|
Parrot 2.6.0 | parrot.org Log: irclog.perlgeek.de/parrot/today | Nopaste: nopaste.snit.ch:8001 | merge html_cleanup (talk to Coke), merge gc_* branches, fix/replace/optimize hashing Set by moderator on 10 August 2010. |
|||
|
00:00
Psyche^ joined
|
|||
| plobsing | does parrot's core have any thread-local storage strategy beyond "just shove another member into interp"? | 00:06 | |
|
00:20
kid51 joined,
luben joined
|
|||
| darbelo | plobsing: parrot's core doesn't have functional threads, right now. | 00:25 | |
| mikehh | All tests PASS (pre/post-config, make corevm/make coretest, test, fulltest) at r48495 - Ubuntu 10.04 amd64 (g++ with --optimize) | 00:26 | |
|
00:28
preflex joined
|
|||
| plobsing | darbelo: I'm just looking for a better way to do what IMCC's imc_info does now. | 00:32 | |
|
00:49
simcop2387 joined
|
|||
| darbelo | plobsing: whiteknight's gsoc student (Chandon, I think) was working on threads, he might have some idea. | 00:58 | |
| whiteknight | eh? | 01:28 | |
| dalek | rrot: r48496 | jkeenan++ | trunk/t/native_pbc (4 files): (Once again ...) Run tools/dev/mk_packfile_pbc to update t/native_pbc files for Darwin/PPC. |
01:29 | |
| rrot: r48497 | jkeenan++ | trunk/src/pmc/callcontext.pmc: [codingstd] Insert POD 'item' so that documentor will know where to add |
|||
| plobsing | whiteknight: any ideas about how a core parrot component (eg: packfile reading) should go about caching re-usable objects (I'm thinking some kind of thread-local cache) | 01:31 | |
| but I'm not sure if we have anything like that | |||
| whiteknight | we don't have anything like that now, no. I think that kind of stuff is a little bit tangential to what Chandon has been doing in his project | ||
| I think he's put some consideration towards it, but he's had other projects to work on first | 01:32 | ||
| plobsing | cool | ||
| whiteknight | in short, it's obviously something we want. We just aren't there yet | 01:33 | |
| plobsing | the root problem that I'm trying to solve is that we allocate 1 ImageIO (and 1 RPA) for every PBC constant we thaw. Rakudo thaws 10s maybe 100s of thousands of these. If we could somehow reuse the ImageIO we could probably get a pretty big win. | 01:34 | |
| whiteknight | purl msg Chandon people are very interested in your project. I don't know what your plans are, but a writeup about what all you've accomplished this summer, what else you think needs to get done, and how you think other interested developers can get involved (and there ARE several) would be very awesome. | 01:37 | |
| purl | Message for chandon stored. | ||
| whiteknight | plobsing: yes, anytime we can cache/reuse a PMC like that it could be a win | 01:38 | |
| plobsing | btw, when we're allocating these, the GC is off. | ||
| whiteknight | of course, some of that win is lost over long program runs by having to mark those PMCs for each GC run, so we really need some kind of generational GC to mark those kinds of PMCs as long-lived | 01:39 | |
| ok | |||
|
01:41
rurban_ joined
|
|||
| darbelo | whiteknight: if you know the precise lifetime of the PMC you could allocate it in a constant pool and deallocate manually. | 01:42 | |
| plobsing | darbelo: is this strategy documented or used anywhere? this might be something I could use. | 01:44 | |
| whiteknight | darbelo: maybe, but the constant pool is pretty well disliked and we can't rely on it being around forever. A way to anchor a live PMC and move it to a rarely-scanned generation would be best | ||
| dalek | rrot: r48498 | jkeenan++ | trunk/src/pmc/class.pmc: Insert POD 'item' so that documentor will know where to add PMC function documentation. In several places, convert inline comments to POD. |
01:46 | |
