perl6-projects.org/ | nopaste: sial.org/pbot/perl6 | evalbot: 'perl6: say 3;' | irclog: irc.pugscode.org/ Set by mncharity on 25 March 2009. |
|||
00:07
amoc left
00:08
bacek_ joined,
amoc joined
00:13
Limbic_Region left
00:18
brunov joined
00:19
jferrero left
00:23
Kisu joined
00:42
ruoso joined
00:44
Limbic_Region joined
00:55
davidad joined
01:00
ZuLuuuuuu left
01:03
Limbic_Region left
01:06
nihiliad joined
01:08
wknight8111 left
|
|||
pugs_svn | r26239 | cspencer++ | Skip tests calling positional parameters by name. | 01:13 | |
01:14
nihiliad left
01:17
nihiliad joined
01:30
kimtaro left
01:42
kidd` left
01:43
kidd` joined
01:48
justatheory left
01:54
FurnaceBoy left
01:55
kimtaro joined,
araujo joined,
kimtaro_ joined
02:05
justatheory joined
02:09
nihiliad left
02:12
kimtaro left
02:27
eternaleye joined
02:32
sitaram joined
02:38
kimtaro joined
02:45
kimtaro left,
kidd` left,
amoc left,
japhb left
02:47
baest joined
02:54
kimtaro joined,
kidd` joined,
amoc joined,
japhb joined,
Woody2143 joined,
Helios` joined,
ingy joined,
pmichaud joined,
lucs joined,
allbery_b joined,
frobnitz joined,
agentzh joined,
[particle] joined,
silug joined,
kcwu joined
02:56
sitaram left,
kimtaro_ left
02:57
orafu joined
03:02
OuLouFu left
03:06
meppuru joined
03:14
justatheory left
03:17
orafu left
03:21
meppl left
03:32
msmatsko joined
03:35
frew|work joined
03:41
sri_kraih left
03:44
amoc left
03:46
baest left
03:47
baest joined,
diakopter joined,
broquaint joined,
zostay joined
03:48
xinming left
03:49
xinming joined
03:52
orafu joined,
amoc joined
04:00
msmatsko left,
msmatsko joined
04:03
cspencer left
04:21
edenc left,
edenc joined
04:23
kimtaro_ joined
04:40
kimtaro left
04:47
szabgab joined
05:10
cspencer joined
05:15
justatheory joined
05:19
skids left
05:30
DemoFreak joined
|
|||
pugs_svn | r26240 | cspencer++ | Skip tests that call positional params by name. | 05:38 | |
dalek | kudo: ab7e189 | pmichaud++ | docs/spectest-progress.csv: spectest-progress.csv update: 362 files, 10357 passing, 0 failing |
05:42 | |
05:55
frew|work left
06:27
edenc left,
davidad left,
Khisanth left,
ruoso left,
brunov left,
[particle] left,
lucs left,
kcwu left,
silug left,
frobnitz left,
pmichaud left,
agentzh left,
Helios` left,
allbery_b left,
ingy left,
cspencer left,
orafu left,
bacek_ left,
eternaleye left,
REPLeffect_ left,
c9s left,
baest left,
broquaint left,
zostay left,
diakopter left,
kimtaro_ left,
msmatsko left,
amoc left,
japhb left,
kidd` left,
Woody2143 left,
awwaiid left,
LylePerl left,
szabgab left,
xinming left,
atomicstack left,
dalek left,
plu left,
BinGOs left,
DemoFreak left,
justatheory left,
araujo left,
kst left,
Patterner left,
wayland76 left,
payload left,
Kisu left,
cj left,
sunnavy left,
p6eval left,
nnunley left,
omega left,
frodwith left,
meppuru left,
[particle]1 left,
hexmode left,
clkao left,
hcchien left,
cookys left
06:28
jnthn joined,
DemoFreak joined,
justatheory joined,
cspencer joined,
szabgab joined,
kimtaro_ joined,
edenc joined,
msmatsko joined,
amoc joined,
orafu joined,
xinming joined,
zostay joined,
broquaint joined,
diakopter joined,
baest joined,
meppuru joined,
kcwu joined,
silug joined,
[particle] joined,
agentzh joined,
frobnitz joined,
allbery_b joined,
lucs joined,
pmichaud joined,
ingy joined,
Helios` joined,
Woody2143 joined,
japhb joined,
kidd` joined,
eternaleye joined,
araujo joined,
davidad joined,
ruoso joined,
Kisu joined,
brunov joined,
bacek_ joined,
awwaiid joined,
dalek joined,
atomicstack joined,
payload joined,
omega joined,
Khisanth joined,
[particle]1 joined,
kst joined,
REPLeffect_ joined,
Patterner joined,
LylePerl joined,
wayland76 joined,
irc.freenode.net sets mode: +o jnthn,
c9s joined,
lambdabot joined,
bacek joined,
Tene joined,
aindilis joined,
mikehh joined,
smtms joined,
Gothmog_ joined,
PZt joined,
krunen joined,
jan___ joined,
PerlJam joined,
tarbo2 joined,
sbp joined,
lisppaste3 joined,
zev joined,
c1sung joined,
jiing joined,
Southen joined,
pasteling joined,
mtve joined,
dukeleto joined,
samlh joined,
betterworld joined,
s1n joined,
yahooooo joined,
literal joined,
gfldex joined,
jlaire joined,
sephee joined,
charsbar joined,
SamB joined,
revdiablo joined,
rafl_ joined,
Trey joined,
scrottie joined,
szbalint joined,
shachaf joined,
simcop2387 joined,
TimToady joined,
args joined,
gbacon joined,
cotto joined,
cls_bsd joined,
Maddingue joined,
buu joined,
IRSeekBot joined,
Grrrr joined,
AzureStone joined,
gravity joined,
pdc303 joined,
pugs_svn joined,
Diederich joined,
maluco joined,
jrockway joined,
cxreg joined,
mofino joined,
Aisling joined,
rhr joined,
buubot joined,
integral joined,
Matt-W joined,
mmpf joined,
jedai joined,
drbean joined,
ashizawa joined,
felipe joined,
Caelum joined,
ilbot2 joined,
eiro joined,
elmex joined,
NoirSoldats joined,
p6eval joined,
plu joined,
cj joined,
hexmode joined,
sunnavy joined,
BinGOs joined,
nnunley joined,
frodwith joined,
clkao joined,
cookys joined,
hcchien joined
06:30
cspencer left
06:31
szabgab left
07:01
mj41 joined
07:05
amoc left
07:06
amoc joined
07:15
iblechbot joined,
brunov left
07:17
sephee left
07:30
goksie joined
07:31
