|
Parrot 1.1.0 Released | parrot.org/ | 332 RTs left Set by moderator on 26 April 2009. |
|||
| edd | and living in... | 00:00 | |
| PLATFORMS says no-one has reported this to work on OpenBSD..yay | 00:01 | ||
| darbelo | edd: What doesn't work on OpenBSD? | 00:02 | |
| edd | i dunno yet :p | ||
| im looking for build instructions | |||
| no autogrunk... refreshing :p | |||
| darbelo | I'm runnig svn HEAD on OpenBSD without any trouble. | 00:03 | |
| rg | oh look. smolder is back. openbsd is just fine: smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_pr...ails/20447 | ||
| shorten | rg's url is at xrl.us/beqmz8 | ||
| cotto | OpenBSD was failing one test until recently, but darbelo submitted a fix for it. Other than that it seems to work fine. | 00:04 | |
| rg | darbelo++ # thanks for that | ||
| edd | darbelo: do i know you from the OpenBSD community? | ||
| darbelo | Not likely. I avoid misc@ like the *****ing plague. | 00:05 | |
| edd | its erm... yes amusing | ||
| i had to ask, as its a small world in openbsd | 00:06 | ||
| darbelo: anyway hi, im "the TeX guy" as i get called | 00:07 | ||
| nice to meet you all | |||
| but the build does somewhat fail | 00:08 | ||
| pastebin.com/m3629f541 | |||
| darbelo | what version of parrot are you building? | ||
| rg | and on what version of openbsd | 00:09 | |
|
00:09
AndyA joined
|
|||
| darbelo | That error only happens on post 4.4 systems, so he's running 4.5 or -current | 00:09 | |
| edd | -current natrually | 00:10 | |
| :p | |||
| darbelo | I submitted a patch for it, he might have a parrot from before it went into the tree. | ||
| edd | 1.0.0 | 00:11 | |
| shall i svn? | |||
| darbelo | IIRC the pach aplied cleanly on 1.0, it's fairly trivial. | ||
| edd | i dont mind running svn if it works | 00:12 | |
| Whiteknight | edd, svn is definitely the best route | ||
| rg | it should be in 1.1 | ||
| i believe this is the commit: trac.parrot.org/parrot/changeset/38215 | |||
| darbelo | Yep. That one. | 00:13 | |
| Nut svn is the better route, since at least one OpenBSD test failure got fixed in the meantime. | 00:15 | ||
| Whiteknight | I think it's safe to assume that most users of OpenBSD should be competent with svn | 00:17 | |
| Infinoid | Actually, I've been hoping to get more testing on openbsd | 00:28 | |
| So, does it work? :) | |||
| The pkgsrc maintainer submitted quite a few fixes, most of them went into the 1.1 release but I think they're all in current svn. | 00:29 | ||
| darbelo | Infinoid: Yes it works. You can ping me if it doesn't. | ||
| rg | infinoid: it seems with darbelo and mikehh and now edd, we'll have more openbsd testers than freebsd ;) | ||
| Infinoid | Thanks. I wouldn't mind adding evidence of that to the PLATFORMS file, if you care to provide a patch | ||
| edd | pkgsrc = netbsd | ||
| ok ill tr ysvn | 00:30 | ||
| Infinoid | Yeah, but many of the bugs he patched were also reported on openbsd. | ||
| I recall at least 3 overlapping tickets | |||
| edd | parrot is not actually in openbsd yet | ||
| if it works at next realease I can get it in | |||
| darbelo | Infinoid: I was talking about svn. | 00:31 | |
| Infinoid | I think the netbsd pkgsrc is still applying patches to 1.0.0... but my goal is to make svn work perfectly :) | ||
| edd | the bsds hate porting hand rolled svn releases | 00:32 | |
| as we have to host the tarball ourselves | |||
| Infinoid | understandable. But if svn works, 1.2.0 will be more likely to work as well | ||
| edd | aye indeed | 00:33 | |
| i will certainly let you know what happens | |||
| Infinoid | edd++ | 00:34 | |
| darbelo | Also. Whats the policy on passign TODO-ed tests? | ||
| cotto | darbelo, it depends on the test | 00:35 | |
| some of them are feature-specific, others are platform issues. | 00:36 | ||
| rg | darbelo: i would suggest to open a ticket with a patch to remove the todo and ask for testers | ||
| darbelo | In particular: some recent changes in libc made some TODOed tests start passing. Thing is: older version of OpenBSD will still fail. | ||
| Infinoid | yeah, those are tricky. we can do platform-specific skips/todos tho | 00:37 | |
| rg | infinoid: i think platform-version specific is quite tricky | 00:38 | |
| darbelo | Can we detect OpenBSD <= 4.4? | ||
| Infinoid | rg: Yeah. Often easier to just fix the code to pass the test :) | 00:40 | |
| cotto | darbelo, is there anything in config_lib.pasm that gives us enough information? | ||
| darbelo | I'll check. | 00:41 | |
| cotto | I suspect there won't be, but it's worth looking. | 00:42 | |
| Infinoid | is it worth putting code in the os-specific hints file to detect the os version? | 00:43 | |
| for linux, at least, I suspect the versions of gcc and glibc are more relevant than the kernel version | 00:44 | ||
| darbelo | on *BSD you can get the version of the entire OS with uname. | 00:45 | |
| rg | for linux you have to detect the subsystem that actually has the fix that is making your tests pass. on *bsd you get all in one. | 00:46 | |
| Infinoid | here that gives you the kernel version, but the userspace is completely detached from that | ||
| yeah. | |||
| unless you want to go distro-specific, which... no. | |||
| Hmm, it's been a while since I've testd parrot on dragonfly, I ought to get that going again. | 00:48 | ||
| darbelo | Gave config_lib.pasm a once-over. Nothing ovbious there. I'll go eat something, and check again later. | 00:51 | |
|
01:02
eternaleye joined
|
|||
| edd | build works | 01:09 | |
| running regress tests | |||
| Coke | dduncan: catching up, but stable releases will still go on CPAN. | 01:12 | |
| so 1.4 is the next one to expect. | 01:13 | ||
|
01:19
LylePerl joined
