|
Parrot 2.9.1 Released | parrot.org | Log: irclog.perlgeek.de/parrot/today | Long live Git! github.com/parrot/parrot | git clone git://github.com/parrot/parrot.git Set by moderator on 10 November 2010. |
|||
| mikehh | I have always built parrot first and used my installed parrot NOT --gen-parrot | 00:00 | |
|
00:02
seanstickle joined
|
|||
| dukeleto | mikehh: moritz would know, could be a bug | 00:03 | |
| whiteknight | 6 smoke reports tonight | 00:04 | |
| I would have had 8, if I could get stupid icc installed on this box | |||
|
00:07
donaldh left
00:08
hercynium left
00:14
theory left
|
|||
| whiteknight | HA! I got icc working | 00:29 | |
| eat that, intel | |||
| dukeleto kicks icc while it is on the ground | |||
| dukeleto doesn't trust anything that starts with an "i" and ends in "cc" | |||
| whiteknight can't think of any other words that fit that criteria | 00:31 | ||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: IMCC | ||
| dukeleto gives whiteknight a demerit | |||
| whiteknight | oh damnit, that's the obvious one, isn't it? | ||
| I like ICC when I use it | 00:34 | ||
| my compiler of choice is clang though | |||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: i have nothing against ICC except that it is not open source. Clang seems to rock. | ||
| mikehh | winxed r684 - builds on parrot ae3500c, ALL tests - make test/test1/test2 PASS, examples seem ok (those I ran) | ||
| whiteknight | dukeleto: not being open source is a valid concern, but good software is good software | 00:35 | |
| mikehh | whiteknight: thought it was open source | 00:36 | |
| whiteknight | no. Intel gives free licenses to open source developers for personal use, but it's not open souce | ||
| mikehh | whiteknight: sorry not thinking straight at the moment, somehow confused ICC with ICU | 00:38 | |
| whiteknight | oh yes, icu is awesome | ||
| mikehh | had a really bad weekend sorting out some problems not of my creation that I was called on to fix, not enough sleep etc (but the $ was good I suppose ;-} ) | 00:41 | |
| whiteknight | good $ makes up for a lot of shortcomings in the employee-employer relationship | 00:42 | |
| okay. gcc, g++, clang, and icc with and without --optimize all PASS on Ubuntu 10.10/x64 | 00:45 | ||
| mikehh | whiteknight++ | ||
| I ran up to fulltest with g++-4.5 (with/without --optimize) | 00:47 | ||
| whiteknight | my gcc/g++ are 4.4, not 4.5 | 00:48 | |
| I don't run fulltest too often | |||
| mikehh | it is the default on 10.10 - but I have installed 4.5 as well and use that | 00:49 | |
| and use perl 5.12.2 rather than 5.10.1 | |||
| which I build with gcc-4.5 | 00:50 | ||
| whiteknight | I rarely get too much software that I need to build myself | 00:51 | |
| atrodo | Can I get a quick rundown on how to run an optimized smoke? | 01:03 | |
| whiteknight | perl Configure.pl --optimize | ||
| perl Configure.pl --optimize && make && make smoke | |||
| atrodo | thanks! | 01:04 | |
| passed on optimized as well smolder.parrot.org/app/projects/rep...tails/1105 | 01:14 | ||
|
01:19
dmalcolm left
01:46
seanstickle left
01:52
dngor_ joined
01:56
dngor left
01:58
dngor joined
01:59
dngor_ left
|
|||
| cotto | ~~ | 02:03 | |
|
02:34
rurban_ joined
02:35
bluescreen left
02:36
rurban left,
rurban_ is now known as rurban
02:40
dngor_ joined
02:41
dngor left
|
|||
| bacek_at_work | ~~ | 03:02 | |
| cotto | hi bacek_at_work | 03:03 | |
| bacek_at_work | cotto, hello | 03:04 | |
| GeJ | servus cotto. | ||
| G'Day bacek. | |||
| bacek_at_work | G'Day GeJ. Howizgoin'? | 03:05 | |
| GeJ | Sick, tired and mad. Gimme some C4, and I'll make the news tonight. And you? How's your day? | 03:06 | |
| dalek | rrot/gsoc_nci: d3f8f9b | jkeenan++ | / (3 files): [configure] Allow for possibility that pkg-config might not be present. Extract code for determinining that possibility into internal method and test it. Correct error in number of tests in plan in init::defaults. |
03:08 | |
|
03:10
jsut_ left
|
|||
| bacek_at_work | gsoc_nci report smolder.parrot.org/app/projects/rep...tails/1107 (Debian Linux/i386 + libffi + optimize) | 03:10 | |
|
03:15
whiteknight left
03:27
jsut joined
|
|||
| dukeleto | 'ello | 03:27 | |
|
03:28
adu joined
|
|||
| cotto | 'i | 03:30 | |
| dukeleto | our NEWS for 2.10.0 looks pretty bad | 03:31 | |
| didn't we, like, do stuff in the last month? | |||
| bacek_at_work | we did almost nothing... | ||
|
03:34
dngor_ is now known as dngor
|
|||
| dukeleto | bacek_at_work: maybe you did almost nothing... | 03:36 | |
| bacek_at_work: a lot of work happened on branches, but not many got merged to master | |||
| bacek_at_work | dukeleto, I know. But is hard to sell :) | ||
| dukeleto | bacek_at_work: what about mentioning all our new git docs in NEWS? If not, no one will find them | 03:38 | |
| bacek_at_work: i am willing to improve NEWS, but people need to tell me what they want in there, or I will just put what I think people need to hear | |||
| cotto | dukeleto, have you trolled #ps? | 03:39 | |
| bacek_at_work | I think git-related stuff deserve to be more covered in NEWS. | ||
| dalek | rrot: b389465 | dukeleto++ | NEWS: Add some meat to our NEWS burrito |
03:42 | |
| dukeleto | cotto: possibly. I troll myself sometimes and don't know it. | ||
| cotto | I'm usually intentional when autotrolling. | 03:43 | |
| dukeleto | I am putting GCI stuff in NEWS. It is important. | 03:47 | |
| dalek | rrot: a635260 | dukeleto++ | NEWS: Add a bit of garnish to the NEWS burrito |
03:51 | |
| dukeleto | pkg-config is deprecated now, correct? | 03:56 | |
| does that need to be added to DEPRECATED.POD or something? | |||
| cotto | good question for whiteknight | 03:57 | |
|
04:05
theory joined
|
|||
| cotto | dukeleto, how soon can you get a parrot-commits script set up? | 04:07 | |
| dukeleto | cotto: meh. i am not very motivated to do it. who actually wants it? | 04:14 | |
| dalek | rrot: 3128984 | dukeleto++ | NEWS: Add a few spices to the NEWS burrito |
04:15 | |
| cotto does | 04:16 | ||
| but knowing that you're not motivated is helpful | |||
| dukeleto | i see many other things as being a better use of my time | 04:17 | |
| i just time "git pull --rebase && git log -p" and i have a colored diff history of Parrot. Why do I want to use email? | |||
| I hate email. | |||
| s/i just time/i just type/ | |||
| also, git log --pretty=format:'%C(yellow)%h%Creset %s %Cred%an%Creset %Cblue%d%Creset %Cgreen%cr%Creset %cd' --graph --all | 04:19 | ||
| which i alias to "git plog" | |||
| cotto | dukeleto, is the video at wiki.pentaho.com/display/BEEKEEPER/...+Recording broken for you? | 04:20 | |
| dukeleto | Now our NEWS file looks respectable. | ||
| cotto: it is flash | |||