charsbar_ joined
07:35
charsbar left
07:36
payload left
07:38
goksie left
07:39
goksie joined,
bacek_ left
07:51
payload joined
|
|||
mikehh | rakudo (ab7e189) builds on Parrot r38168 - make test PASS / make spectest - t/spec/S09-typed-arrays/hashes.rakudo TODO passed: 6-7 | 07:51 | |
eiro | hello world | 07:53 | |
mikehh | Ubuntu Interpid i386 - in fact ./perl6 t/spec/S09-typed-arrays/hashes.t passes all tests (inc 1 skip in .rakudo) | ||
I have reported this before (twice) but do not know if it works on other platforms | 07:55 | ||
07:57
goksie_ joined
08:13
atomicstack left
08:14
amoc left
08:16
goksie left
08:36
cognominal joined
08:38
args is now known as rgs
08:46
kane_ joined
|
|||
eiro | pastebin.com/f66ecafdc | 08:47 | |
buubot | eiro: The paste f66ecafdc has been copied to erxz.com/pb/17079 | ||
eiro | hello all | 08:48 | |
this grammar acts only for the first line | |||
08:48
payload left,
payload joined
|
|||
eiro | any idea to parse all the file ? | 08:48 | |
Matt-W | I haven't figured out how that works yet | 08:52 | |
08:53
orafu left,
orafu joined
|
|||
Matt-W | I need it for one of my own projects that's on the back burner at the moment | 08:53 | |
eiro | the whole script is here: | 08:56 | |
pastebin.com/d1aac8684 | |||
buubot | eiro: The paste d1aac8684 has been copied to erxz.com/pb/17080 | ||
eiro | ok .. gotcha: it's a rule, not a token :) | 09:04 | |
wayland76 | How do I update git to head again? | 09:09 | |
(or whatever git calls head) | 09:10 | ||
09:11
goksie_ left
|
|||
Matt-W | git pull | 09:19 | |
wayland76 | Will that also tell me about the files it's updating as it does it? | 09:22 | |
Because I try that, and it says "already up-to-date" | 09:23 | ||
Matt-W | hmm then it thinks there's nothing more to get | ||
rakudo hasn't had anything committed today | 09:24 | ||
I'm sure NPW is keeping people's rakudo time down | 09:25 | ||
09:25
stas__ joined
|
|||
wayland76 | Well, yes, but the last time I did a successful pull was probably about a month ago | 09:26 | |
One would think that there have been updates in that time :) | 09:27 | ||
mikehh | I did a git pull earlier and docs/spectest-progress.csv had been updated | 09:29 | |
it tends to be updated daily so you should get something at least once a day | 09:31 | ||
wayland76 | So why aren't I? :) | 09:32 | |
09:33
payload left
|
|||
mikehh | you probably are pointing at a local master rather that the one on github | 09:33 | |
09:33
payload joined
|
|||
mikehh | git clone git://github.com/rakudo/rakudo.git | 09:35 | |
wayland76 | Not really the solution I was looking for, but I don't have other options, so I'll do it :) | 09:36 | |
Thanks | |||
mikehh | The docs on git are fairly dense - there is a fairly good book on git - Pragmatic Version Control Using git | 09:39 | |
wayland76 | I'll probably just learn a few magic incantations, and use those | 09:40 | |
rgs points at consttype.blogspot.com/2008/10/git-...-work.html | |||
wayland76 points at osteele.com/archives/2008/05/my-git-workflow and says "The diagram in this article is great" | 09:44 | ||
I've bookmarked your article rgs; it looks like it could be very useful in conjunction with the diagram in the other article | 09:45 | ||
rgs looks | 09:46 | ||
yes, i've simplified mine by not mentioning the index | |||
wayland76 | Tip: Don't update your OS on one machine, do a git clone on another, and then try to browse the web :) | 09:47 | |
It's reminiscent of dial-up :) | |||
09:48
Southen_ joined
|
|||
mikehh | The official git tutorial -> www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git...orial.html | 09:48 | |
09:54
cognominal left
10:03
Southen left,
mhsparks joined
10:22
masak joined
|
|||
masak | OH HAI from NPW 2009. | 10:22 | |
lambdabot | masak: You have 1 new message. '/msg lambdabot @messages' to read it. | ||
masak | @messages | ||
lambdabot | mncharity said 1d 5h 43m 45s ago: Thanks for the commit! Please let me know if you encounter other difficulties, or if I can be of any help. | ||
masak | mncharity: absolutely. | 10:23 | |
masak is listening to pmichaud's talk | |||
10:24
Southen joined
|
|||
wayland76 | hihihi | 10:25 | |
Did omega talk to you about his error running november-wiki? | 10:26 | ||
10:32
lumi joined
10:41
Southen_ left,
Southen_ joined,
Casan joined
10:49
Southen left
10:51
masak left
10:52
Southen joined
10:58
payload left
11:00
Casan left
11:06
kimtaro joined,
rodi joined
11:08
Southen_ left
11:10
sri_kraih joined
11:12
Southen_ joined
11:19
ruoso left
11:23
kimtaro_ left
11:25
rodi left
11:29
Southen left,
Southen joined
|
|||
pugs_svn | r26241 | lwall++ | Document the 'when' statement modifier. | 11:36 | |
wayland76 | yay! | 11:42 | |
Tene | sweet | 11:43 | |
I will implement soon. | |||
it needs tests, too | |||
11:44
Southen_ left
11:45
kimtaro left
11:46
ispy_ joined
|
|||
TimToady | I had thought it was already documented; STD has parsed it for a long time | 11:46 | |
wayland76 | We should've checked :) | 11:47 | |
TimToady | perl6: $_ = 42; say 'yes' when 42; | ||
p6eval | elf 26241: OUTPUTĀ«syntax error at (eval 124) line 4, near ";ā¤elsif"ā¤ at ./elf_h line 5881ā¤Ā» | ||
