»ö« Welcome to Perl 6! | perl6.org/ | evalbot usage: 'p6: say 3;' or rakudo:, or /msg camelia p6: ... | irclog: irc.perl6.org or colabti.org/irclogger/irclogger_logs/perl6 | UTF-8 is our friend! Set by moritz on 22 December 2015. |
|||
mscha | m: my @a = 4,5,6; my @b = (1,2,3, |@a); say @b; | 00:04 | |
camelia | rakudo-moar d4a0e0: OUTPUT«[1 2 3 4 5 6]» | ||
mscha | Not very well documented, that is... | ||
parabolize | tbrowder: here is where I think he posted it irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2016-06-23#i_12720216 | 00:13 | |
00:23
ssotka left
|
|||
dalek | c: b36a6b2 | (Tom Browder)++ | doc/Language/traps.pod: add info on space probs with function call format |
00:33 | |
c: 7d6d5c3 | (Tom Browder)++ | doc/Language/traps.pod: remove blurb about possible change |
|||
c: 90efa03 | (Zoffix Znet)++ | doc/Language/traps.pod: Merge pull request #637 from tbrowder/func-trap add info on space probs with function call format (second attempt) |
|||
00:34
spider-mario left
00:38
Zoffix joined
|
|||
lizmat | is irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6-dev/today dead only for me, or are there more people not getting it ? | 00:41 | |
Zoffix | dead here too | 00:42 | |
00:45
mscha left
|
|||
jdv79 | is that moritz? mortiz. | 00:47 | |
Xliff | Dead here, too | ||
jdv79 | ditto. nicht gut. | ||
00:52
ssotka joined
00:58
lambd0x joined
01:09
tbrowder left
01:12
tbrowder joined
01:17
tbrowder left
01:18
kurahaupo_ left
01:20
kalkin- left,
kalkin-_ joined
01:22
daxim left
01:26
daxim joined
01:31
Bodger1 joined
01:34
jjido joined
01:37
RabidGravy left,
Bodger1 left
01:38
Bodger1 joined
01:39
jjido left,
TakinOver left
01:41
Ptolemarch joined,
Ptolemarch left
01:42
Bodger1 is now known as Bodger1234
01:46
ilbot3 left
01:47
ilbot3 joined
|
|||
Zoffix | Does NQP offer some sort of dd function that I could use to dump data to see what it is? I'm trying to see what $cur_GLOBALish.WHO returns :/ | 01:47 | |
01:48
TakinOver joined
|
|||
Zoffix | (but in general, the "dump this to see what it is" comes up often for me) | 01:48 | |
01:49
daxim left
01:54
daxim joined
|
|||
lizmat | Zoffix: I'd like an answer to that one as well :-) | 01:55 | |
Zoffix | :) | ||
02:00
molaf left
02:07
cdg left
02:12
molaf joined
02:14
noganex joined
02:18
noganex_ left
02:20
kaare_ joined
02:31
_mg_ joined
02:32
_mg_ left
02:42
_mg_ joined
02:43
_mg_ left
02:44
_mg_ joined
02:45
_mg_ left
02:47
skids joined
02:50
lambd0x left
03:02
lambd0x joined
03:15
TEttinger joined
03:22
kid51 left
|
|||
lambd0x | :q | 03:25 | |
03:26
lambd0x left
|
|||
lizmat | success! :-) | 03:28 | |
03:28
pdcawley left
|
|||
Zoffix | :) | 03:35 | |
03:39
huggable left
03:54
_mg_ joined
|
|||
llfourn | irclog.perlgeek.de/ # seems to be down atm | 03:54 | |
Zoffix | It is. The admin is sleeping ATM. | ||
llfourn | kk | 03:55 | |
03:55
_mg_ left
|
|||
sammers | c | 04:02 | |
04:02
pdcawley joined
04:14
dupek joined
04:16
daxim left
04:28
khw left
04:37
djbkd joined
04:41
djbkd left
04:43
xinming joined
04:46
xinming_ left
|
|||
ugexe | nine: for back compat this is probably the only real way: gist.github.com/ugexe/72b5e491fddb...039725872a or else inheritance will be non back compat, in which case it might as well be broken completely to save on all the technical debt shims | 04:53 | |
04:55
Cabanossi left
04:58
Cabanossi joined
|
|||
Xliff | can custom trait mods be exported? | 05:07 | |
05:09
bjz left
|
|||
jdv79 | can't think of why not at the moment | 05:17 | |
05:25
raiph joined
|
|||
llfourn | sub trait_mod:<is>(...) is export {...} # works | 05:26 | |
05:49
brrt joined
05:55
grondilu joined
05:57
brrt left
05:58
skids left
06:05
CIAvash joined
06:09
brrt joined
06:17
domidumont joined
06:21
domidumont left,
domidumont joined
|
|||
psch | m: module Foo { sub trait_mod:<is>($x, :$fooey) is export { $x but role { method foo { "foo" } } } }; import Foo; class A is Int { } # you probably want a multi though | 06:22 | |
camelia | rakudo-moar a556a8: OUTPUT«5===SORRY!5=== Error while compiling <tmp>Unexpected named parameter 'export' passedat <tmp>:1» | ||
llfourn | (err yes you want a multi psch++) | 06:30 | |
m: module Foo { multi trait_mod:<is>(Mu $x, :$fooey) is export { $x.^add_role(role { method foo { "foo" } }) } }; import Foo; class A is fooey { }; say A.foo # This works but "but" doesn't | 06:35 | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar a556a8: OUTPUT«foo» | ||
llfourn | I guess but doesn't modify the original thing right? | 06:37 | |
m: say Int but Bag | |||
camelia | rakudo-moar a556a8: OUTPUT«Cannot mix in non-composable type Bag into object of type Int in block <unit> at <tmp> line 1» | ||
llfourn | m: say Int but Baggy | 06:38 | |
camelia | rakudo-moar a556a8: OUTPUT«(Int+{Baggy})» | ||
llfourn | m: my $a = Int; say $a but Baggy; say $a | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar a556a8: OUTPUT«(Int+{Baggy})(Int)» | ||
06:38
brrt left
|
|||
llfourn | and I don't think return value from trait_mod:<is> is used | 06:38 | |
psch | right, you'd have to either make $x sigilless or 'is rw', but then you get composition order problems or something it looks like | 06:41 | |
m: multi sub trait_mod:<is>(Mu $x is rw, :$fooey) { $x but role { method foo { "foo" } } }; class A is fooey { }; | |||
camelia | rakudo-moar a556a8: OUTPUT«5===SORRY!5=== Error while compiling <tmp>'A' cannot inherit from 'fooey' because it is unknown.at <tmp>:1» | ||
psch | m: multi sub trait_mod:<is>($x is rw, :$fooey) { $x but role { method foo { "foo" } } }; class A is fooey { }; | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar a556a8: OUTPUT«5===SORRY!5=== Error while compiling <tmp>'A' cannot inherit from 'fooey' because it is unknown.at <tmp>:1» | ||
