|
Parrot 4.7.0 "Hispaniolan" | parrot.org | Log: irclog.perlgeek.de/parrot | #parrotsketch meeting Tuesday 19:30 UTC Set by moderator on 4 September 2012. |
|||
|
00:19
arnsholt joined
00:29
kid51 joined
|
|||
| rurban | Found some optimizability in the print_n and print_i ops and say variants. No need to go through STRING and various va_args | 01:30 | |
|
01:44
JimmyZ joined
|
|||
| JimmyZ | hi rurban | 01:45 | |
| rurban | hi | ||
| JimmyZ | rurban: is there any vmkit docs ? | 01:48 | |
| rurban | no idea yet. svn is empty | 01:49 | |
| JimmyZ | :( | 01:50 | |
| I think rewrite parrot with vmkit is hard too, here are no developers | 01:52 | ||
|
01:53
JimmyZ joined
|
|||
| rurban | I'll try it alone | 01:57 | |
|
01:57
mvorl joined,
mvorl left
|
|||
| rurban | Does not look too hard. | 01:57 | |
| JimmyZ can't find any document about vmkit | 02:03 | ||
| rurban | Added github.com/parrot/parrot/issues/828 | 02:06 | |
| JimmyZ | benabik: rakudo seems that it didn't use parrot's namespace and object model | 02:07 | |
| benabik | vmkit.llvm.org/publications/vmkit.html | 02:14 | |
| JimmyZ: I thought it still used our namespaces. | |||
| JimmyZ | benabik: I only see '.namespace []' in NQP.pir | 02:16 | |
| rurban | vmkit: In some paper they even mentioned explicitly perl as potential target | ||
| benabik | Oh, yeah, it uses their own stashes. | ||
| :-/ | |||
| JimmyZ | so the pain is ops and pcc | 02:17 | |
| benabik | That's Rakudo's pain. | 02:18 | |
| I think that the fact that they've replaced a lot indicates that there are more pain points than that. | |||
| MikeFair | howdy all! :) | 02:19 | |
| JimmyZ | benabik: porting parrot to 6model will reduce more pain, me thinks | ||
| benabik | JimmyZ: Yes, that would be nice. | 02:20 | |
| JimmyZ | loritor's goal is to reduce ops and pcc pain, me thinks | 02:21 | |
| MikeFair | So is VMKit a MRE on top of LLVM? | 02:22 | |
| benabik | LLVM + GC + threads | 02:23 | |
| + nice interface to JIT | |||
| MikeFair nods. | |||
| So is the question on the table about making a PASM/PIR -> VMKit port? | 02:24 | ||
| benabik | It wasn't a question so much as random ponderings, on my part. | ||
| I'm not impressed by their GC. | |||
| GC written in Java compiled to LLVM by their custom JVM... | 02:25 | ||
| MikeFair | Open Source I assume? | ||
| benabik | yar | ||
| MikeFair | The fact they have both a CLR and JVM means something about their design I think.. doesn't it? | 02:26 | |
| I imagine things like GC improve over time | 02:27 | ||
| Given effort | |||
| Initial design decisions become much harder to rewrite | |||
| benabik | That GC design is a design decision, kinda. | ||
| MikeFair | (like to add a GC concept to the product later) | ||
| benabik: Ahh | |||
| benabik: not abstracted to allow for other models? | |||
| benabik | MikeFair: Their chosen abstraction layer is in Java. | 02:28 | |
| It's the only part of the system in Java, which makes it kinda odd. | |||
| rurban | I came up with the idea on the Moose hackathon in Norway discussing parrot with pmichaud | 02:29 | |
| MikeFair | That kind of begs another question I've been having about a Parrot->Java backend -- how different is a basic Java object from a PBC | ||
| I mean they seem like much the same thing to me from my perspective | 02:30 | ||
| rurban | jonathan should know that. | ||
| MikeFair | Err PMC!!! | ||
| not PBC | |||
| benabik: So they have a JVM 'on the side' for object management for their VM? | 02:31 | ||
| benabik | MikeFair: They compile Java to Java Bytecode, then bytecode to LLVM. | 02:32 | |
