|
#parrot Parrot 2.2.0 "Like Clockwork" Released! | parrot.org/ | Channel log: irclog.perlgeek.de/parrot/today | Improve Rakudo rx and buildtime performance | Fix HLL bugs (TT #389, #1040) | Prioritize Rakudo Needs and roadmap items Set by moderator on 30 March 2010. |
|||
| Whiteknight | are you sure about that? Have an example? | 00:00 | |
| arnsholt | Well, my point of departure is the bug you spotted, with the missing .return when I removed .tailcall | ||
| Lemme see if I can find the nopaste | 00:01 | ||
| Coke | the problem is that the HLL of the grammar is not the HLL of my language. | ||
| Austin | That's what I meant about checking for some kind of boundary... | 00:02 | |
| arnsholt | Whiteknight: nopaste.snit.ch/20025 | 00:03 | |
| Whiteknight | arnsholt, so what's wrong in this example? | 00:04 | |
| arnsholt | If you remove the .tailcall directive without making it .return explicitly (like I had done), city in blob() will hold the string "la" after the continuations are invoked | ||
| Whiteknight | oh, ok | 00:05 | |
| arnsholt | But when the first continuation is created at least, it shouldn't have that value | ||
| Which is what makes me wonder | |||
| Whiteknight | in that case, it pulls the return value out of interp->current_sig, which hasn't been overwritten because there was no .return | ||
| so yes, it probably is a bug | 00:06 | ||
| nopaste | "coke" at 72.228.52.192 pasted "austin - this fails" (40 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/20142 | ||
| Whiteknight | more realistically, it should throw an exception because a result is requested, but nothing is returned | ||
|
00:06
tcurtis joined
|
|||
| arnsholt | True, true | 00:07 | |
| Whiteknight | make a ticket, can post this IRC chat as a description | ||
| Austin | Coke: Try assign_vpp | ||
| arnsholt | I'll do that | ||
|
00:09
snarkyboojum joined
|
|||
| Coke | getlist not found for undef. | 00:10 | |
| Austin | Heh. What does that mean? | ||
| Coke | that is putting an Undef into the list. | 00:11 | |
| Austin | Yeah. | ||
|
00:12
eternaleye joined
|
|||
| Austin | Are you still using the lset-a-1-aa example as a test case? | 00:12 | |
| Coke | yup. | ||
| Austin | And what's the expected output? | ||
| purl | the expected output is very long, so i scrolls for screens and screens | ||
| Austin | Because I get no output, and $? == 0 | 00:13 | |
| Coke | A AA | ||
| er, a AA | |||
| Austin | Really? | ||
| it should print something? | |||
| Coke | er... if you add a puts, yes! =-) | 00:14 | |
| ./partcl -e 'set a {a {b c}}; puts [lset a 1 AA]' | |||
| Austin | Now I get a blank line | 00:15 | |
| Coke | what's your diff/ | ||
| ? | |||
| arnsholt | Oh. FFS. Just for good measure, I made Parrot segfault as well | 00:16 | |
| nopaste | "Austin" at 68.37.47.32 pasted "list method" (10 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/20143 | 00:17 | |
| Austin | Hmm... | 00:18 | |
| My version of "lset" is perhaps a tad minimal... | |||
| Coke | @list.push: $element; ? | ||
| arnsholt | At least the segfault was my fault (no pun intended) | ||
| Coke | Austin: have you pulled? | ||
| Austin | Nope | ||
| Coke | you'll need to do that. =-) | ||
| Whiteknight | segfault? | ||
| purl | well don't DO that, then. | ||
| arnsholt | But segfaulting when invoking an uninitialised continuation is probably a bit over the top | 00:19 | |
| Whiteknight | definitely not right | ||
| file another ticket! | |||
| arnsholt | Whiteknight: I removed a line too much and killed the one that inited a continuation | ||
| Whiteknight | in C? | ||
| purl | in C is there some rational choice between for (;;){...} and while(1){...}? | ||
| arnsholt | Yeah. I just have to obsess a bit more over how to word this first one =) | ||
| No, PIR | |||
| Austin | partcl-nqp? | ||
| purl | well, partcl-nqp is github.com/partcl/partcl-nqp | ||
| Austin | botsnack | ||
| purl | :) | ||
| Coke | Austin: with your patch, I get the same thing I get with my patch. | 00:20 | |
| you probably aren't triggering the error because it's invoked from inside [lset] | |||
| Austin | Right. | ||
|
00:23
ruoso joined
|
|||
| arnsholt | Whiteknight: Oh dang. Our conversation overflowed the day change in the IRC logs =) | 00:24 | |
|
00:25
payload joined
|
|||
| Whiteknight | nice | 00:26 | |
| arnsholt: I know it must be frustrating for you, but you're performing an invaluable bug-finding service for Parrot | 00:27 | ||
| arnsholt++ | |||
| arnsholt | Well, this one isn't an actual issue for me (thankfully) | ||
| There was just something that didn't quite sit right | |||
| tcurtis | Is there any sort of standard benchmark suite I could use to make sure a change doesn't make Parrot excessively slow? "time make fulltest"(my current plan) is probably not the best way to do so. | 00:28 | |
| Whiteknight | tcurtis: yes, there are benchmarks | 00:30 | |
| let me look | |||
| arnsholt | Whiteknight: Do you know off-hand what the correct C incantations are to cause Parrot to die() | 00:31 | |
| Whiteknight | examples/benchmarks/*.pir | ||
| arnsholt: in C? I think it's Parrot_exit() | |||
| arnsholt: src/exit.c | |||
| cotto_work | tcurtis, dukeleto had something set up that should make finding performance regressions relatively simple | ||
| Austin | tcurtis: svn ci -m "here's a change" ; kold=$(echo "karma tcurtis" | wirc irc.parrot.org/parrot) ; sleep $((24 * 3600)) ; knew=$(echo "karma $USER | wirc irc.parrot.org/parrot) ; if expr "$knew < $kold" ; echo "Bad change" ; fi | 00:32 | |
| cotto_work | actually, ripping off speed.pypy.org wouldn't be a bad gsoc project if it's not too easy | ||
| Austin | The bacek approach: Check it in, wait 24 hours, check your karma... | 00:33 | |
| cotto_work | chromatic usually runs some small-ish nqp program under valgrind and uses the instruction count as an indicator | 00:34 | |
| Whiteknight | that's good too. But in talking about changes to the internals, the opcount can stay the same but the cost per op can change | 00:35 | |
| tcurtis | I think I'll try just using "make benchmark_tests", which I only now noticed. | ||
| Austin | Whiteknight: I think he meant the host CPU opcode count. | ||
| cotto_work | yeah | 00:36 | |
| Austin | (valgrind) | ||
| Whiteknight | oh. Duh. | ||
| I might be stupid, but there's one thing I am not: stupid | |||
| dalek | TT #1537 created by arnsholt++: Continuations fail to revert all registers to the correct state | 00:37 | |
| TT #1537: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1537 | |||
| Whiteknight | okay, I'm off to bed | 00:42 | |
| actually, Lost is on in a few minutes, then bed | |||
| later | |||
| cotto_work | night | ||
| Coke | Lost? no spoilers, I just finished season 1. | 00:47 | |
| ... every time I see arnsholt, I think "you got some artz on you." | 00:48 | ||
