|
parrot.org/ - clean up those smolders for the release! Set by moderator on 20 October 2008. |
|||
|
00:07
pmichaud joined
00:08
leo joined
00:09
AndyA joined
00:11
polyglotbot joined
00:12
pmichaud joined
00:14
leo joined
00:15
dalek joined
|
|||
| dalek | r32413 | cotto++ | trunk: | 00:16 | |
| : [pipp] tighten tag parsing, add echo tags | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32413 | |||
| r32414 | pmichaud++ | trunk: | |||
| : [rakudo]: Partial spectest-progress.csv update -- more later. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32414 | |||
|
00:17
jonathan joined
|
|||
| jonathan | feather sure seems to have a few issues... | 00:22 | |
| jonathan sleeps | 00:53 | ||
|
01:00
polyglotbot joined
|
|||
| Tene | rakudo: say 'omg' | 01:00 | |
| polyglotbot | OUTPUT[omg] | ||
| Tene | lolcode: VISIBLE "omg polyglotbot works again" | 01:01 | |
| polyglotbot | OUTPUT[omg polyglotbot works again] | ||
| cotto | pipp: <?="ohai!"?> | 01:02 | |
| polyglotbot | OUTPUT[ohai!] | ||
| Tene | tcl: [doesn't work anymore] | 01:03 | |
| polyglotbot | OUTPUT[Parrot VM: Can't stat languages/tcl/tcl.pbc, code 2.main: Packfile loading failed] | ||
| cotto | pipp: <?="also"?> <?="doesn't"?> <?="work"?> | 01:07 | |
| polyglotbot | OUTPUT[also ="doesn't"?> work] | ||
|
01:24
Whiteknight joined
01:43
petdance joined
01:57
Limbic_Region joined
|
|||
| bacek_ | summon pmichaud :) | 02:05 | |
| Tene++ # ressurecting polyglotbot | 02:09 | ||
| chromatic | Tcl probably needs 'make realclean'. | 02:10 | |
| Coke invalidated the bytecode today, removing some deprecated ops. | |||
|
02:28
bacek joined
|
|||
| bacek_ | karma | 02:37 | |
| karma bacek | |||
| purl | bacek has karma of 70 | ||
| bacek_ | little bit more. | ||
| cotto | pipp:<?="bacek"?>++ | 02:41 | |
| |! | 02:42 | ||
| bacek_ | cotto: cheating! :) | 02:43 | |
| cotto | I figure it's not cheating if I use a recently-implemented feature. | 02:44 | |
| I don't mind cheating anyway. ;) | |||
| Tene | pipp: <?="bacek"?>++ | 02:53 | |
| polyglotbot | OUTPUT[bacek++] | ||
| Tene | need the space | 02:54 | |
| bacek_ | karma bacek | 02:55 | |
| purl | bacek has karma of 70 | ||
| cotto | karma <?="bacek"?> | ||
| purl | <?="bacek"?> has karma of 1 | ||
| cotto | lucky guy | ||
| bacek_ | heh, cheating doesn't work as expected ;) | ||
| cotto | pipp:<?=" bacek"?>++ | 02:56 | |
| pipp: <?=" bacek"?>++ | |||
| polyglotbot | OUTPUT[ bacek++] | ||
| cotto | karma backe | ||
| purl | backe has neutral karma | ||
| cotto | karma bacek | ||
| purl | bacek has karma of 71 | ||
|
03:12
Ademan joined
03:17
Psyche^ joined
04:06
MariachiElf joined
|
|||
| bacek_ | is Object inherited from Any in rakudo? | 04:14 | |
| pmichaud | Any is inherited from Object. | 04:18 | |
| bacek_ | pmichaud: thanks | ||
| pmichaud | rakudo: say Any ~~ Object; | 04:19 | |
| polyglotbot | OUTPUT[1] | ||
| pmichaud | rakudo: say Object ~~ Any; | ||
| polyglotbot | OUTPUT[1] | ||
| pmichaud | hmm. | ||
| bacek_ | rakudo: say Num ~~ Object | ||
| polyglotbot | OUTPUT[1] | ||
| bacek_ | rakudo: say Num ~~ Any | ||
| polyglotbot | OUTPUT[1] | ||
| bacek_ | hmm... | ||
| rakudo: say Num ~~ Int | |||
| polyglotbot | OUTPUT[0] | ||
| bacek_ | rakudo: say Int ~~ Num | ||
| polyglotbot | OUTPUT[0] | ||
| bacek_ | rakudo: class Foo {}; say Foo ~~ Object | 04:20 | |
| polyglotbot | OUTPUT[1] | ||
| bacek_ | rakudo: class Foo {}; say Foo ~~ Any | ||
| polyglotbot | OUTPUT[1] | ||
| bacek_ | pmichaud: looks like I can't reimplement 'succ'/'pred' using MMD | ||
| pmichaud | ....why not? | 04:21 | |
| bacek_ | I thinks about adding 'prefix:++ multi(Object)' and 'prefix:++ multi(_)' | 04:22 | |
| so, first version will call 'succ', scond 'inc arg' | 04:23 | ||
| pmichaud | just make a single prefix:++ that calls inc. | ||
| (like it was before) | 04:24 | ||
| then we'll create a vtable function in Object that calls succ | |||
| bacek_ | Ah, ok. | ||
| btw, I reimplemented junctions collapsion in boolean context. It's short-circuit now. | 04:26 | ||
| hmm... Looks like my mail didn't reach list (yet) | |||
| pmichaud: S03's succ/pred is suboptimal... We always have to create new object and copy it over old one for 'prefix:++'... | 04:38 | ||
| pmichaud | that's not a big deal in this case, though. | 04:39 | |
| mostly we'll be incrementing/decrementing Ints, which won't go through succ/pred | |||
| bacek_ | yes of cause. Just... Suboptimel :) | ||
| Suboptimal | |||
| purl | Suboptimal is a nice way of saying "Rather Fucked Up (tm)" | ||
| bacek_ | postfix versions will be just awful... $P0 = clone a; inc a; 4 clones for single increment. | 04:41 | |
| pmichaud | 4 clones? | 04:42 | |
| bacek_ | 'clone a'. Then in 'succ' we have to "clone" object with previous value. | 04:43 | |
| pmichaud | there's always the possibility of writing custom VTABLE_increment or postfix:<++> if it's an issue. | ||
| bacek_ | at least 2 :) | ||
| pmichaud | ....why do we have to clone an object in 'succ'? | ||
| bacek_ | and S03-operators/autoincrement treats 'succ' as in-place change. | 04:44 | |
| pmichaud | succ isn't an inplace change | ||
| bacek_ | We have to create copy of object with "next" value | ||
| pmichaud | anyway, I count 3 clones. | ||
| we know there has to be at least one. | 04:45 | ||
| bacek_ | ++$var | ||
| --$var | |||
| are equivalent to | |||
| $var.=succ | |||
| $var.=pred | |||
| pmichaud | note that .succ isn't an inplace method there -- it's being called via the inplace operator | ||
| .succ simply returns the next value -- it doesn't modify the invocant. | 04:46 | ||
| $var .= succ is the same as $var = $var.succ | |||
| at any rate, I'm not in charge of the spec. :-) | |||
| bacek_ | can we change it? :) | 04:47 | |
| pmichaud | you can ask on perl6-language about it. | ||
| but I can say that since doing increment/decrement on anything other than Ints is fairly rare, it doesn't seem worth the effort (and loss of potential flexibility) to try to optimize it further. | 04:48 | ||
