Think twice before running "make install" for Pugs | moritz.faui2k3.org/irclog/ | pugscode.org | sial.org/pbot/perl6 | ?eval [~] <m oo se> | We do Haskell, too | > reverse (show (scanl (*) 1 [1..] !! 4)) | "Perl 6 Today" video from YAPC::Asia: xrl.us/v6op Set by agentzh on 6 May 2007. |
|||
TimToady_ | probably is considering each statement a separate scope | 00:01 | |
00:01
TimToady_ is now known as TimToady
|
|||
Tene | *nod* | 00:02 | |
japhb | OK, I think I've got the smoking gun for my problem: | ||
pugs> class Foo { has %.bar; method add_baz { %.bar<baz> = 'quux' } } my $foo = Foo.new; $foo.add_baz; say $foo.bar<baz>; | 00:03 | ||
quux | |||
pugs> class Foo { has %.bar; method init { .add_baz; } method add_baz { %.bar<baz> = 'quux' } } my $foo = Foo.new; $foo.init; say $foo.bar<baz>; | |||
(That's a blank line there at the end) | |||
TimToady | why would method init have $_ set to self? | 00:04 | |
japhb | Ah! So my code depended on now-dead syntax? | ||
TimToady | not dead, just means something other than $.add_baz | ||
japhb | Ah, so if I change all .method to $.method, it should work again? | 00:05 | |
TimToady | in theory | ||
japhb | pugs> class Foo { has %.bar; method init { $.add_baz; } method add_baz { %.bar<baz> = 'quux' } } my $foo = Foo.new; $foo.init; say $foo.bar<baz>; | ||
quux | |||
EXCELLENT | |||
TimToady | or declare all your invocants to be named $_ | ||
japhb | with 'method init($_:) { ... }' ? | 00:06 | |
TimToady | yes, but I'm not recommending it... | ||
japhb | Oh, of course not, just making sure I'm halfway up on current syntax. | 00:07 | |
TimToady | it's an invariant that <ws>.foo means $_.foo | ||
and methods no longer set $_ to invocant | |||
so you have to use either self.foo or $.foo | |||
japhb will probably use the latter -- I really hate P5's constant $self->foo, because it fills the left column of text with repeated meaninglessness, forcing the important part into the middle of a visually dense mess | 00:09 | ||
dduncan | I'm not sure if this was previously declared universal or just certain platforms, but I also get "user error" concerning the prelude | 00:10 | |
japhb | dduncan: seems universal | 00:11 | |
At least, win2k and debian | |||
dduncan | I've got Mac OS X PPC 10.4.9 | ||
japhb | And there we go. | ||
TimToady | I didn't get it on my windows 2000 pro | 00:12 | |
dduncan | where I got it was mid-way through "make" around the precompiling prelude ... but make didn't die and carried on until completion | ||
running ./pugs says "loading prelude ... done" | 00:13 | ||
japhb | OK, gotta run for a bit. Will do the s/.foo/$.foo/g later and restest .... | ||
dduncan | so maybe the message I saw didn't actually affect anything important | ||
japhb | & # Mmm, dinner ... | ||
Aankhen`` | Is $.foo interchangeable with @.foo and %.foo for non-accessor methods, or is there something special about $.foo? | 00:14 | |
dduncan | anyway, now starting "make smoke" ... | ||
and that did die ... | 00:15 | ||
Aankhen`` | Awww. | ||
dduncan | no viable module found: syntax error at (eval 5) line 1, next token ??? | 00:16 | |
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at ./util/yaml_harness.pl line 6. | |||
Could not run yaml harness: at util/run-smoke.pl line 92. | |||
00:16
theorbtwo joined
|
|||
TimToady | my smoke was a little slower, but not 2x slower | 00:17 | |
00:17
jrockway joined
|
|||
dduncan | could my last problem be caused by an older prerequisite Perl 5 module? | 00:17 | |
TimToady | (linux smoke, that is) | ||
yes, there were yaml changes not so long ago | 00:18 | ||
dduncan | so I'll try the latest YAML::Syck and try again ... | ||
00:19
stevan_ joined,
edenc joined
|
|||
dduncan | ... or I think it was actually just YAML that I had before ... unless Pugs can use either, or just Syck now | 00:22 | |
looking ... | |||
yaml harness seems to accept either YAML::Syck 0.85+, or any YAML version, but I have a YAML installed ... | 00:25 | ||
00:25
DarkWolf84 joined
|
|||
dduncan | version 0.39 | 00:25 | |
TimToady | I know I had to upgrade my YAML::Syck to 0.85 | 00:27 | |
dduncan | well, I'm going to use that now | 00:28 | |
installing YS 0.85 did the trick ... smoke is now running numbers ... | 00:33 | ||
TimToady | afk & | 00:35 | |
00:43
polettix is now known as poletti
00:45
poletti is now known as polettix
00:49
nipotaway is now known as nipotan
00:51
edenc joined
00:52
edenc joined
01:03
hatsuseno is now known as crashmatrix
|
|||
Aankhen`` | @tell agentzh I was just looking at smartlinks.pl again, and I was wondering why you explicitly set .smartlink_snippet { display: block; }, since it's a `div`, i.e. it's already a block-level element with a corresponding style. Was it showing up as an inline element for you? | 01:04 | |
lambdabot | Consider it noted. | ||
01:04
crashmatrix is now known as hatsuseno
01:05
SubStack joined
|
|||
QtPlatypus wonders how difficult it would be to do stream fusion in perl6. Or even if it is possable. | 01:13 | ||
01:20
kcwu joined
|
|||
jrockway | stream fusion? | 01:27 | |
wolverian | trn's keys are supposed to do the right thing in each context--so why does 'q' quit the pager _and_ the thread selector in one go? I just wanted to quit the pager! | 01:30 | |
sorry, ww :) | 01:31 | ||
dduncan | I have a question: Supposedly The Perl Foundation holds the copyright on Perl 6, but what does that mean in practice? | ||
AFAIK, no part of Pugs is copyrighted to them | |||
SamB | it means they own the ends of the world | 01:32 | |
wolverian | they own the perl onion trademark. dunno about copyright. | ||
whoh, perl is licensed under gpl _v1_ ? | 01:33 | ||
jrockway | perl is old | ||
dduncan | TPF's web site says they "hold the copyright on Perl 6 and Parrot" | ||
wolverian | jrockway, yeah. :) | ||
jrockway | there's no such thing as perl 6 though | ||
it's a spec | |||
wolverian | about time for artistic 2 | ||
jrockway | i guess they own the spec | ||
anything that passes the spec can be called perl6 though | |||
dduncan | my own guess is what they mean is that they own copyright on the Perl 6 spec plus the Parrot implementation | ||
the question is whether that is actually true or not | 01:34 | ||
jrockway | right now the parrot+perl6 is in the parrot tree, right | ||
i assume they think they own everything in parrot svn | |||
i think the thing we signed said something like that | |||
(i was drunk when i signed it :D) | |||
dduncan | afaik, they sponsored people to write the Perl 6 specs, and parts of parrot, so that would be a reasonable claim ... but afaik they never sponsored any Pugs development, which was done "for fun" | 01:35 | |
jrockway | who knows what TPF is up to :) | 01:37 | |
01:37
Tene is now known as tenen
|
|||
jrockway | i think we should start YATPF :) | 01:37 | |
i'm not too keen on someone owning trademarks on free software | 01:38 | ||
but then... that's not my decision to make | |||
01:39
thoughtpolice joined
01:41
ggoebel joined
|
|||
obra | Nobody claims ownership of pugs. | 02:02 | |
TPF does not claim ownership of pugs. | |||
jrockway. great way to find out what TPF is up to is to volunteer. | |||
one point of an organization like tpf owning the trademarks is to make sure that you don't see someone ELSE owning the trademark and starting to sue. | 02:03 | ||
jrockway | obra: any suggestions on what i can do to volunteer | 02:04 | |
tenen | ?eval "foo foo" ~~ /(ident) <ws> $1/ | 02:05 | |
evalbot_r16421 | *** Cannot parse regex: (ident) <ws> $1ā¤*** Error: ā¤Match.new(ā¤ ok => Bool::False, ā¤ from => 0, ā¤ to => 0, ā¤ str => "", ā¤ sub_pos => (), ā¤ sub_named => {}ā¤) | ||
tenen | ?eval "foo foo" ~~ /(<ident>) <ws> $1/ | ||
evalbot_r16421 | *** Cannot parse regex: (<ident>) <ws> $1ā¤*** Error: ā¤Match.new(ā¤ ok => Bool::False, ā¤ from => 0, ā¤ to => 0, ā¤ str => "", ā¤ sub_pos => (), ā¤ sub_named => {}ā¤) | ||
obra | jrockway: helping to write up perl success stories for press releases is one thing that I keep hearing about. | 02:06 | |
jrockway | i don't have a lot of perl success stories; most of my work is just OSS stuff | ||
i think i've written 20 lines of code at work in the last 2 months or so :) | 02:07 | ||
obra | ...not suggesting TPF is not useful and should be replaced is probably another ;) | ||
jrockway: other peoples' perl success stories. see the recent discussion on l.pm | |||
jrockway | TPF is just a little too slow-moving for my tastes... the grant program is fine though | 02:09 | |