psch | m: multi sub trait_mod:<is>(Mu:U $x is rw, :$fooey) { $x but role { method foo { "foo" } } }; class A is fooey { }; | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar a556a8: OUTPUT«5===SORRY!5=== Error while compiling <tmp>'A' cannot inherit from 'fooey' because it is unknown.at <tmp>:1» | ||
psch | ah, no, just dispatch in &trait_mod:<is> | ||
llfourn | I think you can't "but" things before they are composed? | ||
m: class Foo { BEGIN say Foo but Int } | 06:42 | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar a556a8: OUTPUT«5===SORRY!5=== Error while compiling <tmp>An exception occurred while evaluating a BEGINat <tmp>:1Exception details: X::Mixin::NotComposable exception produced no message in code at <tmp> line 1» | ||
psch | m: class A { method new { self but role { method m { "foo" } } } }; | ||
camelia | ( no output ) | ||
psch | i don't think we're done composing during .new..? | ||
llfourn | yeah we are? | ||
psch | alright then :) | ||
llfourn | the type is composed is what I mean | 06:43 | |
psch | right | ||
llfourn | not any specific object | ||
06:46
wamba joined
06:47
bjz joined
|
|||
psch | yeah, that makes sense | 06:49 | |
m: multi sub trait_mod:<is>(Mu \x, :$fooey) { x but role { method foo { "foo" } } }; class A is fooey { }; | 06:50 | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar a556a8: OUTPUT«5===SORRY!5=== Error while compiling <tmp>'A+{<anon|73771392>}' cannot inherit from 'A' because 'A' isn't composed yet (maybe it is stubbed)at <tmp>:1» | ||
psch | i like this failure mode :) | ||
it's perfectly sensible too, we're still building the type object for A when A has to be A+{<anon>} | 06:51 | ||
llfourn | yep, rakudo++ | 06:52 | |
psch | i think it's a bit sad that we can only had new trait_mod keywords via a Slang | 06:54 | |
but well, it does seems somewhat reasonable from a "know what language you're in" perspective | |||
s/somewhat// | |||
that's also part of why the fooey trait above doesn't work i guess | 06:55 | ||
'cause <is> always looks for a typename | |||
06:56
domidumont left
|
|||
llfourn | maybe someday | 06:56 | |
06:56
RabidGravy joined
|
|||
llfourn | we already have custom type declarators with EXPORTHOW | 06:56 | |
psch | right, but that is effectively a Slang | 06:57 | |
'cause you're messing with %*LANG, if in a user-unfriendly way | |||
llfourn | but so are custom infixes etc? that's just how we change the parser in rakudo. | ||
psch | yeah | 06:58 | |
that's also why NC had horribly large moarvm bytecode files | |||
because it declares the HAS declarator | |||
which is why it was moved to Perl6::Grammar | |||
llfourn | ah I didn't notice that change. | 06:59 | |
psch | that's something of a medium-effort-high-reward thing, too | ||
figuring out a way to subclass the language braid without having to clone it completely | |||
well, i'd think it's medium effort, but it might be somewhat high vOv | |||
llfourn | when you write a slang you have to "clone" the language braid? | 07:00 | |
psch | well, you subclass it | ||
llfourn | so shouldn't that be efficient? | ||
psch | which is clone + add stuff, from a memory perspective | ||
(still highlevel-ish "memory perspective" :P ) | 07:01 | ||
llfourn | oh ok. So when you serialize it you serialize the whole thing? | ||
psch | yeah, that's what seemed to have happened with NC at least | ||
llfourn | I see. | ||
psch | i mean, there were something like 50mb precomp files for a module with around 10k loc or so..? | 07:02 | |
llfourn | o.o | ||
psch | don't recall the exact details, it was maybe two weeks ago | ||
07:03
CIAvash left
|
|||
psch | ac0dcddb11e4 is the commit in question | 07:04 | |
that day and the day before in the clog has the discussion | |||
i.e. Jun 14 | |||
07:05
brrt joined
|
|||
dupek | hey which web perl framework best to use? | 07:09 | |
brrt | dupek: for perl6? | 07:13 | |
for perl5, ymmv, i like mojolicious a lot | |||
for perl6 there are several projects in some stage of development | |||
dupek | brrt, when I look at mojolicious it took third place | ||
brrt | and i couldn't tell you | ||
ok, well, i guess we like different things :-) | 07:14 | ||
dupek | brrt, not I just think | ||
brrt | what would you prefer above mojolicious? | ||
just out of curiosity | 07:15 | ||
07:16
jjido joined
07:18
CIAvash joined
07:27
dupek left
07:32
TakinOver left
07:35
ilbot3 left,
ilbot3 joined
07:40
huggable joined
07:42
ssotka left
07:51
firstdayonthejob joined,
lizmat left
|
|||
Woodi | m: my @a = <a b c>; say @a.perl; dd @a | 07:52 | |
camelia | rakudo-moar a556a8: OUTPUT«["a", "b", "c"]Array @a = ["a", "b", "c"]» | ||
07:54
lizmat joined,
jjido left
07:58
jjido joined
07:59
hankache joined
08:00
jjido left
08:05
dupek joined
08:15
rindolf joined
|
|||
BooK | I'm starting a new project in Perl6, and I plan to write some Perl5 modules if needed (e.g. DBIC modules) if the stuff I want is not available in Perl6 yet | 08:46 | |
08:46
jmark joined
|
|||
BooK | so I have two questions: | 08:46 | |
1. is that sane and is Inline::Perl5 up to it? | 08:47 | ||
2. how do I name my lib directories? (I was thinking lib and lib5, since it's supposed to be mainly perl6) | |||
moritz | BooK: yes, and sounds sensible | 08:49 | |
dogbert17 | good morning #perl6 | 08:52 | |
moritz: regarding my certificate problems yesterday, turns out my antivirus was to blame | 08:54 | ||
moritz | dogbert17: those things are the devil's doing | 08:57 | |
dogbert17 | indeed, I have now turned off something ESET calls 'SSL/TLS Protocol Filtering' | 08:58 | |
and docs.perl6.org comes up without any problems | |||
hankache | what's an anti-virus? | 09:03 | |
;) | 09:04 | ||
moritz | hankache: a virus made from anti matter | ||
hankache | hehe | 09:05 | |
09:05
FROGGS joined
|
|||