| bacek_ | fair enough | ||
| pmichaud | and we do still make it possible for people to write custom operators that avoid it if necessary | ||
| bacek_ | Method 'succ' not found for invocant of class 'Int' | 04:51 | |
| Yak. Auto-boxing | |||
| pmichaud | make sure to use :vtable('increment') and not 'increment' :vtable | 04:53 | |
| otherwise the vtable function will get installed in the subclasses. | |||
| bacek_ | .sub '' :method :vtable('increment') | 04:54 | |
| ? | |||
| pmichaud | yes. | ||
| bacek_ | it works! | ||
| S03-operators/autoincrement.t still passed | 04:55 | ||
| nopaste? | 04:56 | ||
| clunker3 | pasta.test-smoke.org/ or paste.husk.org/ or nopaste.snit.ch:8001/ or rafb.net/paste or poundperl.pastebin.com/ or paste.scsys.co.uk/ | ||
| purl | nopaste is probably at nopaste.snit.ch/ (ask TonyC for new channels) or rafb.net/paste or poundperl.pastebin.com/ or paste.scsys.co.uk/ or App::Nopaste or tools/dev/nopaste.pl or at www.extpaste.com/ | ||
| nopaste | "bacek" at 211.29.157.151 pasted "succ/pred reimplementation for pmichaud to review" (88 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/14502 | 04:57 | |
| pmichaud | I'm busy with containers at the moment -- can you attach it to the rt ticket for me to look at a bit later? | ||
| bacek_ | yes, of cause | 05:00 | |
| afk #meeting... | |||
|
05:01
magnachef__ joined
|
|||
| dalek | r32415 | pmichaud++ | rakon: | 05:14 | |
| : [rakudo]: Remove rounders.t from spectest.data (needs non-cheating version) | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32415 | |||
|
05:47
magnachef joined
|
|||
| Coke | tcl doesn't work in polygotbot because tcl isn't in core. | 05:53 | |
|
05:53
magnachef__ joined
|
|||
| Tene | Yeah, I know. I was just :(in about it. | 05:56 | |
| Coke was telling chromatic. | 05:57 | ||
| Tene | ah | 06:00 | |
| Right. There are more people on IRC than just myself. | |||
| I remember now. | 06:01 | ||
| dalek | r32416 | pmichaud++ | rakon: | 06:40 | |
| : [rakudo]: Make sure that "$a" and "{3}" return Str. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32416 | |||
| cotto | seen barney | 06:50 | |
| purl | barney was last seen on #parrot 13 hours, 23 minutes and 9 seconds ago, saying: k | ||
| nopaste | "moritz" at 89.13.220.217 pasted "Test failure in t/pmc/pmc.t" (9 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/14503 | 07:13 | |
| chromatic | Looks like fallout of removing type ids. | 07:18 | |
| It passes for me though. | 07:22 | ||
| Did you reconfigure? | |||
| moritz | yes | 07:23 | |
| realclean + configure | |||
| (before the reconfigure rakudo wouldn't even build) | |||
| chromatic | Strange. | 07:24 | |
| purl | But true. | ||
| szabgab | hi ppl, is the code of dalek and purl available somewhere? | ||
| moritz | I think purl is an Infobot, which is on cpan | 07:25 | |
| chromatic | moritz, it's t/pmc/pmc_3.pasm, I think. | 07:26 | |
| The culprit anyway. | |||
| szabgab looking at infobot on CPAN | |||
| moritz | $ ./parrot t/pmc/pmc_3.pasm | 07:29 | |
| All names ok. | |||
| Segmentation fault | |||
| purl | (Core dumped) | ||
| moritz | chromatic: do you want a bt? | ||
| chromatic | Yes please. | 07:30 | |
| moritz | nopaste.snit.ch/14504 | ||
| chromatic | interp->scheduler is invalid, right? | 07:31 | |
| moritz | how do I check? | ||
| chromatic | p interp->scheduler | ||
| moritz | (my gdb-fu is nearly 0 ;) | ||
| $1 = (PMC *) 0x833ec34 | |||
| chromatic | p interp->scheduler->vtable->delete_keyed_int | 07:32 | |
| moritz | Cannot access memory at address 0xdeadbfcb | 07:33 | |
| chromatic | p interp->scheduler->vtable | ||
| 0xdeadbeef, I imagine | |||
| moritz | yes | ||
| chromatic | Here's the problem. | ||
| During finalization before full exit, Parrot sweeps all PMC pools and destroys everything still alive. | |||
| It's already destroyed the scheduler PMC before it destroys the Timer PMC. | 07:34 | ||
| The Timer PMC's destructor wants to unschedule the timer task. | |||
| Boom. | |||
| moritz | sounds like it's not the first time you encountered something like that ;) | 07:35 | |
| chromatic | It's not. We have an order of destruction problem. | 07:36 | |
| dalek | r32417 | pmichaud++ | trunk: | ||
| : [rakudo]: partial spectest-progress.csv update | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32417 | |||
| chromatic | There's no really good solution, other than building a dependency graph of object relationships. | 07:42 | |
|
07:46
uniejo joined
|
|||
| dalek | r32418 | chromatic++ | trunk: | 08:00 | |
| : [ops] Removed experimental new_i_s opcode, which was deprecated anyway, as it | |||
| : used type IDs (and getting it to work with string names is more trouble than | |||
| : it's worth for a deprecated, experimental op anyway). Only the FIA tests | |||
| : relied on it. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32418 | |||
| r32419 | chromatic++ | trunk: | 08:08 | ||
| : [PIR] Revised PIR language so that .const directive takes the string name of a | |||
| : PMC type instead of the integer ID. This changed several libraries and tests, | |||
| : but all tests pass for me now. See RT #48024. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32419 | |||
|
08:22
elmex joined
|
|||
| elmex | Zaba: hi | 08:22 | |
|
09:00
cosimo joined
09:33
Ademan joined
10:00
kj joined
10:06
wolverian joined
10:13
cout joined
10:52
TonyC joined
10:54
nopaste joined
11:09
nopaste joined,
barney joined
11:13
TonyC joined
|
|||
| bacek | hi all | 11:20 | |
| hello purl | |||
| cotto | barney, I've started hacking on Pipp's grammar and actions. svn up early and often, and let me know if there are any parts of the code I should avoid. | ||
| also, the "sea" is anything outside PHP tags, not just HTML. | 11:22 | ||
| I'm trying to make that part of the grammar dtrt, but I wouldn't be disappointed if you managed to fix it first. | 11:23 | ||
| I need sleeps. I'll see if you respond, but I'm out. | 11:25 | ||