little things like planet perl being python powered with we have plagger... etc. | 02:10 | ||
i don't really care though | |||
obra | ok. what bits about TPF are too slow moving for you? | ||
jrockway | well, we missed the SoC deadline for this year IIRC? | ||
and there's been plans for a perl.org calendar forever | 02:11 | ||
obra | that has NOTHING to do with TPF being too slow moving. | ||
jrockway | events calendar | ||
ok | |||
obra | and tpf DID submit | ||
Google chose not to accept tpf's application | |||
great. perhaps you could help with making the event calendar happen? | |||
jrockway | sure | 02:12 | |
obra | I've never heard anything about it. | ||
jrockway | i don't know what was holding it up before | ||
i will find out | |||
obra | excellent | ||
jrockway | software, perhaps | ||
obra | well, brian foy is keeping a public google calendar of perlish events. | 02:13 | |
oh. no | |||
it's cog | |||
icalx.com/public/cog/perl.community.ics | |||
jrockway | i think we need a sidebar on perl.org (like php.net) | 02:14 | |
obra | Great. jump on it. | 02:15 | |
jrockway | k | ||
02:16
justatheory joined
02:18
Aankhen`` joined
|
|||
Aankhen`` | Pugs build failed. :-( | 02:19 | |
Going to pastebin, waiting for Firefox to open. | |||
pasteling | "Aankhen" at 24.80.73.85 pasted "Pugs build failure on Debian" (747 lines, 50K) at sial.org/pbot/24955 | 02:24 | |
Aankhen`` | I've pasted the entire log in case there's anything of help. | ||
The relevant portion, of course, is at the end. It fails on Pugs.Help, saying "error: Parrot_hsc.h: No such file or directory". | |||
dduncan | my smoke has just done | 02:27 | |
svnbot6 | r16422 | tene++ | Fixes for Net:IRC::OO | ||
dduncan | so the wall clock time for my smoke was just under 2 hours | 02:28 | |
and its result is m19s28.vlinux.de/iblech/stuff/pugs-...5233f.html | 02:29 | ||
lambdabot | Title: TAP Matrix - Fri May 18 02:25:05 2007 GMT, tinyurl.com/26t8ye | 02:30 | |
03:15
mako132_ joined
03:21
bonesss joined,
SCalimlim joined
03:44
mobutu joined
04:10
lisppaste3 joined
04:27
REPLeffect joined
04:30
SubStack joined
04:36
Tene joined
04:40
SubStack joined
04:43
SubStack joined
04:46
araujo joined
05:02
mobutu left
05:09
BooK_ joined
|
|||
spinclad | (pad-rewrite branch merge)++ | 05:15 | |
(audreyt being back)++ | 05:16 | ||
audreyt+ | |||
+ | |||
(spoil my own punchline)-- | |||
audreyt++ | 05:17 | ||
btw, re coolie: my dictionary (Random House college edition, 1968) gives: "[ < Urdu _kūlī_ < Tamil _kūli_ hire, hireling ]" | 05:20 | ||
05:21
jisom joined
|
|||
spinclad | but (a) i can't vouch for its any greater accuracy, and (b) this doesn't rule out the Tamil term deriving from Chinese (unless it fits into the native Tamil web of words). | 05:22 | |
05:25
charsbar_ joined
05:27
sri__ joined
05:42
jisom_ joined
05:45
mjk joined,
SubStack joined
06:19
amnesiac joined
06:26
Averell joined
|
|||
dduncan | TimToady, I just noticed a typo in S02: see the description of the Bag immutable type | 06:26 | |
Tene read that as "Blag"; too much xkcd | |||
dduncan | it says does KeyHash but should say does KeyBag | ||
06:35
weinigLap_ is now known as weinigLap
06:38
kanru joined
06:43
iblechbot joined
07:01
franck__ joined
07:03
bsb left
07:05
devogon joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r16423 | Darren_Duncan++ | ext/QDRDBMS/ : updated Language.pod to add quasi-nonscalar data types, for when plain nonscalar data types just won't do | 07:11 | |
07:20
buetow joined
07:24
SubStack_ joined
07:28
SubStack_ joined
07:29
SubStack_ is now known as SubStack
07:41
weinigLap joined
|
|||
japhb | OK, got another error trying to get some of my 3D code running under the latest pugs: | 07:49 | |
$ ./pugs -e 'use perl5:SDL::OpenGL; my %symbols = eval q{%SDL::OpenGL::}, :lang<perl5>; say %symbols.elems;' | |||
2022 | |||
$ ./pugs -e 'use perl5:SDL::OpenGL; sub foo { my %symbols = eval q{%SDL::OpenGL::}, :lang<perl5>; say %symbols.elems; } foo()' | |||
*** Odd number of elements found where hash expected: VStr "*SDL::OpenGL::" | |||
at -e line 1, column 34-84 | |||
07:50
SCalimlim joined
|
|||
Aankhen`` | Small update: this time it looks like pugs compiled just fine. Going through the smoke now, on t/operators/negated_smartmatch.t | 07:53 | |
Ah man. | 08:09 | ||
I named my file smoker.yml instead of .smoker.yml, so the `smokeserv-client.pl` didn't pick it up. | |||
Hmm, 37.28 min, up from 24 last time. | 08:10 | ||
08:13
drupek12 joined
|
|||
japhb | @tell audreyt Please take a look at moritz.faui2k3.org/irclog/out.pl?ch...18#id_l199 -- that smells like a bug in how the new pads and the Perl 5 bridge interact. This was confirmed to work correctly in the rev immediately before your big merge. | 08:14 | |
lambdabot | Consider it noted. | ||
japhb | @tell audreyt (Or rather, the larger program using this construct was confirmed to work, rather than this test eval per se.) | 08:16 | |
lambdabot | Consider it noted. | ||
08:17
dduncan left
|
|||
japhb | blessed_sleep & # Good night all, and pleasant dreams .... | 08:18 | |
moritz | japhb: good night ;) | ||
08:27
rindolf joined
08:32
laye joined
08:39
ozo joined
08:46
prism joined
09:02
the_dormant joined
09:06
ozo joined
09:26
the_dormant_ joined
09:28
mr_ank joined
09:39
iblechbot joined
|
|||
mr_ank | hey one question... i'm slowly studying parsers. Is there a proof somewhere that perl 6's grammar is syntax-dependent and cannot be reduced to syntax-free? what about perl 5? | 09:41 | |
(i'm reading perl 5's perly.y/toke.c combination as well) | |||
09:47
stef__ joined
09:48
kane_ joined
10:01
buetow joined
|
|||
mr_ank | oops. s/syntax-dependent/context-dependent/ and s/syntax-free/context-free/ | 10:06 | |
moritz | we silently passed revision 2^14, and nobody noticed it ;) | 10:10 | |
mr_ank: I'm not a perl guru, but "proof" and "perl" don't sound as if the fit together very well ;) | |||
10:11
ayrnieu joined
10:17
deq` joined
10:18
the_dormant joined
10:32
lampus_ joined
|
|||
mr_ank | moritz: hehehe. there's proof (in the "perl is very complex, dude!" sense) in places like www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=471598 and www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=44722 | 10:34 | |
lambdabot | Title: Perl not BNF-able?? | ||
mr_ank | I had seen merlyn's post before but didn't know the grammar types until a few minutes ago. | 10:35 | |
Anyway, toke.c/perly.y are proof | 10:41 | ||
gtg | |||
10:47
rindolf joined
|
|||
wolverian | perly.y is relatively sane... and then you open toke.c and run out screaming | 10:48 | |
moritz hopes for a perl6 binary that exports syntax trees cleanly to enable syntax hilighting | 10:50 | ||
11:00
franck__ joined
11:01
chris2 joined
11:16
elmex joined
11:34
fglock joined
11:40
ggoebel joined
11:41
sapir joined
|
|||
fglock | moritz: re cleanly: do you have an example of what it would look like? | 12:04 | |
12:05
ggoebel joined
12:08
fatman joined
|
|||
fatman | hello, i am fat-man and i weigh 400 pounds. you can see video of my supreme fatness at www.fat-man.org | 12:08 | |
12:08
fatman left
|
|||
wolverian | uh, okay. | 12:11 | |
12:13
lumi joined
12:16
nipotan is now known as nipotaway
12:20
tlb joined
12:21
Limbic_Region joined
12:23
buetow joined
12:26
buetow joined
|
|||
Limbic_Region | salutations all | 12:32 | |
12:32
DarkWolf84 joined
12:55
buetow joined,
kanru joined
|
|||
moritz | @tell fglock for syntax hilighting it would be great if a list of tokens [$text, $type] or so would be available - but I guess it's not too hard to construct that from STD.pm | 13:00 | |
lambdabot | Consider it noted. | ||
13:00
rissy joined
13:03
ruoso joined
13:07
zperl joined
13:09
the_dormant joined
13:14
agentzh joined
13:16
stef_ joined
|
|||
agentzh | moose | 13:16 | |
lambdabot | agentzh: You have 3 new messages. '/msg lambdabot @messages' to read them. | ||
agentzh | @messages | 13:17 | |
lambdabot | Aankhen`` said 3d 6h 48m 40s ago: I'm not seeing the load handler run more than once on Firefox; a profiling session shows that it runs once, calling addEvent 83 times (or more, or less, depending | ||
on the number of smartlink snippets). Which browser did you see this behaviour under? | |||
perlDreamer said 2d 9h 25s ago: I think that the closure work is done in t/TASKS, but I'd like to double check with you since you added it. What specific things were you thinking of? | |||