| arnsholt | artz? | ||
| Coke | lostpedia.wikia.com/wiki/Leslie_Arzt | ||
| I know it's not the same name. Just some sort of mental trigger. | 00:49 | ||
| arnsholt | Right. Never watched Lost, so no wonder I didn't get the reference | 00:50 | |
| At any rate, it's a bit of a portmanteau on my real name | |||
| Coke | Austin: ah. I think my undef error is because I'm getting further. whee. | 00:53 | |
| arnsholt | There, another issue opened. It even has a patch =) | ||
| Austin | COngrats. | ||
| dalek | TT #1538 created by arnsholt++: Invoking uninitialised continuation causes segfault | 00:54 | |
| TT #1538: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1538 | |||
| Coke | *cry* | 01:01 | |
|
01:02
bubaflub joined
01:04
atrodo joined
01:07
bubaflub joined
01:09
bacek joined
|
|||
| dalek | rtcl-nqp: c09f71c | Austin_Hastings++ | src/Tcl (2 files): Added Data::Dumper support for TclString, List |
01:13 | |
| cotto | good evening | 01:16 | |
| purl | Ah, evening. The tumultuous mind tarries and contemplates, reveling in the silence afforded by the diurnal proletariat. Good evening, indeed. | ||
| cotto | go away, purl | 01:17 | |
| purl | No, YOU go away, bud. | ||
| Austin | smackdown | ||
| purl | somebody said smackdown was the only one of those i've ever even heard anyone mention. | ||
| Austin | purl++ | ||
| dalek | rtcl-nqp: 3152687 | Coke++ | src/Partcl/commands/main.pm: use a more natural for-style loop. |
01:19 | |
| rtcl-nqp: a7900e9 | Coke++ | src/Tcl (2 files): Merge branch 'master' of github.com:partcl/partcl-nqp |
|||
| Austin | Man, the next time Whiteknight bitches about subscripting in NQP, I'm doing to send him to the lset manual page. | 01:21 | |
| Coke | Austin: =-) | 01:28 | |
| tcl is soo much fun. =-) | |||
| Austin | Coke: I got up to 10 (out of range) working | 01:44 | |
|
01:53
kid51 joined
01:55
Psyche^ joined,
eternaleye joined
|
|||
| Austin | Hey, coke: does this commit of yours work? | 01:56 | |
| Coke | Austin: out of range? | 01:59 | |
| purl | well, out of range is good | ||
| Austin | yeah, test #10 | ||
| I got 'em all, now. | |||
| had em all. | 02:00 | ||
| git-- | |||
| Coke | Austin++ | 02:02 | |
| nopaste | "coke" at 72.228.52.192 pasted "this is close, but occasionally gets assign $PXX, <void>" (26 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/20144 | 02:03 | |
| Austin | Coke: is it really an error to lset a non-existent var? Or does that just vivify one? | 02:11 | |
|
02:12
jimk joined
|
|||
| Coke | error. | 02:13 | |
| (at least with the vintage tclsh I have lying about.) | |||
| Austin | wfm | 02:14 | |
| Code just gets a little uglier. | |||
| Coke | working trumps ugly. | ||
| lset should already be dying on that, btw. | |||
| Austin | Code just gets a little uglier. | 02:15 | |
| ww | |||
| Okay | |||
| This should be the last change... | |||
| Get rid of the dumps.. | |||
| Hey, in case you didn't see it, I added __dump methods to TclString and TclList so that Data::Dumper would print more than just { ... } | 02:16 | ||
|
02:16
Mokurai1 joined
|
|||
| Austin | That got old quick. | 02:16 | |
| Coke | I did. Austin++ | ||
| Austin | Pushing | 02:17 | |
| push it | |||
| dalek | kudo: 8ba6030 | (Solomon Foster)++ | src/core/ (2 files): Int and Num do Real. jnthn++ for patching it so this works with augument. |
||
| Coke | push it is <reply>Push it real good. | ||
| Austin | push it is <reply>Push it real good! | ||
| Heh. | |||
| great minds.. | |||
| purl | you wish you thought like me, dude | ||
| Austin | push it | ||
| push it? | |||
| purl | Oh! | ||
| Austin | bah | ||
| Anyway, it's pushed | 02:18 | ||
| nopaste | "coke" at 72.228.52.192 pasted "austion - close..." (26 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/20145 | 02:20 | |
| dalek | rtcl-nqp: 458f2f6 | Austin_Hastings++ | src/Partcl/ (2 files): Got lset working |
02:22 | |
| rtcl-nqp: 4335646 | Austin_Hastings++ | src/Partcl/commands/main.pm: Got lset working (again). Undid some cleanups that actually changed behavior. |
|||
| Coke | untodo'd the tests... | 02:23 | |
|
02:25
snarkyboojum joined
|
|||
| Coke | Austin: we are now failing t/sanity.t | 02:25 | |
| Austin | ? | 02:26 | |
| Coke | 'make test' has failures. | ||
| dalek | rtcl-nqp: 39af750 | Coke++ | t/cmd_lset.t: These tests pass now (Austin++) |
02:27 | |
| Austin | okay, back | 02:28 | |
| What sort of failures? | |||
| I've been seeing this weird "unexpected \\n" but I figured it was a unix/dos thing. | |||
| Coke | no, that's a real failure in the generated PIR. | 02:32 | |
| if you run parrot -D60 partcl.pbc <some file>, you can capture the generated EVAL files and see the bad PIR. | 02:33 | ||
| ./partcl t/sanity.t shows the erorr. | 02:34 | ||
| Austin | Damn. | ||
| Coke++ | |||
| I *never* knew about that, but I wish I had.. | |||
|
02:34
tcurtis joined
02:35
janus joined
|
|||
| Coke | it's helpful. =-) | 02:36 | |
| Austin | assign weirdness in "is" | ||
| Coke | sanity.t is showing a different error. | 02:37 | |
| Austin | Where's that defined? | ||
| Coke | lib/test_more.tcl | ||
| it's in tcl. | 02:40 | ||
|
02:41
atrodo joined
|
|||
| Austin | Yeah, it's trying to assign a default value to an unspecified parameter. | 02:41 | |
| Why is it being evaled, though? | |||
| Coke | why is what being eval'd. is? | 02:42 | |
| Austin | Yeah | ||
| Coke | because It's being compiled? | ||
| source "lib/test_more.tcl" reads in the tcl, compiles it to PIR, then compiles the PIR. | |||
| Austin | Okay. | 02:43 | |
| Coke | I wonder if it's the list {special {}} | ||
| Austin | It's description | ||
| Coke | (the second, empty element looks suspicious.) | ||
| given that you just changed list processing. | |||
| Austin | Wait | ||
| No | |||
| Coke | (or {description ""} | ||
| Austin | It's special | ||
| tcurtis | I think I've gotten rid of the last uses of Parrot_string_cstring without breaking anything, although it might have a small performance penalty since Parrot_str_to_cstring copies, while Parrot_string_cstring doesn't. | ||
| Coke | "" and {} are the same thing. | ||
| Austin | Heh | 02:44 | |
| Coke | (well, after past) | ||
| Austin | Except one of them is a list, right? | ||
| Now, it's a blocked_something-or-other | |||
| Coke | no, they're both strings. =-) | ||
| things aren't lists unless you treat them like lists. | 02:45 | ||
| so, /proc/ will take those and treat them like lists. | |||
| but the tcl compiler will pass them as strings to the proc command. | |||
| Austin | But doesn't the parser handle "" and {} differently? | ||
| Coke | (unless pmichaud did something odd.) | ||
| "" is like qq{}, {} is like q[} | |||
| q{} | |||
| so, yes, the parser does different things, but when the parser is done, that's still a string. | 02:47 | ||