| MikeFair | benabik: That's interesting, kind of makes my musing about java byte code ->parrot byte code and vice versa seem not so unreasonable | 02:33 | |
| rurban | j3 is a jvm. the execute their gc in their environment. | 02:34 | |
| benabik | I think they basically use j3 to JIT the GC. | ||
| MikeFair | yeah that makes more sense, I always thought of the GC engine as a "VM" thing, not something that would end up in my complied byte code | ||
| I mean if I dissambled the byte code for my program I might find references to "execute the GC" if I explicitly asked for it in my program, but I don't think I'll see any GC reclamation code in there | 02:36 | ||
| which means the 'algorithm' for actually doing GC comes from the execution host, not my compiled program (or in this case, their compiled java) | |||
| rurban | MikeFair: A PMC can be dynamically added, a java class not | 02:37 | |
| MikeFair | rurban: OOOOHHHHHHHHH that's an important distinction.... | ||
| rurban | So it bypasses most compiler optimizations on classes and methods | ||
| But it can still be done, recompile method resolution and isa when loaded | 02:38 | ||
| MikeFair | rurban: That doesn't make much sense to me though, I know that there are java programs that support plugin systems by adding JARs to its environment | ||
| rurban | perl5 classes have the same problem. | ||
| jar yes, but not extending classes with roles e.g. | |||
| we can extend our type system | 02:39 | ||
| MikeFair | ahhh so at runtime the types can be inherited from | ||
| and other things | |||
| rurban | yep. our main advantage over jvm and .NET | ||
| MikeFair makes a mental note to reread up on what the heck roles are again. "they sound like an important concept not in many other systems" | 02:40 | ||
| rurban: That makes total sense | |||
| rurban | I also have no good idea on roles. | ||
| MikeFair | rurban: But if you made a Java class called "PMC" what wouldthe VM care? | ||
| rurban | Though I listened to sartak's talk twice | ||
| registration with multi | 02:41 | ||
| MikeFair | I mean aren't we writing our own type inheritance system? | ||
| and our own dispatch system | |||
| I guess I'm thinking it'd end up being the same thing that those LLVM guys just did | |||
| JVM would just handle GC | 02:42 | ||
| Sorry side tracked on to Parrot on Java | |||
| :) | |||
| I'm really curious what folks thought are on this. I have noticed that the Perl6 guys seem to have rewritten everything in a language they understand -- which I think of as 6model | 02:44 | ||
| benabik / rurban: Can you guys explain to me where 6model fits in the hierarchy of technology around here - I mean why is it needed and what's the disctintion between that and whatever Parrot does now? | 02:45 | ||
| rurban | g d | 02:46 | |
| whiteknight seems to know. me not | |||
| 6model is like the perl6 mop, their object model and type system | |||
| MikeFair | I think I found an overview | 02:50 | |
| So I guess I'm left with the question is there seomthing different or "better" about Parrot's existing model? | 02:51 | ||
| I mean I can't imagine that there is anything in Perl6's object model that Parrot wouldn't want to be able to do | |||
| And if it's not a drastically different paradigm, it seems like the Parrot Object Model could rebase on 6model allowing it to take adavantage of the multiple backends that the Perl6 guys are targeting which would be "good" I think, right? | 02:53 | ||
| rurban | I have no idea, sorry | ||
| MikeFair | yeah, kind of hard to get a read on something from the outside looking in :) | ||
