|
Parrot 3.10.0 "Apple Pi" | parrot.org | Log: irclog.perlgeek.de/parrot | #parrotsketch meeting Tuesday 19:30 UTC Set by moderator on 2 December 2011. |
|||
|
00:19
davidfetter joined
02:13
benabik joined
02:34
silug joined
|
|||
| cotto | ~~ | 02:48 | |
|
02:50
silug joined
03:38
Psyche^ joined
03:55
davidfetter_ joined
|
|||
| dukeleto | ~~ | 04:11 | |
| is trac readonly? | |||
| benabik | dukeleto: whiteknight thought he had done it. | 04:20 | |
| dukeleto | benabik: i will test now | ||
| benabik: FAIL trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/2202 | 04:22 | ||
| benabik | dukeleto: sad face. But I can't fix. | ||
| dukeleto | benabik: i might be able to | ||
| benabik | dukeleto: Maybe you have too many privs and are bypassing the readonlyness? | 04:23 | |
| .. I nee no "new ticket" button. | |||
| dukeleto | blarg. | 04:24 | |
| benabik | Nor can I edit or add a comment to #2202 | ||
| dukeleto | benabik: i am an admin | ||
| benabik: so perhaps it is only read-only for non-admins | |||
| benabik: which is better than nothing | |||
| benabik | dukeleto: Yeah. You're too awesome to be denied write access. | ||
| I also see no edit button on the wiki. Woo | 04:25 | ||
| dalek | TT #2202 created by dukeleto++: PLEASE NO, LET TRAC BE READ-ONLY!!!! | 04:29 | |
| TT #2202: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/2202 | |||
|
06:07
jsut joined
08:16
bacek joined
08:33
mj41 joined
09:33
mj41 joined
|
|||
| dalek | kudo/nom: f365ad3 | moritz++ | src/Perl6/Actions.pm: pass a Match object to create_signature_object, so that we can fail correctly previously, sub f(:$x, :x(:$y)) { } died incorrectly, because it tried to call method CURSOR on an RPA |
09:51 | |
|
10:03
Maddingue joined
10:04
elmex joined,
benabik joined,
perlite joined
10:08
perlite joined
10:14
silug joined
10:37
tty234 joined
11:40
JimmyZ joined
11:47
bluescreen joined
|
|||
| dalek | kudo/fix-n-p: 879983c | moritz++ | src/Perl6/ (2 files): first shot at fixing -n and -p options the code gen still dies, it seems to expect a PAST::Block when it gets a PAST::Stmts, but I fell it is moving in the right direction |
13:11 | |
| kudo/fix-n-p: e0f24b2 | moritz++ | src/Perl6/Actions.pm: avoid error while compiling -n. Still busted at runtime |
13:30 | ||
|
13:32
mj41 joined
13:58
contingencyplan joined
14:20
mtk joined
|
|||
| dalek | kudo/fix-n-p: 26f0b39 | moritz++ | src/Perl6/Actions.pm: restore basic -n and -p functionality. jnthn++ |
14:35 | |
|
14:50
PacoAir joined
14:52
PacoAir_ joined
14:59
benabik joined
15:00
Timbus joined
15:01
ttbot joined
|
|||
| dalek | kudo/fix-n-p: 4f3e5fc | moritz++ | src/Perl6/ (2 files): try to make the $_ for -n and -p "is copy" does not seem to work :( |
15:05 | |
|
16:07
jsut_ joined
17:02
benabik joined
|
|||
| benabik | Good morning everybody! | 17:05 | |
| tadzik | good evening benabik! | 17:06 | |
| benabik | I suppose it's afternoon local time now, by a few minutes. But whatever. I have coffee! It's morning! With exclamation points! | ||
| Coke | coffee.. makes it morning? | 17:13 | |
| this may explain why I am perpetually grouchy at work! | |||
| benabik | I'm still buzzing off my first cup, so it must be morning.... Right? | 17:16 | |
|
17:16
JimmyZ joined
|
|||
| benabik | (My first cup was a triple espresso drink. :-) ) | 17:16 | |
