined
02:00
Alias_ joined
02:03
ajs_home joined
02:12
kanru joined
02:23
kt joined,
offby1` joined
02:37
SubStack joined
03:03
offby1 joined
03:22
justatheory joined
03:52
perlmonkey2 joined
04:05
avarab joined
04:08
[particle] joined
04:09
amnesiac joined
04:10
RHainsworth joined
04:11
RHainsworth left
04:13
prly_ joined
04:16
offby1 joined
04:34
MikeJS joined,
Alias__ joined
04:46
justatheory joined,
prly joined
04:51
prly__ joined
05:15
prly joined
05:26
the_dormant joined
05:30
prly_ joined
05:32
perlmonkey2 left
05:51
the_dormant joined
05:52
the_dormant left,
the_dormant joined
06:00
devogon joined
06:01
tuna joined
06:09
offby1 joined
06:12
forsaken joined
06:14
BooK_ joined
06:26
esstone joined,
eric__ joined
|
|||
Aankhen`` | ?eval 10 xx 5 | 06:28 | |
06:28
evalbot_r15824 is now known as evalbot_r15825
|
|||
evalbot_r15825 | (10, 10, 10, 10, 10) | 06:28 | |
Aankhen`` | ?eval my @foo = (1, <2 3 4 5>); @foo.perl.say | 06:32 | |
evalbot_r15825 | OUTPUT[[1, "2", "3", "4", "5"]ā¤] Bool::True | ||
Aankhen`` | ?eval my constant @foo = (1, <2 3 4 5>); @foo.perl.say | ||
evalbot_r15825 | OUTPUT[[1, "2", "3", "4", "5"]ā¤] Bool::True | ||
Aankhen`` | ?eval my constant @foo = (1, <2 3 4 5>); @foo[5] = 6; | ||
evalbot_r15825 | \6 | ||
06:42
forsaken joined
06:49
eric__ joined
|
|||
Aankhen`` | Tene: Ping. | 06:56 | |
07:02
RHainsworth joined
07:12
buetow joined
07:20
kanru joined
07:25
ozo_ joined
07:27
marmic joined
07:51
polettix joined,
jisom joined,
dduncan left
08:05
the_dormant joined
08:06
the_dormant joined
08:10
luqui joined,
buetow joined
08:11
kaoru joined
08:19
rfordinal joined
|
|||
polettix | my local mirror is stuck to 15820, does any other have the same problem? | 08:21 | |
polettix at last realises that svn.openfoundry.org/pugs might be a bit outdated | 08:24 | ||
lambdabot | Title: Revision 15820: / | ||
Juerd | polettix: It moved to svn.pugscode.org | 08:25 | |
Aankhen`` | Aye. | ||
polettix | is there a page/hint for switching to the new repository? | ||
polettix would like to RTFM | 08:26 | ||
Juerd | There is, but I don't know | 08:27 | |
You could of course just check out new. | |||
polettix | this would mean re-mirroring... I hope this is not really necessary | ||
Juerd | It probably isn't | 08:28 | |
integral | svk mirror --relocate surely | ||
Juerd | I'm surprised that svn.openfoundry.org was kept up t odate all the time | ||
polettix | I'll ask in the svk channel, thanks :) | ||
oh, I'll see it as well, integral | |||
\o/ relocation successful, thanks :) | 08:30 | ||
08:33
kaoru is now known as kaoru6
08:34
SubStack joined
08:39
andara joined
08:42
drbean joined
08:51
elmex joined
09:01
ayrnieu joined
09:03
forsaken joined
09:04
MikeJS joined
09:12
xinming joined
09:13
ruoso joined
09:26
MikeJS joined
09:32
MikeJS joined
09:46
buetow joined
09:50
do joined
09:52
do left
09:53
do joined
09:56
RHainsworth joined
10:19
chris2 joined
10:27
DarkWolf84 joined
10:29
lichtkind joined
|
|||
lichtkind | audreyt: i need a nice and free(GFDL) pisture of you for wikipedia pugs article , have you one? | 10:32 | |
moritz | lichtkind: do you notice that the english Audrey_Tang article has one? | 10:33 | |
lichtkind | moritz: thats the one we actuelly use and its not everybodys favor | 10:34 | |
i like it but for many its pain in the eyes | |||
but hej i foun another in wiki commons commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Au...Tang_2.jpg | 10:36 | ||
Leibsle: moin :) | 10:37 | ||
10:41
avarab is now known as avar
|
|||
moritz | lichtkind: perl-6.de/ my new German project, feedback is welcome | 10:54 | |
lambdabot | Title: Perl 6 - Programmieren fĆ¼r Faule | ||
lichtkind | ok i link it om rurrentyl busy :) | 10:55 | |
moritz | lichtkind: no problem, thx | ||
lichtkind | moritz: inserted : * [[perl-6.de][perl-6.de]] deutsche Wiki zu Perl6 von Moritz Lenz | 10:58 | |
moritz | lichtkind: das ist kein Wiki ;-) | 11:01 | |
lichtkind: vielleicht bekommt es noch eins, aber bisher nicht | |||
lichtkind | achso die buttons sahen so aus | ||
ok | |||
ich Ƥnder das | 11:02 | ||
11:04
buetow joined
11:07
forsaken joined
|
|||
lichtkind | moritz: ---++ weitere Informationen: | 11:13 | |
* [[perl-6.de][perl-6.de]] deutsche Perl6-Seite von Moritz Lenz | |||
moritz | lichtkind: danke | ||
11:15
iblechbot joined
|
|||
lichtkind | gerne | 11:15 | |
11:25
buetow joined
11:28
tuna joined
11:35
rfordinal joined
11:36
the_dormant joined
11:44
rfordinal_ joined
12:03
buetow joined
12:05
eumenides joined
12:11
charsba__ joined
12:14
Limbic_Region joined
12:20
buetow joined
12:31
fglock joined,
idiotmax joined
13:06
manjuj joined
|
|||
manjuj | Hi. I am trying to install pugs on a machine where I am not the root. At the last step, when I do "make install", it tries to mkdir /usr/local/lib/perl6, and so fails. I did export PUGS_BUILD_OPTS=install_dir=/home/gphilip/local/ as mentioned in the INSTALL file, but that didn't help. What is a workaround? | 13:13 | |
kolibrie | most of us do not install, but run from the build | 13:14 | |
lumi_ | Maybe you can use chroot or fakeroot? | 13:15 | |