| night | |||
|
11:31
iblechbot joined
|
|||
| barney | cotto++ | 11:31 | |
|
11:32
TonyC joined
|
|||
| barney | WRT behavior of 'sea', a (TODO) test case would be nice | 11:33 | |
|
11:49
gaz joined
|
|||
| dalek | r32420 | bernhard++ | trunk: | 12:24 | |
| : Pipp: Use token <ws_char> for defining the token <ws>. | |||
| : Do not capture <ws_char>. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32420 | |||
| barney | Is there an example for a <ws> rule that requires whitespace within an identifier? | 12:25 | |
| Like the default <ws> rule does? | |||
|
12:26
gaz joined
|
|||
| moritz | <after \\w> \\s+ <before \\w> # something like this? | 12:28 | |
| bacek | moritz: you promised to review t/junction tests :) | 12:33 | |
| moritz | bacek: I promised to do it in 6 hours or later, and it became later ;( | 12:34 | |
| bacek | no worries! | 12:35 | |
| I can accept applying patch from #60390 as regrets :) | 12:36 | ||
| dalek | r32421 | bernhard++ | trunk: | 12:37 | |
| : Pipp: explicitly require whitespace after 'echo' | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32421 | |||
| moritz | I don't have a working copy here (I'm at $work right now), so patch monkeying ;( | 12:39 | |
| barney | moritz: the rule " 'echo' '_count' " should match 'echo count' but not 'echo_count' | ||
| bacek | moritz: fair enough | 12:40 | |
| barney | PHP has function calls without parentheses | ||
| moritz | barney: did you mean 'echo _count'? | 12:41 | |
| rakudo: rule w { <after \\w> \\s+ <before \\w> :: | \\s* }: "echo_count" ~~ m/\\w+ <w> \\w+/; say $/ | 12:44 | ||
| polyglotbot | OUTPUT[Statement not terminated properly at line 1, near ": \\"echo_co"current instr.: 'parrot;PGE;Util;die' pc 129 (runtime/parrot/library/PGE/Util.pir:83)called from Sub 'parrot;Perl6;Grammar;eat_terminator' pc 26705 (src/gen_grammar.pir:3187)called from Sub | ||
| ..'parrot;Perl6;Grammar;statementlist' pc 25361 (src/gen_grammar.pir:2654)called fro... | |||
| barney | The problem is that I have a function called 'echo_count', so the rule 'echo' <arguments> should not match first | ||
| moritz | rakudo: rule w { <after \\w> \\s+ <before \\w> : | \\s* }: "echo_count" ~~ m/\\w+ <w> \\w+/; say $/ | ||
| polyglotbot | OUTPUT[Statement not terminated properly at line 1, near ": \\"echo_co"current instr.: 'parrot;PGE;Util;die' pc 129 (runtime/parrot/library/PGE/Util.pir:83)called from Sub 'parrot;Perl6;Grammar;eat_terminator' pc 26705 (src/gen_grammar.pir:3187)called from Sub | ||
| ..'parrot;Perl6;Grammar;statementlist' pc 25361 (src/gen_grammar.pir:2654)called fro... | |||
| moritz | barney: then you need a word boundary assertion, I think | 12:45 | |
| bacek | moritz: AFAIU barney needs LTM... | 12:46 | |
| moritz | rakduo: if "echo_count" ~~ m/echo>>/ { say "yes" } else { say "no" } | ||
| rakudo: if "echo_count" ~~ m/echo>>/ { say "yes" } else { say "no" } | |||
| polyglotbot | OUTPUT[no] | ||
| moritz | rakudo: if "echo _count" ~~ m/echo>>/ { say "yes" } else { say "no" } | ||
| polyglotbot | OUTPUT[yes] | ||
| barney | What does the >> mean? | 12:47 | |
| moritz | right word boundary | ||
| rakudo: if "echo _count" ~~ m/echo\\b/ { say "yes" } else { say "no" } | |||
| polyglotbot | OUTPUT[yes] | ||
| moritz | rakudo: if "echo_count" ~~ m/echo\\b/ { say "yes" } else { say "no" } | ||
| polyglotbot | OUTPUT[no] | ||
| moritz | barney: maybe \\b as a general word boundary is more readable for the average Perl 5 hacker ;) | 12:48 | |
| but in general a nice ws rule leads to a more readable grammar | 12:50 | ||
| and I don't understand rakudo's ws rule :( | 12:51 | ||
| barney | neither do I | 12:52 | |
| Can I use the builtin <ws> rule and just add the language specific comment rules ? | 12:53 | ||
| moritz | maybe cardinal's ws rule is more understandable | 12:55 | |
| not really, it seems | |||
| barney | As my current workaround works I'll leave that for now. | 12:57 | |
| First I need to support parameter passing for user defined functions, so that I can continue with a testing lib written in PHP | 12:59 | ||
|
13:01
petdance joined
|
|||
| bacek | is RT very slow today??? | 13:19 | |
| I can't merge 2 tickets. It returns empty page... | 13:20 | ||
| And my mail from 10+ hours still doesn't reach ticket... | 13:21 | ||
| moritz: any particular bugs for rambling ex-developer? | 13:29 | ||
| Infinoid | RT seems to load ticket pages fine, here | ||
|
13:30
purl joined
|
|||
| moritz | bacek: no, I lost contact with the RT queue some weeks ago :( | 13:30 | |
| bacek | moritz: how that? | ||
| moritz | bacek: no time to follow it | 13:32 | |
| dalek | r32422 | bernhard++ | trunk: | 13:34 | |
| : Pipp: set 'arity' for function definitions | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32422 | |||
|
13:36
masak joined,
kjinlabs joined
|
|||
| barney | Is there a channel for twin city workshop ? | 13:49 | |
| pmichaud | (ws rule) PCT provides a <ww> rule that matches between two word characters | 14:01 | |
| thus one can use <!ww> to say "must mot match between two word characters" | |||
| so a sample ws rule can be token ws { <!ww> \\s+ | \\s* } | 14:02 | ||
| er, I have that backwards | |||
| token ws { <!ww> \\s* | \\s+ } | |||
| which means "if we're not between two word characters, then zero spaces is okay, otherwise we need at least one space" | 14:03 | ||
| barney | pmichaud: tnx, i'll try that | 14:13 | |
| bacek | pmichaud: good morning :) | 14:16 | |
| pmichaud | good morning :-) | 14:17 | |
| bacek failed closing tickets in RT... | 14:21 | ||
| dalek | r32423 | bernhard++ | trunk: | 14:27 | |
| : Pipp: Refactor the <ws> rule using <!ww> | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32423 | |||
| particle | hi-o | 14:28 | |
| pmichaud | hello, particle | ||
| bacek | pmichaud: Bool.succ/pred update data in-place. | ||
| pmichaud | bacek: ? | 14:29 | |
| bacek | looks like a bug | ||
| src/classes/Bool.pir +47 | |||
|
14:29
