|
Parrot 2.11.0 Released | parrot.org | Log: irclog.perlgeek.de/parrot/today | Keep up with GCI Set by moderator on 5 January 2011. |
|||
| dukeleto | NotFound: what is the problem? | 00:01 | |
| NotFound | dukeleto: support.github.com/discussions/repo...ail-200-ok | 00:03 | |
| dukeleto | NotFound: sadface | 00:05 | |
|
00:21
mikehh joined
|
|||
| dukeleto | Yuki`N: see github.com/parrot/parrot/pull/117 , bitops still fail | 00:22 | |
| Yuki`N | Can anyone give me SSH access to a 64-bit machine? | 00:26 | |
| mikehh | Yuki`N: No, but I just booted into Kubuntu 10.10 amd64, what do you need | 00:28 | |
| Yuki`N | I need an environment to run some tests, hmm. | ||
| Like changing one line and seeing the result. | |||
| mikehh | what you got at the moment? | 00:30 | |
| Yuki`N | Nothing so far. | ||
| Still thinking. | |||
| mikehh | what platform are you running on? | 00:31 | |
| Yuki`N | i686. | 00:36 | |
|
00:39
fbrito left
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: 9bbcc27 | nwellnhof++ | / (2 files): [io] Seek back when switching from buffered read to write Also fix writing in append mode and optimize a little. |
00:40 | |
|
00:44
contingencyplan left
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: 80145c1 | nwellnhof++ | t/pmc/filehandle.t: [t] Fix tempfile name |
00:47 | |
| Yuki`N | mikehh, can you try running `prove t/dynoplibs/bit.t` with my latest master, git://github.com/nol888/parrot | 00:50 | |
| If that doesn't work I'll have to do it at work tomorrow when I have access to a 64-bit machine. | |||
| mikehh | Yuki`N: cloning it now | 00:55 | |
|
00:55
whiteknight joined
|
|||
| Coke | smolder.parrot.org/app/projects/rep...tails/2164 | 01:03 | |
| Yuki`N | Ok I have no idea why that would not pass on Mac. | 01:06 | |
| Passes on windows and linux i386 | 01:07 | ||
| mikehh | Yuki`N: passes for me | 01:09 | |
| Yuki`N | Cool. | ||
| mikehh | Yuki`N: btw you have a codetest failure in it - for( needs to be for ( | ||
| Yuki`N | Ah. | ||
| I'll just amend and force-push | 01:10 | ||
| mikehh | Failed Failed test 'there should be at least one space between a C keyword and any subsequent open parenthesis | ||
| t/codingstd/c_parens.t | 01:12 | ||
| Yuki`N | Ok my amend didn't turn out too well so I just made a separate commit and updated the pull request. | 01:13 | |
|
01:15
fbrito joined
|
|||
| dukeleto | Yuki`N: danke, will look at it soon | 01:23 | |
| fbrito | Ah, I am stuck with my pbc_dump task :( www.google-melange.com/gci/task/sho...9452036881 | 01:47 | |
|
01:48
whiteknight left
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: 84ba5a6 | nwellnhof++ | / (2 files): [io] Fix bugs in Parrot_io_seek_buffer |
01:50 | |
| dukeleto | fbrito: what is up? | 01:58 | |
| fbrito: is there stuff that is uncoverable? | 01:59 | ||
| fbrito | I am having problems trying to cover lines 267-294: tapir2.ro.vutbr.cz/cover/latest-c_c...ump-c.html | ||
| dukeleto | fbrito: what is your coverage currently? | 02:00 | |
| fbrito | only 69.3%, haha | ||
| plobsing | fbrito: what sections are you having trouble covering? | 02:01 | |
| dalek | rrot: 8dd8476 | nwellnhof++ | include/parrot/api.h: Run make headerizer |
||
| rrot: 6acab19 | nwellnhof++ | / (4 files): [io] Remove file_size attribute from FileHandle It wasn't implemented and it's a value that can't be cached. |
|||
| dukeleto | fbrito: will be back soon. Try creating PMCs of different types, so the bytecode has various stuff to dump | ||
| fbrito | plobsing: cases with "KEY_register_flag" (line 267-294) | 02:02 | |
| plobsing | oh keys. those are fun | 02:03 | |
| and by fun I mean the opposite | |||
| fbrito | case KEY_string_FLAG: and case KEY_integer_FLAG: was really easy to cover with a hash | ||
| Yuki`N | 'Night all. | ||
| nwellnhof | wasn't there a proposal to remove keys? | ||
| fbrito | Yuki`N: good night :) | ||
|
02:03
Yuki`N left
|
|||
| fbrito | case KEY_number_FLAG: is still uncovered, like the cases with KEY_register_FLAG: | 02:04 | |
| plobsing | nwellnhof: yes, by bacek IIRC | 02:05 | |
| fbrito: try using strings and floating point values in hash accessors | |||
| fbrito | when trying to use floating points values I get "error:imcc:build_key: unknown set" | 02:06 | |
| plobsing | interesting | ||
| yep, looks like IMCC won't build keys using floating point values (a good thing IMHO) | 02:07 | ||
| fbrito | for example: $P0 = new ['Hash']; $P0[1.0] = 1; will raise the build_key error | 02:08 | |
| plobsing | I wonder if I could remove all support for floating point values in keys without anything breaking. | ||
| fbrito: sure, but consider what floating point keys would mean. | 02:09 | ||
| $P0[1.0] = 'good'; $P0[0.9999999999999] = 'bad'; say $P0[1.0] | |||
| worse, what happens when those are the same in 32-bit but different in 64-bit | 02:10 | ||
| fbrito | oh yes, it looks pretty bad :P | ||
| so... I am still left with the cases checking for KEY_register_FLAG | 02:15 | ||
| I saw that Key PMC has a method called 'set_register', but I am not sure how it works | |||
| plobsing | fbrito: I am currently attempting to remove floatval keys altogether. that should boost your coverage, and since you brought it up, go ahead and take some credit. | 02:17 | |
| fbrito | I am waiting for cover_new results | 02:20 | |
| from 50% to 77.2%. Still really far from the 95% that the task requested | 02:22 | ||
|
02:22
mikegrb left
|
|||
| fbrito | that was a very mean task :P. increase code coverage by 45%? :o | 02:22 | |
| plobsing | you are getting close tho | 02:23 | |
| fbrito | but unfortunately I have to go now :(. have to write some really important tests tomorrow | 02:24 | |
| ahahah, any chance of having a task split by 2? :P | 02:31 | ||
|
02:31
stilgar joined
|
|||
| stilgar | fbrito: submit your task | 02:36 | |
| plobsing | fbrito: how much coverage would you gain if the numval key portions were gone? I am currently halfway through fulltest with everything good so far. | 02:37 | |
| stilgar | fbrito: i will redefine the task and plobsing is removing stuff | 02:38 | |
| fbrito | Code coverage was 50% when the task was created. I could only cover string and int keys, which increased it to 69.3%. Removing numval key portions increased it to 77.2% | 02:39 | |
| My biggest problem are the key "switch cases" that check for KEY_(integer, string, pmc)_FLAG | KEY_register_FLAG | 02:40 | ||
| stilgar | fbrito: this is dukeleto, btw | ||
| fbrito | ahhh :P | ||
| stilgar | plobsing: +1 to remove numval keys | 02:41 | |
| fbrito: create an Iterator pmc and dump it | 02:42 | ||
| dalek | rrot: 3cd107c | plobsing++ | / (8 files): eliminate floating point key values IMCC refuses to create these, so they are not yet in use and there are no compelling/sane examples of where this might be useful |
02:43 | |
| stilgar is dukeleto's phone | |||
| plobsing | fbrito: those should be fairly easy. just use $I0, $S0, and $P0 registers | 02:44 | |
| fbrito | plobsing: I have tried that, but it didn't work | 02:46 | |
| Is there any other way of doing that? I have tried $I0 = 1; $P0[$I0] = 1 | |||
| plobsing | thats odd. hmmm... maybe you have to use them in complex keys? | ||
| dalek | rrot: dce9186 | nwellnhof++ | t/pmc/filehandle.t: [t] Test multibyte chars split across buffers |
02:47 | |
| plobsing | eg: $P0[$I0;$I1] | ||
| $P0[$I0] maps to get_x_keyed_int and doesn't use a key at all | |||
| fbrito | ah, genius! | ||
| but it didn't work for case "KEY_pmc_FLAG | KEY_register_FLAG". I get the same "error:imcc:build_key: wrong register set" error | 02:50 | ||
| plobsing | try just $P0[$P1] | ||
| Based on looking at key.pmc, I'm fairly sure PMCs aren't supported in complex keys. | 02:51 | ||
| there's nowhere in the struct to hold them | |||
| stilgar | fbrito: some stuff is uncoverable. submit your task before you go to sleep and explain | 02:53 | |
| fbrito | the code worked, but it was mapped to something else | ||
| plobsing | :( | 02:54 | |
| fbrito | let me run cover_new for the last time | ||
| stilgar | fbrito: and good luck on your exams!!! | ||
| plobsing | is there a concise document on what a package developer has to do to get into plumage? | 02:56 | |
| I see the matadata segment in the ModuleEcosystem page, but how does that metadata get picked up? | |||
| stilgar | plobsing: plumage has a json file for each project | 03:01 | |