| darbelo | plobsing: See Parrot_pmc_new_temporary(), line 637 of src/pmc.c | 01:47 | |
| whiteknight | temporaries are a little dangerous. They are not intended for any PMC which has a lifespan more than a C function | 01:48 | |
| darbelo | True, but a similar strategy could be applied to 'manually managed' PMCs. | 01:49 | |
| plobsing | what is wrong with yacc that causes every ~1/10 of my complete rebuilds to generate complete garbage in compilers/imcc/imcparser.c? | 01:55 | |
| darbelo | Are you running configure with --maintainer ? | 01:56 | |
| plobsing | yes | ||
| darbelo | Oh, wait. You are *hacking* on IMCC. Sorry, nevermind. | 01:57 | |
| plobsing | I'm not right now. I do on occasion, so I have parrot-config aliased appropriately. | 01:58 | |
| dalek | rrot: r48499 | jkeenan++ | trunk/src/pmc/eval.pmc: [codingstd] Insert POD 'item' so that documentor will know where to add |
02:03 | |
| mikehh | rakudo (9e1bcd4) builds on parrot r48495 - make test PASS, make stresstest (pugs r31999) PASS - Ubuntu 10.04 amd64 (g++ with --optimize) | 02:06 | |
|
02:09
simcop2387 joined
|
|||
| mikehh | kid51: how are we doin' on pmc docs, haven't looked for a couple of days? | 02:09 | |
| darbelo | Hm. I guess over half an hour to compile rakudo is too high a price for building unde 300mb of RAM. | 02:12 | |
| kid51 | darbelo: See rt.perl.org for [perl #76828] | 02:13 | |
| For me rakudo* failed to build on my venerable iBook G4, 256mb phys mem -- although it perl6 was certainly building on Parrot 2 years ago | 02:14 | ||
| Also, see my recent post to parrot-dev list on this subject | |||
| plobsing | kid51: do static functions need POD doc? | 02:15 | |
| darbelo | I'm kid51 I've seen it. And I'm also, kind of, working on it. | ||
| kid51 | plobsing: I assume all those PMC docs need documentation unless someone provides a good reason otherwise. | 02:16 | |
| mikehh | darbelo: my build took real 4m4.350s, user 4m40.460s, sys 0m4.610s | ||
| kid51 | If you have such a good reason, you should post in trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1726 | 02:17 | |
| plobsing | as far as I'm concerned, static functions are implementation details. | ||
| kid51 | Please post in that TT. I'm just going thru the ticket that mikehh created for me :-) | ||
| mikehh | darbelo: stresstest - real 22m13.218s, user 71m14.060s, sys 2m17.160s | ||
| darbelo | mikehh: On my box, the 'branch point' is 6min or so, current branch time is a bit under 8mins, after that last failed tune up, it took over half an hour. | ||
| I'm mostly using the rakudo build as stress test for pool compacting :) | 02:18 | ||
| kid51 | mikehh: As posted in TT #1726, I've been going thru the .pmc files claimed to be deficient re docs by t/coding_std/pmc_docs.t. | ||
| I've been adding the POD =item headers, which (most of the time) converts the function from "missing documentation" to "boilerplate only." | 02:19 | ||
| dalek | rrot: r48500 | jkeenan++ | trunk/src/pmc/imageio.pmc: Insert POD 'item' so that documentor will know where to add PMC function documentation. In several places, convert inline comments to POD. |
02:20 | |
| kid51 | And then I've been emailing our various contributors to request assistance. | ||
| Hence, plobsing's question, which is probably a reaction to the email I've sent him! :-) | |||
| For the time being, I'll let others argue over what our PMC function documentation standard *ought* to be. | 02:21 | ||
| I'm just trying to make the documentors' job easier. | |||
| mikehh: But t/codingstd/pmc_docs.t, which is pretty much a clone of c_function_docs.t, has some problems. | 02:22 | ||
| Functions whose signatures are more than 100 characters (I think) or functions whose first lines or signatures we have broken into two+ lines to pass the linelength.t test, are still characterized as "missing" rather than boilerplate. | 02:23 | ||