| rurban | But we seem to take 6model, whiteknight will be working on it as soon as threads land. | ||
| MikeFair | Yeah ok, that seems consistent with other things I've been seeing, like the new NQP being 6model based | 02:54 | |
| It also seems kind of cool that it's going back and forth Parrot Object model guys bootstrap, discover limitations, Perl6 guys augment and create a new larger paradigm with seemingly more desirable features, Parrot guys wilthen consume and extend it again (perhaps?) and the cycle continues :) | 02:57 | ||
| rurban | That's a normal bootstrapping cycle | 02:58 | |
| It's just that the project started 2001, not 2010 | |||
| MikeFair | agreed | ||
| rurban | The problem is there is not much progress in parrot, while there is a lot in perl6. | 02:59 | |
| MikeFair | Releted to the Compiler Toolkit, any idaes why I can't seem to match \\n character? | ||
| \\n nor $$ seem to ever find anything | 03:00 | ||
| sorear | nqp: say("x" ~~ /\\n/) | 03:01 | |
| p6eval | nqp: OUTPUTĀ«ā¤Ā» | ||
| sorear | nqp: say("\\n" ~~ /\\n/) | ||
| p6eval | nqp: OUTPUTĀ«ā¤ā¤Ā» | ||
| rurban | I'm not good in parsing, sorry | ||
| sorear | seems \\n does match | ||
| MikeFair | AHA!!! | 03:04 | |
| MikeFair whacks head. | |||
| \\s+ matches \\n | |||
| So <.ws> was sucking it up | |||
| At least according to what I'm seeing in S05 | |||
| JimmyZ | I'm trying make cover parrot by run rakudo, to see how much parrot codes rakudo uses | 03:06 | |
| MikeFair | there's new \\h and \\v sequences where \\v equals "Vertical Whitespace" and \\h = "Horizontal Whitespace" (\\h == (\\s expect for the \\v stuff)) | ||
| JimmyZ: What is make cover supposed to do? | 03:07 | ||
| JimmyZ | MikeFair: see `make help` in parrot dir | ||
| rurban | rakudo itself does not use parrot, nqp does. see the pir: calls | ||
| MikeFair | soundsgood | ||
| JimmyZ | I think it's good idea to rip out parrot code that rakudo didn't use | 03:08 | |
| sorear | parrot has goals other than "run rakudo" | 03:14 | |
| JimmyZ | I hate the goal | 03:16 | |
| currently | |||
| rurban | floatval != double are totally broken, almost fixed everything in rurban/va_arg_print_n. Are there no smokers for long double and such? | 03:29 | |
| MikeFair | ok i have a strange whitespace question, it seems that I have two kinds of ws needs, sometimes I need to include \\n and othertimes I don't want to include \\n | 03:46 | |
| At least I'd like to avoid needing to hand code all the whitespace potentials | 03:47 | ||
| Could I use an embedded contextual to make this work? | |||
| Something like { ${NEWLINEOFF}=1 } <return> | 03:48 | ||
| and then in <ws> test for that? | |||
| dalek | rrot/rurban/va_arg_print_n: 85d9301 | rurban++ | / (3 files): [GH# 828] Avoid passsing non-double through va_list va_list does not support float, long double nor __float128 on most systems. Promote FLOATVAL to double to avoid that. |
04:21 | |
| rrot/rurban/va_arg_print_n: 6f0e533 | rurban++ | / (7 files): [GH #828] Fix most tests for non-double floatval Add more needed precisions to numeric tests, tested with intel long double. Change a magic number in t/library/test_more.t 888.81<=>888.82 1e-2 was not stable enough for intel long double Use t/pmc/testlib/annotations.pbc for binary comparisons of packfiles since stringifying non-double numbers is not stable enough. Fix src/dynoplibs/sys.ops doublesize to numvalsize. This only works for double. |
|||
