Parrot 6.5.0 "Black-winged Lovebird" | parrot.org/ | Log: irclog.perlgeek.de/parrot | #parrotsketch meeting Tuesday 19:30 UTC
Set by moderator on 17 June 2014.
01:12 cooper joined, dalek joined, bluescreen joined, FROGGS joined, woolfy joined, Coke joined, jsut_ joined, Khisanth joined, estrabd joined, cottoo joined, GeJ_ joined, woosley joined, ggherdov__ joined, dngor joined, p6eval joined, janus joined, Tene joined, sorear joined, simcop2387 joined, allison joined, smash joined, rblackwe joined 01:56 FROGGS_ joined 03:07 Chirag joined 03:14 bighugedog joined 06:47 FROGGS_ joined 06:55 Tene joined 07:43 ingy joined 07:49 basiliscos joined 11:19 bighugedog joined 13:40 bluescreen joined 13:48 rurban1 joined 14:29 FROGGS joined 14:59 Chirag joined
Chirag rurban: Hey! I was wondering if I could start working for the next overhead? 15:24
I believe that is the one with ResizeablePMCArray to FixedPMCArray? 15:25
16:06 Chirag_ joined
rurban Which ResizeablePMCArray? 16:28
I have no idea yet, would be a good target next 16:29
But I published the new benchmark numbers and added comments to the worst offenders
Chirag_ I saw the the new graph.. 16:30
rurban github.com/parrot/parrot-bench#comments
3.0 "Use Packfile PMC API to run bytecode" looks interesting 16:31
Maybe I'll bisect it to single commits
dalek website: ZYROz++ | GSoC 2014 - Report 6 16:32
website: www.parrot.org/zyroz6
rurban Problem is that rakudo is currently broken for parrot, so I cannot do more realistic benchmarks
Chirag_ oh.. 16:33
I was referring to the task I mentioned in the proposal - reallocation of the signature array (For cases with no optional or slurpy args)
but I will take a look at the one you mentioned 16:34
rurban I see. I'll check if that is a bottleneck still. Only in user provided methods, written in PIR (or perl6) 16:35
Chirag_ sure!
rurban yes, good idea
17:22 schm00ster joined 17:34 basiliscos joined 18:50 bluescreen_ joined, jsut joined 20:28 davidfetter joined 22:00 rurban1 joined 23:36 bighugedog joined 23:39 Khisanth joined