|
|||
| edd | All tests successful (1 subtest UNEXPECTEDLY SUCCEEDED), 16 tests and 572 subtests skipped. | 01:43 | |
| dduncan | so that's how it is | ||
| Infinoid | edd: Great. would you mind giving us a line we can put into PLATFORMS? | 01:51 | |
| dalek | rrot: r38380 | pmichaud++ | trunk (2 files): r38381 | pmichaud++ | trunk/DEPRECATED.pod: |
01:53 | |
|
01:53
dalek joined
|
|||
| rg | dalek really doesn't like the ellipsis character that trac is handing it | 01:55 | |
| edd | Infinoid: what about the unexpected pass | ||
| rg | edd: probably the one that darbelo mentioned | ||
| edd | i have no idea what all the stuff is in platfroms | 01:56 | |
| i do know it doesnt fit in an 80 wide terminal | |||
| :p | |||
| Infinoid | well, it's one line per tested target platform | ||
| rg | actually it does. 80 chars precisely. | 01:57 | |
| Infinoid | the openbsd flags are probably pretty similar to netbsd's... there is a legend below the tables | ||
| rg | infinoid: do you have a log why dalek crashed? | 01:58 | |
| rg | hey! why didn't this one get converted? | 02:00 | |
| edd | rg: it should wrap at <78 | 02:01 | |
| rg | edd: not my call and i guess opinions differ on that. | ||
| edd | aye | ||
| Infinoid | rg: I have a daemontools log. The bot is run with 2>&1, so stderr and stdout are mixed in a weird way | 02:03 | |
| I have some wide character warnings, and some PRIVMSG debug lines with some unicode (pmichaud's commit message), but no actual error message | 02:04 | ||
| rg | something in the wide/unicode character must be killing it | ||
| Infinoid | Yeah, it must be judging from the timing of its quits... but I can't reproduce it here with the same code (running under a test wrapper) on the same rev of perl | 02:07 | |
| rg | neither could i. | ||
| pmichaud | something else must be putting unicode in the messages, as I don't think I did it. | ||
| rg | pmichaud: trac is converting some ... into an ellipsis character | ||
| Infinoid | yeah, trac must be collapsing it. | 02:08 | |
| rg | it is. you can tell if you're trying to select the text on the timeline page. | 02:09 | |
| it's not even consequent about it. it doesn't do it on the changeset page | 02:10 | ||
| Infinoid | right. I think it's time for me to write a testsuite for this mess of rss parsers | ||
| dalek | rrot: r38382 | pmichaud++ | trunk (2 files): [p6object]: Update stringification of protoobjects (TT #168). |
02:15 | |
| rrot: r38383 | chromatic++ | trunk/src/hash.c: [src] Added a minor optimization to parrot_hash_get_bucket() to avoid some somewhere between four and eight entries in the hash. |
|||
| rrot: r38384 | jkeenan++ | trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd30_install.pod: Correct POD formatting for '<' and '>' inside other POD strings. |
02:43 | ||
|
02:48
janus joined
03:23
gaurav joined
04:02
tetragon joined
04:34
jhorwitz joined
04:45
japhb joined
05:10
flh joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r38385 | pmichaud++ | trunk/runtime/parrot/library/P6object.pir: [p6object]: Differentiate a NameSpace object from the NameSpace protoobject. |
05:52 | |
| cotto | pmichaud, ping | 06:06 | |
|
06:11
uniejo joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r38386 | Infinoid++ | trunk/PLATFORMS: I just tested parrot successfully on dragonfly bsd; add it to PLATFORMS. |
06:20 | |
|
06:28
iblechbot joined
06:36
amoc joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | cotto: pong | 06:42 | |
|
06:48
dalek joined
06:50
amoc joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | time for sleep here... be back in a few hours | 06:51 | |
| cotto | d'oh | 06:56 | |
| moritz | maybe a mail would be easier? | 06:58 | |
| cotto | pmichaud, whenever you get back, what's a good approach to optimizing a PGE grammar? I'm thinking about the pmc compiler in branches/pmc_pct specifically, but a general approach would also be nice. | ||
| moritz, I like to inconvenience people (including myself) with synchronous communication. | |||
| moritz | ;-) | 06:59 | |
| cotto | (which translates to "you're probably right") | ||
| moritz | argh, I forgot a {*} again | ||
|
07:17
masak joined,
Fayland_logger joined
07:24
dduncan left
08:11
HG` joined
08:16
riffraff joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r38387 | chromatic++ | trunk/t/pmc/key.t: [t] Removed a TODO test marker for which a test exists and passes. |
08:18 | |
|
08:43
bacek joined
08:45
amoc joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r38388 | chromatic++ | trunk/src/pmc/hash.pmc: [PMC] Optimized keyed lookup slightly. Hash get, exists, and delete operations operations do store the Key STRING, so they need COW STRINGs (RT #60128). The Hash PMC has a new static function to make a read-only STRING from a Key. This optimization improves PGE performance by around 3.5%, in my rough benchmarks. |
08:50 | |
|
09:38
amoc joined
|
|||
| cotto | coke, ping | 09:39 | |
|
09:45
amoc joined
09:53
amoc joined,
FL2 joined
|
|||
| cotto | Coke_zzz, unping | 09:53 | |
| bacek | good evening, people of past | 09:59 | |
| cotto: any thought about DOTPLAN in pmc_pct? | 10:00 | ||
|
10:00
pancake joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r38389 | bacek++ | branches/pmc_pct/compilers/nqp (3 files): [nqp] Reimplement self as lexical. pmichaud++ for explanations |
10:02 | |
| pancake | =$*IN doesnt works in rakudo. is this the right place to talk abouit it? | 10:05 | |
| bacek | pancake: #perl6 at freenode | ||
| pancake: prefix:<=> was deprecated. Use .get | 10:06 | ||
| pancake | ok | 10:07 | |
| thanks | |||
| bacek | no worries :) | ||
