|
www.parrotcode.org/ | Last release: 0.7.1 "Manu Aloha" Set by moderator on 17 September 2008. |
|||
|
00:02
tetragon joined
00:10
AndyA joined
00:17
tetragon joined
00:43
davidfetter joined
00:55
kid51 joined
01:01
dmknopp joined
01:17
tetragon joined
|
|||
| tetragon | Argh, the first jit stack frame on my box is an unaligned length | 01:43 | |
|
02:20
tetragon joined
|
|||
| dmknopp | does any one know where the HOW method is defined for perl 6 prototypes? | 02:35 | |
|
02:35
Andy joined
02:39
Ontolog joined
03:05
tetragon joined
03:20
tetragon joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | dmknopp: technically, HOW isn't a method. | 03:45 | |
| dmknopp | ok | 03:46 | |
| im trying to wrap my brain around why I would want to use perl 6 prototype obejcts over the class op codes. It seems the class op codes give me every thing i need, but Cardinal uses the p6proto style | 03:47 | ||
| pmichaud | well, that's the way the compiler toolkit models things | 03:48 | |
| I think Cardinal is simply following that. | |||
| dmknopp | i was hoping to dig thru the code of the P6object.pbc which seems to define things. I need to create a singleton class / singleton methods | ||
|
03:48
TiMBuS joined
|
|||
| dmknopp | do you know where i could find an example | 03:48 | |
| :-) | 03:49 | ||
| pmichaud | for creating a singleton class? or for using p6object ? | ||
| dmknopp | singleton class | ||
| and for the definition of this prototype majic... so I can dig thru things if I have questions in the future | |||
| pmichaud | "protoobject" | 03:50 | |
| protoobjects are defined in Synopsis 12 | |||
| there's also a short article about them on parrotblog.org | |||
| dmknopp | is that a .pir file, i didnt see the code listed | ||
| pmichaud | no, you keep saying "prototype" but the term we tend to use is "protoobject" | ||
| dmknopp | I think I read that blog, it seemed to focus mainly on Perl6 at the HLL level | ||
| err, right, sorry | 03:51 | ||
| pmichaud | a protoobject is just an instance of the class that has some special behaviors mixed in | ||
| dmknopp | Im trying to think about my javascript experience to wrap my brain around the concept | ||
| pmichaud | I don't know that there's an analogue in javascript | ||
| dmknopp | well in javascript they follow the some object system ( I believe) | 03:52 | |
| pmichaud | they might -- haven't looked at it closely from an internals perspective (only enough to solve whatever web problem I happened to be working on at the time) | ||
| anyway, I would think that for a singleton class you'd probably want to overload "new" so that it always returns the same object. | 03:53 | ||
| and disable or overload the clone vtable method in the same way | |||
| (for those who read in scrollback... sorry, I meant "vtable function" :-) | 03:54 | ||
| dmknopp | ahh ok override the 'new', simple enough | ||
| thx | |||
| pmichaud | could also perhaps do it by overloading the init_pmc vtable function | 03:55 | |
| dmknopp | hmm... whats the best way to disable the clone :vtable | ||
| just define an empty method? .sub 'clone' :vtable .end | |||
| like so | |||
| ok init_pmc :vtable I will look into that | 03:56 | ||
| pmichaud | anyway, I have to go for a while | ||
| bbl | |||
| dmknopp | k thx for the help | 03:57 | |
|
04:01
tetragon joined
04:05
bacek_ joined
|
|||
| dmknopp | hey overriding the init :vtable did the trick, init_pmc :vtable was not called for some reeason. | 04:20 | |
|
04:20
Andy joined
04:21
Theory joined
05:04
workbench joined
05:05
tetragon joined
05:22
apeiron joined
05:44
Bzek joined
05:58
Bzek_ joined
05:59
Ademan joined
06:10
cotto joined
06:19
uniejo joined
06:38
Bzek__ joined
06:39
Bzek___ joined
06:49
Zaba joined
|
|||
| dalek | r31486 | cotto++ | trunk: | 06:54 | |