| cotto | you don't do flash? | 04:21 | |
| GeJ | Hum, did anyone see the note on build failure under Windows? | ||
| dukeleto | cotto: i selectively enable it | ||
| cotto | I hate it much less now that it's out-of-process for firefox and chromium. | 04:22 | |
| dukeleto | It is still the same black box of security and proprietary-ish software. | ||
| GeJ | How close are we to the release? | 04:23 | |
| dukeleto | GeJ: soon | ||
| cotto | GeJ, it ought to happen within the next 24 hours or so | ||
| GeJ | Could be worth having a look at the github note attached to commit 2d9999d | 04:24 | |
| dukeleto | GeJ: link? | ||
| GeJ | github.com/parrot/parrot/commit/2d...ent-194690 | 04:25 | |
| dukeleto | particle: ping! Windows code review appreciated. ^^^ | 04:26 | |
| cotto | one of the comments has a link to the swf file | 04:28 | |
| GeJ | aloha: clock? | 04:29 | |
| aloha | GeJ: GeJ: LAX: Mon, 20:29 PST / CHI: Mon, 22:29 CST / NYC: Mon, 23:29 EST / UTC: Tue, 04:29 UTC / LON: Tue, 04:29 GMT / BER: Tue, 05:29 CET / TOK: Tue, 13:29 JST / SYD: Tue, 15:29 EST | ||
| GeJ | thanks girl. | ||
| dukeleto | I think we should institute a policy of people adding to NEWS whenever they think something is worthy to note to end users. | 04:35 | |
| we can always trim it at release time if it is too much detail | |||
| cotto | That'd be a good habit to get into. | 04:36 | |
| dukeleto | If i didn't just do some code spelunking to see what we did in the last month, our NEWS release was going to be pitiful. | ||
| Heroic efforts are not to be relied on. | |||
| cotto | If you didn't do it, I'm sure tcurtis or someone else would have. | 04:37 | |
| dukeleto | cotto: where should this go in our project docs? | ||
| cotto | (not to minimize your efforts, which are appreciated) | ||
| I think it needs to be more of a cultural thing. | |||
| dukeleto | cotto: sure, but that is not the point. The point is that everyone should share the fun of adding to NEWS. It is how we communicate what we do to end users. It is important. | ||
| cotto: sure, i understand. But it can go as a sidenote in the git workflow "Add something to NEWS about your commit if you feel it is appropriate" | 04:38 | ||
| i don't want to carve rules in stone, but i do want tribal knowledge to be documented | 04:39 | ||
| cotto | wfm, without the "if you feel it is appropriate". Nobody's going to add something they don't feel belongs. | ||
| dukeleto | cotto: indeed. | 04:40 | |
| cotto: i will work it more positively | |||
| s/work/word/ | |||
| dalek | rrot: d0ff82f | dukeleto++ | NEWS: Add a link for PL/Parrot in NEWS |
04:43 | |
|
04:56
adu_ joined
04:58
elmex left,
elmex joined
05:00
adu left
05:28
tcurtis joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: 40b9729 | dukeleto++ | docs/project/git_terminology.pod: [docs] Be more correct with regard to root commits in Git |
05:37 | |
| tcurtis | particle: ping | 05:45 | |
| dukeleto | tcurtis: how goes it? | 05:50 | |
| tcurtis: do you feel comfortable with the impending release? do you need help with anything? | 05:51 | ||
| tcurtis | dukeleto: I feel comfortable. The only issue is that I don't think I have privileges on parrot.org to change the url for /release/current and such or to update the docs. | 05:53 | |
| s/the docs/docs.parrot.org/ | |||
| dalek | rrot: 2b8736d | dukeleto++ | docs/project/git_terminology.pod: [docs] Clarify the location of the staging area |
05:56 | |
| rrot: 04e8e4d | dukeleto++ | docs/project/git_terminology.pod: [docs] Document 'useless merge commits' and explain rebasing more |
|||
| dukeleto | tcurtis: Coke and perhaps cotto can do that, methinks | ||
| cotto | yup | 05:58 | |
| tcurtis | Alright. Good night, then, #parrot. | 06:04 | |
| cotto | 'night tcurtis | ||
|
06:11
tcurtis left
|
|||
| bacek_at_work | Andy++ # ack ftw! | 06:23 | |
|
06:23
autark_ joined,
autark left
06:26
bacek left
|
|||
| cotto | I love that tool. | 06:27 | |
| bacek_at_work | Do we have official way of C-code level unittesting? | 06:33 | |
| cotto | bacek_at_work, are you assuming that we have units? | 06:35 | |
|
06:35
jsut_ joined
|
|||
| bacek_at_work | cotto, sigh... | 06:35 | |
| cotto | yeah | 06:36 | |
| suggestions welcome | |||
| Why do you ask? | 06:37 | ||
| bacek_at_work | I do want test GC on code level. Not parrot level. | ||
| cotto | have you used any C unit testing frameworks? | 06:39 | |
|
06:40
jsut left
|
|||
| bacek_at_work | only C++ | 06:41 | |
| and C# | |||
| particle | see testanything.org/wiki/index.php/TAP...2F_C.2B.2B | 06:42 | |
| cotto | There seem to exist some in C. | ||
| bacek_at_work | CUnit looks all right. Probably will play with it tonight. | 06:44 | |
| cotto | What's good to look for in a unit testing framework? | 06:45 | |
| bacek_at_work | for me - at least customizable output. I do want TAP :) | 06:46 | |
| and as less boilerplate code as possible. | |||
| cotto | TAP is almost implicit | 06:47 | |
| GeJ | bacek_at_work: c2.com/cgi/wiki?TestingFramework has a looooong list of frameworks, just in case. | 06:53 | |
| bacek_at_work | GeJ, hey! I don't want huge list! I just need one which works! :) | ||
|
06:54
fperrad joined
|
|||
| cotto | freedom from choice is nice sometimes | 06:55 | |
|
06:55
AzureStone left
|
|||
| cotto | or at least from too many of them | 06:55 | |
| bacek_at_work | ok. Either cUnit or Check. | 06:56 | |
| and time to go home! Hooray | 06:58 | ||
|
06:59
AzureStone joined
07:01
adu_ left
07:04
adu joined
07:16
spinclad left
|
|||
| dalek | p-rx: c4c31a1 | moritz++ | / (2 files): [configure] fix two thinkos |
07:19 | |
|
07:22
bacek joined
|
|||
| bacek | aloha, | 07:22 | |
| ... humans | |||
| cotto | error: humans not found | ||
|
07:23
dukeleto left
|
|||
| cotto | really. I even checked twice. | 07:23 | |
| www.kindahl.net/mytap/doc/ | 07:26 | ||
| There seem to be several C TAP frameworks. | 07:27 | ||
|
07:29
dukeleto joined
|
|||
| cotto | Hmmm. dukeleto, would the parrot-commits mailer be a good gci task? | 07:30 | |
| dukeleto | cotto: sure. Add it as a task. | 07:33 | |
| cotto | are you trying to keep the perl and parrot tasks separate? | ||
| dukeleto | cotto: i would call it "easy" | ||
| cotto: meh. not really. | |||
|
07:34
bacek left
|
|||
| dukeleto | cotto: all those tasks need to be exported to googles web app. thankfully there is a bulk csv importer | 07:34 | |
| cotto: i am trying to order them from easy to medium to difficult | |||
| cotto | wfm | 07:35 | |
| msg cotto_work add parrot-commits to the gci list | 07:36 | ||
| aloha | OK. I'll deliver the message. | ||
|
07:40
bacek joined
|
|||
| bacek | docs/tests.pod is really outdated. | 07:42 | |
| cotto | bacek, I don't think either cunit or check support pod | ||