| if you look at the Grammar, you'll see that list is self contained - nothing else refers to it. | |||
| (that's why we have .getList() all over the place, to coerce the strings.) | 02:48 | ||
| Austin | Heh | 02:50 | |
| Not as independent as you think... | |||
| Coke | it's tangled. | 02:51 | |
| ugh. feel crappy. later. | |||
| -> | |||
| dalek | TT #1539 created by tcurtis++: Remove deprecated Parrot_string_cstring function | 02:53 | |
| TT #1539: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1539 | |||
|
02:54
Patterner joined
02:56
Mokurai1 joined
03:11
hercynium joined
03:36
Coke joined
|
|||
| cotto | Is anyone else seeing a t/compilers/imcc/syn/regressions.t failure? | 03:51 | |
| dalek | rrot: r45333 | bacek++ | branches/avl_string_cache: Branch to implement constant string caching described on FixingConstantSTRINGCaching wikipage |
||
| bubaflub | cotto: i reopened a ticket about that earlier | 03:56 | |
| l | |||
| lemme fin dit | |||
| *find it | |||
| cotto: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/641#comment:4 | |||
| cotto | Good for you. bubaflub++. Is that the first revision where that test fails? | 04:00 | |
| bubaflub | first that i noticed | 04:02 | |
| it can't be too many revisions before that; i usually build pretty regularly | |||
| an | |||
|
04:02
eternaleye joined
|
|||
| bubaflub | d it may just be my compiler doesn't like it | 04:02 | |
| bacek | I can reproduce it on Linux/i386/g++ | 04:03 | |
| not on gcc. | |||
| bubaflub | Coke mentioned that as well | ||
| though i'm on Mac OS X and gcc | |||
| cotto | It is helpful if you can bisect when posting a bug though | 04:05 | |
| bubaflub | cotto: i've got some time, a svn and git-svn checkout. what should i do? | 04:06 | |
| should i check out the revision that Coke mentioned in the ticket and then start bisceting from there? | |||
| search.cpan.org/~infinoid/App-SVN-B...svn-bisect looks useful | 04:09 | ||
| cotto | That'd be a reasonable approach. | 04:14 | |
| bubaflub | cotto: i'll try to get to it tonight and update the ticket | 04:18 | |
| Austin | msg coke I've committed changes that appear to work - make test passes, t/cmd_lset.t passes. The problem with String vs. TclString is down in the PCT library, where it explicitly processes the type of the value given to PAST::Val nodes. To use TclString will require either setting "returns" parameters, or modifying the global type info hash. (Then there will be a different bug, natch...) | 04:21 | |
| purl | Message for coke stored. | ||
| bubaflub | cotto: i just checked out and built the revision that Coke said he had it working in and it failed for me. i'm updating the ticket. | 04:26 | |
| Coke | bubaflub: 0.9 is old. | 04:39 | |
| bubaflub | Coke: whoops. first result in google. i'll make sure to grab the newest | ||
| Coke | Austin: don't forget to push. | ||
| bubaflub | Coke: I also have a patch for TT #1534 (removing the svk developer support) | ||
| it builds clean off trunk, make coretest doesn't report any extra failures | 04:40 | ||
| Coke: there is also a note in the description of tools/dev/mk_manifest_and_skip.pl about how it works with svk 1.08 - do you want me to remove that as well? | 04:42 | ||
|
04:45
eternaleye joined
|
|||
| dalek | rtcl-nqp: 7b351b9 | Austin_Hastings++ | src/Partcl/ (2 files): Fixed test failures introduced by lset mods. |
04:48 | |
| rtcl-nqp: 089e69c | Austin_Hastings++ | t/cmd_lset.t: Merge branch 'master' of github.com:partcl/partcl-nqp |
|||
| Coke | bubaflub: yup. | 04:54 | |
| bubaflub | Coke: k, it's on 45334. i've closed the ticket. | ||
|
04:54
janus joined
|
|||
| Coke | Austin++ # YAY | 04:55 | |
| bubaflub++ danke. | |||
| dalek | rrot: r45334 | bubaflub++ | trunk (3 files): [TT #1534] remove svk developer support |
04:57 | |
| cotto | Do we have a way for PIR code to get entropy? | 05:02 | |
| bacek scared... | |||
| cotto | you down with entropy? | 05:03 | |
| bacek | make coretest just passed after first successful compilation of AVL based constant string cache... | ||
| dalek | TT #1534 closed by bubaflub++: Remove svk developer support | 05:04 | |
| TT #1534: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1534 | |||
| cotto | nice | ||
| bacek | make test passed... | 05:05 | |
| cotto | doubly nice | ||
| bacek | I did miss something. It couldn't happen! | ||
| Holy shit. It really works! | 05:06 | ||
| cotto | It's nice using someone else's already-debugged code. | 05:07 | |
| bacek | We already reinvented quite few wheels. I think it enough. | 05:08 | |
| seen chromatic | 05:09 | ||
| purl | chromatic was last seen on #parrot 7 hours, 22 minutes and 15 seconds ago, saying: Given the source of the memory bug, I half expect that the design of this system included the line "The resulting must resemble a shark when printed on a 132-column line printer at midnight under a full moon." | ||
| dukeleto | wheels within wheels... | 05:11 | |
| purl | Wheels within wheels in a spiral array. A pattern so grand and complex. Time after time we lose sight of the way. Our causes can't see their effects. | ||
| dalek | rrot: r45335 | bacek++ | branches/avl_string_cache (2 files): Copy AVL tree implementation. |
05:13 | |
| rrot: r45336 | bacek++ | branches/avl_string_cache (2 files): Initial implemenation of string cache based on AVL tree |
|||
|
05:19
Mokurai1 joined
|
|||
| Coke | Austin: you still in? | 05:20 | |
| I ported over [lreplace] | 05:21 | ||
| dalek | rtcl-nqp: 2393e1a | Coke++ | (2 files): run t/cmd_list.t in 'make test', marking the few failures todo. |
05:22 | |
| rtcl-nqp: 8f342db | Coke++ | (2 files): Add [lreplace], based on partcl's PIR version but in NQP. |
|||
| bacek | msg chromatic to you have any benchmarks for "string cache"? | 05:46 | |
| purl | Message for chromatic stored. | ||
| dalek | rrot: r45337 | cotto++ | trunk/runtime/parrot/library/ProfTest/PIRProfile.nqp: [proftest] use more generic, if predictable, temp files |
05:48 | |
| rrot: r45338 | bacek++ | branches/avl_string_cache (3 files): Create function str_new_constant_ex (due lack of imagination for better name) to create new constant STRING with provided charset and encoding |
|||
| rrot: r45339 | bacek++ | branches/avl_string_cache/src/string/api.c: Finish string_node_compare implementation. |
|||
|
05:52
parthm joined
05:53
parthm left
|
|||
| cotto | What's p6regex for a 0-width negative assertion? | 05:53 | |
| or positive | 05:54 | ||
| bacek | cotto: <?before>? | 06:09 | |
|
06:11
uniejo joined
|
|||
| cotto | That kinda did what I wanted, but it's too late for me to be writing regexes. | 06:11 | |
| It's better to understand what I'm doing than to throw stuff at the compiler and see if it magically works. | 06:12 | ||
| night | 06:14 | ||