Aisling joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | yes, looks like a bug. We can either remove the succ/pred name from the method, or redefine those to not be vtable and return the correct value. | 14:30 | |
| I think I prefer the latter at the moment. | |||
| bacek | +1 for latter | 14:31 | |
| and applying #60390 :) | |||
| pmichaud | +.sub '' :method :vtable('increment') | 14:33 | |
| + self = self.'succ'() | |||
| + .return(self) | |||
| +.end | |||
| ... that can't be correct. | |||
| self is a PMC register. | 14:34 | ||
| are there any tests for succ/pred ? | 14:35 | ||
| bacek | pmichaud: S03-operators/autoincrement.t | ||
| they passed | |||
| but they looks suspicious for me | 14:36 | ||
| pmichaud | ah, because the test is wrong. | ||
| bacek | (last 2) | ||
| pmichaud | the succ method is doing an inplace update. | ||
| $.value += 42; | 14:37 | ||
| should be | |||
| $.value + 42 | |||
| bacek | indeed. | 14:38 | |
|
14:44
gryphon joined
|
|||
| bacek | pmichaud: actually no... | 14:49 | |
| it should be Incrementer.new($.value +42) | |||
| Incrementor.new( value => $.value + 42); | 14:50 | ||
| Or Incrementor have to have constructor from Int. | 14:51 | ||
|
15:03
jhorwitz joined
15:18
cosimo joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | bacek: oh, yes -- that's a different bug. | 15:25 | |
| there's a couple of bugs there :-) | |||
| bacek | pmichaud: indeed :) I can't attach new version of patch. RT is broken... | 15:27 | |
| Or my firefox broken... | 15:33 | ||
| dalek | r32424 | fperrad++ | trunk: | 15:34 | |
| : [Lua] | |||
| : - fix testts, new syntax .const 'Name' | 15:35 | ||
| : (see r32419) | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32424 | |||
|
15:42
cosimo joined
|
|||
| dalek | r32425 | pmichaud++ | trunk: | 16:03 | |
| : [rakudo]: spectest-progress.csv update: 211 files, 4413 passing | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32425 | |||
| r32426 | fperrad++ | trunk: | 16:05 | ||
| : [Lua] | |||
| : - fix compilers & libs, new syntax .const 'Name' | |||
| : (see r32419) | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32426 | |||
|
16:05
magnachef joined,
rurban joined
|
|||
| barney | Can I use globals in an actions.pm file? Set a flag that I'm in a function body, so that I can set the scope accordingly. | 16:07 | |
|
16:09
hercynium joined
|
|||
| particle | you can drop into pir and do whatever you want | 16:11 | |
| PIR< $P0 = get_global '$foo' >; | 16:12 | ||
| barney | I tried using 'our' vars, but they were always undefined, even when they should have been initialised in previous method calls | 16:16 | |
| particle | rakudo definitely uses our variables to good effect | 16:17 | |
| our @?BLOCKS etc | |||
| @?BLOCK | 16:18 | ||
| have you taken a look at how rakudo does it? | 16:19 | ||
| barney | Yes, I've seen that. | ||
| particle | did you note that in perl6.pir, we have: | ||
| ## create a list for holding the stack of nested blocks | |||
| $P0 = new 'List' | |||
| set_hll_global ['Perl6';'Grammar';'Actions'], '@?BLOCK', $P0 | |||
| perhaps you're missing that? | 16:20 | ||
| barney | I was wondering why there wasn't a set_hll_global ['Perl6';'Grammar';'Actions'], '$?INIT', $P0 | 16:21 | |
| particle | i'm wondering that, too. need to ask jonathan | ||
| barney | But I try using an array for flagging. | ||
| pmichaud | since NQP only supports binding, there's generally not a need to do specialized initializations for scalar vars. | 16:26 | |
| particle | even though $?INIT is really an array? | ||
| pmichaud | it is? | ||
| purl | Oh no it isn't! | ||
| pmichaud | then why isn't it @?INIT ? | ||
| particle | $?INIT.push(...) | 16:27 | |
| great question. | |||
| pmichaud | oh | ||
| $?INIT isn't an array, it's a PAST::Block | |||
| particle | ah | ||
| pmichaud | you're not pushing onto an "INIT" array, you're adding to the Block that is the INIT block. | ||
| or something like that. | |||
| particle | heh, okay. | ||
| pmichaud | $?INIT seems like the wrong name for it, at any rate. | 16:28 | |
| okay, let's see if I can close out the rakon branch. | |||
| dalek | r32427 | fperrad++ | trunk: | ||
| : [WMLScript] | |||
| : - fix, new syntax .const 'Name' | |||
| : (see r32419) | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32427 | |||
| particle | what needs doing to make that happen? fix tests&bugs? | ||
| pmichaud | yes. | 16:29 | |
| I have a few other refactors I want to look at. | 16:30 | ||
| particle | are they rakon-specific refactors? | ||
| pmichaud | yes. | ||
| particle | k | ||
| pmichaud: i'm running spectests now, i'd like to help | 16:34 | ||
| pmichaud | sure thing -- there's stuff you can help with. knowing how your spectests come out would be a good thing -- I get some segfaults in mine. | 16:35 | |
| particle | i'm a little busy with other work, but i'll see what i can do | ||
| ok | |||
| i ran spectest last night and have the results handy | |||
| this morning, actions.pm is different, so i'm rerunning now | |||
| pmichaud | yes, I ran across a few bugs. :-) | 16:36 | |
| spectests++ # catching bugs | |||
| particle | i'm getting some bonus tests | 16:37 | |
| string-interpolation, boolean-context | |||
| pmichaud | yes, those are the ones we're aiming at by the fixing | ||
| we can't untodo those until we merge back to trunk, though. | |||
| particle | that's what i expected. ok | ||
| assign-is-not-binding | |||
| these are all good wins | 16:38 | ||
| it may be another 10m before i have results | |||
| rakudo is really slow on windows these days | |||
| pmichaud | it's slowing down a bit here, too. | ||
| or it may just be the standard "everything seems slower over time" perception. | 16:39 | ||
| particle | it takes way more than 10m to run spectest now | ||
| pmichaud | oh, that's quite a bit slower then. | ||
| I was noticing that on my machine as well, though. Maybe some Parrot change slowed things down. | 16:40 | ||