hankache | any recommendations for a vps? What do you know/think of linode? | 09:06 | |
moritz | linode has a terrible security track record | 09:08 | |
I use OVH, and they are OK | 09:09 | ||
hosteurope also has a good-ish reputation in the low-cost sector | |||
also digitial ocean | 09:11 | ||
hankache | moritz i'll look at them now | ||
moritz thanks | |||
moritz | hankache: if you go with digital ocean or linode, there are a few promo codes that get you one month for free | ||
09:15
brrt left
|
|||
hankache | moritz which OVH vps are you using (SSD/Cloud RAM/Cloud)? | 09:15 | |
one of them is RAM supercharged | 09:16 | ||
moritz | hankache: uhm, dunno, I think I have 2GB RM | 09:18 | |
VPS 2016 SSD 1 | 09:20 | ||
seems to be the product | |||
09:21
brrt joined
|
|||
moritz | I use it to host sudokugarden.de, which gets about 45k visitors a month | 09:21 | |
(and it mostly idles) | |||
hankache | aha | 09:22 | |
moritz i want to play a bit with perl 6 and bailador do you think 1 GB RAM is enough? | 09:29 | ||
or should I go for 2? | |||
09:29
rindolf left
09:30
brrt left
|
|||
moritz | hankache: you should go with 2 | 09:31 | |
simply for compiling rakudo | |||
hankache | moritz indeed | 09:32 | |
is one core enough? | 09:36 | ||
hahainternet | you don't run out of cores in the same way as ram :) | 09:39 | |
hankache | yup | 09:41 | |
the question is would rakudo compile on a single core? | 09:42 | ||
or will it take forever | |||
09:42
espadrine joined,
rindolf joined
09:47
TEttinger left
09:48
vaisian joined
|
|||
hahainternet | hankache: i compiled rakudo on a dual core 2.8ghz machine with 8gb ram | 09:51 | |
it didn't take very long at all iirc | |||
psch | i don't think the number of cores really matters | ||
there's very few bits in the rakudo build process that can be paralized | |||
err | |||
parallelized? | |||
hankache | hahaha | 09:52 | |
indeed | |||
hahainternet | looks like it was 8 min 30s for me | 09:53 | |
on this crap old machine | |||
so 1 core on a newer machine would probably be faster | |||
09:54
spider-mario joined
09:55
kaare_ left,
kaare_ joined
|
|||
hankache | thank you | 09:56 | |
hahainternet | you're welcome | ||
grondilu | "there's very few bits in the rakudo build process that can be | 09:59 | |
09:59
AlexDaniel joined
|
|||
grondilu | paralized" I find it surprising | 09:59 | |
hahainternet | so i've been thinking about perl, perl6 and 'compile time decisions' and it strikes me that a rich, complex object system is also shooting yourself in the foot in some areas | 10:01 | |
psch | grondilu: why? we're concatenating all of src/ into three or so files that depend on compilation in a specific order | ||
hahainternet | like how type subsets for the most part have to be decided at runtime | ||
does anyone have any resources on heavily restricted languages where most if not all expressions can be decided at compile time? | 10:02 | ||
psch | C++? | ||
10:02
iH2O joined
|
|||
hahainternet | C++ is the opposite of a restricted language, the template system is turing complete on its own | 10:02 | |
grondilu | psch: I was thinking of the many files in src/core and I had hard time imagining that they need to be compiled in sequence. | ||
psch | oh, yeah, i must've overlooked that | ||
hahainternet | psch: i mean something where you could do NonEmptyWhatever where { .something > 0 } | ||
in perl6, that .something call has to be looked up at runtime afaik | |||
and the fact that the halting problem precludes some 'optimisation' | 10:03 | ||
psch | hahainternet: right, because we cannot decide method dispatch at compile time | ||
tadzik | hahainternet: well, it is compile-tiem though :) | ||
hahainternet | well i'm not criticising perl6 | ||
or trying to make any claims about it | |||
just looking for an alternative option to read about and understand | 10:04 | ||
i guess f# or haskell or ocaml prly the way as usual | |||
psch | grondilu: well, as mentioned, all of src/core/ is compiled as CORE.setting. and it *is* necessary, because e.g. Int.pm needs to be compiled after (and in the same scope as) e.g. Any.pm | ||
10:07
jmark left
10:10
firstdayonthejob left
10:12
firstdayonthejob joined
|
|||
AlexDaniel | think about it positively! If rakudo build is not parallelized, then you can run as many rakudo builds as you have cores! | 10:13 | |
not that it makes any sense :D | |||
but e.g. bisectable is building 7 at once | |||
10:23
iH2O left
10:24
ribasushi joined
10:27
Cabanossi left
10:29
Cabanossi joined
10:32
tbrowder joined,
hankache left
|
|||
tbrowder | 'mornin #perl6. can anyone explain briefly what a p6 dynamic variable is? I know there is a list of them that essentially are language globals, but what about user-defined ones. Are they the same except that they exist for the life of the program defining them? | 10:39 | |
psch thinks the doc page is pretty good and brief | 10:40 | ||
doc.perl6.org/routine/is%20dynamic | 10:41 | ||
and yes, the * twigil and the 'dynamic' trait do the same, to the best of my knowledge | |||
doc.perl6.org/syntax/*#language_do..._Variables | 10:42 | ||
that's a bit more extensive i suppose | |||
10:46
eugen left
|
|||
tbrowder | psch: the second ref gives me something to work with--thanks; I found the first with the search but the second doesn't show up in a search and it's new to me. | 10:46 | |
10:46
eugen joined
|
|||
psch | tbrowder: well, i found it searching for * and knowing what to look for, so i agree it's a bit hidden | 10:46 | |
tbrowder | right, I searched on dynamic | 10:47 | |
psch | (for reference, i clicked the 'Syntax' entry in the drop down) | ||
tbrowder | roger | ||