Aankhen`` said 12h 13m 2s ago: I was just looking at smartlinks.pl again, and I was wondering why you explicitly set .smartlink_snippet { display: block; }, since it's a `div`, i.e. it's already a | |||
block-level element with a corresponding style. Was it showing up as an inline element for you? | |||
moritz | what would we do without lambdabot? | 13:22 | |
PerlJam | moritz: we would notice something is missing and create it. | 13:23 | |
agentzh | @tell Aankhen`` i was using the Win32 version of Firefox 1.x and added an "alert('blah');" line to the handler body. The alert function got called many times. | ||
lambdabot | Consider it noted. | ||
moritz | PerlJam: you're right ;) | ||
13:25
ilbot-test joined
13:26
stef_ joined
|
|||
moritz | how do change the case (upper/lower) of a word in vim? | 13:26 | |
[particle] | ~ iirc | 13:27 | |
oh, mayb ethat's a letter | |||
moritz | yes, one letter | ||
blaze-x | ~w? | ||
13:27
fglock joined
|
|||
moritz | ho, that changes one letter, and then moves one word | 13:28 | |
blaze-x | indeed, looking for the right answer, brb :) | ||
moritz | guW | ||
no, gUw to change to uppper case | |||
blaze-x | darn ;p was into g~w :) | ||
moritz | and guw to lower case | 13:29 | |
a, thanks | |||
13:30
stevan_ joined
|
|||
blaze-x | but you'd need to be at the word start, | 13:30 | |
[particle] | b~ might do it | 13:32 | |
13:33
buetow joined
|
|||
[particle] | bgUw | 13:33 | |
agentzh | @tell perlDreamer well, that entry was created in the last summer when i created the t/closure_traits directory and several .t files in it. I'm glad to see many new tests have been added there. feel free to remove the task if you think it's already done :) i'm lacking the tuits right now. | 13:34 | |
lambdabot | Consider it noted. | ||
agentzh | @tell Aankhen`` i'm not an HTML person (unfortunately). "display: block" is mostly a placeholder since i previously wrote "display: none" there to debug the line-anchor stuff. :) | 13:35 | |
lambdabot | Consider it noted. | ||
svnbot6 | r16424 | moritz++ | [irclog] preparations to add a primary key to the database | ||
r16424 | moritz++ | (why didn't I do that in the first place? silly me). | |||
r16424 | moritz++ | whitespace fixes. | |||
13:36
irclogbot joined
|
|||
avar | @telll audreyt Please give me comaint (AVAR) on re::engine::PCRE so I can update it to work with blead (and PCRE 7.*) | 13:39 | |
lambdabot | Consider it noted. | ||
13:41
buetow joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r16425 | rhr++ | [examples/unitsdat-grammar.pl] Add support for num^num, minor cleanups | 13:48 | |
rhr | week-long vacation & | ||
moritz | can somebody tell me if t/operators/precedence.t is the right plae to test the precedence of self defined operators withe the is {looser,equiv,tighter} traits? | 13:50 | |
13:51
sapir joined
|
|||
Limbic_Region | moritz - it might be better to do create a precedence sub-directory t/operators/precedence/foo.t, user.t, etc.t | 14:02 | |
but then again, I had put in 40 hours of work by Wednesday this week and can't be trusted to be thinking coherently | 14:03 | ||
14:08
rlb3_work joined
|
|||
agentzh | Limbic_Region: that sounds like a great idea. | 14:12 | |
i did the same thing for closure traits and it worked out quite well :) | 14:13 | ||
bed & | |||
14:13
agentzh left
14:21
lampus_ is now known as lampus
14:25
stef_ joined
|
|||
moritz | for the moment I continue in precedence.t, and when I'm more motivated or the file grows too large, I'll split it | 14:25 | |
avar | it would probably be better if only builtins were there, but sure, do that:) | ||
ideally the test suite would be in pseudo implementation-dependency-order | 14:26 | ||
but it's really messy:) | |||
moritz | avar: where would non-builtin operators be tested for precedence? | ||
avar | t/operators/precedence/watchimacallit.t | ||
just pick some name and fly with it:) | 14:27 | ||
moritz | ok | 14:28 | |
14:30
bernhard joined
14:31
rhandom joined
|
|||
moritz wonders why he keeps wrting "pubs" instead of "pugs" ;) | 14:31 | ||
Limbic_Region | . o O ( cause it's Friday? ) | 14:34 | |
14:38
the_dormant_ joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r16426 | moritz++ | splitted t/operators/precedence.t in precedence/{builtins,self-defined}.t | 14:42 | |
r16426 | moritz++ | added a more specific tests for prefix/infix/postfix operators. | |||
avar | wohoo:) | 14:44 | |
svnbot6 | r16427 | moritz++ | [irclog] now output is ordered by id, so the correct ordering no longer | 14:46 | |
r16427 | moritz++ | depends on the goodwill of the mysql engine | |||
14:48
REPLeffect joined
14:52
the_dormant joined
15:02
franck__ joined
15:04
rodi joined
15:14
iblechbot joined
|
|||
TimToady | my kitchen linux smoke went from 145 to 172 minutes, 18% slower | 15:15 | |
15:17
amerinese joined,
amerinese left
|
|||
Limbic_Region | Wasn't the pad refactor supposed to make things faster? | 15:18 | |
TimToady | mostly supposed to make things more correct | 15:22 | |
plus audrey had to disable an optimization for lack of support in 6.6; don't know how much effect that had | 15:23 | ||
people with faster machines seem to be getting bigger slowdowns, but not many datapoints on that yet. | 15:26 | ||
I left a smoke running at work on my windows box there, but it never showed up on smokeserver, so I'll have to see whether it didn't complete or just didn't send. | |||
Limbic_Region | I had a build failure and didn't run the smoke | 15:31 | |
I might try again tonight | |||
Limbic_Region wanders off to find food | |||
15:39
pbuetow joined
15:51
bonesss joined
16:00
weinigLap joined
16:02
toshinori joined
16:05
justatheory joined
16:08
deq` joined
16:10
fglock joined,
silug joined
|
|||
Jmax | are there any platforms that are desired to be smoked on? | 16:16 | |
i have a rather large array of virtual machine images | |||
Solaris, OpenBSD, FreeBSD, a few Linuces, SCO, XP, Vista, Windows 2000 come to mind | 16:17 | ||
moritz | openbsd has very little smokes | ||
Jmax | ok | ||
moritz | there is an overview of all available smokes on m19s28.vlinux.de/cgi-bin/pugs-smokeserv.pl | 16:18 | |
lambdabot | Title: Pugs Smoke Reports | ||
Jmax | i wonder if there's a haskell compiler that works on sco | 16:19 | |
16:19
REPLeffect joined
|
|||
[particle] | jmax: any tuits to smoke parrot, too? | 16:20 | |
Jmax | sure :) | ||
[particle] | yay! | ||
Jmax | does parrot come with a nice-and-easy "make smoke"? | 16:21 | |
moritz | I seem to recall that there wereparrot regressions on freebsd | ||
Jmax: of course ;) | |||
[particle] | yes, we've got "make smoke" | ||
it submits to smoke.parrotcode.org/smoke | 16:22 | ||
lambdabot | Title: Parrot Smoke Reports | ||
japhb | [particle]++ # representing parrot here | ||
[particle] | you can see which platforms aren't represented there | ||
svnbot6 | r16428 | fglock++ | [v6-MiniPerl6-JVM] - MiniPerl6 for the Java Virtual Machine | 16:31 | |
r16428 | fglock++ | - "hello.pl" works | |||
[particle] | fglock++ | 16:33 | |
fglock | that's phase III of the World Domination Plan(tm) | 16:34 | |
lambdabot | fglock: You have 1 new message. '/msg lambdabot @messages' to read it. | ||
[particle] | now, to get java to compile to mp6 :) | 16:36 | |
fglock | hmm - not quite there yet | ||
16:40
haelix joined
17:09
Psyche^ joined
|
|||
TimToady | my windows box at work was 32% slower | 17:10 | |
but for some reason did not deign to turn smoke.yml into smoke.html. said it couldn't spawn the perl.exe but couldn't give a good reason why not... | 17:14 | ||
svnbot6 | r16429 | fglock++ | [mp6-jvm] t/01-sanity.t passes | ||
TimToady | will try again to see if it was just a cosmic ray | ||
moritz | fglock++ # multiple backends | 17:15 | |
fglock: do you compile to java code or to jvm byte code? | |||
fglock | moritz: I'm using Groovy - groovy.codehaus.org | ||
lambdabot | Title: Groovy - Home | 17:16 | |
fglock | as an intermediate language | ||
laziness | |||
moritz | cool ;) | 17:17 | |
TimToady | how...OOish | ||
moritz | veraible interpolation without sigils ;) | 17:18 | |
TimToady | we can do that too. :) | ||
you just have to declare your variable as an rw sub... | |||
then say "answer = {mysub}" | 17:19 | ||
moritz | is there anything we can't do with perl 6? | 17:20 | |
Juerd | Perl 5 formats :) | ||
[particle] | parse perl 5 :) | 17:21 | |
TimToady | hmm, still a little weak on logic programming, I expect | ||
moritz | TimToady: that can be left to modules ;) | ||
TimToady | translating toke.c to P6 might be "fun" | ||