| yesterday I discovered that I can no longer run the rx.t spectest with -G, because I run out of memory. | |||
| actually, that probably tells me the day on which "whatever change" occurred. | 16:41 | ||
| just a sec | |||
| pmichaud starts a bisection | 16:43 | ||
|
16:44
Theory joined
|
|||
| particle | :) | 16:46 | |
| dalek | r32428 | pmichaud++ | trunk: | 16:47 | |
| : [rakudo]: Remove -G flag from test_summary.pl, | |||
| : as it results in "out of memory" errors on my machine | |||
| : for the S05-mass/rx.t tests. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32428 | |||
|
16:47
Theory joined
|
|||
| particle | pmichaud: short spectest failure results follow: | 16:55 | |
| t\\spec\\S03-operators\\context.rakudo 35 5 20-24 | |||
| t\\spec\\S12-class\\declaration-order.t 5 1280 2 0 ?? | |||
| t\\spec\\S16-filehandles\\io_in_while_loops. 13 2 13-14 | |||
| rakudo: say ~(item 3, 2).WHAT | 16:58 | ||
| polyglotbot | OUTPUT[Array] | ||
| particle | > say ~(item 3, 2).WHAT; | ||
| List | |||
| which is correct? | |||
| pmichaud | I think it should be List. | 17:00 | |
| particle | ok, then the test is wrong | ||
| S03-operators/context.t:54 | |||
| rakudo: ~(item 2).WHAT | |||
| polyglotbot | RESULT["Int"] | 17:01 | |
| particle | rakudo: ~2.WHAT | ||
| polyglotbot | RESULT["Int"] | ||
| particle | rakudo: ~($ 2).WHAT | ||
| polyglotbot | RESULT["Int"] | ||
| pmichaud | (re-reading spec), oh, perhaps it should be Array | 17:03 | |
| I'm not sure. | |||
| particle | yep, spec says item contextualizer creates an Array from a list | 17:04 | |
| pmichaud | where do you see that? | ||
| particle | L<S03/"The item contextualizer"> | 17:05 | |
| line 1920 or so | |||
| dalek | r32429 | bernhard++ | trunk: | 17:08 | |
| : Pipp: Try to use lexical scope for variables used within a function. | |||
| : But do not succeed. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32429 | |||
| pmichaud | the declaration-order.t is an odd segfault -- iirc it's even occurring in trunk. | 17:09 | |
| I haven't looked at io_in_while_loops yet | 17:10 | ||
| r32340 fixes context.t | |||
| particle | yes, that's from a change jonathan made before the branch | 17:11 | |
| dalek | r32430 | pmichaud++ | rakon: | ||
| : [rakudo]: item contextualizer on a list returns an Array | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32430 | |||
| particle | it was segfaulting only on windows, until i refactored actions.pm with .isa | ||
| i try to spread segfaults equally among platforms | |||
| hey, you stole my commit! :P | 17:12 | ||
|
17:12
gryphon joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | jonathan++ does it to me all the time. :-) | 17:16 | |
| particle | ok, in_in_while_loops could be off-by-one | ||
| need better diagnostics in that test | |||
| eew, io is all screwy | 17:18 | ||
| pmichaud | yes, io is screwy. | ||
| I'm willing to regress on that particular test for the time being until we get IO cleaned up. | |||
| particle | something is very wrong there | ||
| i think masak won't be happy with that | |||
| pmichaud | he needs that particular feature? | 17:19 | |
| particle | looks like my $line = =$fh is binding | ||
| seems every time i access $line, it runs =$fh | |||
| add 'diag($line)' to io_in_while_loops.t line 29 (just before is(...)) | 17:20 | ||
| you get 1\\n3\\n5\\n | |||
| if you remove is(...) you get 1\\n2\\n3\\n4\\n5\\n6\\n | |||
| pmichaud | okay, I think I see where this is going. | 17:23 | |
| fixed in r32431. | 17:25 | ||
| dalek | r32431 | pmichaud++ | rakon: | 17:26 | |
| : [rakudo]: Add '!VALUE' method to IOIterator . | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32431 | |||
| pmichaud | ...and now a lot of things make a ton of sense to me. | ||
| particle: can you test if that gets rid of all of our failing tests in the branch? I need to get some lunch here | 17:27 | ||
| if so, then I'll do my other refactors and code cleanups and merge to trunk. | |||
| message jonathan if you could get a simple 'is also' implemented (defining methods only, no need to worry about existing instances) then I think we could start writing a Prelude-in-Perl-6 module. | 17:29 | ||
| purl | Message for jonathan stored. | ||
| pmichaud | afk (lunch) | 17:33 | |
|
17:39
PerlJam joined
|
|||
| cognominal | is also? | 17:44 | |
| particle is running spectest now | 17:54 | ||
|
17:54
jan joined
|
|||
| particle | cognominal: 'is also' allows you to add behaviors to classes | 17:57 | |
| class Foo {...}; class Foo is also { method bar () {...} }; #adds method bar to class Foo | 17:58 | ||
| cognominal | something like some fature (forgot the name) of objc 2.0 | ||
| ? | |||
| particle | it's a feature of 'open' classes vs 'closed' classes | ||
| perl 6 classes are open by default, but you have to be explicit that you're changing the class's behavior | 17:59 | ||
| i'm not familiar with objc | |||
| looks like objc calls it 'categories' | 18:01 | ||
| A category allows you to add methods to an existing class—even to one to which you do not have the source. | |||
| cognominal | yes, categories | ||
| purl | rumour has it categories is easy | ||
| cognominal | forget categories | 18:02 | |
| purl | cognominal: I forgot categories | ||
| Patterner | purl: interfaces? | 18:04 | |
| purl | somebody said interfaces was a keyboard/chair at www.teos-inc.com/wpfloat.htm | ||
| particle | it seems 'is open' in perl 6 is just like objc categories, in that you can't add attributes, only methods | ||
| Patterner | purl: forget interfaces | ||
| purl | Patterner: I forgot interfaces | ||
| particle | however, perl 6 also has 'is instead' which lets you totally redefine the class. i don't think objc lets you do that | ||
| cognominal | I am getting interesting in objc because it is used on Macs, on the iPhone and by Cappucino a powerful web app framework. | 18:06 | |
| Cappuccino is client side because the code is compiled to javascript. | 18:07 | ||
| Cappuccino? | |||