| several others do though | |||
| bacek | cotto, I'll stick with "c_output_is" for now. | 07:43 | |
| from Parrot::Test | |||
| cotto | that'll work too | 07:44 | |
| and allow for maximum laziness | |||
| Heh. Drupal has decided to move from cvs to git. Suddenly our migration seems trivial. | 08:03 | ||
|
08:11
theory left
|
|||
| moritz suspects that cvs' branching model is closer to git than svn's is | 08:11 | ||
| dalek | rrot: c32f07c | fperrad++ | config/gen/platform/win32/ (2 files): [win32] move WINVER check from misc.h to begin.c like in original patch (see TT#1846) |
08:47 | |
| rrot/gc_ms2_faster_list: d9d81b5 | bacek++ | / (3 files): Stubs for future faster pointer storage. |
09:09 | ||
| rrot/gc_ms2_faster_list: a03a1f0 | bacek++ | / (2 files): Made Parrot_pa_* exported |
|||
| rrot/gc_ms2_faster_list: 77b71f1 | bacek++ | t/src/pointer_array.t: Start adding tests for Pointer_Array. |
|||
| rrot/gc_ms2_faster_list: 5f23c8e | bacek++ | t/src/pointer_array.t: Add more tests for allocating chunks. |
|||
| rrot/gc_ms2_faster_list: 943e588 | bacek++ | t/src/pointer_array.t: Add (failing) test for iterating PA. |
|||
| rrot/gc_ms2_faster_list: f273fd9 | bacek++ | / (2 files): Add more tests and fix pa_remove to properly mark free cells |
|||
| rrot/gc_ms2_faster_list: 6fdab4a | bacek++ | t/src/pointer_array.t: Add more tests. |
|||
| rrot/gc_ms2_faster_list: 0b70f3f | bacek++ | / (2 files): Fix pa_remove to properly maintain 'free list' |
|||
| rrot/gc_ms2_faster_list: 2479225 | bacek++ | src/pointer_array.c: Implement Parrot_pa_destroy. |
|||
| rrot/gc_ms2_faster_list: db2a267 | bacek++ | src/gc/gc_ms2.c: Initial switch to Pointer_Array instead of Linked_List in GC MS2 |
|||
| bacek | yak | ||
| moritz | shaved! | ||
| bacek | Not yet. But I'm getting close to it! | 09:12 | |
| moritz | only a shaved yak is good yak | 09:15 | |
| dalek | rrot/gc_ms2_faster_list: b858241 | bacek++ | src/gc/gc_ms2.c: Resurrect string pool compacting |
09:17 | |
| bacek | Shit... I'm out of beer. And I need at least few more to finish this yak. | ||
|
09:23
mikehh_ joined
09:27
mikehh left
|
|||
| bacek | Yay! branch vs master - 2m06s vs 2m29s! | 09:32 | |
| moritz | for doing what? | ||
| bacek | make test | ||
| moritz | building rakudo? | ||
| bacek | didn't test it yet | ||
| aloha, 2*60 + 6 | |||
| aloha | bacek: 126 | ||
| bacek | aloha, 2*60 + 29 | 09:33 | |
| aloha | bacek: 149 | ||
| bacek | aloha, (149-126)/149 | ||
| aloha | bacek: 0.154362416107383 | ||
| bacek | aloha, (149-126)/149*100 | ||
| aloha | bacek: 15.4362416107383 | ||
| moritz | not bad | ||
| bacek | 15%. Not too bad for 2 days of work :) | ||
| Time to get some beer and finish this yak. | 09:34 | ||
| moritz | bacek: you could use lists.parrot.org/pipermail/parrot-d...04685.html as a test case too | 09:35 | |
| bacek | moritz, we used to have trac ticket for it. It was fixed in GC MS2 already | 09:36 | |
| dalek | rrot: af75053 | fperrad++ | t/ (2 files): [t] fix the nigthmare CRLF on Windows (I work with git config core.autocrlf=true) |
||
| moritz didn't know that | 09:37 | ||
| bacek | hmm... May be I was wrong about it. | 09:39 | |
| moritz, trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1789 this one? | 09:40 | ||
| moritz | nope; that's about string concatenation | 09:41 | |
| bacek | because original .readall did a lot of concatenations inside. | 09:42 | |
| moritz | pmichaud's email was about this: the presence of a large object tree slowed down an otherwise fast-ish operation significantly | 09:44 | |
| because the GC sweeps always considered the full tree, even if it wasn't ever changed after it was loaded | 09:45 | ||
| bacek | ah... It will be (finally) fixed in generational_gc branch :) | 09:46 | |
| moritz | which is why I suggested it as a test case :-) | 09:47 | |
|
09:53
bacek left
|
|||
| sorear | do we have the technology to performance test case stuff? | 09:57 | |
| opbots trust moritz | |||
| slavorg | But I already trust moritz | ||
| slavorgn | But I already trust moritz | ||
| sorear | opbots names | ||
| moritz | sorear: not automatically | ||
|
10:06
bacek joined
|
|||
| bacek | moritz, how long it's usually takes to build rakudo? | 10:17 | |
| moritz | bacek: I haven't timed it in ages... will do now | 10:18 | |
| but it varies greatly across different machines | |||
| sorear | it varies greatly from month to month | ||
| 7 minutes in June, 5 hours in September | |||
| on one machine | 10:19 | ||
| moritz | sorear: where the 5 hours on 2.9.0 or 2.9.1? | 10:20 | |
|
10:20
adu left
|
|||
| sorear | the better one | 10:21 | |
| moritz | ugh. | ||
| bacek | 5 hours???? | 10:25 | |
| moritz guesses a lot of swapping is involved | 10:26 | ||
| sorear | yes | 10:27 | |
| user time for a Rakudo build is always in the 5-20 minute range | 10:28 | ||
| moritz | 7min12 on my box now | ||
| trying now on the branch | 10:30 | ||
|
10:34
rurban_ joined
10:36
rurban left
|
|||
| moritz | 5m37.906s on the branch | 10:36 | |
|
10:36
rurban_ is now known as rurban
|
|||
| moritz | I haven't measured memory usage | 10:36 | |
| sorear | if it's much under 100 million words I'll try it | 10:38 | |
| moritz | is there a simple tool that can measure the peak memory consumpmtion of a process? (linux) | 10:39 | |
| bacek | 11m16s vs 7m12s on my box. | ||
| sorear | moritz: /usr/bin/time if you're running kernel 2.6.32 or newer | ||
| otherwise you'll need to poll top(1) style | 10:40 | ||
| moritz tries it | 10:41 | ||
| sorear: /usr/bin/time reports the maximum resident set size, but not the max. virtual mem | 10:54 | ||
| sorear | Max resident is what I really care about, given COW | 10:55 | |
| well, "max resident with minimal/no swapping" | |||
| dalek | TT #1789 closed by bacek++: String concatenation is really slow | 11:03 | |
| TT #1789: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1789 | |||
| GeJ | bacek: you shrink Rakudo build time by one third? | ||
| bacek | GeJ, something like this :) | 11:04 | |
| moritz waits with the celebration until he has seen the memory usage figures | |||
| GeJ | bacek: impressive feat! | 11:05 | |
| Ship It! | |||
| bacek | not before after release | ||
| moritz | the branch needs more memory to build rakudo | 11:11 | |
| Maximum resident set size (kbytes): 4288848 (branch) vs. 3009360 (master) | 11:12 | ||
| sorear | -more-? | 11:17 | |
| bacek: that ticket has nothing to do with darwin-i386 | 11:25 | ||
| bacek | sorear, we did fix it for other platforms. | ||
| sorear | the problem is that kid51 has 256 MB of memory and can't hack on parrot until the GC is improved | 11:26 | |
|
11:29
Hunger left
11:33
Hunger joined
12:10
jhelwig left
12:43
particle1 joined
12:46
stilgar left