..rakudo ab7e18: OUTPUTĀ«yesā¤Ā» | |||
..pugs: OUTPUTĀ«*** ā¤ Unexpected "when"ā¤ expecting operator, ":" or ","ā¤ at /tmp/hoMx6Sn9FQ line 1, column 20ā¤Ā» | |||
pmichaud | Rakudo already parses it also. | ||
TimToady | would appear that you don't need to implement it. :) | ||
pmichaud | I followed STD.pm for that one :-) | 11:48 | |
wayland76 | rakudo: my %k = < this is a good >; for %k.keys { .say when /a/; }; | ||
pmichaud | rakudo: say 'yes' when 0; | ||
p6eval | rakudo ab7e18: OUTPUTĀ«aā¤Ā» | ||
rakudo ab7e18: OUTPUTĀ«Use of uninitialized valueā¤yesā¤Ā» | |||
wayland76 | rakudo: my %k = < this is a good >; for %k.keys { .say when !/a/; }; | ||
p6eval | rakudo ab7e18: ( no output ) | ||
11:48
kimtaro joined
|
|||
pmichaud | rakudo: say 'yes' when 0; | 11:48 | |
p6eval | rakudo ab7e18: OUTPUTĀ«Use of uninitialized valueā¤yesā¤Ā» | 11:49 | |
pmichaud | hmmm | ||
oh, yeah, it's a smart match. :-| | |||
TimToady | undef matches 0, I guess... | ||
pmichaud | I didn't set $_ | ||
rakudo: say 'yes' when False; | |||
p6eval | rakudo ab7e18: OUTPUTĀ«Method 'ACCEPTS' not found for invocant of class ''ā¤current instr.: 'infix:~~' pc 21632 (src/builtins/match.pir:18)ā¤Ā» | ||
pmichaud | hmmmm. | 11:50 | |
okay, we need some work there. | |||
pmichaud adds another topic to the hackathon list. | |||
wayland76 | What is rakudo thinking when I do... | ||
rakudo: my %k = < this is a good >; for %k.keys { .say when !/a/; }; | |||
p6eval | rakudo ab7e18: ( no output ) | ||
11:50
hanekomu joined
|
|||
pmichaud | Rakudo doesn't know how to deal with immediate regex matches yet. | 11:50 | |
I'm working on that | 11:51 | ||
wayland76 | Ok, so that should work eventually? | ||
TimToady | rakudo: my %k = < this is a good >; for %k.keys { .say when 'a' } | ||
p6eval | rakudo ab7e18: OUTPUTĀ«aā¤Ā» | ||
wayland76 | I'm thinking that when !/a/ should turn into $_ !~~ /a/ | ||
11:52
payload joined
11:54
ispy_ left
|
|||
Tene | TimToady: is there a negative version of when? when't? | 11:54 | |
TimToady | only for tests that are specifically against $_ already, such as // | 11:55 | |
wayland76 | rakudo: my %k = < this is a good >; for %k.keys { .say whent /a/; }; | 11:56 | |
p6eval | rakudo ab7e18: OUTPUTĀ«Statement not terminated properly at line 1, near "whent /a/;"ā¤ā¤current instr.: 'parrot;PGE;Util;die' pc 129 (runtime/parrot/library/PGE/Util.pir:83)ā¤Ā» | ||
wayland76 | std: my %k = < this is a good >; for %k.keys { .say whent /a/; }; | ||
p6eval | std 26241: OUTPUTĀ«Undeclared routine:ā¤ t used at 1 ā¤ok 00:02 36mā¤Ā» | ||
TimToady | not that "when not 'a' {...}" doesn't work either | 11:57 | |
wayland76 | std: my %k = < this is a good >; for %k.keys { .say when not /a/; }; | ||
pmichaud | there was a thread about this on p6l, I think. | ||
p6eval | std 26241: OUTPUTĀ«ok 00:03 38mā¤Ā» | ||
TimToady | *note | ||
wayland76 | rakudo: my %k = < this is a good >; for %k.keys { .say when not /a/; }; | ||
pmichaud | just a couple of months ago. | ||
p6eval | rakudo ab7e18: ( no output ) | ||
11:57
ispy_ joined
|
|||
Tene | why do you keep making a hash for that example instead of just using for on a list of two items? I've been curious for a while. | 11:59 | |
wayland76 | Someone else gave that as an example they were having trouble with | 12:00 | |
and I just kept using it | |||
slack I am! :) | |||
Tene | 'kay | 12:01 | |
12:09
LylePerl left
12:17
kimtaro left
12:19
hanekomu left
12:29
SamB left
12:30
SamB joined
12:31
Southen_ joined
12:33
payload left
12:38
ruoso joined
12:41
hanekomu joined
12:46
amoc joined,
amoc left,
payload joined
12:49
Southen left
12:54
payload left
13:02
hanekomu left
|
|||
pmichaud | pugs: say split(' ', 'hello world').perl; | 13:24 | |
p6eval | pugs: OUTPUTĀ«("hello", "world")ā¤Ā» | ||
pmichaud | pugs: say split('hello world', ' ').perl; | ||
p6eval | pugs: OUTPUTĀ«(" ",)ā¤Ā» | ||
13:31
hanekomu joined
13:34
cspencer joined,
kimtaro joined
|
|||
pugs_svn | r26242 | lwall++ | split function now takes delimiter as first arg | 13:34 | |
13:37
sitaram joined,
ejs joined
|
|||
sitaram | sb clear | 13:42 | |
(oops!) | 13:43 | ||
13:44
sitaram left
|
|||
Tene | argh, it's switching again? | 14:04 | |
wayland76 | I'd like to propose a new split implementation: sub split($a, $b) { if(rand() > 0.5) { realsplit($a, $b); } else { realsplit($b, $a); } | 14:07 | |
ruoso | wasn't it always like that? | 14:08 | |
I mean, the way it is now, not the rand part | |||
wayland76 | Does anyone remember the git command to overwrite a file I've messed up and revert to head? | 14:10 | |
rgs | git checkout ? | ||
cspencer | revert just a file or the entire repo to HEAD? | ||
PerlJam | wayland76: git status will tell you how in the comments | ||
wayland76 | thanks | ||
14:10
alester joined
|
|||
PerlJam | ruoso: not in the spec. That's how it was implemented because of perl-5-think though :) | 14:11 | |
Tene: it's not switching, another option has been added (unless I misread the patch earlier) | |||
ruoso | PerlJam, interesting... I was pretty sure that was covered in S09 as it is in S32/Str now | 14:12 | |
s/S09/S29/ | |||