| purl | Cappuccino is probably cocoa for the web, cappuccino.org/ you write my client code in Objective-J that is prepocessed in javascript, it steals from ruby on rails toom because it has a tool similar to capistrano | ||
| dalek | r32432 | fperrad++ | trunk: | 18:25 | |
| : [m4] | |||
| : - fix, new syntax .const 'Name' | |||
| : (see r32419) | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32432 | |||
| r32433 | fperrad++ | trunk: | 18:28 | ||
| : [lisp] | |||
| : - fix, new syntax .const 'Name' | |||
| : (see r32419) | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32433 | |||
|
18:32
magnachef joined
|
|||
| masak | pmichaud, particle: thank you for thinking of me before regressing something :) no, I don't think we use =$fh in November. go ahead an regress it if you like. | 18:42 | |
| masak is implementing .fmt tonight | |||
| particle | good to hear, masak, but pmichaud++ fixed it :) | ||
| masak | particle: that's ok too :) | ||
| particle | now i have a test failure in the harness, but not outside :( | 18:43 | |
| masak | particle: that happens sometimes, I hear | ||
| it's the Harness Specialization of the Observer Paradox. | |||
| particle | i'm quite familiar with that paradox ;) | 18:44 | |
| masak | :P | 18:46 | |
| PerlJam | if parrot had a documentation subsystem, paradox would be a good name for it | 18:55 | |
| masak | ooh | 18:56 | |
|
18:56
mberends joined
|
|||
| masak likes | 18:56 | ||
| dalek | r32434 | fperrad++ | trunk: | 19:10 | |
| : [regex] | |||
| : - fix, new syntax .const 'Name' | |||
| : (see r32419) | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32434 | |||
|
19:12
chromatic joined
|
|||
| jhorwitz | particle: gonna call the hotel -- we good for our rates? | 19:18 | |
| pmichaud | yes, I need to book my hotel also. | ||
| chromatic | Me too. | 19:20 | |
|
19:21
hercynium joined
|
|||
| dalek | r32435 | fperrad++ | trunk: | 19:37 | |
| : [dotnet] | |||
| : - fix, new syntax .const 'Name' | |||
| : (see r32419) | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32435 | |||
| particle | jhorwitz: yep | 19:42 | |
| jhorwitz | and the bird is the word? | 19:43 | |
| particle | you can email, as well, jeanine will take care of it quickly | ||
| either way, yes. | |||
| jhorwitz | what's her e-mail? | ||
| particle | mailto:jconforti@jdvhotels.com as it says on the wiki :P | ||
| jhorwitz doesn't RTFM just to annoy particle | 19:44 | ||
| chromatic doesn't backlog, just to annoy everyone | |||
| dalek | r32436 | pmichaud++ | rakon: | 19:47 | |
| : [rakudo]: update svn:ignore property | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32436 | |||
| particle | pmichaud: spectests pass, except for declaration-order (known) and S29-num/complex fails in the harness but not outside :( | 19:48 | |
| pmichaud | okay. I'm working on refactors now. | ||
| Tene | ohshit I need to figure out hotels | 19:52 | |
| jhorwitz | I CAN HAS HOTEL RUM? | ||
| Tene | HAY JHORWITZ! wanna share a room with me? | 19:54 | |
| oh, no, "prefer single room" | 19:55 | ||
| wiki++ | |||
| jhorwitz | Tene can RTFM, unlinke me | 19:56 | |
| ^unlike | |||
| Tene | RTFW | ||
| your W was upside-down. | 19:57 | ||
| jhorwitz | :) | ||
| Tene | The important question is whether I'll remember that this needs to be done long enough to do it, or if I'll just have to strong-arm my way into someone's room once I get there. | 19:58 | |
| dalek | r32437 | particle++ | rakon: | ||
| : [rakudo] s/mutable/objectref/ | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32437 | |||
| Tene | Oh, right, I got paid today, so I have money again kinda. | ||
| jhorwitz | $++ | ||
| masak | is List:Array::Mapping:Hash in Rakudo? | 20:02 | |
| pmichaud | somewhat, yes. | ||
| masak | ok. | ||
| pmichaud | there aren't many places that produce a Mapping. | ||
| at least, not that I've found yet. | |||
| masak | no. | ||
| should I put .fmt on Mapping then, not Hash? | 20:03 | ||
| seems other utility methods reside there. | 20:04 | ||
| pmichaud | it has a different meaning there? | ||
| I mean, .fmt on Mapping is different from .fmt on say, List ? | |||
| masak | pmichaud: aye. | ||
| pmichaud | I think the general rule of thumb is that non-modifying methods go on the immutable class, while modifying methods go on the mutable one | 20:05 | |
| so yes, .fmt would go on Mapping | |||
| masak | great | ||
| it turns out that implementing .fmt matches my level of experience with PIR quite nicely, so this is joyful work -- not too difficult, but still challenging. | 20:06 | ||
| pmichaud | excellent :-) | ||
| masak | is `new 'Iterator', self` same as `self.'iterator'()`? | 20:08 | |
| pmichaud | use either self.'iterator'() or iter self | 20:09 | |
| ('iter' is an opcode) | |||
| masak | oki | ||
| pmichaud | we're moving away from the new 'Iterator' approach. | ||
| masak | I see. | ||
| pmichaud: the difference between .fmt on List and .fmt on Mapping is that the former delegates to sprintf($fmt, $elem) for every element of the list, while the latter delegates to sprintf($fmt, $key, $value) for every pair of the mapping. | 20:11 | ||
| pmichaud | masak: okay, thanks | 20:13 | |
| masak | Mapping didn't have an 'iterator' method. adding it. | 20:15 | |
| pmichaud | note that 'iterator' for mapping is supposed to return Pairs, I think. See S09. | 20:25 | |
| and then all of .keys, .values, .kv, etc are supposed to be defined in terms of .iterator | 20:26 | ||
| (they aren't at present -- it's one of those things I've been wanting to fix) | |||
| (but needed to get containers working right first) | |||
| masak | um. so what do I do? my patch is done now, and I was just about to submit it to RT. but it does add an 'iterator' method to Mapping which iterates over keys, not pairs. | 20:37 | |
| is it enough if I remove the 'iterator' method from Mapping again, and rewrite the .fmt method to call the 'pairs' method instead? | 20:38 | ||