12:49
particle left
|
|||
| dalek | TT #1829 closed by jkeenan++: Recent changes impeded building and testing on smaller boxes | 12:52 | |
| TT #1829: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1829 | |||
|
12:57
PhatEddy joined
|
|||
| PhatEddy | GeJ: you asked me to stop by so I tested the patches on my Activestate / MingW system and it built OK ... | 12:58 | |
| GeJ | PhatEddy: glad to hear it. | 13:00 | |
| fperrad++ | |||
| that's one that won't be a showstopper for the release. | 13:01 | ||
|
13:01
bluescreen joined
|
|||
| GeJ | any report is good to hear by now. | 13:01 | |
|
13:16
seanstickle joined
13:22
PerlPilot joined
13:27
PerlJam left
13:48
bacek_ joined
13:52
bacek left
13:57
whiteknight joined
|
|||
| GeJ | Good morning whiteknight. | 13:59 | |
| whiteknight | hello GeJ, how are you today? | 14:04 | |
|
14:14
mikehh_ is now known as mikehh
|
|||
| GeJ | whiteknight: Well, I'm more and more convinced that generating XML schemas should only be allowed to people holding a certification delivered by the W3C. | 14:32 | |
| cheaters should be lapidated. | 14:33 | ||
|
14:39
PhatEddy left
|
|||
| GeJ | whiteknight: and you? | 14:43 | |
| whiteknight | GeJ: I agree wholeheartedly. | 14:58 | |
| In my last job, we had a datafeed for a customer that was written in really ugly XML. I changed some whitespace formatting in the code, and later that day I got emergency emails that the feed was broken | 14:59 | ||
| I come to find out that the recipient was using a COBOL parser and that all fields were fixed-width and that they were parsing the whole document by taking fixed indexes | 15:00 | ||
| GeJ | Shiny. | 15:01 | |
| On my side of the pond, I'm working on massaging XML exports from an application used by several real estate agencies to later import said exports in the database for a website of ours. | 15:03 | ||
| for each item (a house, an appartment, commercial building, whatever...) the client can attach pictures, either as files attached to the XML export or inlined in the XML itself. | 15:04 | ||
| the XSD states something like : In the <FILE> node you can have 0 or 1 <ATTACHED_FILE> child node, or 0 or 1 <INLINE_FILE> child node." | 15:06 | ||
|
15:06
zby__ joined,
zby__ left
|
|||
| GeJ | I asked a customer to send me an export, and tadaaaa! The <FILE> are here but no ATTACHED|INLINE_FILE | 15:07 | |
| whiteknight | great | 15:08 | |
| GeJ | which is correct according to the schema, but is completely useless. | ||
|
15:08
zby left
15:10
PerlPilot left,
PerlJam joined
|
|||
| GeJ | Theoretically, I could have an real estate offer that is both an appartment to rent as well as an office building to sell. | 15:11 | |
|
15:11
lucian joined
|
|||
| GeJ | THEY INVENTED QUANTUM REAL ESTATE! | 15:11 | |
| Quick someone call the Nobel committee. | 15:12 | ||
|
15:22
silug left
15:32
plobsing left,
zby joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | anybody seen tcurtis? We have an ETA on the release yet? | 15:40 | |
|
15:43
plobsing joined
15:48
theory joined
16:00
plobsing left,
plobsing joined
16:08
dmalcolm joined
16:13
mariano joined
16:14
mariano left
|
|||
| dukeleto | 'ello | 16:20 | |
|
16:21
particle joined
16:26
particle1 left
|
|||
| dukeleto | moritz: if you want to track memory use of something, you might want to try: search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-Memalyzer/ | 16:26 | |
| moritz | dukeleto: does that work for non-perl stuff? | 16:29 | |
| dukeleto | moritz: you can spawn any process and track memory use, methinks. It uses /proc, so it only works on linux | 16:30 | |
| moritz | dukeleto: ok, thanks | 16:33 | |
| dukeleto | moritz: it seems to have plugins now, maybe it does more than the last time I checked. | 16:34 | |
| whiteknight | we do have those instrumentation PMC types that need to get fixed up and merged into trunk eventually | 16:47 | |
| I would like those to be included in the core repo by 2.11 | 16:48 | ||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: are you volunteering? | 16:50 | |
| whiteknight | yes | 16:51 | |
| dukeleto | whiteknight: awesome! Maybe you can make some GCI tasks relating to them, such as writing more docs or tests for them | ||
| whiteknight | I don't even think they build right now | ||
| Oooh, I just came up with a great idea for GSoC next summer: basic CUDA interface for Parrot | 16:54 | ||
| NotFound | whiteknight: another one: dbus (maybe too big) | 16:57 | |
| dukeleto | Andy++ # new version of ack | 17:09 | |
| Andy | thanks | ||
| it's been waiting forever | |||
| dukeleto | Andy: ack has improved my life greatly. Thanks for making it happen. | ||
| Andy | I just had some time to kill last night while watching the Daily Show and figured what the hell. | ||
| You're very welcome. | 17:10 | ||
|
17:13
seanstickle left,
seanstickle joined
17:27
silug joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: 2a19514 | tcurtis++ | NEWS: [NEWS] fix typo and mention the charset op removal. |
17:29 | |
|
17:29
tcurtis joined
|
|||
| dukeleto | tcurtis: how goes it? | 17:47 | |
| tcurtis: do you have a time set for when you will tag 'master' as the release? That way we know when we can start breaking things again. | |||
| tcurtis | dukeleto: I expect to have the release tagged within the next hour. | 17:50 | |
| dukeleto | tcurtis++ # our first release manager in the brave new world of Git | 18:11 | |
| thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version...ocus=57918 is classic Linus | 18:12 | ||
| So I'm sorry, but for something like git, where efficiency was a primary | 18:13 | ||
| objective, the "advantages" of C++ is just a huge mistake. The fact that | |||
| we also piss off people who cannot see that is just a big additional | |||
| advantage. | |||
| tcurtis | $ grep -c "Result: FAIL" make_fulltest.log | 18:15 | |
| 0 | |||
| dukeleto | tcurtis: looks promising | 18:16 | |
| NotFound | dukeleto: Date: 2007-09-06 Hot news? ;) | 18:18 | |
|
18:18
jhelwig joined
|
|||
| dukeleto | tcurtis: we may want to mention that currently our mk_language_shell, create_language scripts are still being ported to git in NEWS. A preemptive warning to people | 18:19 | |
| dalek | rrot: c4477dd | tcurtis++ | / (11 files): Release 2.10.0! |
18:22 | |
| rrot: 7dbc0aa | tcurtis++ | NEWS: Add a note to NEWS about mk_language_shell/create_language. |
|||
| tcurtis probably should have waited until he tested the tarballs to push, just in case. | 18:23 | ||
| atrodo | dukeleto> thanks for the linus link | 18:24 | |
| dukeleto | tcurtis: you can do an extra "make fulltest" from the tarball before you push it out | 18:25 | |
| tcurtis: i would recommend it as a sanity check. If that is not in the release manager docs, it should be | |||