wayland76 | rgs right, PerlJam wrong | ||
PerlJam | wayland76: you wanted to revert a single file to HEAD, or no? | 14:13 | |
wayland76: oh, you meant after you'd already committed. ... bad assumptions on my part. sorry | 14:14 | ||
wayland76 | PerlJam: Preferably one, but git checkout <filename> did what I wanted | ||
No, haven't committed | |||
Applied a patch that went horribly wrong, and wanted to revert and do it by hand | |||
PerlJam | wayland76: anyway ... TMTOWTDI applies to git as well :) | 14:15 | |
14:15
PhatEddy joined
|
|||
wayland76 | PerlJam: Maybe. But I tried your way, with no results | 14:16 | |
PerlJam | c'est la vie | 14:17 | |
14:18
hanekomu left
|
|||
PhatEddy | Is there a test file that covers open RTs with small code samples? | 14:20 | |
14:21
pmurias joined
|
|||
PhatEddy | Since nobody claims to know of such a file - is there interest in creating one? I started one covering a few RTs. | 14:24 | |
14:26
ZuLuuuuuu joined
|
|||
pmurias | PhatEddy: having one file per RT might make more sense | 14:29 | |
14:30
skids joined
|
|||
PhatEddy | so maybe an RT directory with one file per RT? | 14:31 | |
PerlJam | PhatEddy: I like the idea of collecting them all in one place rather than stumbling upon them in the code somewhere | ||
14:31
presh joined
|
|||
PerlJam | PhatEddy: A dir with one file per rt sounds fine to me. | 14:32 | |
PhatEddy | If the RT notes an existing test or comes with a test patch that's been applied there's no need to duplicate ... | 14:34 | |
otherwise I think that my project may be of some use ... | |||
14:34
brunov joined
14:38
nihiliad joined
14:40
bigpresh is now known as bigpresh_,
presh is now known as bigpresh
|
|||
skids ponders of the Int type of push&unshift in S32/Containers is a relic/oversight or conscious design decision. | 14:43 | ||
e.g. the implication of a List-returning variant for feeds, like splice. | |||
14:43
__felix__ joined
|
|||
skids | Someone who's been around p6l long enough to know these things should really take an hour and go through and make sure those protos are all correct. | 14:43 | |
14:43
__felix__ left
|
|||
skids | hrm. "whip, v.tr. 1) To strike with repeated strokes ... 8) To wrap or bind (a rope, for example) with twine to prevent unraveling or fraying." | 14:53 | |
pmichaud | std: $_ .= abs; | 14:54 | |
skids suggests whip as huffmanization/mnemonic-ization of "roundrobin" | |||
p6eval | std 26242: OUTPUTĀ«ok 00:02 35mā¤Ā» | ||
pmichaud | std: .= abs; | ||
p6eval | std 26242: OUTPUTĀ«##### PARSE FAILED #####ā¤Can't understand next input--giving up at /tmp/AZ9LYwzfOV line 1:ā¤------> .= abs;ā¤ expecting dotty method or postfixā¤FAILED 00:02 34mā¤Ā» | ||
pmichaud | (split change in S32) -- today we noticed that the spec was backwards from the way p5 does it, even though both pugs and rakudo had implemented the p5 argument ordering | 14:56 | |
skids | Yeah I noticed that moritz commit. | ||
pmichaud | but when 'split' was migrated from PIR to Perl 6 setting in rakudo, the implementor followed the (incorrect) spec. So, r26242 corrects the spec (and we need to go fix Rakudo). | ||
Apparently when Rakudo followed the incorrect spec, it broke November. | 14:57 | ||
I think the various spectests (which were also changed to follow the incorrect spec) have to be reverted as well | 14:58 | ||
afk for a while. | |||
skids | Which would make split more a method of the pattern than the target data, right? | 15:00 | |
Or how does List.split fit in now? | |||
15:02
FurnaceBoy joined
15:03
nihiliad left
15:04
orevdiabl joined,
jbt joined
|
|||
skids | pugs: split("h","ahbhc").say | 15:07 | |
p6eval | pugs: OUTPUTĀ«abcā¤Ā» | ||
15:11
kane_ left
15:15
cspencer left,
PhatEddy left
15:16
revdiablo left
15:17
exodist joined
|
|||
wayland76 | Who works on the Rakudo install/build setup? | 15:21 | |
15:35
frew|work joined
15:39
amoc joined,
FurnaceBoy left
|
|||
skids | wayland76: I seem to recall particle mucks around with makefiles a lot. | 15:41 | |
wayland76 | ok | ||
I'll try to remember to talk to him about my patch once I have it working with the latest rakudo | 15:42 | ||
skids | best way to know for sure might be to pull a commit log on makefiles | 15:45 | |
skids points out that the majority of split changes that need to be undone are currently the latest commit to the test file. | |||
15:46
Psyche^ joined
15:47
Patterner left,
Psyche^ is now known as Patterner
15:49
ejs0 joined
15:50
ejs left
|
|||
skids | also, attention to S32-str/comb.t S32-str/quotemeta.t integration/real-strings.t pugs/Demo.pm | 15:50 | |
lambdabot: @tell moritz: backlog, re: split | 15:52 | ||
lambdabot | Consider it noted. | ||
15:55
orafu left,
orafu joined
16:01
barney joined
16:02
[particle]1 is now known as [particle]-
16:03
frew|work left
16:07
antiphase joined
16:10
kimtaro left
16:11
kimtaro joined,
nihiliad joined
16:28
LylePerl joined
|
|||
kidd` | Hi. Is there something like $/=undef to slurp $*IN ? | 16:28 | |
16:29
amoc left
|
|||
LylePerl | I've seen some stuff about slurping in the source of perlcabal.org/syn/S29.html | 16:29 | |
kidd` | thanks. I'll search there. | 16:31 | |