| plobsing | stilgar: so it does. thanks. | 03:03 | |
| cotto | dukeleto, ping | 03:05 | |
| stilgar | cotto: pong | 03:08 | |
| cotto | stilgar, you're dukeleto? | 03:09 | |
| mikehh | cotto: btw I think fixed that problem you had with html_cleanup, cab you check it out? | ||
| can | 03:10 | ||
| cotto | mikehh, youdid | ||
| thanks | |||
| ENOSPACE | |||
| ;} | |||
| stilgar | cotto: yes sir :) Stilgar is Duke Leto's right hand man in Dune and is also my phone | ||
| cotto | I feel like I should have known that. | 03:11 | |
| but now I do, so it works out | |||
| stilgar, see privmsg | 03:14 | ||
| Matt221 | can someone approve this: www.google-melange.com/gci/task/sho...0353#c3001 | 03:15 | |
| cotto | on it | ||
| done | |||
| Matt221 | github.com/parrot/parrot/pull/118 | 03:16 | |
| cotto wonders how it's not valid to initialize a complex with a boxed int | 03:18 | ||
| Matt221, approved. We can pull/merge later. | 03:20 | ||
| Matt221 | cotto: thanks! | ||
| fbrito | can someone please accept my claim request on this? www.google-melange.com/gci/task/sh...9452036881 | 03:21 | |
|
03:21
nwellnhof left
|
|||
| plobsing | fbrito: OOC, what's your coverage at now? | 03:22 | |
| fbrito | 86% -.-. but "case KEY_pmc_FLAG | KEY_register_FLAG:" also seems invalid | 03:23 | |
| plobsing | that's not quite as easy a sell as number keys, but worth considering | 03:26 | |
| fbrito | maybe we can split the task in 2 2-points 20% tasks | 03:27 | |
|
03:31
Matt221 left
|
|||
| fbrito | anyway... I really should go to bed | 03:33 | |
| stilgar | fbrito: 86% is close enough | ||
| fbrito: submit task and sleep! | 03:34 | ||
| fbrito | stilgar: are you sure? | 03:35 | |
| what do you think, cotto? | |||
| cotto | . o O ("") | ||
| I'll halve the task. | 03:36 | ||
| wait. which task? | |||
| plobsing | he did 77%. that deserves at least 3 of the 4 points | ||
| cotto | nm. you mentioned it | ||
| stilgar | cotto: the task was a bit too hard | 03:37 | |
| cotto | plobsing, it rounds up | ||
| stilgar | fbrito: submit and we will figure it out | ||
|
03:38
fbrito left,
fbrito joined
|
|||
| fbrito | if I did only 77% of the task I think it would be better to get 2 points instead of 4 | 03:42 | |
| plobsing | are you arguing against points assigned to yourself? | ||
| fbrito | yes... I wouldn't like if someone else had received "free" points | 03:45 | |
| and I have to sleep :D | |||
| cotto | fbrito++ | 03:47 | |
| definitely appreciate the ethic | |||
| fbrito | hehee, too bad that there aren't tasks to increase the ethic coverage :P | 03:48 | |
| cotto | fbrito, I can help get this straightened out now. | 03:49 | |
| If you unaccept the task, I can edit it to match what you were able to do. | |||
| fbrito | just did that :) | 03:50 | |
| cotto | fixed | ||
| accepted | 03:52 | ||
| fbrito, submit and I'll make sure it gets reviewed before the deadline. If you don't want to do any more tasks, you can go to bed. | 03:53 | ||
| fbrito | ok, thank you very much :) | 03:54 | |
| Kapace | cotto: I might have to do the same as fbrito | ||
| cotto | Kapace, ok | ||
| Kapace | can't reach the last few % | ||
| cotto | Kapace, how far off are you? | ||
| Kapace | making cover right now.. tell you in a bit | 03:55 | |
| cotto | ok | ||
| fbrito | ok, work submitted. going to bed | 03:56 | |
| cotto | fbrito, 'night | ||
| fbrito | I hope I can keep contributing to Parrot, but now without the GCI pressure :) | 03:58 | |
| cotto | fbrito, why does your pull add some code and then delete it? | ||
| fbrito | really? | 03:59 | |
| cotto | github.com/fernandobrito/parrot/co...b37f2a2701 | ||
| fbrito | the pull request has 2 commits: I added them on the first commit and moved them to it own test on the second commit | 04:02 | |
| cotto | ok | 04:03 | |
| fbrito | hm... actually the 1st commit is useless | ||
| I should have used "--amend" | 04:04 | ||
| should I fix it? | |||
| Kapace | cotto: well, It's kinda strange, I have 89.1% and thats with Matt's earlier work | 04:06 | |
| there is also one function which seem to hang when I call it | |||
| cotto | fbrito, unless it changes the overall diff, don't bother. | ||
| we can have a few messy commits. Git deals. | 04:07 | ||
| fbrito | ok | ||
| cotto | Kapace, so you're saying that you're not seeing an apparent increase in coverage? | ||
|
04:07
fbrito left
|
|||
| Kapace | hmm, well | 04:09 | |
| yes, It does increase, but I can't get it probably any higher than like 90.. | |||
| (the latest cover seems to cover some lines that aren't in my report) | 04:10 | ||
| cotto | Are you using fullcover? that's what tapir2 uses | 04:11 | |
| Kapace | oh, I'll try that (i was doing cover_new) | ||
| cotto | I can't follow the proliferation of cover targets. | 04:12 | |
| Kapace | fullcover didn't work for me, bunch of errors, and only reports a couple files etc.. | 04:32 | |
| Anyways, there seems to be some lines that would never execute and some methods that hang/fail | |||
| cotto | charming | 04:35 | |
| are your changes available to play with? | 04:36 | ||
| I can try to get some coverage results. | |||
| Kapace | pushing... | 04:37 | |
| cotto | I'd hate for you to get knocked out of the top 10 over something stupid like that. | 04:38 | |
| Kapace | pretty sure I'm out anyways :( | 04:39 | |
| sucks that I couldn't work on more tasks today.. | |||
| cotto | actually you'll be in if you get any more points and none of the other people you're tied with do. | 04:40 | |
| barring disqualifications and other post-contest changes | 04:41 | ||
| Kapace | hmm, I need 101+ points now | ||
| cotto | indeed | 04:42 | |
| that changed quickly | |||
| dalek | TT #1943 created by doughera++: Failure due to missing external definition of inlined functions | 04:50 | |
| TT #1943: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1943 | |||
| Kapace | oh forgot to link to my code: github.com/kapace/parrot/commit/83...9d1a3dd86f | 04:51 | |
| not my proudest stuff here :/ | |||
| cotto | running coverage tests now. It'll be a while | 04:55 | |
| Kapace | ok thanks, cotto | ||
| oh, and I brought my can of applause | |||
| I should wait until it's over :P | |||
| so pirate is python on parrot? I'll probably want to look at that later | 04:57 | ||
| cotto | Kapace, that pirate is defunct. Pynie is the current Python on Parrot implementation. PIRATE is a PIR->pbc compiler written in nqp-rx. | 04:59 | |
| Kapace, I see about a 10% increase. | 05:16 | ||
| Kapace | alright, so theres one method that when I try to call it, it hangs | 05:19 | |
| line 134, load_lib | |||
| but other than that, I can't cover 167 since if the opcode is invalid an exception is raised before tapir2.ro.vutbr.cz/cover/latest-c_c...t-pmc.html | 05:21 | ||
| cotto | Kapace, that method is in the wrong place. I'm going to delete it. | 05:24 | |
| bacek_at_work | Kapace, remove lines 167-170. PackfileOpMap never return -1. | ||
| cotto | PackfileOpMap is responsible for loading libraries | ||
| Kapace | oh ok | ||
| bacek_at_work | cotto, no. Please keep method here :) | 05:25 | |
| cotto | ok. | ||
| It should be more paranoid though. I'll add a null check for the opmap. | |||
| bacek_at_work | op_map is created in .init | 05:26 | |
| You don't have to check it all the time | |||
| cotto | wait. How does PFBCS.load_lib even work? It looks like it calls itself in an infinite loop. | ||
| bacek_at_work | Ah. This one should be killed | 05:27 | |
| Line 167 is from .push_pmc | |||
| cotto, I added .opmap and call PFBCS.opmap.load_lib() | 05:28 | ||
| We can add shortcut here but I don't think it's necessary. | |||
| cotto | on phone. bbs | 05:30 | |
| dalek | rrot: d3e1e52 | bacek++ | t/pmc/float.t: Bump Float PMC test coverage to 100%. |
05:37 | |
| cotto | bacek++ | 05:43 | |
|
05:45
rurban_ joined
|
|||
| Kapace | whats the most violent way to kill a proccess? -9? | 05:45 | |
| cotto | bacek_at_work, is pfbcs.load_lib really broken or am I missing something? | 05:46 | |
| Kapace, yes | |||
|
05:46
khairul joined,
khairul left
05:48
rurban left,
rurban_ is now known as rurban
|
|||
| Kapace | it won't die!! | 05:48 | |
| cotto | 11 (SEGV) might work | 05:49 | |
| but it might be a zombie | |||