| mikehh | kid51: in what area, I do know it is requires "exact" documentation? | 02:24 | |
| kid51 | mikehh: Which 'it' are you referring to? | ||
| mikehh | kid51: documentation, the line beeak apears to be 80 characters | 02:25 | |
| break | |||
| darbelo | kid51: For the record, I think static functions in PMC files *shouldn't* have POD documentation. They should be documented, yes, but not in POD. | 02:26 | |
| kid51 | So, pmc_docs.t is an imperfect tool. | ||
| mikehh | for the pod documentation | ||
| kid51 | darbelo: Can you post that in TT #1726? | ||
| mikehh | in terms of the header item it seems to break lines at 80 characters c_function_docs.t at least | 02:27 | |
| darbelo | kid51: Will do. | ||
| kid51 | darbelo, plobsing: If the consensus is that static functions in PMCs should not have POD, then we will try to change the tool to take that into account. | 02:28 | |
| But, suggestions for modifying the coding standards have to start on TT or on list. | |||
| mikehh | we should bring that up as the #ps meeting for a decision on it | 02:29 | |
| kid51 knows very little personally about the structure/content of .pmc files ... but | |||
| kid51 does know how to insert POD formatting code! | 02:30 | ||
| Are static functions in PMCs the same as static functions in C? | 02:31 | ||
| plobsing | yes. pmc2c just passes them through. | ||
| kid51 | In the meantime, if there are any "non-static" functions in the .pmc files we asked you to take a look at, please try to write a few sentences of documentation for them. | 02:32 | |
| And if you feel like substituting /* */ comments for POD =item for the static functions, please do so. | |||
| The main point is to make our source code more readily accessible to the next generation of Parrot developers, e.g., next year's GSOC students! | 02:33 | ||
| plobsing | I understand that, but I see POD docs as documentation for people who just want to *use* the PMCs, without opening up the files. | 02:35 | |
| comment documentation for people actually editing the files. | |||
| mikehh | we seem to require pod documentation for static functions with c_function_docs.t | 02:36 | |
| kid51 | Well, post all your feelings about this issue in the TT. | ||
| plobsing | I already made a short comment. | 02:37 | |
| kid51 | Yes, just got it. Thanks. | ||
| mikehh | I am pretty sure that the coding standards were set up to make sure that functions were documented. both for the user and maintainer | 02:45 | |
| we had too many instances of NO documentation at all | 02:46 | ||
| plobsing | Yes, but what is signal to one is noise to the other and vice-versa. POD vs comments is a good way to create two communication channels. | ||
| mikehh | trying to fix a problem often comes with gah what is that function for | 02:47 | |
| perhaps for later, at this stage we need to enforce some documentation standard | 02:48 | ||
|
02:48
janus joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | is there any way in PIR to assign a key literal to a register? | 02:49 | |
| mikehh | and testing for the existance of documentation is difficult at any time, with some standard you at least can say there is SOME documentation | 02:50 | |
| dalek | rrot: r48501 | plobsing++ | trunk (4 files): move cursor management into Parrot_{freeze,thaw}_pbc |
02:53 | |
| mikehh | with the tests in c_function_docs.t and now pmc_docs.t we can at least test that every function has some (or not) documentation. | ||
| It is not perfect,by any means, but better than nothing | 02:54 | ||
| kid51 | mikehh: Agreed. | ||