PerlJam | just use slurp() on it. | ||
(or does $*IN not quite work yet?) | |||
kidd` | I tried slurp $*IN and didn't work, but I didn't know if it was supposed to | 16:32 | |
PerlJam | okay | ||
16:47
eternaleye left
16:51
mofino left
16:55
ZuLuuuuuu left
16:56
arnsholt joined
17:02
mhsparks left
17:15
alanhaggai joined,
alanhaggai left
17:16
alanhaggai joined
17:23
stas__ left
17:41
cognominal joined
17:57
argggh joined
18:15
araujo left
|
|||
moritz_ | re | 18:16 | |
lambdabot | moritz_: You have 1 new message. '/msg lambdabot @messages' to read it. | ||
moritz_ | "backlog" isn't very specific | 18:22 | |
ah, TimToady++ changed it back again ;-) | 18:24 | ||
so I'll have to revert some of my changes | |||
well, that happens in Perl 6 land ;-9 | |||
actually I'm glad it's back to what it used to be | |||
[particle]- has no idea what moritz_ is talking about... | |||
moritz_ | split, and its order of parameters | 18:25 | |
18:26
Casan joined
18:27
ZuLuuuuuu joined
|
|||
dalek | kudo: 8f5ecdc | (Moritz Lenz)++ | tools/progress-graph.pl: better error message in progress-graph.pl |
18:27 | |
kudo: 73ead21 | (Moritz Lenz)++ | docs/ChangeLog: [docs] udpated ChangeLog |
|||
kudo: 65b3e65 | (Moritz Lenz)++ | t/spectest.data: eight more passing test files |
|||
Casan | The other day someone asked how we define that a method in an inherited class can't be overloaded in the subclass. I looked at the synopsis, but didn't find it. any ideas? | 18:31 | |
lambdabot | Casan: You have 1 new message. '/msg lambdabot @messages' to read it. | ||
moritz_ | Casan: it's not possible, by design | 18:33 | |
Casan | moritz_: ok lets take it here, whats the reason by design? multiple inheritance related? | 18:34 | |
moritz_ | Casan: the most compelling reason is probably that you can emulate it anyway | 18:36 | |
Casan: and it's less work to simply allow it in the first place | |||
18:37
alanhaggai left
|
|||
Casan | ok | 18:37 | |
moritz_ | the alternative is to make an effort to implement some restriction, and then somebody else has to put effort in it to work around it | ||
pugs_svn | r26243 | moritz++ | [t] move macro tests to spec/ and unspecced/ | ||
r26244 | moritz++ | [t/magicals] move inc.t to spec/; delete the other tests | |||
r26244 | moritz++ | | |||
r26244 | moritz++ | ($?POSTION is not specced, and the other tests only tested that) | |||
Casan | thanks for the answer, I was just curious now it was brought up. | ||
pugs_svn | r26245 | moritz++ | [t] move symbolic_deref.t to spec/ | ||
r26246 | moritz++ | [t] remove dangerous duplicate test | |||
r26247 | moritz++ | [t] move lvalue_deep_brackets.t to spec/ | |||
r26248 | moritz++ | [t/spec] cleaned up autovivification.t a bit, and added a few more tests | |||
r26249 | moritz++ | [t/spec] stringify Match object before is() comparison | 18:38 | ||
r26250 | moritz++ | [t/spec] some unfudges for Rakudo | |||
r26251 | moritz++ | [t] move fmt.t to spec | |||
wayland76 | Hi all. Is there a way on github (or git) that I can see all the commits that have affected a particular file? | 18:42 | |
arnsholt | There's something called git log, but I can't quite make out if it does what you want on the spur of the moment | 18:44 | |
literal | git log -- Makefile.PL | ||
for example | |||
18:57
sri_kraih_ joined
|
|||
wayland76 | thanks. That answers my question :) | 19:05 | |
...and -u if you want to see diffs :) | 19:06 | ||
19:07
mofino joined
19:12
sri_kraih left
19:18
rblasch joined
19:19
Casan left
19:27
stas__ joined
19:30
argggh left,
argggh joined
|
|||
Tene | rakudo: say 'fool ~~ s/o/a/ | 19:35 | |
p6eval | rakudo ecca70: OUTPUTĀ«say requires an argument at line 1, near " 'fool ~~ "ā¤ā¤current instr.: 'parrot;PGE;Util;die' pc 129 (runtime/parrot/library/PGE/Util.pir:83)ā¤Ā» | ||
Tene | rakudo: say 'foo' ~~ s/o/a/ | ||
p6eval | rakudo ecca70: OUTPUTĀ«Statement not terminated properly at line 1, near "/"ā¤ā¤current instr.: 'parrot;PGE;Util;die' pc 129 (runtime/parrot/library/PGE/Util.pir:83)ā¤Ā» | ||
Tene | I thought that worked... | ||
moritz_ | Tene: no, rakudo never did s/.../.../ | 19:37 | |
Tene: $str.subst($regex, $closure) works, though | |||
or $str.subst(/..../, $str, :g) for global replacement | |||
Tene | can you access the match from the closure? | ||
moritz_ | yes, I think so | 19:38 | |
rakudo: say 'foo'.subst(/o/, { uc $0 }, :g) | |||
p6eval | rakudo ecca70: OUTPUTĀ«Use of uninitialized valueā¤Use of uninitialized valueā¤fā¤Ā» | ||
moritz_ | rakudo: say 'foo'.subst(/o/, { .uc }, :g) | ||
p6eval | rakudo ecca70: OUTPUTĀ«fOOā¤Ā» | ||
moritz_ | rakudo: say 'foo'.subst(/o/, -> $x { $x[0].uc }, :g) | 19:39 | |
p6eval | rakudo ecca70: OUTPUTĀ«Use of uninitialized valueā¤Use of uninitialized valueā¤fā¤Ā» | ||
moritz_ | ok, it's passed in as topic $_ | ||
Tene | ah | ||
moritz++ | |||
also in $/ | |||
19:42
kate21de joined
19:44
ZuLuuuuuu left
|
|||
moritz_ | if it's also in $/, why doesn't $0 work? | 19:45 | |
it's an alias into $/ | |||
rakudo: say 'foo'.subst(/o/, -> $x { $/.uc }, :g) | |||
p6eval | rakudo ecca70: OUTPUTĀ«fOOā¤Ā» | ||
moritz_ | a bug, probably | 19:46 | |
19:51
rblasch1 joined
19:57
exodist left
