|
Parrot 0.8.1 "Tio Richie" Released | parrot.org | 24 TT | 648 RT Set by moderator on 10 December 2008. |
|||
| dalek | r33997 | particle++ | trunk: | 00:00 | |
| : [RELEASE] PLATFORMS updates for strawberry and msvc -- all tests successful | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=33997 | |||
| jonathan | purl, november? | ||
| purl | i guess november is at www.november-wiki.org/ or use.perl.org/~masak/journal/37212 | ||
| Whiteknight | okay, do we have any more commits or updates outstanding? | ||
| jonathan | Oh! I get I know what's wrong... | 00:01 | |
| chromatic | I have a quick PDD edit, and I'm trying to fix the Darwin segfault. | 00:02 | |
| Whiteknight | okay, I'll wait till after Simpsons | ||
| eric256 | night all | 00:03 | |
|
00:03
eric256 left
|
|||
| lathos | No DBDI in November yet then? | 00:03 | |
| dalek | r33998 | chromatic++ | trunk: | 00:06 | |
| : [PDD] Updated link to IBM's decimal arithmetic library (thanks to Geraud for | |||
| : finding its new location). | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=33998 | |||
| chromatic | Ha, that page links to our PDD. | ||
| Whiteknight | I wonder if the book should even mention the wonders of our Asynchronous IO system if we're not even planning to have it until 2.0 | 00:08 | |
| jonathan | moritz: Still about? | ||
|
00:09
AndyA joined
|
|||
| Whiteknight | okay...now anybody have any changes to commit? | 00:11 | |
| dalek | r33999 | tewk++ | trunk: | 00:12 | |
| : [js] NEWS | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=33999 | |||
| chromatic | Still working on that segfault. | ||
| Whiteknight | ...answers my question | ||
| chromatic | Will update news. | ||
| ... and can't reproduce the segfault on Linux. | |||
| dalek | r34000 | chromatic++ | trunk: | 00:22 | |
| : [distro] Updated NEWS. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34000 | |||
| chromatic | We'll call this good for now. | 00:24 | |
| I'm set. | |||
| dalek | r34001 | chromatic++ | trunk: | 00:25 | |
| : [t] Marked RT #60926 known-failing IMCC macro test as TODO on Darwin platforms. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34001 | |||
| r34002 | jonathan++ | rakudoreg: | 00:27 | ||
| : [rakudo] This patch is an attempt to fix the issue with November; expect I'll back this out and do it a better way if it does fix it. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34002 | |||
| Whiteknight | okay, any other stoppers? | 00:28 | |
|
00:28
leto joined
|
|||
| chromatic | I'm good. | 00:29 | |
| particle | +1 | ||
| purl | 1 | ||
| Whiteknight | IT HAS BEGUN! | 00:32 | |
| dalek | r34003 | Whiteknight++ | RELEASE_0_8_2: | ||
| : Starting release 0.8.2 | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34003 | |||
| Tene | Quick, break the build! | ||
| Whiteknight | neener neener, I've already got the branch set up | 00:33 | |
|
00:35
idemal joined
|
|||
| Tene | I can commit to a branch. | 00:36 | |
| cotto | +1 | ||
| purl | 1 | ||
| jonathan handcuffs Tene | |||
| Tene types with his toes. | |||
| cotto | tene++ | ||
| Tene | Okay, the next big thing I need to remember to work on is preventing exceptions thrown from an exception handler from being caught by that handler. | 00:38 | |
| I'm pretty sure I know how ot do it, too. | |||
| but, maybe when I get home. | |||
| chromatic | That should fix some things. | 00:40 | |
| cotto | and now to fix 6 Coverity defects with one swell foop... | 00:43 | |
| dalek | r34004 | cotto++ | trunk: | 00:44 | |
| : [imcc] removed unused (and probably buggy) multi_keyed function | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34004 | |||
| pmichaud | hello all | 00:47 | |
| purl | It's a crazy world, but hello to you too! | ||
| jonathan | w/b pm | 00:50 | |
| Whiteknight is getting cramps in his fingers | 00:58 | ||
| GeJ | moritz: still here? | 01:01 | |
| purl | rumour has it here is just defining a default value. It's just parameter syntax, but types, not variables | ||
| Whiteknight | purl forget here | 01:09 | |
| purl | Whiteknight, I didn't have anything matching here | ||
| Whiteknight | here? | ||
| still here? | |||
| here?? | 01:10 | ||
| ...stupid bo... | |||
| or bot | |||
| pmichaud | someone might've removed it via /msg | 01:11 | |
|
01:11
idemal joined
|
|||
| TiMBuS | is there a pasttype that checks if a pmc is null? | 01:13 | |
| jonathan | no, but there may be a :pirop | ||
| TiMBuS | ill take a look at the pirop list then | 01:14 | |
| jonathan | ifnull I think is the op name. | ||
| pmichaud | isnull | ||
| ifnull is "branch if null" | |||
| jonathan | Ah, yes. | ||
| TiMBuS | oh ok, thanks :> | 01:15 | |
| pmichaud | :pirop('isnull') works. | ||
| TiMBuS | i figured it was about time i had a better error message than 'null pmc access in name()' | 01:16 | |
| pmichaud | yeah, change it to "General Protection Fault" | ||
| jonathan | No, no, it's called an Illegal Operation now! ;-) | 01:18 | |
| TiMBuS | i was thinking something even more ambiguous, like 'something went wrong' :p | ||
| pmichaud | "boom" | ||
| TiMBuS | haha | ||
| pmichaud | "oops occured in name()" | ||
| TiMBuS | an ascii version of the mac error bomb | ||
| pmichaud | "parrot had a boo-boo" | 01:19 | |
| dalek | r34005 | Whiteknight++ | RELEASE_0_8_2: | 01:32 | |
| : Updating things for release | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34005 | |||
|
01:37
yjh joined
|
|||
| GeJ | no mention of the SQLite binding? | 01:38 | |
| GeJ re-reads | |||
| lathos | I'm currently playing with it a bit in my private repository, so I'm happy for it not to be announced quite yet. | 01:40 | |
| GeJ | oh, ok. | 01:41 | |
| lathos | I'd like to see another set of bindings there (a) so it's really DBDI and not SQLite, and (b) to check that things are abstracted correctly. | ||
| Also I'm not sure whether or not to rewrite it using NCI.pm | 01:43 | ||
|
01:43
Limbic_Region joined
|
|||
| Whiteknight | make fulltest takes forever! | 02:02 | |
| chromatic | Not if you have an infinite number of parallel universes. | ||
| Whiteknight | hold on, I might have them in the closet | ||
| ...nope | |||
| jonathan | chromatic: Aren't we making assumptions about countability of infinities here? | ||
| lathos | Can you use EC2 as a simulation? | ||
| chromatic | You don't have to count them, just dispatch to them. | 02:03 | |
| Whiteknight | on the bright side, it's a really simple dispatch algorithm | 02:04 | |
| ...if you have lazy lists anyway | 02:05 | ||
|
02:05
tetragon joined
|
|||
| lathos | "It also assumes that destroying the universe is O(n) in operation." | 02:08 | |
| dalek | r34006 | Whiteknight++ | RELEASE_0_8_2: | 02:09 | |
| : release 0.8.2 | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34006 | |||
| Whiteknight | chromatic, you still here? | 02:10 | |
| chromatic | Yes. | 02:11 | |
| Whiteknight | can you upload the tarball to cpan? | ||
| chromatic | Sure. Have a URL? | ||
| Whiteknight | no, email? | 02:12 | |
| lathos | Whiteknight++ | ||
| chromatic | Email's likely very slow. | ||
| Did you do the FTP upload to parrot.org? | |||
| Whiteknight | oh no, I missed that step | 02:13 | |
| Whiteknight is a doofus | |||
| back in a bit! | |||
| chromatic | It's a new step. | ||
|
02:13
MariachiElf joined
02:14
LimbicRegion joined
|
|||
| Whiteknight | how do I do it? I can't find it in the release guide? | 02:14 | |
| jonathan | In that case you're not a ddoofus... :-) | 02:15 | |
| Whiteknight | you say that as if being a doofus is a bad thing | ||
| chromatic | It's under 8.b. | 02:16 | |
|
02:16
LR joined
|
|||
| Whiteknight | haha, my print out is old | 02:17 | |
| urg, I don't have a login at ftp-osl.osuosl.org | 02:20 | ||
| chromatic | particle, ping | ||
| Whiteknight hates ssh | |||
| pmichaud | particle @ seattle.pm | 02:23 | |
| lathos | Yay Christmas parrot | 02:42 | |
| moderator | Parrot 0.8.2 Feliz Loro Released | parrot.org | 45 TT | 538 RT | 02:45 | |
| Whiteknight | urg, perlfoundation wiki appears to be down | 02:48 | |
| or, it's giving an error for me | |||
| my trac password isn't working | 02:58 | ||
| ENOLOGIN | 03:01 | ||
| okay, that part of the checklist just isn't getting done tonight | 03:05 | ||
|
03:06
particle1 joined
|
|||
| particle1 | ESOMEONEBOTHEREDME | 03:06 | |
| chromatic | EFGHIJKLMNOP | ||
| particle1 | WHAT!?!?! i'm righting a lightning talk. it got drunk and fell over. | ||
| Whiteknight | particle, I need to upload the greaseball to the ftp doodad, and the trac thingy is borked | 03:07 | |
| after you're done righting it, you could write it perhaps | |||
| :) | 03:08 | ||
| particle1 | ok, it's sftp | 03:10 | |
|
03:11
kid51 joined
|
|||
| particle1 | ...and it doesn't like my password(s) | 03:12 | |
| argh. somebody wake the allison. | |||
| chromatic | ENOALLISON | 03:13 | |
| Whiteknight | where does she live? | ||
| particle1 | she's somewhere on the left coast | ||
| chromatic | In theory. | 03:14 | |
| purl | in theory is probably my pants or it's too dark to read or somewhat intrusive to David Wheeler or RAILS DEFECTOR! BREAK OUT THE SANDY LUBE! | ||
| Whiteknight | left coast and already asleep? Isn't it about 7 over there? | ||
| particle1 | i don't think i can get a hold of lance or the other osuosl folks atm | ||
| Whiteknight | so it's all on hold till tomorrow. w0t | ||
| or w00t | |||
| particle1 | is it headed to cpan? | 03:15 | |
|
03:15
tetragon joined
|
|||
| chromatic | It needs a URL first. | 03:15 | |
| Whiteknight | Well, I'm heading to bed now. I will try things again in the early morning | 03:16 | |
| particle1 | Whiteknight++ | 03:17 | |
| Whiteknight | thanks! Goodnight gentlement | ||
| ETOOPIDFINGERS | |||
| dalek | r34007 | tewk++ | trunk: | 03:24 | |
| : [subid] remove backwards compat lookup via sub name | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34007 | |||
|
03:36
Hadi joined,
Hadi left
|
|||
| tewk | pmichaud: ping | 03:36 | |
| pmichaud | pong. | ||
| tewk | pmichaud: I'm trying to make methods and vtables not be in the namespace by default | 03:38 | |
| I'm getting a bulding PGE error, wondered if you could give be some ideas | |||
| nopastes coming. | |||
| pmichaud | I'm not too surprised that PGE might give an error | 03:39 | |
| tewk | right, I just want some help pointing me in the right direction. | ||
| nopaste | "tewk" at 155.97.237.62 pasted "error_message" (13 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/14982 | 03:40 | |
| "tewk" at 155.97.237.62 pasted "code_changes.diff" (31 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/14983 | |||
| pmichaud | easiest would be to have PGE generate :nsentry on the subs so that they do go into the namespace, yes? | 03:43 | |
| tewk | don't we want subs without nsentry to go into the namespace with the sub name? | 03:45 | |
| dalek | r34008 | cotto++ | trunk: | ||
| : [string] Add a (fixed) per-interp hash seed and remove the seed arg from string_hash(). | |||
| : This patch removes the possibility of causing strange failures by calling string_hash with a strange seed. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34008 | |||
| pmichaud | all of the subs that PGE generates are :method | ||
| which means they don't go into the namespace by default | |||
| :nsentry( ) would put them back there, which is fine. | 03:46 | ||
| tewk | they yes they should have :"nsentry | ||
| nopaste | "pmichaud" at 72.181.176.220 pasted "patch for PGE :nsentry" (22 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/14984 | ||
| tewk | :nsentry will default to use the sub name as | ||
| pmichaud | try that patch. It passes all of the PGE tests | ||
| (I didn't try other tests) | |||
| See if that gets you farther on the build (it should) | 03:47 | ||
| tewk | thanks | ||
| pmichaud | trac.parrot.org is giving me "Internal Server Error" | ||
| dalek | r34009 | jkeenan++ | trunk: | 03:48 | |
| : Remove configuration probe for asynchronous input/output per architect's instruction in RT 57920. Remove associated test file and reference to auto::aio in list of configuration steps, dummy files used in testing, etc. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34009 | |||
| chromatic | That bit about the theme song by Brian Eno was my idea. | 04:08 | |
| Just so you don't blame anyone else. | |||
|
04:12
vaidyagi joined
04:16
Zaba_ joined
04:28
Andy joined
|
|||
| dalek | r34010 | pmichaud++ | trunk: | 04:29 | |
| : [rakudo]: Clean up stringification of mappings. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34010 | |||
| r34011 | pmichaud++ | trunk: | 04:31 | ||
| : [rakudo]: Add .pred and .succ methods for Int/Str/Num (RT #61420) | |||
| : * Patch courtesy Eric Hodges <eric.hodges@gmail.com> | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34011 | |||
|
05:00
apeiron joined
|
|||
| cotto | r34008 requires a make clean | 05:02 | |
|
05:25
Andy joined
05:31
Alias joined
|
|||
| allison | Whiteknight: ping | 05:45 | |
| Alias starts build run for Vanilla Alpha 3 | 05:46 | ||
| Hopefully this time I'll have something that doesn't suck | |||
| allison | purl: the theme song by Brian Eno is chromatic's idea | 05:47 | |
| purl | OK, allison. | ||
| Alias | Has todays release process kicked off yet? | 05:49 | |
| GeJ | Alias: release has been completed already. | 05:50 | |
| Alias | aha, I didn't see that | ||
| Alias grabs | |||
| GeJ | only problem seems to be distribution-related. | ||
| some parrot.org ftp credentials if I grokked it correctly. | |||
| Alias | ftp://ftp.parrot.org/pub/parrot/releases/devel/0.8.2/ | 05:51 | |
| Empty :( | |||
| allison | I was just looking for the tarball to put up on parrot.org, but can't find Whiteknight | ||
| GeJ | I think that's why Whiteknight ans particle were looking after allison. | ||
| or is it looking "for" | 05:52 | ||
| I'll vote for "for" | |||
| allison | looks like Whiteknight is gone for the evening | ||
| GeJ | .o0(I knew I should have paid attention during english class) | 05:53 | |
| tewk | allison: I think he went to bed, 1:00 on the east cost | ||
| allison | did he give a copy of the tarball to anyone else? perhaps to whoever was going to do the CPAN upload? | ||
| Alias | (Interesting definition of "release") :) | ||
| GeJ | sending via mail was mentioned. | 05:54 | |
| tewk | He talked about emailing it to chromatic, or particle? | ||
| Not sure that he did it though | |||
| chromatic | I was going to upload it to PAUSE from the parrot.org URL. | ||
| There's no reason someone else can't make the tarball. | 05:55 | ||
| Alias | I was going to ask that... | ||
| Where's the script for generation the release tarball... | |||
| generating | |||
| allison | sure, just sync to the tag and rerun make release | 05:56 | |
| chromatic: was that a volunteer? or shall I do it? | 05:57 | ||
| chromatic | I can do it in an hour or so, if necessary. | ||
| I don't have parrot.org access. | |||
| allison | you will momentarily | ||
| hmmm... I don't have your pgp key, checking a public server | 05:58 | ||