| plobsing | find the parent, kill the parent, somewhere along the line something will handle its child processes appropriately. that's all init really does. | 05:54 | |
| Kapace | ended up unplugging the device, process then died, although ^ would be better | 05:56 | |
| plobsing | that works too I guess | 05:58 | |
| bacek_at_work | cotto, yes, it's broken. Just kill it | 06:00 | |
| Kapace | can i do the killing? | ||
| bacek_at_work | Kapace, go for ti | 06:02 | |
| Kapace | cool: github.com/kapace/parrot/commit/d9...cb564dafde | 06:05 | |
| cotto | Kapace, you need to send in a cla so we can get you a commit bit | 06:07 | |
| Kapace | meh, I probably won't commiting too much, just every now and then | 06:08 | |
| plus I like the extra eyes going over my code :) | |||
| cotto: that gets coverage up to 95.9 | 06:11 | ||
| plobsing | Kapace: don't worry, more people read parrot's commits than you'd think | ||
| Kapace | actually in the latest result, one more line is covered | ||
| cotto | Kapace, great. Submit your task and we'll call it complete. | 06:12 | |
| Eliminating useless code is a valid way to increase coverage. | 06:14 | ||
| Kapace | ok done.. | 06:15 | |
| cotto | and done | 06:16 | |
| Kapace, did load_lib hang instead of segfaulting? | 06:17 | ||
| Kapace | yes | ||
| well, prove kills it after 3 seconds, but make test just hanged | |||
| plobsing | is there a way to have an exception handler pass an exception upwards to the next exception handler while maintaining the original backtrace? | 06:18 | |
| cotto | tco ftw | ||
| plobsing | I have difficulty classifying that as a "win" | 06:20 | |
|
06:21
contingencyplan joined
|
|||
| cotto | well, the tco worked, even if it was for a stupid use case. | 06:22 | |
| plobsing | a segfault would have been a better way of failing | 06:24 | |
| but I do like that we are stackless in some sense | 06:26 | ||
| cotto | yeah | ||
| Kapace, let me know if you want to try any other tasks | 06:28 | ||
| Kapace | actually yeah | ||
| I was just thinking | |||
| but I'm not sure which | 06:29 | ||
| cotto | the Class task looks like the most valuable point-wise | ||
| Kapace | but I doubt I have the time for it, way too many lines | 06:30 | |
| im thinking the research task | |||
| (since its easy, shouldn't been too in depth?) | 06:31 | ||
| cotto | looking at removing auto::jit would be helpful | 06:32 | |
| Kapace | I was thinking mappedbytearry, but that too | ||
| cotto | plobsing, nice addition on debugging random failures. I think we should have a separate file that kind of info, though. | 06:34 | |
| NotFound | Kapace: mappedbytearray coverage can be tricky, there is a lot of #ifdef in it | 06:37 | |
| Kapace | NotFound: oh, its not a coverage task, its the research one | ||
| for mappedbytearray on windows | |||
| NotFound | Sorry, I'm just awakening :O | 06:38 | |
| cotto | plobsing++ for nuking num keys | 06:42 | |
| that removes a nice chunk of confusing and misleading code | 06:44 | ||
|
07:20
contingencyplan left
|
|||
| dukeleto | ~~ | 07:23 | |
| 37 minutes until GCI is over! | |||
| cotto | quite the wild ride | ||
| dukeleto | cotto: indeed :) | 07:26 | |
|
07:27
stilgar left
|
|||
| cotto | msg nwellnhof In your platform_src branch, shouldn't auto::platform fail if there's no appropriate file for a platform? | 07:29 | |
| aloha | OK. I'll deliver the message. | ||
| dukeleto | Kapace: howdy | 07:33 | |
| Kapace: you working on a task? | |||
| kapace_ | dukeleto, hey there | 07:42 | |
| dukeleto, not really, gave up.. | |||
| dukeleto | kapace_: no! there is still time... | 07:46 | |
| kapace_ | not enough :/ | ||
| cotto | dukeleto, be nice | ||
| I'm not sure I'd accept a gci task done in 14 minutes. | |||
| dukeleto | cotto: yeah, i guess your right | ||
| kapace_: you did some awesome work, and I hope you stick around :) | 07:47 | ||
| cotto too | |||
| dukeleto | kapace_: also, definitely apply to Google Summer of Code | ||
| kapace_ | yeah, just have to catch up with school work | ||
| dukeleto, thanks, I will definetly try | |||
| dukeleto | kapace_: and if you need a letter of recommendation or something, just ask | ||
| kapace_ | right, well this seems about the right time.. | 07:48 | |
| I'd like to thanks the mentors of Parrot for GCi | |||
| dukeleto | It is interesting to see the GCI tasks that didn't get finished. | ||
| kapace_ | cotto, dukeleto to name a few | ||
| I have learned a lot and it has been a great expirience :) | |||
| kapace_ opens the can of canned applause | 07:49 | ||
| cotto | kapace_, you're welcome. | ||
| dukeleto | kapace_: i must say, you GCI students blew away my expectations | 07:50 | |
| cotto | kapace_, if you're bored, you can completely rip out share_ro in your branch. I'm fairly sure it has no redeeming value. | ||
| tadzik | wow, there aren't too many remaining tasks | ||
| kapace_ | cotto, yeah sounds like a good idea | 07:51 | |
| dukeleto | +1 to killing share_ro | ||
| kapace_ | ill try to get to it tommrow, just going to hang around for 9 minutes and fall asleep | ||
| tadzik | now, where did the t-shirt tasks go? | 07:52 | |
| dukeleto | tadzik: they got completed, but they weren't great | ||
| cotto | yeah. I don't think we'll be doing those again next year. | ||
| tadzik | hmm, I didn't even get any notice, weird | ||
| cotto | Melange is wonky on all fronts. | 07:53 | |
| bacek | aloha, humans | ||
| tadzik | o/ | ||
| dukeleto | looks like bit dynops tests are still failing on 64bit | 07:54 | |
| tadzik | nevertheless, I plan to complete the remaining code-related GCI task after it's over ;) | ||
| dukeleto | cotto: yeah, melange usually goes down around any deadline | ||
| cotto | dukeleto, it was a general statement | ||
| It actually doesn't look much worse than normal atm. | 07:55 | ||
| dukeleto | cotto: purely by chance :) | 07:57 | |
| cotto | likely as not | ||
| kapace_ | well, Good night #parrot, see you again soon | 08:00 | |
| cotto | 'night kapace_ | 08:01 | |
| tadzik | 'night | ||
| GCI's over? | |||
| cotto | 2 minutes ago | ||
| dukeleto | GCI is Done. | ||
| and we survived, to boot. | 08:02 | ||
| rfw | thanks cotto, dukeleto and everyone at #parrot for GCI :D | 08:05 | |
| cotto | rfw, thanks for being insanely productive | 08:06 | |
| rfw | cotto: i hope you have nice dreams about me now, instead of nightmares or sandwiches | ||
| cotto | ... | 08:07 | |
| rfw | what, let me find it | ||
| cotto | a waffle sandwich sounds pretty good | ||
| I know what you're talking about. | |||
| rfw | oh good | ||
| i thought i scared you | |||
| dukeleto | mmmm, waffles. | 08:12 | |
| dukeleto goes to sleep | |||
| cotto | 'night | 08:18 | |
| dalek | rrot/nqp_pct: 2e20a9f | bacek++ | compilers/pct/src/POST/ (3 files): Move %!paramfmt into Sub.pm |
08:19 | |
| rrot/nqp_pct: ea734bc | bacek++ | compilers/pct/src/POST/ (3 files): Quick hack to move last method into Sub.pm |
|||
| rrot/nqp_pct: cf6de38 | bacek++ | compilers/pct/ (4 files): Add POST::Ops.pm |
|||
| rrot/nqp_pct: 82b83fd | bacek++ | compilers/pct/ (4 files): Split POST/Nodes.pir with only includes of other .pir files |
|||
| rrot/nqp_pct: e3d865b | bacek++ | compilers/pct/src/POST/Node.p (2 files): Migrate POST::Node to NQP |
|||
| cotto | reparrot.blogspot.com/2011/01/thank...dents.html | 08:23 | |
| bacek | cotto++ # good post | 08:43 | |
| cotto | thanks. now, sleep | 08:45 | |
|
08:49
fperrad joined
09:01
theory left
09:27
rfw left
10:39
wagle left
11:04
whiteknight joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: 9b4a1f2 | mikehh++ | include/parrot/key.h: run make headerizer to fix missing ASSERT_ARGS (removed functions) |
11:32 | |
| mikehh | getting some test failures (64 bit) - t/dynoplibs/bit.t - Failed tests: 136-137, 139 and t/library/sha.t - Failed tests: 1-6 | 11:36 | |
|
11:59
whiteknight left
12:25
mikehh left
|
|||
| Coke | I had mikehh's failure's also. | 12:26 | |
| dalek | p-rx: cb33a76 | bacek++ | src/setting/ResizablePMCArray.pm: Remove redundant pirop signatures. PAST::Compiler is smart enough to handle it as is. |
12:36 | |
| p-rx: f11a416 | bacek++ | / (2 files): Properly handle unscoped multi methods/subs |
|||
| p-rx: b1a8289 | bacek++ | src/stage0/ (4 files): Rebootstrap files |
12:38 | ||
| rrot: 420c909 | bacek++ | ext/nqp-rx/src/stage0/ (4 files): Update nqp-rx with fixes for unscoped multi methods handling |
12:39 | ||
|
12:40