moritz | manjuj: iirc the INSTALL file mentions as well thet PREFIX is broken :( | ||
manjuj | kolibrie: that means you use the ./pugs executable in the build directory, right? | 13:16 | |
kolibrie | yep | ||
I have a symlink from my pugs executable to ~/bin/pugs | 13:17 | ||
manjuj | lumi_: those are not an option for me | ||
everybody: thanks | |||
kolibrie | manjuj: you're welcome | ||
manjuj | Another question: I would like to start contributing, but don't know where to start. | 13:18 | |
kolibrie | do you have a commit bit? | ||
manjuj | Is there some specific task that I can start on? | 13:19 | |
kolibrie: yes | |||
kolibrie | manjuj: good, that's the first step | ||
manjuj | I have started on the Apocrypha | ||
kolibrie | mostly, we just contribute where we have interest and when we have time | ||
manjuj | kolibrie: I have interest and time, but don't know a specific task to start with. I know C, and am learning Haskell. | 13:20 | |
kolibrie | I've written tests, and I play a lot with fglock's Pugs::Compiler::Rule, and give suggestions | ||
manjuj | Is there a todo list somewhere, so that I can look over the list and start tinkering with something? | 13:21 | |
gaal | manjuj: dev.pugscode.org/ and follow "all open tickets" | ||
lambdabot | Title: Pugs - Trac | ||
manjuj | gaal: thanks | ||
moritz | manjuj: our _big_ todo list are the failing test cases ;-) | 13:22 | |
gaal | np | ||
13:24
Loro_ joined
|
|||
manjuj | is it ok to use darcs with the pugs source, or should i use svn only? | 13:26 | |
gaal | the dacrs mirror is read-only | ||
manjuj | gaal:ok | ||
so i have to use svn if i have to do commits | |||
gaal | or svk. :-) | ||
moritz | manjuj: do you have a commit bit? | 13:27 | |
manjuj | moritz: yes | ||
moritz | very well ;-) | ||
TimToady | another way to get at the tasks is via putter's picture of the project. | ||
see dev.pugscode.org/browser/project_pl..._graph.png | |||
lambdabot | Title: /project_planning/a_dependency_graph.png - Pugs - Trac, tinyurl.com/yu9fvz | ||
moritz | TimToady: I'm a bit fixed on design by contract... in Eiffel you can label pre- and postconditions... | 13:28 | |
13:28
dmq joined
|
|||
moritz | TimToady: so that when one fails, it's easier to locate... | 13:28 | |
TimToady: or even to see what the problem might be without looking at the source code | 13:29 | ||
TimToady: do you think that might be a good idea for p6 as well? | |||
TimToady | see S04:918 | 13:30 | |
moritz | ok | ||
TimToady | and S06:1562 | 13:31 | |
biab & | 13:32 | ||
moritz | I meant something like PRE { not_zero: $x < 0; is_valid_foo: foo($x) > 0; } | 13:33 | |
with explicit names for single PREs and POSTs | 13:34 | ||
so maybe not_zero: PRE { $x != 0 }; is_valid_foo: PRE { foo($x)> 0} | |||
TimToady | maybe not_zero: PRE { $x < 0 }; is_valid_foo: PRE { foo($x) > 0 } | 13:35 | |
he | |||
heh | |||
moritz | is that already in the spec? | ||
moritz is overwhelmed by the shear mass of text in the specs ;-) | 13:36 | ||
PerlJam is sitting here wondering what "maybe" means in perl6 ;-) | |||
TimToady | no, but valid syntax, and presumably whatever processes the PRE could look up the label | ||
moritz | ok, so it would be just a small step | 13:37 | |
TimToady | actually, "maybe" is used in contend blocks. | ||
gaal | maybe every default exception handler could print "near label FOO:" if there's a FOO nearby | ||
(regardles of DBC) | |||
s/s/ss/ | |||
moritz | nice idea | 13:38 | |
TimToady | I don't know what dbc does with the labels; is it more than reporting? | ||
gaal | though perhaps for autodocumentation value, DBC wants more textual names | ||
moritz | TimToady: in Eiffel not | ||
PerlJam | seems like it would be better to have some syntax like this then: PRE :labeld("foo") { ... } | 13:39 | |
er, labeled | |||
(if it's just for reporting) | |||
TimToady | or perhaps there's something that can be done with label => ($x < 1) | 13:40 | |
manjuj | what is "smoke testing" ? where can i read up on that? I tried "make test", and it fails with "runcompiler...openFile does not exist...". I remember seeing sometime during the compilation that some package required for smoke testing is missing, though i don't remember what. | ||
TimToady | back briefly in 20 minutes & | ||
manjuj | i meant "make smoke" | 13:41 | |
avar | smoke testing is just when you submit `make test' results to a central server, usually automatically | ||
gaal | manjuj: openFile does not exist probably means someone forgot "-e" somewhere, tracking that down would be great | ||
moritz | and producing a nice HTML output | ||
gaal | manjuj: see smoke.pugscode.org/ | ||
lambdabot | Title: Pugs Smoke Reports | ||
manjuj | gaal: thanks | ||
gaal | click on one of the rightmost >>s | 13:42 | |
manjuj | all: thanks | ||
gaal | if you want to perform a smoke yourself, "cpan Task::Smoke" | ||
Can take about 45min, give or take three hours | |||
manjuj | so am i not supposed to do "make smoke", just "cpan Task::Smoke" ? | 13:43 | |
gaal | oh no, make smoke; but you need some Perl 5 modules for that | ||