| happy avl tree hacking | |||
| bacek | good night, cotto | 06:16 | |
| msg chromatic AVL string cache is kinda done. Feel free to measure performance :) | 06:19 | ||
| purl | Message for chromatic stored. | ||
|
06:20
AndyA joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r45340 | bacek++ | branches/avl_string_cache/src/string/api.c: Use fixed size allocator for AVL nodes. |
06:21 | |
| rrot: r45341 | bacek++ | branches/avl_string_cache/src/packfile/pf_items.c: Fetch strings from PBC using new constant string cache. |
|||
|
06:46
plobsing joined
06:59
iblechbot joined
07:23
cotto joined
07:26
snarkyboojum left
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r45342 | bacek++ | branches/avl_string_cache (3 files): Made string_node_compare non-static |
07:27 | |
| rrot: r45343 | bacek++ | branches/avl_string_cache (2 files): Swap old const string hash with new AVL cache in interpeter |
|||
|
07:31
fperrad joined
07:37
riffraff joined
07:48
jjore joined
|
|||
| dalek | kudo: a33fc9f | moritz++ | t/spectest.data: two more passing test files |
07:49 | |
| sorear | Is there a defined protocol for /loading/ language support? | 08:06 | |
|
08:06
bacek joined
|
|||
| sorear | i.e. if pir::compreg__PS("tcl") fails, should I, say, pir::load_bytecode("tcl")? | 08:06 | |
| (hello bacek) | 08:08 | ||
| bacek | aloha sorear | ||
|
08:11
payload joined
|
|||
| dalek | kudo: a0fe385 | moritz++ | t/spectest.data: we pass undef.t |
08:14 | |
|
08:16
payload1 joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r45344 | bacek++ | branches/avl_string_cache/src/string/api.c: Always allocate new string constant from root interpreter. Fix crash when new constant allocated from thread-specific interpreter. |
08:18 | |
|
08:22
AndyA joined
08:26
snarkyboojum joined,
payload joined
08:28
eternaleye joined
08:34
cognominal joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r45345 | bacek++ | branches/avl_string_cache (2 files): Fix couple of codetest failures |
08:34 | |
|
09:01
eternaleye joined
09:10
riffraff joined
09:25
clinton joined
|
|||
| sorear | Do I currently have carte blanche to redesign PDD-31 as necessary for seamless P5-P6 integration? | 09:33 | |
| I'm not sure to what extent I'm the only one working on cross-language issues | |||
|
09:36
janus joined
09:44
bacek joined
09:51
payload joined
09:56
estrabd joined
|
|||
| sorear pokes Tene | 09:57 | ||
|
10:07
payload joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r45346 | mikehh++ | trunk/tools/dev/mk_manifest_and_skip.pl: fix codetest failure - trailing whitespace - copyright and shebang line |
10:45 | |
| rrot: r45347 | mikehh++ | trunk/src/pmc/complex.pmc: fix codetest failure - assert args and linelength - src/pmc/complex.pmc |
|||
| rrot: r45348 | mikehh++ | trunk/src/pmc/hashiterator.pmc: fix codetest failure - assert args - src/pmc/hashiterator.pmc |
11:01 | ||
| rrot: r45349 | mikehh++ | trunk/src/pmc/default.pmc: fix codetest failure - assert args - src/pmc/default.pmc |
|||
|
11:12
Coke joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r45350 | mikehh++ | trunk/src/pmc/bigint.pmc: fix codetest failure - assert args - src/pmc/bigint.pmc |
11:19 | |
| rrot: r45351 | mikehh++ | trunk/src/pmc/default.pmc: fix codetest failure - assert args - src/pmc/default.pmc |
|||
|
11:31
estrabd joined
11:37
cotto joined
11:41
estrabd_ joined
|
|||
| bacek | mikehh, ping | 11:45 | |
| msg mikehh if you have time can you test avl_string_cache branch? Something like amd64/g++ will be helpful | 11:47 | ||
| purl | Message for mikehh stored. | ||
| mikehh | bacek: ok will do | 11:49 | |
| bacek | mikehh, thanks | ||
|
11:50
iblechbot joined
|
|||
| bacek | Enough for today. | 11:51 | |
| See you tomorrow! | |||
| dalek | rrot: r45352 | bacek++ | branches/avl_string_cache/include/parrot/avl_tree.h: Reformat AVL tree code. |
11:52 | |
| rrot: r45353 | bacek++ | branches/avl_string_cache/include/parrot/avl_tree.h: Simplify and restyle AVL code. - Reindent according to Parrot codestyle. - Small optimization to avoid second call to compare() during lookups. |
|||
| rrot: r45354 | bacek++ | branches/avl_string_cache/config/gen/makefiles/root.in: Add avl_tree.h into string/api.c dependencies. |
|||
| rrot: r45355 | bacek++ | branches/avl_string_cache/include/parrot/avl_tree.h: More codestd restyling of AVL tree. |
|||
|
11:52
whiteknight joined
|
|||
|
11:53
bluescreen joined
|
|||
| mikehh | codetest failure - t/codingstd/pir_code_coda.t - for file t/profiling/profiling.t which is in fact nqp so the test is wrong | 11:54 | |
| all other tests PASS (pre/post-config, make corevm/make coretest, smoke (#32943), fulltest) at r45351 - Ubuntu 9.10 amd64 (g++ with --optimize) | |||
| mikehh just updated llvm - it's at r100001 | 12:04 | ||
|
12:17
ruoso joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | good morning #parrot | 12:30 | |
| arnsholt | Morning whiteknight | 12:36 | |
| whiteknight | hello arnsholt | 12:37 | |
| dalek | kudo: 872898d | (Solomon Foster)++ | src/core/ (6 files): Move all Real versions of .abs to Real.abs, remove "multi" from all .abs definitions. |
12:43 | |
| mikehh | bacek: looks good - some codetest failures with include/parrot/avl_tree.h - others fixed in trunk except the one reported above but other tests PASS | 12:45 | |
| bacek: pre/post-config, corevm/coretest, smoke (#32945) fulltest except as noted above | 12:48 | ||
|
12:54
lucian joined
|
|||
| mikehh | /msg bacek | 12:54 | |
| avl_string_cache branch: | |||
| some codetest failures with include/parrot/avl_tree.h (and distro_tests)) - others fixed in trunk | |||
| all other tests PASS (pre/post-config, make corevm/make coretest, smoke (#32945), fulltest) at r45355 - Ubuntu 9.10 amd64 (g++ with --optimize) | |||
| dammit | 12:56 | ||
| msg bacek - avl_string_cache branch: some codetest failures with include/parrot/avl_tree.h (and distro_tests)) - others fixed in trunk - otherwise all other tests PASS (pre/post-config, make corevm/make coretest, smoke (#32945), fulltest) at r45355 - Ubuntu 9.10 amd64 (g++ with --optimize) | |||
| purl | Message for bacek stored. | ||
|
13:04
tetragon joined,
eternaleye joined
13:10
GodFather joined
13:17
PerlJam joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | the only part I dislike about the GSoC program is the infuriating mailing list | 13:23 | |
| moritz | whiteknight: you don't have to read that | 13:24 | |
| whiteknight: luckily it's enough if the program admins read it | |||
| whiteknight | I try not to anymore, but it still comes to my inbox | ||
| Coke | whiteknight: I tend to mute any of the long running conversations. | 13:25 | |
| whiteknight | I'm going to tell gmail to redirect all those emails to the damn trash | ||
| Coke | like "HI MY NAME IS WILL AND I'm HAPPY TO BE A MENTOR THIS YEAR. WHO ARE YOU!?" | ||