20:08
rblasch left
|
|||
pugs_svn | r26252 | moritz++ | [t/spec] revert r26201 (except the part that touches TASKS) | 20:15 | |
r26252 | moritz++ | | |||
r26252 | moritz++ | The spec changed split($delimiter, $input) again, so we track that | |||
dalek | kudo: 01d7ded | (Moritz Lenz)++ | (2 files): Revert "The sub form of split() expects the delimiter as second parameter" |
20:18 | |
20:22
payload joined
20:27
TimToady left,
diakopter left
20:28
payload left,
payload joined
|
|||
moritz_ | @seen masak | 20:31 | |
lambdabot | I saw masak leaving #perl6 9h 39m 21s ago, and . | ||
20:35
TimToady joined
|
|||
dalek | kudo: 616c0b7 | (Moritz Lenz)++ | docs/ChangeLog: remove ChangeLog entry that was reverted |
20:36 | |
20:36
diakopter joined
|
|||
skids wonders whether comb is supposed to follow splits | 20:41 | ||
split's example | |||
i.e. currently no sub form is defined. | |||
(specced, that is) | 20:43 | ||
20:44
frew|work joined
|
|||
moritz_ | S32 mentions the split function | 20:48 | |
wait | |||
my copy of the spec isn't up to date | |||
it does have a sub form. | |||
20:50
stas__ left,
stas__ joined
20:55
ispy_ left
20:57
ejs0 left
20:59
rafl joined
21:00
rafl_ left
21:02
mofino left
|
|||
skids | So Str.pod should have a proto? But which param order? | 21:05 | |
21:06
jiing_ joined
|
|||
moritz_ | it has one | 21:06 | |
skids | Are we looking at the same file? I see a method proto, no sub proto. | 21:07 | |
or are we counting the is export, and assuming the spec really means to have different param order than split/ | 21:08 | ||
omega | from the discussion at npw today I think the method should be string, delim and the function delim, string | ||
moritz_ | skids: I'm looking at svn.pugscode.org/pugs/docs/Perl6/Sp...ry/Str.pod | ||
21:08
ejs0 joined
|
|||
moritz_ | and it does have two multi's without 'method' after it, which default to sub | 21:09 | |
skids | Yes, split, I'm talking about comb | ||
moritz_ | ah | 21:10 | |
the 'is export' generates a sub | |||
skids | right but it has the ordering split used to be specced to have. | ||
PerlJam | split is still specced with that ordering :) | 21:11 | |
moritz_ | aye | ||
skids | so the question is whether that's supposed to stay like that or not | ||
moritz_ | PerlJam: s/still/again/ | ||
omega | the spec was always wrong for the function order | ||
21:11
jiing left
|
|||
omega | but pugs (and hence rakudo) got it wrong | 21:11 | |
or so I was explained it today at least | |||
skids | Right, until today. | 21:12 | |
When the spec for split got corrected. | |||
omega | then someone fixed rakudo to follow the spec | ||
moritz_ | ... until I implemented it according the spec, which TimToady didn't seem to like ;-) | ||
omega | and that broke november, so the discussion started | ||
and the spec got changed | |||
skids | Yeah so my question is, do we want the sub form of comb to look like the sub form of split. | 21:13 | |
PerlJam | skids: I think comb should be specced with the same parameter orderings as split | ||
moritz_ | I agree with PerlJam, and I think that the tests already have it that way | ||
skids | So maybe I'll add a sub proto to comb in Str.pod and see if it gets yanked back out :-) | 21:14 | |
PerlJam | skids: sounds like a plan | ||
moritz_ | it seems we have no test at all for the parameter order of comb() | 21:15 | |
the only test for the sub form actually tests the names of the parameters ;-) | 21:16 | ||
skids | I'm still a little foggy on some details: the statement about "returns a list of C<Char> from anything that can give you a C<Str>" would still hold true for $thing.comb(/./)? | 21:19 | |
moritz_ | wouldn't it return a list of Match objects anyway? | 21:20 | |
PerlJam | skids: that's foggy to you, but not that business about cats? | ||
21:20
wknight8111 joined
|
|||
skids | Cats don't bother me, except the four legged variety, which are very bothersome :-) | 21:20 | |
I think the matches would stringify? | 21:21 | ||
PerlJam | comb is like a grep for strings | ||
moritz_ | skids: sure | ||
but it still doesn't return list of Chars, does it? | 21:22 | ||
21:22
barney left
|
|||
skids | Technically, no :-) | 21:22 | |
Of wait, technicality -- it only returns Match when there are capturing groups. | 21:23 | ||
PerlJam | are you still talking about comb? | ||
skids | Yeah. | 21:24 | |
moritz_ | we had something similar in the split case, which was then substituted by the :all flag | ||
PerlJam | that doesn't make sense to me | ||
what moritz_ said | |||
(apply that to comb) | |||
21:24
donaldh joined
|
|||
skids digs further into the .split verbiage | 21:25 | ||
PerlJam | comb and split would then be symmetric :) | ||
skids | Shame on me for trying to get away with a simple proto add :-) | ||
21:25
ruoso left
|
|||
moritz_ | ;-) | 21:26 | |
21:26
PhatEddy joined
21:27
stas__ left
21:28
stas__ joined
|
|||
skids | Ergh. I'm torn between the two explanations of cruft|intent and the goals of utility|consistency | 21:33 | |
First off comb still is specced to have a default value, and this looks intentional, since it is pointed towards as the ease of use alternative to split in the split verbiage. | 21:34 | ||