| mikehh: Let's assume for the moment that all those POD =item markers I've been putting into .pmc files for the past couple of days -- or more precisely, those near 'static' functions -- are not the best approach ... | 02:55 | ||
| ... nonetheless, more than 97% of those static functions have neither inline comments nor POD. | 02:56 | ||
| plobsing | that's fair. | ||
| I'm also not sure how PDDs are supposed to factor into this. | 02:57 | ||
| mikehh | kid51: definately - at some later stage we can maybe look at other methods of checking for documentation, at the moment we at least have something | 02:58 | |
|
02:58
preflex joined
|
|||
| kid51 must sleep | 03:00 | ||
| purl | Sleep is for the weak. | ||
| kid51 | purl forget sleep | ||
| purl | kid51: I forgot sleep | ||
| whiteknight | has something changed recently with library loading? | 03:04 | |
| dalek | rrot: r48502 | mikehh++ | trunk/src/pmc/class.pmc: fix codetest failure - trailing whitespace |
03:26 | |
| whiteknight | bah. I don't know what happened, but I am suddenly unable to loadlib my library | 03:38 | |
| Tene | whiteknight: ask strace to show you where it's looking, and if it was found. | 03:49 | |
| whiteknight | Tene: I'm tracking it down. I think there's an error in my lib | 03:50 | |
| Tene | ahh | ||
| whiteknight | pmc2c-- was silently breaking one of my dynpmcs, which I think was creating a dynpmc without all the exported symbols defined | 03:51 | |
| Tene | ack | 03:52 | |
| mikehh | All tests PASS (pre/post-config, make corevm/make coretest, test, fulltest) at r48502 - Ubuntu 10.04 amd64 (gcc with --optimize) | 03:54 | |
|
03:58
Coke left
|
|||
| dalek | rrot-linear-algebra: 2694048 | Whiteknight++ | src/rakudo/nummatrix2d.pm: jot down a quick wrapper for NumMatrix2D for Rakudo. I haven't tested it and |
04:09 | |
| rrot-linear-algebra: 3489a10 | Whiteknight++ | (2 files): update the rakudo class, and add a short example file proving that at least some |
|||
| rrot-linear-algebra: d51befe | Whiteknight++ | src/pmc/pmcmatrix2d.pmc: fix a build warning/error in pmcmatrix2d |
|||
| rrot-linear-algebra: 4f25fcb | Whiteknight++ | s (4 files): add a new MatrixProxy type, which is going to facilitate lvalue postcircumfix:<[ and converts scalar get/set on the proxy to keyed get/set on the matrix |
|||
| rrot-linear-algebra: 9bd9299 | Whiteknight++ | src/pmc/complexmatrix2d.pmc: add stub zgemm wrappers to ComplexMatrix2D. Commented out because it doesn't |
|||
| whiteknight | Rakudo is going to have a full-fledged linear algebra module soon, with ever-expanding interfaces to BLAS | 04:11 | |
| The rest of the language might be slow, but it's matrix multiplications are going to be hella fast | |||
| but, it's after midnight now, so it's time for bed. Goodnight | 04:12 | ||
|
04:12
simcop2387 left
|
|||
| dalek | rrot-linear-algebra: 9db7bcd | Whiteknight++ | .gitignore: update .gitignore to ignore generated files in src/nqp |
04:15 | |
| mikehh | rakudo (9e1bcd4) builds on parrot r48502 - make test PASS, make stresstest (pugs r31999) PASS - Ubuntu 10.04 amd64 (gcc with --optimize) | 04:25 | |
| dalek | rrot: r48503 | mikehh++ | trunk/src/pmc/bigint.pmc: correct =item to pass boilerplate only in pmc_docs.t |
05:08 | |
|
05:13
Coke joined
|
|||
| Coke | Does nqp-rx have a version of PGE::Util::split? | 05:13 | |
| nevermind, moving to list. gnight. | 05:18 | ||
|
05:18
Coke left
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r48504 | mikehh++ | trunk/src/pmc/callcontext.pmc: correct =item(s) to pass boilerplate only in pmc_docs.t |
05:24 | |
| rrot: r48505 | mikehh++ | trunk/src/pmc/class.pmc: correct =item(s) to pass boilerplate only in pmc_docs.t |
|||
| rrot: r48506 | mikehh++ | trunk/src/pmc/eval.pmc: correct =item to pass boilerplate only in pmc_docs.t |
|||
|
05:36