okay, now that I've looked at the syntax explanation, I don't understand, in a single script, why one would use a dynamic var declared and defined in an inner scope instead of using a file-scoped my var along with other such vars. the specific example is $*DR in htmlify.p6. Since the first time I saw that I wonder what magic is accomplished. | 10:53 | ||
psch | m: sub f { $*foo.say }; sub g { my $*foo = "bar"; f }; sub h { my $*foo = "baz"; f }; g; h; | 10:56 | |
camelia | rakudo-moar a556a8: OUTPUT«barbaz» | ||
psch | i mean, yeah, functionally it's not much different from a file-scoped lexical | ||
but then, functionally, ASM isn't that much different either, if you look close enough | |||
i find, especially in grammar/action code it's clearer to have a dynamic to follow | 10:57 | ||
tbrowder | okay, that's what I thought--thanks! | ||
psch | because you know you can trace upwards through the tokens/methods along your parsetree, and don't have to worry about out-of-band stuff | ||
s/you know/i know/ # :) | |||
tbrowder | oops, "ASM"? | 10:58 | |
psch | assembler | ||
tbrowder | ah... | ||
psch | i recognize that's not much a valid argument, hence why i followed up with a specific preference :) | ||
+of | |||
tbrowder | great, thanks! | 10:59 | |
it does look like a personal pref of the original author (or perhaps a last-minute def as he or she realized the var was needed or to emphasize its importance and use in multiple places) | 11:00 | ||
psch | well, there's also the old "global shared state is bad" vOv | ||
tbrowder | I agree for sure, but htmlify.p6 I don't think was originally meant as an exercise in "best practices"... | 11:01 | |
moritz | it was meant as "get *anything* displayed on the web" | 11:03 | |
(another priority was to display methods inherited from superclasses and roles on the same page, because I always hated the parent-class-chasing that you have to do for p5's LibXML modules, for example) | 11:09 | ||
tbrowder | moritz: I wasn't criticizing, in fact you say as much near the top of the prog, but I had to look hard to find some stuff because it looks like you used the power of p6 (esp. chained method calls) to minimize code--hard for a newbie to deal with! | 11:13 | |
i should say "full power"... | |||
moritz | tbrowder: I didn't take it as criticism | 11:16 | |
I know myself how hard it is to change and maintain htmlify | |||
Woodi just discovered his perl6-testing host have 2 cores :) Pentium4++ ;) | 11:18 | ||
...and 2Gb memory newer was limiting factor | 11:19 | ||
btw. is AMD solding any DDR4 CPUs ? | 11:20 | ||
dupek | hey, what does it mean no dereferencing is needed? | 11:23 | |
moritz | m: my $a = [ 1, 2, 3 ]; say $a[0]; # for dupek | 11:25 | |
camelia | rakudo-moar a556a8: OUTPUT«1» | ||
moritz | no special ->[0] magic as with p5 | ||
Xliff | How would I specify unicode chars in a regex? | ||
Can I use codes? | 11:26 | ||
say "\u00E0" | |||
m: say "\u00E0" | |||
camelia | rakudo-moar a556a8: OUTPUT«5===SORRY!5=== Error while compiling <tmp>Unrecognized backslash sequence: '\u'at <tmp>:1------> 3say "\7⏏5u00E0" expecting any of: argument list double quotes term» | ||
psch | m: say "\c[SNOWMAN]" ~~ /\x2603/ | 11:27 | |
camelia | rakudo-moar a556a8: OUTPUT«「☃」» | ||
psch | m: say "\c[SNOWMAN]" ~~ /\c[SNOWMAN]/ | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar a556a8: OUTPUT«「☃」» | ||
Xliff | psch++ | ||
psch | m: say "\c[SNOWMAN]" ~~ /☃/ | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar a556a8: OUTPUT«5===SORRY!5=== Error while compiling <tmp>Unrecognized regex metacharacter ☃ (must be quoted to match literally)at <tmp>:1------> 3say "\c[SNOWMAN]" ~~ /7⏏5☃/ expecting any of: term» | ||
psch | m: say "\c[SNOWMAN]" ~~ /'☃'/ | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar a556a8: OUTPUT«「☃」» | ||
dogbert17 | the code example at docs.perl6.org/language/mop#Metamethods doesn't work, anyone know what's wrong with it? | 11:28 | |
AlexDaniel | m: say Int.WHY | 11:29 | |
camelia | rakudo-moar a556a8: OUTPUT«(Any)» | ||
AlexDaniel | bisect: class MY-CLASSES-ARE-ALL-CAPS { method WHY { "I DONT KNOW" } }; my $c = MY-CLASSES-ARE-ALL-CAPS.new; say $c.WHY; say $c."WHY"() | 11:31 | |
bisectable | AlexDaniel: on both starting points the exit code is 0 and the output is identical as well | ||
AlexDaniel | ah forgot something… | ||
psch | m: #| THIS IS A CLASS FOR SHOUTING THINGS class MY-CLASSES-ARE-ALL-CAPS { method WHY { "I DON'T KNOW" } } my $c = MY-CLASSES-ARE-ALL-CAPS.new; say $c.WHY say $c."WHY"() # /o\ | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar a556a8: OUTPUT«5===SORRY!5=== Error while compiling <tmp>Method '_add_leading' not found for invocant of class 'Str'at <tmp>:2» | ||
psch | i don't even get why it wants to add to a Str | ||
but then i've never looked at that code | 11:32 | ||
bisect: #| THIS IS A CLASS FOR SHOUTING THINGS class MY-CLASSES-ARE-ALL-CAPS { method WHY { "I DON'T KNOW" } } my $c = MY-CLASSES-ARE-ALL-CAPS.new; say $c.WHY say $c."WHY"() # /o\ | 11:33 | ||
bisectable | psch: on both starting points the exit code is 0 and the output is identical as well | ||
moritz | dogbert17: what exactly doesn't work? | ||
geekosaur | at a guess, the part that allows a user provided WHY is NYI, so it's trying to add the #| text to the user provided WHY | ||
dogbert17 | moritz: it complains with Method '_add_leading' not found for invocant of class 'Str'at | ||
geekosaur | moritz, see camelia output | 11:34 | |
AlexDaniel | psch: I don't think that  is going to work :/ | ||
psch | AlexDaniel: oh, bisectable doesn't do that? | ||
AlexDaniel | yeah :/ | ||
psch | :/ | ||
AlexDaniel | well, let me fix that… | ||
psch | AlexDaniel++ | 11:35 | |
dogbert17 | AlexDaniel++ | ||
gfldex | nine: is precomp supposed to be thread safe? (silly question alert) | 11:36 | |
11:39
bisectable left,
huggable left
11:40
huggable joined,
bisectable joined