| tcurtis | dukeleto: It is. I just should have waited to push the release-related commits(although I haven't actually pushed the tag yet) until I'd done so. I expect things to work properly (they did yesterday). | 18:29 | |
| whiteknight | dukeleto: Hah! That email from Linus is very funny. I'm surprised he's so down on C++ though. It seems from his email like he is pretty down on OO in general | 18:30 | |
|
18:31
PerlJam left
|
|||
| atrodo | it's not hard to be pro-oo and anti-c++ | 18:31 | |
| whiteknight | If you're a big C programmer writing a huge system in C, and all your coding buddies are good at C, it makes good sense to write your next project in C | ||
| s/C/any particular programming language/g; | |||
| tcurtis | For some values of "your next project". | 18:32 | |
| whiteknight | if it's what you know and what you can do well, it's probably the best choice for you | ||
| if your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail | |||
| and if C++ is your hammer, every problem looks like your thumb | |||
|
18:34
rurban_ joined
|
|||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: Linus seems to dislike OO in general, but he wrote an OS and a bunch of device drivers before git, so that makes a lot of sense. | 18:34 | |
| atrodo | when C is your tool, nothing looks oo | 18:35 | |
| tcurtis | I think that there are some (language, problem) pairs where even if you know that language and only that language and you know it very well, you're probably better off learning another language to tackle the problem. E.g., at the moment, (Perl 6, operating system kernel) | 18:36 | |
|
18:36
rurban left,
rurban_ is now known as rurban
|
|||
| NotFound | I think the problem is some random fool believing he knows what tool is better for a Linus project better than Linus do. | 18:38 | |
| dukeleto | NotFound: exactly. Getting into language wars with people who have designed operating systems is a fools errand. | 18:40 | |
| atrodo | maybe someone should start a language war about why parrot uses c... | 18:41 | |
|
18:41
seanstickle left
|
|||
| NotFound | Talking about that, a guy wrote me that Winxed is a very nice language but will be better if I convert it to an implementation of some JVM or CLI existent language. | 18:41 | |
| So, he like it but dislikes the language and the target... What he likes, I wonder? | 18:42 | ||
| whiteknight | what makes me laugh here is when people talk about performance comparisons between C and C++. People talk as if code written in C is always as fast or faster than code written in C++ | ||
| dukeleto | atrodo: i am actually in the process of porting Parrot to /bin/sh | ||
| atrodo | dukeleto++ | 18:43 | |
|
18:43
hudnix left
|
|||
| atrodo | Have you thought about ksh, or csh? | 18:43 | |
| NotFound | whiteknight: Stroustrup has an article about that. | ||
| tcurtis | release tagged and pushed but not yet uploaded. | ||
| NotFound | He basically says that all comparations are shit. | 18:44 | |
| dukeleto | tcurtis: can you tell use the sha1 of the tag? | ||
| whiteknight | exactly. The compiler drops it all down to the same machine code. What matters is the skill of the programmer in optimizing | ||
| A good C++ coder should be able to optimize code just as well as a good C coder | |||
| cotto_work | ~~ | 18:45 | |
| NotFound | You can look at the highly optimized garbage collector in winxed stage 0 X-) | 18:46 | |
| dukeleto | $ git rev-parse RELEASE_2_10_0 | ||
| 7dbc0aaf9458f3fe160f973f0be30d579fbdaca4 | |||
|
18:46
hudnix joined
|
|||
| dukeleto | I guess we can start breaking master and merging stuff again. tcurtis: do you give us the thumbs up? | 18:46 | |
| atrodo | NotFound> is that the same gc that's in my lorito prototype? EOUTOFMEMORY? | ||
| NotFound | It does nothing. No one can beat that. | ||
| tcurtis | dukeleto: Indeed. | ||
| Everyone, feel free to start breaking things in master again. | 18:47 | ||
| cotto_work | tcurtis++ | ||
| whiteknight | I see people talking about "hand-optimized assembly" in this thread too. That's bullshit. I've known very few people who were ever any good at hand-optimizing assembly | ||
| NotFound | atrodo: I've been unable to fill enough memory with it, even with my less powered machines. | ||
| dukeleto gets out his flamethrower attached to a chainsaw merry-go-round | 18:48 | ||
| whiteknight | git push origin :master | ||
| NotFound | whiteknight: I knew a guy that optimized for speed a wait-for-keystroke loop. | ||
| atrodo | NotFound> I've been real good at filling my memory up with a moderately sized Fibonacci calculation | ||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: parts of git were hand-optimized assembly for quite a while | ||
| whiteknight: but i think they moved away from it and use heavily macro-ized C | 18:49 | ||
| whiteknight | dukeleto: saying that it's "hand-optimized" assembly, and claiming that it is actually "optimal" are two different things | ||
| cotto_work | dukeleto: that's because it was written by kernel hackers | ||
| tcurtis | whiteknight: it appears to be working rather well for LuaJIT. | ||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: sha1 calculations need to be *really* fast | ||
| whiteknight | plus, even if you do optimize your assembly for one architecture, it won't likely be optimal on any other architecture | ||
| TimToady | I just had to optimize a wait-for-keystroke loop because each time through the loop was Too Slow⢠| ||
| dukeleto | TimToady++ | ||
| whiteknight | dukeleto: I know it needs to be fast. I say that your average programmer cannot produce code as optimal as your current-generation optimizing compilers can | 18:50 | |
| NotFound | TimToady: in this case it was in x86 assembler. | ||
| whiteknight | There are always exceptions, but few of them | ||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: you are preaching to the choir, dude :) | ||
| cotto_work | kernel and video codec hackers are some of the few people I'd believe capable of writing good hand-optimized assembly | ||
| whiteknight | I could sit down to a piece of code, and hand-optimize to reduce the number of instructions, but might screw up all the pipeline pairings | 18:51 | |
| or I could get all the pairings perfect, but completely thrash the branch predictor | |||
| and if the branch predictor is happy, the L2 cache starts missing like a mammajamma | |||
| dukeleto | plobsing: ping? Do you mind if I merge gsoc_nci ? | 18:52 | |
| dukeleto is really antsy to see that branch merged | |||
| Who is +1 to me merging gsoc_nci ? | |||
| whiteknight | trust me, an average human programmer is not going to optimize as much as a modern compiler will | ||
