|
Parrot 3.6.0 "P�jaros del Caribe" released | parrot.org | Log: irclog.perlgeek.de/parrot/today | #parrotsketch meeting Tuesday 1930 UTC Set by moderator on 19 July 2011. |
|||
|
00:15
rurban_ joined
00:17
rurban left,
rurban_ is now known as rurban
|
|||
| dalek | rrot/soh-cah-toa/hbdb: e96bc4d | soh_cah_toa++ | src/hbdb.c: Changed "help" command so that the "nop" command is not displayed since it's not a real command. |
00:21 | |
|
00:26
lichtkind left
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: 9e16438 | allison++ | ports/debian/ (6 files): Changes from Debian packages for 3.3 release. |
00:45 | |
| rrot: 7f3317a | allison++ | / (2 files): Minor spelling inconsistency that triggers package warnings |
|||
| rrot: e3f816d | allison++ | / (404 files): Merge branch 'master' of github.com:parrot/parrot |
|||
|
00:47
Coke left,
Coke joined
|
|||
| allison | um, git expert? | 00:50 | |
| benabik can provide help with git, but is unsure about 'expert'. | 00:52 | ||
| allison | well, I just made two commits | ||
| one makes sense | |||
| the other was a two line change, that's now showing up as touching 400 files | 00:53 | ||
| that makes no sense whatsoever | |||
| benabik | I think that represents all the changes in parrot master since you branched off. | 00:54 | |
| I'll check. | |||
| allison | "Showing 400 changed files with 86,282 additions and 56,972 deletions. " | ||
| that's what I suspected :( | |||
| you can just rip that commit out | 00:55 | ||
| it's a two-line change | |||
| cotto_work | I suspect that it's a scary but otherwise harmless merge commit | ||
| allison | why did it lob the whole mess into the second commit? | 00:56 | |
| benabik | Yes. The "400 changed files" are all the files that changed on master... The merge itself appears to have no painful changes. | ||
| allison | whew, nearly gave me heart-attack there... | 00:57 | |
| benabik | It didn't. You pushed three commits. Two normal ones and a merge. | ||
| cotto_work | no bytes were harmed in the making of this commit | ||
| soh_cah_toa | allison: doing a `git pull --rebase` before committing eliminates that | 00:58 | |
| er, pushing, that is | |||
| allison | can I (or someone) delete the useless merge, so it doesn't clutter up the history? | 01:01 | |
| benabik | It's not terribly cluttering. | 01:03 | |
| soh_cah_toa | i think you can only undo a merge if it was done locally. once it's pushed, i'm not sure if that's possible | ||
| benabik | And generally changing published history is considered somewhat evil. | ||
| cotto_work | It's possible but not recommended unless there a genuinely bad commit. | 01:04 | |
| benabik | soh_cah_toa: Git will happily change the refs any way you want it do. I could replace the entire history with a single commit saying "Look what I wrote" | ||
| soh_cah_toa | yikes, that sounds bad | ||
| cotto_work | benabik: please don't. ;] | ||
| soh_cah_toa | which is why i've never seen how to do that :) | ||
| benabik | You have to tell it that you really want to though. | ||
| And since many other people have the correct history, they'd just take away my commit bit and put it back. | 01:05 | ||
| cotto_work | Hopefully if you know how, you know better. | ||
| allison | heh, the one time I actually want to rewrite history :) | 01:06 | |
| any recommendations on a svn/bzr/hg interface to git? | 01:08 | ||
| all the google results go the opposite way (a git interface to svn/bzr/hg) | |||
| ah... github.com/blog/626-announcing-svn-support | 01:10 | ||
|
01:10
Khisanth left
|
|||
| benabik | `git clone mirror.github.com/http://svn.github...ils/rails` | 01:11 | |
| That URL bothers me. | 01:12 | ||
| cotto_work | that's not a typo? | ||
| benabik | No, although it doesn't work either. | ||
| cotto_work | phew | ||
| allison | it was an april fools thread, lots of random ideas :) | 01:17 | |
|
01:23
Khisanth joined
01:30
woosley joined
02:27
Kulag left
02:28
Kulag joined
02:34
Kulag left,
Kulag joined
02:40
Kulag left
03:34
daniel-s joined
04:05
bubaflub left
|
|||
| dukeleto | allison: what exactly are you trying to do? | 04:17 | |
| allison | dukeleto: with what? | ||
| GeJ | allison: launchpad.net/bzr-git ? | 04:20 | |
| dukeleto | > allison: any recommendations on a svn/bzr/hg interface to git? | 04:26 | |
| allison: are you looking for read-write in both directions? Only one way? | |||
| sorear | dukeleto: from analyzing backlog, it appears allison does not like the git-core CLI and wants something more familiar to use for Parrot hacking | 04:29 | |
| allison | dukeleto: yah, looking to wrap git in a simple "update"/"commit" interface | 04:30 | |
| dukeleto: curiously, I've been using git more lately for other projects, I just get annoyed when it bites me | 04:33 | ||
| dukeleto | allison: one thing to note is that Github now has a web interface for editing files and committing, all in the browser | ||
| allison: for small changes of a few lines, especially docs, it is very handy | |||
| allison | dukeleto: not so useful for applying patches | ||
| soh_cah_toa | oh, very nice | 04:34 | |
| github is so awesome | |||
| dukeleto | allison: are you using "git apply" for patches? | ||
| allison | dukeleto: nope | 04:35 | |
| dukeleto | allison: what does your simple update/commit interface feel like? | ||
| allison | foo checkout X | ||
| work work work | 04:36 | ||
| foo commit | |||
| foo update | |||
| work work work | |||
| foo commit | |||
| dukeleto | allison: what does update do? what does it update? a remote? | ||
| allison | dukeleto: lol :) | ||
| dukeleto: you think like a git user :) | |||
| dukeleto | allison: what else should I think like? ;) | 04:37 | |
| allison | dukeleto: update local to remote | ||
| dukeleto | allison: and how do you want to say "update my local stuff" ? | 04:38 | |
| allison | foo update | ||