ingy joined
|
|||
| mikehh enough for now - need a break, more later | 05:54 | ||
| dalek | rrot: r48507 | mikehh++ | trunk/src/pmc/integer.pmc: add documentation to pass pmc_docs.t |
05:57 | |
| rrot: r48508 | mikehh++ | trunk/t/codingstd/pmc_docs.t: remove src/pmc/integer.pmc from TODO list of pmc_docs.t |
|||
| kudo: 8455499 | pmichaud++ | (17 files): Merge branch 'master' into range |
06:06 | ||
| kudo: e8f2c6b | pmichaud++ | src/core/Range (2 files): A few more Range updates for Whatever, .from, .to, .bounds. |
|||
| kudo: 3f202d5 | pmichaud++ | src/core/ (3 files): More range improvements. All spectests pass. |
|||
| kudo: 6be4293 | pmichaud++ | src/core/Range.pm: No longer need separate checks for +/- Inf in Range. |
|||
|
06:19
whiteknight joined
06:25
robin-gvx joined
06:48
fperrad joined
07:13
jsut_ joined
08:11
jsut joined
09:41
rurban_ joined
10:33
barney joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r48509 | barney++ | trunk/examples/languages/squaak/doc/tutorial_episode_1.pod: Worked on episode 1 of the Squaak tutorial. |
10:39 | |
|
10:39
lucian joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r48510 | barney++ | trunk/examples/languages/squaak/doc/tutorial_episode_2.pod: Fixed name of executable and name of pod file. |
10:55 | |
| rrot: r48511 | barney++ | trunk/examples/languages/squaak/doc/tutorial_episode_1.pod: Rectified error: installable_squaak compiles to PIR, not PBC. |
|||
|
11:52
preflex joined
11:58
lucian joined
|
|||
| mikehh | All tests PASS (pre/post-config, make corevm/make coretest, test, fulltest) at r48511 - Ubuntu 10.04 amd64 (g++) | 12:08 | |
|
12:19
whiteknight joined
|
|||
| dalek | kudo: 10041cb | (Solomon Foster)++ | src/core/ (2 files): Implement infix:ļæ½<=>ļæ½(Num, Num), infix:ļæ½cmpļæ½(Num, Num), and On the plus side, this knocks about 10% off the execution time of Range iteration on Nums. (It's still mysteriously about 50% slower than Range iteration on Ints.) On the minus side, all of these functions are violating the spec by not using the Order enum. |
12:20 | |
| rrot: r48512 | mikehh++ | trunk/src/pmc/bignum.pmc: add documentation to pass pmc_docs.t |
12:35 | ||
| rrot: r48513 | mikehh++ | trunk/t/codingstd/pmc_docs.t: remove src/pmc/bignum.pmc from TODO list of pmc_docs.t |
|||
|
12:42
kid51 joined
|
|||
| kid51 | mikehh: Did you stay up all night writing documentation? | 12:44 | |
| (I had sent emails to several committers requesting their efforts.) | 12:45 | ||
|
12:48
jan joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r48514 | mikehh++ | trunk/src/pmc/packfile.pmc: add documentation to pass pmc_docs.t |
12:51 | |
| rrot: r48515 | mikehh++ | trunk/t/codingstd/pmc_docs.t: remove src/pmc/packfile.pmc from TODO list of pmc_docs.t |
|||
| mikehh | kid51: not all night - got a nap of about 4 hours | 13:07 | |
| dalek | rrot: r48516 | mikehh++ | trunk/src/pmc/orderedhash.pmc: add documentation to pass pmc_docs.t |
13:08 | |
| rrot: r48517 | mikehh++ | trunk/t/codingstd/pmc_docs.t: remove src/pmc/orderedhash.pmc from TODO list of pmc_docs.t |
|||
| mikehh | kid51: about 3 files left with Undocumented functions:, going to leave it you for a bit, need to look at html_cleanup branch | 13:15 | |
| kid51 | mikehh: Well, my hope was that writing docs would not fall to just the Cage Cleaners. That's why I've sent email to about a dozen commiters requesting their help. | 13:17 | |
| Infinoid | mikehh++ | 13:19 | |
| mikehh | kid51: I put in some documentation where I thought I understood what was happening, and got caught up, but enough of that for now for me, just making sure I didn't break anything | 13:20 | |
| whiteknight | kid51: ping | 13:29 | |
|
13:31
barney joined
|
|||