Oz claims to support eight paradigms | 17:22 | ||
17:22
Psyche^_ joined
|
|||
obra | TimToady: indeed. I _almost_ convinced muttley that translating toke.c to a subset of perl5 would be worthwhile. | 17:22 | |
[particle] | fglock will have an mp5 before you know it :) | ||
fglock | hmm | 17:23 | |
TimToady | I haven't even figured out how to use mp3's yet... | 17:24 | |
moritz | ;) | ||
TimToady | I wonder where Perl 6 should fit in terms of the paradigms on en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-paradig...g_language | ||
has Perl 5 down for 3 paradigms | 17:25 | ||
Oz: concurrent, constraint, dataflow, distributed, functional (evaluation: eager, lazy), imperative, logic, object-oriented (class-based) | |||
PerlJam | TimToady: Perl 6 needs a new one--inifite paradigms ;) | ||
17:26
Psyche^_ is now known as Patterner
|
|||
fglock | "it lets you implement your own paradigm" | 17:26 | |
TimToady | I think they call that "dialectic" | ||
PerlJam wonders why his fingers don't work well sometimes. | 17:27 | ||
TimToady | but maybe they're thinking in terms of dsl subsets mostly | ||
rindolf | Hi PerlJam, TimToady, fglock [particle], obra | ||
moritz | hi rindolf ;) | ||
rindolf | Hi moritz ! What's up? | ||
PerlJam | Hello rindolf. | ||
rindolf | PerlJam: hi. | ||
PerlJam: what's up? | |||
moritz | rindolf: not mutch... my programs are still are not working ;) | 17:28 | |
PerlJam | rindolf: apparently my fingers can't spell "infinite" without some prodding. | ||
rindolf | moritz: which programs? | ||
moritz | rindolf: I'm writing a program that recognizes eyes in images of human faces... 65% recognition rate only or so | 17:29 | |
rindolf | moritz: oh nice. | 17:35 | |
moritz | rindolf: I'm not yet satisfied | ||
17:35
justatheory joined
|
|||
rindolf | moritz: what are you writing it in? | 17:35 | |
moritz | rindolf: C | 17:36 | |
and in parallel I'm writing a pixel bases weak classifier to detect skin | |||
diakopter | TimToady: which paradigms (of the ones mentioned on that wikipedia page, and any that aren't) would Perl-6-As-Currently-Spec'd support OOTB? | ||
moritz | and I hope someday I can combine it | ||
svnbot6 | r16430 | fglock++ | [mp6-jvm] passes t/02-int.t | 17:39 | |
TimToady | diakopter: it really kinda depends on which of those "paradigms" you consider to be subsets of the others | 17:42 | |
arguably if you have lazy functional, you already have the basis for dataflow | 17:43 | ||
concurrent and distributed are much the same | 17:44 | ||
is class-based OO different from prototype-based OO? | |||
are our roles sufficiently parametric to count as generic programming? | 17:45 | ||
offby1 looks deep within himself | |||
my roles may be insufficiently parametric, but I blame my agent | |||
TimToady | and the set of paradigms there doesn't really use all the paradigms listed under en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programming_paradigm | 17:48 | |
lambdabot | Title: Programming paradigm - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia | ||
TimToady | is AOP a paradigm? DBC? grammar-based programming? | ||
we kinda do all of those | 17:49 | ||
and we certainly do structural programming. :) | 17:50 | ||
not to mention imperative and procedural | |||
at some point the word paradigm starts going wonky on us | |||
17:54
prism joined
17:58
Khisanth joined
18:03
dmq joined
18:04
SubStack joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r16431 | fglock++ | [mp6-jvm] pass t/05-bind.t | 18:06 | |
obra | TimToady: It might be interesting to see a talk on how "These fundamental properties of dynamic languages let you use _all_ n of these programming paradigms nicely. | 18:09 | |
"...And here are the paradigms that you could use, but require conceptual bludgeoning." | 18:10 | ||
"...and here are a few new programming paradigms I made up during the coffee break. If you use them, | |||
[particle] picks up a concept menacingly and looks around... | |||
obra | Damian will hunt you down and make you watch a lecture about object intercal" | ||
TimToady | sure, but then I'd have to do enough research to actually know what I'm talking about, or at least fake it better than I do... | 18:11 | |
diakopter | I bet someone has published a dependency graph somewhere of those properties/categories. | 18:27 | |
18:34
obvio171_ joined
|
|||
obra | TimToady: quite possibly. But people might just believe you ;) | 18:35 | |
18:38
buetow joined
|
|||
jrockway | .PLEASE CREATE AN OBJECT WITH AN ACCESSOR NAMED FOO WHICH ACCESES A READ-ONLY MEMBER CALLED FOO | 18:43 | |
:) | 18:44 | ||
[particle] | what's that, oo-cobol? :) | ||
svnbot6 | r16432 | audreyt++ | * util/gen_prelude.pl: More sensible msg at the end of prelude generation. | ||
18:47
jisom joined
|
|||
avar | audreyt: ! | 18:47 | |
avar bothers | |||
does p6 have something like bless {} => sub {}; ? | 18:49 | ||
svnbot6 | r16433 | audreyt++ | * Pugs.Run: Eliminate the utterly unhelpful and harmless | ||
r16433 | audreyt++ | "user error" message when recompiling prelude. | |||
avar wants his objects to be completely lexical | |||
I know you have lexical classes, hrm | |||
I guess I'm wondering how dispatch ends up and how hackable that is:) | |||
[particle] | should be hackable though the MOP | 18:51 | |
diakopter | TimToady: here's a bit of material for that research www.dmst.aueb.gr/dds/pubs/ his '94 thesis esp. | 18:52 | |
lambdabot | Title: Diomidis Spinellis Publications | ||
18:52
justatheory joined
|
|||
TimToady | maybe you should just ghostwrite my talk :) | 18:52 | |
then I wouldn't have to understand it.... | |||
diakopter | better hope the WG2.8 folks aren't in attendance... | 18:53 | |
18:53
dduncan joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r16434 | audreyt++ | * Prelude: &evalfile should refer to the global &*eval as such, | 19:01 | |
r16434 | audreyt++ | not assuming it's within the lexical scope. | |||
19:21
polettix joined
19:33
REPLeffect joined
19:35
SamB joined
19:37
japhb joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r16435 | audreyt++ | * Pugs.Parser.Util: Add parameter variables into the known-variable | 19:55 | |
r16435 | audreyt++ | set to be closed over. | |||
19:57
the_dormant joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r16436 | audreyt++ | * Pugs.Parser: This error is finally a compile-time one, instead | 20:04 | |
r16436 | audreyt++ | of a runtime one: | |||
r16436 | audreyt++ | Global symbol "$foo" requires explicit package name | |||
r16436 | audreyt++ | As a result, a lot of ext/ code broke -- but they were really | |||
r16436 | audreyt++ | broken already. Fixes welcome! | |||
20:06
baest joined
|
|||
dduncan | oh, I should have a look then ... so far, most of my tests are just that the code compiles | 20:08 | |
on a related note, it seems the compiler hadn't 2 days ago checked that references to attributes actually exist | 20:09 | ||
whereas those should be checkable at compile time ... will test now ... | |||
audreyt, are your commits of today all new work, or are they older stuff that was being checked in now more incrementally? | 20:10 | ||
Jmax | a bit off topic, did anyone get ghc 6.6+ working on openbsd? the port/package are a bit outdated | 20:13 | |
svnbot6 | r16437 | audreyt++ | * Better diagnostics message for undeclared variable. | 20:19 | |
20:25
BooK joined
20:28
justatheory joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r16438 | lwall++ | typo in new error message | 20:31 | |
Tene | dduncan: last night she said she was going to commit more old stuff today. | 20:33 | |
dduncan | I remembered a comment about "another half" of stuff to be committed in the near future, but I don't recall today specifically | 20:34 | |
in any event, still good to see it | |||
fglock | does anyone have a clue of Groovy syntax? I can't make a simple accessor | 20:36 | |
20:38
Aankhen`` joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r16439 | audreyt++ | * Variables inside an eval"" is now correctly checked | 20:40 | |
r16439 | audreyt++ | against outer lexical scope. | |||
20:53
thoughtpolice joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r16440 | Darren_Duncan++ | ext/QDRDBMS/ : fixed a one-line bug in PhysType.pm that newest Pugs uncovered | 20:55 | |
dduncan | and besides that one line, both of my ext/ projects have no compile errors now | 20:56 | |
that make-test reveals | |||