| svn up | |||
| dukeleto: but, I don't really have time to mess with it | 04:39 | ||
| dukeleto: someday I'll write a tool, maybe when I retire :) | 04:40 | ||
| dukeleto: hmm... maybe I can just make some handy shell aliases... | 04:49 | ||
| dalek | rrot: 65041c4 | soh_cah_toa++ | src/runcore/ (2 files): Fixed a few perldoc errors in src/runcore/* by adding =cut tags at the end. |
04:55 | |
| soh_cah_toa | don't we have a script that looks for TODO comments in p5 code? | 05:07 | |
|
05:38
soh_cah_toa left
05:42
jsut_ joined
|
|||
| cotto | ~~ | 05:43 | |
|
05:47
jsut left
05:58
woosley left
06:11
woosley joined
|
|||
| moritz_ | ack -w TODO src/ | 06:26 | |
| ack --perl -w TODO src/ # if you really only want perl files | |||
|
06:26
woosley left
06:31
woosley joined
06:35
he joined
06:51
pbaker1 joined
06:54
pbaker left
06:56
woosley left
06:57
woosley joined
07:00
dafrito joined
07:08
woosley left
07:26
mj41 joined
|
|||
| dalek | kudo/nom-indirect-name-lookup: e923236 | moritz++ | src/Perl6/Actions.pm: unnegate a condition, because it is easier to read that way. No functional change |
08:13 | |
| kudo/nom-indirect-name-lookup: d724066 | moritz++ | src/Perl6/Actions.pm: get the very simplest case of indirect name lookups via ::() working |
|||
|
08:15
rurban_ joined
08:17
rurban left,
rurban_ is now known as rurban
|
|||
| dalek | kudo/nom-indirect-name-lookup: b5cd9ac | moritz++ | src/core/operators.pm: deal gracefully with NYI case of ::() lookups |
08:40 | |
| kudo/nom: fcd142d | moritz++ | src/ (3 files): first attempt at indirect name loookup. Does not work yet, method term:sym<name> in Actions.pm needs to learn not to touch indirect name lookups first |
09:00 | ||
| kudo/nom: e923236 | moritz++ | src/Perl6/Actions.pm: unnegate a condition, because it is easier to read that way. No functional change |
|||
| kudo/nom: d724066 | moritz++ | src/Perl6/Actions.pm: get the very simplest case of indirect name lookups via ::() working |
|||
| kudo/nom: b5cd9ac | moritz++ | src/core/operators.pm: deal gracefully with NYI case of ::() lookups |
|||
| kudo/nom: 0f7be02 | moritz++ | src/ (3 files): Merge branch 'nom-indirect-name-lookup' into nom |
|||
|
09:09
woosley joined
09:16
contingencyplan left
09:48
woosley left
09:51
Kulag joined
10:06
Kulag left
10:10
Kulag joined
10:40
smash joined
|
|||
| smash | hello everyone | 10:41 | |
| Felipe | hello | 10:43 | |
|
11:25
jsut_ left
|
|||
| Coke ponders again trying out a git-svn workflow for his work. (since there's no way the other developers will ever use git over svn) | 11:44 | ||
|
12:13
whiteknight joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | good morning, #parrot | 12:15 | |
|
12:25
bluescreen joined
12:39
RobertLJ joined
12:57
moritz_ is now known as moritz
13:21
plobsing_ left
|
|||
| whiteknight loves to see tests pass | 13:23 | ||
| dalek | R: d783008 | (Jay Emerson)++ | STATUS: Attending a conference... progress stalled for the moment. |
13:31 | |
|
13:37
JimmyZ joined
13:46
JimmyZ left
|
|||
| Felipe | whiteknight: morning :) | 13:47 | |
| could someone take a look at my pull request? | |||
| whiteknight | Felipe: sure | 13:49 | |
| good morning | |||
| I'm building now | 13:50 | ||
|
13:53
hercynium joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | Felipe: If you're going to be making a lot of patches, you should send in a CLA | 13:58 | |
| We'll make you a committer | |||
| Coke | man. i have a small svn repo with 473 commits. I'm doing a "git svn fetch" on it now, and it's slooooww. I cannot image how long this took when I was git-svn'ing parrot. | 14:01 | |
| whiteknight | Coke: hours | 14:02 | |
| Felipe | whiteknight: thanks | 14:03 | |
| whiteknight: can I send it (CLA) via PDF? | 14:08 | ||
| whiteknight | Felipe: yes, there is a fax or email option | ||
| I don't remember the details. The CLA document should tell you what tod o | |||
| to do | 14:09 | ||
| Felipe | k, I'll read it. | ||
| dalek | rrot: a4dd9e0 | Whiteknight++ | compilers/imcc/ (3 files): Merge branch 'master' of git://github.com/felipensp/parrot |
||
| rrot: a3d4738 | Whiteknight++ | compilers/imcc/imcparser. (2 files): Re-generate lex and yacc files. Merge pull request from Felipe++ |
|||
| whiteknight | pull request merged. Felipe++ | 14:10 | |
|
14:12
he left
|
|||
| Felipe | whiteknight++ thanks! | 14:13 | |
| dalek | TT #1640 closed by Felipe++: Method names that start with '@' are not recognized. | 14:21 | |
| TT #1640: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1640 | |||
| NotFound is flaming the mailing lists about windows support | 14:30 | ||
|
14:38
JimmyZ joined
|
|||
| whiteknight is flaming the windows code | 14:38 | ||
| dalek | rrot: bd1c96d | Whiteknight++ | src/platform/win32/dl.c: Add in a slightly less bad, but still no better, hack to find libc functions on windows. Instead of looking up modules by string name, which are guaranteed to change because 'why the heck not?', we can use an undocumented trick to find the HMODULE owner for a particular function pointer. See in-code comments and TT #2150 for more details. |
||
| whiteknight needs a shower after that filth | |||
| Coke agrees with kevin, and has already done that. | |||
| Coke needs to have a big button to push to run a fresh smoke on parrot on windows. (right now I need 2 windows open, so cannot script it) | 14:39 | ||
|
14:41
hercynium left
|
|||
| NotFound | whiteknight: that hack is for finding libc functions, or libparrot functions? | 14:42 | |
|
14:42
hercynium joined
|
|||
| NotFound | NM, have seen it now. | 14:44 | |
| whiteknight | NotFound: if you have a free moment, would you be able to run a quick smolder report from winxp with that fix? | ||
| it works here on win7, I want to make sure it goes back to winxp | 14:45 | ||