| chromatic: goodness, you have 4 of them, all to the same email address. which one do you actually use these days? | 05:59 | ||
| chromatic | Uh, good question. | 06:11 | |
| purl | Yeah, it is. I'm stumped. | ||
| chromatic | I can give you my ssh public key. | ||
| I don't remember my PGP/GPG key. | |||
| Alias, did you see my note about the PARROT_RUNTIME environment variable? You should be able to set the path there. | 06:13 | ||
| Alias | I saw it, it's a bit clunky and I'd rather wait for a more robust option | ||
| For now, I'll just build parrot in the install location I want | |||
| I'll switch to whatever your new path management solution is in Jan | 06:14 | ||
| chromatic | I'll think about ways to make pbc_to_exe respect install locations. I think I can make that work trivially. | ||
| Alias | It would be nice if we could make something work at minimum as nice as Perl 5 | ||
| chromatic | I can add an -I flag to the executables generated by pbc_to_exe. | 06:15 | |
| Alias | Hard-coded paths embedded inside libs and exes more or less rules out doing relocation or Portable stuff | ||
| chromatic | True. | ||
| But we have backwards compatibility with Perl 4 to consider, so we can't change too much. | |||
| Alias | Perl 5 has fixed the embedded part, it just didn't fix the Config stuff | ||
| Wait, what? | 06:16 | ||
| purl | Wait, is, like, that counting penguins | ||
| chromatic | You furriners, you always forget that America invented sarcasm. | ||
| Alias | I could parse it as sarcasm either, since Perl 5 already fixed this and Perl 6 is currently worse :) | ||
| And I wasn't around for Perl 4 :) | |||
| Gah, bug, restarting build again :( | 06:17 | ||
| szabgab | parrot is dead, padre rulez, let me bring the facts: www.ohloh.net/p/compare?metric=Act...t_1=Parrot especially the statisticans among us | 06:26 | |
| cotto | I guess it's time to switch projects. | 06:27 | |
| join #padre | 06:28 | ||
| Alias | In parrot's defense, in Padre we commit every single line changed separately | 06:32 | |
| cotto | Is there an advantage to that approach? | 06:36 | |
| szabgab | sure, we have higher commit count on Ohloh :-) | 06:37 | |
| Alias | Some interesting numbers in these graphs | 06:38 | |
| www.ohloh.net/languages/compare?co...ntributors | 06:39 | ||
| 500 Python developers appearing in the space of 3 months... | 06:40 | ||
| dalek | r34012 | allison++ | cc_restart: | 06:43 | |
| : [calling_conventions] Adding enum flags for invocant arguments. (Causes no test failures.) | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34012 | |||
| Hinrik | I'm not sure I grok this... www.ohloh.net/languages/compare?me...mit=Update | 06:44 | |
|
06:44
Theory joined
|
|||
| Hinrik | ah, never mind | 06:44 | |
| szabgab | Hinrik: in just means that C is dying | 06:45 | |
| unless of course you happen to use C.. | 06:46 | ||
| Khisanth | C and C/C++ is the same color ... | 06:51 | |
| chromatic | Hm, we now have an xconf directory. | 07:04 | |
| moritz | re | 07:13 | |
| chromatic | Ahh, Drupal. You'd think a CMS would be able to publish HTML correctly. | 07:16 | |
| allison | chromatic: I believe we had this conversation last month :) | 07:17 | |
| chromatic | I would think that publishing HTML is a core competence of a web publishing platform. | 07:19 | |
| Frankly, if they're surprised at how anchor tags work in 2008, some 17 years after the invention of HTML, perhaps these people should find another hobby. | |||
|
07:48
ffwonko joined
|
|||
| cotto | chromatic, I'd appreciate it if you could take a look at TT #59 when you have a chance. | 07:50 | |
| chromatic | Hm, that's odd. | 07:54 | |
| allison | For those eagerly waiting in the wings, chromatic regenerated the tarball and it's now available on www.parrot.org/release/current | 07:55 | |
| cotto | Yes it is. | ||
| chromatic | I wonder if the free list is corrupt somehow. | 07:56 | |
| GeJ | allison: can this url be used for distros as official source? Or is CPAN the prefered way? | 07:58 | |
| allison | GeJ: this is the official link for current and future releases, CPAN is going away next month | 07:59 | |
| GeJ | Ok, I'll try to update the FreeBSD port tomorrow. | 08:00 | |
| there's still this proble I encountered when parrot is built by root. | 08:01 | ||
|
08:01
iblechbot joined
|
|||
| dalek | r34013 | allison++ | cc_restart: | 08:04 | |
| : [calling_conventions] Process an optional invocant argument when building the | |||
| : CallSignature object. (Causes no test failures.) | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34013 | |||
| allison | GeJ: is the FreeBSD port in the official ports tree for FreeBSD yet? | 08:05 | |
| GeJ: Randi Harper from FreeBSD was talking to me about getting it in last month | 08:09 | ||
| moritz | purl: msg jonathan rakudoreg seems to break November pretty badly, the exact failure mode depends on the order in which the classes are precompiled. For example if I compile Novemeber.pm first, it dies with "Attempt to inherit from non-existent parent class" | 08:16 | |
| purl | Message for jonathan stored. | ||
|
08:20
Hadi joined
08:21
Hadi left
|
|||
| chromatic | cotto, I wonder if the comment at src/hash.c:836 is significant. | 08:26 | |
| cotto, adding bucket->value = NULL; on line 1272 seems useful too. | 08:28 | ||
| lathos | Urgh. Why does it? | 08:29 | |
| cotto | first, it looks like it could be | ||
| second, nothing's getting deleted in the example | |||
| chromatic | I'm paranoid is why. | 08:30 | |
| cotto | Some parts of Parrot breed paranoia. | ||
| chromatic | IMCC, keys, hashes, GC.... | 08:31 | |
|
08:32
kj joined
|
|||
| chromatic | Hm, I wonder... bucket->next? | 08:36 | |
| The bucket->next handling in parrot_hash_put looks wrong to me. | 08:41 | ||
|
08:41
elmex joined
|
|||
| GeJ | allison: there's already a port for parrot in the FreeBSD tree (0.8.0 actually) but there seem to be a few issues with it : | 08:42 | |
| allison: for some reason, the port must be built by a non-root user (which makes it a no-no for the FreeBSD build cluster to make it a precompiled package) | 08:44 | ||
| and second, I'm not quite sure which languages are installed (if any) and how. | |||
| regarding the non-root user thingy on my machine, building parrot as root makes it break several tests that run just fine otherwise. | 08:46 | ||
|
08:48
masak joined
|
|||
| GeJ | hej masak | 08:53 | |
| masak | GeJ: hej GeJ | ||
| no release yet? | |||
| I thought I'd miss it by going to sleep. | 08:54 | ||
| cotto | the release has happened | ||
| masak | ah, but not the release email? | ||
| chromatic | Apparently not. | ||
| masak | looking forward to it. | 08:55 | |
| cotto | I've already gotten it. | ||
| (the email) | |||
| masak | ah, there it is! | ||
| it's gone out to parrot-dev, but not (it seems to me) to perl6-compiler | 08:56 | ||
|
08:56
iblechbot joined
|
|||
| cotto | isn't perl6-compiler being deprecated? | 08:56 | |
| moritz | no | ||
| perl6-internals is | |||
| masak | p6c is alive and well | ||
| actually, I just subscribed to parrot-dev the other day | 08:57 | ||
| cotto | nm. I was thinking of perl6-internals. | ||
| masak | I get most of my info from p6c and p6l | ||
| chromatic | cotto, print out the pointer for each bucket in sanity_check. | 08:58 | |
| hash->bs+12: key and value are null (0x81234f8) | 08:59 | ||
| hash->bs+13: 'ļæ½' => (null) (0x8123504) | |||
| hash->bs+14: key and value are null (0x8123510) | |||
| Hm, no, that's not it. | 09:00 | ||
| cotto | looks disappointingly normal | 09:03 | |
| chromatic | Yes it does. | 09:04 | |
| purl | if you say so... | ||
| masak | still no release email to p6c. must have gotten stuck somewhere. | 09:25 | |
| moritz | masak: sometimes my emails to p6l need hours | ||
| chromatic | It's this line: hash->bi[hashval & hash->mask] = bucket; | 09:26 | |
| cotto | That's where the goofiness is exposed, but why does it occasionally break? | 09:28 | |
| makes sense that it'd involve the mask, since different keys cause different behaviors | |||
| chromatic | Maybe the bs/bi allocation is wrong. | 09:30 | |
| lines 34 and 35 | |||
| If I change the N_BUCKETS macro to return n, everything's fine. | 09:32 | ||
| cotto | I just did and found that | ||
| veeery suspicious | |||
| chromatic | I can't see how HASH_ALLOC_SIZE ever worked. | 09:33 | |
| cotto | I also note that MAXFULL_PERCENT seems to be an imaginary constant. | ||
| chromatic | Do we have #WISHFUL_THINKING defined somewhere around here? | 09:34 | |
| Why allocate fewer buckets than we have available slots? | 09:35 | ||
|
09:35
vaidyagi joined
|
|||
| chromatic | Especially when using a bucket system? | 09:35 | |
| cotto | It looks like the hash is expanded before it's possible for every bucket to be non-empty, but that doesn't mean anything about which buckets will be needed. | 09:36 | |
| chromatic | All tests pass by making N_BUCKETS an identity macro. | 09:38 | |
| I must sleep now though. | 09:39 | ||
| cotto | chromatic++ | 09:40 | |
| that also lets OrderedHash pass with a seed that previously caused it to fail | 09:41 | ||
|
10:04
masak joined
10:12
ffwonko joined
10:13
ChrisDavaz joined
|
|||
| dalek | r34014 | kjs++ | trunk: | 10:38 | |
| : [t] Remove all tests with slicing syntax. This are 22 (this is half of the tests in the file!) tests from t/pmc/iterator.t. | |||
| : + the [a,b] variant will be removed | |||
| : + the [a..b] variant will be removed | |||
| : + the [..b] variant will be removed | |||
| : + the [a..] variant will be removed. | |||
| : IMCC grammar updates follow later. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34014 | |||
|
10:41
masak joined
10:42
Hadi joined
|
|||
| jonathan | morning all | 10:43 | |
| purl | afternoon, jonathan | ||
| masak | jonathan: morning. | ||
| jonathan | hi masak | ||
| kj | good morning | 10:44 | |
|
10:46
kj left
10:47
kj joined
|
|||
| dalek | r34015 | kjs++ | trunk: | 10:50 | |
| : [imcc] remove ".." from IMCCs lexer. This token is only used for slicing syntax, which is deprecated. This patch makes it impossible to use slicing syntax using '..'. The parser still needs to be cleaned up for this, as well as to disallow the [a,b], as the ',' token cannot be removed (as it's used in other parser rules as well). | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34015 | |||
|
10:52
bacek joined
|
|||
| jonathan | So...what holdeth the RT queue... | 11:03 | |
| dalek | r34016 | kjs++ | trunk: | 11:09 | |
| : [t] Remove a test that checks for not-allowing slice syntax in namespaces. | |||
| : The test checks that [a,b] will emit the proper error message. As the [a,b] syntax is deprecated and will be removed shortly, the test is no longer necessary. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34016 | |||
| jonathan | perl6: class A { my $a = method { say self.WHAT }; method x {self.$a() } }; A.new.x | 11:17 | |
| polyglotbot | OUTPUT[Aā¤] | ||
| jonathan | Oh, that was the one that does work... | 11:18 | |
|
11:19
bacek joined
|
|||
| dalek | r34017 | kjs++ | trunk: | 11:19 | |
| : [t] minor changes to test that remove tests for [a,b] syntax in orderedhash.t | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34017 | |||
| r34018 | jonathan++ | trunk: | 11:38 | ||
| : [rakudo] Make sure we give correct error message when multiple dispatch ties on a bunch of candidates all with non-matching constraints. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34018 | |||
|
12:09
clunker3 joined
12:10
ruoso joined
12:11
purl joined
|
|||
| dalek | r34019 | jonathan++ | trunk: | 12:13 | |
| : [rakudo] Fix a test for multi-dispatch that didn't create classes the Perl 6 way to do so. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34019 | |||
|
12:15
TiMBuS joined,
gaz joined
|
|||
| bacek requesting logo for Rakudo... | 12:19 | ||
|
12:19
donaldh joined
|
|||
| masak | bacek: is it urgent? | 12:39 | |
| bacek | masak: no... But we really need good one | 12:40 | |
| masak | aye, we do. | ||
| I sometimes spend a few minutes thinking about what would be a good logo. | 12:41 | ||
| dalek | r34020 | jonathan++ | trunk: | 12:44 | |
| : [rakudo] Add Callable role, make Code do it and make sure parameters with the & sigil require it. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34020 | |||
| jonathan | Two masakbugs down! | 12:45 | |
| masak | jonathan++ | 12:46 | |
| keep crushing those masakbugs. | |||
| tewk | pmichaud: so pir :methods won't be in a namespace by default, so I'm assuming any !EXPORT ed methods should be marked with :nsentry right | 12:48 | |
| jonathan | tewk: I think EXPORT takes them and inserts them into the ns. | 12:49 | |
| Oh, I see what you mean - we could maybe get rid of !EXPORT... | |||
| tewk | Yeah but it takes them from a namespace and they won't be there anymore. | 12:50 | |
| jonathan | Oh. | ||
| That could cause some...issues. | |||
| I'll leave pmichaud to answer what he wants to do on this. | |||
| tewk | Unless marked with :nsentry | ||
| jonathan | *nod* | 12:51 | |
| tewk | Yeah I'm attempting to fix rakudo, but I wanted to make sure I'm doing the right thing before I get to deep. | ||
| jonathan | Yeah, I see what you're getting at. | ||
| I'm not sure if they are meant to appear in the namespace they are declared in. | |||
| In which case I guess we'd want to look 'em up by subid. But that'll be quite a bit more code. | 12:52 | ||
| We may settle for making them nsentry for now, until we have a Perl 6 prelude, and 'is export' can do the required thing and we don't have to care about the code being concise. :-) | |||
| Anyway, will let pm make the final call. | |||
|
12:54
tetragon joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | yes, !EXPORTed methods also belong in the namespace. | 12:54 | |
|
12:55
peters joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | (i.e., they need :nsentry) | 12:55 | |
| peters | Hi folks | ||
| jonathan | pmichaud: But in the namespace of the class that declared them? | ||
| pmichaud | yes. | ||
| jonathan | OK. | ||
| I wasn't sure about that. | |||
| pmichaud | for now it's okay. It may even be "forever". | ||
| jonathan | OK | ||
| pmichaud | otherwise, I'm not sure how one will do &Foo::method | ||
| (or even if such a thing is possible) | 12:57 | ||
| but the ones that are marked "!EXPORT" are methods that are also callable as subs, so they definitely belong in the namespace :-) | |||
| tewk gets out his :nsentry pen and goes to work. | 12:58 | ||
| jonathan | Yes, I'm not sure if Foo::method should work | ||
| erm, &Foo::method | |||
| pmichaud | (in the larger view -- those are the methods that have the "is export" trait, so they're definitely exported as subs.) | ||
| jonathan | I know you can do $x.Foo::bar(...) | ||
| But that may be handled differently. | |||
| (As in, looking at superclass stuff.) | 12:59 | ||
| pmichaud | yes, I suspect it will be. | 13:00 | |
| jonathan | Gah...Parrot's Object clone doesn't appear to clone attributes. | 13:01 | |
| pmichaud | not by default. | 13:02 | |