so unless you happen to have them installed on your system already, run the cpan command above to get them. | |||
(once per machine). | |||
manjuj | got it | ||
but that too would require root permissions, wouldn't it? | 13:44 | ||
gaal | not necessarily | ||
manjuj | ok | ||
i'll try | |||
gaal | if you habitually install stuff from cpan to your ~/perl or something, it's no different | ||
manjuj | ok | 13:45 | |
gaal | I can't look into that error that you saw, so just for the sake of whoever wants/can debug it: runcompiler is a small wrapper that we generate that just calls the haskell compiler with the correct local package paths and stuff | 13:46 | |
apparently one call to it somewhere breaks -- manjuj if you still have the output from 'make' that shows it please paste it here: sial.org/pbot/perl6 | 13:47 | ||
manjuj | in a minute | ||
gaal | ..with sufficient context to see where it occurs | ||
great, manjuj++ | |||
bbiab & | |||
manjuj | The first error I get is "ghc-pkg-wrapper: ~/download/pugs/third-party/installed/packages.conf: openFile: does not exist (No such file or directory)", and it looks like something is missing in my local installation, rather than something to do with the source. | 13:53 | |
gaal: would it be still useful if i paste the output from 'make' ? | 13:56 | ||
TimToady | back (briefly) | ||
moritz | manjuj: if you can resolve this issue by installing prerequiries it's not usefull | 13:57 | |
gaal | manjuj: did you complete one 'make'? | 13:59 | |
manjuj | gaal: no, i am doing that cpan install now | 14:00 | |
gaal | manjuj: I meant, of pugs itself. That file, packages.conf, is only created when you build pugs | 14:01 | |
DarkWolf84 | how I can make labels for last in perl6 | 14:02 | |
manjuj | gaal: yes, i did one make (actually several), the error comes when i do 'make install' after that | ||
sorry, the error comes when i do 'make smoke' | 14:03 | ||
gaal | oh, I thought it was in make smoke... so okay, it's probably related to your more general install | ||
er, ESCdd, okay. :-) | |||
manjuj | 'make install' has some other error -- no root permission etc | ||
gaal | nodnod | ||
DarkWolf84 | make test fails too for me | 14:04 | |
TimToady | DarkWolf84: loop labels work the same as in Perl 5. | 14:07 | |
14:07
eden_c joined
|
|||
PerlJam | TimToady: btw, what precipitated the recent S05 changes? Did you have an aha! moment or something? | 14:08 | |
gaal | no, it was April Fool's day, and he had a ha-ha! moment. | 14:09 | |
TimToady | I made a list of metachars and non-metachars and realized that 2/3 were already meta | ||
PerlJam | gaal: heh | ||
TimToady | and I'd just got done bragging on PerlMonks that P6 kept you from memorizing arbitrary lists of exceptions | ||
gaal | (brad driven development)++ | ||
brag, too | |||
Limbic_Region | someone hit me with the clue stick. What is the syntax for initializing multiple variables in a C for loop? | 14:10 | |
PerlJam | TimToady: Well, I have to tell you that when I read your modifications I thought "why wasn't it this way to begin with?" | ||
gaal | Limbic_Region: commas | ||
PerlJam | Limbic_Region: for (i =0, j =1, k = 5; ... ) | ||
gaal | Limbic_Region: for (x = 0, y = 0; x > y ; x++, y--) {...} | 14:11 | |
Limbic_Region | thanks | ||
TimToady | PerlJam: It was one of those things that is only obvious in retrospect, like the patch program. | 14:13 | |
well, I've gotta commute from Williamsburg to Baltimore, so I'll be offline for a bit. | |||
PerlJam | TimToady++ have some karma for your trip :-) | ||
14:14
forsaken joined
|
|||
TimToady | thanks | 14:14 | |
bbl & | |||
gaal | I liked the pictures | ||
(the examples) | |||
14:14
forsaken joined
14:16
forsaken joined,
fglock joined
14:18
forsaken joined,
ayrnieu joined,
rfordinal_ is now known as rfordinal
14:19
forsaken joined
14:20
amnesiac joined
14:36
perlmonkey2 joined
|
|||
kolibrie | TimToady: hey, you'll drive right past me (Fairfax) | 14:38 | |
and Limbic_Region, too, I believe | 14:39 | ||
14:42
deq` joined
14:46
kanru joined
14:48
ashleyb joined,
ProperNoun joined
15:01
bonesss joined
15:11
lambdabot joined
15:15
vel joined
15:19
vel6608 joined
15:45
BooK joined
15:49
fglock joined
15:54
Casan_ joined
15:55
Casan__ joined
16:09
Jedai joined
|
|||
moritz | should [+] @f be the same as reduce &infix<+>, @f? | 16:16 | |
16:23
cmarcelo joined,
fglock joined
|
|||
cmarcelo | fglock: ping | 16:23 | |
moose | |||
fglock | cmarcelo: ola | 16:24 | |
cmarcelo: you asked about mp6-in-pugs, | 16:25 | ||
the idea is to generate code that pugs can run, | |||
but the regex engine compiles to perl6 code | |||
so mp6-in-pugs doesn't depend on PCR or PGE | 16:26 | ||
16:26
Lorn joined
|
|||
moritz | ?eval 4i ~~ Num | 16:26 | |
evalbot_r15825 | Bool::False | 16:27 | |
cmarcelo | Lorn: hey.. we are discussing the possible tasks for YAPC::SA. | ||
fglock | cmarcelo: so you have the whole compiler tools in plain perl6 | ||
moritz | ?eval 4i ~~ Complex | ||
evalbot_r15825 | Bool::True | ||
polettix | moritz: is this what you expect? | ||