| NotFound | I'll do, but I'm increasingly losing sympathy for that kind of things. | ||
| whiteknight | you don't have to if you don't want to. If nobody uses it, we don't need to care if it's broken | 14:46 | |
| I have a windows VM I use for iTunes. I can try to set up activeperl and MSVC on it | 14:47 | ||
| NotFound | I don't mind doing it, but I dislike people implying that we have a morale imperative to do it. | ||
| whiteknight | no. no moral imperative. | 14:50 | |
|
14:52
simcop2387 left
|
|||
| NotFound | Oh, and I mention windows just because I've do parrot things on it several times, but the same applies to Mac OS whatever. | 14:54 | |
| Coke | whiteknight: I have a dev box I use for work that I will try to regularly smoke on windows going forward. | 14:55 | |
| I don't think there's a /moral/ imperitive. I think that if we ever want parrot to be USED, having it work on windows is kind of a requirement. | 14:56 | ||
| whiteknight | Coke: I'm not trying to guilt more people into setting up more windows smokers. It's the lack of developers on those systems that's the big hassle | ||
| like before the 3.6 release, we know for two weeks that there were test failures on windows, and they didn't get fixed until the monday before a big release | |||
| Coke | whiteknight: Yup. More addressed at NF. | ||
| whiteknight | finding bugs is not a problem, getting those bugs fixed is the big challenge | ||
| NotFound | Coke: it may be a requirement for people that use windows a lot. Not for me. | 14:57 | |
| whiteknight | I use windows at work, but it's hard to spend more than a few seconds at a time looking at Parrot code when I'm supposed to be clocked in and doing $dayjob | ||
| Coke | NotFound: to each their own, obviously. I think it needs to be a goal of /the foundation/ to drive that sort of thing. | ||
| (which, as a director, no doubt I did a crappy job at. Now I blame whiteknight instead, much easier) | |||
|
14:58
simcop2387 joined
|
|||
| NotFound | Coke: if the sort of thing is portability in general, I can agree. If it's specific for one, I disagree, no matter how popular it may be. | 15:00 | |
| whiteknight | having smolder working, and having smokers running is a big first step, and a very important one to take | ||
| As I said in my one email, we don't have a defined list of supported platforms anymore, at least not an updated one | 15:01 | ||
| Windows XP very well may not be supported or supportable anymore | |||
| NotFound | whiteknight: I'm not opposed. Some months ago there was a check in the codebase demanding W 2000 or later. | 15:02 | |
| whiteknight | NotFound: If we have a parrot hacker on winxp, that's one thing. If we don't have any hackers, and can't even buy a new copy of it, that's hard to get around | ||
| so we have to hope that people have winxp still installed, or still have their cds around | |||
| NotFound | I just mention that XP is the only Windows platform I have available. If parrot doesn't build on it, I can't check anything windows related. I will survive. | 15:03 | |
| benabik | I have XP around, although I have no dev envrionment set up for it right now. | 15:04 | |
| whiteknight | putting together a list of supported platforms seems like it's something a product-managerish person should be responsible for | ||
| NotFound | But maybe windows support don't survive ;) | ||
| whiteknight: nciutils.t still fails | 15:22 | ||
| whiteknight | damnit | ||
| RobertLJ | sorry I am coing into the conversation a bit late .. is there a need for smoke testing on Windows ? | 15:30 | |
| I have access to Win7 .. and have buit parrot using Strawberry perl in the past | 15:31 | ||
| NotFound | RobertLJ: yes, will be good to see if the problem is the same in Win7 than in XP. | 15:33 | |
| RobertLJ | Is the somke server currently available ? | ||
| NotFound | RobertLJ: yes | ||
|
15:33
bluescreen left
|
|||
| RobertLJ | so what is needed is for someone to run smoke test on windows for win XP and Windows 7 ? | 15:34 | |
| is that correct ? | |||
|
15:34
bluescreen joined
|
|||
| NotFound | RobertLJ: I've do it with strawberry in XP, having a smoke with strawberry in Windows 7 in order to compare is what can help now. | 15:36 | |
| In the long run, having regular smokes from both will be nice. | |||
| RobertLJ | got ya .. I think I can help with that | 15:37 | |
|
15:37
simcop2387_ joined
|
|||
| RobertLJ | this is great .. been loking for a way to get involved in parrot | 15:37 | |
| whiteknight | RobertLJ++ | 15:38 | |
| NotFound | There's more than one way to get involved ;) | ||
|
15:38
simcop2387 left,
simcop2387_ is now known as simcop2387
|
|||
| RobertLJ | I'm sure there is a long list ;-) | 15:38 | |
|
15:48
ambs joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | it's good to get started somewhere | 15:49 | |
|
15:53
JimmyZ left
15:54
bluescreen left
|
|||
| dalek | kudo/nom: 2357ca6 | moritz++ | src/core/Str.pm: implement Str.split(Regex, :$all) -- no limit yet |
15:54 | |
| dukeleto | ~~ | 15:55 | |
|
15:55
bluescreen joined
15:57
alester joined
|
|||
| dalek | kudo/nom: 69fe226 | moritz++ | src/core/operators.pm: implement indirect name lookup of composed names ::("X::Base") |
16:03 | |
| NotFound | whiteknight: the module that find_module_from_func(atoi) returns here is libparrot | 16:06 | |
| whiteknight | it should return the libparrot module the first time. Should return the libc module the second | 16:10 | |
|
16:14
rurban__ joined
|
|||
| NotFound | Looks like the msvcrt lib that this thing is using is static. | 16:15 | |
| So it is linked into libparrot, and GetProcAddress does not found the symbol because it hasn't extern linkage attributes. | 16:16 | ||
|
16:17
rurban left,
rurban__ is now known as rurban
|
|||
| Felipe | whiteknight: I've sent the CLA. | 16:23 | |
| whiteknight | Felipe++. I'll look at it as soon as I get it | 16:24 | |