| cotto | bacek, I toyed with trying to optimize the grammar, but I don't know PCT well enough to comment intelligently on the plan. | 10:08 | |
| pancake | why =$*IN was deprecated? | ||
| $*IN.get() is looong :) | |||
| bacek | pancake: Some conceptual issues. Ask TimToady at #perl6 :) | ||
| pancake | hehe, ok i can imagine which them | 10:09 | |
| szabgab.com/talks/perl6/perl6-given.html this tuto should be updated then | |||
| szabgab | pancake, I am working on it | ||
| bacek | definitely. prefix:<=> was deprecated ~week ago | 10:10 | |
| pancake | szabgab: wow :) fast response! great | ||
| bacek | welcome to 21st century :) | ||
| dalek | rrot: r38390 | jonathan++ | trunk/config/init/hints/mswin32.pm: [config] Bump up memory older versions of MS VC++ are allowed to use, in order to keep Rakudo compiling. |
10:11 | |
| cotto | bacek, did you ask pmichaud about optimizing at all? | 10:13 | |
| szabgab | pancake, actually probably you'll want to use prompt() | ||
| pancake | $fh.readline is also deprecated? | 10:15 | |
| cotto | msg coke It looks like partcl will also need to be updated to use the 'hll_map' method before it'll work with svn head. | 10:16 | |
| purl | Message for coke stored. | ||
| szabgab | pancake, nope | 10:20 | |
| that should work, just for stdin you probably want prompt | |||
| but probably better switch to #perl6 | |||
| bacek | cotto: not yet. | 10:22 | |
| cotto: I don't quite care about speed at this point of time... Make it is first target. | 10:23 | ||
| cotto: but from my observations back-tracking takes a lot of time :-/ | 10:24 | ||
| cotto: it was main reason to throw few :: in grammar | |||
| cotto | I wish we had some pir profiling tools. | 10:29 | |
| which doesn't really accomplish much | |||
| msg coke What do I need to run partcl? I got it to build with r37500, but it complains about not being able to find languages/tcl/runtime/tcllib.pbc when I try to run a hello world. | 10:41 | ||
| purl | Message for coke stored. | ||
| cotto | time for sleep | ||
|
10:44
kid51 joined
10:45
frodwith joined
11:06
amoc joined
11:20
dalek joined
11:24
cognominal joined
11:45
amoc joined
11:49
ruoso joined
11:56
amoc joined
|
|||
| Coke | cotto; I'm back. | 11:59 | |
| msg cotto tcl /doesn't/ run. allison has done some legwork on finding things (this being one of them) - fixing them as I get to them. =-) | 12:00 | ||
| purl | Message for cotto stored. | ||
| Coke sees someone refer to pm as Dr. Michaud and will henceforth call pmichaud "Doc" in his internal monologue. | 12:04 | ||
| msg cotto we only use .hll_map in one place; should be an easy fix. | 12:06 | ||
| purl | Message for cotto stored. | ||
|
12:09
rdice joined
|
|||
| dalek | rtcl: r332 | wcoleda++ | trunk/runtime/tcllib.pir: .HLL_map was removed |
12:20 | |
| Coke | msg cotto code.google.com/p/partcl/source/detail?r=332 | 12:21 | |
| purl | Message for cotto stored. | ||
|
12:38
amoc joined,
rg1 joined
12:39
iblechbot joined
12:45
amoc joined
|
|||
| Coke wonders how rakudo is getting 'ldflags' to build its pmcs. | 12:45 | ||
| ah. because you're still using the deprecated (but apparently functional) perl scripts, while I'm using the recommended (and broken) makefile. | 12:47 | ||
| Coke sighs. | |||
| Coke leaves partcl to rot for a while longer. | |||
|
13:00
sjn joined
13:10
gryphon joined
13:12
amoc joined
|
|||
| edd | moin | 13:14 | |
|
13:19
amoc joined
|
|||
| Infinoid | good morning | 13:31 | |
| Coke | NO IT ISNT! | 13:36 | |
| ahem. | |||
| rg | when is it ever ;P | 13:37 | |
| Infinoid | $dayofweek ne 'Monday' is a good start for me | 13:39 | |
|
14:25
register joined
|
|||
| Coke wonders if he can easily inspect what's getting sent to smolder before ... smolding. | 14:42 | ||
|
14:44
Infinoid joined
|
|||
| rg | run $(PERL) t/harness $(EXTRA_TEST_ARGS) --core-tests --archive (i.e. without --send-to-smolder) and look at parrot_test_run.tar.gz | 14:44 | |
| r | |||
| EXTRA_TEST_ARGS = --gc-debug --running-make-test | 14:45 | ||
| btw if the one running smolder is reading: i'm getting a 500 server error response when submitting reports, although they seem to be transmitted just fine. | 14:46 | ||
| Coke | that's mpeters, he's not usually here. | 14:51 | |
| can't hurt to open a ticket. | |||
| rg | in trac? i doubt that'll make a difference | ||
| Coke | that's where issues about our use of smolder go, yes. | 15:00 | |
|
15:00
Eevee joined
|
|||
| particle- | you can copy mpeters, if you think it'll help | 15:06 | |
| mpeters@plusthree.com | 15:07 | ||
|
15:11
HG` joined
|
|||
| Coke | mpeters? | 15:19 | |
| mpeters is mpeters@plusthree.com | |||
|
15:43
darbelo joined
15:47
pjcj joined
|
|||
| Tene | Is there a 'Bruce Keeler' in the channel? | 15:55 | |
|
15:57
AkRa joined
|
|||
| AkRa | Hi, guys | 15:57 | |
| Infinoid | hi, AkRa | ||
| AkRa | I'm from Alicante, Spain | 15:58 | |
|
15:58
edd_ joined
|
|||
| AkRa | I'm just preparing a lecture on Parrot for tomorrow morning. | 15:59 | |
| It will focus mainly on PIR | |||
| Tene | Hi, AkRa! | 16:00 | |
|
16:00
flh joined
|
|||
| AkRa | Most of the material is here: pelele.pbworks.com/Procesamiento%20...%C3%A1mico | 16:00 | |
| shorten | AkRa's url is at xrl.us/beqpdm | ||
| AkRa | I'm afraid it is in spanish only | 16:01 | |
| just to let you know Parrot will be presented in another university course | 16:02 | ||
| Any suggestions for a one session lecture on Parrot will be welcome | 16:03 | ||
| moritz | PCT might be a good topic | 16:04 | |
| building a compiler in one hour, or so | |||
| Tene | That's my traditional 1-hour presentation. | 16:05 | |
|
16:06
Theory joined
|
|||
| moritz | so the advice should be "steal from Tene" :-) | 16:06 | |
| Tene | Sure. | ||
| www.opensourcetv.tv/video/15.html is video of one of them | |||