moritz | polettix: no, Complex should be a subtype of Num | ||
polettix | phew! :) | ||
Lorn | cmarcelo: cool, we need this :) | ||
moritz | polettix: at least if I'm not completely wrong | ||
cmarcelo | so, we have mp6-in-pugs, which get mp6 code and turns into the subset of perl that pugs runs? | 16:28 | |
Lorn | i searching a specification of STD... | ||
16:28
fglock joined
|
|||
cmarcelo | fglock: so, we have mp6-in-pugs, which get mp6 code and turns into the subset of perl that pugs runs? | 16:28 | |
16:29
eden_c joined
|
|||
fglock | cmarcelo: yes | 16:29 | |
Lorn | cmarcelo: wow, you will think to do this? mp6 in haskell ? | ||
eden_c | hi | ||
cmarcelo | eden_c: moose! | ||
(festa de brasileiros hoje no canal?) | |||
fglock | but "mp6" can actually turn out to be a superset of pugs :) | ||
eden_c | cmarcelo, moose rules | 16:30 | |
cmarcelo | Lorn: actually, make mp6-in-pugs generate code for pugs run... (as I understood) | ||
eden_c | cmarcelo, is that what we're doing at the hackathon? | 16:31 | |
avar | how about generating pasm?:) | ||
cmarcelo | fglock: also, there's the regex engine in p6. is this "task" independent? or mp6-in-pugs depend on this? | ||
eden_c: we are throwing ideas in the air :) | 16:32 | ||
avar: pasm = parrot asm? (I'm not familiar w/ parrot project) | |||
avar | yep | ||
eden_c | cmarcelo, I still need to get the hang of the perl6 project lingo | ||
16:32
fglock joined
|
|||
avar | anyway, having it generate a subset of p6 is cool for running it on $other_stuff | 16:32 | |
like perl6.pir or pugs | 16:33 | ||
cmarcelo | avar: fglock suggested mp6-in-pugs and mp6-in-parrot, the later would be generate pasm I think.. | ||
fglock: read irc logs | |||
spinclad | mp6-to-PAST would be useful | ||
fglock | avar: the idea is to use mp6 (or kp6) as a desugaring layer | 16:34 | |
cmarcelo | eden_c: did you read flavio's email about hackaton in cascavel-pm? | ||
fglock | in order to support the several backends | ||
eden_c | cmarcelo, yep | ||
cmarcelo | spinclad: hi :) | ||
spinclad | hi all | ||
ashleyb | cool ---> perl6.cz/wiki/Synopses looks like the history of these synopses wiki pages are kept in real time with the changes that are checked in, So this looks like the best place on the web to view changes to the Synopses in context (unless someone knows of a better way on the web ??). Who's responsible for this page (I don't speak czech)? anyone know? (for example, see diff: perl6.cz/w/index.php?title=Synopses%2 | ||
lambdabot | Title: Synopses - perl6.cz | 16:35 | |
fglock | if we get perl6-to-p6parrot running, it can then generate pir (for example) | ||
so the next generation of 6-on-6 would run on haskell, perl5, and parrot | |||
by piggybacking on existing implementations | 16:36 | ||
cmarcelo | pasm = parrot asm code, PAST = ______, PIR = pugs intermediate representation? | ||
spinclad | PAST: parrot Asomething syntax tree | 16:37 | |
fglock | (I've got a really lousy connection today) | ||
eden_c | me too, I'm still waiting for my account on feather | ||
16:38
fglock joined
|
|||
spinclad | parrot has tools for PAST -> POST (parrot operator syntax tree, equiv of PIR or pasm) -> PIR, pasm, or pbc (parrot byte code) | 16:38 | |
more or less | |||
cmarcelo | spinclad: these tools are working 'today'? | ||
fglock | cmarcelo: the regex engine is a compiler that is written in mp6 | ||
cmarcelo | if so, PAST looks like is a better target indeed.. | 16:39 | |
spinclad | think so | ||
[particle | |||
oop | 16:40 | ||
fglock | cmarcelo: please see this pugs.blogs.com/photos/visiolization...strap.html | ||
lambdabot | Title: Visiolization: Mp6bootstrap | ||
16:40
diotalevi left
|
|||
spinclad | [particle] would know, he works in parrot and talks here | 16:40 | |
cmarcelo | k | ||
fglock: today's mp6 uses PCR to regex processing? | |||
fglock | no, it uses it's own bootstrapped regex engine | 16:41 | |
the mp6 regex engine is written in mp6 | |||
as well as the grammar compiler | 16:42 | ||
cmarcelo | in the picture you sent, mp6->haskell | generate haskell code, is this indeed a target? | ||
fglock | not anymore, | ||
the idea is that we can simply generate pugs code | |||
cmarcelo | fglock: what do you think about generating PAST, if there are tools for PAST ~~> (PASM|PIR)? | ||
fglock | which ends up in haskell land ultimately | 16:43 | |
same thing, | |||
we can generate p6parrot instead | |||
which is much higher level | |||
Lorn | fglock: everything was did in p6 need to pass to haskell for pugs? | 16:44 | |
fglock | so we can concentrate on writing 6-on-6, instead of the several backend details | ||
Lorn: yes, everything end either on haskell or perl5 | |||
[particle] is here, briefly | |||
fglock | [particle]: hi :) | ||
[particle] | howdy | 16:45 | |
cmarcelo | [particle]: moose.. are there tools today that transform PAST into POST, POST into PASM and POST into PIR? | ||
Lorn | fglock: but first, need to work fine in p6 rigth? | ||
16:45
Southen_ joined,
andara left
|
|||