| NotFound: That sucks. There might be no solution | |||
| We could try to dynamically load msvcrt anyway, but that might cause problems | 16:25 | ||
| Felipe: Got it. Next tuesday at our weekly meeting in #parrotsketch, we'll nominate you and vote on it | 16:28 | ||
| NotFound | The simple solution is to delete the tests and document that getting symbols from the C std library is platform dependant and not granted to work. | 16:29 | |
|
16:30
daniel-s left
|
|||
| whiteknight | I like that solution | 16:30 | |
| Comment on TT #2150 | |||
|
16:31
dafrito left
|
|||
| Felipe | whiteknight: okay, thanks. | 16:31 | |
|
16:31
jsut joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | Felipe: Meeting is every week, 19:30 UTC, in #parrotsketch. You can attend if you want | 16:32 | |
| People give reports before the meeting: What you did last week, what you will do, what tickets you worked on, what you are blocked on, etc | 16:33 | ||
|
16:33
RobertLJ left
|
|||
| whiteknight | Then we chat and ask questions and stuff | 16:33 | |
|
16:33
SHODAN joined
|
|||
| NotFound | whiteknight: commented | 16:34 | |
| whiteknight | NotFound++ | ||
|
16:35
darbelo joined
|
|||
| cotto | ~~ | 16:38 | |
| does dalek still do rss feeds? I don't see any blogs in misc/dalek-conf.json | 16:40 | ||
| whiteknight | I don't know | 16:41 | |
|
16:44
lichtkind joined
|
|||
| benabik | If it does, maybe we should point it a Planet Parrot. | 16:45 | |
| cotto | That'd be fine by me. | ||
|
16:46
darbelo_ joined,
darbelo left
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: e890ebe | dukeleto++ | docs/project/support_policy.pod: [doc] Remove some antiquated references to svn-- |
16:46 | |
|
16:46
darbelo_ left
|
|||
|
16:46
darbelo joined
|
|||
| benabik | karma svn | 16:50 | |
| aloha | svn has karma of -21. | ||
| benabik | hehe | ||
| svn can now drink negative beer | |||
| cotto | benabik, you misspelled svn-- | 16:52 | |
| common mistake | 16:53 | ||
| ;] | |||
| benabik | cotto++ # helping me fix my spelling | ||
|
17:08
dodathome joined
17:12
darbelo_ joined,
darbelo left,
darbelo joined,
darbelo_ left
17:21
lichtkind left
17:22
jay joined
|
|||
| dukeleto | attempting to use PHP's PEAR really makes you appreciate CPAN | 17:23 | |
| atrodo | dukeleto> Are you sure you don't want PECL? | 17:24 | |
| dukeleto | atrodo: maybe i do | 17:25 | |
| atrodo: what I actually want is PHP code coverage that doesn't suck | 17:26 | ||
| atrodo | dukeleto> Can't help you there. Just have never been able to figure out the mess that is php's libraries | 17:28 | |
| cotto_work | ~~ | ||
| dukeleto | atrodo: PECL seems to be for C extensions to PHP (what could go wrong? tests? what are tests?) and seem to be compatible with PEAR | ||
| cotto_work: have you ever used a PHP code coverage utility that you didn't hate? | 17:29 | ||
| cotto_work | dukeleto: they have those? | ||
| atrodo | dukeleto> That's what I seem to recall as well. But I could never figure out why they needed multiple extension libraries. | ||
| dukeleto | cotto_work: indeed they do, but not many use them. | 17:30 | |
| atrodo has still never figured out why cpan is still so good compared to everyone else | 17:31 | ||
| whiteknight | volume | ||
| cotto_work | dukeleto: I'm more surprised that they have coverage tools than that they don't use them. | ||
| whiteknight | We really need coverage tools for Parrot | ||
|
17:31
mj41 left
|
|||
| cotto_work | dukeleto: what's your interest in php? | 17:32 | |
| dukeleto | phpcoverage.sourceforge.net is one coverage tool | ||
|
17:32
lucian joined
17:33
lichtkind joined
|
|||
| dukeleto | lucian: howdy | 17:33 | |
| lucian | dukeleto: hi | 17:34 | |
| re. aloha, i didn't really have anything to blog about | |||
|
17:35
lichtkind left
|
|||
| dukeleto | lucian: you can blog about what your current status is, and what you have tried that didn't work, and what you will try next | 17:35 | |
| lucian: there is plenty to blog about | |||
| lucian | ok | 17:36 | |
| dukeleto | lucian: it is also your soapbox to describe what things in parrot need to be improved | ||
| lucian: which I am sure you have plenty to say about :) | |||
| lucian | perhaps :) | ||
| dalek | kudo/nom: e2279de | pmichaud++ | src/core/Numeric.pm: Fix .count for various numeric operators. flussence++ . |
||
| atrodo | wait, when did lucian have stong opinions about improvements to parrot? ;) | 17:39 | |
| Since we talked about the subject, does plumage have a website? | |||
| dukeleto | atrodo: i have been thinking that it needs one. We need something like modules.perl6.org | 17:43 | |
|
17:47
writtencode left
17:48
writtencode joined,
contingencyplan joined,
RobertLJ joined
17:50
fperrad joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | I would like to get on the parrot.github.org bandwagon | 17:51 | |
| We can have a lot more flexibility to add new pages and content there than we would have on parrot.org | 17:52 | ||
| parrot.github.org/plumage would be a great page for it | |||
| atrodo | I would vote for it's own website | 17:53 | |
| whiteknight | is it worth the infrastructure costs, in terms of manpower and maybe even money? | 17:54 | |
| If we're doing the github pages thing, We could have a website up tonight | 17:55 | ||
| and all current parrot hackers with a commit bit could edit it | |||
| atrodo | I would guess in the long term it would be. Although, I'm thinking it'd be like cpan is now | 17:56 | |
| whiteknight | okay, I'm not thinking of anything so grandiose | ||
|
17:56
mj41 joined
|
|||
| dukeleto | atrodo: easier said than done | 17:56 | |
| whiteknight: i am with you | |||
| whiteknight | plumage is basically just a metadata store, it doesn't contain the actual packages | ||
| atrodo | dukeleto> I'm aware. Something quick for now would do | ||
