|
Parrot 5.6.0 "Psittacosaurus" | parrot.org/ | Log: irclog.perlgeek.de/parrot | #parrotsketch meeting Tuesday 19:30 UTC Set by moderator on 3 August 2013. |
|||
|
03:43
preflex_ joined
05:49
FROGGS joined
05:58
FROGGS joined
07:08
FROGGS joined
07:22
denis_boyun joined
09:15
denisboyun joined
09:25
FROGGS joined
10:44
denisboyun joined
11:30
denisboyun joined
|
|||
| dalek | kudo/nom: a04ebf2 | jnthn++ | src/Perl6/Optimizer.nqp: Some optimizer code cleanups, commenting. |
11:59 | |
| kudo/nom: c2ef115 | jnthn++ | src/vm/parrot/guts/bind.c: Compile-time analysis of sigs with opt params. This means the optimizer doesn't trip up on protos like ($a?, $b?), meaning we can inline +, < and so forth for natives again. |
|||
|
12:31
denisboyun joined
13:03
kid51 joined
13:33
rurban joined
14:37
Psyche^ joined
14:39
FROGGS joined
15:23
benabik joined
15:26
PacoLinux joined
|
|||
| dalek | p: 8e8ae36 | (Tobias Leich)++ | src/vm/parrot/QAST/Compiler.nqp: we cant trust boxed_primitive when inlinable is false, jnthn++ |
15:28 | |
|
15:36
mtk joined
15:59
denisboyun joined
|
|||
| dalek | kudo/nom: fe0813a | jnthn++ | src/vm/jvm/runtime/org/perl6/rakudo/ (2 files): Implement compile time bind analysis on JVM. Gets compile time multiple dispatch analysis working. For some reason, inlining doesn't happen yet, though. |
16:26 | |
| kudo/nom: 59e521e | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | src/core/ (2 files): Make List.(uniq|squish) up to spec |
16:53 | ||
|
16:57
rurban joined
18:56
rurban1 joined
19:31
rurban1 joined
20:11
bluescreen joined
20:46
denis_boyun joined
20:59
perlite_ joined
21:02
rurban1 joined
|
|||
| denis_boyun | Util: Hi are you here? | 21:03 | |
|
23:27
rurban1 joined
23:31
benabik joined
|
|||
| dalek | p: d6f0f6f | jnthn++ | src/QAST/BVal.nqp: Fix QAST::BVal dumping; ruoso++. |
23:36 | |
| kudo/nom: 8d851b7 | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | src/core/List.pm: Reimplement :with for List.(uniq|squish) (keep :as available) Yes, it was removed from the spec, but the alternative for doing [eqv] based uniqueness using *.perl is 1. still not possible now (because .perl doesn't always give an accurate representation), and 2. very resource intensive, because a whole structure needs to be stringified first before being able to find out that they're different. Whereas [eqv] is very quickly able to find out whether two structures are different. So, do I believe it belongs in the spec? Yes! :-) |
23:37 | ||
|
23:57
benabik joined
|
|||