| perhaps I'm too antisocial. | |||
| whiteknight | or the ones I'm getting this morning "How to be student? Thanks! | ||
| Coke | I don't mind people asking questions. I mind the jerks who pile on. | 13:28 | |
| you can answer the question and redirect. Don't just say "google it, jerkface." | |||
| whiteknight | it takes a certain ignorance of mailing lists to spam everybody with questions that blatantly don't belong | ||
|
13:29
atrodo joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | ...and to spam the same absurd questions to the list several times | 13:30 | |
|
13:39
khairul joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r45356 | mikehh++ | branches/avl_string_cache/include/parrot/avl_tree.h: parrot copyright and Id and svn properties |
13:47 | |
| rrot: r45357 | mikehh++ | branches/avl_string_cache/t/codingstd/copyright.t: add permitted duplicate copyright for include/parrot/avl_tree.h |
13:48 | ||
|
14:26
Andy joined
14:28
bubaflub joined
|
|||
| Coke | I'm looking at the GSOC proposal for the instrumentation; how is this output different from ... hey. where did 'parrot -p' go? | 14:34 | |
| (and why is it still listed as an option if it's been removed.) | 14:35 | ||
| cotto, was that you? | |||
| Coke wonders how to google for the literal -p | 14:36 | ||
| cotto | ? | 14:47 | |
| What does/did -p do? | |||
| Coke | cotto: generated profiling output based on opcode. | 14:48 | |
| looked very much like the proof of concept that the GSOC student submitted. | |||
| "this opcode was invoked N times", that sort of thing. | |||
| wondering if you ripped it out when you added the callgrindy profiling. | |||
|
14:48
pmichaud joined
|
|||
| mikehh | Coke, cotto: how are you on unwrapped macro arguments - include/parrot/avl_tree.h in avl_string_cache branch has a bunch (struct oriented etc.) | 14:49 | |
| Coke | mikehh: I think enforcing coding standards on a file we're copying from another repo is silly. | ||
| mikehh | Coke: yeah I thought of that | 14:50 | |
| Coke | (unless we're forking it.) | ||
| mikehh | well it has changed - Parrot stuff | ||
| khairul | hi Coke, I'm the student who wrote that proposal. | 14:51 | |
| what i intended to do with the proof is to see if i can intercept and inspect the instructions. | |||
| that was the simplest thing that i could think of at that time. | |||
| Coke | khairul: hio. | ||
|
14:51
theory joined
|
|||
| cotto | I do recall ripping something like that out. | 14:52 | |
| Coke | khairul: I figured that it wasn't the final product. It just made me wonder where the old version of that particular item went. | ||
| looks like the short help still refers to -p as a valid option, that probably needs to be cleaned up. | |||
| cotto | chromatic and I didn't see it as being particularly valuable for debugging/profiling. | ||
|
14:56
patspam joined
|
|||
| Coke | nope. sub level was much more interesting to me, for sure. | 15:02 | |
|
15:05
davidfetter joined
15:06
davidfetter joined
15:31
jjore joined
15:36
cotto_work joined
|
|||
| tewk | Coke, do you know how to silence "warning: function returns address of local variable" for a specific function in GCC? | 15:37 | |
| atrodo | you don't want to silence it, you want to fix it | 15:45 | |
| if i remember correctly, your return value is a pointer, but the value you're returning is a local variable on the stack, not a pointer. If you end up calling anything between the return and using the result, unpredicted stuff can happen since the stack could have changed | 15:51 | ||
| tewk | atrodo, I know what I'm doing. I actually fixed it by putting it on a separate line. It was already casted, but gcc somehow ignored the cast on the return line in the static analysis. | 15:54 | |
| atrodo, taking the address of a stack variable is one way finding out the stack depth when doing vm and gc work. | |||
| atrodo | tewk> Alright. I just have bad flashbacks of that error | ||
| tewk> Ah, makes perfect sense | 15:55 | ||
| NotFound | tewk: casting casts the type. Being localy declared isn't a type. | 15:58 | |
| tewk | atrodo, for the normal programmer doing typical coding that warning can be disastrous. | ||
| atrodo | tewk> Aye, it was. very very disastrous. We had ignored it for years in one version of gcc with no ill effects. Recompiled with a new version and stuff stopped working. Not fun. | 16:00 | |
|
16:07
estrabd joined
16:08
cotto joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | tewk: cast the pointer to size_t and return that | 16:23 | |
| tewk | whiteknight, thats what I did. but I had to do the cast in a distinct statement from the return to get rid of the warning. | ||
| whiteknight | ok | ||
| it's my experience that silencing compiler warnings, even the well-intentioned "best practices" ones can require some of the most esoteric knowledge and crafty ninja coding | 16:27 | ||
| ironically, silencing the warnings can make the code more nuanced, and harder to read/maintain | 16:28 | ||
|
16:31
hercynium joined
|
|||
| tewk | Maybe gcc has some attribute to turn it off I just don't know which, turning off a warning (with a comment) adds info and documentation as to why this code is special and how it might be refactored in the future as compilers get smarter. | 16:31 | |
| NotFound | whiteknight: but the bugs and problem inexistent because warning prevented are invisible. | ||
| whiteknight | NotFound: this is true. I don't argue with that | 16:32 | |
|
16:38
payload joined
16:56
darbelo joined
|
|||
| Coke | tewk: IANACP. =-) | 17:12 | |
| tewk | Coke, but, You have recently been knighted as the keeper of C compiler warnings :) | 17:13 | |
|
17:13
Mokurai1 joined
|
|||
| tewk | Coke, I figured it out though | 17:13 | |
| Coke | tewk++ | 17:16 | |
| moritz | I have a patch here that removes the 'non-existent' from the auld 'Could not find non-existent sub %s' message | 17:20 | |
| any objections to applying it? | |||
| PerlJam | moritz: ask forgiveness rather than permission :) | 17:23 | |
| whiteknight | moritz: +1 from me | ||
| moritz | pushed. | 17:24 | |
| dalek | rrot: r45358 | moritz++ | trunk (2 files): Remove the "non-existant" part of error messages for not finding a sub might exist, just in a different scope. |
||
|
17:43
joeri joined
17:45
davidfetter joined
17:47
iblechbot joined
|
|||
| Tene | sorear: pong | 17:54 | |
| sorear: I'm currently dealing with moving to a new state. I'll have plenty of time to work on it in the near future, but I'm very busy immediately. | 17:55 | ||
| Coke | Tene: is it a good state? =-) | 17:59 | |
| szbalint | steady state? | 18:02 | |
| treed | Coke: I think so. | 18:13 | |
| Tene | Coke: Palo Alto, CA | 18:20 | |
| from SLC, UT | 18:21 | ||