| dukeleto | something like pgxn.org/ is something to shoot for in the long term. But github pages for now... | 17:58 | |
| whiteknight: if you start a gh-pages branch in plumage.git, i will help | |||
| whiteknight | okay, I may play with that tonight | 17:59 | |
| Plumage really doesn't get enough love. I want to get in there and clean up the code too | |||
| I've thought about putting together a replacement with winxed/rosella, but I haven't yet | 18:00 | ||
| plus, I don't want to deal with the bootstrapping issues | 18:02 | ||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: plumage does what it tries to do well, currently. Why do we need to refactor it yet again? We need your refactoring abillities in core more than in Plumage | 18:03 | |
| whiteknight | dukeleto: You can't contain me. I'm like a free spirit, man | ||
| atrodo | Does plumage have a database it pulls from for packages? | ||
| whiteknight | atrodo: a json file, I think | ||
| or yaml | |||
| dukeleto | atrodo: yeah, project.json in the root of the plumage.git repo, methinks | ||
| cotto_work | I notice that master still hasn't broken. | 18:04 | |
| whiteknight | atrodo: github.com/parrot/plumage/tree/mas...e/metadata | ||
| dukeleto | atrodo: i lied. github.com/parrot/plumage/tree/mas...e/metadata | ||
| whiteknight | cotto_work: I'm doing my best! | ||
| dukeleto | whiteknight-- for beating me | ||
| atrodo | Yay! Data overload! | ||
| writtencode | Hey guys, just want to point out something in the docs about the grammar (docs.parrot.org/parrot/latest/html/....pod.html) - Under "Rules and Tokens", there's the line "The record rule given previously would match "6355 John" or "6355 John" but not "6355John"." The two examples of what would work appear to be exactly the same; I assume there's supposed to be an endline or extra space, but there ddoesn't | 18:05 | |
| whiteknight | writtencode: yes, that does look suspicious | ||
| writtencode | Mm'k, hope it helps :) | 18:06 | |
| whiteknight | We'll have to figure out what it is supposed to be, then fix it. | ||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: hey, IMCC called and said that it disgraced your village, and that you should stop trying to contain its freewheelin' antics, man | ||
| writtencode | It's about smart whitespace matching, so it probably just needs blatant extra whitespace characters | 18:07 | |
| whiteknight | dukeleto: THE BASTARD! IT'S CLOBBERING TIME! | ||
| atrodo | dukeleto++ | ||
| dukeleto imagines IMCC riding a hog in Easy Rider, flipping off whiteknight++ | 18:08 | ||
|
18:10
dmalcolm joined
18:13
darbelo_ joined,
darbelo left
|
|||
| atrodo | whiteknight> ping | 18:13 | |
| whiteknight | pong | 18:14 | |
| atrodo | whiteknight> I wanted to pick your brain real quick if you have a few minutes | ||
| (about m0/lorito) | |||
| whiteknight | yeah, sure | 18:15 | |
| atrodo | whiteknight> So I'm thinking again about how you would take a complete m0, and replace parts, but not all, of parrot with it | 18:16 | |
| And I'm just unable to figure out how it would work | |||
| whiteknight | atrodo: My thought is this: We set up a preprocessing utility that converts M0 into C code | 18:17 | |
| like how pmc2c converts the crappy pmc language into regular C | |||
| or ops2c does the same thing | |||
| dalek | TT #2161 created by whiteknight++: Whitespace confusion in PCT docs | 18:18 | |
| TT #2161: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/2161 | |||
| whiteknight | Basically, the idea is that we can write M0 code long before we have to be interpreting it through the M0 runloop. Divorce the two ideas | ||
| Write the code and have it be translated to C as part of the build | |||
|
18:18
RobertLJ left
|
|||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: quite subversive and nefarious. I like it. | 18:19 | |
| whiteknight | Then, when you have everything in M0 that you want to have in it, you can start changing the build to compile it down to bytecode instead and change the way we call into it | ||
| atrodo | whiteknight> So you'd have to change all/most the C code before you can start introducing an actual m0 runcore? | 18:20 | |
| dukeleto | atrodo: why do you say that? | ||
| whiteknight | atrodo: On a per-subsystem basis | ||
| atrodo | whiteknight> Yes | ||
| whiteknight | rewrite one subsystem in M0, then change that system to execute through the runloop | 18:21 | |
| dukeleto | atrodo: for instance, simple PMCs should be able to be converted to M0 without most of the rest of Parrot being in M0 | ||
| whiteknight | A few macros placed judiciously would allow us to do a compile-time switch between C mode and M0 mode | ||
| dukeleto | I think implementing the Integer PMC in M0 or mole will be a valuable litmus test. | ||
| atrodo | dukeleto> right. But you wouldn't have a m0 runcore until all or most of the internals are converted to m0 | ||
| whiteknight | I think taking the Integer PMC out back and shooting it with a shotgun filled with used medical syringes would be better | 18:22 | |
| dukeleto | whiteknight: what pmc would you prefer? and why so much hate for Integer PMC? | ||
| whiteknight | Something that isn't so tangled up with the Scalar PMC would be better | 18:23 | |
| *PMCArray would be better, methinks | |||
| lucian | writtencode: it might even be desirable to keep the option of compiling to C | 18:24 | |
| atrodo | whiteknight> Feelings for inanimate concepts aside, let's take a simple example that is causing me a major road block. And perhaps it's not applicable to PMCs as much as other subsystems | ||
| whiteknight | atrodo: sure | ||
| atrodo | whiteknight> What about impedance mismatches between m0 and parrot. The example that comes to mind is registers | 18:25 | |