| I'll try to record my presentation this weekend, too. | |||
| AkRa | Yeah, that's fine! | 16:07 | |
| Tene | I plan to end with adding support to mod_parrot, if I have time. | ||
| pmichaud | here's mine: pmichaud.com/2009/pres/npw-pct/ | ||
| (slides only for now) | |||
| AkRa | Thanks, a lot, Tene, pmichaud ! | 16:09 | |
| Tene | AkRa: please let me know if there's anything else I can do to help with your presentation. | ||
| AkRa | I think I should had to stop by here one week ago :) | 16:10 | |
| pmichaud | I'm not sure that it's valid to prepare presentations more than 24 hours in advance. :-P | 16:11 | |
| AkRa | :D | ||
| Just a thing: It's 'Polymorphic Container' the new 'official' name for PMC? | 16:12 | ||
| I just don't find 'Parrot Magic Cookie' anymore on the doc | 16:13 | ||
| Coke | Allison retro-named it, yes. | ||
| AkRa | Ok | 16:14 | |
| darbelo | I liked the old name better :) | 16:15 | |
| moritz too | |||
|
16:15
gaurav joined
16:16
braceta joined
|
|||
| Infinoid | mmm, cookies | 16:16 | |
| AkRa | Tene, pmichaud : Can I link to your urls from my Parrot page? | 16:18 | |
| pmichaud | AkRa: definitely. | ||
| Tene | AkRa: Yes. | ||
| AkRa | Thanks, they will be of great help! | 16:19 | |
| pmichaud | #parrotsketch in 130 | 16:21 | |
| afk, lunch | 16:22 | ||
| Infinoid | You know, I really like having a weekly #ps. It makes me constantly ask myself "what have I done for Parrot lately?" | ||
|
16:27
whoppix joined
|
|||
| NotFound | I think the official name for PMC is 'PMC' ;) | 16:32 | |
| AkRa | there is no confusion, there ;) | ||
| NotFound | Em, is also called Parrot_PMC from embed | 16:33 | |
| AkRa | Thanks a lot, everybody. Have a nice day! | 16:35 | |
| NotFound | AkRa: I'm from Spain, too | ||
| AkRa | Nice! are you involved in Parrot development? | 16:37 | |
| NotFound | AkRa: yes, since last summer | ||
|
16:38
ilia joined
|
|||
| AkRa | Wow, so may be I can bother you with some naive questions about it in the following days, should I? | 16:39 | |
| NotFound | AkRa: a tip: use say instead of print in the examples. | ||
| AkRa: sure! | |||
| AkRa | Ah, ok | ||
| In fact, the presentation was done last year, I must update it a little | 16:40 | ||
| See you! | 16:58 | ||
|
16:58
AkRa left
|
|||
| moritz | Infinoid: it seems that dalek on #perl6 has stopped reporting, again | 16:59 | |
| Infinoid: I've killed its process on feather a few times in the past two days, and it respawned, but it doesn't seem to last long | |||
| Infinoid | Yeah, it hasn't reported any rakudo commits in here since the 22nd | 17:00 | |
| wish I knew what changed. | |||
| I have a wrapper script that I've been testing the feed parsers with, but it really needs a full testsuite | 17:01 | ||
| Been meaning to add one, but finding a new job takes priority | |||
| moritz | sure | 17:04 | |
| Coke | you know cold fusion? =-) | ||
| moritz | if I knew, I'd be eligible for the Nobel Prize ;-) | 17:05 | |
|
17:08
Andy joined
17:14
seyedx joined
17:16
braceta left
|
|||
| jonathan | parrotsketch is now or in one hour? | 17:31 | |
| Util | 1 hour | ||
| jonathan | ok, thanks | ||
|
17:40
chromatic joined
|
|||
| Coke | chromatic: hey, c. | 17:44 | |
| chromatic | morning | 17:48 | |
|
17:55
jan joined
|
|||
| Infinoid | chromatic: A blog post of yours from a few days ago made me itch to check out MooseX::Declare, but I ended up getting bogged down reading a bunch of Moose documentation to figure out simple things (like where to put the field initializer logic I'd normally put in new()). | 17:58 | |
| It's great stuff, but it is deceptively simple. For people like me who are not yet familiar with Moose, there are some pretty deep potholes. :) | |||
| Coke | Infinoid: rolsky just wrote a bunch of docs. | ||
| chromatic | It could use a book.... | ||
| Coke | I would imagine rolsky would be a good person for that. | ||
| Coke assigns a partcl ticket to cotto. | |||
| Infinoid | The syntactic changes are great. The semantic changes are taking me a little longer to figure out. | 18:01 | |
|
18:14
barney joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | time for #ps ? | 18:33 | |
| Util | yes | ||
|
18:42
allison joined,
chromatic joined,
seyedx joined,
Andy joined,
ilia joined,
Theory joined,
darbelo joined,
Eevee joined,
Infinoid joined,
gryphon joined,
rdice joined,
ruoso joined,
cognominal joined,
frodwith joined,
FL2 joined,
bacek joined,
japhb joined,
jhorwitz joined,
particle- joined,
contingencyplan joined,
Coke joined,
jsut joined,
zostay_ joined,
samlh joined,
Ademan joined,
szabgab joined,
s1n joined,
cheflog__ joined,
particle2 joined,
TonyC joined,
nopaste joined,
rblackwe joined,
silug joined,
estrabd joined,
rhr joined,
TimToady joined,
cotto joined,
Khisanth joined,
Tene joined,
buildbot joined,
purl joined,
Aisling joined,
mmpf joined,
lucs_ joined,
tewk_ joined,
dngor joined,
confound joined,
workbench joined,
ingy joined,
cxreg joined,
spinclad joined
|
|||
| Coke | allison: compiling if you keep the build dir around is "not compiling". =-) | 18:45 | |
| chromatic | Baby Steps! | ||
| purl | i heard baby steps was getting the test reforms done. I'm starting to have fun, even. | ||
| chromatic | YOU COULD START TO HAVE FUN TOO, even. | ||
| Coke | the hll map stuff is gone. | ||
| chromatic: I highly doubt that. | |||
| Infinoid | chromatic: Oh, wow. irclog.perlgeek.de/parrotsketch/today doesn't have any of our reports from before the split | 18:46 | |
| allison | Coke: right, but those are problems with Parrot, not with Partcl | ||
| chromatic | Tcl does set an upper bounds on the fun you can have. | ||
| Infinoid | Not even my "hi!" | ||
