freespectrum.herokuapp.com/workshop...-links.svg -- gist.github.com/masak/5431185 -- logs at olive.undo.it/log?channel=masakism
Set by moderator on 7 June 2013.
timotimo masak: may i ask you to look over my cod 00:05
my code? :)
r: gist.github.com/timo/5819240 00:06
camelia rakudo b2072f: OUTPUT«I bought a B of As from T S.␤{"pattern" => "A", "replacement" => "apple", "terminal" => Bool::False}␤{"pattern" => "B", "replacement" => "bag", "terminal" => Bool::False}␤{"pattern" => "S", "replacement" => "shop", "terminal" => Bool::False}␤{"pattern" => "T", "rep…
timotimo maybe it'll be enough to replace the <.ws> with ' '* 00:07
hm, i think now i'm matching whitespace where i shouldn't 00:10
er. not matching whitespace where i should, actually
aaand i made it work :)
now to make it clever and beautiful 00:12
r: say 1, 2, 3, 4, { @_.pick } ... { * != * }; 00:14
camelia rakudo b2072f: OUTPUT«1␤»
timotimo r: say 1, 2, 3, 4, { @_.pick } ... { * == * };
camelia rakudo b2072f: OUTPUT«1␤»
timotimo r: say 1, 2, 3, 4 ... { * == * };
camelia rakudo b2072f: OUTPUT«1␤»
timotimo r: say 1, 2, 3, 4 ... { $^a == $^b };
camelia rakudo b2072f: OUTPUT«Not enough positional parameters passed; got 1 but expected 2␤ in block at /tmp/vd1lKx_irq:1␤␤»
timotimo oh? i can't have an ending block that gets more than one value passed?
that's kind of a bummer :(
masak kinds of comes back to the conversation 00:22
timotimo at the gist link from above you'll find the current, working version
masak oh, seems most problems resolved themselves :)
timotimo indeed, .ws was the source of all of my troubles ;)
masak .oO( in whitespace, no-one can hear you scream ) 00:35
00:38 benabik joined
masak nice solution. timotimo++ 00:50
bedtime. 'night
01:45 BenGoldberg joined 02:19 benabik left 03:49 dmol joined
Teratogen hello 04:04
labster hello Teratogen 04:22
Teratogen I missed masakism! 04:23
darn it!
labster I was going to work on my PROMISE and HEX problems a little bit more, but I got distracted by breaking rakudo on windows right before the release date :/
We won't have full attention, but you should be able to jump in and do the work. Of course, it's better when masak is awake 04:24
You can take a look here: github.com/masak/workshop 04:25
Teratogen I am not a Perl 6 person =/ 04:39
labster That's okay. This is a Perl 5 and 6 workshop. 04:40
You can do either one you want to do. 04:42
Most of the tests are written in P5, so it's probably easier to do it in 5. 04:43
06:31 dmol joined 09:11 snearch joined
masak oh hai #masakism 10:44
I'm awake :)
yes, it's rather fun how the workshop doesn't "take sides" between Perl 5 and Perl 6. it just uses one or the other whenever convenient.
and doesn't make such a big deal out of it.
I'm usually quite aware of all the differences between the two languages, but when producing the workshop it didn't feel like they were that far apart. 10:45
* benabik is also amused that he can use the p5 tests with not much more than s/->/./g 10:46
heh -- that's because long before we started going on about "sister languages", we actually considered Perl 5 and Perl 6 to be *the same language*. :) 10:47
lizmat fwiw, I still consider Perl 1,2,3,4,5,6 to be all Perl 10:59
:-)
masak so does TimToady, I believe. 11:02
as someone who was there when the "sister languages" meme got forged, I know it's there mostly for diplomatic reasons. 11:03
it wouldn't have been needed at all in a perfect world where Perl 6 was developed in three years flat, and superseded all Perl 5 installs across the world.
lizmat like the other meme, in time it will die 11:08
.oO{does that qualify as an autpun?}
*autopun
masak no, don't think so :) 11:09
lizmat as it requires knowledge about the other Perl meme?