| If a section of C code is accessing parrot registers, how would that translate appropriately into m0, who's concept of registers is slightly differnt | |||
| whiteknight | very very few places in parrot interact with registers at the PIR level directly | 18:26 | |
| like: maybe zero | |||
| atrodo | What about PCC? | ||
| Coke | nonzero, as I think pmichaud pointed out recently. | ||
| whiteknight | okay, maybe one | 18:27 | |
| Accessing registers in the CallContext object from the C internals is very rare | |||
| the ops usually rip things out of the registers, pass them to C functions, then store results back in registers. The ops are the interface for that kind of stuff | 18:28 | ||
| atrodo: So I guess I'm not sure what you're getting at? | 18:29 | ||
| atrodo | whiteknight> I thought the use of registers was more widespread than that, which would cause some impedance mismatches. | 18:30 | |
| whiteknight | PCC does it, MMD does it too, I think. | ||
| Coke | whiteknight: smolder.parrot.org/app/projects/rep...ails/18373 | ||
| whiteknight | no, nevermind. MMD pulls there registers out of the CallContext signature | 18:31 | |
| Coke++ | |||
| atrodo | whiteknight> So, take this at-some-point future scenario. We have a working m0, runcore and mole. There is even a ops2m0 written that will translate existing ops into sequences of m0 ops | ||
| The next step would be making parrot available to the m0 runcore in that scenario. | 18:32 | ||
| nopaste | "Coke" at 192.168.1.3 pasted "This Parrot cannot read bytecode files with version 10" (7 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/63097 | 18:33 | |
| Coke | blah. | ||
| dukeleto | Coke: perl Configure.pl --gen-parrot | ||
| atrodo | So far, the only ideas I have had are to compile most of the existing parrot subsystems down to m0 through a c2m0 library so parrot would literally run on top of m0 | ||
|
18:34
RobertLJ joined
|
|||
| Coke | dukeleto: that doesn't work, because GIT + C++ are not both available in the same shell. | 18:34 | |
| so I can't have the compile step automatically check things out via git for me. | |||
| dukeleto | Coke: sounds like a bug in the operating system | 18:35 | |
| whiteknight | atrodo: That's basically what I am talking about with my idea, but a more gradual mechanism. Convert everything that's going to be converted to M0 and compile to C to test the semantics keep working | ||
| atrodo | Or, there is a parrot interface PMC/m0 object that ops2m0 uses to call into parrot internals | ||
| Coke | dukeleto: most helpful. | ||
| whiteknight | atrodo: then, when you've translated everything that's going to be translated, we switch over so that it runs from the runloop | ||
| brb | |||
| Coke | this is very likely due to the fact that parrot doesn't have its act together when installing multiple simultaneous versions, is all. | ||
| (esp. since we just changed the version of the bytecode with the release.) | 18:36 | ||
| ah. more likely due to an old build of nqp and a new build of parrot. | 18:37 | ||
| whiteknight | yes, that would definitely cause a problem | 18:48 | |
| What would it take to make multiple versions of Parrot installable simultaneously? | 19:02 | ||
| I mean, do we know it can't be done? | |||
| jay | ~~ | ||
| whiteknight | hello jay | ||
| jay | I've got some benchmarks. Interested? | ||
| whiteknight | youbetcha | 19:03 | |
| jay | The task: calculate the mean of N pseudo-random exponentials. | ||
| In NQR, I have a simple PIR loop doing calls to R's random number generator, and the mean is calculated using the GNU Scientific library function. | 19:04 | ||
| Result: both R and NQR have linear complexity, but the slope is substantially higher for NQR. | 19:05 | ||
| The real difference (as far as I can tell): the PIR loop seems to be a much less efficient wrapper to the random number generation than R's C loops. | |||
| whiteknight | I'm sure. We don't have JIT yet so that's a big part of it | 19:06 | |
| jay | I don't think there is any other overhead getting in the way. | ||
| Good to know -- good to know you aren't surprised, that is. | |||
|
19:06
RobertLJ left
|
|||
| whiteknight | you wrote the loop in PIR? or you wrote it in NQR? | 19:06 | |
| jay | Well, the code is NQR, but I implemented the loop in PIR, yes, as runtime. | 19:07 | |
| dukeleto | whiteknight: it is because our configure subsystem makes assumptions that are dumb and wrong, and because parrot x.y.z and parrot x.y.z+commits are both installed into the same place | 19:08 | |
| whiteknight | okay | ||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: if we installed dev versions into a directory containing a git-describe string, that would probably solve the "multiple simultaneous parrot versions" problem | ||
| whiteknight | but, discrete versions can be installed simultaneously? | ||
| like parrot 3.5.0 and parrot 3.6.0 can live peacefully? | 19:09 | ||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: yes | ||
| whiteknight | okay, nice | ||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: because they live in different directories | ||
| whiteknight | that doesn't seem like too hard a problem to solve | ||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: but if master happens to be 100 commits past 3.6.0, it will still install into the 3.6.0 folder | ||
| jay | When I build 3.6.0 I got a warning about possible conflicts with previously installed libparrot I think. But I'm happily running the newest and greatest now, no problem. | ||
| dukeleto | jay: yeah, that is because you had an older version of parrot installed. It can occasionally cause a build failure, but if stuff compiled, you are fine | 19:10 | |
| jay | If I have an NQR script, can I "compile" it, or compile the bytecode for faster performance? | 19:14 | |
| < I could be asking the same question about squaak, of course > | 19:15 | ||