| : [pipp] add macros, fix function definitions, implement more hash code, add POD | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=31486 | |||
|
06:54
cosimo joined
07:19
iblechbot joined
07:49
tetragon joined
07:57
isop joined
|
|||
| isop | pmichaud: ping | 08:12 | |
|
08:36
johbar joined
|
|||
| dalek | r31487 | kjs++ | trunk: | 09:18 | |
| : [pirc/new] fix several bugs | |||
| : + several instruction generation problems fixed | |||
| : + identified a new issue: lt i, j, L cannot be properly parsed; it expects "L" to be a valid identifier; but labels should be skipped. | |||
| : + several other minor updates. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=31487 | |||
| r31488 | rurban++ | pdd30_install: | 09:21 | ||
| : [pipp] Update to hash code: r31475, r31484, r31486 | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=31488 | |||
| r31489 | rurban++ | pdd30_install: | 09:25 | ||
| : [cage] Update to trunk, fix svn props of new files | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=31489 | |||
|
09:52
kj joined
09:53
kj joined
11:00
integral joined
|
|||
| dalek | r31490 | jkeenan++ | trunk: | 11:02 | |
| : Eliminate triling white space so that this file doesn't cause coding standards test to fail. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=31490 | |||
| r31491 | rurban++ | pdd30_install: | 11:26 | ||
| : [cage] Honor DYNPMC_ env vars for pipp hash | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=31491 | |||
|
11:37
dalek joined
12:36
Lorn joined
13:09
tetragon joined
13:13
donaldh joined
13:27
gryphon joined
13:28
donaldh joined
13:31
isop joined
|
|||
| isop | pmichaud: ping | 13:31 | |
|
13:34
PacoLinux joined
13:39
masak joined
13:57
cognominal joined
14:09
Andy joined
14:10
tomyan joined
14:19
tomyan joined
14:21
pyrimidine joined
14:22
TimToady joined
14:27
jhorwitz joined
14:40
iblechbot joined
14:49
coke joined
|
|||
| coke | ... use.perl.org keeps losing my journal posts. "preview" goes nowhere, and I lose the posting. | 14:50 | |
| Ontolog | hey I thought say($123) is suppose to work | ||
| i get error:imcc:The opcode 'say' (say<0>) was not found. Check the type and number of the arguments | 14:51 | ||
| moritz | in PIR? | 14:52 | |
| masak | in nqp? | 15:02 | |
| moritz: thanks for the tip about Match.pir, I found it independently a few moments ago :) | 15:03 | ||
| moritz | ah, but I was faster ;) | 15:04 | |
| masak | indeed you were :) | 15:05 | |
|
15:12
uniejo joined
|
|||
| Ontolog | in PIR | 15:21 | |
| sorry i remember now it was said that say works in NQP | |||
| my bad | |||
| moritz | print() works in pir | ||
| and $123 isn't a valid register, as far as I can tell | |||
| particle1 | what is $123? | 15:22 | |
| right | |||
| particle | i believe print works in nqp, too | 15:26 | |
| moritz | aye | ||
| dalek | r31492 | kjs++ | trunk: | 15:35 | |
| : [pirc/new] move a function declaration. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=31492 | |||
| r31493 | kjs++ | trunk: | 15:37 | ||
| : [pirc/new] fix function decl. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=31493 | |||
| particle | nqp: say("hi"); | 15:47 | |
| i thought nqp was missing from polyglotbot... | |||
| moritz | it works in #perl6 ;) | ||
| where p6eval rules | |||
|
15:50
donaldh_ joined,
Theory joined
16:00
pyrimidine joined,
Khisanth joined
16:25
NotFound joined
|
|||
| NotFound | Hi | 16:25 | |
| moritz | hi NotFound ;) | ||
| dalek | r31494 | pmichaud++ | trunk: | 16:40 | |
| : [rakudo]: spectest-progress.csv update: 188 files, 4121 passing tests | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=31494 | |||
|
16:49
Zaba_ joined
|
|||
| particle | moritz: what's the chance of getting to 4500 passing rakudo spec tests by 21 oct? 5000? | 16:56 | |