| whiteknight | tene: get a new job out there? | ||
| Tene | whiteknight: Yeah. | ||
| whiteknight | any place good? | ||
| Tene | Same place that hired treed, and convinced him to move. | ||
| Coke | PA, I'm guessing google? | ||
| Tene | Nope. | 18:22 | |
| imvu.com/ | |||
| treed | Google is Mountain View | ||
| down the road | |||
| a better guess for PA would be Facebook | |||
| whiteknight | oh nice, virtual porn | ||
| treed | We're actually in the old Facebook offices. | ||
| whiteknight: If only. | |||
| If we had porn I might actually use it myself. | |||
| As it is, I have no need for 3D chat. | 18:23 | ||
| But the technology behind it is fun. | |||
| dukeleto | Tene: starting a parrot cadre there? | ||
| Tene | dukeleto: Hopefully. ;) | ||
| dukeleto | Tene: imvu seems like a web-based second-life-kinda-thingy ? | 18:24 | |
| treed | dukeleto: Not web-based. | ||
| Downloadable client. | |||
| Tene | but yeah, kinda like that | ||
| treed | The big difference between SL and us is world persistence. | ||
| We don't have a big persistent world. | |||
| We do instances. | |||
| dukeleto | treed: interesting | ||
| treed: once everyone leaves a particular instance, it goes poof? | 18:25 | ||
| treed | So you just start a room with whatever dressings you want (that you have in your inventory) | ||
| dukeleto: Yep. | |||
| Tene AFK, driving in to last day at $oldjob | |||
| treed | It's much more efficient. | ||
| We also have other things going on. | |||
| We sell music for instance. | |||
| dukeleto | Tene: good luck! | 18:26 | |
| purl | You'll need it. | ||
| dalek | rrot: r45359 | NotFound++ | trunk/src (2 files): move paths initialization from environmental vars experimental feature from parrot main executable to interpreter initialization in library |
18:30 | |
|
18:39
ash_ joined
|
|||
| Coke tricks out his bash prompt so it shows (svn:^/trunk) or (svn:^/branches/foo) for parrot dev. | 18:42 | ||
| davidfetter | pmichaud, around? | 18:45 | |
| whiteknight | Coke: my prompt always shows svn:rev or git:branch | 18:55 | |
| atrodo | what magic incantations do you do to make that happen? | 18:56 | |
| nopaste | "coke" at 72.228.52.192 pasted "extra prompty goodness" (23 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/20149 | 19:00 | |
| whiteknight | a script to call svn info and set the prompt using the information there. Then a series of command aliases for the svn commands that call __update_prompt on every change | ||
| Coke: fancy-schmance | 19:02 | ||
| darbelo | Pretty colors and all- | 19:03 | |
| atrodo | Coke> i am impressed | ||
| Coke | danke. got basic versions via google and cleaned it up. | 19:05 | |
| whiteknight | ssssh! Don't give away the secret! | 19:06 | |
| I guess I wasn't aware that $PS1 would get evaluated each time | 19:09 | ||
| Austin | Also, command substitution. | ||
| Coke: The parse_git_branch function is a little weird if there's more than one branch. You probably want sed -ne 's/.../p' | 19:10 | ||
|
19:11
bacek joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | oh snap. This crap works | 19:14 | |
| this is going to simplify some of my scripts significantly | |||
|
19:19
Mokurai joined,
Mokurai1 joined
|
|||
| Coke | Austin: how can you have more than one branch at a time? | 19:19 | |
| (hint: 99.99% of the time, that says (git:master) for me. =-) | 19:20 | ||
| Austin | Coke: it's easy. | ||
|
19:20
brooksbp joined
|
|||
| Coke | Austin: it's easy is one of those "i'm lying to you" trigger phrases. ^_^ | 19:21 | |
| Austin | Not for me. | ||
| brooksbp | Parrot operates on CPS, correct? | ||
| Austin | One of the whole points of git is that it's cheap and easy to create a branch, do your thing, and then re-merge. | ||
| So your local repo can easily have n>1 branches. | |||
| Your working directory will only be "on" one of those branches - that's why the sed script looks for the literal '*' character. | 19:22 | ||
| But git branch lists all of them... | |||
| whiteknight | brooksbp: yes | 19:24 | |
| brooksbp: and it's mostly correct now too | |||
| Coke | Austin: I thought the * indicated the current branch, no? | 19:26 | |
| Austin | Right | ||
| brooksbp | Why was CPS chosen? | ||
| for optimizations? | 19:27 | ||
| Coke | Austin: OIC. | ||
| whiteknight | brooksbp: It's necessary for some of the dynamic languages we want to support | ||
| Austin | Coke: but by default sed passes through any lines that don't match. So if "git branch" prints "branch1 \\n branch2 \\n * branch3" | ||
| Coke | yes, good catch. | ||
| Austin | You'll get 3 lines of output | ||
| whiteknight | plus, it has some cool features, and lots of optimization potential | ||
| Coke | I didn't happen to test that. fixed. | ||
| Austin | Score one for the SCM nerd... | 19:28 | |
| brooksbp | whiteknight: has anyone working on Parrot checked out control flow analysis work? Stuff by Olin Shivers or Matt Might | ||
| whiteknight | brooksbp: sort of, but nothing implemented | ||
| brooksbp: I could use a refresher, have any papers in particular that you recommend? | 19:30 | ||
| brooksbp | whiteknight: does Parrot do variable & dead code elimation? | ||
| whiteknight | not currently. We perform very few optimizations | ||
| brooksbp | I'm currently reading Control Flow Analysis in Scheme by Olin Shivers. Great stuff | ||
| Austin | In case anyone cares, the state of New Jersey is giving rebates to people who purchase certain types of household appliances during the month of April, while funds last. Typically, these include refrigerators, hot water heaters, dish and clothes washers. (There may be others.) *Other states* will be doing this, possibly at different times. It's part of a federal stimulus package - a sort of... | ||
| ..."cash for clunkers" program for appliances. | 19:31 | ||
| brooksbp | But CPS is crucial to all these analyses 0CFA, kCFA | ||
| Coke | actually, I think IMCC does do dead code elimination. | ||
| brooksbp | There's also Control Flow Analysis of Functional Programs by Jan Midtgaard (good overview of techniques) | 19:32 | |
| whiteknight | damnit, eventually I'm going to need to get a damn ACM subscription | ||
| brooksbp | there are PDF copies floating around. I believe Citeseerx has all these papers | 19:33 | |
| Coke | (if it does it's in "compilers/imcc/optimizer.c") | ||
| Austin | Whiteknight: probably not. The ACM/citeseer "let's get in the way and charge money" scam is being effectively destroyed by the internet. Google is your friend. | ||
| whiteknight | Austin: Yeah, I'll find a copy of it eventually. | 19:34 | |
| Coke: the stuff in compilers/imcc/optimizer.c is relatively light and I don't think it's used very often | |||
| ash_ | whiteknight: if you know who its by you could always ask if they'd donate a copy of the article to your cause, some people would probably be fine with sending you a pdf of the article | ||