moritz_ | it has a default rule, but not a default value | 21:36 | |
skids | So if it has a default value, why not keep the also-convenient non-Matchiness of non-capturing regexes (which include the default value) | ||
Right. | |||
moritz_ | skids: because the capture-or-no-capture question can't be answered at compile time of the pattern (unlike perl 5) | ||
a regex line / [ a | (b) ] / will have a capture if the b matches, but not if the a matches | 21:37 | ||
so if you hand such a pattern to comb, what should it do? | |||
examine the first match, and then decide on a type? or decide for every match individually? | 21:38 | ||
or examine all matches first (and kill lazyness)? | |||
skids | good point. | ||
One answer might be: not do anything special with the captures (still return strings) unless :all | 21:39 | ||
rather than always return matches. | 21:40 | ||
moritz_ | aye | ||
skids | Though it's not QUITE the same thing as split :all, in that you do not get delimiters. | ||
But then, if you want that, use split. | |||
moritz_ | yes, we'd need a better name | ||
skids | :match | 21:41 | |
? | |||
moritz_ | dunno | ||
I'm too tired to think about design decisions :/ | 21:42 | ||
skids | :-) | ||
moritz_ | bed time for me | ||
see you | |||
skids | good n8 | 21:43 | |
PerlJam | I was thinking something like that earlier. | ||
(:match) | |||
21:44
iblechbot left
|
|||
skids | But then the current behavior isn't that awful: it doesn't decide between strings and matches at runtime, just says if I see a () in there, you are getting a Match. | 21:44 | |
Though I am not sure how much work that is for the compiler to figure. | |||
PerlJam | I don't care how much work it is for the compiler, I care how surprisey it is for the user :) | 21:45 | |
skids | :match would be more obvious, true. | ||
21:45
pyrimidine joined
|
|||
pmichaud | good localtime | 21:46 | |
PerlJam | especially when the match may actually be a $var and the parens aren't obviously there. | ||
hey pm! how's npw? | |||
pmichaud | it's excellent. | ||
we're being very productive up here :-) | |||
skids | There's something about "delimiters must be considered constants, not rules" | 21:47 | |
PerlJam | skids: for string delimiters, not regex. | 21:48 | |
pm: so ... what are you producing? | |||
pm: more tests? more working perl6? more people willing to work on perl6? | 21:49 | ||
pmichaud | for comb, I suspect that the synopsis is inaccurate and that .comb will always produces a list of matches | ||
that's my guess based on recent changes to split() | |||
pm: more people working on perl6, and more working perl6 | |||
PerlJam | cool | ||
wayland76 | yay! :) | 21:51 | |
pmichaud | std: .=abs | ||
p6eval | std 26252: OUTPUTĀ«ok 00:02 35mā¤Ā» | ||
pmichaud | std: .= abs | 21:52 | |
p6eval | std 26252: OUTPUTĀ«##### PARSE FAILED #####ā¤Can't understand next input--giving up at /tmp/wZVvK8gWfH line 1:ā¤------> .= absā¤ expecting dotty method or postfixā¤FAILED 00:02 34mā¤Ā» | ||
pmichaud | a-ha | ||
PerlJam | LTM! :) | ||
skids | pmichaud: well, split still returns strings for the non-delimiter portion, which is usually the "stuff I want" whereas the "stuff I want" in comb is in the rule. | ||
PerlJam | (.=abs is one funky op) | ||
pmichaud | no, I think it's that dottyop doesn't like whitespace between the '=' and the methodname | 21:53 | |
skids | And if we want "P5's split(' ') to be comb" then a list of Matches is not really that. | ||
pmichaud | "P5's split(' ') is comb(/\S+/) | ||
which when used as a list of strings will be exactly that. | 21:54 | ||
skids | And comb's default rule is /\S+/ | ||
pmichaud | i.e., the string value of each returned match object will be the "stuff I want" | ||
PerlJam | pm: except that you normally want the strings and not the matches. | ||
pmichaud | pj: what's the difference between the strings and matches in this case? | ||
since the match objects in string context will be the matched strings | 21:55 | ||
PerlJam | yeah, except you may have to force the context. | 21:56 | |
skids | Will they behave the same in all possible contexts? We can't assume the user will place them only in a Str context. | ||
pmichaud | I don't think the point of comb is necessarily to return strings. If that _is_ the intent, then I suspect that the paragraph "If there are captures in the pattern..." is bogus. | ||
PerlJam | I agree about the bogosity :) | 21:57 | |
That's why there should be a :match thingy instead | |||
normally you get strings, but if you want Match objects, you pass :match | |||
pmichaud | I think that for most usages, having comb return a list of Matches is the right thing | 21:58 | |
skids thinks just replacing "If there are captures" with "If :match adverb is applied" | |||
21:58
nihiliad left
|
|||
skids | and keeping the paragraph | 21:58 | |
PerlJam | pm: perhaps. this is where I lean the other way, but would need some real world examples. | ||
pmichaud | I think that getting a list of strings might be ~<< .comb | 21:59 | |
PerlJam | It would *have* to be that if we only got Match objects out. | ||