| dalek | TT #1744 created by whiteknight++: load_language "nqp" fails | 13:31 | |
| TT #1744: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1744 | |||
|
13:50
macroron joined
|
|||
| mikehh | All tests PASS (pre/post-config, make corevm/make coretest, test, fulltest) at r48517 - Ubuntu 10.04 amd64 (g++ with --optimize) | 13:50 | |
| mikehh gotta go to a local LUG meetin' - bbl | 13:51 | ||
| whiteknight | purl msg Austin in kakapo's unit tests, I would like a way to prove that a test runs to completion. I had a series of tests that were exiting early, but weren't failing any assertions so I didn't know about it | 13:59 | |
| purl | Message for austin stored. | ||
| moritz | whiteknight: don't you have a test plan? | 14:15 | |
| whiteknight | moritz: kakapo's tests are modeled on xunit | 14:24 | |
| each test is a function, the test "passes" unless an assertion is failed | 14:25 | ||
| moritz | hm | ||
|
14:26
bacek joined
|
|||
| bacek | aloha, humans | 14:26 | |
|
14:28
aloha joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | good morning, bacek | 14:32 | |
| bacek | whiteknight, it's about 10 pm here :) | ||
| clock? | |||
| purl | bacek: LAX: Sun 7:32am PDT / CHI: Sun 9:32am CDT / NYC: Sun 10:32am EDT / LON: Sun 3:32pm BST / BER: Sun 4:32pm CEST / IND: Sun 8:02pm IST / TOK: Sun 11:32pm JST / SYD: Mon 12:32am EST / | ||
| whiteknight | bacek: it's morning somewhere | ||
| bacek | whiteknight, indeed | ||
|
14:33
JimmyZ joined
14:52
jan joined
14:56
ruoso joined
|
|||
| arnsholt | in PIR, .return () returns a NULL PMC, right? | 15:00 | |
|
15:01
lucian joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | arnsholt: I don't know. I don't think it returns anything | 15:03 | |
| arnsholt | Ah. That probably explains the weirdness I'm seeing | 15:05 | |
| Or not. More continuation weirdness. Yay | 15:06 | ||
|
15:14
theory joined
15:15
darbelo joined
|
|||
| dalek | kudo: 21f3104 | moritz++ | build/PARROT_REVISION: bump PARROT_REVISION to get some testing after the merge of the parrot |
15:16 | |
| kudo: 869b1fc | moritz++ | src/core/ (2 files): Merge branch 'master' of github.com:rakudo/rakudo |
|||
|
15:21
ruoso joined
|
|||
| dalek | kudo: f100e9d | pmichaud++ | src/core/ (3 files): Using double-angles around 'cmp' makes them harder to find (e.g., with ack). |
15:39 | |
|
15:43
theory joined
15:57
gunnar_ joined
16:08
khairul joined
16:18
lucian joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | whre can I find information about community repositories on github? | 16:19 | |
| *where | |||
|
16:22
lucian joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | nm, I found it. | 16:27 | |
| arnsholt | Is a continuation supposed to reset registers to the value they had, or are subsequent changes supposed to remain? | 16:44 | |
|
16:56
ruoso joined
17:48
whiteknight joined
19:22
tcurtis joined
|
|||
| darbelo | Okay, I think that's about as far as I'm going to get with compact_pool. Meh. | 19:37 | |
| dalek | kudo: c4b6df5 | (Solomon Foster)++ | src/core/ (2 files): Move the infix:ļæ½<=>ļæ½(Numeric, Numeric) logic into infix:<cmp>(Numeric, infix:<cmp>(Numeric, Numeric). Also implement both infix:<cmp>(Real, Real) and infix:ļæ½<=>ļæ½(Real, Real) in terms of infix:<cmp>. |
19:38 | |
| sorear | arnsholt: depends on the implementation of continuations | 19:45 | |
|
20:10
gbacon joined
|
|||
| arnsholt | sorear: Well, Parrot's continuations, in this case | 20:21 | |
| Parrot as is doesn't restore them. I was wondering if that is as specced or not | 20:23 | ||
| darbelo | I think there was a ticket for a spec clarification on that. Don't know if it was acted upon. | 20:24 | |
| arnsholt | Right. I'll see if I can find that, then | 20:26 | |
| darbelo | Hm, I do wonder if we really need to zero out blocks in the string pool. | 20:37 | |