| there's a !CLONEATTR method I created for that. | |||
| jonathan | Oh, cunning. | ||
| pmichaud | (in Object.pir) | ||
| I think Range uses it. | |||
| jonathan | Heh. What if I wanna clone every attr? :-) | 13:03 | |
| Hmm. In fact it's accidental that Object doesn't clone the attributes. | |||
| When I implemented it, I did | |||
| cloned_guts->attrib_store = VTABLE_clone(INTERP, obj->attrib_store); | |||
| Thinking that ResizablePMCArray cloned its contents too. | |||
| pmichaud | it does not. | 13:04 | |
| I even filed a ticket about that. :-) | |||
| jonathan | Indeed. | ||
| pmichaud | then I retracted the ticket :-) | ||
| jonathan | OK, so where on earth to put the fix... :-) | ||
| I'm happy enough ResizablePMCArray doesn't clone its contents. | |||
| pmichaud | please don't make ResizablePMC... right | ||
| jonathan | Object OTOH. | ||
| pmichaud | that would cause some issues right now. | ||
| tewk | [06:03:07] t/pmc/perl6multisub-type........1/13 Null PMC access in invoke() | ||
| current instr.: 'role' pc 246 (t/pmc/perl6multisub-type.t:84) | |||
| called from Sub 'main' pc 49 (t/pmc/perl6multisub-type.t:28) | |||
| help | |||
| pmichaud | it's okay with me if Object clones its attributes | ||
| jonathan | tewk: Are you working in trunk, and at svn head? | 13:05 | |
|
13:05
Whiteknight joined
|
|||
| jonathan | pmichaud: Well, it's what I originally intended it to. | 13:05 | |
| tewk | Yes, but I've got :nsentry patches. | ||
| jonathan | tewk: And it didn't fail before them? | 13:06 | |
| I just had to fix that test because it didn't do Perl6-ish enough classes. | |||
| tewk | I'm assuming not, I didn't check. checking. | ||
| jonathan | tewk: See if you get any failures elsewhere. | ||
| Like, in the multi spectests. | |||
| pmichaud | I wonder if changing Object.clone will change anything else (more) | ||
|
13:06
Hadi left
|
|||
| pmichaud | i.e., I wonder if I wrote any code assuming that Object.clone didn't clone its attributes. | 13:06 | |
| (e.g., in PGE) | 13:07 | ||
| jonathan | CLONEATTR? ;-) | ||
| Yeah | |||
| tewk | I'm at r34004 | ||
| jonathan | "I meant it to do X originally" doesn't mean everyone else. | ||
| pmichaud | anyway, maybe try it and see what breaks... ? | ||
| but automatically cloning the attributes is somewhat what I would expect. | |||
| jonathan | Yeah. | ||
| It makes writing clone method for Object rather easier too ;-) | |||
| peters | rakudo: grammar Foo::Bar { token foo { 'foo' } }; say('foo' ~~ /^<Foo::Bar::foo>$/); | 13:11 | |
| Whiteknight | Yay! Trac is letting me log in this morning! | ||
| polyglotbot | OUTPUT[get_string() not implemented in class 'ResizableStringArray'ā¤current instr.: 'parrot;PGE;Match;new' pc 176 (compilers/pge/PGE/Match.pir:115)ā¤called from Sub '' pc 416 (EVAL_13:177)ā¤called from Sub '_block34' pc 291 (EVAL_13:126)ā¤called from Sub 'parrot;Code;ACCEPTS' pc 6730 | ||
| ..(src/classes/Code.pir:65)ā¤called from Sub '_block11' pc 38 (EVAL_... | |||
| peters | Looks like I found a issue using grammar namespace, s/Foo::// and it works | ||
| jonathan | peters: I think there's a patch in RT to help with that, I just didn't get to reviewing/applying it yet. | ||
| pmichaud: We make it through the build...running Parrot tests now. | 13:12 | ||
| pmichaud | yes, Chris Dolan sent a patch, I believe. | ||
| jonathan | Yes. | ||
| peters | jonathan: ok =) | ||
| jonathan | pmichaud: Ah. We now fail range.t in sanity... | 13:15 | |
| And at least copy.t in Parrot tests. | |||
| Oh, wait, maybe I did it wrong. | |||
| pmichaud | anyway, this is something I noticed -- Hash does a deep-clone, ResizablePMCArray doesn't. :-) | 13:16 | |
| jonathan | Ah. | ||
| pmichaud | that actually turns out to be the right semantics for Perl 6, so I'm not complaining. :-) | ||
| jonathan | Maybe that's why I expected ResizalbePMCArray to... | ||
| pmichaud | afk for a bit | 13:17 | |
| jonathan | Ah...that looks better. | 13:22 | |
| tewk | jonathan: at -r34020 now still have error. Almost all my errors have to do with a missing :nsentry, I just don't know where with this one. | 13:30 | |
| jonathan | tewk: OK. I'd be intereted to know if there are problems with any of the other multi dispatch tests. | 13:31 | |
| tewk: As in, the ones in make spectest | |||
| tewk | yes, but I fixed them | ||
| jonathan | If not, this failure may well be bogus. | ||
| tewk | wait looking for role_1 definition | ||
| jonathan | tewk: perl6multisub-type.t, right? | 13:32 | |
| Which test fails? | 13:33 | ||
| We do a $P1 = find_global 'role_1' | |||
| But that's not marked :method, so it should get an ns entry under role_1? | |||
| tewk | right | ||
| jonathan | Is that what's failing? | 13:34 | |
| tewk | adding ok() to the intermediaries so I can find out. | ||
| jonathan | Sure. | ||
| tewk | well that doesn't quite work, have to do isnull first | 13:35 | |
| pmichaud | find_global deprecated, fwiw. | 13:36 | |
| jonathan | pmichaud: Do we override clone anywhere? | 13:37 | |
| Say, on Int? | |||
| pmichaud | we do on Range | ||
| we do not on the others, afaik | |||
| I don't know if cloning would affect Protoobject | 13:38 | ||
| it appears that Range is the only rakudo class that overrides clone. | 13:39 | ||
| jonathan | ok | ||
| jonathan wonders why it ain't seeming to work | |||
| dalek | r34021 | Whiteknight++ | trunk: | 13:42 | |
| : [Release 0.8.2] Update trunk from release branch for 0.8.2 | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34021 | |||
| nopaste | "tewk" at 155.97.237.62 pasted "trace of perl6multisub-type.t" (45 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/14985 | 13:45 | |
| jonathan | tewk: What's on line 95 in your version? | 13:51 | |
| tewk | .sub 'role_2' | 13:52 | |
| jonathan | Hmm. | ||
| That doesn't make a lot of sense. :-S | |||
| tewk | before I added debug statements | ||
|
13:55
Andy joined
|
|||
| jonathan | tewk: Will look more in a moment - trying to work out what on earth is going on with this clone thing... | 13:57 | |
| dalek | r34022 | pmichaud++ | trunk: | ||
| : [rakudo]: spectest-progress.csv update: 250 files, 5170 passing, 0 failing | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34022 | |||
| pmichaud | ....I bet we can break 5200 today. :-) | ||
| jonathan | pmichaud: This is nuts. I wrote in Perl6Object a clone method as simple as $P0 = clone self | 13:59 | |
| ...and it doesn't appear to call Object.pmc's clone method :-S | 14:00 | ||
| As in, clone vtable | |||
| pmichaud | a vtable function, or 'clone'? | ||
| ah, right. | |||
| did you put $P0 = clone self into the vtable function? | |||
| wouldn't that be... recursive? | |||
| jonathan | no | ||
| pmichaud | okay. | 14:01 | |
| jonathan | normal method | ||
| .namespace ['Perl6Object'] | |||
| .sub 'clone' :method | |||
| say "P6O-Clone" $P0 = clone self | |||
| say "P6O-Clone-End" .return ($P0) | |||
| .end | |||
| with the missing line breaks... | |||
| pmichaud | oh, and then you're calling it with .clone | ||
| jonathan | $object.clone() | ||
| Yes | |||
| pmichaud | and it doesn't get called? | ||
| jonathan | Oh, that gets called. | ||
| But I put a printf into Object.pmc's clone VTABLE method to see it gets called and it doesn't print. | 14:02 | ||
| I get the P6O-Clone and P6O-Clone-End but nothing from the clone vtable meth.. | |||
| Hmm. | |||
| jonathan whips out a C debugger | 14:03 | ||
| pmichaud | I can't think of any reason why it shouldn't be called. | ||
| jonathan | pmichaud: OH NO! | 14:06 | |
| Parrot_ObjectRef_clone | |||
| GETATTR_ObjectRef_value(interp, pmc, value); | |||
| copy = pmc_new_init(interp, pmc->vtable->base_type, value); | |||
| return copy; | |||
| *that's* why | |||
| Why did we set it up to just clone the ObjectRef and not the underlying thingy it refers to? | 14:07 | ||
| Is there a reason? | |||
| Oh | |||
| It was probably so the copy op did the Right Thing maybe... | |||
| pmichaud | cloning an ObjectRef should _not_ clone its underlying thing. | ||
| References are objects too. | |||
| jonathan | Right. | 14:08 | |
| pmichaud | inside of the 'clone' method, you have to make sure it's not an ObjectRef | ||
| jonathan | Well, just deref if it is? | ||
| pmichaud | sure, that works. | ||
| jonathan | OK. | ||
| Phew. I thought I was going nuts for a momnet. | |||
| pmichaud | (assuming deref works. I've had some interesting stuff there.) | 14:09 | |
| jonathan | Phew. | 14:10 | |
| Now to remove the loads of debug code... | |||
| pmichaud | it might be nice if method dispatch to an objectref could dispatch to the underlying value instead of the objectref itself. | 14:11 | |
| I don't know if that's workable, though. | |||
| jonathan | Probably easy to sneak it when I'm re-doing the dispatching stuff next month. | 14:12 | |
| pmichaud: I did test Parrot, Rakudo, PGE and NQP with this clone patch. | 14:16 | ||
| Anything else? | |||
| purl | i guess Anything else is tp's flinching or anticipating. | ||
| masak | purl: forget anything else | ||
| purl | masak: I forgot anything else | ||
| pmichaud | not that I can think of. If that was the original intended semantic, there's reason to go ahead and put it in. | ||
| jonathan | *nod* | ||
| pmichaud | if it breaks anything, blame me. :-) | ||
| jonathan | Nice! | 14:17 | |
| masak | purl: november? | ||
| purl | rumour has it november is at www.november-wiki.org/ or use.perl.org/~masak/journal/37212 | ||
| jonathan | Can I adopt this is a general principle? | ||
| masak | purl: jimmy? | ||
| purl | jimmy is, like, translating some docs to chinese | ||
| masak | purl: jimmy is also allegedly a sloth | ||
| purl | okay, masak. | ||
| pmichaud | jonathan: sure. | ||
| jonathan | Awesome! | ||
| purl | awesome is probably awesome.naquadah.org/ or not as awesome as xmonad | ||
| jonathan breaks lots of stuff and blames pmichaud | |||
| masak | purl: forget awesome | 14:18 | |
| purl | masak: I forgot awesome | ||
| jonathan | masak: Is there an idiots guide to running November? | ||
| The Perl 6 version? | |||
| purl | the perl 6 version is actually cleaner | ||
| masak | jonathan: closest thing is the README, I think | ||
| jonathan | OK | ||
| masak | purl: forget the perl 6 version | ||
| purl | masak: I forgot perl 6 version | ||
|
14:18
pete joined
|
|||
| masak | jonathan: I should probably blog about that too | 14:18 | |
| jonathan | It's probably easiest to just get it and try and work out what is up with it in my branch. | 14:19 | |
| dalek | r34023 | Whiteknight++ | trunk: | ||
| : [Docs] update release manager guide with a little bit more info about FTP uploads | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34023 | |||
|
14:20
gryphon joined
|
|||
| dalek | r34024 | Whiteknight++ | RELEASE_0_8_2: | 14:29 | |
| : Deleting release branch | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34024 | |||
| tewk | jonathan: so its invoking Perl6MultiSub on a instance of C1 | ||
| jonathan | tewk: Yes. | ||
| nopaste | "tewk" at 155.97.237.62 pasted "gdb backtrace" (25 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/14987 | 14:30 | |
| jonathan | Oh, it segvs? | ||
| tewk | well it tries to invoke on the NULL pmc which throws an exception, | 14:31 | |
| jonathan | Yeah | ||
| tewk | I'm breaking on exit. | ||
| jonathan | Hmm. | ||
| Is this the _only_ test that breaks? | |||
| Because what these tests do from PIR is basically try and fake up how the call would look in Perl 6. | 14:32 | ||
| PerlJam | good morning #parrot | 14:33 | |
| jonathan | afternoon, PerlJam | ||
| PerlJam | good awake-time to you jonathan :-) | 14:34 | |
| jonathan | Whee. 5 more tests unfudged | 14:37 | |
| dalek | r34025 | jonathan++ | trunk: | ||
| : [core] I intended that the Object PMC's clone method would clone the attributes. Turns out, ResizablePMCArray doesn't clone its elements, so that wasn't happening. So, this does the cloning in Object's clone vtable method. Tested with various things and nothing breaks. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34025 | |||
| r34026 | jonathan++ | trunk: | |||
| : [rakudo] First cut of the clone method (argumentless version). | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34026 | |||
| jonathan | tewk: In other words, if all of make spectest passes, and all the other sanity tests, then I maybe wouldn't worry too much about this one - I can debug and clean it up. | 14:38 | |
| tewk | well it kills make test, I'll comment it out and try going forward. | 14:39 | |
| :q | |||
| masak | a vi user! :) | ||
| moritz | those aren't all that sparsely distributed :) | 14:40 | |
| masak | I know that. | ||
| jonathan is a windows user and just thought it was a sticking out tongue with a piercing smiley | |||
| masak | I'm one, too. | ||
| jonathan: there's vim on Windows, too, I'm sure. | |||
| PerlJam | jonathan: we won't hold it against you. | ||
| tewk | make test passes. | 14:41 | |
| spectest running | |||
| jonathan | Fail. We have no tests for cloning while changing attrs. | ||
| pmichaud | jonathan: we don't need to fix it right away, but the version of 'clone' in Object.pir gets the vtable backwards | 14:42 | |
| tewk | Null PMC access in invoke() | ||
| current instr.: 'postcircumfix:{ }' pc 1610 (src/classes/Associative.pir:74) | |||
| booom | 14:43 | ||
| masak | booom! :D | ||
| sorry, old habit. | |||
| pmichaud | tewk: Associative.pir:29 needs :nsentry | ||
| or, more likely :subid | 14:44 | ||
| jonathan | pmichaud: Backwards? | ||
| purl | Backwards is factoid | ||
| pmichaud | the Object vtable for clone should call the 'clone' method, not vice-versa | ||
| (yes, I realize this makes things tricky) | 14:45 | ||
| jonathan | erm | ||
| if we do that... | |||
| Yeah. | |||
| pmichaud | but using $P0 = clone obj in PIR should use obj's 'clone' method if it exists. | ||
| jonathan | I think we'll not fix this one right away. :-) | ||
| pmichaud | same as how $S0 = obj should use obj's 'Str' method if it exists. | ||
| (this is where Parrot vtables make us turn things inside-out a bit.) | 14:46 | ||
| jonathan | *nod* | ||
| pmichaud | however | 14:47 | |
| since there are a few places in the code that use the "clone" op instead of calling .clone, we're likely to run into some issues anyway. | 14:48 | ||
| I'm still trying to decide exactly where the "opcode versus method" approach to doing things falls in Rakudo. | 14:49 | ||
| if we want to have cross-HLL capabilities, we really need to use opcodes and not method calls. | |||
| jonathan | Yes. | ||
| pmichaud | but in order for that to work, we really need to be able to access parent-class vtable operations | ||
| i.e., to be able to define new vtable operations in terms of the parent-class vtable operations | 14:50 | ||
| jonathan | I don't think there's an easy way to do that right now. | ||
| pmichaud | Coke's trick works for subclasses of PMCs | ||
| jonathan | Yes. | ||
| pmichaud | I don't know that we have a way to do it for things that need to access Object's vtable functions, though. | ||
| (such as 'clone') | |||