mikehh joined
12:45
bacek left
13:03
woosley joined
13:09
bacek joined
|
|||
| bacek | *incoming* | 13:12 | |
| dalek | rrot/nqp_pct: 9b4a1f2 | mikehh++ | include/parrot/key.h: run make headerizer to fix missing ASSERT_ARGS (removed functions) |
||
| rrot/nqp_pct: 92f00a2 | bacek++ | compilers/pct/ (4 files): Start moving POST::Compiler to nqp |
|||
| rrot/nqp_pct: 70bcb32 | bacek++ | compilers/pct/src/POST/Compiler (3 files): .hll_pir |
|||
| rrot/nqp_pct: 631fe33 | bacek++ | compilers/pct/src/POST/Compiler (2 files): .escape & .key_pir |
|||
| rrot/nqp_pct: 81a7569 | bacek++ | compilers/pct/src/POST/Compiler (3 files): .to_pir |
|||
| rrot/nqp_pct: 15e18c7 | bacek++ | compilers/pct/src/POST/Compiler (3 files): .pir_children |
|||
| rrot/nqp_pct: 3b9fbf3 | bacek++ | compilers/pct/src/POST/Compiler (3 files): .pir(Any) |
|||
| rrot/nqp_pct: 420c909 | bacek++ | ext/nqp-rx/src/stage0/ (4 files): Update nqp-rx with fixes for unscoped multi methods handling |
|||
| rrot/nqp_pct: 848164d | bacek++ | / (98 files): Merge branch 'master' into nqp_pct |
|||
| rrot/nqp_pct: ce81731 | bacek++ | compilers/pct/src/POST/ (25 files): Remove useless 'our' from multimethods |
|||
| rrot/nqp_pct: 13d69fc | bacek++ | compilers/pct/src/POST/Compiler (3 files): .pir(Op) and .pir(Label) |
|||
| rrot/nqp_pct: f7efe98 | bacek++ | compilers/pct/src/POST/Compiler (3 files): .pir(Sub) |
|||
| rrot/nqp_pct: c4417e6 | bacek++ | compilers/pct/ (5 files): Final switch POST::Compiler to 'nqp' version |
|||
| bacek | seen pmichaud | 13:17 | |
| aloha | pmichaud was last seen in #perl6 2 days 11 hours ago saying "excellent.". | ||
| moritz | does rakudo work on the nqp_pct branch? | ||
| bacek | moritz, dunno. But it should be. I didn't introduce new functionality (yet) | 13:19 | |
| moritz | would be a good test case :-) | ||
| bacek | running "git pull & make test" now :) | 13:20 | |
| moritz tries | |||
| bacek | moritz, if you are bored you can actually convert POST::Compiler to nqp. I kinda cheated :) | 13:21 | |
| moritz | bacek: no boredom here | ||
| bacek | sigh... When we can have next GCI? | ||
|
13:25
Drossel joined,
Kulag left
|
|||
| Coke tries to imagine pmichaud saying "excellent" in the smithers voice and fails. | 13:29 | ||
| bacek: how you doing? | |||
| bacek | Coke, much better than on 1st of January :) | 13:31 | |
| holy... It's 12:30 already. Good night, folks. Time to get some sleep. | 13:33 | ||
| mikehh | All tests PASS (pre/post-config, make corevm/make coretest, smoke (#2175) fulltest) at 2_11_0-905-g420c909 - Ubuntu 10.10 i386 (g++-4.5) | 13:37 | |
| Coke | good night, robot. | 13:40 | |
| mikehh | Coke: can you have a look at html_cleanup branch, I think it's ready to merge | 13:42 | |
| arnsholt | Coke: I think the reason is that it's Mr. Burns that says "eeeeexcellent", not Smithers ;) | ||
| moritz | bacek: t/spec/S06-advanced_subroutine_features/recurse.rakudo faisl 8 tests with rakudo on pct_nqp branch | ||
| Coke | arnsholt: brain-o. | 13:44 | |
| arnsholt | I figured =) | ||
|
13:44
darbelo joined
|
|||
| mikehh got to go out for a spell - bbl | 13:45 | ||
|
13:45
rurban_ joined
13:48
rurban left,
rurban_ is now known as rurban
|
|||
| moritz | bacek: lots of failures actually | 13:51 | |
|
14:00
contingencyplan joined
14:16
whiteknight joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | good morning, #parrot | 14:16 | |
|
14:16
krunen left
14:17
krunen joined
14:18
plobsing left
14:19
Drossel left,
Kulag joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | msg moritz: when you get a chance can you review TT #1833? We've changed the error message and I want to see if it satisfies your requirements. | 14:29 | |
| aloha | OK. I'll deliver the message. | ||
| whiteknight | msg cotto can you look at TT #1298 and see if it is still worth doing? I suspect it is not, but I don't want to close it as WONTFIX without a second set of eyes. | 14:32 | |
| aloha | OK. I'll deliver the message. | ||
| dalek | TT #1091 closed by whiteknight++: ExceptionHandlers should be Subs | 14:36 | |
| TT #1091: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1091 | |||
| whiteknight | msg cotto: Also, can you take another look at TT #1020? I think we should close that ticket as WONTFIX and plan for some of these issues to fall out of the Lorito refactors. | 14:49 | |
| aloha | OK. I'll deliver the message. | ||
| atrodo | Looks like whiteknight is trac busy | 14:50 | |
| moritz | whiteknight: "er the message. | ||
| sorry | |||
| copy&paste fail | 14:51 | ||
| "Version %d.%d of config hash is invalid, expected %d.%d. You're probably linking against an incompatible libparrot. " | |||
| whiteknight | :) | ||
| moritz | as a user, I'm really interested in the file name of the .pbc file that caused the error | ||
| is that also included? | |||
| whiteknight | moritz: no, not at the moment. If the input bytecode is coming from a string or array, it won't have a file | 14:52 | |
| but, I can add a case where we take the file name, and include that in the details | 14:53 | ||
| moritz: add that request to the ticket | |||
| dalek | TT #552 closed by whiteknight++: Evaluate all hack-identifying comments in source code | ||
| TT #552: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/552 | |||
| moritz | whiteknight: I ask for the file name in the error message in the original ticket | ||
| "This error message should include the name of the file that caused this error; otherwise it is very hard to figure out which file caused the problem." | |||
| is that not enough? | 14:54 | ||
| whiteknight | oh, i didn't see that | ||
| okay | |||
|
15:01
woosley left
15:07
Patterner left,
Psyche^ joined,
Psyche^ is now known as Patterner
15:15
PacoLinux joined
|
|||
| tadzik | ~ | 15:21 | |
|
15:23
davidfetter left
15:26
plobsing joined
|
|||
| mj41 | /msg bacek Working on proper Git support. See tapir1.ro.vutbr.cz:2000/buildstatus/pr-parrot . You can also join irc://irc.freenode.org/taptinder | 15:56 | |
| \\msg bacek Working on proper Git support. See tapir1.ro.vutbr.cz:2000/buildstatus/pr-parrot . You can also join irc://irc.freenode.org/taptinder | |||
| whiteknight | mj41++ | 15:57 | |
| mj41: Do you need any extra hands with your work? We want taptinder so badly that you would have volunteers | |||
| mj41 | whiteknight: It isn't easy tapir1.ro.vutbr.cz:2000/dbdoc/schema.png . But I would welcome any help. | 15:58 | |
| whiteknight: I'm probably doing many ugly Catalyst hacks. | 16:00 | ||
| tadzik | msg mj41 that's how you use msg | ||
| aloha | OK. I'll deliver the message. | ||
| mj41 | There is also github.com/mj41/TapTinder/issues , but not too detailed. | 16:01 | |
| msg bacek Working on proper Git support. See tapir1.ro.vutbr.cz:2000/buildstatus/pr-parrot . You can also join irc://irc.freenode.org/taptinder | |||
| aloha | OK. I'll deliver the message. | 16:02 | |
|
16:05
theory joined
16:11
plobsing left
16:20
plobsing joined
16:24
hercynium joined
16:48
darbelo left
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: 88e9072 | plobsing++ | / (20 files): Merge branch 'platform-encoding' |
16:54 | |
|
16:58
fbrito joined
|
|||
| fbrito | ~~ | 17:04 | |
| whiteknight | good morning, fbrito | 17:06 | |
| fbrito | why can I still claim tasks on GCI? isn't it over? :P | 17:07 | |
| whiteknight | i don't knpw | 17:08 | |
| know | |||
| tadzik | it's over | 17:09 | |
| Google says: all work stops | |||
| maybe melange just fails at it ;) | 17:10 | ||
| whiteknight | can't be! melange never fails at anything | 17:11 | |
|
17:17
darbelo joined
17:26
plobsing left,
bacek left
|
|||
| cotto | whiteknight, 1298 still sounds like a good idea if someone finds tuits for it. | 17:26 | |
| I'll need to look at 1020 when doing Lorito planning. Some of it is likely worth using. | 17:28 | ||
| I'm glad we did gci, but I'm very glad it's over. | 17:29 | ||
| now, back to normalesque | 17:30 | ||
|
17:37
Kristaba joined,
bacek joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | yes, GCI was awesome but exhausting | 17:38 | |
| dukeleto | ~~ | 17:39 | |
| whiteknight: i have some questions for you about the new embed api | |||
| whiteknight | dukeleto: sure. What's up? | ||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: how is extend_vtable.h related to your new embed api? I notice that api.h does not include extend_vtable.h . | 17:40 | |