| whiteknight | yes | ||
| I need to double-check, but I think you can do something like this: "parrot-nqp --target=pir --output=foo.pir nqr.pbc foo.r | 19:16 | ||
| " | |||
| moritz | or maybe just | ||
| ./nqp --target=pir foo.r > foo.pir | |||
| erm | |||
| ./nqr | |||
| if you have a newer version that builds a fakexecutable | |||
| whiteknight | yeah, that looks cleaner | ||
| jay | will try... | 19:17 | |
| Ok, I now seem to have a PIR file. Can it be compiled to machine code now? | 19:19 | ||
| whiteknight | and then once you have the .pir, you can do "parrot -o foo.pbc foo.pir" to get bytecode | ||
| jay | LOL whiteknight++ | ||
| whiteknight | and "parrot foo.pbc" to run it | ||
| I don't know how well that all works, especially if you have runtime files to include | 19:20 | ||
| jay | Yeah, not so well... | 19:23 | |
| jay@bayesman:~/Desktop/NQR$ parrot foo.pbc | |||
| Could not find sub !intarray | |||
| current instr.: '_block1000' pc 6 (foo.pir:8) (benchmark3.nqr:3) | |||
| whiteknight | yeah, there's going to be a trick to it | ||
| moritz | you might need to loade_bytecode your compiled runtime files in the generated files | ||
| jay | that !intarray is my version of squaak's !array, defined in my runtime. | ||
| whiteknight | jay, and that's in the main compiler file? | 19:24 | |
| jay | I thought so, I defined it in the top of Runtime.pm just as was done in squaak, so I thought that was used as an onload | 19:25 | |
| I think we'll put this on the back burner for now. I may need to put things in different places or do what moritz suggested with load_bytecode. | 19:29 | ||
| dalek | R: d2afee1 | (Jay Emerson)++ | s (4 files): Vectorized rexp() and fixed mean() |
19:30 | |
| whiteknight | jay: I'll try to take a look at it soon | ||
| dalek | R: 64e8759 | (Jay Emerson)++ | RANDOM.NOTES: Added whiteknight++ and moritz++ suggestions on compiling to |
19:31 | |
| jay | Thanks. Not really NQR-specific, you could in theory be interested in the same thing for a squaak script, right? | ||
| whiteknight | right | 19:32 | |
| dalek | kudo/nom: 823f449 | moritz++ | / (3 files): implement &floor and &reverse, add more test files |
||
| whiteknight | we'll get it working in NQR, then backport the knowledge to the docs | ||
| it's the circle of life | |||
|
19:35
simcop2387_ joined
19:36
simcop2387 left,
simcop2387_ is now known as simcop2387
19:44
alester left
|
|||
| jay | What is the state of threading? (Trying to put together some slides for a talk) | 19:52 | |
| whiteknight | state_of_threading = 0 | 19:53 | |
| er, maybe 0.5 | |||
| jay | Ok... "in the pipeline"? | ||
| whiteknight | yes | ||
|
20:00
soh_cah_toa joined
|
|||
| soh_cah_toa | ~~ | 20:01 | |
| whiteknight | hello soh_cah_toa | ||
| soh_cah_toa | whiteknight: howdy | 20:02 | |
| whiteknight | how are you doing today? | ||
| soh_cah_toa | not bad. trying to setup parrot on openbsd | 20:03 | |
| which is not fun | |||
| whiteknight | I imagine not. I used to do it a lot with solaris, but that really lost its appeal after a while | 20:04 | |
| soh_cah_toa | oh yeah, i've tried that too | ||
| whiteknight | I had it working pretty well for a while, but I changed computers and never bothered reinstalling it | ||
| soh_cah_toa | the real pain is getting used to a different package manager | ||
| whiteknight | yeah | 20:05 | |
| what is it there, pkg? | |||
| soh_cah_toa | yeah, you can use the pkg_* commands or the ports collection | ||
| it took me about 1+ hours yesterday to install git b/c the ports is just a bunch of Makefiles so i had to compile a TON of dependencies | 20:06 | ||
|
20:07
bluescreen left
|
|||
| whiteknight | ouch | 20:08 | |
| soh_cah_toa | oh yeah | 20:09 | |
| we need the tests run though | |||
|
20:17
bluescreen joined
20:23
whiteknight left
20:24
jay left
20:37
particle left
|
|||
| Coke | TLILY | 20:44 | |
|
20:44
Coke left
20:45
Coke joined
|
|||
| dalek | R: 948b2fa | (Jay Emerson)++ | benchmark3.nqr: Added a benchmark example script |
20:49 | |
|
20:57
darbelo joined,
darbelo_ left
|
|||
| dalek | kudo/nom: e6f6b27 | moritz++ | src/core/ (2 files): basic Str.comb implementation |
21:01 | |
|
21:05
fperrad left
21:15
dodathome left
21:19
SHODAN left
21:20
smash left
21:22
perlite left
21:23
perlite joined
21:28
ambs left,
rdesfo joined
21:34
rdesfo left
21:35
bluescreen left
21:37
dmalcolm left
21:43
Psyche^ joined
21:49
Patterner left,
Psyche^ is now known as Patterner
22:25
hercynium left
22:32
mj41 left
22:37
kid51 joined
22:44
darbelo_ joined,
darbelo left
|
|||
| soh_cah_toa | test failures on openbsd: smolder.parrot.org/app/projects/rep...ails/18391 | 22:44 | |
| Felipe | hm | 22:48 | |
| benabik | installing Lion & | 22:53 | |
|
22:53
benabik left
|
|||
| dukeleto | soh_cah_toa: looks like get_pointer doesn't work correctly, which is causing the extend_vtable test failure | 22:55 | |
| soh_cah_toa | eh, not too familiar w/ the vtable functions | 22:56 | |
| looking at t/dynpmc/os.t though...looks like there no openbsd test at all | |||
| though i'm really bad at reading other people's tests :\\ | 22:57 | ||
| kid51 | That's the first Smolder report we've had on OpenBSD since Sept 2010! | 22:58 | |
| soh_cah_toa | wow :O | ||
| dukeleto | soh_cah_toa: the get_pointer test is saying that a NULL pointer was returned, which is why the test is failing | 22:59 | |
| kid51 | dukeleto: Is there some reason you haven't set up a smoker on OpenBSD at the compile farm? | ||
| soh_cah_toa | hm | ||
| kid51 | dukeleto: I would consider doing it, but not if you've already discovered it won't work | 23:00 | |
| dukeleto | kid51: when i tried, it wouldn't compile. Could have been a similar issue to the one that just got noticed by doughera++ and fixed | ||
| kid51: i haven't tried in a few months | |||