| moritz | particle: depends... | ||
| particle: I have very important exams on oct 10 and 15, and SWMBO has 30th birthday on 21, so I don't have much time ;) | 16:57 | ||
| particle | what's the least important way of getting there, then? | ||
| converting t/ to t/spec? writing new tests? | |||
| s/important/expensive/ | |||
| moritz | mostly moving (and reviewing) tests | ||
| particle | ok | 16:58 | |
| moritz | there are plenty of OO sane oo tests in t/oo/ | ||
| what's special about oct 21? | |||
| particle | my next parrot release | ||
| moritz | ah ;) | ||
| particle | :) | ||
| moritz | I completely re-wrote tools/update_passing_test_data.pl which was responsible for the last peak | 17:00 | |
| particle | does that work only on t/spec/? | ||
| moritz | yes | ||
| it gives a much better overview of which tests to consider for fudging | |||
| particle | i'm awaiting more memory so i can run more virtual machines | ||
| ok, so converting t/oo/ to t/spec/ would be a good priority | 17:01 | ||
| even moving them to t/spec/S12-misc/ would be a start, i suppose | |||
| or S12-unclassified? | |||
| moritz | t/{oo,blocks,regex} | 17:02 | |
|
17:02
Khisanth joined
|
|||
| moritz | one of the reasons for t/spec/ was to have a better structure than before | 17:02 | |
| particle | yep | ||
| moritz | so I oppose S12-unclassified | ||
| particle | well, it would be temporary | ||
| since rakudo only runs tests in t/spec | |||
| it would help me figure out which files to fudge/move first | 17:03 | ||
| moritz | then move them there locally | ||
| (or s/move/copy/) | |||
| I've seen too many temporary solutions become permanent | |||
| particle | sure, i don't want that to happen | ||
| but it'd be nice to parallelize | 17:04 | ||
| more hands... | |||
| can you think of a way that might work? | |||
| moritz | parallelize? | ||
| particle | have more people working on the conversion | ||
| rather than single people picking at items | |||
| moritz | the hard part is that they have to review the tests for correctness | ||
| that requires some non-trivial Perl 6 knowledge | 17:05 | ||
| apart from that it's quite easy | |||
| particle | yes, so i want to lower the barrier for new contributors | ||
| moritz | the lower barrier stuff is listed in t/TASKS | ||
| particle | specifically, i'll be giving a workshop in portland in early october, then at pittsburgh perl workshop in mid october | ||
| if i can give new contributors a way to be helpful, without having deep perl 6 knowledge | 17:06 | ||
| moritz | well, t/TASKS has some stuff for that | ||
| particle | like: here's how to see if a test in pugs's t/ dir parses in rakudo | ||
| moritz | ../../parrot perl6.pbc $path_to_test | 17:07 | |
| particle | actually, i'll probably use localtest.data and make localtest | ||
| moritz | localtest is limited to t/spec/ :( | 17:08 | |
| particle | urk. i thought you could specify absolute pathnames | ||
| moritz | no, t/spec/ is automatically prepended | ||
| particle | that stinks :( | 17:09 | |
| moritz | but you could change that, I guess | ||
|
17:09
davidfetter joined
|
|||
| particle finally has a win32 dev env set up again | 17:11 | ||
| msdn++ microsoft++ | |||
|
17:11
apeiron joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | (4500 tests) very likely. | 17:14 | |
| moritz | particle: I ran tools/update*.pl on t/, and it gives lot of passes for simple test files that test for one bug | ||
| pmichaud | my task for today/tomorrow is to get value and reference semantics working properly in Rakudo. That should also enable captures to work. | ||
| particle | oh, that'll be a big one! | 17:15 | |
| moritz | that hopefully enables a whole bunch of tests | ||
| pmichaud | oh, and list assignment. | ||
| particle | sheesh. | ||