|
|||
AlexDaniel | bisect: #| THIS IS A CLASS FOR SHOUTING THINGS class MY-CLASSES-ARE-ALL-CAPS { method WHY { "I DON'T KNOW" } } my $c = MY-CLASSES-ARE-ALL-CAPS.new; say $c.WHY say $c."WHY"() # /o\ | 11:40 | |
bisectable | AlexDaniel: on both starting points the exit code is 1 and the output is identical as well | ||
AlexDaniel |  works now | ||
11:44
tbrowder left
|
|||
Xliff | Hrm.... | 11:46 | |
dalek | sectbot: 183b6d2 | (Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev)++ | bot.pl: Replace  with newlines |
||
11:46
bisectable left,
rindolf left
|
|||
Xliff | I just refreshed rakudo and this line used to work "nativecast(::('XML::LibXML::Element'), $node);" but now gives me "Internal error: unhandled target type" | 11:46 | |
11:46
bisectable joined
11:50
kid51 joined
|
|||
nine | gfldex: module loading in general is probably not yet thread safe | 12:07 | |
gfldex | nine: i could make you a tarball that segfaults quite nicely on my end if you want to dig your teeth into it | 12:10 | |
loading is fine actually, it only segfaults when the cache is filled | |||
12:14
Harmil joined
|
|||
Harmil | Morning all... quick question. hub.docker.com/r/mj41/perl6-star/ looks like the most current docker image of rakudo. Is that the right one to be using? | 12:15 | |
llfourn | Harmil: it looks a tad old | 12:16 | |
Harmil | Is there a more recent star release than 2 months? | 12:17 | |
AlexDaniel | just a little bit | ||
llfourn | Is it the same as: github.com/perl6/docker | ||
12:17
daxim joined
|
|||
llfourn | this looks liek the official one: hub.docker.com/_/rakudo-star/ | 12:18 | |
but it looks old too | 12:19 | ||
shouldn't it be auto-building on commits to rakudo? | |||
Harmil | Star != rakudo | ||
llfourn | right. sorry. | 12:20 | |
Harmil | Though, to be fair, I don't actually need star, it's more a matter of wanting a stable reference. | ||
llfourn | but you want a docker image right? | 12:21 | |
i'd say the official one maintained by hoelzro is the best | |||
but I guess that one you linked is ok "2016.04" is apparently the latest rakudo star | 12:22 | ||
Harmil | Cool, thanks | 12:23 | |
stmuk | there will probably be a star 2016.07 | ||
after next month's rakudo release | |||
psch | star-m: say $*PERL.compiler | 12:24 | |
camelia | star-m 2016.04: OUTPUT«rakudo (2016.04)» | ||
llfourn | m: $*PERL.compiler.say | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar a556a8: OUTPUT«rakudo (2016.06.46.ga.556.a.86)» | ||
12:51
bjz left
12:54
AlexDaniel left
|
|||
lizmat | Xliff: could you check whether a556a869ea9a56dc233 is to blame ? | 12:56 | |
13:00
bjz joined
|
|||
Xliff | lizmat: One sec | 13:03 | |
lizmat | Xliff: it probably is, and I pushed just a fix for it (I think) | 13:07 | |
if it isn't, someone else should probably revert a556a869ea9a56dc233 and e071e40b37d446c9 | 13:08 | ||
as I'll be afk& | |||
13:08
Harmil left
|
|||
Xliff | I'm checking 6d824ecc8cd8f4671c4f83728f67099d2c7bba11 right now | 13:11 | |
timotimo | hey | 13:13 | |
does anybody know if there's a way to not have processes crashing with segfaults show up in dmesg and such? | 13:16 | ||
because running afl-fuzz on hack gives me beautiful lines in the dmesg including ones like "show_signal_msg: 381 callbacks suppressed" | 13:17 | ||
Xliff | lizmat: Problem still exists. | 13:19 | |
Xliff read "dmesg" and thought "syslog" | 13:21 | ||
My bad. | |||
timotimo | well, there's also a bajillion segfault messages in the journal | 13:22 | |
Xliff | lizmat: Recompiling to e071e40b37d446c9 | ||
lizmat: Problem still exists on latest commit. I will have to git-bisect this and see. I should return to the last known working version and see if the problem really is perl6. | 13:28 | ||
13:32
hankache joined
|
|||
timotimo | unix.stackexchange.com/questions/2...s-in-dmesg - i implemented this on hack right now | 13:32 | |
we still have about 2.7 gigabytes of space taken on our / partition that's nothing but logs about segfaults | 13:37 | ||
Xliff | Felgercarb! | 13:38 | |
Looks like the problem is my code and not perl6. | |||
timotimo | the what now? | ||
that's a relief | |||
Xliff | Yes and no. | ||
Relief for you... nightmare for me. | |||
psch | imagine how you'd feel if it was both /o\ | ||
Xliff | /o\ indeed! | 13:39 | |
psch | #just-coredev-things | ||
scnr | |||
timotimo | :D | ||
Xliff | Weird thing is this part of the code didn't change. | ||
Now I will have to revert my code and see if I can make problem go away. | |||
However, first thing is food. Next thing is sleep. | |||
o7 | 13:40 | ||
13:40
Xliff is now known as Xliff_zzzz
|
|||
timotimo | have a good two :) | 13:40 | |
13:42
domidumont joined
13:48
kaare_ left
13:49
skids joined
13:54
TakinOver joined
13:56
brrt joined
14:02
zakharyas joined
|
|||
llfourn | so I noticed there was some segfault discussion. I'm now getting non-deterministic segfaults after rebuilding an hour or so ago. | 14:05 | |
not sure if it was rebuilding or me adding something to my code though. | |||
gfldex | llfourn: are you running more then 1 thread? | 14:06 | |
llfourn | nope. | ||
gfldex | my problems go away when just one thread | ||
do you got that code online? | |||
llfourn | no :\ | 14:07 | |
I guess I could, I'll investigate a bit further first. | |||
14:07
domidumont left
|
|||
gfldex | <-- code voyeur :-> | 14:08 | |
14:08
TakinOver left
14:10
tharkun_ left
14:11
TakinOver joined,
tharkun joined
14:14
rindolf joined
14:18
domidumont joined
14:22
khw joined
14:23
skids left
14:26
Zoffix left
14:34
TakinOver left
14:36
TakinOver joined
|
|||
llfourn | gfldex: backtrace: gist.github.com/LLFourn/135680d93e...5f3073b258 | 14:37 | |
trying to build with debug symbols to get more info | |||
further discussion in #perl6-dev if you're interested :) | 14:38 | ||