| kid51: i thought it was a memory issue/gc bug when i gave up | 23:01 | ||
| soh_cah_toa | it compiles and installs fine now. just those tests fails | ||
| dukeleto | soh_cah_toa: on that machine | ||
| soh_cah_toa | yeah | 23:02 | |
| kid51 away phone | |||
| dalek | rrot: d78ddd0 | dukeleto++ | t/README.pod: [doc] Add instructions about smoking parrot to the test suite readme |
23:07 | |
| soh_cah_toa | dukeleto++ | 23:08 | |
| believe it or not, that's actually one of the hardest parts of installing parrot on openbsd. that's why i'm writing a "installing parrot on openbsd" guide for the wiki right now | 23:09 | ||
|
23:09
whiteknight joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: 44aaea4 | dukeleto++ | t/README.pod: [doc] Add a note about the smolder_coretest makefile target to the test suite readme |
23:09 | |
| whiteknight | good evening, #parrot | 23:11 | |
| Felipe | good evening | ||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: howdy | ||
| looks like the chroot test that fails on openbsd is either wrong, or should be skipped on openbsd. Possibly a security feature which prevents nested symbolic links | 23:12 | ||
| whiteknight | hello Felipe, dukeleto | ||
| dukeleto: I like writing new tests, I like getting rid of bad tests even more | |||
| soh_cah_toa | ah | ||
| dukeleto: if that's the case, do you think it should just be skipped? | 23:14 | ||
| dukeleto | soh_cah_toa: that is just my guess | 23:16 | |
| soh_cah_toa | looks like you're right: "too many levels of symbolic links" | 23:17 | |
| dukeleto | soh_cah_toa: yes, i read the test output to formulate my guess ;) | 23:19 | |
| soh_cah_toa | i didn't know how you knew that. i suck at this kinda stuff | 23:20 | |
| dukeleto | soh_cah_toa: the more you do it, the less suckage. I have been staring at byzantine test output for a few more years than you have :) | 23:22 | |
| dukeleto compiles parrot on the gcc compile farm openbsd machine, which is a 1 GHz Sun UltraSPARC-IIIi | 23:24 | ||
| Felipe | :D | 23:25 | |
| soh_cah_toa | anyway, is it ok to just skip it on openbsd? i can have a patch in < 5 minutes | ||
| dukeleto | soh_cah_toa: no, i misread the test output. the regex that the test is using to detect too many levels of links is wrong on openbsd | 23:28 | |
| soh_cah_toa: fix the regex so it is more forgiving | |||
| soh_cah_toa looks | |||
|
23:28
rdesfo joined
|
|||
| kid51 back | 23:29 | ||
| dukeleto | soh_cah_toa: checking if the output contains "chroot failed: Too many levels of symbolic links" is probably sufficient | ||
| soh_cah_toa: or just "chroot failed" | |||
| soh_cah_toa | ok | ||
| dukeleto | soh_cah_toa: this is the problem with not having exception objects | 23:30 | |
| if only chromatic were here to scold us | |||
| kid51 | soh_cah_toa: Do you have a dedicated openbsd box? A vm? An account somewhere? | ||
| soh_cah_toa | kid51: both vm and box. though the smoke report was from a vm | 23:31 | |
| kid51 | Very interesting. I often go to the NYC BSD User group meeting (albeit mostly for the beer). | ||
| But they're mostly sysadmins, netadmins, etc., so languages and process VMs are not their major interest. | 23:32 | ||
| soh_cah_toa | right | ||
| kid51 | If I found someone like that in NYC who was interested in Parrot, that would be an incentive for me to learn more about BSD. | 23:33 | |
| I know Linux more only because of (a) Linode; (b) day job. | |||
| If I could get something like Linode on FreeBSD, I'd definitely explore it. | 23:34 | ||
| kid51 doesn't like hardware | |||
| soh_cah_toa | i actually like freebsd a lot more than openbsd but openbsd is a lot more secure | ||
| kid51 | I've gone to several editions of the NYC BSD conference. | 23:35 | |
| soh_cah_toa | cool, didn't know there was one | ||
| kid51 | We had George Neville-Neil speak at Perl Seminar NY | ||
| In fact, I quoted him in a parrot.org blog last October | |||
| Tene | kid51: I've got a VM server here that's not doing much; I'd be glad to give you a VM to install freebsd on. | 23:36 | |
| soh_cah_toa | oh, very neat | ||
| kid51 | probably: nycbug.org | ||
| Tene | or anyone else here | ||
| kid51 | Tene: I'll definitely consider that | ||
| ... but now I have to start working on my FOSSCON talk/slides | |||
| soh_cah_toa will brb | |||
| Tene | anyone who wants VMs for parrot hacking or testing, email me at allalone.org | 23:37 | |
| kid51 | afk | 23:38 | |
|
23:38
lucian left
23:41
contingencyplan left
|
|||
| dukeleto notes that it took 10 minutes to compile the parrot core ops on gcc64 (must easier to type than "the openbsd compile farm machine that happens to be a sparc") | 23:41 | ||
| dalek | href="https://parrot.github.com:">parrot.github.com: 25b81ce | Whiteknight++ | index.md: test |
||
| href="https://parrot.github.com:">parrot.github.com: d3643a7 | Whiteknight++ | _layouts/site.html: Redo the layout as a quick skeleton |
23:44 | ||
| soh_cah_toa is back | 23:47 | ||
| dalek | href="https://parrot.github.com:">parrot.github.com: 03c512e | Whiteknight++ | / (2 files): borrow liberally from docs.parrot.org |
23:48 | |
| href="https://parrot.github.com:">parrot.github.com: b752ef7 | Whiteknight++ | _layouts/site.html: fix path to css file |
23:49 | ||
|
23:56
rdesfo left
|
|||
| dalek | href="https://parrot.github.com:">parrot.github.com: 2a04069 | Whiteknight++ | _layouts/site.html: fix header image |
23:57 | |
| href="https://parrot.github.com:">parrot.github.com: 07cdef2 | Whiteknight++ | _layouts/site.html: Break out a sidebar with some stubbed-out sections |
|||
| href="https://parrot.github.com:">parrot.github.com: fa9d330 | Whiteknight++ | stylesheets/parrot.css: +CSS fixes |
|||
| href="https://parrot.github.com:">parrot.github.com: 5227fb0 | Whiteknight++ | stylesheets/parrot.css: hack-fix to make the sidebar not overflow the outer wrapper div |
23:59 | ||