| whiteknight | extend_vtable.h, and related extend_vtable.c are the old API | ||
| they aren't used by the new API | |||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: ok | ||
| dalek | tracwiki: v32 | cotto++ | CottoTasklist | ||
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/CottoTa...ction=diff | |||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: so extend_vtable.(c|h) are going away | ||
| whiteknight | the goal is to sheild end users from words like "vtable", etc | ||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: well, that is good to know, since my current TPF grant is increase test coverage on extend_vtable | 17:41 | |
| Coke | I was bummed that all the individual code coverage increases were only 3.5% all told. | ||
| IWBN to note as an update what the before/after percentages were. | |||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: perhaps I can change directions and increase code coverage on the new api | ||
| whiteknight | dukeleto: we do need access to vtables from extending applications still | ||
| so that file might want to stay, with tweaks, for that purpose | |||
| but the new embedding API will be using a different and more abstracted interface for PMC operations | 17:42 | ||
| Coke sees that checkdepend.t is skipping files again. | |||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: interesting. | ||
| Coke | can someone open a ticket for tht? | ||
| meh, I'll do it. | 17:44 | ||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: for example, how do I push an element onto a RPA in the new embed api? | ||
| dalek | rrot: 8427455 | Coke++ | t/src/checkdepend.t: Add ticket for todo. |
17:46 | |
| Coke wonders why some branches are being merged as individual commits and others as single merge commits. | 17:50 | ||
| Coke guesses "just becauses" | |||
| whiteknight | dukeleto: At the moment, there is no API for many operations, such as push | 17:53 | |
| dukeleto: we want to add them, but there hasn't been a demand yet | |||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: ok, just clarifying | ||
| whiteknight: so my tests for extend_vtable.h will be useful, when that functionality is implemented in the new API | 17:54 | ||
| Coke | ... why not expose the vtables again? | ||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: in the sense of "here is what the old api could do" | ||
| whiteknight | dukeleto: What we don't want is to have ~200 PMC operations as separate API calls, because so many of those are lower-level than the user needs to care about | ||
| Coke | (if the goal is to hide them, then it seems like the "right" thing to do would be to allow invocation of opcodes, since that's how a PIR user would get at that functionality) | 17:55 | |
| whiteknight | Coke: we want the embedding API to be more stable, and exposing all sorts of low-level interfaces like that is asking for trouble | ||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: PL/Parrot needs to be able to push and pop PMCs from a ResizablePMCArray | ||
| whiteknight | dukeleto: Noted. I'll add those methods ASAP | ||
| cotto_work | ~~ | ||
| dukeleto | cotto_work: nice blog post about GCI | ||
| whiteknight | dukeleto: I'll set up a fork of PL/Parrot and start updating to the new API, adding interfaces as necessary | 17:56 | |
| Coke | whiteknight: do you not expect anyone but core parrot to be able to use vtables? | ||
| whiteknight | Coke: extenders can and should use them | ||
| Coke: but the word "vtable" should not be in the mind of the embedder. It's too low-level | |||
| we can provide friendly wrappers around many of the vtables if needed | |||
| dalek | TT #1944 created by coke++: t/src/checkdepend.t should not skip thr_ files. | 17:57 | |
| TT #1944: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1944 | |||
| whiteknight | but a general, automagical code generator to create wrappers for all vtables is really out of the question | ||
| Coke: What the API wants to do is provide the capabilities of Parrot in a way that doesn't expose Parrot internals, Parrot architecture, etc. | 17:58 | ||
| Coke | doesn't sound quite right to me, but IANAembedder. (Is partcl considered an extender?) | ||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: you have a commit bit to PL/parrot, you can probably just make a branch | ||
| whiteknight | Coke: partcl is an extender, not an embedder. Right. | ||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: but whatever works for you | ||
| whiteknight | dukeleto: Ah, that's much easier | ||
| Coke: When you think about all the big subsystems we've refactored in the past, and all the ones we want to do in the future, and all the times Parrot has "broken" things like partcl because of well-meaning changes, we really want something more stable for people to use and rely on | 17:59 | ||
| Coke | dukeleto: are you currently the only parrot person with keys to the gcc farm? | ||
| whiteknight: I'd settle for functional at this point. <shrug> | 18:00 | ||
| dukeleto: or rather, is your access somehow tied to the parrot foundation, or can anyone from parrot sign up? | 18:01 | ||
| whiteknight | Coke: The new embedding API is very functional. And stable. And it was designed in such a way that we could completely rewrite a lot of stuff in Parrot and not affect it's stability | ||
| cotto_work | dukeleto: thanks | ||
| seen yuki`n | 18:02 | ||
| aloha | yuki`n was last seen in #parrot 15 hours 58 mins ago saying "'Night all.". | ||
| whiteknight | I sincerely hope that some of those GCI students stay on as regular contributors | 18:04 | |
| I sincerely hope that some of them go on to become GSoC students | 18:06 | ||
| dukeleto | cotto_work: anybody can ask for access and I am currently the only one with access | 18:07 | |
| cotto_work | dukeleto: to what? gcc compile farm? | ||
| mikehh | there are a bunch of build error in latest parrot with g++ | ||
| cotto_work has the memory of a goldfish | 18:08 | ||
| Coke | cotto_work: he was probably talking to me. He can't seem to keep us straight. | ||
| dukeleto | Coke: anybody can ask for access and I am currently the only one with access | ||
| whiteknight | you mean Coke and cotto_work aren't the same person? | ||
| dukeleto | cotto_work: sorry, tab-complete fail | ||
| whiteknight | mind = blown | ||
| cotto_work | Coke: I know the feeling. Half the time I think you're me. | ||
| Coke | That's got to be rough on me. | ||
|
18:09
Coke is now known as cokke_work
|
|||
| whiteknight | cotto_work: is the opmap_aware_pmc branch able to be deleted? It was merged, but the branch is still there | 18:11 | |
|
18:11
sri is now known as srilicious
|
|||
| cotto_work | whiteknight: verify with bacek but I think the answer is that it's safe to nuke. | 18:11 | |
| He's taken it over with his robot-like efficiency. | |||
| whiteknight | He is truely a gentleman and a scholar | 18:12 | |
| cotto_work | a gentlebot and a scholarbot | ||
| whiteknight | msg bacek the opmap_aware_pmc branch was merged. Can we delete it from github? Thanks | ||
| aloha | OK. I'll deliver the message. | ||
| whiteknight | msg plobsing the platform-encoding branch was merged, can we delete it from github? Thanks | 18:13 | |
| aloha | OK. I'll deliver the message. | ||
| whiteknight | I really want to continue Tene's work on the exceptions refactor stuff. I don't think his branch is salvagable, but there isn't too much stuff in there | ||
| dukeleto | fbrito: students are still submitting tasks? What kind of insanity is this? | 18:16 | |
| Tene | whiteknight: the patches themselves are pretty small; it would be pretty simple to re-do. | 18:17 | |
| cotto_work | dukeleto: I guess it's good enough for melange to disable mentor and admin access to task manipulation | ||
| dukeleto | cotto_work: students are still getting points, so something is wrong | 18:18 | |
| cotto_work: fbrito notes that someone just bumped someone else out of the 10th spot | |||
| cotto_work | whiskey tango foxtrot | ||
| dukeleto | cotto_work: there could be riots in the streets | ||
| cotto_work | Google clearly didn't put their A team on gci. | 18:22 | |
|
18:23
kurahaupo joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | don't go criticizing google | 18:25 | |