14:39
Zoffix joined
|
|||
ugexe | m: { class Foo { }; }; class Foo { }; # is this intended? (i realize I can `my class ...` it) | 14:53 | |
camelia | rakudo-moar e071e4: OUTPUT«5===SORRY!5=== Error while compiling <tmp>Redeclaration of symbol Fooat <tmp>:1------> 3{ class Foo { }; }; class Foo7⏏5 { }; # is this intended? (i realize I c expecting any of: generic role» | ||
dalek | c: 8616126 | (Jan-Olof Hendig)++ | doc/Language/variables.pod: Added a couple of missing semicolons in code example |
14:56 | |
14:57
jluis joined
14:58
jluis left,
jluis joined
15:00
buharin__ joined
15:02
dupek left
|
|||
gfldex | ugexe: S12 provides the following wisdom: Without a my or other scoping declarator, a bare class declarator declares an our declarator, that is, a name within the current package. | 15:03 | |
15:05
domidumont left,
vaisian left
15:08
vaisian joined
|
|||
ugexe | ah. but what am I missing that `sub Bar { class Foo { }; }; class Foo { };` still fails? or that `sub Bar { our $xxx; }; Bar(); say $xxx` gives a symbol $xxx is undeclared (yes, OUR::<$xxx>, but still) | 15:08 | |
timotimo | variables aren't looked up in package scope unless you ask for it ... or something like that? | 15:09 | |
i basically never use package-scoped variables, tbh | |||
15:10
jluis left
15:11
kurahaupo joined
|
|||
ugexe | m: sub Bar { class Foo { }; }; class Foo { }; # sub { } is a scoping declarator isn't it? | 15:11 | |
camelia | rakudo-moar e071e4: OUTPUT«5===SORRY!5=== Error while compiling <tmp>Redeclaration of symbol Fooat <tmp>:1------> 3sub Bar { class Foo { }; }; class Foo7⏏5 { }; # sub { } is a scoping declarator  expecting any of: generic role» | ||
ugexe | oh it means on the class declaration, not inside one | 15:12 | |
timotimo | classes aren't "my" by default | 15:13 | |
15:15
kaare_ joined,
domidumont joined
|
|||
Zoffix | m: { our $foo = 42 }; our $foo = 32; say $foo | 15:16 | |
camelia | rakudo-moar e071e4: OUTPUT«32» | ||
15:16
spider-mario left
|
|||
Zoffix | m: { our $foo = 42 }; our $foo; say $foo | 15:17 | |
camelia | rakudo-moar e071e4: OUTPUT«42» | ||
Zoffix | .oO( should probably warn, eh? ) |
||
ugexe | right, but `{ my sub Bar { class Foo { }; }; }; class Foo { };` seems a bit strange in that regard | ||
jnthn | It's a weird thing to write, but the error is correct. | 15:19 | |
Needs to be `my class Foo ...` to lexically scope the symbol | |||
(Noting also that classes are a compile-time construct, so closure semantics don't come into it.) | 15:20 | ||
15:22
vaisian left
|
|||
ugexe | m: role Foo { }; class Bar is Foo { }; say Bar.new.^roles # does a role inherited instead of composed get punned first? | 15:25 | |
camelia | rakudo-moar e071e4: OUTPUT«((Foo))» | ||
15:29
lizmat left
15:30
El_Che left
|
|||
ugexe | looks like it composes the role into a new class which gets inherited, hence the role still showing up | 15:32 | |
15:37
woolfy left
15:39
huggable left
15:40
huggable joined
15:43
brrt left
|
|||
buharin__ | perl is full of magic ;s | 15:50 | |
15:51
V_S_C joined
|
|||
DrForr_ | Yep. And sometimes it even works :) | 15:52 | |
15:52
V_S_C left
15:53
wamba left
15:54
wamba joined
16:06
Zoffix left
|
|||
nine | ugexe: I'm not sure it's worth worrying about subclasses of Distribution. Can't imagine anyone writing one. | 16:08 | |
mst | nine: whichprobably means I'll do it one day, but I haven't yet so | 16:11 | |
16:16
TakinOver left
16:18
TakinOver joined
|
|||
nine | mst: but when you do it will be the new role Distribution, not the quite useless class we're replacing ;) | 16:19 | |
16:24
kurahaupo left
16:26
araujo joined
16:27
araujo left,
araujo joined
16:33
vendethiel- left
16:34
tbrowder joined
16:36
tbrowder left
16:54
setty1 joined
16:57
silug left
16:59
Penguiniator joined
17:09
silug joined
17:15
Zoffix joined
|
|||
Zoffix | m: say GLOBAL::.WHAT; say GLOBAL:: === Stash | 17:16 | |
camelia | rakudo-moar e071e4: OUTPUT«(Stash)False» | ||
Zoffix | How come it's False? | ||
Oh, nm | |||
hankache | m: say GLOBAL::.WHAT; say GLOBAL:: ~~ Stash | 17:18 | |
camelia | rakudo-moar e071e4: OUTPUT«(Stash)True» | ||
17:18
lambd0x joined
|
|||
psch | m: say GLOBAL::.WHAT; say GLOBAL::.WHAT === Stash | 17:23 | |
camelia | rakudo-moar e071e4: OUTPUT«(Stash)True» | ||
17:29
lambd0x left
|
|||
kalkin-_ | Ǐs there a real life example of some Perl 6 library, which is thoroughly documented via POD? | 17:31 | |
I would also see how the different semantic block are used in real life | 17:32 | ||
17:32
kalkin-_ is now known as kalkin-
|
|||
Zoffix | kalkin-, S26 speculation uses P6 pod: raw.githubusercontent.com/perl6/sp...tation.pod | 17:36 | |
I don't think 100% of that stuff is supported tho | |||
17:46
jjido joined
|
|||
kalkin- | Zoffix: I know about S26 and i'm reading it, but I want to see it actually used in a software project | 17:46 | |
jdv79 | Zoffix: nice blog on the hijacking | 17:47 | |
Zoffix | Thanks. | ||
jdv79 | i wonder if there will eventually be tools/techniques for eco system trust to mitigate that sort of stuff | ||
kalkin- | lol, I just wondered, why I am i reading S26 in source code? I can just download it and run p6doc on it. | 17:50 | |
nop it doesn't work :) | |||
Zoffix | kalkin-, based on a naive grep, these files should have some amount of POD in them: gist.github.com/zoffixznet/57b5b7e...19bae73fcb | 17:54 | |
kalkin- | Zoffix thanks! | ||
Hmm now do i use =TITLE or =NAME? App::Mi6 auto generates =head1 NAME i think, but what is the semantic difference between a title and a name? Would title be used if you are writing a book/essay in POD? | 17:56 | ||
kalkin- just saw that Terminal::Print uses title instead of name | 17:57 | ||
18:07
hankache left,
hankache_ joined
18:14
hankache_ left
18:16
pmurias joined,
jjido left,