| jonathan | *nod* | 14:51 | |
| pmichaud | maybe add a note to the 'clone' method saying that it's inside-out for now, so people won't replicate that meme? | ||
| jonathan | Can do. | 14:52 | |
| pmichaud: When we move into our own repo, do you expect we'll track Parrot head, or try and track monthly releases? | 14:54 | ||
| (In the beginning, not long term.) | |||
| pmichaud | through at least March, we'll track head. | 14:55 | |
| I suspect we'll track head through July. | |||
| I think that Rakudo will need enough intimate changes in Parrot for a while that we'll have to continue to track head, as opposed to a monthly release. | 14:56 | ||
| jonathan | Yes, I think so too. | ||
| masak | as soon as Rakudo and Parrot are decoupled, we will have twice as many revision numbers to care about when tracking bugs. | 14:57 | |
| jonathan | It's one of those things we need to do, but that I don't look forward to. | 14:58 | |
| masak | aye. | ||
| pmichaud | I do not expect to refer to things by revision numbers. | ||
| I expressed my opposition to them at PDS. I prefer month releases. | |||
| masak | also, where will Rakudo development take place? #rakudo? | ||
| pmichaud | i.e., "Jan 2009 release" instead of "0.9.0" | ||
| jonathan | Pleae not a third IRC channel. | 14:59 | |
| pmichaud | rakudo will continue in #parrot and #perl6 | ||
| jonathan | #perl6 and #parrot are enough :-) | ||
| masak | indeed. | ||
| pmichaud | there's no need for its own chan. | ||
| we'll continue to discuss parrot-related items here, and perl6-related items on #perl6, and if there's a bit of cross talk or overlap it's no big deal. | 15:00 | ||
| moritz | actually there are already some discussions spread out between #perl6 and #parrot, doing that with three channels would be insane | ||
| pmichaud | right | ||
| to the extent that things start to not fit in #parrot we'll just do them in #perl6 | |||
| (release numbers), so, when referring to Parrot releases I'll continue to say, e.g., "May 2009" release instead of "1.x". | 15:01 | ||
| what is likely to be a bit trickier is repository revision numbers :-) | 15:02 | ||
| tewk | perls Test::* need a zentest like module | ||
| anyone every used zentest on ruby? | 15:03 | ||
| pmichaud | afk for a bit | ||
| dalek | r34027 | Whiteknight++ | trunk: | 15:06 | |
| : [compilers/bcg] Remove unused compilers/bcg/ as per TT#33 | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34027 | |||
| PerlJam | If either repo moves to git, there won't be "revision numbers" per se any more. :-) | 15:16 | |
| masak | mm, git. | 15:20 | |
|
15:27
xiaoyafeng joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | I'm thinking rakudo might move to git. | 15:29 | |
| dalek | r34028 | jonathan++ | trunk: | ||
| : [rakudo] Generate private accessor methods for attributes. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34028 | |||
| pmichaud | (back just for a second... gone again) | ||
| dalek | r34029 | jonathan++ | trunk: | ||
| : [rakudo] Implement version of clone that takes named parameters and sets attributes. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34029 | |||
|
15:29
Theory joined
|
|||
| jonathan | Things people most mistook for the messiah in 2008: (1) Obama. (2) git. | 15:30 | |
|
15:30
rdice joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | ...private accessors exist? | 15:30 | |
| jonathan | pmichaud: I've read and re-read that bit of the synopsis and concluded that they do seem to. | ||
| pmichaud | so then Foo{ ... } just uses the private accessors? | 15:31 | |
| (which would be very cool) | |||
| (from a compiler standpoint) | |||
| oops, gotta go | |||
| bbl | |||
| jonathan | pmichaud: Well, the spec also says it's non-virtual. | 15:32 | |
| (e.g. a submethod) | |||
| Maybe. | |||
| The bit that sold it for me was | |||
| "Outside the class you must use the public . form, or rely on a method call (which can be a private method call, but only for trusted classes)." | |||
| You can't do a private method call if there's no private method. | |||
|
15:34
jimmy joined
|
|||
| jimmy | jimmy? | 15:35 | |
| purl | i think jimmy is translating some docs to chinese. or allegedly a sloth | ||
|
15:35
gaurav joined
15:56
pjcj joined
|
|||
| Whiteknight | purl? | 15:59 | |
| purl | Whiteknight? | ||
| Whiteknight | Whiteknight? | ||
| purl | it has been said that Whiteknight is updating the book. It talks about .pragma fastcall, pushing and popping arguments onto the user stack, etc | ||
| Whiteknight | purl forget Whiteknight | 16:00 | |
| purl | Whiteknight: I forgot whiteknight | ||
| masak | purl: masak? | ||
| purl | i heard masak was _not_ my best friend! or the cause of much confusion for purl or my worst nemesis or the anti-purl or out to get you or greatly tired of purl | ||
| moritz | :-) | ||
| masak | damn straight. | ||
| purl | kick ass! | ||
| moritz | moritz? | ||
| purl | rumour has it moritz is Moritz Lenz, mailto:moritz@faui2k3.org | ||
| Whiteknight | purl: purl? | ||
| purl | i am a she. | ||
| dalek | r34030 | jonathan++ | trunk: | 16:04 | |
| : [rakudo] Fix indirect calls on private methoeds. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34030 | |||
| PerlJam | Whiteknight++ | 16:07 | |
| jonathan | Can someone on a non-Windows platform with a recentish Rakudo do ./perl6 -e 'print "hi"; my $a = =$*IN' | 16:09 | |
| And see if it prints hi before asking for input? | |||
| It does on Win32, so I think the bug has been fixed, but would like to hear from someone on $other_os | |||
| moritz tries... | 16:10 | ||
| purl | tries are magical things that are especially good at finding prefixes of strings. | ||
| PerlJam | jonathan: aye. | ||
| masak | it prints "hi" before asking for input here on Linux. | ||
| jonathan | Great. | 16:11 | |
| Then it's fixed. | |||
| moritz | another closed ticket :) | ||
| didn't masak open that one? :-) | |||
| masak | aye. :) | ||
| moritz | works for me too | ||
| jonathan | OK, that's an easy ticket. | ||
| masak | if you insist on closing my tickets, then I guess I'll have to figure out new ones. :) | ||
| moritz | should I start questioning my sanity if I remember ticket <-> requestor relations even if I never fully read the ticket? :-) | 16:12 | |
| PerlJam | moritz: you're a fairly active perlmonk ... could you announce the new parrot release there? | ||
| moritz | PerlJam: if Whiteknight doesn't want to do it himself, I can | ||
| PerlJam | Hmm. It's not on perlbuzz either. | 16:13 | |
| Someone shoudl write a little "announce" script that gets run as the last step of the release :) | |||
| masak | that's actually a good idea. | 16:14 | |
| even if the script mostly delegates to humans. | |||
| PerlJam | of course it's a good idea, otherwise I wouldn't have said it :) | ||
| Whiteknight | I looked a perlmonks, couldn't find a place to submit a story | ||
| masak | PerlJam: of course. :) | ||
| moritz | Whiteknight: www.perlmonks.org/?node=Perl%20News scroll to them bottom of the page | ||
| the "Add a piece of Perl News" has very bad contrast in the standard css :( | 16:15 | ||
| masak | security through obscurity? :) | ||
| pmichaud | jonathan: (#61356) okay, here's one that has been in the back of my mind lately: { my $x; class Foo { method a() { say $x; } }; $x = 3; Foo.a(); } | 16:16 | |
| I don't have any good ideas for solving that one. | |||
| moritz | masak: obscurity through carelessness | ||
| jonathan | pmichaud: Should print 3? | 16:17 | |
| pmichaud | according to the spec, yes. | ||
| But when do we close over the class? | |||
| or the method? | |||
| purl | i heard the method was a good start | ||
| masak | purl: forget the method | 16:18 | |
| purl | masak: I forgot method | ||
| jonathan | The :init :load block for the class should probably close over the methods, and that in turn should be closed over at the start of the opening {, no? | ||
| s/opening {/outer block/ | |||
| pmichaud | except that at the time we process class (BEGIN), we haven't finished compiling its outer scope yet. | ||
| so there's no $x or :outer that we can reasonably attach to. | |||
| jonathan | We're not *really* doing them at BEGIN time yet, but yes, when we start doing that, it will hurt. | 16:19 | |
| pmichaud | right. | ||
| again, just a longer-term thought, not something I want to fix today. | |||
| but it's going to affect any classes that expect to access their outer scopes. | |||
| jonathan | I would be happy saying, you shouldn't be messing with lexicals declared in a not-yet-finished-compiling scope. | ||
| Whether the spec would let us get away with that, I'm not sure. | 16:20 | ||
| pmichaud | me neither. | ||
| oh well, we'll figure it out when we get there. | |||
| jonathan | We can come back and set_outer later on. | ||
| pmichaud | yes, but we'd also have to re-capture the method | ||
| jonathan | The method or just the class block? | 16:21 | |
| pmichaud | the method | ||
| set_outer is a static thing, but setting an outer context is dynamic. | |||
| i.e., 'set_outer' currently works on subs, not contexts. | 16:22 | ||
| although perhaps it could work on the sub's current context as well. That might fix it. | |||
|
16:22
galf joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | i.e., when we set_outer on the block for class Foo, we end up changing its nested block's notion of what their outer contexts are | 16:23 | |
| jonathan | If it knocks out the sub's current context, does the sub not have to then go and relocate an outer context on its next invocation? | ||
| Oops | |||
| I mean if the sub's current context's outer context pointer | |||
| Oh, but that wouldn't follow down the chain to the methods. Hmm. | |||
| pmichaud | well, it would if we set it on the context | 16:24 | |
| (more) | |||
| when we compile Foo, its block gets invoked | |||
| that creates a context | |||
| and method a closes over that context | |||
| jonathan | Aha. | 16:25 | |
| pmichaud | i.e., method a's outer_ctx points to Foo's context | ||
| jonathan | So if we set that context's outer...we should be OK? | ||
| pmichaud | but at compilation time, Foo's context doesn't have an outer context | ||
| jonathan | *nod* | ||
| pmichaud | so yes, we might be OK in that case. | ||
| jonathan | That'd may fly. | ||
| pmichaud | okay, I think that's a workable strategy for now, when we get to that point. | 16:26 | |
| jonathan | If we have to make lexicals in an outer block available while that block is still in a half-compiled state, that's just nasty though. | ||
| We'd have to do nasty faked-up-context-that-we-make-real-later style stuff in that case. | 16:27 | ||
| pmichaud | I'll deal with that when I get there. We may have some "special lexicals" or special mechanisms for binding lexicals to things that were already compiled. | ||
| jonathan | I think we've got much more common things to be working on for now. | ||
| pmichaud | correct. | 16:28 | |
| jonathan | But fixing whatever was wrong with :load :init and :outter together would let us run that example. | ||
| Until we switch to really compiling classes at compile time. | |||
| Which I think we can comfortably put off for a while. | |||
| pmichaud | I'm wondering if the :load :init bug is fixed already -- haven't tried it recently. | ||
| jonathan | Ah. | 16:29 | |
| pmichaud | I don't think I've tried it since the lexicals merge. | ||
| jonathan | Is it not a PCT thingy that checks if you've got the two in combination and drops the otuer? | ||
| pmichaud | currently, yes. | ||
| although I think I also did a test that determined it was just :init (or just :load) that was the issue. | |||
| jonathan | I guess it's easy to coomment that bit out and quickly see if it works. | ||
| jonathan wonders where it'd be | 16:30 | ||
| masak | purl: infinite regress is <reply>see infinite loop | 16:31 | |
| purl | OK, masak. | ||
| pmichaud | compilers/src/POST/Compiler.pir | ||
| masak | purl: infinite loop is <reply>see infinite regress | ||
| purl | ...but infinite loop is perl -e'{redo}' or the name of the street the apple campus is built on... | ||
| masak | purl: no, infinite loop is <reply>see infinite regress | 16:32 | |
| purl | okay, masak. | ||
| pmichaud | jonathan: I think I took that workaround out already. | ||
| jonathan | pmichaud: Ah. | ||
| pmichaud | which tells me that the bug is gone. | ||
| jonathan | Ah. | 16:33 | |
| my $x = 42; class A { method x { say $x } }; A.new.x # still prints nothing | |||
| pmichaud | there may still be some :outer issues with classes, even if they aren't :load :init ones | ||
| the class block still gets invoked before its outer block. | 16:34 | ||
| so the $x that is in class A isn't referring to the $x that we just started. | |||
| what you just wrote is the same as | 16:35 | ||
| { my $x = 42; class A { method x { say $x } }; A.new.x } | |||
| and the class block gets executed before the outer block. | |||
| jonathan | Ah. | ||
| pmichaud | which means it's bound to an "autoclosed $x", which isn't the same $x we get upon invoking the outer block. | 16:36 | |
|
16:36
workbench joined
|
|||
| jonathan | Hmmm. Yes. | 16:36 | |
| pmichaud | otoh, I highly recommend using our $x in this case and avoiding the issue for a while. :-P | ||
| jonathan | ;-) | 16:37 | |
| Is this in the realm of, stuff that'll be a real pain to fix? | |||
| pmichaud | yes. | ||
| jonathan | If so, I'm going to leave it. | ||
| pmichaud | or, at least, the realm of stuff that if we fix it now will cause us pains with the other stuff we really ought to fix first | ||
| jonathan | OK, we leave it. | ||
| pmichaud | it should wait. | ||
| on another topic... | 16:38 | ||
| :-) | |||
| jonathan | Does anyone have any opinions on rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57722 | ||
| It looks sane to me. | 16:39 | ||
| pmichaud | istr there was some discussion that ticket engendered | 16:40 | |
| but if it applies and passes the test, I'm okay with it for now. | |||
| jonathan | The discussion isn't on the ticket. | 16:41 | |
| Well, we're only going to be as wrong as Pugs and elf and Perl 5. ;-) | |||
| pmichaud | right, I think it was on p6l somewhere, contemporary with the ticket. | ||
| so yes, if it applies and passes the test, I'm okay with it. | 16:42 | ||
| hmmm, I need lunch. I can feel energy levels draining quickly. | |||
| are we just waiting back from November about the rakudoreg branch? | 16:46 | ||
| (ack, mangled that sentence, I did.) | |||
| is the rakudoreg branch just waiting on November confirmation? | |||
| jonathan | November is broken in the branch. :-( | 16:50 | |
| I probably need to get November and try it myself. | |||
| And debug from there. | |||
| masak | jonathan: good idea. | ||
| purl | masak: Good Idea: Cleaning up litter. Bad Idea: Cleaning up kitty litter. | ||
| jonathan | Unless someone can get me a small test case. | ||
| Which would be wonderful, but maybe hard. | 16:51 | ||
| masak | jonathan: sorry, I haven't been following the discussion. what's broken, where, how? | 16:52 | |