| Coke | allison: ... yes, it's parrot's fault. I completely agree. =-) | ||
| allison | Coke: and, I know how to fix them | 18:47 | |
| Infinoid | pmichaud: I have an IRC log of the other side, I can paste after #ps is over | ||
| pmichaud | Infinoid: well, it's harder for me to comment on what others said if I can't read it :-( | 18:48 | |
| Infinoid | pmichaud: ah. one sec, I'll throw it on the web | ||
| pmichaud | Infinoid++ | ||
| Infinoid | pmichaud: quack.glines.org/upload/infinoid/log.txt | 18:49 | |
| allison | Util: I'm already building the parrot book to a PDF. I can set you up with access to my build infrastructure if you'd like. | ||
| Util: oh, but yes, it can't be a 'make' target because it has too many external dependencies | 18:50 | ||
| Coke | allison: if it depends on external tools, that doesn't really matter. | 18:51 | |
| it's ok if "make book" fails with a missing dep. | |||
| (and if you check in something with failures, someone can downgrade them to a nice error message.) | 18:53 | ||
|
18:53
schmalbe joined
|
|||
| Infinoid | pmichaud++ # congratulations on the release and the huge number of passing tests! | 18:53 | |
| allison | okay. It needs Pod::Simple (a recent version, not the ancient one checked into Parrot), Pod::PseudoPod, Pod::PseudoPod::LaTeX, and a latex-to-pdf converter, something like 'pdflatex' | 18:54 | |
| chromatic | Probably a patched P::PP::L too. | 18:55 | |
| Coke | (ancient one) why don't we upgrade? | ||
| if we're going to have any copy at all. | |||
| allison | oh, yes, I'm using an extensively patched version of P::PP:L | 19:00 | |
| Coke: because we're planning to remove the dependency (not keep one checked in) | 19:01 | ||
| Util | I had to patch my P::PP:L to get as far as LaTeX output. | ||
| cotto | Coke, against which revision of Parrot do you think it'll be easiest to get partcl to build? | ||
| allison | Coke: but, upgrading to the new version is what's holding us back from that | ||
| cotto: it builds against 1.0 | |||
| Coke | ... "sort of", yes. | 19:02 | |
| allison | cotto: would be nice to do 1.1, but it still uses .HLL_map | ||
| cotto | s/build/run hello world/ | ||
| Coke | allison: no, it doesn't. | ||
| cotto | sorry, thinko | ||
| allison | Coke: oh, did you remove .HLL_map? great! | ||
| Util | allison: do you have some "include"ing wrapper that is not checked in? I did not see where anything merged the chapters into a single book PDF. | 19:04 | |
| chromatic | I don't think we ever automated that. | 19:05 | |
| allison | Util: nothing is checked in here, it's in the Onyx Neon repository | ||
| with build scripts, the patched versions of the modules, etc | |||
|
19:07
cognominal joined
|
|||
| Util | Any reason not to move the build scripts (at least building to PDF, maybe not to the O.N. make-a-real-book format) into Parrot repo, and module patches into the CPAN modules? I could provide the manpower, if that is the only holdup. | 19:11 | |
| Allowing anyone (who has the externals installed) to build the PDF at anytime seems like a Good Thing to me. Always good to be able to edit while reading final-form. | |||
| chromatic | No objection here, save that it has external deps. | 19:12 | |
| dalek | tracwiki: v66 | chromatic++ | WikiStart | 19:13 | |
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/WikiSt...ction=diff | |||
| shorten | dalek's url is at xrl.us/beqqd7 | ||
| allison | Util: I can send you the scripts and the modified version of P::PP::L | 19:14 | |
| Util | allison: thanks! | 19:15 | |
| moderator | Parrot 1.1.0 Released | parrot.org/ | 332 RTs left | Weekly Priority: Remove Deprecated Items | 19:16 | |
| dalek | tracwiki: v10 | coke++ | Parrot%20Virtual%20Machine%20Workshop%202009 | 19:16 | |
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/Parrot...ction=diff | |||
| shorten | dalek's url is at xrl.us/beqqej | ||
| Coke | particle-: I made it more true. :( | 19:17 | |
| hurm. the 1.1 roadmap query is showing #236, which is now on 1.4 milestone. | 19:35 | ||
| That's... wrong. wonder if it's my cache... | |||
| nopaste | "tene" at 97.117.72.236 pasted "working HLL P6Object for jonathan++" (21 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/16424 | 19:39 | |
| dalek | rrot: r38391 | pmichaud++ | trunk/DEPRECATED.pod: Close out TT #168 (stringification of protoobjects) in DEPRECATED.pod . |
19:40 | |
| nopaste | "tene" at 97.117.72.236 pasted "parrot trace for jonathan++" (6 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/16425 | 19:42 | |
| jhorwitz | Tene: what's your mod_perl6 problem? | 19:44 | |
| Coke | perl6: is there a way to do "${_}literal" ? | 20:03 | |
| pmichaud | Coke: {$_}literal | 20:04 | |
| Coke | danke. | 20:05 | |
| cotto | pmichaud, do you have any recommendations for optimizing a grammar? | 20:06 | |
| Coke | cotto: first, profile it! =-) | ||
| cotto | Coke, no. First, write a profiler. | ||
| ;) | |||
| pmichaud | cotto: I'd have to see a few more grammars. Try to structure it to avoid false leads as much as possible | 20:07 | |
| Coke | step one: learn c. | ||
| Tene | jhorwitz: segfault on load | ||
| iirc | 20:08 | ||
| erm, on loadimmediate | |||
| jhorwitz | Tene: after the latest fix? | ||
| Tene | jhorwitz: yes, still there | ||
| lessee if I can get a bt for you | |||
| jhorwitz is filled with segfault rage | |||
| Tene | also, perl6.pir should probably load_language 'perl6' | ||
| instead of load_bytecode on a path | 20:09 | ||
| jhorwitz | good catch -- the code hasn't been touched since load_language appeared. | ||
| Tene | BUT, there are issues with search paths for the libraries that rakudo tries to load, iirc | 20:10 | |