| rrot/rurban/va_arg_print_n: 2958219 | rurban++ | src/ops/ (2 files): [GH #828] Optimize print_n/i and say_n/i print_n/nc/i/ic and the say variants go through a full Parrot_io_printf with 3 va_start/va_end scenarios and a custom format string parser, and through char* -> STRING->char* conversion until the fixed FLOATVAL_FMT or INTVAL_FMT printf is done. Just to print a single int or number. This also lost precision for non-double floatval's - if cast to (double). Now avoided. |
|||
| rurban | all tests pass now with long double. I'll tests with other floatval types also. | 04:22 | |
|
04:25
JimmyZ joined
|
|||
| JimmyZ | rurban++ | 04:25 | |
| rurban | Nope, smokes are black. | 04:28 | |
|
05:00
mdupont joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot/threads: d351afe | rurban++ | src/pmc/task.pmc: Fix a mailbox threads race, document another threads race The mailbox threads race was improved by suggestion of nine++. TASK_recv_block_CLEAR(partner) writes concurrent with a read in !TASK_in_preempt_TEST(SELF). To repro: m parrot && ~/bin/tsan-r4356-amd64-linux-self-contained.sh ./parrot t/pmc/task.t |
05:13 | |
| rurban | get_num_cpus() tomorrow. I have no idea how to fix the documented race in TASK_recv_block_CLEAR(partner) | 05:16 | |
|
05:21
benabik joined
06:50
zby_home joined
07:26
tadzik joined
08:20
Psyche^ joined
09:39
tadzik joined
09:53
PacoAir joined
09:58
PacoAir joined
|
|||
| dalek | kudo/nom: 286df2a | moritz++ | t/spectest.data: four more passing test files (is this Christmas? :-) |
10:20 | |
|
10:46
whiteknight joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | good morning, #parrot | 10:47 | |
| tadzik | good morning whiteknight | 10:48 | |
|
11:15
JimmyZ joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | hello tadzik | 11:30 | |
| blah. Every time I look at the source of Sub PMC I'm reminded that it needs to be radically cleaned | 11:31 | ||
|
11:38
LizM joined
11:39
woolfy_ joined
|
|||
| dalek | p: 1fbc5ed | jnthn++ | src/how/NQPClassHOW.pm: Cannot use say in the meta-objects, as they are compiled without the setting. |
12:02 | |
| kudo/nom: 81edc97 | jnthn++ | src/core/control.pm: The spawnw op can in some cases throw an exception; be sure to handle it. Unbusts system.t on Windows. |
12:08 | ||
|
12:08
Ultali joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | msg nine it looks like Proxy is read-only and disallows writes. I thought there was a mechanism to schedule writes as tasks on the owner thread? | 12:08 | |
| aloha | OK. I'll deliver the message. | ||
| Ultali | neat, I was just going to ask if anyone is interested/looking at threading | 12:09 | |
| whiteknight | Ultali: if all goes will with my fixing and testing, we could merge a new threading system within the next few days | 12:10 | |
| dalek | rrot/threads: a54a581 | rurban++ | / (70 files): Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into threads |
12:15 | |
| rrot/threads: cac1aa6 | Whiteknight++ | / (7 files): Merge branch 'threads' of github.com:parrot/parrot into threads |
|||
| rrot/threads: 51d178a | Whiteknight++ | / (3 files): If we're using a Proxied CallContext as the outer ctx of a closure scheduled as a Task on a new thread, we need to de-proxy it. Create a dummy empty CallContext to serve in place of the Proxy. This fixes a segfault/assert_fail pointed out by tadzik++, although the behavior of his example is still not 100% as expected |
|||
| whiteknight | tadzik: Here's the first part of a fix for your lexicals example. Can you give it a spin and see if it's any better for you? | ||
| tadzik: the lexical variable appears to be read-only right now. I'm working on that | |||
| Ultali | whiteknight: that's amazing news | 12:17 | |
| moritz | whiteknight++ | 12:18 | |
| Ultali | I just read your blog article from April last year | ||