| sorear | Why do we even *have* a string pool? | 20:40 | |
| darbelo | Becouse if you have to put string contents somewhere? | 20:54 | |
|
21:22
kid51 joined
|
|||
| kid51 | whiteknight: pong (very delayed) | 21:22 | |
|
21:59
davidfetter joined
|
|||
| dalek | kudo: 83b2cdf | masak++ | (3 files): [Buf] worked on &pack, .unpack and .encode * The directives they know about: A H C S L n N v V x * .encode now recognizes its $encoding parameter * It can handle utf-8 (default), latin-1, and ascii |
22:19 | |
|
22:26
hercynium joined
|
|||
| cotto | msg khairul The User Guide should define the terms it uses like "probe" and "instrument", but in general any term that someone interested in your project might not think of in the same way you do. | 22:33 | |
| purl | Message for khairul stored. | ||
| cotto | botsnack | 22:34 | |
| purl | :) | ||
| cotto | iaieqwjenlkjavhhewkihewqirhewbotsnackqwuerkjwqnlkdfljlaksjkbwlkelgal;ldf | 22:41 | |
| purl | :) | ||
| jnthn | thebotsnackered | 22:43 | |
| purl | :) | ||
|
23:04
dngor joined
23:06
workbench joined
23:18
chromatic joined,
s1n joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | kid51: when you get a chance, could you take a look at #1744? I suspect it could be a very small task for somebody familiar with install_files.pl | 23:19 | |
| purl msg kid51 when you get a chance, could you take a look at #1744? I suspect it could be a very small task for somebody familiar with install_files.pl | 23:21 | ||
| purl | Message for kid51 stored. | ||
| whiteknight | incoming | 23:22 | |
| purl | duck! | ||
| dalek | rrot-linear-algebra: 2f9f3d6 | Whiteknight++ | : <pre>m src/pmc/nummatrix2d.pmc </pre> <pre style='white-space:pre-wrap;width:81ex'>Found a bug where iterate_function_ didn't respect transpose state, and the result matrices were wrong. Added two tests for the new behavior, though only nummatrix is tested to actually pass the test now</pre> |
23:33 | |
| rrot-linear-algebra: 1d88c1c | Whiteknight++ | : <pre>m examples/nummatrix2d.rakudo.pm </pre> <pre style='white-space:pre-wrap;width:81ex'>more updates to my rakudo experiment. More things are working now with a custom BUILD submethod instead of a new method</pre> |
|||
| rrot-linear-algebra: f53324f | Whiteknight++ | : <pre>+ t/run_test.pir <pre style='white-space:pre-wrap;width:81ex'>add a run_test.pir, which is like the old nqp-based run_test, except it actually works</pre> |
|||
| rrot-linear-algebra: 7193842 | Whiteknight++ | : <pre>m setup.pir <pre style='white-space:pre-wrap;width:81ex'>I hate when distutils strips debug symbols from the generated binary. Force a flag which always prevents that</pre> |
|||
| rrot-linear-algebra: 695e0f6 | Whiteknight++ | : <pre>m src/pmc/nummatrix2d.pmc <pre style='white-space:pre-wrap;width:81ex'>fix nummatrix2d.iterate_function_inplace to iterate row-major</pre> |
|||
| rrot-linear-algebra: 6a845b4 | Whiteknight++ | : <pre>m t/testlib/matrixtest.nqp <pre style='white-space:pre-wrap;width:81ex'>The iteration method tests in matrixtest.nqp were all silently failing and I didn't know it. calling return() inside the -> lambda returns from the method, without ever hitting the assertions. Instead of -> lambdas, use nested subs, which handle return just fine. Also, avoid use of newclosure where not needed</pre> |
|||
| rrot-linear-algebra: 2c2eaf1 | Whiteknight++ | : <pre>m t/testlib/matrixtest.nqp <pre style='white-space:pre-wrap;width:81ex'>fix pmcmatrix to pass all the new tests. Start fixing complexmatrix, though it's still failing in weird ways</pre> |
|||
| darbelo | (html commits)-- | 23:54 | |
| chromatic | darbelo, did you see my patch on the list? | ||
| darbelo | chromatic: No. Looking now. | 23:55 | |