svnbot6 | r16441 | fglock++ | [mp6-jvm] class declarations, constructor, accessors | ||
japhb | I'm just starting to backlog, so forgive me if this has already been mentioned ... but I got a "server too busy" error from irc.pugscode.org. With a refresh, it went away, but that's still worrisome. | ||
moritz | japhb: did you get that response from irc.pugscode.org or from the server that it redirects to? | 20:58 | |
dduncan | I normally use colabti.de/irclogger/irclogger_log/perl6 myself | ||
japhb | moritz: I'm not sure, actually | 21:00 | |
I think maybe the former | |||
svnbot6 | r16442 | audreyt++ | * Pugs.hs - Recover lexical scope continuation in interactive | 21:08 | |
r16442 | audreyt++ | shell, as reported by avar++ | |||
avar doesn't recall | 21:09 | ||
21:11
moglum joined
|
|||
TimToady | I think it was Tene++ | 21:11 | |
21:12
bernhard joined
|
|||
Tene | What was me? | 21:12 | |
21:12
_bernhard joined
|
|||
TimToady | reporting the shell not keeping its lexicals from line to line | 21:12 | |
Tene | Yes, that was me. | 21:13 | |
TimToady | moritz.faui2k3.org/irclog/out.pl?ch...7#id_l1339 | ||
lambdabot | Title: IRC log for #perl6, tinyurl.com/29p8sk | ||
21:18
SubStack joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r16443 | audreyt++ | * Some tidying up for preserving lexicals in interactive shell | 21:19 | |
r16443 | audreyt++ | (which was reported by Tene++ instead of avar++, mea culpa.) | |||
japhb | audreyt: did you have a chance to look at the problem I reported last night? Or is that delayed until after the MO merge? | ||
dduncan | is the MO merge happening today, or some later day? | 21:20 | |
I recall hearing something about instability yesterday | |||
audreyt | dduncan: it's happening not today. I hope early next week but no promises. | 21:21 | |
lambdabot | audreyt: You have 3 new messages. '/msg lambdabot @messages' to read them. | ||
dduncan | okay | 21:22 | |
audreyt | japhb: the eval"" bug? looking at it now | ||
japhb | audreyt: thanks | ||
dduncan | anyway, I still have significant additions to make to QDRDBMS before Pugs goes on CPAN again, so things like this happening later can possibly provide the time | 21:23 | |
aka, blessing in disguise | |||
audreyt | sure :) | ||
dduncan | fyi, I have so far been implementing my data types in terms of Hash and Array, like the Perl 5 versions, because afaik other types like Seq, Mapping, Set don't exist in Pugs yet, and won't until after the MO merge | 21:25 | |
audreyt | japhb: try these two lines in your command line: | ||
./pugs -e 'sub { say eval q[%ENV] :lang<perl5> }()' | |||
./pugs -e '{ say eval q[%ENV] :lang<perl5> }' | 21:26 | ||
or rather, the first line should be | |||
./pugs -e '{ say eval q[%ENV] :lang<perl5> }()' | |||
(same thing either way) | |||
do they output different things? | |||
dduncan | likewise, I'm assuming that being able to use Object as a hash/mapping/set key won't work until after the MO merge | ||
audreyt | correct, and maybe not immediately after that, either | 21:27 | |
japhb | audreyt: first and third are the same (as expected), and give just: '*main::ENV' | ||
dduncan | so I've hacked together my own in the mean time | ||
audreyt | (i.e. not considered a 6.28 blocker) | ||
cool | |||
japhb | audreyt: the third gives a big pile of stuff | ||
er, the *second* | |||
audreyt | japhb: k, so that's the bug. looking into it... | ||
japhb | audreyt: cool | 21:28 | |
dduncan | likewise, I'm assuming that even if I declare desired data types of parameters, that they aren't actually being checked yet, so I still do explicit .does checks on arguments, as in Perl 5 | ||
audreyt | I wonder at which circumstances will perl5 evaluate %ENV into *main::ENV | ||
dduncan: at the moment they affect defaults, but not passed-in args | 21:29 | ||
dduncan | okay | ||
audreyt | sub f (Moose $x?) { ... } # Moose.new if you call f() | ||
japhb | audreyt: can you trace across the Haskell/P5 boundary? I can only imagine it's something like a context change | ||
audreyt | or rather actually ::Moose, not Moose.new | ||
japhb | scalar versus list, or something | ||
audreyt | but %ENV under scalar context is 17/32 | ||
still looking | |||
dduncan | either way, I've generally been treating Pugs' Perl 6 like it is Perl 5 as far as implemented features go, which has led to the code being more verbose ... but that's the cost of wanting it to work now | 21:30 | |
audreyt | nodnod. | ||
dduncan | and I'll refactor it when Pugs implements things that I want | ||
my own assumption so far is that once the MO is in place, implementing the things I want will be orders of magnitude easier, and come along relatively quickly | 21:31 | ||
moritz | just finished a smoke in 40m23 | ||
audreyt | that is correct. | ||
moritz: how much slower was that? I benched here and it's 15% or so slower | |||
dduncan | sounds good | ||
dduncan away for a bit | |||
moritz | audreyt: 45%, but I had some load while smoking this time | 21:33 | |
audreyt | k. will look at performance once the branch merge's glitches are ironed out (there doesn't seem like to be too many of them) | 21:34 | |
japhb: your intuition is entirely correct | |||
%ENV evaluates to *main::ENV under void context | |||
the question is now why this is in void context... | 21:35 | ||
dduncan | my last 2 smokes went from about 90 mins, a few months ago, to about 110 mins yesterday | ||
dduncan away again | |||
audreyt | $ ./pugs -e '{ say want }()' | ||
Void | |||
moritz | is it normal to have failing tests in ext/File-Spec/t/20_win32_test.t on linux? | 21:37 | |
audreyt | it's a bug, but I havn't investigated. | 21:38 | |
svnbot6 | r16444 | audreyt++ | * Make InvokePerl5Result derive Show/Typeable to make | ||
r16444 | audreyt++ | debugging a bit easier. | |||
audreyt | I get it here too | ||
moritz | not very intuitive ;) | ||
audreyt | no ;) | 21:39 | |
21:40
zgh joined
|
|||
thoughtpolice | can anybody offer a reasonable way to get more into perl6/pugs development? i've been reading O'reilly's book and writing little snips of code on my openBSD box via pugs, but the actual implementation and development of it is still somewhat of a mystery; i assume getting a commit bit would be a good start, but i feel as if I'm getting dropped in foreign territory arbitrarily or somesuch | 21:43 | |
PerlJam | thoughtpolice: yes, getting a commit bit would be a good start :-) | ||
svnbot6 | r16445 | moritz++ | ext/File-Util: fixed variable named that caused compiler errors | ||
Tene | thoughtpolice: PM me your email address and desired username and I'll send you a commit bit. | ||
moritz | thoughtpolice: for a start, we need an email address ;) | 21:44 | |
PerlJam | thoughtpolice: do you know haskell? | ||
offby1 | thoughtpolice: I'm exactly the wrong person to ask | ||
thoughtpolice: I just lurk here a lot, and occasionally write a tiny bit of perl6 | |||
thoughtpolice | PerlJam: I've been really into haskell for the past 2 months or so now | ||
PerlJam | thoughtpolice: excellent! Perhaps you can help audrey & co. with the pugs implementation :) | ||
thoughtpolice | and pugs seems to be something like a bridge between perl6 and haskell, so it's only natural I get interested | 21:45 | |
PerlJam | thoughtpolice: But if not, we still need more perl 6 tests, more docs, more ... well, everything | ||
thoughtpolice | i'm one of those types of people who have enough trouble writing docs for my own apps, unfortunately. :p | 21:46 | |
but pugs seems like a good project to get interested in because it has a good goal (so far I've been really impressed with perl6 in general,) and I like haskell a lot (in 2 months it ranked in as my favorite functional language by far for several good reasons) | |||
japhb | thoughtpolice: I would get yourself familiar more or less with the lay of the pugs code, and certainly the test library, but be aware that a big branch is being merged next week. (a big one got merged last night, too) | 21:47 | |
audreyt | thoughtpolice: your email address pleaser? :) | ||
*please | |||
thoughtpolice | audreyt: I gave it to Tene | ||
audreyt | oh ok. good | ||
thoughtpolice | audreyt: btw, i liked your presentation on pugs/perl6, I saw it on google video about 2 weeks ago. | ||
Tene is loading commitbit interface as we speak. :) | 21:48 | ||
thoughtpolice | it cropped up on programming.reddit.com which I read pretty regularly. | ||
:) | |||
audreyt | thoughtpolice: thanks :) in any case, search.cpan.org/dist/Perl6-Pugs/doc...c/Hack.pod can get you started | ||