| tadzik | whiteknight: not really, I have to leave home quite soon | ||
| I think all my testcases are gisted, possibly someone else can try | 12:19 | ||
| whiteknight | tadzik: okay, no rush. I've got a few other things I want to play with | ||
| Ultali: you're interested in threading? | |||
| Ultali | I was just interested to see how parrot was going to manage threading in a way that might work for any scripting language that has its own threading model | 12:20 | |
| whiteknight | Ultali: So far we're just trying to provide a system with some low-level features, but we really need some use-cases to help shape it in the future | 12:22 | |
| Ultali | yeah any threading is good threading :) | ||
| whiteknight | Okay, I think I can enable cross-thread proxied writes, but I don't want to do that until I find out from nine why they're disabled in the first place | 12:25 | |
|
12:28
mdupont joined
|
|||
| dalek | p: ff65502 | jnthn++ | src/6model/reprs/P6opaque.c: Improve wording of an error. |
12:33 | |
| whiteknight | Okay, I sent nine an email asking about a few things. I've got some things to do now and I'll try to work out the last few details soon. | 12:34 | |
| unhandled exception behavior and exit behavior definitely need to change in a threaded world | 12:50 | ||
| One task having an unhandled exception shouldn't bring down the whole process, methinks | |||
| although exactly what it should do is not apparent | 12:51 | ||
| I feel like we should store the terminating exception in the Task, then unschedule the Task. | 12:55 | ||
| so that a different task can inspect and handle the error condition | |||
| but then we have to figure out what happens with the last task, and how we return error information back through the embedding API | 12:56 | ||
| (this issue wouldn't block a merge, I don't think, because it wouldn't affect existing code) | 12:57 | ||
| Ultali | is the assumption there is a progenitor main thread of execution? if so why not catch all the unhandled exceptions in the threads and then rethrow them in the main thread when the last returns | 13:09 | |
| dalek | p: 6046125 | jnthn++ | src/pmc/nqplexpad.pmc: Update NQP lexpad to support natively typed lexicals. |
13:46 | |
| p: 6878bf4 | jnthn++ | src/QAST/Compiler.nqp: Fix/improvement to type and scope handling in QAST::Compiler. |
|||
| p: 0c0bab6 | jnthn++ | src/NQP/Actions.pm: Implement natively typed lexicals. |
|||
| p: e417703 | jnthn++ | t/nqp/64-native.t: Add initial tests for native ints. |
|||
| p: 341b6d5 | jnthn++ | src/NQP/Actions.pm: Get natively typed paramters working. |
14:48 | ||
| p: 25f6e41 | jnthn++ | src/stage0/ (9 files): Update bootstrap so we can start using native types in the compiler. |
|||
| p: 105e817 | jnthn++ | src/QRegex/Cursor.nqp: Scatter some type annotations in Cursor. |
|||
|
15:19
benabik joined
|
|||
| dalek | p: c06c0e8 | jnthn++ | src/HLL/Grammar.pm: Use native types in HLL::Grammar. |
15:33 | |
| p: b7126b8 | jnthn++ | src/QRegex/NFA.nqp: Use native types in QRegex::NFA. |
|||
| kudo/nom: 5ac5f88 | jnthn++ | tools/build/NQP_REVISION: NQP version bump for better error message and a slight performance win thanks to NQP having native types. |
15:39 | ||
|
16:09
contingencyplan joined
|
|||
| rurban | Anybody has an idea what happened to Parrot_runcode()? It is still documented and used in some tests | 16:21 | |
| JimmyZ doesn't know | 16:28 | ||
| MikeFair | Howdy all! :) | 16:47 | |
| So I'm trying to figure out what this means again: | |||
| Error while compiling block : Error while compiling block : Error while compiling op if: invoke() not implemented in class 'NQPMu' | |||