| (this might sound strange, but I don't currently have November either) | 16:53 | ||
| pmichaud | okay. I'm doing lunch -- then back to work on :load :init issues I guess. | ||
| Whiteknight | ditto, lunchtime | ||
| jonathan | masak: I have a branch called rakudoreg | ||
| It implements type registration and gets rid of the ucfirst typename hack, amongst other things. | 16:54 | ||
| It also makes use happen at compile time - we can't not now - but does it in a way that doesn't cause the previous problems that we had with that and November. | |||
| We pass all spectests, including some new use/class ones, and I did some checks on pre-compiled modules with classes and they work. | 16:55 | ||
| So I'm not sure what in November breaks. | |||
| masak | jonathan: how do you know that it breaks? | ||
| jonathan | I asked somebody to check it with the branch and they++ (I forget who) said it was. | ||
| masak | jonathan: it all sounds to me like there is at least one spectest missing :) | ||
| might have been ihrd. | 16:56 | ||
| ok, I'll see if I can do the same, then. | |||
| jonathan | Ah, it was moritz | 16:57 | |
| moritz++ | |||
| Anyway, if you can reproduce, that'd be nice to have confirmation. | |||
| If you can narrow it down, that's even better. | |||
| Coke | (#parrot is enough) not for those of us that don't care so much about rakudo guts, but we'll get by, I suppose. =-) | ||
| jonathan | Coke: My hacking on Rakudo guts today has already resulted in one fix to Parrot. This isn't unusual. | 16:58 | |
| They're at least somewhat related. :-) | |||
| Coke skips the remainder of the review. | |||
| masak | jonathan: I'm on it. will get back to you once I reach a result of some sort. | 16:59 | |
| jonathan | masak: That's wonderful, thanks for helping. | ||
| dalek | r34031 | jonathan++ | trunk: | 17:01 | |
| : [rakudo] Make substr handle being given a negative start and length. Patch courtesy of Ronald Schmidt <ronaldxs@software-path.com>. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34031 | |||
| Coke | jonathan: (fixing parrot) that's certainly appreciated. And I'm trying to be much more good natured about the grumbling than we used to get in here. =-) | 17:02 | |
| Coke retreats. | 17:03 | ||
| jonathan | Tene/pmichaud: Do we have CATCH blocks to the point that we can close rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58016 - if not, maybe is good to update the ticket with a what's left. | 17:05 | |
| jonathan hopes he didn't irk Coke | 17:06 | ||
| pmichaud: Another possible closable for you go cast your eyes over - rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60732 | 17:08 | ||
| jonathan wants to try and keep the queue clean | |||
| masak | jonathan: aye, I get a Null PMC access when compiling CGI.pm -- maybe you knew this already. | 17:13 | |
| what's worse, since Parrot crashes while compiling, there's a partially-written CGI.pir left in the directory... | 17:14 | ||
| ...and it creates other errors when make is run a second time. | |||
| masak investigates the first error | |||
| jonathan | Ouch. | ||
| masak: How much does CGI.pm depend on? | |||
| masak | jonathan: checking. | 17:15 | |
| it depends on URI.pm | |||
| ...which has no deps. | |||
| so the error, whatever it is, concerns those two files. | |||
| I'll play around a bit with comments and see what I come up with. | 17:16 | ||
| jonathan | Aha, OK. | ||
| So you're saying we can reproduce it with just two files? | |||
| masak | that is what I'm saying, Billy. | ||
| oh -- wait. | 17:17 | ||
| jonathan | OK, that's much more handlable than the whole of November. :-) | ||
| masak | URI.pm does have a dependency, URI/Grammar.pm | ||
| but that one has no deps, honest. | |||
| jonathan | Screw you too, gaz... | ||
| masak | :) | ||
| resuming playing-around-with-comments. | 17:18 | ||
| jonathan | masak: Thanks, much appreciated. | ||
| masak | np. I want to fix this as much as you do. :) | 17:19 | |
| stability and features are good for both our enterprises. | |||
| partial insight #1: if I comment out the URI deps from CGI, the latter compiles. | 17:20 | ||
| ...and so do URI and URI::Grammar. wtf? | 17:21 | ||
| there is also another problem in Dispatcher, it seems. | 17:22 | ||
| Tene | jonathan: 58016 should be closable. | ||
| jonathan | Tene: OK, thanks. | 17:23 | |
| Will close it - we can open more specific tickets for any more specific issues. | |||
| Tene | pmichaud: what would you think of adding a pasttype to PAST::Ops for throwing an exception? Message as first child, severity as second child, type as third child? | ||
| jonathan | Tene++ # CATCH blocks | 17:24 | |
| Tene is going to try to do real work at $realjob today, so won't be around much (hopefully). | 17:25 | ||
|
17:29
chromatic joined
|
|||
| masak | jonathan: gist.github.com/37140 | 17:34 | |
| jonathan | masak: That reproduces it? | 17:35 | |
| masak | aye. | ||
| jonathan | masak: Excellent! | ||
| purl plays air guitar | |||
| jonathan | Out of curiostiy does changing grammar URI::Grammar { | 17:36 | |
| to instead be class URI::Grammar { | |||
| help? | |||
| purl | #perl is not a help channel, and I'm not a help bot. If you want Perl help, try #perl-help or #metallica. or (see the 'help channel' factoid as well) | ||
| masak | jonathan: hold on. | ||
| jonathan | I've got a good idea what this might be if so. | ||
| masak | jonathan: doesn't help. | ||
| jonathan | Ah, OK. | ||
| masak | good hunting. | 17:37 | |
| jonathan | Thanks for such a concise example, I'll be able to work it from here. | ||
| masak++ | |||
| masak | np | ||
| moritz | when I merge ticket A into ticket B, why do I presever A's title and not B's? | ||
| RT-- | 17:38 | ||
| I didn't say "assimilate B" (modulo Bork jokes) | 17:39 | ||
| chromatic | He would have made a good Supreme Court justice. | ||
| jonathan does some work on smartmatch | 17:40 | ||
| moritz restarts feather's apache | 17:43 | ||
| masak orders pizza | |||
|
17:45
Lorn_ joined
|
|||
| pmichaud comments for no specific reason. | 17:49 | ||
| jonathan | pmichaud: You asked about ACCEPTS on Match the other day | 17:50 | |
| I just spotted | |||
| Match Capture | |||
| In the equivalence table. | |||
| If you didn't already see that. | |||
|
17:51
apeiron_ joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | I hadn't seen that particular entry, no. However, TimToady and I discussed the potential for Match ~~ Capture when captures were first being formulated, so it's not surprising to me. | 17:53 | |
| I've basically been doing things as Match isa Capture ever since then | 17:54 | ||
| Tene: ('throw' as pasttype) -- if we really decide we need it, then yes. At least in Rakudo, most throw operations appear to be handled by specific subs for the purpose, so they're just :pasttype('call') nodes. | |||
| Until then I tend to continue to work from the "don't add until there's a clear use case" position for PCT | 17:55 | ||
|
17:56
tomyan left
|
|||
| particle | jonathan: Things people most mistook for the messiah in 2008: (1) Obama. (2) git. | 17:57 | |
| jonathan++ | |||
|
18:07
peters joined,
leto joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | so, anything specific I need to be working on today? | 18:11 | |
|
18:12
jhorwitz joined
|
|||
| jonathan | pmichaud: parameters? ;-) | 18:13 | |
| pmichaud | jonathan: still want me to wait for the rakudoreg merge? ;-) | ||
| jonathan | I don't need them especially though. | ||
|
18:13
Andy joined
|
|||
| jonathan | Oh, yes...that's a good point. | 18:13 | |
| OK, loadinit ;-) | |||
| masak++ has got me a small testcase. | |||
| pmichaud | yes, I'll work on :loadinit. I need to doodle some stuff here on paper to get that worked out, though. | 18:14 | |
| moritz | jonathan: is it in the test suite? | 18:15 | |
| jonathan | moritz: Not yet. | ||
| moritz: gist.github.com/37140 | |||
| If you want to testize it. | |||
| Otherwise I will when I look into it. | 18:16 | ||
| masak | I still haven't checked if it matters whether the modules are in different files. | 18:22 | |
| tewk | I didn't loose it over Obama, but git fits my work model better than centralized source control. | 18:23 | |
| jonathan | masak: They weren't in different files in this case? | ||
| masak | yes, just as you got them | ||
| but I don't know if that's essential. | 18:24 | ||
| jonathan | masak: Then I think that it _should_ fail. | ||
| masak | please explain. | ||
| jonathan | S?? says that you can only use a class keyword without a block once time in a file. | ||
| masak | ah. well, modulo that. | 18:25 | |
| jonathan | Also, I'm not sure if you're in the same file, you would then do "use". | ||
| I thought use was spec'd to go load a file? | |||
| masak | jonathan: modulo that, too. | ||
| jonathan | OK. | ||
| masak | I'm thinking: does the error remain if I put all the classes in the same file (with appropriate changes)? | 18:26 | |
| jonathan | Hang on though, you have all of these in separate files, right? | ||
| Oh, I see! | |||
| masak | my guess is "no" | ||
|
18:26
mberends joined
|
|||
| jonathan | Sorry, I completely misunderstood your point. | 18:26 | |
| masak | I have a feeling this has to do with (1) attributes and (2) use | ||
| but I'll go and be empirical for a while. brb. | |||
| jonathan | I'm quite sure it's to do with use, and it may appear in the attributes case because of the typed attribute. | ||
| has URI ... | 18:27 | ||
| masak | jonathan: everything works when I put all three classes in one file. | 18:29 | |
| jonathan: I get a _different_ error when I combine CGI and URI into one file, and keep URI::Grammar separate | 18:30 | ||
| but we'll handle that later, if needed. | |||
| jonathan | masak: OK, interesting to know. | 18:32 | |
| It's cerainly to do with use. | |||
|
18:32
dngor joined
|
|||
| jonathan | Don't feel a need to hunt further unless you're enjoying it - you've got it down to a much smaller test case already than I had hoped for. :-) | 18:32 | |
| masak | jonathan: I'm not hunting anymore. I'm eating pizza. :) | 18:35 | |
| jonathan | masak: I'm planning to do similar shortly. :-) | ||
| masak | (that said, I'm curious.) | ||
| moritz | hunting is hard, let's eat pizza! | ||
|
18:38
davidfetter joined,
leto joined
|
|||
| jonathan seems to have a working ACCEPTS for arrays. | 18:39 | ||
| Including dwimming on *. | |||
| jonathan looks for tests | |||
| moritz | t/spec/S03-operators/smartmatch.t, "smartmatching lists" | 18:40 | |
| jonathan | yeah | 18:41 | |
| We don't have any yet for the dwimmy stuff, I odn't think | |||
| But I can add that. | |||
| masak | jonathan++ | 18:43 | |
| jonathan unfudges 2, adds 11 new and makes spectest | 18:48 | ||
| In the meantime, it's my turn to go for pizza. | 18:49 | ||
|
18:49
workbench joined
|
|||
| masak | pizza++ | 18:55 | |
| pmichaud | okay, I figured out MAIN and init load stuff. | 18:58 | |
| it's shockingly easy once we get the right formulation. | 18:59 | ||
| moritz | that's always a good sign ;) | ||
| pmichaud | I'll implement it locally, but won't commit until we know where rakudoreg is headed. | 19:00 | |
| PerlJam | moritz: I thought it was a sign of normality. "Now that I know how to do X, X is really easy" ;-) | ||
| masak | maybe good signs are normal. | 19:04 | |
| moritz | maybe normal signs are good. | 19:05 | |
| jonathan: the assign.t failure in rakudoreg worries me a bit - did you look into it? | 19:08 | ||
| pmichaud | assign.t failing in rakudoreg? | 19:22 | |
| moritz | aye | ||
| pmichaud | I'll look. | ||
| moritz | Null PMC access in get_string() | ||
| after test 153 | |||
| pmichaud | those are usually quick to fix. | ||
| (have to rebuild branch...) | |||
| what's the description for test 153? | 19:23 | ||
| masak | pmichaud: it's skipped, so it's hard to tell. | ||
|
19:24
nopaste joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | okaay, I'll just run it. | 19:24 | |
| masak | pmichaud: line 468 and on contain the error. | ||
| pmichaud: my @z = ($a = W, W); | 19:26 | ||
| it's that one. | |||
| W is a sub defined just above in the file. | |||
| pmichaud | maybe we need to define a dummy 'want' function. | 19:27 | |
|
19:27
AndyA joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | let it just return undef. | 19:27 | |
| moritz | pmichaud: or a failed eval() would just have to return something that doesn't make everything bail out | ||
| pmichaud | that too. | ||
| masak | yes, that'd be even better. | ||
| moritz | that would fix another ticket I opened roughly a week ago | 19:28 | |
| pmichaud | testing... | 19:31 | |
| purl | i think testing is Don't use #perl for testing! or experiri vovere est or make tests pass for existing features, fail for unimplemented features and skip for wishlist features | ||
| pmichaud | yes, that fixes it. | ||
| let me clean up eval a bit. | 19:32 | ||
| jonathan | moritz: I have a local patch to fudge the assign.t failures. | 19:34 | |
| pmichaud | cleaning eval also fixes it, though. | ||
| and it needs to be done :-) | |||
| jonathan | OK, that's fine too. | ||
| Please don't throw in a dummy want function. | |||
| pmichaud | why not? | 19:35 | |
| if it returns a failure, that's probably okay. | |||
| jonathan | It'll only confuse people into thinking it should work, ratehr than getting a "sub not found". | ||
| pmichaud | if the failure says "want not implemented", that's even better. | ||
| jonathan | Unless it's the kind of failure that explodes with "want not found". | ||
| OK, that's alright. | |||
| As long as it doesn't silently look like it should be working. | |||
| nopaste | "peters" at 83.183.129.106 pasted "a few grammar tests" (35 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/14997 | 19:36 | |
| masak | peters: hiya. | ||
| peters | Hej masak | ||
| moritz | peters: should I add that to the test suite? | 19:37 | |
| peters | sure =) | 19:38 | |
| peters hopes they are correct | |||
| moritz | they are, if we assume that is() does string comparison | 19:40 | |
| peters | =) | ||
| moritz | but I can easily change them to dtrt in any case | 19:41 | |
| particle | i'm sure /^<...>^/ isn't correct | 19:42 | |
| masak | though it looks nice. :) | 19:43 | |
| sort of like an Asian crab smiley. | |||
| peters | oops, meant ^<..>$ | ||
| moritz | particle: why not? | ||
| pmichaud | ^<...>^ tests that <...> is zero-width :-P | 19:44 | |
| moritz | ;) | ||
| masak | good to know when the first p6 obfu contest takes place. | ||
| pmichaud | r34039 fixes assign.t for me in rakudoreg | ||
| peters | moritz: want me to fix a nopaste? | ||
| jonathan | pmichaud: You comitted it into rakudoreg? | 19:45 | |
| pmichaud | yes. | ||
| jonathan | OK, great. | ||
| moritz | pmichaud: I just commited a fixed version into the pugs repo | ||
| s/pmichaud/peters/ | |||
| peters | thanks | 19:46 | |
|
19:47
DietCoke joined
|
|||
| Coke | commented out code is not boss. | 19:47 | |
|
19:48
nopaste joined
|
|||