| Coke | yah, pbc_disassemble shows it's not optimized out. (but parrot -O does shuffle things a bit.) | 19:35 | |
| also, allison has said in the past she'd get people copies of papers, IIRC. | |||
| whiteknight | ash_: I can get things through google too. My desire to follow the "rules" doesn't extend very deep | 19:37 | |
| Coke: yes, allison has gotten me copies of things before | 19:38 | ||
| I have a whole pile of papers at home that I read and re-read | |||
| bacek | ~~ | 19:40 | |
| whiteknight | hello bacek | 19:41 | |
| bacek | morning whiteknight | ||
|
19:42
payload joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | brooksbp: Parrot definitely needs optimizations though. We have a handful but we need a lot more | 19:43 | |
| And we need them at multiple levels. We need them at the assembler level, but we also need tree optimizers for PAST | 19:44 | ||
| ash_ | whiteknight: maybe I could add that to my GSoC proposal? work on AST optimizations for pir? | 19:45 | |
| whiteknight | ash_: What is your proposal? | ||
| ash_ | whiteknight: mine was the llvm stack frame builder, but that doesn't sound like it will take me 11 weeks | 19:46 | |
| whiteknight | ash_: When I was a prospective student, particle gave me two options: AST optimizations, or GC. I asked which was more important at the time and they said GC | ||
| bacek | Speaking of GSoC. We do need immutable strings early than end-of-gsoc. Before R*. | 19:47 | |
| For performance reasons. | |||
| whiteknight | ash_: What if you instead create an optimized code-generating backend for PCT? | ||
|
19:47
bluescreen joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | ash_: be able to generate .PBC directly from PAST without using PIR/IMCC as an intermediary | 19:48 | |
| bacek | ash_, I can probably help with optimizations. May be I still remember how to do it... | ||
| whiteknight | ash_: and adding in optional optimization stages in between would be a nice touch that would fill time | ||
| bacek | whiteknight, s/PAST/POST/ | ||
| brooksbp | whiteknight: can you provide a reference to what optimizations need to be worked on? | ||
| whiteknight | bacek: well, he could be adding the stages that perform the optimizations in POST | ||
| brooksbp: I don't have a list. start with "everything" and go from there. | 19:49 | ||
| bacek | whiteknight, semantics of PAST is way too fuzzy. | ||
| whiteknight | you mentioned dead-code elimination. constant folding might be nice but there will be some difficulties there. Global variable extraction may be nice | ||
| bacek | brooksbp, even simple things like DCE, CF, etc will be good start | 19:50 | |
| anyway, time to go. | |||
| whiteknight | later, bacek | ||
| bacek | Catch you later. | ||
| ash_ | i have the blue book and the dragon book, so i'll re-read those chapters on optimizations | ||
| whiteknight | ash_: awesome | ||
| we need a better register allocator too | |||
| bacek | ash_, find Munchick (if I spell it correctly) | ||
| whiteknight | though that's not exactly an optimization | ||
| bacek | ash_, "Advanced Compilers Design and Implementation" | 19:51 | |
| ash_ | umm by PCT, do you mean the whole compiler toolkit or is there a specific place i'd be looking to work on? i don't know it that well | ||
| whiteknight | I think one of the biggest optimizations we could add (though it would be a destructive optimization) would be elimination of unnecessary nested lexical scopes | ||
| ash_: actually, it would mostly be in NQP-RX now | |||
| I guess PCT has been superceeded by that | |||
| ash_ | hmmm | 19:52 | |
| okay, i can do that, lol, i am implementing my own version of nqp right now | |||
| whiteknight | you will definitely want to get in touch with pmichaud if you're seriously considering this project | ||
| even if you did nothing besides create a proper framework for adding optimizations and writing documentation for it, it would be a huge success | |||
| PBC generation would be awesome too | |||
| ash_ | so, specifically, the ability to generate a PBC directly from various formats (like .nqp to .pbc) would be a good goal | 19:53 | |
| dalek | rrot: r45360 | NotFound++ | trunk (2 files): fix FPA.init_int and add a test for it |
||
| brooksbp | hmmm so what optimizations does parrot do? | ||
| ash_ | also, better code generation from nqp specifically, or from other areas? Would i need to do anything with pir's compiler? | ||
| whiteknight | brooksbp: trac.parrot.org/parrot/browser/trun...ptimizer.c | 19:55 | |
| that's the complete list, as far as I knw, and not all of these may be currntly used | |||
| cotto_work | imcc's optimizer is pretty broken. | ||
| ash_ | whiteknight: i also have www.amazon.com/gp/product/013606705...ss_product "Crafting a Compiler" (formally "Crafting a Compiler with C", its a bit more generalized now, it talks about C and Java approaches) | 19:56 | |
| whiteknight | ash_: how is that book? I've browsed it but never bought | 19:57 | |
| cotto_work: yeah, that's my current understanding too | |||
| we really don't have any optimizations | |||
| Parrot really has two abstraction layers where optimizations can be inserted: At the HLL level (in NQP, and PAST), and at the PIR level (in IMCC/PIRC) | |||
| ash_ | in some area's its more specific than the dragon book, as it gives more working examples, but i haven't seen anything it does that much better than the dragon book, but it does have good examples | 19:58 | |
| whiteknight | we don't really have any optimizations in either of those places | ||
|
19:59
payload joined
|
|||
| TimToady | phone | 20:00 | |
| ash_ | whiteknight: so most of the nqp improvements would be PAST level optimizations | 20:01 | |
| davidfetter | pesky gadget | ||
| whiteknight | ash_: yes. Better PAST leads to less PIR | ||
| and then better PIR leads to faster PBC | |||
| ash_ | would it be useful to also work on imcc level improvements to? | ||
| whiteknight | those are the two optimization levels | ||
| ash_: Everything would be useful. You have to pick a project that you think you can do in a single summer | 20:02 | ||
| ash_: it would be *very* easy to take more work than you can complete | |||
| ash_ | kk, how would those kinds of improvements compare to the llvm based stack frame builder? | 20:03 | |
| whiteknight | ash_: Both projects have merits. The frame builder obviously should get rid of our NCI thunks and therefore reduce code size | 20:04 | |
| optimization stages for PAST would likely have a more immediate performance impact on HLLs, the frame builder would bring more flexibility to NCI-based projects | |||
| send an email to the list asking for input, see what people think is best | 20:05 | ||