| jhorwitz | Parrot*Path and PERL6LIB should take care or that. | 20:11 | |
| s/or/of | |||
|
20:12
barney joined
|
|||
| Tene | yeah | 20:13 | |
| I remember seeing something weird happen with it anyway | 20:14 | ||
| jhorwitz: I lied. It's "Can't find Perl6MultiSub", which I think is a Parrot*Path issue. | 20:25 | ||
| jhorwitz | yeah, make sure your dynpath is right | ||
| Tene | will check later | 20:28 | |
| supposed to be working right now. ;) | 20:29 | ||
| jhorwitz | i saw nothing.... | ||
| dalek | tracwiki: v149 | allison++ | ParrotRoadmap | 20:40 | |
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/Parrot...ction=diff | |||
| shorten | dalek's url is at xrl.us/beqqu5 | ||
| Coke | pmichaud: is PGE LTM a roadmap item, or just a big todo? | 20:47 | |
| pmichaud | we had it on the roadmap because I somewhat think it may affect how language authors write their grammars. | 20:48 | |
| also, I thought I'd be farther along on it by now. | |||
| it wouldn't bother me to take it off the roadmap and just leave it as todo | 20:49 | ||
| (it'll get done in the same amount of time either way) | |||
| Coke | what about protoregex. same thing? | ||
| pmichaud | yes. | ||
| Coke | ok. | 20:50 | |
| dalek | tracwiki: v150 | coke++ | ParrotRoadmap | ||
| Tene | I think they'll both help cardinal's grammar quite a bit | ||
| dalek | tracwiki: add link to existing rt | ||
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/Parrot...ction=diff | |||
| shorten | dalek's url is at xrl.us/beqqwz | ||
| pmichaud | oh, they'll help all the grammars quite a bit. | ||
| They'll help my bank account, too. | |||
| Tene | :) | ||
| pmichaud | so, there is more than the usual incentive to complete them in a timely manner :-) | ||
| dalek | tracwiki: v151 | coke++ | ParrotRoadmap | 20:53 | |
| tracwiki: these were more "big todo" rather than roadmap-y. | |||
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/Parrot...ction=diff | |||
| shorten | dalek's url is at xrl.us/beqqxd | ||
| allison | Oh, I just created trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/589, should I delete it? | 20:58 | |
| (for PGE LTM) | |||
| Coke | allison: already fixed. | 20:59 | |
| I split that ticket into 2, and referenced the RT ticket for the one that had one. | 21:00 | ||
| nopaste | "tene" at 97.117.72.236 pasted "rakudo trace for jonathan++" (6 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/16426 | ||
| allison | Coke: thanks! | 21:01 | |
| Coke | anyone have openbsd? | 21:02 | |
| hurm. nevermind, ticket's very old. | |||
| nopaste | "jonathan" at 85.216.157.73 pasted "Tene - even something this simple fails for me" (9 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/16428 | 21:10 | |
| dalek | tracwiki: v67 | allison++ | WikiStart | 21:21 | |
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/WikiSt...ction=diff | |||
| shorten | dalek's url is at xrl.us/beqq3w | ||
|
21:44
Whiteknight joined
|
|||
| chromatic | Prediction: Rakudo passes 15k tests before #19. | 21:45 | |
| Whiteknight seconds that prediction | 21:46 | ||
| particle- | 3mo? | 21:49 | |
| somebody better start writing some tests. | |||
| Infinoid | Is a PIR "select" op (or method or whatever) on the roadmap? | 21:51 | |
| allison | selecting what? | ||
| Infinoid | non-blocking I/O. | ||
| pir and rakudo have sockets now, but I'm not a big fan of writing network code without some form of select or poll | |||
| allison | Infinoid: it's not in the PDD | 21:52 | |
| also not in the existing API | |||
| Infinoid | Is there something I can do to help solve that? | 21:53 | |
| Or is there another suggestion on how to write servers with lots of connections? | |||
| allison | write a patch, first to the PDD, and then once the group has had a chance to look it over, to the C API or PMC | ||
| everything for Sockets is methods on the Socket PMC, rather than opcodes | 21:54 | ||
| particle- | if the patch includes tests, all the better :) | ||
| Infinoid | what's your opinion of a Select PMC along the same lines? | 21:57 | |
| Whiteknight | what would the Select PMC do? | 21:58 | |
| PerlJam | Whiteknight: work for all IO and not just sockets? :) | 21:59 | |
| Whiteknight | oh, so like a multiplexer? | 22:00 | |
| i get it now | |||
| Infinoid | rather, it would be the PIR equivalent of an IO::Select object | ||
| Whiteknight | basically a thin opaque wrapper around another IO object? | 22:01 | |
| Infinoid | no, it's a List of IO objects | ||
| you add a bunch of IO objects to a Select object and call select() on it, it will tell you which ones have data for you to read(), which ones have exceptions that need to be dealt with, and so forht. | 22:02 | ||
| forth | |||
| Whiteknight | ah, okay. much clearer | ||
| Infinoid | this lets you implement IRC servers and web servers (http 1.1 keepalive) and imap servers and such, with lots of idle clients and the occasional piece of data coming in | ||
| the default blocking I/O means read() won't return until it has actually gotten some data. You can't implement a server with blocking I/O, because you can't predict which IO handle to read from next. | 22:03 | ||
| rather, read() won't return until it has filled the buffer (you pass the size as an argument), which makes things even less predictable. | 22:04 | ||
| Whiteknight | well we need to put together a proper asynchronous IO system anyway, a Select PMC won't negate that need | ||
| Infinoid | by asynchronous IO, do you mean AIO-style callbacks? | ||
| Whiteknight | yes | 22:05 | |
| Infinoid | That sounds awesome too. Completely different API tho | ||
|
22:14
bacek_ joined
|
|||