| if I do that, I could even delegate to the .fmt method in Pair :) | 20:39 | ||
| particle | that seems the right thing to do | ||
| masak | it does, doesn't it? | ||
| I'll just assume that pmichaud has replied 'yes' to the above. | 20:40 | ||
| dalek | r32438 | particle++ | rakon: | ||
| : [rakudo] add docs for IO's !VALUE() method | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32438 | |||
| particle | okay, pmichaud, i've done my review of the rakon branch diffs and corrected any wrongs i see. | 20:41 | |
| after your refactors, seems it's clear to merge with trunk. | |||
| masak | ok, I sent a patch to RT. I could have just committed it directly, I guess, but I'd like someone to review it and check that I haven't made any blatant mistakes. | 20:49 | |
| pmichaud | masak++ # I'll review the patch once I finish with rakon (in an hour or so) | 21:05 | |
| masak | perfect. gives me time to write today's blog post in the meantime. | 21:06 | |
| Tene | pmichaud: explain the name 'rakon' to me? | 21:08 | |
| oh, 'kontainer'? | |||
| pmichaud | short for "rakontainer" | ||
| masak | how kute. | ||
|
21:09
bacek joined
|
|||
| particle | masak: does 'join'() ever return a non-string? | 21:23 | |
| masak | particle: I'm trying to thing of a case when it does. | ||
| must be a corner case, feels like. | |||
| particle | i'm just hoping you checked, as i review your code :) | 21:24 | |
| masak | oh. | ||
| actually, I haven't reflected on that at all :/ | |||
| testing. | |||
| purl | testing is Don't use #perl for testing! or experiri vovere est or make tests pass for existing features, fail for unimplemented features and skip for wishlist features | ||
| masak slaps purl | 21:25 | ||
| purl | o/` Hit me baby, one more time o/` | ||
| masak | particle: seems 'join'() returns empty string on empty list | ||
| particle | also, the comment for Mapping::fmt should probably just say '...implicit call to sprintf on every pair...' | 21:26 | |
| masak: good news then :) | |||
| that's what i expected, but i wanted to make sure you thought about that | |||
| masak | particle: aye. didn't change the docs when I changed the code... | ||
| particle | ah | ||
| masak | particle: I hadn't -- have now :) | ||
| particle | um, you did change the docs, since 'fmt' is new | 21:27 | |
| masak | particle: no, I mean I wrote the code, wrote the docs, rewrote the Mapping sub, forgot to rewrite the docs for same, and submitted the patch. | 21:28 | |
| particle | i see. | ||
| masak | sorry if that wasn't clear :) | ||
| particle | one tiny nit, there's some trailing whitespace in every file but Pair.pir | 21:29 | |
| nbd, easy to clean | |||
| masak | I can fix that and the docs at the same time, and submit a new patch | ||
| did I add the trailing whitespace? must check again. | |||
| particle | yes, you did | 21:30 | |
| i'm just reviewing the patch file, i didn't apply it | |||
| masak | particle: are you referring to the fact that there are two newlines after some subs? | ||
| particle | no | ||
| masak | ...but to...? | 21:31 | |
| pmichaud | lines that have a space before the newline | ||
| masak | ah. | ||
| yes, that's ungood. | |||
| will remove and resend | |||
| pmichaud | I'm running spectest now for the rakon branch merge | ||
| there's still a fair bit of refactoring I want to do, but I think I can do it in trunk. | |||
| particle | my initial review looks good otherwise, masak++. | 21:32 | |
| masak | yay! | ||
| particle | pmichaud: i agree, there's not much to refactor in the branch | ||
| pmichaud | most of the classes/*.pir files have gotten pretty crufty lately | ||
| particle | Any doesn't have a default ACCEPTS? | 21:34 | |
| pmichaud | it probably inherits from Object | ||
| particle | Object.pir doesn't define ACCEPTS either | 21:35 | |
| it does, however, define REJECTS in terms of ACCEPTS | |||
|
21:36
ruoso joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | what should .ACCEPTS return on Object/Any ? | 21:36 | |
| particle | if it's an abstract method at that point, than an exception | 21:37 | |
| pmichaud | ...isn't that what happens now? ;-) | ||
| particle | :P | ||
| that's false laziness | 21:38 | ||
| masak | Any Any scalars are identical $_ === X | ||
| according to S03 | |||
| but I dunno if that's relevant to what you're discussing. | |||
| particle | ok then, it should .return (self) | ||
| pmichaud | no, it should probably do infix:<===>(self, topic) | ||
| masak | aye. | ||
| particle | i'd better switch back to trunk before i code this up | 21:39 | |
| masak: does the spec say anything about Object? | |||
| masak | particle: no. | ||
| pmichaud | that's partially why I left it out. | 21:40 | |
|
21:40
japhb joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | If the spec doesn't say one is there, and the spectests don't require one, I'm not a fan of adding one. | 21:41 | |
| particle | okie | ||
| dalek | r32439 | pmichaud++ | rakon: | 21:43 | |
| : [rakudo]: Some final refactors ( !VALUE --> Scalar ) before merge to trunk | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32439 | |||
| chromatic | TimToady, ping | 21:49 | |
| dalek | r32440 | fperrad++ | trunk: | 21:58 | |
| : [ook] | |||
| : - fix syntax | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32440 | |||
| r32441 | pmichaud++ | trunk: | 22:08 | ||
| : [rakudo]: merge rakon branch to trunk | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32441 | |||
| r32442 | pmichaud++ | rakon: | |||
| : Remove completed rakon branch. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=32442 | |||
|
22:19
bacek joined
|
|||
| bacek | good morning | 22:19 | |
| Am I only one who can't update RT tickets? | 22:20 | ||
| Infinoid | bacek: where does it fail? | ||
| bacek | Infinoid: on web. When I try to attach new version of patch it returns empty page after timeout. | 22:21 | |
|
22:21
magnachef joined
|
|||
| bacek | And my emails to perl-bug-followup just disappearing... | 22:21 | |