| ash_ | kk | 20:06 | |
| PerlJam | Both! ;) | 20:08 | |
| PAST optimization would be most useful IMHO as it could be immediately used by all HLLs that target parrot. | 20:10 | ||
| NCI improvements could be immeidately used, but there aren't that many people doing NCI-ish things by comparison | 20:11 | ||
| NotFound | PerlJam: fot all HLLs that use PAST | 20:12 | |
|
20:12
kurahaupo joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | We do a lot of NCI internally to Parrot, but there are a limited number of signatures used internally, and the thunks necessary to support that are small and few | 20:13 | |
| PerlJam | NotFound: That's true, more and more are. | 20:14 | |
| I guess it really is a toss-up then. | |||
| whiteknight | plus, replacing built-in thunks with dynamically-built frames trades off some performance, so it would actually be a net loss, in the short term, to move to compeltely llvm-based frame builds | ||
| PerlJam | I'd still leant towards the PAST optimizations though | ||
| s/leant/lean/ | |||
| whiteknight | anyway, I'm leaving. Later | ||
| cotto_work | 4796565365/4860859864 | 20:17 | |
| purl | 0.986773019424779 | ||
| cotto_work | 4796565365/4860859864/1 | ||
| purl | 0.986773019424779 | ||
| cotto_work | 1/4796565365/4860859864 | 20:18 | |
| purl | 4.28900479773598e-20 | ||
| Coke | pmichaud++ # SQUEE | 20:19 | |
| cotto_work | What are you squeeing about? Is his life back to normal? | 20:20 | |
| Coke | karma is good. =-) | 20:22 | |
| purl | is good. =-) has neutral karma | ||
| Coke | purl, botdeath. | ||
| purl | Coke: i'm not following you... | ||
| NotFound | purl: Do you use twitter? | ||
| purl | i don't know, notfound | ||
|
20:25
chromatic joined
|
|||
| Coke | cheese it, it's the chromatic. | 20:26 | |
|
20:26
davidfetter joined
|
|||
| chromatic | Maybe I need a title like "Dean". | 20:26 | |
| dalek | rrot: r45361 | NotFound++ | trunk/src/interp/inter_misc.c: check for compreg hash PMC nullness, not for NULL, in Parrot_compreg |
||
| rrot: r45362 | NotFound++ | trunk/src/global_setup.c: shorten and fix iglobals initialization |
|||
| Coke | reminder, last day to submit talks for YAPC::NA. | 20:29 | |
| kurahaupo | Vice chancellor chromatic ? | 20:31 | |
| Coke | you've disappointed me for the last time, Admiral chromatic. | 20:32 | |
| atrodo | Internally, I automatically say "chromatic, his holiness," | ||
| NotFound | Padisha Imperator | ||
|
20:40
brooksbp_ joined
|
|||
| kurahaupo | :w | 20:42 | |
| chromatic | Space Pope His Excellency | ||
| kurahaupo | Your nondiatonicitousness | 20:43 | |
| Austin | I'd be a little leery of anything with "pope" in the title right now. | ||
|
20:44
preflex joined
|
|||
| Austin | You may find yourself in front of a judge in Kentucky trying to explain that you really didn't know anything about any child molestation, and besides, you're a head of state.. | 20:44 | |
| NotFound | They can even add 'Abusing little parrots' to the list of sins | 20:45 | |
| kurahaupo | As a foreign head of state, don't you automatically get diplomatic immunity? | ||
| Austin | kurahaupo: There's a whole bunch of things wrong with that question. | ||
| kurahaupo | use humour_guard qw( applies_to => 'all mention of chromatic\\'s title' ); | 20:47 | |
| Austin | He's not accused of a crime, but wanted as a witness. He's not accused in criminal, but rather civil court. And he may not have been a head of state when the crimes were committed. Finally, diplomatic immunity generally applies to designated representatives operating in another country, which he isn't - especially relevant if the suit is civil. | ||
| Heh | |||
| kurahaupo | But if one fails to appear for a witness summons, that's a criminal matter ... from which one is immune, no? | 20:48 | |
| Austin | Nope. | ||
| kurahaupo | argh. </politics> | 20:49 | |
| Austin | In the US, failure to appear isn't criminal. | ||
| It's procedural. | |||
| kurahaupo | So you can't be arrested for not appearing? | ||
| Austin | You can be arrested, but it's a procedural matter - we're arresting you to force you to appear. | ||
| There's some latin phrase that applies - appropriate, for a pope. | 20:50 | ||
| kurahaupo wonders what "diplomatic immunity" is worth if it doesn't mean you're exempt from arrest | |||
| Austin | But the courts turn a blind eye to how witnesses and criminals appear | ||
| chromatic | Hostes alienigeni me abduxerunt? | ||
| PerlJam | kurahaupo: it means you're immune from prosecution. | 20:51 | |
| NotFound | Even for bacteriae? | ||
| Austin | Kura - diplomatic immunity is "good for" not being arrested for "crimes." | 20:52 | |
| And in general, failing to respect (grant immunity) a foreign representative is a bad idea. | 20:53 | ||
| But when the Ukranian UN diplos in NYC got drunk and hit and killed a girl, they spent the night in jail. | |||
| (And the next day they got put on an airplane...) | |||
| kurahaupo | chromatic: what did you see while you were off-planet? | 20:54 | |
| chromatic | The Vorlon homeworld, Patrick McGoohan was in charge. | 20:55 | |
| kurahaupo | Aah, so now you're just a number, not a man. How about 1.05946309435929526455 ? | 20:56 | |
| (2^(1/12)) | |||
| purl | 2 | ||
| kurahaupo | (2**(1/12)) | 20:57 | |
| purl | 1.0594630943593 | ||
|
21:03
jsut|work joined,
jsut|werk joined
21:33
atrodo joined
|
|||
| Andy | please confirm: src/dynpmc/*.pmc are going away? | 21:57 | |
| dalek | kudo: 6a2e0ae | jonathan++ | src/ (2 files): Lexical multis now incorporate outer candidates. |
22:03 | |
| kudo: 47ab4c2 | jonathan++ | t/spectest.data: Turn S06-multi/lexical-multis.t back on. |
|||
|
22:09
tcurtis joined
22:11
Mokurai1 joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r45363 | petdance++ | trunk/lib/Parrot/Ops2c/Utils.pm: protect the args passed into the generated funcs |
22:24 | |
|
22:36
snarkyboojum joined
22:44
kid51 joined
22:57
tetragon joined
|
|||
| dalek | kudo: 7d00af1 | jonathan++ | src/Perl6/Grammar.pm: Add the C++ constructor detection/error and a slightly simpler version of the Perl 5 regex modifier detection/error as per STD. |
23:07 | |
| rrot-plumage: f1708eb | japhb++ | Configure.nqp: [BUILD] Add extra trailing newline on final Configure message |
23:08 | ||
| rrot-plumage: c6347ce | japhb++ | src/plumage.nqp: [plumage] Apply slightly altered patch from fperrad++ to support PLUMAGE_HOME env var, especially useful on Windows |
|||
|
23:18
TiMBuS joined
23:21
kurahaupo joined
|
|||
| kid51 | I see our Smolder site is back to its old tricks: HTTP CODE: 500 (read timeout) | 23:30 | |
|
23:43
jsut joined
|
|||
| allison | Andy: only deprecated PMCs in src/dynpmc/*.pmc are going away | 23:44 | |
| Andy: and we'll be adding some new ones | |||
|
23:58
snarkyboojum joined
|
|||