| I tried to call a method on a null object | |||
| Specifically I passed in a null object as a parameter to the 'if' op? | 16:48 | ||
| arnsholt | Sounds like an NQP bug | 16:52 | |
| Try asking in #perl6 | |||
| dalek | rrot: d2ed3bb | rurban++ | t/src/extend.t: skip outdated extend tests with old embed API [GH #829] I also tried to convert extend_15 to the new API but failed to understand Parrot_runcode() |
16:54 | |
| Heuristic branch merge: pushed 49 commits to parrot/native_pbc by rurban | |||
| rurban | Oops. | 16:56 | |
|
17:02
lucian joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | Parrot_runcode? I think that's gone and I don't remember what it's replaced with | 17:02 | |
| rurban | I pushed an idea, but it fails (t/src/extend_15.c) | 17:05 | |
| I submitted a ticket for it github.com/parrot/parrot/issues/829 | |||
| Who is refactoring the debugger? | 17:06 | ||
| seen petdance | 17:10 | ||
| aloha | petdance was last seen in #parrot 508 days 15 hours ago saying "git checkout tt1931-nci-parameters-deprecation". | ||
|
17:11
travis-ci joined
|
|||
| travis-ci | [travis-ci] parrot/parrot#548 (master - d2ed3bb : Reini Urban): The build was fixed. | 17:11 | |
| [travis-ci] Change view : github.com/parrot/parrot/compare/2...ed3bb3c4c1 | |||
| [travis-ci] Build details : travis-ci.org/parrot/parrot/builds/2461260 | |||
|
17:11
travis-ci left
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: c26e17a | rurban++ | config/gen/makefiles/root.in: [cage] Makefile cover-clean. Make less noise and use echo make -s clean listed all dirs to be cleaned up for gcov-generated files. Print only one line |
17:15 | |
| rrot/threads: c36a7c5 | rurban++ | MANIFEST.generated: dynpmc/os: and now actually install it Sigh |
17:29 | ||
| rrot/threads: 216ce80 | rurban++ | MANIFEST.generated: [CAGE] remove duplicate os.bundle in MANIFEST.generated |
|||
| rrot/threads: f8e6af5 | rurban++ | MANIFEST.generated: Merge branch 'master' into threads |
|||
| rrot/threads: db4e6e5 | rurban++ | src/call/context.c: [cage] bump src/call/context.c Copyright to 2012 Parrot_pcc_unproxy_context added, plus some threads THREAD_DEBUG additions. |
|||
|
18:17
brrt joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: 4a4ec69 | rurban++ | t/src/checkdepend.t: fix bogus t/src/checkdepend.t warnings PARROT_HAS_(CORE|EXTRA)_NCI_THUNKS is in %PConfig, not %PConfig_Temp. Skip warning for src/gc/malloc.c /usr/include/malloc.h when HAVE_USR_INCLUDE_MALLOC_H is undefined. Skip warning for src/glut_nci_thunks.c glut_nci_thunks.str at all. |
18:30 | |
| rrot/threads: d2ed3bb | rurban++ | t/src/extend.t: skip outdated extend tests with old embed API [GH #829] I also tried to convert extend_15 to the new API but failed to understand Parrot_runcode() |
18:54 | ||
| rrot/threads: c26e17a | rurban++ | config/gen/makefiles/root.in: [cage] Makefile cover-clean. Make less noise and use echo make -s clean listed all dirs to be cleaned up for gcov-generated files. Print only one line |
|||
| rrot/threads: 4a4ec69 | rurban++ | t/src/checkdepend.t: fix bogus t/src/checkdepend.t warnings PARROT_HAS_(CORE|EXTRA)_NCI_THUNKS is in %PConfig, not %PConfig_Temp. Skip warning for src/gc/malloc.c /usr/include/malloc.h when HAVE_USR_INCLUDE_MALLOC_H is undefined. Skip warning for src/glut_nci_thunks.c glut_nci_thunks.str at all. |
|||
| rrot/threads: d4aeea0 | rurban++ | / (2 files): Merge branch 'master' into threads |
|||
| rrot/threads: bd80582 | rurban++ | t/src/checkdepend.t: Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into threads |
