|
Parrot 6.4.0 "Double-eyed Fig Parrot" | parrot.org/ | Log: irclog.perlgeek.de/parrot | #parrotsketch meeting Tuesday 19:30 UTC Set by moderator on 25 May 2014. |
|||
| Coke | saw a commit to master from ZYROz; intentional? | 00:08 | |
| rurban | that was the merge into master | 00:20 | |
| Util | Coke: Looks like rurban merged the pmc2c_orig2-gh1069 branch into master. | ||
| rurban | It's stable now | ||
| We want to release it next week, and rakudo gets a 4% speed boost | 00:21 | ||
| parrot -O2 was not faster with rakudo when I tested it. only parrot got faster | 00:22 | ||
|
01:11
rurban joined
01:17
rurban joined
01:20
FROGGS_ joined
04:14
nnunley joined
05:58
awwaiid joined
06:05
awwaiid joined
06:17
rurban joined
06:19
rurban1 joined
06:27
rurban joined
06:42
awwaiid joined
07:02
FROGGS_ joined
07:28
rurban joined
08:29
rurban joined
08:31
rurban1 joined
08:40
basiliscos joined
09:33
rurban joined
09:47
Psyche^ joined
10:33
rurban joined
11:09
agre joined
11:34
rurban joined
12:35
FROGGS joined
12:36
rurban joined
12:56
rurban joined
13:00
Chirag joined
13:37
bighugedog joined
14:03
rurban joined
18:00
Chirag joined
|
|||
| Chirag | rurban: Hey! | 18:08 | |
| rurban_ | Hey. did you see? | 18:17 | |
| And I think we can delete our branches now. Next steps | 18:19 | ||
| Chirag | yes I saw | 18:22 | |
| but I am finding many more | |||
| I am not making any changes just noting them down | 18:23 | ||
| Coke | opbots, trust Chirag | 18:27 | |
| slavorg | Ok | ||
| rurban_ | put them in a new branch please. I'll test them. | 18:33 | |
| Chirag | alright.. | ||
| rurban_ | git branch -d <branch>; git push origin :<branch> | ||
| to delete it locally and remote | 18:34 | ||
| There's still time to put more optimizations in until Saturday | |||
| Chirag | yeah.. i am trying to check all again | 18:35 | |
| I deleted from my repo(origin) but I dont have permissions for parrot's repo(upstream) | 18:44 | ||
| rurban_ | just push it to yours | 18:49 | |
| Chirag | i did that | ||
| but it still shows in parrot/parrot | |||
| rurban_ | done | 18:50 | |
| you can add a 3 for the new WB optims | |||
| Chirag | i can name it anything? | 18:52 | |
| rurban_ | well, ZYROz/pmc2_orig3-gh1069 would be nice. Something with optim_wb? | 18:54 | |
| We'll delete it anyway soon | |||
| Chirag | i ll keep that.. | 18:55 | |
| rurban_ | Only if we don't delete it (stalled old work) they name should reflect somehow the context. So it's good to have the gh#issue in it | ||
| Chirag | ok.. | 18:56 | |
| there are some sure shot optims but i am not sure about some METHODS | |||
| rurban_ | Just look at the generated C then | ||
| Basically they are all :write, but you can mark them as not (:manual|no_wb) | 18:57 | ||
| And they have all RETURN, no return. Which is good | 18:58 | ||
| Chirag | but all RETURNS would be doing a manual_wb | ||
| rurban_ | no. if you annotate it with :manual_wb no WB will be added there | 19:02 | |
| I think so. need to check | |||
| technically :no_wb and :manual_wb are the same, WBs are not inserted automatically | 19:03 | ||
| It's just better for the eye. Does not need vs have it already | |||
| Chirag | yes | ||
| rurban_ | And there's a third option. Just add the WB ine or in a comment manually, and pmc2c will detect it and mark as :manual_wb | 19:04 | |
| Needs to be added to the docs... | |||
|
19:04
bighugedog joined
|
|||
| Chirag | hmm | 19:05 | |
| I will make two commits... One with all the ones I am sure of and the other for all the METHODS... then u can check and comment | |||
| actually the fact that all METHODS are :write helps.. | 19:06 | ||
| rurban_ | sure | 19:11 | |
| Chirag | i was wondering why sort() and reverse() need a WB | 19:12 | |
| rurban_ | METHOD's are really special cases, like MULTI also. | ||
| You need to improve them in the nest task. signature handling, in pmc2c | |||
| Should be even easier than the WBs | 19:13 | ||
| Chirag | When do I start with that? | ||
| rurban_ | When you got time :) | ||
| Let's look over the WB's first | 19:14 | ||
| Chirag | I have no other priorities.. | ||
| :) | |||
| ya I am looking at them now | |||
| rurban_ | It will not be ready for 6.5.0 for sure. But maybe 6.6.0 | ||
| Chirag | Will you be creating another issue# for this task? | 19:16 | |
| rurban_ | Yes, just too busy with other stuff now | 19:17 | |
| Chirag | sure.. np.. will continue with the WBs | 19:18 | |