masak oh, that one. 11:16
still doesn't quite connect for me as an autopun. just mentioning the same thing twice isn't really enough.
this is an autopun: twitter.com/ditchkelly/status/3239...3091407872 :)
lizmat ;-) 11:19
timotimo masak: refering to gist.github.com/timo/5819240 ; do you have a suggestion for something nicer-looking than the nested $beginning and $prev comparison stuff? 12:08
12:16 lizmat joined
masak looks 12:32
timotimo i was hoping i could use the sequence operator, but the end-point closure would need to take two arguments for it to actually look nice 12:34
masak timotimo: I think you could get rid of beginning by doing 'ENTER $value'. 12:40
but it seems that doesn't work right now. 12:41
bringing the issue over to #perl6.
timotimo does "seems not to work" mean you tested it?
masak yes, of course. this is #masakism :) 12:42
timotimo :3 12:48
masak FROGGS++ found rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=116102 which is why this doesn't work yet. 12:50
seemingly that ticket made the spec clarify that ENTER does leave a value at all.
hm. or not. 12:51
timotimo i kind of remember digging into that 12:56
16:31 GlitchMr joined 16:54 dmol joined
masak I like the fact that there's 26 people in here (and 2 bots) despite the fact that this channel may never again be host to any significant activity whatsoever :) 17:21
then again, maybe there is room for a third workshop...
timotimo maybe :) 17:25
gist.github.com/timo/5819240/revisions ← masak, this is a version I feel confident uploading to rosettacode now; i think it's very pretty now 17:26
maybe i'll do :$verbose = any(@*ARGS) eq "--verbose", though 17:27
yeah, that sounds like a good addition
that doesn't seem to work o_O 17:29
does MAIN clear out the $*ARGS or something?
masak looks 17:30
timotimo: I'm wondering if 'rule' shouldn't be a rather than a token. then you could make the <.ws> calls implicit. 17:32
timotimo is there a way then to "unspace" the spot between terminal rule and replacement string? 17:33
masak yes. just put them together without whitespace in between. 17:35
timotimo i was hoping i could have whitespace in the definition that won't invoke .ws, but that's okay 17:36
masak it feels slightly inelegant (at lines 40..41) to slurp in all the data, and then only loop through things one-by-one. 17:37
I mean, it's nice uses of >> and Z but it ends up wasting memory for no real benefit. 17:38
I think I'd've done 'for 1..5 -> $n' instead, to be honest ;)
timotimo mhm
masak an extra reason for that: 17:39
that's the logic you have in your other two MAIN routines *anyway*.
so you can probably unify things a bit more and not repeat code there.
timotimo i could defer to the other main subs, yeah
and then i could even use dir to find all rule* that have test* files 17:40
masak or factor out what's there into yet another subroutine.
but yes.
beyond that, it looks very nice. timotimo++
timotimo thanks! :) 17:41
my $start_value = (try $testfile.IO.slurp.trim-trailing) // prompt("please give a start value: "); # this is pretty cool. 17:49
masak najs :)
timotimo replacing .IO.slurp with .&slurp, yey or nay? 17:50
masak slurp($testfile).trim-trailing, maybe?
timotimo mhm
okay, i've updated the gist and i'll upload it to RC now :D 17:53
masak \\o/ 17:55
timotimo++
timotimo that was a fun task 17:57
masak :)
18:25 spider-mario joined 19:53 dmol joined 20:31 moritz left 22:02 dagurval joined 22:38 BenGoldberg joined 23:28 KvH_ joined 23:35 dagurval joined 23:36 census joined, census left

Powered by Cro and the Raku® Programming Language.

Please report any issues / comments / feature requests as an issue on App::Raku::Log.

Thank you!