skids | I think the default matcher rule is a clue that comb is supposed to be a more naive api. | 22:00 | |
pmichaud | perhaps. But since the spec explicitly says | 22:01 | |
Saying | |||
$string.comb(/pat/, $n) | |||
is equivalent to | |||
$string.match(rx:global:x(0..$n):c/pat/) | |||
... that looks to me like it should be a list of matches | |||
since that's what $string.match(...) would return | |||
PerlJam | (at least until skids changes it to read otherwise ;-) | ||
skids | :-) | ||
pyrimidine | spec fight! | ||
skids | ~<<$string.match(rx:global:x(0..$n):c/pat/) | 22:02 | |
OK, well, I'll put the :match stuff in, and then we can make a point to bring it to TimToady's attention and see if he can tiebreak. | 22:03 | ||
22:04
stas__ left
|
|||
skids | Oh wait ~<< doesn't guarantee order. :-D | 22:04 | |
arnsholt | Apart from the synopses and actual Perl 6 code people are working on now, are there any other recommended resources to get a handle on the language? | 22:05 | |
PerlJam | arnsholt: not really. Read code. Read the synopses. | ||
arnsholt | Yeah, that's what I thought | 22:06 | |
PerlJam | I think merlyn is waiting for an actual release before he makes "Learning Perl 6" | ||
skids | arnsholt: www.perlfoundation.org/perl6/index....n_sections | ||
pmichaud | we have actual releases. :-) | ||
PerlJam | you know what I mean! | ||
22:07
pmurias left
|
|||
pmichaud | Actually, I think that merlyn et al were waiting for more stable releases, as opposed to "actual releases". But we're almost there. | 22:07 | |
22:07
stas__ joined
|
|||
PerlJam | xmas almost or closer? | 22:07 | |
arnsholt | skids: Oooh. That one has a lot of links. Cheers | ||
PerlJam | (assuming xmas is 1.0) | ||
pmichaud | I'm hoping to fix rakudo's "make install" target while at the hackathon, and after that we can start looking at precompiled binaries adn the like | 22:08 | |
before now part of the issue was that it was hard to find a consistent way to obtain rakudo (or any working perl 6) | |||
arnsholt | Bah. I wish I were able to attend the hackathon. Just not possible unfortunately | ||
But the workshop was really interesting, so that makes up for it I suppose | 22:09 | ||
skids | rakudo: 1.Str.say | ||
p6eval | rakudo 616c0b: OUTPUTĀ«Int<0x8525608>ā¤Ā» | ||
PerlJam pulls and builds rakudo for the first time in over a week. | 22:10 | ||
22:14
wknight8111 left
22:17
wknight8111 joined
|
|||
PerlJam | std: foo(,3) | 22:17 | |
p6eval | std 26252: OUTPUTĀ«##### PARSE FAILED #####ā¤Can't understand next input--giving up at /tmp/j2j8kkWzZr line 1:ā¤------> foo(,3)ā¤ expecting any of:ā¤ argument listā¤ prefix or nounā¤ standard stopperā¤ terminatorā¤ whitespaceā¤FAILED 00:03 37mā¤Ā» | ||
PerlJam | Is there a way to elide a positional paramter (to accept the default) but specify later parameters? | 22:18 | |
(without using the named syntax obviously) | 22:20 | ||
pugs_svn | r26253 | skids++ | Make comb consistent with split. | ||
r26253 | skids++ | Comb capturing parens snooping replaced with :match adverb (pending approval) | |||
r26253 | skids++ | Provide at least a one-liner description of split before thunking the | |||
r26253 | skids++ | reader over the head with esoteric subject matter. | |||
22:22
FurnaceBoy joined
22:23
frew|work left,
donaldh left
22:28
stas__ left,
ejs joined
|
|||
skids | PerlJam: on a sub you are writing, or one in someone else's code? For the former, "use //= in the body" is what the spec says. | 22:30 | |
22:35
rblasch1 left
|
|||
pmichaud | skids: I think he means "in a sub I am calling" | 22:38 | |
i.e.,: sub foo($a = 4, $b = 5) { ... } | |||
how do I call foo() such that it accepts the default value for $a but I provide a value for $b (short of using named parameters) | |||
anyway, time for sleep here -- bbl. | 22:40 | ||
meppuru | good night | 22:41 | |
22:42
meppuru left
22:45
ejs0 left
22:48
pyrimidine left
|
|||
skids | well then I guess the answer is, you don't. Instead you find the person who wrote an api without documenting the names of their positional parameters and apply a wet haddock to their head. | 22:49 | |
at which point they say "hey don't do that I used //= in the body! just pass an undef and stop hitting me with that!" | 22:50 | ||
22:52
PhatEddy left
|
|||
literal | github.com/perl6/ <-- who's this? :P | 22:56 | |
23:04
alester left
|
|||
skids | what, there are username squatters these day? | 23:07 | |
23:10
jbt left
|
|||
wayland76 | I'm hoping it's pmichaud or someone. That would be a good place to put Specs + STD + test suite | 23:11 | |
pmichaud | it's me. | 23:13 | |
and yes, I grabbed it with the thought that we could use it as a git-based location for specs, std, test suite, and example code | |||
I've been wanting to write a post suggesting that we move things there (eventually), but haven't gotten round tuit | 23:14 | ||
okay, I'm really heading off to bed now. bbl. | 23:15 | ||
wayland76 | 'night | 23:16 | |
23:20
ejs left
23:25
araujo joined
23:27
ejs joined
23:29
kate21de1 joined
23:33
kate21de left
23:40
jwest-- joined,
jwest-- left
23:46
kirillm joined,
aindilis left
23:50
aindilis joined
|