| cotto | chromatic, should I change N_BUCKETS or did you want to dig into that more? | 19:48 | |
| kj | Coke: I take it you refer to my commented-out code ? | ||
| Coke | ah, there you are. =-) | ||
| kj | ... still working on that | ||
| Coke | Yup. | ||
| hokay | |||
| kj | I'm 99.99999999% sure it's ok, but still testing with a fresh check out | ||
| will remove it shortly | 19:49 | ||
| Coke: is there an RSS feed for commits? I'm looking at parrotvm.org/svn/parrot, but thelink to rss is broken | 19:51 | ||
| moritz | svn.perl.org/rss/log/parrot.rss | 19:53 | |
| purl, parrot svn rss is svn.perl.org/rss/log/parrot.rss | |||
| purl | OK, moritz. | ||
| cotto | moritz, you should put that on the wiki. | ||
| kj | moritz: thanks! | 19:54 | |
| pmichaud | my desktop keyboard just died :-( | 19:55 | |
| (and mouse, too) | |||
| chromatic will be a few minutes late | |||
| peters | moritz: nopaste.snit.ch/14998 | 19:56 | |
| moritz | cotto: any suggetion on which page? | ||
| cotto | WhereIsIt | ||
| moritz | peters: do you have a commit bit for the pugs repo? | ||
| peters | moritz: nope | 19:57 | |
| kj | moritz: I'd say on developers? | ||
| moritz | peters: we should change that. Just /msg me your desired nick name and your email address, and you can get one in a few minutes | ||
| WhereIsIt is good | |||
| Whiteknight | is dalek busted? | ||
| I've committed a few things, and he hasn't mentioned any of them | 19:58 | ||
| cotto | dalek-- | ||
| jonathan | Hmm, nor my last few commits. | ||
| I WANT MY KARMA!!! | |||
| ;-) | |||
| Whiteknight | jonathan++ | 19:59 | |
| cotto | karma++ | ||
| masak | jonathan-- # greed :P | ||
| pmichaud | jonathan++ # on loan for 0.00-0.25 % interest | ||
| cotto | karma karma | ||
| purl | karma has karma of 58 | ||
| PerlJam | jonathan-- (you didn't say which kind of karma) | ||
| Whiteknight | That's escrowed karma, I'll take it back when dalek comes back | ||
| volatile int jonathans_karma; ... | 20:00 | ||
| jonathan | ...well that was all a bit of a no-op... | ||
| masak | jonathan: be glad for that :) | ||
| jonathan | masak: Be glad I'm closing 2 of your tickets. ;-) | ||
| pmichaud | except for the side effect that we all now you to be a greedy karma person. :-) | ||
| masak | jonathan: I am, look: \\o/ | ||
| pmichaud | *now know | ||
| grrr | |||
| jonathan | Like that's news...why else do you think I commit so much? | ||
| pmichaud blames his non-functioning keyboard. | |||
| TimToady | phone? | 20:01 | |
| purl | phone is always interrupting | ||
| pmichaud | phone | ||
| masak | purl: forget phone | 20:05 | |
| purl | masak, I didn't have anything matching phone | ||
| masak | purl: liar. | ||
| purl | No, purl is lying!! | ||
| moritz | I've added a section "Source Code" to trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/WhereIsIt now | 20:06 | |
| pmichaud | it looks like my usb ports on my desktop died. :-( | ||
| jonathan | :-( | 20:07 | |
| pmichaud | that does make troubleshooting difficult :-( | ||
| jonathan | Reboot doesn't fix it? | ||
| pmichaud | no. | ||
| jonathan | Oh, wait, you don't run windows... | ||
| pmichaud | I think it's hardware failure. | ||
| jonathan | Ouch. USB port failure implies m/b fail. | ||
| pmichaud | correct. | ||
| jonathan | Which is one of the most annoying things to have to replace. :-( | ||
| cotto | moritz++ | 20:08 | |
| PerlJam | pm: it's so cold that the solder shrank. Just warm it up a bit :) | 20:09 | |
| cotto | Does Parrot have a way to get entropy from the system? | 20:10 | |
| jonathan | (whispering so masak can't here) Rakudo RT is down to 163 tickets. | 20:11 | |
| masak | someone say anything? I thought I heard something... | ||
| jonathan | Nothing at all! | ||
| purl | well, nothing at all is in core. or what stupid sexy flanders says | ||
| masak | purl: every day, you make less and less sense. | 20:12 | |
| purl | masak: huh? | ||
| cotto | masak, not a simpsons fan? | 20:14 | |
| Coke | flanders? | ||
| purl | flanders is dead. So is Swann. More's the pitty. | ||
| Coke | simpsons? | ||
| purl | simpsons is, like, xrl.us/2doe | ||
| masak | cotto: I know who Flanders is, but I fail to see the connection with what purl said. | ||
| chromatic | He had a field. | 20:15 | |
| Coke | forget simpsons | ||
| purl | Coke: I forgot simpsons | ||
| Coke has missed the perl6 meeting again. | |||
| pmichaud | Coke: you haven't _missed_ it completely. | 20:17 | |
|
20:19
iblechbot joined
|
|||
| Coke | willen have on missed it. | 20:21 | |
| Coke has nothing perl6ian to report. | 20:24 | ||
| chromatic | willen haven | 20:26 | |
| Coke did try to find a web reference to the grammar, but was stymied. | |||
| chromatic++ | 20:27 | ||
| Whiteknight | dalek-- | 20:29 | |
| Tene | I wondered why nobody had been committing. | 20:30 | |
| cotto | chromatic, should I change N_BUCKETS or did you want to dig into that more? | 20:33 | |
|
20:33
gryphon joined
|
|||
| Coke asks again if we should investigate a hash library. | 20:34 | ||
| perhaps mhash? | |||
| jonathan | Didn't google have a super-low-overhead hash? | ||
| It's another option maybe. | |||
| Coke | goog-sparsehash.sourceforge.net/ ? | 20:35 | |
| er, code.google.com/p/google-sparsehash/ | |||
| jonathan | "An extremely memory-efficient hash_map implementation, with only 2 bits/entry overhead." | ||
| Sounds like it. | |||
| purl | Sounds like it. is it also delicious? | ||
| Coke | looks like that's C++ | ||
| jonathan | Oh, is it C++... :-( | 20:36 | |
| Damm. Well, maybe useful for ideas, but not good if we want something we cna Just Use. | 20:37 | ||
| Coke | I just want something we can use. | ||
| GeJ | Good morning everyone | ||
| Coke | jonathan: created a TT for it. | 20:42 | |
| TT? | |||
| purl | TT is (: Template Toolkit) | ||
| Coke | TT is also Trac Ticket | ||
| purl | okay, Coke. | ||
| pmichaud starts to investigate what has happened to his desktop :-( | 20:44 | ||
| chromatic | Weasels. | ||
| purl | weasels are *expensive* | ||
| chromatic | cotto, go ahead. | ||
| pmichaud | actually, probably rabbits in this neighborhood. Or maybe mice. | 20:45 | |
| chromatic | I've been thinking today that we should cut out all of the really smart really fast we know this has to be super optimized clever parts of hash.c and make a simple hash and only then profile it and worry about speed. | ||
| The fact that the bucket allocation code is impenetrable and, as far as I know, could never work correctly in all cases damns it even slightly. | 20:46 | ||
| pmichaud | I would not be adverse to that. | 20:47 | |
| Coke | chromatic: is it worth doing that rather than just dumping the whole thing if we can go with a portable-enough library? | ||
| pmichaud | the fact that the various "-g bugs" all seem to involve keys and key lookups makes me wonder if it's hash related. | ||
| mberends | chromatic: "premature optimization is the root of all evil" C.A.R. Hoare, and D. Knuth | ||
| Coke | I would really like us to not reinvent so many wheels. | ||
| pmichaud | that would be consistent with what I've observed, anyway. | ||
| chromatic | Coke --> Allison | ||
| Coke | chromatic: if 3rd party library is problematic, undoing undocumented speed hacks++. | 20:48 | |
| chromatic | I'd love to dump a lot of that code and absorb a license-compatible file or two, but I've never managed to convince her of that. | ||
| pmichaud, you may have missed last night how I said that keys are one of my top four least favorite parts of Parrot's source code. | 20:49 | ||
| allison | absorbing files from other projects is a world of pain | ||
| Coke | we just don't have enough cycles to do everything ourselves. | ||
| particle | cerberus is a car whore | ||
| allison | making certain external libraries a build requirement, though is fine | ||
| chromatic | Cerberus is still Pope. | ||
| allison | we already do it with ICU | ||
| chromatic | That's 'cuz you can't just drop ICU into your source tree. | ||
| Coke | ... we tried that. it kind of worked. | 20:50 | |
| allison | (we just need an intelligent default for cases where the library isn't available) | ||
| Coke | I'd rather depend on a library than not. | ||
| particle | icu isn't a requirement | ||
| it's optional | |||
| Coke | particle: it is if you want to do anything serious with unicode. | ||
| which we claim to support. | |||
| allison | particle: right, external libraries always need a fallback | ||
| NotFound | Are we inventing the optional requirement? ;) | ||
| Coke | it's not required for "one wing" parrot. | ||
| clipped. =-) | 20:51 | ||
| particle | let's call it the american parrot. | ||
| brooklyn parrot? they exist. | |||
| Coke | allison: when is the library not available? | ||
| (for, say, a 3rd party library that we know compiles on all our platforms) | |||
| s/platforms/core platforms/ | |||
| any time we have to roll our own default, we might as well just ditch the 3rd party library entirely. | 20:52 | ||
| chromatic | o/~ It's the American Way o/~ | ||
| NotFound | The default for no icu is that a lot of things doesn't work. I don't think this will be a reasonable default for hashes. | 20:53 | |
| Coke | NotFound: true. | 20:54 | |
| chromatic | Hashes may be tricky though, because we do a lot of things with them; sometimes their keys or values need marking during GC. | ||
| allison | Coke: that is what we decided before, but there still could be value in using an external library | 20:55 | |
| Coke | I think it would probably increase our support burden if we had our version and an external library. | ||
| but, again, if we assume that we have a library that works on all our core platforms (which I mentioned in the ticket), we don't need a fallback. Do we? | 20:56 | ||
| (and if so, why?) | |||
| NotFound | We can put a linear search as fallback, as a subtle motivation to install the library ;) | 20:57 | |
| tewk | NotFound: for small hashes that may be faster :) | 20:58 | |
| chromatic | I'm not sure we don't have a linear search in some cases now. | ||
| allison | Coke: it depends on the library, and how many platforms it's supported on | ||
| NotFound | tewk: ugh, that defeats the purpose | ||
| PerlJam | are we assuming compatible licensing for these hypothetical 3rd party libs? | 20:59 | |
| allison | Coke: the big three we're targeting for 1.0 is not enough | ||
| Coke | allison: why not? | ||
| chromatic | Because the world is not enough! | ||
| kj | sounds like another James Bond movie | ||
| allison | Coke: because people need a sane way of porting Parrot to other platforms, and telling them "you have to reimplement the hashing algorithm" isn't an option | ||
| chromatic | Yeah, but telling people "We have an amazing virtual machine with wonderful features" and having them say "You don't know how to write a hash; WTF?" is kind of embarrassing. | 21:00 | |
| Coke | We only have so many resources available to us: we already didn't meet all the goals for the first post-PDS release. I'm not sure that having us write more code is a viable option. | ||
| allison | we're talking in hypotheticals here | 21:01 | |
| Whiteknight | How much work is it going to reasonably take to write a good hashing algorithm? | ||
| allison | put together a list of available external hash libraries and we can evaluate which will or won't work | ||
| chromatic | Depends if you're a mathemetician. | ||
| allison | and what the cost/benefit trade off for each is | ||
| Coke | allison: I'm trying to find out if it's even worth it. Sounds like not. | ||
| Whiteknight | howabout mathemagician? | ||
| chromatic | No; they always trigger division by zero exceptions. | ||
| allison | Coke: oh, it's absolutely worth investigating | ||
| Coke | that's certainly not the impression I was getting. =-) | 21:02 | |
|
21:02
Lorn joined
|
|||
| allison | I'm outlining the parameters of what we would need from an external library, not shooting the idea down | 21:02 | |
| Coke | If we always need to write a fallback, it's not worth pursuing, IMO. | 21:03 | |
| kj | I don't think the amount of code is the only concern; it's what kind of code. A hashing algorithm shouldn't be too hard? | ||
| chromatic | At the very least, anyone who's done basic research into hash algorithms can look at ours and say "Don't you know that your bucket count should be a prime number, and definitely not a power of two?" | ||
| PerlJam | Coke: getting something working and correct that will be replaced later makes it not worth it? | ||
| chromatic | ... which suddenly clarifies N_BUCKETS, even though it's used consistently wrong. | ||
| allison | a very simple hashing algorithm is a fine fallback, but not what we'd want to use most of the time | 21:04 | |
| tewk | a secure hashing algorithm is non trivial | ||
| Whiteknight | if we had a good general hashing API, we could write any number of ever em-bettering backends for it | ||
| jonathan | That's a completely different thing. | ||
| Coke | I think my point is either misunderstood or disagreed with. | ||
| jonathan | (secure hashing...) | ||
| NotFound | If we want to have something working and correct without much effort, maybe the linear search is not such a bad idea. | ||
| allison | Coke: possibly both, it's true that I don't see the problem | 21:05 | |
| Coke | PerlJam: what? | ||
| kj | linear search is in fact not that bad. I did some experiments, and I had to add like 2000 strings (or was it 15000? either case, big number) to my symbol tables before hashtables started to be faster | ||
| chromatic | Or an ordered heap.... | 21:06 | |
| Whiteknight | i have to go. later | ||
| chromatic | But you have to account for the comparison overhead. | ||
| NotFound | kj: c strings, parrot strings, or both? | ||
| chromatic | And the fact that our hashes are polymorphic. | ||
| kj | NotFound: i was doing C strings | ||
| PerlJam | Coke: it sounded like you think it's not worth investigating other mechanisms if they are going to be replaced at some point. | ||
| allison | linear search is a perfectly reasonable fallback, ordered heap may be more complex than needed but may work | 21:07 | |
| kj | I was really quite dissappointed. | ||
| PerlJam | I'm only paying about 40% attention, so if I'm wrong just ignore me :) | ||
| jonathan | kj: That suggests our hashing may be rather broken... :-S | ||
| Or at least inefficient. | 21:08 | ||
| tewk | jonathan: I ment in DDOS senarios, bad hash algorithms can lead to long runtimes. | ||
| jonathan | Ah, OK. | ||
| I thought you meant like, SHA-1 | |||
| kj | jonathan: it was PIRCs hashing algorithm, which I stole from IMCC. Yes, it may be bad, but it could be easily fixed (very local code) | 21:09 | |
| jonathan | kj: Ah, OK, I thought you were using Parrot hashes. | ||
| It may be worth a benchmark on those against arrays. | |||
| We use hashes all over the place, though. | |||
| I expect we're quite sensitive to hash performance. | 21:10 | ||
| pmichaud | I'm sensitive to hash bugs, for sure. :-) | ||
| PerlJam | too bad we don't have any profiling tools ;) | ||