| pmichaud++ | |||
| pmichaud | whether that gets us to 5000... I dunno. | 17:16 | |
| particle | where were we last release, ~3300? | ||
| pmichaud | yes. | ||
| 3370. | |||
| In the one or two instances where I walked people through tests -- after finding a test file I found they then wanted to start working on fixing the compiler so that it would pass the test. | 17:18 | ||
| Of course, that then involves a _lot_ more explanation and background. | 17:19 | ||
| particle | right | ||
| Tene | Man, class today is a nightmare. | ||
| particle | and writing rakudo in perl 6 is the quickest way there | ||
| pmichaud | particle: not completely. | ||
| nopaste | "moritz" at 89.13.222.241 pasted "passing tests in t/ (copied to t/spec/tmp)" (103 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/14191 | ||
| Tene | pmichaud: is there anywhere else you want to start using filters on the exception handlers? | ||
| particle | no, but it's easier than teaching pir | ||
| pmichaud | particle: sure, but there's an assumption there that we can write lots of things in Perl 6. So far I'm not seeing it. | 17:20 | |
| particle | tene: where are filters used now? | ||
| loops, blocks, routines? | |||
| pmichaud | Tene: the return filter is the only one that I've been doing thus far | ||
| particle | s/loops// | ||
| moritz | pmichaud: I think it's basically impossible to get signatures from PIR right (because of the named/positional overlap in Perl 6) | ||
| pmichaud | Tene: did you see my note about the weirdness with the next/redo/last patch? | 17:21 | |
| Tene | pmichaud: I did. | ||
| pmichaud | moritz: well, *that* part will definitely be perl 6, yes. But the inside guts of the functions will likely still need some PIR. | ||
| Tene | pmichaud: the return filter is already committed. Makes debugging generated pir much nicer when it throws exceptions. | ||
| particle | has Q:PIR been written yet? | 17:22 | |
| pmichaud | and the named/positional overlap is waiting a redesign of parrot's calling conventions, which I *think* is being handled as part of the mmd branch | ||
| (if it's not being handled as part of that branch, then that branch is a dependency.) | |||
| particle: (Q:PIR) not yet | |||
| particle | hopefully mmd branch gets merged before next parrot release | ||
| pmichaud | particle: but it requires a lot more than just Q:PIR, we also need "is export" and "is also" | ||
| particle | so i don't think the merge should be blocked by pcc | ||
| what's "is also" ? aliasing? ok. | 17:23 | ||
| moritz | particle: extending existing classes (is also) | ||
| pmichaud | in this case "is also" is reopening a class. | ||
| particle | ah | ||
| pmichaud | not hard, but I'll have to dissect jonathan's class code to make it work (or wait for him to come back from vaca) | ||
| particle | is that on jonathan's list? | ||
| that would put it post-pghpw | 17:24 | ||
| pmichaud | right, I _am_ working to get a lot of this pre-pghpw so we can use it there. | ||
|
17:24
Coke joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | (which also means I may not spend a whole lot of time on-channel, so I can focus w/o distractions) | 17:24 | |
| Tene++ # return filter | 17:25 | ||
| Tene: I'm a little concerned about why the other patch isn't working though. I'm wondering if we're hitting an imcc limit or something. | |||
| Tene | Yeah. It's creepy. | 17:26 | |
| Did you see my comments on the ticket itself? | 17:27 | ||
| pmichaud | yes. | ||
| Tene | Like I said. Creepy. | ||
| pmichaud | (prior to writing my message, at any rate) | ||
| pyrimidine | Re: PGE::Match, is there a way I can have .next return the next match starting from a specific position? | 17:32 | |
| Tene | IMCC is haunted, just ask c. | 17:33 | |