cmarcelo | fglock: what do you mean by p6parrot? what's the difference between making mp6 generate PAST? | 16:46 | |
[particle] | cmarcelo: we have hll --pge--> parse --tge--> past --tge--> post --tge--> pir | ||
we've been working on post --> pbc, too | |||
fglock | cmarcelo: p6parrot is parrot's perl6 | ||
[particle] | we haven't done post --> pasm, because pir is much better :) | ||
fglock | it is an "hll" | 16:47 | |
[particle] | however, it wouldn't be *hard* to do, if desired | ||
we're also thinking about renaming our perl 6 impl to 'onion' | |||
that should ease some confusion | |||
fglock | "onion" then :) | ||
cmarcelo confused. what PIR mean then? I thought Pugs intermediate representation was this PIR.. | |||
moritz | cmarcelo: Parrot, not Pugs ;-) | 16:48 | |
[particle] | parrot intermediate language (or representation, if you like acronyms that match) | ||
pugs has PIL | |||
pugs intermediate representation ;) | |||
cmarcelo | [particle]: the VM itself runs PIR code or only pbc? | ||
[particle] | the compiler, imcc, compiles pir and executes it | ||
the vm has a bytecode loader for pbc | 16:49 | ||
cmarcelo | hmm.. Pugs-IL is at same level of abstraction as Parrot-IL, or more like PAST? | ||
[particle] | alternately, imcc can produces bytecode instead of running it directly | ||
cmarcelo | [particle]: nice.. | ||
[particle] | pugs-il is like past | ||
past is the place you should target | |||
it's the point of greatest abstraction | 16:50 | ||
16:50
buetow joined
|
|||
[particle] | it's equally abstracted from HLLs and VMs | 16:50 | |
it's also a good place to transform from another AST to PAST or vice versa | 16:51 | ||
[particle] wanders off, bbi15m | |||
eden_c | fglock, (ot) are we getting wireless at FISL? | ||
16:53
fglock joined
|
|||
fglock | 6-on-6 ILs are v6.pm, pugs, and onion :) | 16:53 | |
Lorn | eden_c: in the last year we had wireless | ||
fglock | eden_c: yes | ||
spinclad | fglock, [particle]: so p6parrot is closer to mp6 than PAST is, and p6parrot already targets PAST internally, as it were? | ||
perlmonkey2 | No one in #perl knew, but maybe someone here will (since it isn't in the docs). Do you call/set Moose destructors like explicit destructors in p6? | 16:54 | |
fglock | spinclad: yes, and p6parrot is meant to evolve into full-perl6 | 16:55 | |
spinclad | perlmonkey2: if someone here doesn't know, try #moose | ||
fglock | perlmonkey2: you don't need to call the destructors | ||
perlmonkey2 | life is full of wants with very few actual needs. | ||
16:56
justatheory joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r15826 | moritz++ | Added testcase for 1i ~~ Num | 16:56 | |
fglock | but DESTROY should just work | ||
s/p6parrot/onion/ | |||
perlmonkey2 | thanks | ||
spinclad | fglock, others: how far apart are mp6 and onion? do we have docs that can tell us that around? | 16:58 | |
pasteling | "evalbot_r15825" at 194.145.200.126 pasted "Pugs build failure" (316 lines, 17.2K) at sial.org/pbot/24003 | ||
fglock | spinclad: I don't know :( | 16:59 | |
16:59
cmarcelo_ joined
|
|||
spinclad | guess that's what we're to find out and converge | 16:59 | |
cmarcelo_ | (machine troubles...) | 17:00 | |
fglock | the architectures are very different, and the feature set is probably different too | ||
17:01
cmarcelo_ is now known as cmarcelo
17:03
bernhard joined
|
|||
cmarcelo | fglock: I still don't get how p6parrot (as you call) is different from doing mp6->past and working on top of mp6... | 17:04 | |
fglock | cmarcelo: same thing, but mp6-onion should be easier to implement | 17:05 | |
Lorn | what is onion? :P | ||
[particle] | back | ||
fglock | Lorn: onion = perl6-on-parrot | 17:06 | |
Lorn | fglock: tks | ||
fglock | cmarcelo: onion is a higher level target | ||
cmarcelo | higher than PAST? | 17:07 | |
[particle] | onion is perl 6 syntax, with a parrot back end | ||
past is an abstract syntax tree | |||
*the abstract syntax tree for parrot | 17:08 | ||
all hlls on parrot may (but don't have to) use past | |||
parrot provides a compiler toolchain called 'partridge' for hll developers | 17:09 | ||
17:09
ruoso joined
|
|||
[particle] | pgc is the parrot grammar compiler, using pge, which helps hll developers write hll parsers | 17:09 | |
fglock | .oO( we needed [particle] at the hackathon ) |
||
[particle] | then the hll developer uses tge (tree grammar engine) to generate past | ||
17:10
ozo_ joined
|
|||
[particle] | partridge has already written converters for past -> post -> pbc (or pir) | 17:10 | |
so once a hll developer has emitted past, his job is basically done | |||
then it's time to document, and write tests :) | 17:11 | ||
cmarcelo | recap: so the idea is make a mp6 use 'partridge', and build p6p6 on top of mp6? or drop mp6 at all? | 17:12 | |
[particle]: thanks for the explanation. | |||
[particle] | you're welcome! | ||
fglock | cmarcelo: mp6->onion->partridge->... | 17:13 | |
spinclad | is p6parrot/onion found in languages/perl6 in the parrot tree? | 17:14 | |
fglock | and then: 6-on-6 -> onion -> partridge or 6-on-6 -> partridge | ||
moritz | spinclad: yes, in languages/perl6 | 17:15 | |