| pmichaud | I'm posting to RT right now w/o any difficulty. | 22:22 | |
| bacek | pmichaud: hm... It's new ticket? | 22:24 | |
| or update of old one? | |||
|
22:26
register joined
|
|||
| cognominal | > my foo $i; | 22:26 | |
| No handler to delete. | |||
| this is weird, it triggers an error in the scheduler | |||
| masak | I recognize that error. someone got it the other day when accessing variables that hadn't been initialized with 'my'. | 22:27 | |
| pmichaud | bacek: update of existing tickets. | ||
| bacek | pmichaud: yak... Ok, I'll try again. | 22:28 | |
| 'Waiting for rt.perl.org'... | |||
| Ho! It works. But I'm using different provider ATM... | 22:29 | ||
| (Australian internet)-- | |||
| masak | cognominal: rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60304 | ||
| bacek | pmichaud: I've attached new 'succ'/'pred' to #60390. | 22:30 | |
| I also changed S03/autoincrement.t but scary to commit it... | |||
| - $.value += 42; | 22:31 | ||
| + Incrementor.new( value => $.value + 42); | |||
|
22:32
jsut|work joined
|
|||
| masak sees the name 'Incrementor', thinks it's an awful name, then realizes he wrote that test a while ago | 22:32 | ||
| bacek | :) | ||
| masak: I'm going to commit my changes in spec. Now your turn to fix it :) | 22:33 | ||
| masak | heh. | ||
| I'm a doctor, not a Rakudo programmer! | 22:34 | ||
| bacek | masak: take it easy. It's even not in Parrot svn :) | 22:35 | |
| masak | bacek: I'm not sure I grok that last comment. | 22:36 | |
| isn't Rakudo using the Pugs test suite? in what way would a test be in Parrot svn? | |||
| bacek | 'succ'/'pred' should return new objects, not modify self in-place... | ||
| masak | right. | 22:37 | |
| bacek | 'not a Rakudo programmer' :) | ||
| masak | well, maybe a little... | ||
| bacek | Just wear a hat of 'Pugs programmer' and fix it :) | ||
| masak | heh | ||
|
22:38
Whiteknight joined
|
|||
| masak | bacek: so you're saying I should fix Pugs? :) | 22:38 | |
| cognominal | rule scoped { | 22:39 | |
| <fulltypename>* ... | |||
| should not that be <fulltypename>? | |||
| bacek | masak: indeed :) | 22:40 | |
| masak | cognominal: I think I've seen examples in the spec with two or more fulltypenames | ||
| particle | my Int Str $x; | 22:44 | |
|
22:44
magnachef__ joined
|
|||
| particle | $x = "3"; | 22:44 | |
|
22:44
Ademan joined
|
|||
| masak | particle: that's not an Int. | 22:44 | |
| particle | no, it's an Int Str :) | 22:45 | |
| masak | particle: were you present when we discussed Int Str on #perl the other week? | ||
| particle | i used a poor example, maybe, but you can have more than one type | ||
| yes, i was on #perl6 | |||
| masak | ah, meant that. | ||
| particle: it is perhaps more evident that you can when N-1 of the types are roles | 22:46 | ||
| particle | my Serializable Printable Singleton Int = 3; | ||
| masak | 'xactly | 22:47 | |
| bacek | my Unspeakable Evil Int :) | 22:48 | |
| have to go in 20 minutes (if I can trust battery meter in laptop :) | 22:50 | ||
| Whiteknight | kjs here? | ||
| kjs? | |||
| purl | it has been said that kjs is Klaas-Jan Stol <mailto:parrotcode@gmail.com> from The Netherlands or KHTML (read Safari/Koqueror)'s JavaScript engine... or called kj these days. | ||
|
22:50
magnachef joined
22:51
particle1 joined,
Debolaz__ joined,
Aisling_ joined,
jhorwitz_ joined
22:52
Hinrik_ joined
|
|||
| bacek | What happened on 2008-10-05? -70 passing tests... | 22:54 | |
|
22:54
Theory joined,
rhr joined,
hachi joined,
awwaiid joined,
gmansi joined,
Andy joined,
Infinoid joined
22:55
contingencyplan joined,
slavorgn joined
|
|||
| bacek | afk # flat batteries... | 22:57 | |
| cognominal | thx | 23:01 | |
|
23:06
Psyche^ joined
|
|||
| chromatic | Oh boy, a Unicode bug! | 23:12 | |
| masak | *gasp* | ||
| chromatic: rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58820 | 23:15 | ||
|
23:19
idemal joined
|
|||
| chromatic | Oh boy, a Unicode bug with IMCC implications! | 23:30 | |
| Tell me it has to run on GCC 2.96 on Mac OS X and I'll be the happiest boy in the world! | 23:31 | ||
| pmichaud | 58820 is the one that prompted my ticket. | ||
| I don't think there are IMCC implications on this one -- it's just the escape opcode. | |||
| The escape opcode is producing a string with NUL bytes, which when fed back into IMCC causes compile errors. But the NUL bytes shouldn't be there. | 23:32 | ||
| chromatic | Yeah, that sounds reasonably easy to diagnose. | ||
| I'll take a look in a little while. | |||
| pmichaud | Excellent. | ||
|
23:34
mire joined
23:36
Ademan joined
|
|||
| jonathan | pmichaud: hi - how's the branch gone? | 23:41 | |
| pmichaud | it's gone. | ||
| jonathan | Not had chance to look... | ||
| Oh, merged? | |||
| purl | well, merged is fine | ||
| pmichaud | as in, merged to trunk. | ||
| jonathan | All bugs fixed? | ||
| pmichaud | yes. | ||
| jonathan | pmichaud++ | ||
| pmichaud | new ones found and fixed also. | ||
| jonathan | Nice work! | ||
| pmichaud | I'm closing out tickets. | ||
| jonathan | Great! | ||
| pmichaud | I've closed about 6 tickets thus far | ||
| jonathan | Wow. | 23:42 | |
| Nice work. | |||
| pmichaud | 58340, 58526, 58744, 58578, 59382 so far | ||
| masak | pmichaud++ | ||
|
23:44
Limbic_Region joined
|
|||
| jonathan | Wow. | 23:45 | |
| jonathan is impressed | 23:46 | ||
| pmichaud | there's also probably quite a few passing spectests that need to be unskipped or untodo'd | ||
| I didn't update the spectest suite yet. | |||
| jonathan | Well, there's a script for that. ;-) | ||
| pmichaud | I'm hoping I can also use other people's tuits for that, too :-) | 23:47 | |
| I'm saving my tuits for other things. | |||
| jonathan | Sure, good plan. | 23:48 | |
|
23:58
magnachef__ joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | perl6.ops:63: warning: request for implicit conversion from ‘void *’ to ‘struct PMC *’ not permitted in C++ | 23:59 | |
| easy fix or file a ticket? | |||