|||
| rrot/threads: 8073f66 | rurban++ | config/gen/makefiles/root.in: [cage] t/src/checkdepend.t for src/call/context add new pmc_proxy.h dep |
|||
|
19:23
lucian joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: 355cfb9 | rurban++ | lib/Parrot/Test.pm: Enable VALGRIND tests with c_output test functions E.g. POSTMORTEM=1 VALGRIND=tsan perl t/src/embed.t or VALGRIND=valgrind perl t/src/extend.t |
19:28 | |
| rrot/threads: c579751 | rurban++ | lib/Parrot/Test.pm: Enable VALGRIND tests with c_output test functions E.g. POSTMORTEM=1 VALGRIND=tsan perl t/src/embed.t or VALGRIND=valgrind perl t/src/extend.t |
19:34 | ||
| rurban | tsan is not able to reproduce benabik's threads bug in extend_19 | 19:36 | |
|
20:06
travis-ci joined
|
|||
| travis-ci | [travis-ci] parrot/parrot#551 (master - 355cfb9 : Reini Urban): The build was broken. | 20:06 | |
| [travis-ci] Change view : github.com/parrot/parrot/compare/4...5cfb9b7ffe | |||
| [travis-ci] Build details : travis-ci.org/parrot/parrot/builds/2462799 | |||
|
20:06
travis-ci left
|
|||
| dalek | p: c2b6104 | jnthn++ | src/HLL/Compiler.pm: Avoid referencing QAST::Compiler before it has been compiled (only worked due to bugs). |
20:08 | |
| p: 81a27e9 | jnthn++ | src/NQP/ (2 files): Fix separate compilation issues that busted running multiple commands in the REPL and getting at the NQP compiler through compreg from a built NQP. |
|||
| kudo/nom: 4dd1240 | jnthn++ | / (2 files): Add a missing use statement/dependency, now that a separate compilation hole is closed in NQP. |
|||
| rrot: 10f5111 | rurban++ | lib/Parrot/Test.pm: Enable VALGRIND tests with more test functions Now also pir. E.g. VALGRIND=tsan prove `find t/src -name \\*.t` |
20:20 | ||
| p: c0203bb | jnthn++ | / (2 files): Fix parsing of pointy without sig. Closes #52. |
20:22 | ||
| rrot/threads: 5412296 | rurban++ | lib/Parrot/Test.pm: Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into threads |
20:30 | ||
|
20:36
travis-ci joined
|
|||
| travis-ci | [travis-ci] parrot/parrot#552 (master - 10f5111 : Reini Urban): The build was fixed. | 20:36 | |
| [travis-ci] Change view : github.com/parrot/parrot/compare/3...f5111d8a70 | |||
| [travis-ci] Build details : travis-ci.org/parrot/parrot/builds/2463250 | |||
|
20:36
travis-ci left
21:18
NotFound joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot/rurban/va_arg_print_n: b04ce3f | rurban++ | / (4 files): [GH #828] Probe if double is needed for va_arg or if native floatval does fine Set new feature.h PARROT_VA_PTR_FLOATVAL to double or the given floatval, and use it in src/call/args.c Print "stack|register (double)" in Configure va_arg result if a cast is required and precision is lost. Still some va_arg casts missing, multidispatch.t and nci.t fail. |
22:07 | |
| rrot/rurban/va_arg_print_n: c9827b7 | rurban++ | src/ (2 files): [GH #828] Use more va_arg PARROT_VA_PTR_FLOATVAL |
|||
|
22:11
MikeFair joined
22:54
tadzik joined
22:59
benabik joined
|
|||
| rurban | nine: here? I have a little efficiency problem dynamic MAX_THREADS from Parrot_get_num_cpus(). static Interp * threads_array[MAX_THREADS] vs runtime malloced on the heap | 23:26 | |
| I think I solved it. MAX_THREADS can now be a bit higher. | 23:33 | ||
| I've used 16 and set the actual number dynamically | 23:35 | ||
| This could go as configure option or cmdline option also (--numthreads) if someone wants 4000 threads. | 23:36 | ||
| github.com/parrot/parrot/issues/830 Parrot_set_num_threads and --numthreads | 23:47 | ||
|
23:47
TonyC joined
|
|||
| rurban | g topo | 23:49 | |
|
23:54
nopaste joined
|
|||