spinclad: it's not yet renamed to onion | |||
spinclad | right, we just heard it renamed here | ||
[particle] | onion is the proposed name, but it's gaining some traction here :) | ||
it's not yet passing 01-sanity tests | 17:16 | ||
cmarcelo | fglock: so onion exists already, and implements a sufficient subset of 'Perl 6'? sufficient = enough to satisfy mp6 backend needs.. | ||
fglock | yep | ||
[particle] | cmarcelo: i'm not sure it implements that subset, yet. fglock, are you sure? | ||
i don't know the mp6 requirements well enough | 17:17 | ||
moritz | fglock: even though onion doesn't support variables yet? | ||
fglock | mp6 doesn't need much - closures, basically | ||
cmarcelo wonders if Parrot will compile in his amd64 machine... (I've tried few times before and "bad" things happened) | |||
[particle] | onion supports variables | ||
it doesn't support hashes, or arrays (maybe) or BEGIN/END blocks | 17:18 | ||
fglock | mp6 needs basic OO, but even this can be made optional | ||
moritz | [particle]: then STATUS is outdate | ||
[particle] | parrot's object model implementation is moving forward very quickly | ||
it's meta, and tres cool | 17:19 | ||
cmarcelo | fglock: recap v2 => mp6 ~> onion, p6p6 built on top of mp6, regex compiler on top of mp6.. those are the tasks listed so far? | ||
fglock | BEGIN/END are implemented at mp6-land :) | ||
17:19
eumenides joined
|
|||
[particle] | fglock: yay!@ | 17:19 | |
fglock | cmarcelo: yes | ||
pasteling | "moritz" at 80.193.211.68 pasted "Variables in onion - what's wrong?" (5 lines, 57B) at sial.org/pbot/24004 | 17:20 | |
cmarcelo | fglock: ok. questions: mp6 code is a subset of p6? mp6-code is valid p6-code? what's missing in Pugs p6 that's needed to run mp6? | 17:21 | |
fglock | cmarcelo: some mp6 constructs are syntax errors in pugs; I'm not sure if these are actual errors or not | 17:22 | |
cmarcelo | hmm.. are they syntax errors from Perl 6 point of view? or your not sure about this? | 17:23 | |
fglock | I'm not sure if it is valid syntax, such as: my $v = MyClass( value => 1 ) | ||
my $v = ::MyClass( value => 1 ) | 17:24 | ||
a simple refactoring would fix it, but I'm not sure if this is a syntax error or a pugs error | 17:25 | ||
17:25
eden_c joined
|
|||
fglock | I think it was "conjectural" at the time mp6 was implemented | 17:26 | |
17:26
prism joined
|
|||
fglock | so running mp6 on pugs is likely doable at the hackathon | 17:27 | |
mp6 on onion would be nice-to-have | |||
cmarcelo | fglock: ok. I have to go now. could you "summarize" our discussion and post to cascavel-pm | pugs-compiler? or make a page on dev.pugscode.org, so we can keep track of the possible tasks... | 17:28 | |
fglock | ok | ||
[particle] | moritz: i need to rebuild parrot to check.... | ||
moritz | [particle]: ok | ||
cmarcelo | is it "safe" to do a 'make install' in parrot? | 17:29 | |
[particle] | cmarcelo: it should be | ||
there have been reports of failures, but we're trying to fix them all | 17:30 | ||
you know how that goes :) | |||
eden_c | it complains about not being able to develop it on the same machine | ||
spinclad | fglock: does mp6 assume native hashes and arrays? that could be an obstacle, and a best 'next feature' for onion | 17:31 | |
[particle] | there are some lingering problems about finding shared libraries. parrot may find your installed lib before your dev one, which can lead to segfaults, obviously | ||
fglock | spinclad: yes, it does | ||
cmarcelo | [particle]: same complaint here. changing perspective: how do I run "perl6.pir" w/ uninstalled parrot ? | ||
[particle] | cd languages/perl6 && ..\..\parrot perl6.pbc | 17:32 | |
it should be in the pod, as well: perldoc perl6.pir | |||
cmarcelo | imcc wasn't compiled after 'perl Configure.pl; make', is this expected? | 17:33 | |
[particle] | @tell TimToady now that we have # todo :foo<bar> and # skip, i'd like to see # spec :PDD15<Role PMC API/=item add_method> | ||
lambdabot | Consider it noted. | ||
spinclad | parrot of course has native hashes and arrays, even perl6-flavor more or less, if i recall rightly; it would be the new syntax and parsing to PAST that's needed i would guess | 17:34 | |
17:34
maxy7 joined
|
|||
[particle] | past is missing iterator support, iirc | 17:35 | |
cmarcelo | [particle]: imcc wasn't compiled after 'perl Configure.pl; make', is this expected? | ||
(perl6.pir complains about imcc not being found) | 17:36 | ||
[particle] | compilers/imcc should be compiled, but it's not standalone | ||
you run parrot -o foo.pbc foo.pir # this runs imcc | |||
17:38
sunnavy joined,
Jedai joined
|
|||
cmarcelo | running this I get: 'imcc no such file or directory'.. I have to run now.. I'll try more later, thanks folks. | 17:40 | |
17:41
the_dormant joined
|
|||
eden_c | I'm getting the same here | 17:41 | |
[particle] | have you created a file named foo.pir with pir code inside it? | ||
or, do you mean you're running perl6 and it's failing with that message? | 17:42 | ||
eden_c | can't I run the perl6.pir? | ||