jmark joined
|
|||
pmurias | hahainternet: re restricted language, the fact that templates are turning complete doesn't reduce the amount of type stuff that can be determined at compile time | 18:17 | |
hahainternet: in fact it increases it | |||
hahainternet | pmurias: true that's an orthogonal issue, but i hope i made myself clear, i'm still learning anyhow | 18:19 | |
18:21
jjido joined
18:26
espadrine left
18:29
skids joined
18:32
kerframil joined
18:39
zakharyas left,
pmurias left
18:40
pmurias joined
|
|||
ugexe | nine: Zef subclasses Distribution | 18:43 | |
But again, i'm all for breaking it instead of adding work arounds in rakudo | 18:47 | ||
18:47
ssotka joined
|
|||
ugexe | you just cant say that enough code uses Distribution.new to warrant a shim but not enough subclasses it to warrant such | 18:48 | |
18:55
jjido left
19:01
domidumont left,
CIAvash left
19:02
jjido joined
19:05
zakharyas joined
|
|||
dalek | c: 0e6c0cd | (Jan-Olof Hendig)++ | doc/Type/Pair.pod: Added docs for Pair.Str |
19:07 | |
19:10
zakharyas left
19:11
spider-mario joined
19:12
zakharyas joined
19:25
wamba left
19:26
girafe joined,
wamba joined
19:29
Zoffix left
|
|||
dalek | c: d9c25c6 | (Jan-Olof Hendig)++ | doc/Type/Map.pod: Fixed two typos |
19:35 | |
c: eb698aa | (Jan-Olof Hendig)++ | doc/Type/Pair.pod: Added docs for Pair.pairs |
|||
19:38
freezerburnV joined
19:39
huggable left,
jjido left
19:42
girafe left
19:43
freezerburnV left,
girafe joined
19:46
zacts left
19:47
zacts joined
19:52
jjido joined
|
|||
dalek | c: 8ab2db7 | (Wenzel P. P. Peppmeyer)++ | doc/Type/Num.pod: tell why NaN values are produced |
19:56 | |
19:57
freezerburnV joined
|
|||
dalek | c: df8a150 | (Jan-Olof Hendig)++ | doc/Type/Pair.pod: Revert "Added docs for Pair.pairs". Method was already documented. This reverts commit eb698aa3593979838f7b7e9c84f81508b07f5983. |
20:02 | |
dogbert17 | sigh | ||
20:07
lichtkind_ joined
20:09
pmurias left
20:11
lichtkind__ left
20:16
raiph left
20:17
raiph joined,
FROGGS left
20:18
jmark left
20:20
raiph left
20:21
raiph joined
20:22
raiph left,
raiph joined
20:24
raiph left
20:25
raiph joined
20:26
grondilu left
20:29
kaare_ left
20:32
kid511 joined
20:33
kid51 left
|
|||
zacts | How much does the Perl6 language rely on Rakudo? Like would it be theoretically possible to implement it on another interpreter? | 20:34 | |
or at this point does it rely on rakudo specific features? | |||
(like a hypothetical jvm based Perl6 for example) | 20:35 | ||
(just curious as to how Perl6 is all put together) | |||
(NOT that I like JVM) | |||
kalkin- | zacts: afaik you can run perl6 on jvm already | ||
you can use moarvm or jvm | |||
zacts | ah nice! :-) | ||
oh cool | |||
that sounds cool | 20:36 | ||
20:36
Gruber is now known as Grrrr
20:37
raiph left,
raiph joined
|
|||
geekosaur | well, in theory you can. the jvm backend is a bit broken currently. historically there were two non-rakudo implementations, but both are bitrotted now (niecza in c# / clr, pugs in haskell) | 20:38 | |
there's a javascript backend in development, I gather | |||
kalkin- | I ended up reading jnthn's Audio-Hydrogen. It has some nice examples how to use POD to document just a simple class | ||
This is pretty helpful | |||
20:41
zakharyas left
|
|||
kalkin- | Also should i use use v6 or use v6.c? | 20:46 | |
I mean I understand that 6 will also match 6.c and 6.d and so on.. But why do people specify in a—for me normal looking perl6—file 6c? | 20:47 | ||
gfldex | there may be some deprications with v6.d (relative to v6.c) | 20:48 | |
mst | kalkin-: because that allows 6.d to change things if it needs to without breaking their code. | ||
kalkin- | mst: no i get that, but we don't even know if 6.d will break anything, do we? Are there already plans? | 20:49 | |
20:49
kid51 joined
|
|||
zacts | geekosaur: oh nice | 20:49 | |
mst | kalkin-: I, personally, would use 6.c and then after 6.d comes out, edit the line and re-run my tests | ||
zacts | A Javascript backend sounds nice | ||
kalkin- | or is it just being careful? May be it's the better way to specify 6.c? | ||
20:50
kid511 left
|
|||
kalkin- | AFAIK if i have a file using 6c but have 6d perl6 implementation, it still will run, but in 6c mode, so most of the authors will have no pressure migrating | 20:50 | |
or even changing this line | 20:51 | ||
but may be this is ok | |||
gfldex | we do have some changes in v6 that are not part of v6.c (like the .cow lizmat++ added 2 days ago). Technically, rakudo should complain when you use .cow and v6.c together. | 20:52 | |
m: use v6.c; my @a = <a b c>; my @b = @a.cow; | 20:53 | ||
camelia | ( no output ) | ||
kalkin- | m: use v6.c; my @a = <a b c>; sau @a.cow.WHY | 20:54 | |
camelia | rakudo-moar e071e4: OUTPUT«5===SORRY!5=== Error while compiling <tmp>Undeclared routine: sau used at line 1. Did you mean 'say'?» | ||
kalkin- | m: use v6.c; my @a = <a b c>; say @a.cow.WHY | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar e071e4: OUTPUT«(Any)» | ||
gfldex | someone would have to implement that but someone isn't here right now :) | ||
20:55
raiph left
|
|||
kalkin- | Also should i add the #= comments, to my methods so .WHY will returns something meaningful? I read about it in S26, but is this used at all? | 20:55 | |
kalkin- is really missing best practices documentation on like _everything_ in perl6 | 20:56 | ||
gfldex | for now there is no software that is using #= comments. If you would implement an editor in perl 6, you could benefit from it. | ||
the problem with best practices is that we don't know what that is yet. | 20:57 | ||
i personally would have exactly one entry for that list so far | |||
20:57
lambd0x joined
|
|||
gfldex | m: sub f(Int:D $i) { say $i }; # most of the time you actually want :D | 20:58 | |