| Infinoid | allison: (re TT #593) Is there a single "recommended" way to wrap a library? It seems like there's a lot of variety in how postgres, opengl, pcre, etc are wrapped | 22:15 | |
| chromatic | Those guidelines have yet to evolve. | 22:16 | |
| allison | aye, part of developing the seed libraries is figuring out what works well and what doesn't | 22:18 | |
| async I/O is on the roadmap (in the PDD too) | |||
| Whiteknight | I'm thinking the time is getting ripe to start laying groundwork for asynch IO soon. | 22:19 | |
| it might be worthwhile coming up with a good step-by-step plan to make that happen | |||
| allison | Whiteknight: go for it. It's on the roadmap for 2.0 (next January), but there's no reason it couldn't be prototyped much earlier | 22:21 | |
| Infinoid | detecting AIO support on the host system would probably be a good start. do we plan to emulate it where it isn't available? | ||
| Whiteknight | Infinoid: That's probably preferrable in terms of performance, but in terms of development effort is probably the most expensive | 22:22 | |
| But putting good configure probes in place now would be a good first step that wouldn't break anything else | |||
| bacek_ | good morning | ||
| Infinoid | yeah | 22:23 | |
| hi bacek_ | |||
| Whiteknight | hello bacek | ||
| Infinoid | I imagine emulating it would probably be pretty simple... it would still be IO, just not A | ||
| but it can come later | |||
| are there any non-POSIX AIOs out there? I've only used it on linux. | 22:24 | ||
| allison | Hmmm... (trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/601) we already have pluggable runloops, so if anyone remembers why we added this item to the roadmap for 2.0, please annotate | ||
| AIO probably isn't sufficient for our needs | 22:25 | ||
| that is, async I/O on Parrot needs to fully integrate with the Parrot event system | 22:26 | ||
| Whiteknight | that's definitely the way I was planning to go about it | ||
| Infinoid can imagine emulating AIO on top of select()... and can also imagine emulating select() on top of AIO | 22:27 | ||
| Whiteknight: Interesting project. Once I've read the PDD, I'll get back to you if I have some spare cycles for it | |||
| Whiteknight | There are lots of cool projects that just appeared in trac | 22:28 | |
| and apparently I'm in the hole for garbage-collectable contexts | 22:29 | ||
| I'm going to have a few questions about that coming up soon, I'm sure | |||
|
22:29
kid51 joined
|
|||
| allison | Whiteknight: your name was on the Roadmap wiki page, feel free to unown the ticket | 22:29 | |
| Infinoid | ooh, GCable contexts | ||
| Whiteknight | no, I'm happy to have it | ||
| Infinoid tried and failed to do that once. | |||
| Whiteknight | I had a toy prototype of a Context PMC floating around on my machine somewhere | 22:30 | |
| allison | there's another ticket for that one lying around, with a partial conversion to a Context PMC | ||
| particle- | whiteknight: youd'd better anchor it somewhere | ||
| allison | worth looking for it, I think it's in RT | ||
| chromatic | Does that depend on the calling conventions refactor? | 22:32 | |
| allison | it can happen independently, but will be much simpler after the calling conventions refactor | 22:33 | |
| Infinoid | RT #60564 | ||
| chromatic | Hm, pluggable runloops is pretty darn easy. | ||
| allison | well, we already have them | ||
| chromatic | A little refactoring of src/runcore/ would make them trivial. | ||
| Whiteknight | is that like asking for "dynrunloop" libraries that could be loaded at runtime? | ||
| allison | chromatic: I'm not sure what we intended to add, do you remember? | 22:34 | |
| chromatic | ... except for the difficult part of allowing users to select them. | ||
| Whiteknight | yeah, that's the part that sounds the hardest | ||
| allison | chromatic: select them at runtime? | ||
| chromatic | I thought it was dynrunloops. | ||
| ./parrot --runcore=foo bar.pbc | |||
| allison | that sounds right, I'll add a note to the ticket | 22:35 | |
| Whiteknight | chromatic and allison: Did either of you two see RT # 38432 | ||
| ? | |||
| chromatic | I saw it but had no particular insight. | 22:36 | |
| cotto | quick clarification: When a deprecation has a milestone listed, is that milestone the first release *after* which the deprecation can happen? | ||
| Whiteknight | chromatic: I'm thinking that so long as we are refactoring the runloops and the calling conventions, we could just solve this problem one way or the other | 22:37 | |
| cotto | i.e. "eligible in 1.1" => milestone 1.0 ? | ||
| allison | cotto: yes, eligible in 1.1 means the feature might not exist in the 1.1 release | ||
| chromatic | The constructor exception problem or some other problem? | ||
| cotto | allison, so the milestone should be 1.0? | 22:38 | |
| allison | chromatic: hmmm... actually, the runloop switch should be trivial, we're already doing it on the fly at runtime after Parrot has started | ||
| cotto: the milestone should be 1.1 | |||
| cotto | got it | 22:39 | |
| allison | cotto: it's work that we're doing to prepare for the 1.1 release | ||
| chromatic | Switching runloops compiled into libparrot is trivial. Loading dynrunloops has other implications for installability, discoverability, enumerability, and security. | 22:40 | |
| allison | chromatic: ooof, I don't know that runloops as dynexts will ever work | 22:41 | |
| chromatic: but it's worth prototyping | |||
| chromatic: it has some implications too. Could GC modules be dynexts? | 22:42 | ||
| chromatic | Making them work is trivial. Loading them isn't entirely trivial. | ||
| allison | chromatic: could large portions of the current "core" be dynexts? | ||