| anything they do or provide is 100% more than we would have had otherwise | |||
| cotto_work | This is true. | ||
| thanks for the perpective | |||
| *perspective | |||
| There are annoying inconsistencies and UI problems, but gci has definitely been an overall win. | 18:26 | ||
| whiteknight | the first GCI is definitely a learning process | 18:27 | |
| and I'm not exactly volunteering to help fix melange myself | |||
| Tene | whiteknight: additionally, if you have any questions about the work in that branch, just ask me, and I'm glad to chat about it. | ||
| whiteknight | if somebody is submitting tasks after the deadline, and those points are changing the list of "winners", that is a problem | 18:28 | |
| dukeleto | This "first GCI" is actually the second time this contest has existed. It was called "Google Highly Open Participation Contest" before | ||
| whiteknight: that is what I hear. fbrito says that the #10 spot just changed | |||
| whiteknight | Tene: Will do. I've been looking at the changeset, doesn't look hard. Changing most of the vtable->base_type checks to VTABLE_isa checks would be a big help | ||
| dukeleto | but this is the first year it was called "Google Code-In" | ||
| dukeleto was not involved in the first year (GHOP) | |||
| whiteknight | Tene: This is the changeset according to github: github.com/parrot/parrot/compare/m...tor#diff-3 | ||
| cotto_work | Out of the top 10 students, 8 appear to have completed tasks after the deadline. I'm not entirely sure what it means though, since some of the dates are in the future. | 18:29 | |
| dukeleto | good lord. | ||
| cotto_work | socghop.appspot.com/gci/student_ran...10/aoihana | 18:30 | |
| whiteknight | that's a lot of Romanian! | 18:32 | |
| did that student write any code? | |||
| dukeleto contacts Carol Smith | 18:33 | ||
| Tene | whiteknight: that part was easy. The only actual problem I ran into with it was dealing with two separate sets of storage for instances of subclasses. | ||
| whiteknight | Tene: what do you mean? | ||
| Tene | whiteknight: depending on which set of vtables I used to access attributes, I'd get a different attribute storage. | 18:34 | |
| I don't remember the details there, lemme look at the changeset. | |||
| dukeleto | The melange devs are telling me that they will remove any points/tasks completed by students after the GCI deadline | 18:35 | |
| cotto_work | ok. I figured there'd be a mop-up operation. | ||
| dukeleto | there is almost always some timezone/time-of-day issues with deadlines | ||
| cotto_work | Where are they hanging out? I'd like to say thanks. | ||
| dukeleto | cotto_work: #melange on freenode | ||
| Tene | whiteknight: do you see the places I changed set_attr_str to set_pmc_keyed_str? | 18:36 | |
| erm, one place. | |||
| There were a few issues like that that I still wanted to track down. | |||
| Somehow, if I directly called {get,set}_attr, I'd be accessing a different place than if I used {get,set}_*_keyed, which just called {get,set}_attr | 18:38 | ||
| whiteknight | weird | ||
| Tene: Are there any specific test cases you were working on? Do you have any tests that currently fail but should pass? | 18:39 | ||
| Tene | I had a test I wrote, where I instantiated a subclass of exception, set_attr ex, 'msg', 'a'; ex['msg'] = 'b'; $S0 = get_attr ex, 'msg'; $S1 = ex['msg']; | ||
| $S0 was 'a', $S1 was 'b' | |||
| whiteknight | Tene: okay. that seems easy | 18:40 | |
| Tene | Nobody could offer me any help with that, so I just standardized everything to use the same interface, or something. | ||
| cotto_work | who broke the build? | ||
| whiteknight | okay | ||
|
18:40
srilicious is now known as sri
|
|||
| dukeleto | From Carol Smith (the GCI coordinator): No, you cannot work on further tasks. However, students that submitted work before the deadline can still have mentors approve their tasks now and therefore still gain points and move around in the rankings. | 18:40 | |
| so some mentors are still getting around to reviewing submitted tasks | 18:41 | ||
| Tene | whiteknight: I don't think that's a critical issue, as long as basic operations all work. The only issue is if there are codepaths somewhere where someone passes in an instance of a subclass, and it uses the wrong storage location. | ||
| and whether it's possible for users to write code that works with exceptions, but not with subclasses. | 18:42 | ||
| That sort of concern was why I never merged it in; I wanted some feedback on whether this behaviour was expected, whether it was a bug or not, etc. | 18:43 | ||
|
18:47
plobsing joined
|
|||
| NotFound | whiteknight: I think we can't fully fix the subclassing problems without rethinking and reworking the attributes access. | 18:50 | |
|
18:50
TiMBuS left
|
|||
| whiteknight | NotFound: Not completely. But I do think we can get things working much better than they are working now | 18:57 | |
| plobsing | ~~ | 19:00 | |
| while we're talking about exceptions, do we have a mechanism for exception handlers to rethrow the exception *without* updating the backtrace? if not, we really should. I've been frustrated by this too many times already. | 19:03 | ||
| NotFound | We have the rethrow opcode, but is deprecated, isn't it? | 19:05 | |
| moritz | can't it be a method? | 19:06 | |
| plobsing | NotFound: I tried that. it didn't help. | ||
| NotFound | If we need it, we can undeprecate and fix. | ||
| whiteknight | plobsing: Open a ticket for that and assign it to me | ||
| NotFound | We can also use the can_handle method on the handler, but that way needs subclassing | 19:07 | |
| whiteknight | As part of the embedding API work I changed it so that the backtrace printer outputs a STRING instead of printing it right to stderr. I can cache that on rethrow and keep long compound histories now | ||
| plobsing | but rethrow from within parrot shouldn't hit the embedding API | 19:08 | |
| also backtraces within parrot are arrays, not strings | |||
| moritz | array sounds find | 19:09 | |
| cokke_work | there's already a ticket for that exception request. moment. | 19:10 | |
|
19:10
cokke_work is now known as Coke
|
|||
| Coke | trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1283 | 19:11 | |
| assigned it to whiteknight. | 19:12 | ||
| plobsing | yes. that is *exactly* what I'm asking for. | ||
| Coke | plobsing: welcome to Oct 2008. :P | ||
| whiteknight | Coke++ | ||
| plobsing | the current behaviour makes debugging Ωη grammars (which use exceptions for failures) very painful | 19:13 | |
| whiteknight | plobsing: I'll try to get this implemented ASAP | ||
| Coke | be sure to read the original thread on RT also, as allison seems to have a slightly different idea on resolving it. | ||
| whiteknight | I would like it in for 3.0 | ||
| Coke; will do | |||
| Coke | /to have/to have had/, anyway. | 19:14 | |
| NotFound | So rethrow is not deprecated? I can't find a ticket for that, maybe it was not ported from RT, | 19:17 | |
| whiteknight | I don't think rethrow is deprecated | 19:18 | |
| plobsing | what does that mean for the proposed changes? | ||
| whiteknight | and if I am going to be adding behavior to it to provide better backtraces, I don't think it should be | ||
| Coke | it's not deprecated. | ||
| SFAIK. | 19:19 | ||
| especially since it doesn't do the same thing that throw does, even if it's not the different thing Pm & plobsing & I expected. | |||
|
19:26
plobsing left
19:33
plobsing joined
|
|||
| NotFound | rethrow just sets the unhandled state in the excpetion and calls Parrot_ex_throw_from_op | 19:54 | |
| whiteknight | right | ||
| I'm going to push a few exploratory commits here in a minute | |||
| dukeleto | bit dynop tests are still failing on 64bit | 19:59 | |
| smolder.parrot.org/app/projects/rep...tails/2179 | |||
| dukeleto goes for a run | 20:00 | ||
| cotto_work | Is the build broken for anyone else? | 20:14 | |
| plobsing | those tests fail for me as well | 20:16 | |
| whiteknight | cotto_work: I don't know. I'll try it in a second | ||
| dalek | rrot/exception_backtraces: 3c6f7d0 | Whiteknight++ | src/ (3 files): rethrow caches the old backtrace. |
20:21 | |
| rrot/exception_backtraces: 0bc55ee | Whiteknight++ | src/exceptions.c: +docs |
|||
| rrot/exception_backtraces: 0a4f093 | Whiteknight++ | / (4 files): build fixes |
|||