| Coke | no espresso here. all the coffee I can drink, though. | 17:17 | |
| benabik | Here we only have a drip machine, which is kept supplied by us. I had a coupon for a free drink though and happily used it on my way in. | 17:18 | |
| (Here = at work) | |||
|
17:21
mj41 joined
|
|||
| Coke | aye, ditto. | 17:21 | |
|
17:46
alester joined
18:19
PacoAir joined
|
|||
| cotto | ~~ | 18:45 | |
|
18:54
bluescreen joined
19:01
fperrad joined
19:02
bluescreen_ joined
19:35
jsut joined
|
|||
| dalek | CT: d207a53 | benabik++ | src/disasm.winxed: disasm: Use get_repr to print Keys |
19:38 | |
|
19:47
kid51 joined
|
|||
| cotto | benabik++ | 20:04 | |
| though I like that vtable slot even less in light of 6model's use of "repr" | 20:05 | ||
| benabik | Yes, well... | 20:06 | |
| At least it works. | |||
| I'm tempted to refactor the Key PMC with fire. | |||
|
20:16
dmalcolm joined
|
|||
| cotto | benabik: you're not the first. | 20:20 | |
| Coke | talk to bacek. | 20:39 | |
| dalek | p: 08a079c | jnthn++ | src/6model/reprs/P6opaque.c: REPRS that flatten other REPRs into themselves should delegate to their copy_to. Fixes Int cloning issue found by llamarider++. |
21:28 | |
| kudo/nom: 9a7dbbe | jnthn++ | tools/build/NQP_REVISION: Bump to latest NQP revision. |
21:30 | ||
| aloha | (parrot/parrot) Issues closed : 234 (miniparrot segfault on Win64) by gerdr : github.com/parrot/parrot/issues/234 | 22:01 | |
| dalek | kudo/nom: 248eb5d | jnthn++ | src/ (2 files): Implement trait form of 'is parcel'. |
22:13 | |
| kudo/nom: 5df8b35 | jnthn++ | src/core/Parameter.pm: Start to fill out some missing bits in parameter introspection. |
|||
|
22:14
jsut joined
|
|||
| benabik | If VTABLE mark() only has "Parrot_key_mark(INTERP, SELF)", does it really need the custom mark? | 22:17 | |
| OH1 | |||
| Parrot_key_mark, not a generic mark. NM | |||
| Trying to get the string for a Key with PMC type results in an infinite loop. | 22:28 | ||
| Cloning a key that contains registers results in a key that doesn't. | 22:31 | ||
| Can I put a union inside a PMC? | 22:35 | ||
| cotto | not sure if ATTRs support that | ||
| benabik | How about void* ? | 22:36 | |
| dalek | kudo/nom: b5a5055 | jnthn++ | src/Perl6/ (2 files): Start to unbust signature literals. |
22:37 | |
| kudo/nom: 6342762 | jnthn++ | src/core/Parameter.pm: More work on parameter introspection; ensure sub-signatures are included in .perl output. |
|||
| kudo/nom: 5ccf1ab | jnthn++ | t/spectest.data: Turn on S06-signature/introspection.t. |
|||
| cotto | benabik: I'm nearly certain that'll work. | 22:38 | |
| benabik | Is there any guarantee about INTVAL size wrt void* ? :-D | ||
| Storing an INTVAL in a void* probably isn't a good idea though. | |||
| (or vice versa) | 22:39 | ||
| cotto | void* works. Some Parrot code assumes that sizeof(void*) == sizeof(INTVAL), but that's not a good assumption. | ||
| makes win64 porting hard | 22:40 | ||
| benabik | If sizeof(void*) >= sizeof(INTVAL), you can store the int in the void. :-D | ||
| (Vice versa can be a bad idea.) | |||
| For sanity's sake I'll probably leave the INVAL separate and just use a void* for the String and PMC. | 22:48 | ||
|
23:13
PacoAir_ joined
23:33
whiteknight joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | good evening, #parrot | 23:40 | |
| cotto | ~~, whiteknight | 23:50 | |
| whiteknight | hello cotto | 23:53 | |