| chromatic | I suppose parrot_config could include information about dynruncores. | ||
| I don't know about the rest of the core. Ops, perhaps, if the L1 scheme works out. | 22:43 | ||
| allison | chromatic: I/O for example? | ||
| well, ops can already be dynexts | |||
| chromatic | I meant "every op library we have now". | ||
| I suppose IO *could* be a dynext, but I don't see an easy way to do it like we have for runloops. | 22:44 | ||
| allison | many of them already could be now (there's a deprecation item for that) | ||
| chromatic | A runloop only has a few characteristics. It's easy to model that in a way which allows registry/unregistry. | ||
| allison | the I/O system is already designed to be swapped out for different architectures | 22:46 | |
| nopaste | "jonathan" at 85.216.157.73 pasted "tene - this one works" (16 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/16430 | ||
| allison | currently it's swapped at compile time, and each variant defines a set of standard macros | ||
| it's a fixed set of functions each variant provides | 22:47 | ||
| could just as well be a .so that provides a set of C functions | |||
| chromatic | I suppose if the macros turned into invocations of function pointers registered in a struct or somehow, that's workable. | ||
| allison | but then, I/O dynexts may not gain us anything, in terms of speed or extensibility | 22:48 | |
| chromatic | Not as much as runloops. | 22:49 | |
|
22:50
tetragon joined
|
|||
| allison | I'm bumping "ordered destruction" out to 3.6, any objections? | 22:53 | |
| chromatic | I think people will want it before then, but no idea how to make it happen intelligently. | ||
| It depends on saner GC as well -- our constant pools are... complex. | 22:54 | ||
| allison | indeed, I think it will be more possible after the GC tasks in 3.0 | ||
| moderator | Parrot 1.1.0 Released | parrot.org/ | 325 RTs left | Weekly Priority: Remove Deprecated Items | 22:57 | |
| Whiteknight | parrot-users++ | 23:00 | |
| great idea for a new list | |||
|
23:09
Woody4286 joined
|
|||
| Whiteknight | allison: I have some questions about GCable contexts, if you've time | 23:14 | |
| allison | Whiteknight: sure, question away | 23:16 | |
|
23:16
clunker3 joined
|
|||
| Whiteknight | 1) Is it worthwhile to maintain a distinction between Interp_Context and Parrot_Context structures? | 23:17 | |
| I never found any use for the former except as a small overlay for the latter | |||
| allison | aye, they should be merged into one PMC | ||
| Whiteknight | okay, thanks | 23:18 | |
| 2) We do want this to be a PMC, and not just a "regular" structure that's PObj-isomorphic? | |||
| like a stack chunk or a STRING? | 23:19 | ||
| I ask because contexts are pretty complex, and the VTABLE interface is pretty limiting | |||
| we would end up needing to do a lot of direct ATTR accesses, which ruins encapsulation | 23:20 | ||
| allison | Ideally, a PMC | ||
| Whiteknight | ok | ||
| chromatic | What does making it a PMC provide? | ||
| allison | really ideally, the same PMC as the return continuation | ||
| Whiteknight | allison: Ah, that's something I hadn't even considered | ||
| allison | really really ideally, we collapse the context, the return continuation, and the "state" for an executing sub/method | 23:21 | |
| also collapse the call signature object | |||
| Whiteknight | okay, lots of possibilities that I hadn't even considered | ||
| allison | chromatic: PMCs are a standard, GC able structure | 23:22 | |
| Whiteknight | collapsing in the call signature object is going to produce lots of good opportunities for simplification and optimization | ||
| allison | Whiteknight: aye | ||
| collapsing all of them vastly reduces the amount of allocation we have to do for each call | 23:23 | ||
| chromatic: we could create another unique GC-able structure, but there isn't much benefit to it (PMCs are already pretty generic) | |||
| Whiteknight is awash in all the possibilities | |||
| allison | chromatic: we do probably need a GC flag for "short-lived" PMCs, but we probably need that even if contexts aren't PMCs, so implement it once for all | 23:25 | |
| chromatic | Collapsing everything into one structure seems reasonable to me. | 23:27 | |
| I don't buy the "PMCs are GCable, so everything GCable must be a PMC" argument. | |||
| But collapsing everything into one structure makes sense. | |||
| Whiteknight | One thing I would like to do eventually is to get all the PMC_data structures allocated from the fixed-sized pools, instead of calling malloc for each one | 23:33 | |
| because if we're malloc'ing data for every PMC allocation, we're not gaining any of the performance benefits of managing our own pools anyway | |||
| allison | chromatic: and I don't see much point in adding a completely different structure and making it GC-able, but I'm happy to explore both paths | 23:34 | |
| Whiteknight: that's certainly possible | |||
| chromatic | If we never take advantage of the PMC parts, there's no advantage to it being a PMC. | 23:38 | |
| Whiteknight | chromatic: I think we will take advantage of some PMC parts. | 23:47 | |
| pushing in arguments, and accessing them again using keyed lookups will be a very good feature | 23:48 | ||
| allison | We certainly do take advantage of the PMC parts for call signatures | ||
| chromatic | The combined version, yes. | ||
| allison | and, if those are the only PMC features we use in the combined PMC, it's still valuable | 23:49 | |
|
23:50
starc joined
|
|||
| bacek_ | quick question: are stuff eligible to remove in 1.4 can be removed in 1.2? | 23:50 | |
| Whiteknight | the new concurrency-friendly cps system is very intriguing to me | 23:51 | |