camelia | ( no output ) | ||
gfldex | m: use variables :D; my Int $i; | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar e071e4: OUTPUT«5===SORRY!5=== Error while compiling <tmp>Variable definition of type Int:D (implicit :D by pragma) requires an initializerat <tmp>:1------> 3use variables :D; my Int $i7⏏5; expecting any of: constraint» | ||
gfldex | what reminds me of ... | 20:59 | |
kalkin- | Ohh the :D smiley. Is this a good practice to add it every where where i expect some defined value? | ||
In most methods i expect to have some defined value, am I not? So I probably should put it almost everywhere, shouldn't i? | 21:00 | ||
gfldex | if you use it you will get the error message on the sub call. So you don't have to trace it back by hand. | 21:02 | |
also, you provide the compiler with more wood to chew on. | |||
m: use variables :D; { use variables :_; my Int $i; } | 21:04 | ||
camelia | ( no output ) | ||
kalkin- | gfldex: ok, so it's a good idea to use it. | 21:05 | |
gfldex | it depends a bit on contect ofc. There can be very good reasons to allow undefined values. | 21:06 | |
also note that float point numbers are special | |||
m: say NaN.Bool, NaN.defined; | |||
camelia | rakudo-moar e071e4: OUTPUT«TrueTrue» | ||
21:07
buharin__ left
|
|||
dalek | c: ae5836b | (Wenzel P. P. Peppmeyer)++ | doc/Language/variables.pod: doc use variables :D |
21:07 | |
21:16
freezerburnV left
21:17
jjido left
21:18
Zoffix joined
|
|||
Zoffix | zacts, a JVM backend would still be using Rakudo. Rakudo is the compiler, JVM is one of the VMs it generates code for. The other being MoarVM. | 21:21 | |
zacts | oh I see | ||
21:22
jjido joined
|
|||
skids | There have been other compilers in the past, most notably neicza which had .NET as a target. | 21:25 | |
21:25
girafe left
|
|||
timotimo | we're defining the language perl6 based on the test suite, not on the implementation | 21:25 | |
anything that passes the test suite sufficiently is perl6 | |||
so it doesn't have to be rakudo or rakudo based | |||
21:26
sdo joined
|
|||
sdo | hello | 21:27 | |
gfldex | m: say "ohai sdo!" | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar e071e4: OUTPUT«ohai sdo!» | ||
kalkin- | gfldex: ic. thanks for the hint with floating numbers | 21:29 | |
sdo | I did stupid thing this afternoon I was cleaning my repo and unsubscribe by mistake to perl6 repository. I had a pull requeston it but what should I have to give to register again please? | 21:30 | |
on github | 21:32 | ||
21:32
setty1 left
21:33
tbrowder joined
|
|||
sdo | hello :pmichaud | 21:34 | |
parabolize | sdo: github says you just need to be mentioned. help.github.com/articles/unsubscri...ersations/ | 21:35 | |
21:38
molaf left
|
|||
sdo | parabolize: I had a green button says unsubscribe how to get it back? | 21:40 | |
21:43
TEttinger joined
|
|||
parabolize | sdo: help.github.com/articles/watching-repositories/ help.github.com/articles/subscribi...ersations/ | 21:44 | |
21:45
Zoffix left
21:51
Upasaka joined
|
|||
xdg | hi. Could someone please explain the difference between a constant and a sigil-less variable? I'm interested in both implementation differences and practical use differences, if any. | 21:51 | |
Next Q, given that $ variables can have arrays/hashes assigned to them and pass through subscripting, is there any difference between Q<$x=[1,2,3]> and Q<@x=1,2,3> other than flattening behavior? | 21:54 | ||
21:55
bt_ joined
|
|||
gfldex | @-sigils are handled differently in string interpolation and in signatures | 21:55 | |
m: constant c = Array.new; my \s = Array.new; say c.VAR, s.VAR; c[1] = 11; s[1] = 11; | 21:57 | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar e071e4: OUTPUT«[][]» | ||
21:59
bt_ left
|
|||
xdg | gfldex, that implies no difference between constants and sigil-less, yes? | 21:59 | |
gfldex | looks like it | 22:00 | |
however, constant initialisers will be executed at compile time | |||
xdg | and the interpolation is just that qq<@foo> doesn't interpolate? | 22:01 | |
gfldex | you can tell the Q what to interpolate and there are different flags for $ and @ | 22:02 | |
xdg | I'm finding a number of things in perl6 look different but work the same and I'm trying to both confirm that, and also find a way to explain concisely why one would want to use one or the other | ||
gfldex | that compile time thing on constant is a huge difference | ||
m: constant a = BEGIN some-function(now); \a = some-function(now) | 22:03 | ||
camelia | rakudo-moar e071e4: OUTPUT«5===SORRY!5=== Error while compiling <tmp>Undeclared routine: some-function used at line 1» | ||
gfldex | what the value of a will heavily depends on some-function | 22:04 | |
actually BEGIN is likely the wrong phaser, it's a bit late | |||
22:06
jjido left
22:07
Penguiniator left
|
|||
Xliff_zzzz | does anyone know where the ::() operation is documented? | 22:09 | |
22:09
Xliff_zzzz is now known as Xliff
22:10
sdo left
|
|||
gfldex | Xliff: doc.perl6.org/language/packages#In...into_names | 22:10 | |
Xliff | gfldex++ # Thanks | 22:11 | |
22:13
_28_ria left
22:15
RabidGravy left,
raiph joined
22:17
_28_ria joined
22:19
cdg joined,
spider-mario left
22:30
raiph left,
jjido joined
22:32
raiph joined
22:35
jjido left
|
|||
dalek | c: 44fa2cc | (Wenzel P. P. Peppmeyer)++ | doc/Language/packages.pod: add ::() to index |
22:37 | |
c: 0cc68d2 | (Wenzel P. P. Peppmeyer)++ | doc/Language/terms.pod: add constant to index |
22:38 | ||
22:40
firstdayonthejob left
22:45
lichtkind_ left,
lambd0x left
22:47
rindolf left
22:49
_dolmen_ joined
22:51
bjz left
23:03
_dolmen_ left
23:05
kurahaupo joined
23:07
abruanese left
23:10
bjz joined,
sufrostico joined
23:17
abruanese joined
23:20
sufrostico left
23:23
bjz left
23:40
huggable joined
|