[particle] | did you run make in languages/perl6? | ||
eden_c | hm, no | ||
[particle] | aha! | ||
cd languages/perl6 && nmake all test | 17:43 | ||
eden_c | the installed version of parrot didn't work for me | ||
svnbot6 | r15827 | fglock++ | v6/yapc-sa-hackathon.txt - task ideas | 17:44 | |
cmarcelo | [particle]: I tried with perl6.pir.. I thought foo.pir was like file.pir :o) | ||
17:44
tuna joined
|
|||
cmarcelo | see you later & | 17:44 | |
fglock++ # summary of ideas :) | |||
17:47
IllvilJa joined
|
|||
eden_c | [particle], 5 test scripts failed | 17:48 | |
17:50
Psyche^ joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r15828 | audreyt++ | * Snapshot merge of the pad branch into trunk. | 17:52 | |
r15828 | audreyt++ | Tests mostly passes; YAML compression is turned off for now | |||
r15828 | audreyt++ | which results in slower startups, but otherwise it's functioning | |||
r15828 | audreyt++ | as specced. | |||
r15828 | audreyt++ | However, need another two solid days of work before the entire | |||
r15828 | audreyt++ | separate-compilation model and class/role composers work, for | |||
r15828 | audreyt++ | releng to start and the tree to be labelled as Pugs 6.28.0. | |||
r15828 | audreyt++ | Problem is: I'm probably not getting two solid days of sanity for | |||
r15828 | audreyt++ | work any time soon, so the next commit will revert this merge. | |||
r15828 | audreyt++ | This commit is merely for safeguard so the code lives in somewhere | |||
r15828 | audreyt++ | else than my (dangerously ephemeral) laptop. Sorry. | |||
moritz | audreyt++ # back to #perl6 ;-) | 17:53 | |
geoffb | moritz: yeah, but it sounds like only for a moment. | ||
Which makes me very sad. | |||
wolverian | maybe someone could pick it up :) | 17:54 | |
svnbot6 | r15829 | audreyt++ | * Revert r15828 as promised. | ||
gaal | audreyt.moose.moose.moose | 17:56 | |
[particle] | moose audreyt? | 17:58 | |
17:58
maxyeung joined
|
|||
[particle] | audreyt has 111 mooses | 17:58 | |
:) | |||
where's moosebot? | |||
ISAGN | |||
moritz | [particle]: moosebot? I've never seen that? | 17:59 | |
[particle] | ISAGN: i see a great need | ||
moose is the new karma :) | |||
gaal.moose.moose | 18:00 | ||
wolverian | heh | ||
that might get annoying.moose.moose. | |||
if people get repeating it.moose.moose | |||
s/get/keep/.moose.moose | 18:01 | ||
moritz | ?eval "moose" x 10 | ||
18:01
evalbot_r15825 is now known as evalbot_r15829
|
|||
evalbot_r15829 | "moosemoosemoosemoosemoosemoosemoosemoosemoosemoose" | 18:01 | |
moritz | ?eval "moose" xx 10 | ||
evalbot_r15829 | ("moose", "moose", "moose", "moose", "moose", "moose", "moose", "moose", "moose", "moose") | ||
18:01
Psyche^ is now known as Patterner
|
|||
[particle] | which is more moose, the moose, or the moose who mooses her? | 18:01 | |
moritz | wolverian: beeing nerds we don't have to annoy ourselfes, we can let bots do the job | 18:02 | |
[particle] | laziness.moose.moose | ||
wolverian | moritz, that's moose. | ||
18:05
snoop0x7b joined
18:06
Jedai joined,
tokuhirom is now known as toku_away
|
|||
lichtkind | moritz: Tokens (keyword: token) are regexes that perform low-level non-backtracking (by default) pattern matching. | 18:19 | |
dev.perl.org/perl6/doc/design/syn/S...st_binding | |||
lambdabot | Title: Synopsis 6: Subroutines - perl6:, tinyurl.com/pfpph | ||
devbot6 | planet6: Audrey Tang: YAPC::Asia slides. <pugs.blogs.com/pugs/2007/04/yapcasi...s.html> | 18:22 | |
gaal | audreyt: are you in tokyo? say hi to brad from lj if you see him :) | 18:42 | |
better yet, say moose | |||
oh, my. someone posted to the haskell list about "Fixpoint combinator without recursion". (1 +) evolution | 18:46 | ||
prly_ | ?eval sub f($a,$b){$a+$b}; my $v=1; my &bar:=&f.assuming(a=>$v); $v=5; bar(b=>$v) | 19:07 | |
evalbot_r15829 | 10 | ||
prly_ | hum | ||
i would have expected 6 | |||
currying doesn't seem very useful like that | |||
Tene | ?eval sub f($a,$b){$a+$b}; my $v=1; my &bar:=&f.assuming(a=>$v); say bar(5);$v=10;say bar(5); | 19:08 | |
evalbot_r15829 | OUTPUT[6ā¤15ā¤] Bool::True | ||
gaal | in Perl 5, at least, closure has visible effect at scope exit | 19:09 | |
that is, the assuming closed on $v, not on the value 1 | |||
you changed v while still in the same scope, so it's correct that the closure sees the change | 19:10 | ||
(there is no functional language parallel, because you can't mutate variables there...) | |||
19:14
jisom joined
|
|||
geoffb | Sheesh, Debian Etch version of evince *hates* audreyt's new slides | 19:20 | |
gaal | they're heavy even with acrobat on windoes | 19:30 | |
*windows | |||
19:30
devogon joined
19:33
the_dormant joined
|
|||
moritz | geoffb: they look decently with xpdf (afaict) | 19:35 | |
19:36
the_dormant joined
|
|||
geoffb | moritz: thanks, installing it now | 19:36 | |
19:37
ofer joined
19:38
tuna joined
|
|||
geoffb | Oh cripes, that is *much* more sane | 19:39 | |
Thanks, moritz! | |||
19:39
forsaken joined
|
|||
moritz | geoffb: np ;-) | 19:39 | |
geoffb | Debian++ # That package doesn't work? Here, try another. We've got twenty thousand of them! | 19:40 | |