| pmichaud | (cleaning the motherboard with compressed air seems to have restored my usb ports. Well, at least the keyboard. And I haven't plugged in any other usb devices.) | 21:11 | |
| chromatic | Some 5% of runtime for "Hello, world!" in PIR hits hash code. | ||
| pmichaud | (so, at least it doesn't appear that I need a new motherboard yet.) | 21:12 | |
| jonathan | compressed air FTW | ||
| allison | PerlJam: I think Coke meant that if we spend the effort on implementing a hashing algorithm for a fallback, then it seems a waste to also spend it on linking in an external one | ||
| chromatic | Hm, and some 8% of runtime in the Rakduo building benchmark hits hashes. | ||
| NotFound | Motherboards are like humans, sometimes they just need some fresh air. | ||
| chromatic | Wait, no. Closer to 16%. | 21:13 | |
| jonathan | Wow. | ||
| chromatic | Maybe 18%. | ||
| kj | can't we just use the hashing algorithm in the Dragon book? | ||
| jonathan | Is that the time we spend insice the hash code? | ||
| allison | PerlJam: but, I suspect there's a huge difference in effort between maintaining a fully optimized hash algorithm, and maintaining a light simple one as a fallback | ||
| kj | that was written by the Experts :-) | ||
| Coke | partcl is closer to 25%, IIRC. | 21:14 | |
| PerlJam | kj: Knuth didn't write the dragon book ;) | ||
| allison: right. | |||
| purl | i heard right. was there any chance you could get the fixes into branch? | ||
| chromatic | Let's figure a rule of thumb for 20% of time in the hash code. | ||
| Coke | PerlJam: given our new release driven psyche, yes, I want to minimize the amount of time spent coding things that don't get us 1.0 | ||
| kj | PerlJam: right, but it was either Aho, Sethi or Ullman, all of which I trust to be smart enough | ||
| allison | chromatic: which makes it a big target for a speedup | ||
| Coke | (including experimental code) | ||
| pmichaud | PGE heavily depends on hashes. | ||
| chromatic | Fixing the N_BUCKETS fiasco might help. | ||
| pmichaud | so do named arguments. | 21:15 | |
| so anything doing parsing and/or method calls ends up doing a lot of hash work. | |||
| Coke wonders where his partcl commit messages are. | |||
| chromatic | If we can get a prime number (or at least a non-power-of-two number) of keys per hash, that might help. | ||
| PerlJam | what's wrong with using Perl 5's algorithm? | ||
| chromatic | This is pretty close. | 21:16 | |
| Coke | kj++ # deprecation updates | ||
| kj | Coke++ # setting a Good Example | 21:17 | |
| Coke | can someone do partcl a favor and test code.google.com/p/partcl/wiki/PartclSource "For users" ? | ||
| pmichaud | rakudo: say 'pmichaud', '++', ' # trying to keep ahead of jonathan++'; | ||
| Coke | after that, 'make test' should mostly work in partcl. | ||
| polyglotbot | OUTPUT[pmichaud++ # trying to keep ahead of jonathan++ā¤] | ||
| PerlJam changes INITIAL_BUCKETS to 37 in his copy of parrot :) | |||
| allison | Coke: (re: 1.0) that's fair, and really I have doubts whether we'll find an external library that's flexible enough to fit our use case (though I'd love it if that were proven wrong) | 21:18 | |
| particle | who's the perl 5 hash king? | ||
| Coke | *fffffffp* whaaaat? | ||
| jonathan | pmichaud: I'm getting sleepy now, use it to your advantage! | 21:19 | |
| moritz | does the hash king do hashing? *SCNR* | ||
| pmichaud | jonathan: what's the story on rakudoreg? Do I need to still hold off on other stuff, or do it in a separate branch? | ||
| NotFound | Coke: svn: URL 'partcl.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/branches/stable' doesn't exist | ||
| Coke sees that extjs has changed their licensing starting with 2.1 to something too invasive and talks to his boss about buying a commercial license. | |||
| NotFound: ... s/\\/trunk// | |||
| fixing the wiki. | |||
| jonathan | pmichaud: I will look at the bug with the November stuff tomorrow. | 21:20 | |
| masak++ got it down to a small test case | |||
| pmichaud | okay. Much of the stuff I'm wanting to do kinda blocks on that. :-( | ||
| jonathan | So it's either (a) going to be easy to find and fix or (b) mean I've screwed up something bad. | ||
| Ah. | |||
| pmichaud | where's the test case...maybe I can take a crack at it? | ||
| jonathan | Are you expecting conflicts? | ||
| pmichaud | well, if I'm changing loadinit stuff... maybe. | ||
| Coke | NotFound++ #wiki updated. | ||
| pmichaud | or if I'm working on parameters... likely. | 21:21 | |
| jonathan | OK. | ||
| Let me make a cup of tea, and then let's look at the november bug. | |||
| erm, bug that breaks november ;-) | |||
| First step is sync branch with what's in trunk. | |||
| Coke | allison: regarding the stable branch on tcl, I'll probably just rm the branch and recreate it whenever a new release that works with trunk HEAD comes out. | ||
| (rather than do any serious merging between the two.) | 21:22 | ||
| NotFound | Coke: builds find with parrot trunk | ||
| s/find/fine | |||
| pmichaud | I don't have svn 1.5, so you might need to do the sync step. | ||
| moritz | pmichaud: gist.github.com/37140 | ||
| Coke | NotFound: it will fail at runtime. | ||
| allison | Coke: seems sensible | ||
| Coke | (as it tries to use ParrotIO) | ||
| jonathan | pmichaud: Just starting it now. | ||
| Coke | NotFound: try "make test" ... | ||
| jonathan | The bug...oh, mortiz' link :-) | ||
| Coke | (partcl's trunk should run, mostly, against parrot's trunk.) | 21:23 | |
| moritz | Coke: tried the instructions on the wiki... | ||
| svn: URL 'partcl.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/branches/stable' doesn't exist | |||
| NotFound | Coke: lots of fails... | ||
| Coke | moritz: please refresh. that was reported at about 4 minutes ago. | ||
| NotFound: didn't I just say that? | |||
| (against trunk I expect everything to fail. that's why the instructures say to try against parrot 0.8.1 | 21:24 | ||
| NotFound | Coke: just confirming ;) | ||
| Coke | er, "instructions" | ||
| NotFound++ | |||
| moritz | Coke: ok, works | ||
| Coke | moritz: does "make test" work in languges/tcl after that? | 21:25 | |
| moritz | Coke: that's still running | 21:26 | |
| Coke | any failures yet? | ||
| (if not, it's probably fine.) | |||
| moritz | t/cmd_lsort...................... Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) All 22 subtests passed | ||
| attempt to access code outside of current code segment | 21:27 | ||
| Coke | yup. | ||
| pmichaud | okay, trying moritz's example in rakudoreg, I currently get | ||
| Null PMC access in getprop() | |||
| current instr.: 'anon' pc 108 (EVAL_16:49) | |||
| called from Sub 'parrot;Perl6;Grammar;typename' pc 94550 (src/gen_grammar.pir:28963) | |||
| does that sound right? | |||
| Coke | moritz++ | 21:28 | |
| moritz | Coke: apart from that, everything fine | ||
| Coke | moritz: I just updated code.google.com/p/partcl/wiki/TestingPartc to mention that. | ||
| jonathan | pmichaud: I think that's consistent. | ||
| pmichaud | okay. I'm not doing anything pre-compiled yet, just running CGI.pm straight from source. | ||
| jonathan | pmichaud: OK. | 21:29 | |
| Apparently pre-compiled sometimes worked. | |||
| pmichaud | why 'getprop'? | ||
| afair, actions.pm doesn't actually use getprop for anything. | |||
| jonathan | It's not in an action. | 21:30 | |
| OK, just done sync'ing | |||
| Getting a clean build. | |||
| pmichaud | oh, you're right, it's in the grammar. | ||
| I think that should go in an action. | 21:31 | ||
| jonathan | What should? | 21:32 | |
| purl | A perfect world should never need "should". | ||
| pmichaud | the <?{{ ... }}> assertion | ||
| jonathan | It affects the match. | ||
| pmichaud | that's okay, we can make that happen. | ||
| jonathan | Let's try and fix the bug. We can refactor later. | 21:33 | |
| pmichaud | I'm not a big fan of "refactor later" -- that's how we end up in these messes in a lot of cases. | ||
| Coke | I recommend we remove compilers/imcc/Changelog | ||
| (it's a holdover from when imcc wasn't core.) | |||
| pmichaud | that said, we can figure out the bug, yes. | ||
| kj | Coke: +1 | ||
| purl | 1 | ||
| Coke | kj: I'm heading out. feel free to grab some karma. =-) | ||
| -> | 21:34 | ||
| jonathan | I don't see what moving the code to an action, even if there's an easy way to do it, would achieve. | ||
| kj | Coke: oki | ||
| jonathan | (I am curious how you do it though.) | ||
| pmichaud | right now we're taking something that should be <?{ $c.is_type(...) }> and turning it into a huge amount of PIR code. | 21:35 | |
| PacoLinux | Coke: make test seems to hang for me in : t/cmd_break....................1/4 | ||
| pmichaud | the grammar should not be so long. | ||
| anyway | 21:36 | ||
| $P0 = getprop 'enum', $P0 | |||
| is that the getprop that's giving us an issue? | |||
| jonathan | I think it's the only one in there. | ||
| pmichaud | $P0 gets set by the 'class' opcode. I didn't think there was an official 'class' opcode. | 21:37 | |
| jonathan wants to clear these tests up and have us just checking for does Abstraction eventually. | |||
| NotFound | Coke: fine with 0.8.1, just the cmd_lsort fail. | ||
| jonathan | pmichaud: There is, it maps to get_class vtable. | ||
| pmichaud | I've been using typeof | ||
| PacoLinux | Coke: i'm testing with trunk, not 0.8.1, sorry .. | 21:38 | |
| jonathan | Does that return a PMC? | ||
| I thought it only gave string and int back... | |||
| pmichaud | yes. | ||
| $P0 = typeof $P1 # gets class of $P1 | |||
| jonathan | Oh. | ||
| pmichaud | obviously 'class' is somehow returning PMCNULL, though | ||
| jonathan | Ah. | 21:40 | |
| You know, it doesn't complain here. | |||
| svn up | |||
| pmichaud | okay, trying again after svn up. | ||
| jonathan | I think the grammar namespacing stuff (which Chris Dolan's patch fixed) might have been putting stuff int he wrong place. | ||
| pmichaud | yes, that would make sense. | 21:41 | |
| jonathan | oh, argh! | ||
| I ran the wrong thing! | |||
| Ignore that. | |||
| pmichaud | I still needed the svn up. | 21:42 | |
| jonathan | Well, svn up anyway so we're debugging the same code. | ||
| pmichaud | realclean and rebuild now. | ||
| jonathan | I did one, yes. | ||
| pmichaud | (realcleaning and rebuilding now) | ||
| jonathan | Just in case. | ||
| purl | Break glass, retrieve shotgun. | ||
| pmichaud | looks like 'class' and 'typeof' do the same thing. | 21:43 | |
| (checked while waiting for rebuild :-) | |||
| jonathan | heh | ||
| Typical. :-) | |||
| pmichaud | I think allison once said that 'class' was going away, so use 'typeof' instead. | 21:44 | |
| jonathan | OK | ||
| pmichaud | but I'm not sure about that. We can add it to our "deprecation?" list. | ||
| jonathan | I didn't know typeof handed back a PMC too. | ||
| allison | jonathan: that was a new addition | ||
| jonathan | Well, it'd make sense to have one opcode that does it, not two doing the same thing. :-) | ||
| allison: Ah, OK. | |||
| I'm happy to see class deprecated if typeof lets us get the class. | 21:45 | ||
| pmichaud: Changing has URI $.uri; to has $.uri clears it up | |||
| pmichaud | jonathan: so, do we just tell november to not type-qualify their attributes? | 21:46 | |
| jonathan | No | ||
| That sucks. :-) | |||
| pmichaud | it wouldn't bother me, if it meant we could merge. | ||
| jonathan | Also commenting out use URI::Grammar; in the other file helps. | ||
| (One change or the other.) | |||
| tewk | long_running_branches-- | 21:47 | |
| pmichaud | okay, still building | ||
| so far this branch is pretty short | |||
| like, 24 hours, I think. :-) | |||
| tewk | shorter the better :) | ||
| pmichaud | (Trac) maybe someone with some Trac-fu could fix trac.parrot.org/parrot/report/3 so that tickets not related to any milestone don't appear in the output? | 21:48 | |
| or at the bottom? it seems weird that they are at the top, when asking for "active tickets by milestone" | |||
| jonathan | pmichaud: OK, big clue. | ||
| pmichaud: If URI.pm is | 21:49 | ||
| class URI; | |||
| use URI::Grammar; | |||
| pmichaud | after svn up, rebuild, I still get the 'getprop' error. | ||
| jonathan | It fails. If, however, it is | ||
| use URI::Grammar; | |||
| class URI; | |||
| Then it works. | |||
| pmichaud | well, the second version isn't valid Perl 6, I don't think. | 21:50 | |
| jonathan | Oh? | ||
| Ah, becuase it needs to be the first statement in the file... | |||
| pmichaud | correct. | ||
| See the beginning of S11. | |||
| (we don't check for that at the moment.) | 21:51 | ||
| yes, I still get the same error message | |||
| Null PMC access in getprop | |||
| jonathan | thinking... | 21:52 | |
| purl | www.terrybisson.com/meat.html | ||
| pmichaud | oddly, -t1 doesn't show that getprop instruction. | ||
| jonathan | pmichaud: Got an idea it's to do with the cleanup stuff. | 21:54 | |
| Let me try a couple of things. | |||
| chromatic | cotto, I'm not sure N_BUCKETS is wrong anymore. | ||
| pmichaud | we decided yesterday that we didn't need the cleanup stuff, yes? | ||
| or that "we shouldn't need" it | |||
| jonathan | Yes | 21:55 | |
| The latter. | |||
| purl | or batter or letter or butter | ||
| pmichaud | where is the cleanup stuff? | ||
| nm, found it | |||
| jonathan | pmichaud: See esp the bit in use_statement | 21:57 | |
| Which I fear may be guilty. | |||
| pmichaud | I really would prefer to eliminate @?UNDER_CONSTRUCTION | 21:59 | |
| jonathan | comment out line 121 to see what happens without it | ||
| If we can fix that, we can probably do away with it. | 22:00 | ||
| pmichaud | what should I expect to see (while I'm waiting for compile to finish) | ||
| jonathan | oh, uh, comment out the whole loop | 22:01 | |
| :-) | |||
| Otherwise you sit in an infinite loop | |||
| pmichaud | I did comment out the loop. | ||
| jonathan | Guess who forgot. | ||
| ;-) | |||
| pmichaud | when trying to run CGI.pm, I get Null PMC access in isa() | ||
| is that what I should see? | |||
| masak | that sounds like the second error I found. | ||
| the one I never discussed with jonathan. | 22:02 | ||
| jonathan | That isn't exactly what I was getting before - I saw stuff going on in protoobject. | ||
| pmichaud | nopasting backtrace | ||
| jonathan | pmichaud: If we're going to debug the problem that makes us need the cleanup at the moment, I suggest a smaller example. | 22:03 | |
| class A { }; A.new | |||
| That will do it. | |||
| nopaste | "pmichaud" at 72.181.176.220 pasted "backtrace after commenting out @UNDER_CONSTRUCTION" (46 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/15002 | ||
| pmichaud | yes, that's much easier. | ||
| cotto | chromatic, how so? | 22:04 | |
| jonathan | pmichaud: Yes. Note it's curious where it occurs in the PIR. | 22:05 | |
| There isn't an isa instruction there | |||
| pmichaud | how do you know? | ||
| jonathan | Add --target=pir | ||
| Line 5 of that is capture_lex | 22:06 | ||
| get_hll_global $P26, ["A"], "_block25" | |||