| +1 | |||
| NotFound | atrodo: I haven't measured but I guess that in order to out of memory winxed stage 0 you may need a source program of several MB. | ||
| whiteknight | </rant> | ||
| dalek | TT #1849 created by coke++: config failure post 2.10.0 | 18:53 | |
| TT #1849: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1849 | |||
| TT #1850 created by coke++: config failure post 2.10.0 | |||
| TT #1850: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1850 | |||
| Util | End of well-known story = Jr Pgmr: "but my version runs much faster than yours!" | ||
| Sr Pgmr: "Your version gets the answer wrong; if I do not have to get the right answer, then I can make it as fast as you want!" | 18:54 | ||
| dukeleto | uh oh. | ||
| cotto_work | dukeleto: I don't like it when you say that. | ||
| atrodo | www.xkcd.com/221/ | ||
| dukeleto | Coke's recent 2 tickets, looks like "git" is not installed | 18:55 | |
| many people without git will see that warning when they Configure | |||
| i don't think it stops the config, tho | |||
| seen Coke? | |||
| aloha | Coke was last seen in #parrot 3 days 5 hours ago joining the channel. | ||
| dukeleto | step auto::git_describe died during execution: Invalid git describe string (Git::Describe): RELEASE_2_10_0 at config/auto/git_describe.pm line 37. | 18:56 | |
| i see the problem. I can fix that. | |||
| tcurtis | I doubt that Coke pulled and rebuilt master without git installed. | ||
| dukeleto | tcurtis: how do you feel about me fixing something pointing the tag to a newer commit? | ||
| NotFound | Maye he's using git++ | ||
| dukeleto | no, there is an edgecase | ||
| i was wrong, git is installed, but our git describe code has a bug in it | 18:57 | ||
| tcurtis | dukeleto: I haven't made the announcement yet, so I guess it's not really officially 2.10.0 yet, so it's fine. | ||
| dukeleto | tcurtis: i meant "and pointing the tag to a newer commit" | ||
| tcurtis: give me 3 minutes to fix it and add a test | 18:58 | ||
| whiteknight | tcurtis++ # patience | ||
|
18:59
hudnix left,
mj41 left
|
|||
| tcurtis | I seem to have forgotten to update the ftp url in release.json. | 19:00 | |
| dalek | rrot: 4820ad5 | dukeleto++ | / (2 files): [config] Fix TT#1849, where a released versions git describe string was not recognized |
||
|
19:00
Coke joined
|
|||
| dukeleto | tcurtis: ok, i think that commit fixes Coke++'s issue | ||
| tcurtis: and adds a test for it :) | 19:01 | ||
| tcurtis: there may still be bugs in calculating git describe strings, where one is a release version, but that can be looked into later | |||
| Coke | dukeleto: we won't know until the next release tag. | 19:03 | |
| dukeleto | Coke: no, we can test things before that. | ||
| Coke: i think i just fixed your recent TT, in the most recent commit to master | |||
| Coke | but at least I can build now. BTW, that line for the config output is enormous. can probably remove "parrot's" from that output, since ... duh. | ||
| dukeleto | Coke: also, did the Config just warn, or actually die? | ||
| Coke: i would think it would only warn, but continue on. | 19:04 | ||
|
19:04
hercynium joined
|
|||
| Coke | dukeleto: it works now, but the git-describe string now has a sha1 at the end of it. | 19:04 | |
| dalek | rrot: 80d156e | tcurtis++ | tools/release/release.json: Fix ftp.path. |
||
| dukeleto | Coke: wait until tcurtis repoints the tag | ||
| tcurtis: do you feel comfortable with how to update where RELEASE_2_10_0 points ? | |||
| Coke | dukeleto: it warned, and then said "fix this before running make" | ||
| dukeleto | Coke: sure, but the config actually kept going. That is what I wanted to know. | ||
| Coke | the config ALWAYS keeps going. it's (*#&!@$ annoying. | 19:05 | |
| tcurtis | dukeleto: "git tag -f RELEASE_2_10_0" ? | ||
| dukeleto | tcurtis: yep, if you are on the latest master | ||
| tcurtis: you will then need "git push --tags --force" and then others will need "git fetch --tags" to get the new one | 19:06 | ||
| whiteknight | why --force? | ||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: we are changing where RELEASE_2_10_0 points | ||
| tcurtis | --force doesn't appear to be necessary for the push. | ||
| dukeleto | tcurtis: interesting. Did you push the tag? | 19:07 | |
| tcurtis | $ git push --tag | ||
| Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0) | |||
| To git@github.com:parrot/parrot.git | |||
| 7dbc0aa..80d156e RELEASE_2_10_0 -> RELEASE_2_10_0 | |||
| dukeleto | tcurtis: nice. looks like --force isn't necessary for updating tag locations. | ||
| Coke | still need the -tags to get the update tags on the pull/fetch | 19:08 | |
| now I'm getting: | |||
| dukeleto | tcurtis: you may want to send an email to parrot-dev and tell people they need "git fetch --tags", because git fetch will not pull down changed tags by default | ||
| Coke | init::manifest - Check MANIFEST.....................................done.Use of qw(...) as parentheses is deprecated at config/init/defaults.pm line 290. | ||
| Use of qw(...) as parentheses is deprecated at config/init/defaults.pm line 295. | |||
| dukeleto | Coke: that is odd. What is your "perl -v" ? | ||
| Coke | 5.13.6. ;) | 19:09 | |
| sorry, switched perl's in between. trying with 5.12 | |||
| dukeleto | Coke: lollerskates | ||
| dalek | TT #1851 created by coke++: invalid NAME section in config/auto/describe.pm | ||
| TT #1851: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1851 | |||
| hercynium | blogs.perl.org/users/rurban/2010/09...cated.html | ||
| dukeleto | tcurtis: i think you are good to cut the release now | ||
| hercynium | (in case it's helpful) | ||
| Coke | dukeleto: yup, my 1849 is fixed. | 19:10 | |
| dukeleto | hercynium: thanks | ||
| hercynium | hth | ||
| tcurtis | I'm getting a configure test failure in t/configure/063-git_describe_to_cache.t | 19:12 | |
| nopaste | "tcurtis" at 192.168.1.3 pasted "specifically, this failure" (4 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/25675 | ||
| dukeleto | tcurtis: doh! | 19:13 | |
| hercynium | tcurtis: you have a literal '-' in there | ||
| and none in the string | |||
| dukeleto | tcurtis: will fix, one sec | 19:14 | |
| Coke | dukeleto: fyi, I added "master" as a possible version to trac. | 19:15 | |
| so we now have trunk & master, which might be confusing. | |||
|
19:15
hudnix joined
|
|||
| dukeleto | Coke: danke, can you remove trunk ? | 19:15 | |
| dalek | rrot: 0eb237a | dukeleto++ | t/configure/063-git_describe_to_cache.t: [config][t] Fix a test relating to git describe strings |
||
| dukeleto | tcurtis: please test against on newest master | ||
| tcurtis: i should have run more tests before sending in the previous commits. My bad. | 19:16 | ||