| cotto_work | I'm bisecting now | 20:24 | |
| NotFound | The algorithm for the rot op looks odd for me. | 20:30 | |
| dalek | rrot: 62b8c4e | plobsing++ | src/ (2 files): use platform strings in directory read PARROT_EXPORT must be used because OS is a dynpmc |
20:31 | |
| NotFound | plobsing: WTF is a platform string? | 20:32 | |
| plobsing | it is platform-specific-encoded string | ||
| on windows, probably utf-16. on linux, probably utf-8, but also possibly latin-1 or ascii. | 20:33 | ||
| cotto_work | github.com/parrot/parrot/commit/9c...94e7d870fe is the culprit | ||
| that one breaks the build on my box | |||
| NotFound | plobsing: I can have names utf8 encoded and names iso-8859-1 encoded. With that change, such directory can't be read. | ||
| plobsing | NotFound: unicode-aware applications should respect the locale | ||
| NotFound | plobsing: reading directories shouldn't fail for such reason. | 20:34 | |
| plobsing | working with strings coming from directories shouldn't fail because we guess about the encoding. locale is the way the user tells its programs how to interpret file names (among other things). | 20:35 | |
| NotFound | plobsing: and the locale is choosen by the user, not | ||
| not by the system as a whole | |||
| plobsing | cotto_work: that one appears to be mine. what is the error message and what platform are you on? | 20:36 | |
| cotto_work | ubuntu 10.10 x86 | 20:37 | |
| plobsing | NotFound: try Filehandle.readall() on strings comming from OS.readdir. it fails to open files (with error "no such file") for me. | ||
| the file *is* there, I just read the directory! | 20:38 | ||
| cotto_work | trying to reproduce. it'll be a minute | ||
| plobsing | changing directory read to respect locale fixes the problem | 20:39 | |
| nopaste | "cotto" at 192.168.1.3 pasted "broken build" (15 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/27671 | 20:40 | |
| cotto_work | plobsing: ^ | ||
|
20:40
Andy joined
|
|||
| plobsing | NotFound: we had 2 different, both incorrect, strategies for dealing with platform strings | 20:43 | |
| (1) assume ascii - obviously wrong | |||
| (2) passthrough (assume binary) - wrong whenever you start doing things with such strings (eg: mangling paths) | |||
| the worst is what happens when both assumptions come into play in the same program | 20:45 | ||
| NotFound | plobsing: (2) is better than being unable to read some directories. At least you can recode it if you want. | 20:49 | |
|
20:51
plobsing left
20:55
plobsing joined
20:57
perlite_ joined
|
|||
| plobsing | NotFound: you can delegate the recoding down the line, yes. but that just pushes the same problem to everyone trying to do anything remotely intelligent with directories. | 20:57 | |
| what, for example, should distutils do? | 20:58 | ||
| NotFound | The problem is: using binary or iso-8859-1 all characters are valid, even if printing looks ugly, but using utf8 there are invalid byte streams. | ||
| plobsing | but using binary strings breaks any program that tries to do anything with the paths | 20:59 | |
| the case for using binary strings is basically limited to ls | |||
|
21:00
perlite left,
perlite_ is now known as perlite
|
|||
| NotFound | plobsing: I think the only sane solution is to have a lousy utf8 that converts invalid utf8 bytes to some private codepoints, | 21:01 | |
| plobsing | NotFound: that could work | 21:02 | |
| alternate full solutions include optional parameters for getting binary-encoded strings from system operations or giving access to the platform encoding alias to users (so they could reset this to "binary" if they so chose) | 21:03 | ||
| NotFound | plobsing: the problem with user driven solutions is that a user that gets a "Cannot read directory" error may not even notice what is the problem. | 21:05 | |
| plobsing | but, if we did things right, users would get "Cannot read directory: invalid UTF-8 string" which explains *exactly* what the problem is | ||
| at which point, they could take steps to remedy the problem | 21:06 | ||
| NotFound | plobsing: I think I can without much effort creating a directory with a bunch of such errors where ls looks perfectly normal. | 21:07 | |
| And I have seen such things at works, accidentally cretaed,. | 21:08 | ||
| Or smb mounts unappropiately configured. | |||
| Most users can't figure what is the problem. | 21:09 | ||
| plobsing | ls from gnucoreutils (yes I know most shells implement it themselves) respects locale | 21:10 | |
| sorear | the obviously correct thing to do is "whatever ls does" | ||
| ls needs a robust way to go from bytes to characters for printing | 21:11 | ||
| on Windows, do "whatever explorer.exe does" | |||
| cotto_work | plobsing: can you resolve this quickly or should the change be reverted? | ||
| sorear | files should show up to Parrot as they show up to the user | ||
| NotFound | Some systems just replace inavlid utf8 with one special purpose codepoint, but that way will fail to open the files. | ||
| plobsing | cotto_work: I have no clue, I'm trying to do 3 things at once. | 21:12 | |
| NotFound | A full solution should use one codepoint for each invalid byte. | ||
| plobsing | I can probably have it finished by day-end PST | ||
|
21:13
wagle joined
|
|||
| NotFound | sorear: on Windows I think the best way is to use Unicode aware functions and convert the utf16 that windows provides to utf8. | 21:13 | |
| dalek | Heuristic branch merge: pushed 135 commits to parrot/kill_packfile_new_dummy by Whiteknight | ||
| whiteknight | Windows will typically do proper unicode with the -W functions | 21:14 | |
| NotFound | But the console input/output usually is not configured for unicode, so the file names may need conversion. | ||
| whiteknight | Unable to open filehandle from path '--ou' | ||
| I'm getting that build error today when I try to build master | |||
| plobsing | not you too | 21:15 | |
| whiteknight | others are seeing that too? | ||
| cotto_work | whiteknight: the build is broken for me too. It could be related. | ||
| nopaste.snit.ch/27671 | |||
| NotFound | --ou ? | 21:16 | |
| whiteknight | NotFound: comes from this command-line: ./parrot runtime/parrot/library/PGE/Perl6Grammar.pir --output=compilers/pge/PGE/builtins_gen.pir compilers/pge/PGE/builtins.pg | ||
| the --output is getting mangled | |||
| atrodo | Just got the same thing as well | 21:17 | |
| NotFound | master builds fine for me | ||
| plobsing | people with build failures: what locale do you have configured? | 21:18 | |
| NotFound | But looks like is failing a bunch of tests | ||
| cotto_work | plobsing: is that $LANG? | ||
| NotFound | Uh, oh... there are locale problems with the floating pint, | 21:19 | |
| plobsing | cotto_work: it is LC_ALL || LC_CTYPE || LANG | ||
| NotFound | point | ||
| cotto_work | en_US.utf8 then | ||
| NotFound | I'm seeing thinks like: got 0,1 expected 0.1 | ||
| Spain locales use , as decimal point. | |||
| plobsing | huh. I'm on utf-8 and I don't see failures | ||
| NotFound: that one is probably easier to remedy | 21:20 | ||
| there's some granularity in locales I chose to ignore. maybe it is in there. | |||
| whiteknight | Maybe we want Parrot to respect user locale, and our tests for floating point format is wrong | ||
| of course, that fix is probably harder to do than the "just ignore it" fix | 21:21 | ||
| NotFound | plobsing: Is a known issue, I've seen such things even in Borland Kylix | ||
| plobsing | whiteknight: or "ignore except for known-good locales" | ||
| atrodo | plobsing> I have no locale set | ||
| whiteknight | it would do Parrot well to be more language- and locale-respectful in the future | 21:22 | |
| NotFound | whiteknight: we don't want to always respect locale for such things. Programming languages almost never do that. | ||
| plobsing | atrodo: you have *something* set. if you haven't done anything, chances are it is en_US.UTF-8 | ||
| NotFound | That was the kylix failure. | ||
| The only compilers I know that did such things were cobol with the DECIMAL POINT IS COMMA option. | 21:23 | ||
| whiteknight | In C# I can write software which is completely localizable and translatable. .NET makes that easy for the programmer by providing all the necessary tools | ||
| NotFound | whiteknight: yes, but you don't that in the source text. | ||