lambdabot | Title: Pugs::Doc::Hack - How to hack on Pugs - search.cpan.org | ||
audreyt | the url there is now svn.pugscode.org/pugs instead of openfoundry | ||
lambdabot | Title: Revision 16445: / | ||
thoughtpolice | mucho appreciated. and yeah I have the svn repo here on my svn box. | ||
er | |||
s/svn/openbsd/ | 21:49 | ||
PerlJam | you have the openbsd repo on your svn box? | ||
thoughtpolice | of course that might need something like a :p5 annotation in this channel I guess? | ||
PerlJam | thoughtpolice: s:2nd/svn/openbsd/ # :-) | ||
thoughtpolice | :) | ||
i'm simply glad this o'reilly book didn't lie when it said "most of what you read will be out of date when you read it," luckily wall's apocalypses are fun reads anyway. | 21:50 | ||
audreyt | thoughtpolice: I assume you've glanced at the synopses at spec.pugscode.org? | ||
thoughtpolice | yeah those're the ones that're cross referenced right? | 21:51 | |
audreyt | aye | ||
thoughtpolice | i haven't quite looked through all of them, primarily I've been looking through the ones that've pertained to the little p6 app I've been tooling with recently to get the feel of the current spec. | 21:52 | |
but i like the results. | |||
audreyt | thoughtpolice: so just play with the pugs you built, and then check in your little p6 app under either ext/ or examples/, write some tests for it | ||
and add your name to AUTHORS | |||
actually, first add your name to AUTHORS | |||
and then we'll take you rom there :) | |||
*from | 21:53 | ||
PerlJam | thoughtpolice: what's your little p6 app? | ||
Tene | /admin/project/Pugs/people is still not loading for me. | ||
audreyt | japhb: finally located the bug into the fact that eval"" doesn't propagate context info anymore. testing and will commit in a bit | ||
japhb | audreyt: fantastic | ||
thoughtpolice | PerlJam: it's a little prompt implementation, the code is kind of ugly to a degree but it's just a test, mainly. gimme a sec, I was going to upload it to my site where I have my darcs repo's just now anyway | 21:54 | |
japhb | Oh, svn v. darcs v. whatever reminds me: | ||
avar | audreyt: if it's not too much trouble, could you give me comaint on re::engine::PCRE? | 21:55 | |
I'm fixing up the re::engines after I broke everything in blead and I might as well do ::PCRE too:) | |||
thoughtpolice | PerlJam: anapnea.net/~thoughtpolice/promptr/ | ||
lambdabot | Title: Index of /~thoughtpolice/promptr/ | ||
avar | did my pcre comments get through? Cat disabled the internet connection:) | ||
audreyt | Tene: better now? | 21:56 | |
svnbot6 | r16446 | moritz++ | ext/Set: fixed two typos/brainos that caused compiler errors | ||
r16446 | moritz++ | audreyt++ # pugs detecting more errors | |||
audreyt | avar: doing so | ||
Tene | Internal Server Error now. :) | ||
avar | audreyt: whee:) | ||
japhb | I need to make a source repo (3D Perl, natch) available to myself and someone else. We're both behind firewalls at different companies, so neither of us can put up an SVN server that the other can see. Is there a source control system that works naturally via just email? | ||
moritz | japhb: is it open source? | 21:57 | |
japhb | moritz: yes | ||
offby1 | use google code hosting? | ||
audreyt | Tene: I really don't know what's happening to commitbit/jifty on feather :/ | ||
japhb | But for now it's just a couple blokes, so whatever it is must be *easy*, like commitbit easy | 21:58 | |
thoughtpolice | japhb: you can just send your patches via darcs send, if that'll work. | ||
japhb | offby1: hmmmm, interesting. sf.net clone? | ||
moritz | offby1: I wanted to suggest the same ;) | ||
thoughtpolice | if you have some sort of client like mutt you can have it auto-apply them if the sender has sent a valid signed email as well. | ||
japhb | thoughtpolice: ooh, interesting. | ||
Does darcs work across Win32/OS X/Linux/BSD? | 21:59 | ||
offby1 | japhb: kinda. Seems more reliable though. | ||
thoughtpolice | yeah, but it's kind of rough on win32. | ||
offby1 | japhb: and it has the advantage that a couple of the developers are frequently on #svn, and all-around nice guys | ||
japhb | offby1: that's key. I got burned before trying to use the svn hosting that Pugs used to be on. | ||
21:59
irc joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r16447 | audreyt++ | * Prelude: Work around the eval-not-propagating-context bug | 21:59 | |
r16447 | audreyt++ | by using no closures in the body of &eval. | |||
TimToady | load avg on feather currently 15 | ||
thoughtpolice | japhb: for some reason darcs send doesn't like me (I have msmtp configured and it works too,) but you can just create a patch with darcs send, output it to a file and just attach the patch to an email and send it later | 22:00 | |
japhb | offby1: you know, for some reason I am much more willing to use a service hosted by nice people. :-) | ||
offby1 | japhb: read their google groups archives to get an idea of the problems people have encountered | ||
japhb | offby1: cool, thank you | ||
offby1 | most have been fixed quickly, I think | ||
oh, and mention my name so that I'm eligible for the $150 kickback! :-) | |||
audreyt | avar: you're comaint now, have fun :) | 22:01 | |
japhb | thoughtpolice: and thank you, as well, I'll consider that | ||
avar | audreyt: woohoo:) | 22:02 | |
avar lurks and doesn't do anything with it for a few months:) | |||
thoughtpolice | japhb: currently there're some nasty darcs bugs however; most of them manifest themselves mainly in very large scale projects, however (see: the Glasgow Haskell Compiler) | ||
japhb | nasty darcs bugs?!? | 22:03 | |
thoughtpolice | luckily one of haskell.org's google SoC projects is to fix the most major of the bugs | ||
the main one is a conflict bug that just takes a long time to merge conflicts across branches of extremely large size, but that's most major one, but it's the one getting fixed in the SoC. | |||
japhb | OK, so it's perf bugs not "corrupting your repo" bugs? | 22:04 | |
avar | yay student^Wslave labour | ||
thoughtpolice | no. | ||
no real 'corruption' bugs | |||
audreyt | uh, it's O(n^2) perf bug | ||
thoughtpolice | yeah | ||
when I said takes a long time | |||
I meant it | |||
but like I said, only very large scale projects (dealing with thousands and thousands of patches like GHC) seem to be affected most directly; reports have been ranging from hours to days to merge conflicts based on repo size. | 22:05 | ||
TimToady | anyone else had trouble with strawberry perl coredumping on Perl_regclass_swash()? I hit that when trying to run testgraph.pl, and haven't changed anything recently... | 22:06 | |
PerlJam | O(2^n) would take a long time. O(n^2) is just a little while :) | ||
thoughtpolice | i've been aware of it for a while now | 22:07 | |
but it's posed no problems in my experiances | |||
TimToady | not for n == 3 | ||
audreyt | PerlJam: well yeah :) that's why people still use darcs... | ||
thoughtpolice | then again I'm not writing a 100 kLOC application like GHC, | ||
audreyt | I've been bit by that repeatedly when working with ghc | ||
thoughtpolice | so you may wish to take my words with a grain of salt or two | ||
audreyt: doesn't suprise me, marlow & co have talked about it with roundy on the darcs mailing lists. | 22:08 | ||
audreyt | if not for the bug it might be that I'll spend moretime hacking GHC than pugs ;) | ||
thoughtpolice | and roundy is addressing it by being the supervisor for the SoC project that's fixing the bug. | ||
audreyt | thoughtpolice: *nod*, we all voted on Jason's proposal -- I think it's the only unanimous one | ||
PerlJam | What is it that's missing for Perl 6 to have another water-shed event (like pugs) and become "real" in the popular sense? | 22:09 | |
thoughtpolice | audreyt: yeah. roundy said it's not really that complicated of a fix, but it'll take some time and more technical considerations (efficiency, disk space, etc..) | ||
dduncan | some killer app written in perl 6 that is used in production | ||
moritz | PerlJam: a feature complete release? compiling to parrot? | ||
audreyt | PerlJam: the Camel book, then Llama book, and an implementation that runs them? | ||
PerlJam | dduncan: do you really think a killer app is necessary? | 22:11 | |
audreyt | Tene: have you gone through with commitbitting to thoughtpolice? | ||
PerlJam | dduncan: You don't think "build it and they will come" works here? | 22:12 | |