| tcurtis: s/against/again/ | |||
| tcurtis | dukeleto: The test probably wouldn't have failed prior to me repointing the tag. | ||
| hercynium | heh, adding a ()? works too :) | ||
| Coke | dukeleto: removed. | 19:17 | |
| dukeleto | svn--, long live git++ # thanks Coke++ | ||
| whiteknight | Util++ # branch merge is good to go! | 19:28 | |
| dukeleto | tcurtis: how are things going? | 19:33 | |
| tcurtis | dukeleto: running fulltest on the new tarball (just in case). | ||
| dukeleto | tcurtis++ # making sure | 19:34 | |
| tcurtis | The tag is updated and the tarballs and checksums are uploaded, but I'm going to go eat lunch before I worry about the release announcements. | 19:38 | |
| dalek | rrot: 34916c7 | util++ | t (2 files): Merge branch 'master' of github.com:parrot/parrot |
||
| TT #1849 closed by coke++: config failure post 2.10.0 | 19:40 | ||
| TT #1849: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1849 | |||
| cotto_work | #ps in 45 | 19:46 | |
| dalek | rrot: 6d7ae9a | jkeenan++ | config/auto/git_describe.pm: Correct documentation error (TT #1851). |
19:54 | |
| TT #1851 closed by jkeenan++: invalid NAME section in config/auto/describe.pm | 19:56 | ||
| TT #1851: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1851 | |||
|
20:01
mj41 joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | When the gsoc_nci branch merges, I think I'll be able to get back into writing LAPACK bindings for PLA | 20:01 | |
| Util++ | 20:07 | ||
| Util: Where is the source of pbc_to_exe? | 20:08 | ||
| Util | tools/dev/pbc_to_exe.pir , or did you mean my NQP version? | 20:09 | |
| whiteknight | I didn't know about your NQP version | ||
| I though it was written in C. I didn't know it was PIR and bootstrapped | |||
|
20:09
mariano__ joined
20:10
bluescreen left
|
|||
| Util | whiteknight: The PIR program creates a C program and compiles it. I first mentioned my NQP version in #ps seconds before you queried, hence my confusion. | 20:11 | |
|
20:11
lucian left
20:12
mariano__ is now known as bluescreen
|
|||
| Util | (correction, I pre-typed my own notes about a NQP version, and will ask about it during #ps). | 20:13 | |
| whiteknight | :) | 20:14 | |
| dukeleto | Util: git pull --rebase is your friend :) | 20:19 | |
| Util: also, i like your merge announcement | 20:20 | ||
| Util | dukeleto: thanks, I know about `git pull --rebase`, and haven been using it on non-branch work, but... | 20:21 | |
| after I merged my branch into master on my laptop, rebasing failed, so regular pull/merge was my only option. | 20:22 | ||
| dukeleto | Util: i saw a "merge master" commit from you recently, so just wanted to make sure you know about it | ||
| Util: no worries :) | |||
| Util: i added more explanation of rebasing to github.com/parrot/parrot/blob/mast...nology.pod as well | |||
| Util | dukeleto: I appreciate your telling me. | 20:25 | |
| dukeleto is running tests on a gsoc_nci merge | |||
| Util | I read in some blog recently: `git rebase` should be called `git lie`. | ||
| dukeleto | Util: meh, that is half-right, but gives no context. | 20:26 | |
| Util | Funny though | ||
| Tene | dukeleto: --rebase is the default for pull these days, no? | ||
| tcurtis | www.parrot.org/news/2010/Parrot-2.10.0 | ||
| dukeleto | Do you want the history of your VCS to record exactly what *did* happen, or a historical narrative, which is a logical progression of "snapshots" in history? | ||
| tcurtis++ | |||
| dalek | website: tcurtis++ | Parrot 2.10.0 "Pesquet's" Released! | 20:28 | |
| website: www.parrot.org/news/2010/Parrot-2.10.0 | |||
| Util | tcurtis++ | ||
| tcurtis | Unfortunately, I don't have privileges to update the parrot.org/release/developer Anyone with that access around? | ||
|
20:29
lucian joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | I can take a look at it | 20:30 | |
| nevermind, I can't remember how to do it | 20:32 | ||
| Coke | tcurtis: you see adoughera's bug report? (release is borked) | ||
| (seems like that would have been caught during the release process testing...) | 20:33 | ||
| whiteknight: like 307 or so of the release manager guid. | 20:34 | ||
| *e | |||
| thought making tcurtis a drupal admin is better. | |||
| *though | |||
| mikehh | the release WFM | ||
| Coke | OH. perhaps doughera is using the initial tag. | ||
| mikehh | ain't it #ps time? | ||
| Coke | did that message ever go out? | ||
| allison | mikehh: should be | 20:35 | |
| tcurtis | Not yet. I was just about to send the release announcement. | ||
| allison | mikehh: the recent time-zone changes may still be confusing people | ||
| whiteknight | ah, i figured it out. I was looking at URL aliases, not URL redirects | 20:36 | |
| I got this | |||
| Coke | replied to andy's ticket. | ||
| whiteknight | tcurtis: what's the ftp link? | 20:37 | |
| Util | mikehh: Yes, it is #ps time. | ||
| dukeleto almost forgot about #ps. | |||
| tcurtis | whiteknight: ftp://ftp.parrot.org/pub/parrot/releases/devel/2.10.0/parrot-2.10.0.tar.gz | 20:38 | |
| Coke | tcurtis: is that from the new tag? | 20:39 | |
| whiteknight | done. | ||
| dukeleto | incoming! | ||
| dalek | rrot: 4fee2b0 | dukeleto++ | / (19 files): Merge branch 'gsoc_nci' Conflicts: \tMANIFEST \tMANIFEST.SKIP |
||
| tcurtis | Coke: Yes. | 20:40 | |
| allison idly wonders if the unicorn craze started before or after she subtitled her blog "here be unicorns" ;) | 20:42 | ||
| dukeleto | allison: much before. | ||
| allison | I must have picked up on it subliminally | ||
| is it like ponies? | 20:43 | ||
| dukeleto | allison: unicorns are quite big in the git and ruby communities. GitHub actually named a project "Unicorn" | ||
| allison | heh :) | ||
| sorear | github uses a giant unicorn picture for their 500 error page | ||
| dalek | TT #1852 created by doughera++: Configure.pl errors in 2.10.0 | ||
| TT #1852: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1852 | |||
|
20:44
PerlJam joined
|
|||
| allison | it is a lovely metaphor for things we believe possible, even if we have no proof yet | 20:44 | |
| Coke | boingboing: unicorn chaser. | ||
| NotFound | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invisible_Pink_Unicorn | 20:45 | |
| dukeleto | allison: github.com/blog/517-unicorn | 20:46 | |
| moderator | Parrot 2.10.0 Released | parrot.org | Log: irclog.perlgeek.de/parrot/today | Long live Git! github.com/parrot/parrot | git clone git://github.com/parrot/parrot.git | 20:46 | |
| mikehh | All tests PASS (pre/post-config, make corevm/make coretest, smoke (#1129) fulltest) at 6d7ae9a - Ubuntu 10.10 i386 (g++-4.5 with --optimize) | 20:48 | |
| Tene | I've only heard the term "unicorn chaser" in a rather different setting. | ||
