| dalek | ast: ab7d758 | (David Warring)++ | S10-packages/precompilation.t: fix erroneous precomp failure for RT#123276 |
00:30 | |
| synopsebot6 | Link: rt.perl.org/rt3//Public/Bug/Displa...?id=123276 | ||
|
01:00
lizmat joined
01:01
stmuk_ joined
01:21
stmuk joined
01:26
stmuk_ joined
01:36
AlexDaniel joined
01:37
stmuk joined
02:10
stmuk_ joined
02:17
stmuk joined
02:21
stmuk_ joined
05:34
vendethiel joined
|
|||
| [Tux] | test 25.500 | 06:28 | |
| test-t 14.556 | |||
| csv-parser 26.435 | |||
| This is Rakudo version 2016.03-116-gd1eeb38 built on MoarVM version 2016.03-104-g10d3971 | |||
| no idea why it is still at 104 | |||
|
06:56
geekosaur joined
08:25
RabidGravy joined
09:32
vendethiel- joined
10:54
vendethiel joined
12:21
brrt joined
|
|||
| dalek | p: f12f8e1 | (Pawel Murias)++ | src/ (4 files): [js] Add a --substagestats option to time the subparts of turning QAST into js. |
13:16 | |
| p: 19f1a0a | (Pawel Murias)++ | src/vm/js/nqp-runtime/io.js: [js] Increase the buffer size of readallfh, speeding up slurp() of large files a GIGANTIC amount. |
|||
| |Tux| | So, under rakudobrew I have git_reference/MoarVM ( tux.nl/Files/20160412160631.png ) and moar-nom ( tux.nl/Files/20160412160820.png ) | 14:08 | |
| to *me* is is completely unclear how these two relate, and I would love to know why I cannot "see" timotimo's last updates to the first in the second | 14:09 | ||
| timotimo | i'd assume git_reference is only there to make clones faster by not having to download it off the internets again | ||
| [Coke] | RT: 1277; SEGV: 26; JVM: 60; LTA: 130; PERF: 12 | 15:30 | |
| NYI: 88 # we should probably verify that we're still planning on doing these NYIs. | 16:07 | ||
| (e.g. cat, KeyExtractor, complex) | 16:08 | ||
| psch | something i'm wondering is the lack of CLA on roast | 16:55 | |
| considering that's the official specification and rakudo is just one implementation it feels weird that the former has to be covered with a CLA but the latter doesn't | 16:56 | ||
| afaiu, the CLA serves to establish ownership of TPF over the code, which with roast be official would make more sense there to me | |||
| s/be/being/ | 16:57 | ||
| as it stands, this to me seems like rakudo is TPF-supported, but roast isn't | 16:58 | ||
| [Coke] | it's not about financial support. | 16:59 | |
| psch | oh, so because rakudo might have grants associated it gets the CLA treatment? | 17:00 | |
| [Coke] | no. | ||
| it's not about money. | |||
| psch | ...i don't get it. i don't think i implied it could be about money in general | 17:01 | |
| [Coke] | as I understand it, it was for legal protection in case of a suit. | ||
| "support". what other kind of support? | |||
| psch | so it's that roast isn't liable to be used for faulty, monetary products? | ||
| 'cause it doesn't do anything that business could use | 17:02 | ||
| ...this might too far into lawyer-stuff for me to actually make sense of anyway :) | 17:03 | ||
| yeah, i've reread the CLA and apparently i'm completely clueless what exactly it is i signed there :P | 17:04 | ||
| perlpilot | psch: you signed a document that says that there is no one who other than you who may claim to your contributions and that you give your contributions to TPF (or something like that) | 17:40 | |
| (at least that's how I remember it) | |||
| Though, I'm still not sure how this is "legal protection" really. Sure, it protects the project from legal recourse when someone *does* have a claim on contributed code, but if their claim stands, we still have to rip it out and recreate that part. | 17:42 | ||
| teatime | it might help a little bit if a large contributor decided to quibble about the terms under which they licensed their code to perl / got mad and tried to make you rip out all of their contributions | 17:43 | |
| but it doesn't seem to be super valuable, from my quick read | 17:44 | ||
| psch | i'm really not legalese-savvy in any capacity | ||
| an agreement paraphrasable as "i bring these toys, they are mine, but because they are digital (and thus duplicable) you can keep your copy" seems fine to me vOv | 17:45 | ||
| i do realise that i'm not the primary entity which has to be fine with the CLA, though, but i trust that TPF has competent enough lawyers to make it useful enough for their purposes | 17:46 | ||
| [Coke] | If you ever meet Allison Randal at a perl conference, ask her. :) | 18:19 | |
| perlpilot | Does Allison still go to Perl conferences? | 18:20 | |
| [Coke] | no clue! | 19:17 | |
| she did the last time I saw her, perhaps for obvious reasons. :) | |||
|
19:19
AlexDaniel joined
|
|||
| teatime | can someone sanity check my units (Dur means Duration): Dur ÷ Dur → Real, Dur ÷ Real → Dur, Dur % Dur → remainder in seconds, Dur % Real → remainder in seconds | 19:49 | |
| perlpilot | teatime: are not your "remainders in seconds" actually Durations? | 20:11 | |
| teatime | yes, they are Durations | 20:12 | |
| I just said it that way to make it clear they were the remainder | |||
| but they're durations, since they're in seconds | |||
| perlpilot | then it all seems fine to me | ||
| teatime | cool, ty | 20:13 | |
|
21:02
hankache joined
22:59
vendethiel- joined
23:25
sortiz joined
|
|||