| capture_lex $P26 | |||
| pmichaud | capture_lex calls VTABLE_isa | ||
| chromatic | cotto, it creates only 3/4 as many Buckets as there are slots in the Bucket array. | ||
| cotto | right | ||
| jonathan | I'm guessing that us installing an A at compile time, messes up somehow the creation of the nested namespace. | ||
| chromatic | The problem is that OrderedHash's clone thinks that there are as many buckets as the value of hash->mask, which isn't true. | 22:07 | |
| jonathan | Of course, if we do it afterwards (for the proto) it works and we can have both. :-S | ||
| chromatic | hash->mask represents the offset for the slots in the Bucket array. | ||
| If you use that as the offset for the Buckets themselves, you'll walk into the Bucket array 3/4 of the way through. | |||
| pmichaud | I thought I had tested that installing an A didn't mess up later namespaces. | ||
| let me check. | |||
| chromatic | That's why the 13th bucket always gets weirdness in it. | ||
| cotto | that makes sense | 22:08 | |
| chromatic | OrderedHash's clone thus does the wrong thing. | ||
| masak | the 13th bucket. good name for a band. | ||
| nopaste | "pmichaud" at 72.181.176.220 pasted "namespace management with protos" (17 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/15003 | 22:09 | |
| jonathan | pmichaud: Hmm. So it's not that simple. | 22:10 | |
| pmichaud | it may actually be simpler -- I just don't think that's it. :-) | ||
|
22:11
Theory joined
|
|||
| cotto | So the fix would be to make OrderedHash only use <= 3/4*hash->mask+1 buckets (i.e. 1/2*hash->mask+1)? | 22:11 | |
| chromatic | Yeah, something like that. | 22:12 | |
| purl | yeah, something like that is what I'd do as well | ||
| jonathan | pmichaud: It is something to do with what we leave behind in the ns though | ||
| cotto | I'll see if that works. | ||
| chromatic | for (i = 0; i <= ((hash->mask - 1) * 3 / 4); i++) { | ||
| pmichaud | okay, I'll try another test. | 22:13 | |
| just a sec. | |||
| jonathan | If you take the PIR that --target=pir spits out, save it to a file, and run that file, it works. | ||
| nopaste | "pmichaud" at 72.181.176.220 pasted "namespace management with protos, #2" (20 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/15004 | 22:14 | |
| jonathan | pmichaud: Hmm | 22:15 | |
| What about if you put an UnderConstructionProto in the NS first? | |||
| Rather than a new class? | |||
| pmichaud | I agree that for some reason the @UNDER_CONSTRUCTION is cleaning it up. | 22:16 | |
| chromatic | cotto, all tests pass for me. | ||
| pmichaud | but here's the thing... | ||
| by the time you clean up @UNDER_CONSTRUCTION, shouldn't the construction proto already be gone anyway? | |||
| I mean, wouldn't it have already been replaced by the protoobject for A? | |||
| jonathan | No, because at that point we have not yet run the code that makes the proto-object. | ||
| cotto | I don't like how that makes OrderedHash depend on Hash's internals, but it seems to solve the problem. | ||
| jonathan | We run that as we're leaving the parser | ||
| pmichaud | which parser? the nested one? | 22:17 | |
| jonathan | Well, the nested one should only clean up the UnderConstructionProtos that it created. | ||
| chromatic | OH jumped that shark years ago. | ||
| jonathan | My suspicion is that it was maybe being overzealous. | ||
| cotto | Yeah, it did. | 22:18 | |
| too many broken windows already | |||
| pmichaud | okay. Here's what I'd like to propose, which you're welcome to veto. | ||
| chromatic | We should pull some of this code into src/hash.c someday. | ||
| pmichaud | Earlier today I figured out how main, load, and init should work. | 22:19 | |
| chromatic | Did you have a failing test case which this fixes? | ||
| pmichaud | It's *much* cleaner than what we're doing now. | ||
| I suspect the problem we're seeing has to do with the convoluted way we're handling main/load/init now. | |||
| jonathan | It may well be an ordering problem, or some other effect of that, yes. | ||
| cotto | The clone fix makes a test pass which failed otherwise, but also passed when N_BUCKETS was an identity macro. | ||
| jonathan | You pondering doing your changes/cleanups in this branch too? | ||
| cotto | I think that means yes. | ||
| pmichaud | I'd like to go ahead and fix main/load/init tonight. I can do it in a branch, or in trunk, your preference. | ||
| I'd rather do it separate from this branch. | 22:20 | ||
| jonathan | Is there any reason not to do it in...ah, ok | ||
| chromatic | Which test was that? | ||
| jonathan | It would avoid conflicts. | ||
| pmichaud | because otherwise I don't know if it's this branch or my changes that are causing things to fail. | ||
| cotto | the clone test in OrderedHash | ||
| jonathan | True. | ||
| cotto | t/pmc/orderedhash.t | ||
| pmichaud | then I'd like to see if we can re-generate the type checking from that new branch. | ||
| jonathan | I don't think there would be that much merge conflicts. | ||
| pmichaud | it didn't take too long to get typechecking to work in the first place, and we know where the pitfalls are likely to be. | 22:21 | |
| chromatic | I didn't have any failures there. Interesting. | ||
| cotto | (it failed when the hash seed was 3794, although it worked fine with 3793) | ||
| pmichaud | but then at least we'll know that it's not an ordering issue. | ||
| jonathan | True. | ||
| cotto | It seemed to be the only test that couldn't deal with a fixed random hash seed. | ||
| pmichaud | I'll also draft a version of what I think the "is this a type" code should look like, to get rid of the long assertion. | 22:22 | |
| (it won't go in an action method.) | |||
| (well, it might, but it'll be very obvious how it works.) | |||
| jonathan | Essentially, moving what's there now to something we call from the grammar rule instead? | ||
| pmichaud | yes. | ||
| jonathan | OK, that's fine. | ||
| If you set about trying to shorten it down to the .does(Abstraction) test I want it to end up being on the thing that's in the NS, that'll probably make the branch take a while longer. :-) | 22:23 | ||
| pmichaud | then once load/init/main are fixed up, let's look at 'use' again. | ||
| chromatic | How do I file a new TT from email? | ||
| Tene | I don't think you can yet. | 22:24 | |
| pmichaud | I'm thinking a lot of things will clear up. | ||
| and this would happen tonight, literally. | |||
| chromatic | Gah. | ||
|
22:24
Whiteknight joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | so that you could pick it back up again tomorrow. | 22:24 | |
| jonathan | (The point was to get the type registry in and clear up things in a bunch of smaller refactors, as I review them, make them work in the nested case, and so forth.) | ||
|
22:25
Theory joined
|
|||
| jonathan | I didn't want a long drawn out branch, and I did want to get type registry stuff in early, so we can get plenty of feedback before the next release. | 22:25 | |
| pmichaud | I'm still thinking it can happen in the next day or two. | ||
| I don't want long-drawn-out either. | |||
| but I think type registery depends on use, and use depends on load/init/main. | |||
| jonathan | OK, what I suggest. | 22:26 | |
| chromatic | cotto++ | ||
| jonathan | Go ahead and do the init load stuff and put it into trunk | ||
| Then we'll fix up use in trunk, which may well just be uncommenting the two lines. | |||
| Then when we know we have those two working, *then* the type registry can go in. | |||
| pmichaud | this sounds good. | 22:27 | |
| one modification | |||
| jonathan | Since use is only one small part of the diff from branch to trunk | ||
| pmichaud | I'm going to start init load in a branch | ||
| but I expect it to be a short branch, and I expect I'll be able to merge to trunk. | |||
| but if I run into difficulties, we'll leave it in a branch and re-think from there. | |||
| jonathan | When I said put it into trunk I didn't mean "don't work on it in a branch first". | ||
| pmichaud | okay. | ||
| then we're in agreement. | |||
| jonathan | I just meant, let's try and merge it into trunk before doing the next step. | ||
| pmichaud | excellent. | 22:28 | |
| I expect I will have load/init/main fixed in a few hours. | |||
| jonathan | OK, great. | ||
| masak | pmichaud++ | ||
| jonathan | At least it eliminates one possible factor. | ||
| pmichaud | yes | ||
| jonathan | And it'll be likely easier to debug once you've done that if it doesn't fix the problem. | ||
| pmichaud | and makes what else we have to do much easier to figure out. | ||
| okay, that's the plan. thanks. | 22:29 | ||
| chromatic | Where'd our announce bot go? | ||
| pmichaud | I'm _sooooo_ glad I'm not spending the night troubleshooting hardware on my desktop. :-| | ||
| Tene | pmichaud: anything you want me to work on? | 22:30 | |
| jonathan | chromatic: It's still on the channel, just not saying anything. | ||
| Is the RSS feed or whatever it gets its data from working? | |||
| pmichaud | Tene: iwbni the various control traits were in a single rule instead of separate begin_statement end_statement catch_statement control_statement rules | 22:31 | |
| but let me check STD.pm on taht | 22:32 | ||
| yes | |||
| maybe that's not so useful... but at some point we should be able to do $<sym>=[BEGIN|END|CATCH|CONTROL|...] (or some subset of those) and not have a separate rule/method for each. | 22:33 | ||
| especially if the PAST generated for some subset of them is essentially the same except for one or two attributes. | |||
| Tene nods. | 22:34 | ||
| pmichaud | (I'm thinking that CATCH and CONTROL are pretty similar at this point) | ||
| (I suspect NEXT/REDO/LAST will be also) | |||
| avoiding the separate rules will keep the parsing speed up a bit. | |||
| a good cleanup task in general (for anyone who wants to do a patch) would be to find the instances of | 22:36 | ||
| $P0 = new 'Failure' | |||
| and replace them with | |||
| $P0 = 'undef'() | |||
| in the various builtins and classes | 22:37 | ||
| cotto | We need dalek back. | ||
| (and active) | |||
|
22:39
Limbic_Region joined
|
|||
| Tene | srsly | 22:40 | |
| Who runs dalek? They deserve praise. | |||
| cotto | the rss feed is working fine | ||
| jonathan | pmichaud: There's a ticket in RT that says to replace new 'Failure' with '!FAIL'() IIRC. | ||
| pmichaud | there are two cases. | ||
| jonathan | :-) | ||
| pmichaud | to signal an error of some sort, use '!FAIL' | 22:41 | |
| to return an undef, we should be using 'undef' | |||
| (some places simply create a Failure object) | |||
| !FAIL is preferable when it's appropriate, yes. | |||
| I just happened to run across a couple while doing other cleanups this week. | 22:42 | ||
| there might not be many more left. | |||
| jonathan | I purposefully didn't do the ticket as it looked like an easy entry point for somebody wanting to get into Rakudo. | ||
| But have been trying to not put nay more cases in to convert too. ;-) | 22:43 | ||
| pmichaud | yes, same here. | 22:44 | |
| okay, I need to take a break for a bit. will bbiaw | |||
| (to fix load/init/main) | |||
| jonathan | ok | ||
| cotto | seen Infinoid | 22:52 | |
| clunker3 | Infinoid was last seen on #parrot 3 months, 23 days, 7 hours, 7 minutes and 41 seconds ago, saying: now all we need is an opengl-based configurator :) | ||
| purl | Infinoid was last seen on purl 21 hours, 50 minutes and 47 seconds ago, saying: <private message> | ||
| Infinoid | I didn't do it! | ||
| cotto | Infinoid, are you dalek's babysitter? | 22:58 | |
| Infinoid | `n | 23:06 | |
| diakopter: I think that's you | |||
| cotto | seen diakopter | ||
| clunker3 | diakopter was last seen on #parrot 6 months, 7 days, 18 hours, 11 minutes and 35 seconds ago, saying: as in, "that meme went down the googlehole" | ||
| purl | diakopter was last seen on #parrot 41 days, 8 hours, 45 minutes and 56 seconds ago, saying: although the Ruby one is comparable. [Nov 6 14:20:33 2008] | ||
| cotto | that's no good | ||
| Infinoid logs into feather to take a look | |||
| Limbic_Region | cotto - I have his email address(es) if needed | ||
| cotto | That'd be good. dalek has stopped working. | 23:07 | |
| Limbic_Region | just a second (or a few) | ||
| cotto | thanks | ||
| Infinoid | I'm taking a look now, if it's something simple I'll fix it | 23:08 | |
| Limbic_Region | diakopter@gmail.com | ||
| he prefers not to publicly use email addresses with his real name | |||
| but if you don't get a response there - let me know and I can send something on | |||
| Infinoid | it runs from supervise; killing it should reset it. lets try that first | 23:09 | |
|
23:09
dalek joined,
Theory joined
|
|||
| Infinoid | ok. now, commit something :) | 23:09 | |
| jonathan | rakudo day can haz report use.perl.org/~JonathanWorthington/journal/38113 | 23:10 | |
| cotto hopes for an easy codingstd violation to fix | 23:11 | ||
| found one | 23:12 | ||
| committed | 23:13 | ||
| purl | The chicken is involved, but the pig is *committed*. | ||
| moritz | purl, forget committed | ||
| purl | moritz: I forgot committed | ||
| cotto | now I want bacon | ||
|
23:15
bacek_ joined
|
|||
| chromatic | I wanted chocolate. | 23:17 | |
| Now I want a bacon truffle. | |||
| moritz | t/op/string_cclass (Wstat: 256 Tests: 11 Failed: 1) Failed test: 7 | 23:18 | |
| masak | jonathan++ # $newdog = $olddog.clone(:trick); | 23:20 | |
| cotto | That doesn't address the didactic issues. | 23:21 | |
| chromatic | Hash-wise? | 23:23 | |
| cotto | message to diakopter sent | 23:26 | |
| purl | Message for to stored. | ||
| cotto | purl-- | ||
| purl | cotto: sorry... | ||
| cotto | botsnack | 23:27 | |
| purl | :) | ||
| to | hello | 23:33 | |
| hrm, shouldn't purl have told me I have messages? | |||
| heh, there were two messages | |||
| Infinoid | dalek's not working because the rss feed is not returning any data | 23:37 | |
| infinoid@feather:~$ wget www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/rss | |||
| HTTP request sent, awaiting response... No data received. | 23:38 | ||
| cotto | svn.perl.org/rss/log/parrot.rss works, although fixing parrotvm.org will probably fix dalek too | 23:46 | |
|
23:47
yjh joined
|
|||
| Whiteknight | has anybody made any opcode changes? I'm getting an error about "set_s_s_ki" not found | 23:47 | |
| oh never mind, there's a trac ticket for it already | |||
| Infinoid | cotto: dalek relies on some local hacks to add a special field to the rss, so it can get the branch name. (that's because the list of changed files aren't included in the rss data) | 23:54 | |
| so other than not having branch names, changing the URL will probably get things working | |||
| jonathan | Does parrotvm.org not run on feather too? | 23:55 | |
| Infinoid | it does | ||
| the SVN::Web installation on feather has been half-broken for a while now. | 23:56 | ||
| although... it looks like it should be possible to parse the list of changed files from perl.org rss's description fields, and generate the branch name from that | |||