moritz | geoffb: Debian++ indeed, though I still wait for the ++ in the version number ;-) | 19:43 | |
geoffb | moritz: NODNODNOD | ||
19:44
jisom_ joined
|
|||
moritz | apt-cache search .|wc -l | 19:44 | |
18906 | |||
scary ;-) | |||
19:46
eden_c joined
|
|||
geoffb | moritz: but also happy making. | 19:51 | |
Except when I can't figure out which one of several options to try first. | |||
moritz | geoffb: of course ;-) | ||
geoffb: that's why I want popcon integration into apt-cache search results | 19:52 | ||
geoffb: to tell me which packages are "standard" | |||
geoffb | moritz: not a bad idea. | ||
Frankly, I'd be happy to have dpkg -l integrated in a-c s results | |||
So that I know "oh, right, I already have that one installed" | 19:53 | ||
without two steps | |||
19:53
ozo joined
|
|||
moritz | geoffb: good idea as well... did you submit a wishlist bug report? | 19:54 | |
googlebot seems to strangely love my pugs-doc debian packages... it downloads them over and over again ;-) | 19:55 | ||
19:55
Aankhen`` joined
|
|||
geoffb | moritz: nope - because the last time I suggested it the answer was "oh, use a gui" | 19:56 | |
moritz | geoffb: not the kind of answer I'd like to get ;( | ||
geoffb | moritz: agreed. | 19:57 | |
eden_c | is it normal for pugs to fail a few tests? | 19:58 | |
moritz | eden_c: hundrets ;-) | ||
eden_c | but, I can still play around with it right? | 19:59 | |
moritz | eden_c: only for the releases the faling testcases are marked :todo | ||
eden_c: ofyes | |||
?eval say capititalize "have fun" | |||
evalbot_r15829 | Error: No such subroutine: &capititalize | ||
moritz | ?eval say capitalize "have fun" | 20:00 | |
evalbot_r15829 | OUTPUT[Have Funā¤] Bool::True | ||
eden_c | :) | ||
20:01
forsaken joined
20:08
dduncan joined
|
|||
masak | audreyt: is that zapfino in the slides? it looks stylish. | 20:12 | |
20:28
HiTech69 joined
20:40
riffraff joined
21:04
ajs_home joined
21:05
ajs_home left
21:24
offby1 joined
|
|||
dduncan | question about Perl 6 Microgrants ... Leon posted that the second one was awarded, but I don't recall reading about the first being awarded ... when did that happen? | 21:36 | |
21:38
DarkWolf84 left
21:39
DarkWolf84 joined
|
|||
allbery_b | I vaguely recall seeing it go by on the list but don't recall when or details | 21:39 | |
moritz | I'm pretty sure it was not on p6-language | 21:40 | |
21:41
nxu7-wrk joined
21:46
cmarcelo joined,
CardinalNumber joined
|
|||
dduncan | before today's announcement, I only saw announced that there was going to be microgrants, and discussion of what-ifs | 22:00 | |
PerlJam | The first was speters wasn't it? | 22:05 | |
making parrot more portable | |||
use.perl.org/article.pl?sid=07/03/26/1745205 | |||
lambdabot | Title: use Perl | Perl 6 Microgrant - Steve Peters on Parrot Portability | ||
22:09
ProperNoun joined
22:24
perlmonkey2 left
|
|||
dduncan | thank you ... I think the problem is that it didn't come on the mailing lists, where I usually communicate save for IRC | 22:24 | |
TimToady | @messages | 22:25 | |
lambdabot | audreyt said 22d 11h 24m 1s ago: S02:1438 seems to overrule S06:194 (which was earlier text.) Is it okay if I update both to say that &-sigil fallback to global by default, but no other sigils do? | ||
audreyt said 22d 11h 21m 30s ago: logical consequence is that multi sub dispatch in lexical context should do a lookup to GLOBAL and include those variants, too, for &*infix:<+> to work. | |||
[particle] said 4h 51m 39s ago: now that we have # todo :foo<bar> and # skip, i'd like to see # spec :PDD15<Role PMC API/=item add_method> | |||
PerlJam | dduncan: I've found it useful to watch use.perl.org, mailing lists, perlmonks, and TPF news :) | ||
dduncan: (and, of course, IRC) | 22:26 | ||
dduncan | okay | ||
22:33
deq` joined
|
|||
geoffb | ETOOMANYINFOSOURCES | 22:36 | |
TimToady, when does the spec for the Perl 6 Wetware Interface get written, eh? | 22:37 | ||
I want to be able to filter the feeds to my brain | |||
Using a nice convenient syntax, no less. | |||
TimToady | already specced, for the most part, if you use the electromagnetic inferface | 22:38 | |
*interface | 22:39 | ||
though we haven't specced which colors should be used. :) | |||
now, if you want the Wetware VM, that's a slightly trickier matter (no pun intended) | 22:40 | ||
Tene | 4color3Forth! | ||
22:51
[particle] joined
22:52
cognominal joined
|
|||
snoop0x7b | TimToady the question of course will be which cpan package will the bodily functions fall under | 23:03 | |
moritz | on which unicode level do regexes usually operate? code points? | 23:22 | |
geoffb | moritz: I believe it's "whatever is the current default", which I seem to recall is graphemes, but my memory may be fuzzy there | 23:27 | |
moritz | geoffb: any idea how to change that setting? | 23:28 | |
geoffb | Isn't it 'use codepoints;' or somesuch? It's been a long time since I last looked at that part of the spec .... | 23:33 | |
23:36
fridim joined
23:53
BooK joined
23:58
nxu7-wrk joined
|