moritz | PerlJam: it will work for the perl folks, but perhaps not for other folks | ||
PerlJam | audreyt: well, what I mean is ... why don't we have that implementation already? Where are the roadblocks? | ||
Tene | audreyt: it only barely loaded. | ||
TimToady | loadavg is 11 | 22:13 | |
audreyt | TimToady: is this legal? sub f ($x = sub { $x }) {} | ||
PerlJam | And what would be a "killer app" for perl 6? | ||
TimToady | I think Perl 6 will be its own killer app once it can compile itself. | ||
Tene | sending now | ||
dduncan | let me clarify that a killer app is one way, not the only way | ||
thoughtpolice | PerlJam: wall is still working on the specs (along with the p6 lang mailing list,) so that's kind of a block right there since wall is BDFL of perl. | ||
dduncan | and yes, as TimToady says | 22:14 | |
audreyt | thoughtpolice: around here usually "TimToady" instead of "wall", fyi :) | ||
TimToady | speaking of the thought police... :) | ||
dduncan | generally speaking, when we have something that people will do anything to get, that either is or requires Perl 6 | ||
thoughtpolice | audreyt: thanks. | ||
:p | 22:15 | ||
PerlJam | dduncan: perhaps I'm a pessimist today, but I don't see any such thing on the horizon. | ||
(other than perl 6 itself) | |||
moritz | PerlJam: another good way would be really good integration for rules - that's kinda killer as well ;) | ||
dduncan | but I also agree with the idea of having a Perl 6 camel book et al should be a big driver ... basically when the average perl developer feels that Perl 6 can be used now | ||
TimToady | audreyt: it doesn't seem terribly useful to return a closure of the unbound parameter | 22:16 | |
audreyt | TimToady: oh, but that construct is used here... | ||
my $x = sub { $x }; | |||
which seems pretty useful | |||
dduncan | on a tangent, do any other languages have killer apps? | ||
thoughtpolice | library support is a huge issue in reality, luckily CPAN is pretty much the best there is, so we know there'll be lots of libraries already waiting for perl6. | ||
PerlJam | dduncan: ruby has rails. :) | ||
thoughtpolice | dduncan: rails contributed a lot to ruby | ||
dduncan | right | 22:17 | |
japhb | What is wrong with this in current pugs? | ||
%.lookup<command_action> = { | |||
quit => &action_quit, | |||
screenshot => &action_screenshot, | |||
... | |||
I get: | |||
audreyt | TimToady: so after the vardecl/signature unification, perhaps it's easier to apply the once-declared-it's-visible-to-the-right rule | ||
japhb | $ ~/svk/pugs/pugs step075-nogfx.p6 *** | ||
Unexpected "," | |||
expecting "::" or signature value | |||
Variable "&action_quit" requires predeclaration or explicit package name | |||
at step075-nogfx.p6 line 110, column 40 | |||
dduncan | so is it not feasible that Perl 6 could have something that brings attention to it in similar ways, aside from just the language itself being good? | ||
thoughtpolice | i can't see the future, but django will probably work pretty well for python. also, seaside is working to smalltalk's advantage (i realize I'm going on about web frameworks here, but whatever :p) | ||
japhb | And I didn't get that yesterday | ||
audreyt | japhb: well, is &action_quit is in scope? | ||
pugs just got the ability to check for stricture in compile time :) | 22:18 | ||
japhb | audreyt: yep, just farther down in the file. Do I need to stub at top of file now? | ||
TimToady | audreyt: in any case, the $x in the sub would certainly refer to the declared $x | ||
audreyt | japhb: spec is not terribly clear on that | ||
TimToady | assuming we don't come up with a good reason for breaking that consistency | ||
audreyt | from the current reading, only | 22:19 | |
action_quit(); ...; sub action_quit {...} | |||
can compile correctly # provisional call | |||
but | |||
&action_quit ... ; sub action_quit {...} | |||
thoughtpolice | dduncan: library support, like I said, is extremely critical, but that's already covered. cpan is a good enough reason to consider perl for some of your tasks if you ask me. | ||
audreyt | should fail the same as as "$x ...; my $x" fails | ||
thoughtpolice | it may not be *the* reason you choose perl, but it would have a good factor in that decision I would assume. | ||
japhb | audreyt: AH, interesting! | ||
audreyt | but I'm not sure if spec has changed in the past two months | ||
PerlJam | I agree that some form of documentation (Camel,Llama,etc.) are needed, but I think Perl 6 doesn't need a "killer app" as much as it needs to be put into production (even if it's just pugs) in a visible and "eating our own dog food" way. | ||
audreyt | so a sanity check from TimToady would be appreciated :) | 22:20 | |
TimToady | hasn't change in that respect | ||
dduncan | this could just be hubris, but I like to think that my database project will shake up the database world in general, and if so, provide a killer app for Perl since it is written in that | ||
TimToady | *changed | ||
audreyt | japhb: k, so predeclare. | ||
dduncan | still, Perl 6 should likely become its own killer app before that happens | ||
Tene | thoughtpolice: it *might* have sent youa commit bit. | ||
thoughtpolice | Tene: yeah I got it | ||
Tene | yay | ||
audreyt | Tene++ | ||
thoughtpolice | :) | 22:21 | |
22:21
DrSlump joined
|
|||
DrSlump | hi | 22:21 | |
japhb | audreyt: OK, thanks. | ||
Does predeclare have to match signature, or can I just say 'method action_quit {...}' at the top? | |||
audreyt | japhb: we're used to the p5 way where all \& resolution is runtime and package scoped | ||
and all other sigils are compile time and lexical | |||
but in p6 everything is lexical if it looks lexical | 22:22 | ||
japhb | audreyt: yes, and that's a source of guaranteed perf loss, isn't it? | ||
(I mean in P5 case) | |||
audreyt | oh yes. | ||
japhb: another way is saying &ThisPackage::action_quit | |||
explicitly | |||
japhb | audreyt: but wouldn't that make my class hard to inherit from? | ||
Tene | DrSlump: Hi! | 22:23 | |
audreyt | japhb: uh, I think you really want | ||
PerlJam | japhb: nah, you just override &ThisPackage::action_quit from your subclasses when you need to ;-) | ||
audreyt | { self.action_quit } | ||
or some such, instead of &action_quit | |||
if you care about inheritance | |||
{ $.action_quit } | |||
means the same thing | |||
thoughtpolice | oi, Tene, now I'm sort of seeing why it might have taken so long. | ||
Tene | thoughtpolice: heh. Yeah, there are load problems on that box these days. | 22:24 | |
TimToady | currently 13 | ||
thoughtpolice | it's fine | ||
diakopter | TimToady: earlier you mentioned rw subs as sigil-free vars... how would one effect a pragma to allow one to declare such subs as in: Dim BareWord or var BareWord | ||
japhb | audreyt: well, methods from that table later get called using '$action.(self: $command, |@args);' | ||
audreyt sees the "Dim" word and shudders | |||
japhb | s/methods from/methods looked up from/ | ||
thoughtpolice | also, I should mention my svn up isn't working, and svn.pugscode.org/pugs is giving me a 403 | ||
i'm pretty sure that's not natural. | 22:25 | ||
audreyt | japhb: ah. in that case... just use strings. | ||
TimToady | presumably one would have to hook into the recognizer for unrecognized words in such declarations. | ||
audreyt | ?eval my $x = 'sqrt'; 123.$x | ||
22:25
evalbot_r16421 is now known as evalbot_r16443
|
|||
evalbot_r16443 | 11.090536506409418 | 22:25 | |
TimToady | and assume type prefixes will always be predeclared | ||
audreyt | and then invoke as | ||
TimToady | my Foo Bar baz; | ||
audreyt | self.$action($command, |@args) | ||
TimToady | is illegal unless Foo and Bar are predeclared | 22:26 | |
audreyt | where $action is a simple Str | ||
TimToady | alternately do an inside-out shellish trick where declaring $baz also creates the bare func | ||
japhb | audreyt: but wouldn't that be slower than having $action be a Routine? | 22:27 | |
TimToady | arguably already happens if you declare "my Foo Bar &baz;" | ||
except that it deoesn't | |||
audreyt | japhb: but if $action is a Routine it's not upto inheritance anyway. | ||
i.e. even if there's a subclass, you still run parent class's &action_quit | |||
japhb | (Note: I'm trying to learn the most performant way to do this ...) | ||
audreyt | even if subclass overrides ^action_quit | 22:28 | |
er &action_quit | |||
TimToady | sounds like you want to curry on the invocant, perhaps | ||