| allison | dukeleto: nice! so it *is* like ponies :) | 20:49 | |
|
20:49
bacek_ is now known as bacek
|
|||
| dukeleto | allison: yes, unicorns and ponies are very close in the phylogenetic tree of open source mythical creatures :) | 20:50 | |
| atrodo | don't ponies exist? | 20:52 | |
| Tene | atrodo: djangopony.com/ -- not like that | ||
| allison | atrodo: there is such a thing as a pony, but a ponie is a mythical beast :) | 20:53 | |
| atrodo | I now understand. I think | ||
| allison | atrodo: confusingly, the plural is spelled the same | ||
|
20:57
donaldh joined
20:58
donaldh_ joined
|
|||
| NotFound | Yesterday I've seen in youtube a extract of a TV program with photos of real fairies. Looks like photos of UFO are out of trend. | 20:58 | |
|
20:59
donaldh__ joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: 27aa849 | jkeenan++ | t/codingstd/pmc_docs.t: [codingstd] One more file passes the pmc_docs.t requirements. |
21:03 | |
|
21:03
donaldh left,
donaldh__ is now known as donaldh
21:04
donaldh_ left
|
|||
| Coke | release tarball is borked for me too. | 21:08 | |
| trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1852 | |||
| that fairy thing is totally lifted from torchwood! | 21:09 | ||
| dukeleto | sadface. | ||
| do we need another release tarball? | |||
| NotFound | www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5WcpNd9K3s A bunch of fairy pictures, and a unicorn too | 21:10 | |
| Coke | I think having Configure.pl spit out nasty error messages is worth another tarball, yes. | ||
| dukeleto | why don't we have a test that catches that? What is the actual bug? | ||
| Coke | odd that it's working for mikehh. | ||
| dukeleto has to concentrate on $work, who can fix this? | 21:11 | ||
| Coke | dukeleto: if the tarball is working for tcurtis, presumably the test would have worked too. | ||
| mikehh | Coke - I was just testing the master branch, did not try the tarball | ||
| Coke | tcurtis: did you test the tarball before releasing it to the wild? | 21:12 | |
| tcurtis | Coke: I did. | ||
| Coke | or did you just test the master branch at that tag? | ||
| tcurtis: and you're not seeing those warnings in Configure.pl ? | |||
|
21:13
seanstickle joined
|
|||
| tcurtis | I didn't then, but I am now. It looks like I didn't see them then because I tested the tarball in a subdirectory of the parrot repo. | 21:14 | |
| dukeleto | tcurtis: ouch. That is a subtle bug. | 21:18 | |
| tcurtis: git walked up your directory tree and then Configure.pl did something different | |||
| tcurtis: we should disable git stuff in a release tarball, i guess | 21:23 | ||
| who knows how to do that? | |||
| mikehh | I tested the tarball it ran fine when I used perl Configure.pl --test but gave the errors when I ran it without --test | 21:25 | |
| dukeleto | how do we remove git checks in a release tarball? | 21:27 | |
| cotto_work | Presumably we had soemthing similar for svn | 21:28 | |
| Coke | other things check for -e "DEVELOPING", IIRC. | ||
|
21:28
jan left
|
|||
| dalek | tracwiki: v69 | cotto++ | ParrotQuotes | 21:30 | |
| tracwiki: maybe we should do a thing | |||
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/ParrotQ...ction=diff | |||
| mikehh | Yup, same story, works with perl Configure.pl --test but fails without the --test (I very rarely run without --test on the Configure so didn't pick it up | 21:32 | |
| so by running the pre-config tests it works - the tests must pull in something that it needs, but doesen't have without the tests | 21:37 | ||
|
21:51
spinclad joined
|
|||
| mikehh | see smoke #1132 - smolder.parrot.org/app/projects/rep...tails/1132 that's from the tarball | 21:51 | |
|
21:58
whiteknight left
|
|||
| mikehh | .parrot_current_git_describe and .parrot_current_sha1 just contain a newline (0x0a) | 21:58 | |
| During configuration the following steps failed: | 21:59 | ||
| dalek | rrot: 5604e92 | NotFound++ | t/pmc/string.t: test String to_int method with upper case hex |
||
| mikehh | 54: auto::sha1 | ||
| 55: auto::git_describe | |||
|
21:59
gert left
|
|||
| mikehh | the --test I get - During configuration the following steps failed: - 54: auto::sha1, 55: auto::git_describe | 22:00 | |
| with --test it builds and PASSes all tests through to fulltest | 22:02 | ||
| dukeleto | mikehh: i think that is correct. but maybe they shouldn't exist | ||
| mikehh: not sure. | |||
| mikehh | the first entry should read: without the --test I get - During configuration the following steps failed: - 54: auto::sha1, 55: auto::git_describe | 22:03 | |
| NotFound | winxed -e 'var s = new "String"; say(s.is_integer("+"));' ==> 1 This is by design? | 22:05 | |
| POD doc says: "Checks if the ascii STRING C<str> is just an integer." | 22:06 | ||
| Bare "+" or "-" aren't integers in my mind. | 22:07 | ||
|
22:28
plobsing_ joined,
fperrad left
|
|||
| plobsing_ | dukeleto++ # gsoc_nci merge | 22:28 | |
| GeJ | seconded. | ||
|
22:28
bacek left
|
|||
| GeJ | dukeleto++ (karma accounting) | 22:30 | |
| Tene | (++)++ | 22:32 | |
|
22:32
mj41 left
|
|||
| dukeleto | So is our 2.10.0 tarball still broke? | 22:50 | |
| Do we need to put out a 2.10.1 ? What is the consensus ? | |||
| We already told people what 2.10.0 sha1's are. I think that ship has sailed. | 22:51 | ||
| NotFound | I'm testing svn to github migration, can someone clone this github.com/NotFound/winxed ? | 22:55 | |
| dukeleto | NotFound: git clone? | 22:58 | |
| NotFound: fatal: github.com/NotFound/winxed/info/refs not found: did you run git update-server-info on the server? | |||
| NotFound: you are missing a .git | 22:59 | ||
| NotFound | dukeleto: ups, that was the web. | 23:00 | |
|
23:00
tcurtis left
|
|||
| NotFound | git://github.com/NotFound/winxed.git | 23:00 | |
| dukeleto | NotFound: git clone works fine | 23:01 | |
| NotFound | Is the import from svn that github allows at repository creation time. | 23:03 | |
| Looks fine. | |||
| dukeleto | NotFound: cool! | 23:06 | |
| NotFound | Just a test for a now, I've not yet decided what to do. | 23:08 | |
|
23:08
plobsing_ left
|
|||
| jnthn | Anyone know off hand what dynoplib the printerr op got shuffled off to? | 23:19 | |
| cotto_work | io.ops | 23:24 | |
| (the dynops version) | |||
| jnthn | Thanks, just found it myself too :) | ||
|
23:47
lucian left
|
|||
| GeJ | for those of us with the wrong timezones, what happened with the 2.10.0 tarball? | 23:49 | |
| cotto_work | apparently it doesn't know how to deal with not being a git repo | 23:50 | |
| GeJ | at config time I presume. | 23:51 | |
| cotto_work | yes | 23:52 | |
| If you have the tuits to fix it, we need to do so and get a new tarball out as soon as we can. | |||
|
23:53
donaldh left
23:55
dmalcolm left
|
|||