| pmichaud | pyrimidine: you probably don't want .next then | ||
| pyrimidine | I tried resetting .from prior to calling .next and I get an empty string instead | ||
| pmichaud | pyrimidine: you can re-call the regex and pass the 'continue' option to start at a given position | 17:34 | |
| particle runs 'nmake test' for the first time in his new env and crosses his fingers | |||
| pyrimidine | ok, I'll try that | ||
| particle | continue++ | 17:35 | |
| pmichaud: that can be used for :g, correct? | |||
| pmichaud | particle: yes, although I still need to decide if :g is part of the regex or part of the calling interface | ||
| (and I need to ask TimToady about that one -- will probably do so in next design meeting) | |||
|
17:36
Theory joined
|
|||
| particle | great, i'll try to remind you | 17:36 | |
| pmichaud | tnx, that would be helpful. | 17:37 | |
| pyrimidine | I was thinking about implementing :g for .subst, but I probably will hold off then | ||
| pmichaud | afk for a while | 17:41 | |
| Coke points to partcl.blogspot.com/ | 17:51 | ||
|
18:06
tewk joined
|
|||
| dalek | r31495 | julianalbo++ | trunk: | 18:28 | |
| : pirric: refactor numeric functions to avoid duplicate code, add LN and EXP functions | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=31495 | |||
|
19:12
d4l3k_ joined
19:14
jq- joined,
cosimo_ joined,
Coke_ joined
|
|||
| cotto | Is there a way to use regexes from c? | 19:17 | |
|
19:18
cognominal_ joined
19:19
AndyA joined
19:22
Ivatar joined
|
|||
| Tene | Aw, netsplit. :( | 19:33 | |
|
19:34
nopaste joined
|
|||
| Tene | I was going to harass Coke, too. | 19:35 | |
| pmichaud: you said you support provisional commit while waiting on CLA from dmknopp? | 19:36 | ||
|
19:46
davidfetter joined
19:55
Zaba joined
20:00
davidfetter joined
20:02
Tene joined
20:07
Zaba_ joined
20:21
mj41_ joined
|
|||
| dalek | r31496 | julianalbo++ | trunk: | 20:29 | |
| : pirric: add CHR$ and ASC functions and unary + and MOD operators, change operators precedences | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=31496 | |||
| r31497 | coke++ | trunk: | 20:35 | ||
| : [tcl] remove "will do" comment; we are. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=31497 | |||
|
20:42
Theory joined
|
|||
| dalek | r31498 | moritz++ | trunk: | 20:49 | |
| : [rakudo] add regex tests (stdrules.t) to spectest_regression | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=31498 | |||
|
20:53
Ademan joined
|
|||
| dalek | r31499 | moritz++ | trunk: | 20:59 | |
| : [t/spec] two more tests for spectest_regression | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=31499 | |||
| r31500 | cotto++ | trunk: | 21:07 | ||
| : [pipp] implement string->int conversion and put for Pipp hashes | |||
| : other small fixes and improvements too | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=31500 | |||
| Tene | oracle-- | 21:22 | |
|
21:24
Lorn joined
|
|||
| dalek | r31501 | moritz++ | trunk: | 21:28 | |
| : [rakudo] two more tests for spectest_regression | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=31501 | |||
| r31502 | moritz++ | trunk: | 21:39 | ||
| : [rakudo] one more regex test file for spectest_regression | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=31502 | |||
|
22:04
Theory joined
22:11
idemal joined
22:25
apeiron joined
22:52
Andy left
22:56
TiMBuS joined
23:06
tetragon joined
|
|||
| Tene | Anybody here near Denver, CO? | 23:09 | |
| s1n | cotto: in case you didn't get an answer, regexes in C can be used via regex.h (check the manpage for more deets) | 23:54 | |
| NotFound | s1n: for some values of 'C' | ||
| s1n | what? | 23:57 | |
| NotFound | Is posix, not a standard C header | 23:58 | |
| s1n | the definition of "standard C header" depends on what is available in your copy of libc | 23:59 | |