japhb | audreyt: ah! right. Duh. | ||
audreyt | for (I hope obvious) reasons... | ||
japhb | audreyt: yep, just needed the clue by four | ||
audreyt | :D | ||
japhb | OK, so there are really two requirements here: | ||
1. My command lookup needs to be secure in the sense that noone can send me a requested action that is not in my list of safe actions. | 22:29 | ||
2. It needs to be as fast as possible, as I'll be processing a LOT of them | 22:30 | ||
audreyt | but you want inheritance. | ||
japhb | Oh right, ("comfy chair!"): | ||
audreyt | so really, a by-name lookup checked against a junction (or a set, or a map, or a regex) seems like the only way out | 22:31 | |
facier if you obtain that check using a method so your subclass can override the check | |||
*fancier | |||
TimToady | or self.$(%isok{$action}//fail) | ||
amnesiac waves | 22:32 | ||
audreyt | right. | ||
TimToady | but if you know the allowed actions already, they're presumably defined methods | ||
PerlJam | introspection to the rescue! | ||
japhb | 3. And my method has to allow an inheriting class to override an action | 22:33 | |
audreyt: It would certainly be nice for an inheriting class to be able to extend the action list. But for now at least that's just a bonus. Override is a necessity. | |||
TimToady | what's the matter with self.$action(...) | ||
svnbot6 | r16448 | audreyt++ | * Allow params to refer to themselves in their initializing | ||
r16448 | audreyt++ | expressions, for example: | |||
r16448 | audreyt++ | sub f ($x = sub { $x }) { ... } | |||
r16448 | audreyt++ | my $x = sub { $x } | |||
audreyt | TimToady: I advised a ($action ~~ any(< ok1 ok2 ok3 ok4 >)) and then a $.$action() | 22:34 | |
TimToady | but then you can't add actions in a subclass | ||
audreyt | eq instead of ~~, anyway | ||
and yes, the list would be obtained from a method, presumably | |||
PerlJam | Seems a simple naming convention would do. | ||
TimToady | self."ACTION_$action" is supposed to work | 22:35 | |
japhb | PerlJam++ # The Lazy solution | ||
PerlJam | japhb: hey, perl taught me all about laziness, so TimToady++ :-) | 22:36 | |
japhb | OK, either audreyt's latest or PerlJam/TimToady's latest will be my fallback position. | ||
Now on to the premature optimization phase: | |||
TimToady | in this case, when I say "is supposed to work", I mean "is specced", not "is implemented yet" | 22:38 | |
audreyt | I hear that premature evil is the root of all optimizations... | ||
japhb | If I know that no new class will get in the way of things at *runtime*, can I improve on this? Or does the "compilation units are separate" rule get in the way of doing the optimization that I know at program compile time the entire class heirarchy surrounding this module? | ||
s/optimization that/optimizations based on knowing that/ | 22:39 | ||
TimToady | that's what all the verbiage about "the application as a whole gets to decide which classes can be finalized" is abpout | ||
PerlJam | japhb: well, now you're back to self.$action (given that you know new classes will "get in the way") | ||
audreyt | sorry, mind too fried to parse english. back to hacking a bit and then sleep... | ||
PerlJam | guten Nacht audreyt :-) | ||
japhb | audreyt: sleep well | 22:40 | |
audreyt | 'nite :) & | ||
thoughtpolice | later | ||
dduncan | yes, that | ||
amnesiac | audreyt, so you're saving energy to parse Perl6 only? | ||
clever. | |||
TimToady | see S12:1650 | ||
japhb | Thank $deity for moritz++'s logbot | 22:41 | |
22:41
perlDreamer joined
|
|||
thoughtpolice | hm, pugs is available as a ghc lib? | 22:42 | |
learn something new every day | |||
japhb | TimToady: Ah, nice. | ||
So what syntax could I use in my class to allow the top-level program to optimize things if it wants to? The lookup table using { $.action_foo } blocks? | 22:43 | ||
dduncan | so I guess 16448 is audrey's last commit before sleep, then? | 22:44 | |
in which case, I'll start a smoke | |||
TimToady | the point is that the top-level program is always allowed to decide | ||
she said she was maybe going to do some sleephacking first | 22:45 | ||
dduncan | so not the last then? | ||
fyi, it takes 2 hours for me to do a smoke, so I prefer to do so at optimal times | |||
japhb | TimToady: I understand that ... I meant, "How do I build my dispatcher such that I don't make it useless for the top-level program to decide to optimize?" | ||
audreyt | dduncan: I can make it the last, so let's call it the last :) | 22:46 | |
dduncan | okay | ||
japhb | TimToady: or better "What construct do I use that is even amenable to optimization?" | ||
TimToady | that would depend on the optimizer, and whether it knows how to do something with self.$action | 22:47 | |
japhb | TimToady: hmmmm | ||
TimToady | but all you have to do from the global standpoint is refrain from marking classes as open or non-final unnecessarily | 22:48 | |
using a construct like self.$action will not mark any classes | |||
japhb decides to let Lazy take over from Impatient for now, and leave this to when an implementation actually has on optimizer | |||
nodnod | |||
TimToady | deriving from a class markes it as non-final automatically | ||
japhb | right | 22:49 | |
TimToady | s:2nd/e// | ||
if you want to add classes at run-time, then you might be forced to mark a base class as non-final explicitly | |||
japhb | makes sense | ||
TimToady | I believe "basal" is the word currently used for that | ||
but you'd only have to mark leaf nodes that way | 22:50 | ||
japhb | gotcha | ||
TimToady | dduncan: why does it matter how much CPU time you burn provisionally? If you see a new patch, just restart the build... | 22:53 | |
dduncan | it's not a big deal | 22:56 | |
perlDreamer | Is anyone else seeing build errors in a Prelude file? | ||
lambdabot | perlDreamer: You have 1 new message. '/msg lambdabot @messages' to read it. | ||
perlDreamer | @message | ||
lambdabot | Maybe you meant: messages messages? | ||
perlDreamer | @messages | ||
lambdabot | agentzh said 9h 22m 19s ago: well, that entry was created in the last summer when i created the t/closure_traits directory and several .t files in it. I'm glad to see many new tests have been added | ||
there. feel free to remove the task if you think it's already done :) i'm lacking the tuits right now. | |||
moritz | perlDreamer: I just compiled successfully | ||
perlDreamer | What's the channel pasting policy? | 22:57 | |
avar | to not have a policy about it | ||
:) | |||
but you can use the topic thingy for anything big-ish | |||
moritz | sial.org/pbot/perl6 | ||
lambdabot | Title: sial.org Pastebot - pasteling | ||
dduncan | now starting smoke | 22:58 | |
pasteling | "perlDreamer" at 204.17.142.54 pasted "pugs error during build of Prelude file" (13 lines, 689B) at sial.org/pbot/24975 | ||
perlDreamer | thanks moritz | ||
TimToady | ignore that, unless you're trying to use the JS backend | 22:59 | |
it's undergone considerable bitrot in the last year | 23:00 | ||
perlDreamer | cool, thanks, TimToady | 23:01 | |
Yaakov | Hello, Larry. | ||
Hope you are wel. | |||
l | |||
TimToady | I'm doing pretty good. | ||
how are you? | |||
mr_ank | perl =~ /(ways todo it)+/ | 23:12 | |
perlDreamer | When do the test-linked specs on perlcabal.org get updated? | 23:19 | |
moritz | perlDreamer: I don't know when, just how often... | 23:21 | |
perlDreamer: it's once an hour, but the test results only once a day | |||
perlDreamer | thanks, moritz | 23:23 | |
moritz | perlDreamer: thanks | 23:24 | |
japhb | What is the current way to get from a string containing a method name to the Method itself? self.can('foo') doesn't seem to exist | ||
avar | .HOW? | 23:30 | |
svnbot6 | r16449 | thoughtpolice++ | added name to AUTHORS | ||
avar | thoughtpolice: yay:) | 23:31 | |
moritz | thoughtpolice++ | ||
are named arguments generally broken atm in pugs? | |||
thoughtpolice | :) | ||
i'm so happy. | 23:32 | ||
unfortunately though for the time being I have to jet | |||
luckily school's over next week so I have about 3 months to contribute all I can. | |||
later | |||
23:38
REPLeffe1t joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r16450 | moritz++ | Perl6::Value::List: fixed variable name that caused compiling error | 23:38 | |
23:42
justatheory joined
|
|||
svnbot6 | r16451 | moritz++ | removed :todo from succeeding tests in var/my.t | 23:42 | |
23:44
Southen_ joined
|
|||
Jmax | \/win 41 | 23:55 | |
whoops! |