| whiteknight | I can always pass a locale name, or "current locale" to object.ToString() and get the right results | ||
| plobsing: Do you think my build failure is related to the platform-encoding branch merge? | 21:24 | ||
| atrodo | plobsing> Not sure about UTF-8, the box was built in 2004, but nothing is set in my env | ||
| whiteknight | because I only have about ~5 minutes here at this computer to get diagnostics information for you | ||
| After that I'm packing up and heading home | |||
| NotFound | const PI = 3.14 # Change this to fit your locale decimal point | ||
| whiteknight | NotFound: in the actual source code? | 21:25 | |
| plobsing | whiteknight: are you seeing the *exact* same failure as cotto_work ? | ||
| whiteknight | no | ||
| plobsing: my failure is this: Unable to open filehandle from path '--ou' | |||
| NotFound | whiteknight: there was at least one Kylix version with that bug, yes. | ||
| whiteknight | in response to: ./parrot runtime/parrot/library/PGE/Perl6Grammar.pir --output=compilers/pge/PGE/builtins_gen.pir compilers/pge/PGE/builtins.pg | 21:26 | |
| plobsing | that means that Parrot_str_platform_strlen() is returning the wrong value for some reason on that argument. | ||
| whiteknight: where is the API function that wraps argv? | 21:27 | ||
| whiteknight | plobsing: yes | ||
| src/embed/pmc.c, Parrot_api_pmc_wrap_string_array, or something like that | |||
| Parrot_api_pmc_wrap_string_array | 21:28 | ||
| plobsing | yep. that's where the failure is most likely occurring. | ||
| NotFound | I got several hundreds of test fails. | ||
| whiteknight | it calls Parrot_str_from_platform_string to do the conversion | ||
| plobsing | which in turn calls Parrot_str_platform_strlen and uses Parrot_platform_encoding_ptr | 21:29 | |
| whiteknight | although that doesn't make sense, since argv is char*, not wchar_t* | ||
| NotFound | Mmmm... make test don't do a grand total of fails? | ||
| plobsing | argv *can* contain non-ascii characters | ||
| the previous assumption of ASCII was very wrong | 21:30 | ||
| whiteknight | okay, on that note I need to pack up and go home | ||
| I'll be back on in ~60min for more debuggerization | |||
|
21:31
whiteknight left
|
|||
| NotFound | A lot of the failures are the . -> , floating point problem | 21:31 | |
| plobsing | NotFound: s/LC_ALL/LC_CTYPE/ in calls to setlocale should eliminate the locale-respect of printf | 21:32 | |
| NotFound | There are also tests that looks for the text of error messages and are getting localized versions | ||
|
21:33
avms joined
|
|||
| NotFound | For example: Failed test 'Test bad OS.lstat' ... # No existe el fichero o el directorio .... doesn't match .... No such file or directory ... | 21:34 | |
| plobsing | atrodo: do you have time to help me debug? can you step through Parrot_api_pmc_wrap_string_array for the failing invocation and tell me if the values returned by Parrot_str_from_platform_cstring() correspond or not to the values in argv? | ||
| atrodo | plobsing> With a little guidance, i can lend a little bit of time | 21:35 | |
| plobsing | atrodo: awesome! 1st, do you have gdb? are you at all familiar with it? | 21:36 | |
| atrodo | Yes, and enough to get around | ||
| plobsing | OK. the command './parrot runtime/parrot/library/PGE/Perl6Grammar.pir ...' fails for you as well, correct? prefix that with 'gdb --args' | 21:37 | |
| atrodo | Okay | ||
| plobsing | set a breakpoint at Parrot_api_pmc_wrap_string_array | ||
| atrodo | Do you know a good place to set the breakpoint? | ||
| NotFound | Using LANG=C I got: Failed test 'Test OS.readdir with ord >127' at t/dynpmc/os.t line 395. Invalid character in ASCII string | 21:38 | |
| atrodo | okay. And apparently, now i'm in gdbtui | ||
| plobsing | good. next-source-line-step (n) through that function. at each loop iteration print argv[i] and *arg. they should be the same. | 21:40 | |
| atrodo | nopaste? | 21:41 | |
| plobsing | please | ||
| atrodo | aloha> nopaste? | ||
| aloha | atrodo: Dunno. | ||
| atrodo | drat | 21:42 | |
| plobsing | aloha: nopaste? | ||
| aloha | plobsing: nopaste is is nopaste.snit.ch (works with the script in $_PARROT/tools/dev/nopaste.pl) | ||
| plobsing | > does not parse so well | ||
| atrodo | apparently | ||
| nopaste | "atrodo" at 192.168.1.3 pasted "for plobsing" (6 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/27672 | 21:43 | |
| atrodo | *arg ends up being blank on the first arg | ||
| plobsing | print arg *after* it is assigned (gdb shows the line it is about to evaluate) | ||
| nopaste | "atrodo" at 192.168.1.3 pasted "for plobsing" (20 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/27673 | 21:44 | |
| atrodo | plobsing> Yep, each time it was examined at line 536 | ||
| plobsing | oh. ouch. | 21:45 | |
|
21:45
rurban_ joined
|
|||
| plobsing | atrodo: can you step into Parrot_str_from_platform_cstring -> Parrot_str_new_init from there and print the value of '*s'? | 21:47 | |
| atrodo | sure, hold on | 21:48 | |
|
21:48
rurban left,
rurban_ is now known as rurban,
Kulag left
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: aa0783b | plobsing++ | include/parrot/string_funcs.h: headerizer |
21:48 | |
| atrodo | *s is an empty string | 21:49 | |
| plobsing | at the end? | ||
| atrodo | hmmm | ||
| plobsing | ok, what's len? | ||
|
21:49
Kulag joined
|
|||
| plobsing | and is 'buffer' the expected value? | 21:50 | |
| atrodo | the string passed to Parrot_str_platform_strlen is empty... | 21:51 | |
| Coke | is this breakage happening in master? | ||
| (re previous discussion about encodings and failing tests) | |||
| cotto_work | yes | 21:52 | |
| NotFound | --ou -> 4 --output -> 8 Maybe some misconversion and some mixing of lenght and bytelength | ||
| atrodo | Okay, in Parrot_str_new_init, buffer is correct, but len is set to 0 | 21:53 | |
| Very strange. The call to Parrot_str_platform_strlen uses c just like the outside call to Parrot_str_new_init does, but Parrot_str_platform_strlen gets an empty string and Parrot_str_new_init gets the right string | 21:54 | ||
| on the second time around, s in Parrot_str_platform_strlen is garbage | |||
| plobsing | gah. that's just plain weird | 21:55 | |
| Coke | ... can we please not break master? it's (*!@#&$ hard enough to bisect as it is. | ||
| atrodo | I've got to run | 21:56 | |
| plobsing | I have a theory of why it doesn't work | 21:57 | |
| Parrot_str_platform_strlen is not predeclared | |||
| NotFound | plobsing: ack don't show it in any .h file | 21:58 | |
| plobsing | apparently platform-specific function predeclaration is manually maintained in include/parrot/platform_interface.h | ||
| theory belches | 21:59 | ||
| NotFound | "Get the length of a platform-encoded C string." What does this mean? | ||
| Coke wonders how that isn't "strlen" | 22:00 | ||
| plobsing | utf16 strlen != strlen | 22:01 | |
| it is strlen on linux | |||
| NotFound | plobsing: What system uses utf16 for char * ? | 22:02 | |
| dalek | rrot: 4ae951d | plobsing++ | include/parrot/platform_interface.h: remove declaration of dead memexec functions |
||
| rrot: a70cd1b | plobsing++ | include/parrot/platform_interface.h: predeclare platform encoding functions |
|||
| rrot: b65708c | plobsing++ | src/string/api.c: add interp as first parameter to function (major thinko) |
|||
| plobsing | b65708c probably fixes the problem | ||
| not sure why it wasn't failing here | |||
| maybe realclean doesn't remove the appropriate .o file | 22:03 | ||
| NotFound: types can lie | 22:05 | ||
| NotFound | plobsing: the use void * to a-void confusion. | ||
| Same failure as before with LANG=C | 22:08 | ||
| And still a lot of failures with es_ES.UTF-8 | 22:09 | ||
| nopaste | "plobsing" at 192.168.1.3 pasted "[PATCH] higher granularity locale for NotFound" (26 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/27674 | 22:10 | |
| plobsing | NotFound: try ^^this^^ | ||
| people with build failures: please try b65708c to see if it fixes your problems | 22:11 | ||
|
22:13
darbelo left
|
|||
| cotto_work | plobsing: looks better for me | 22:16 | |
| plobsing | \\o/ | ||
| not sure why that was working for me. it was horribly wrong. | |||
| cotto_work | and by "better" I mean "good" | ||
| plobsing | quirk of the x86_64 ABI I suppose | ||
| cotto_work | How did that even compile? | 22:17 | |
|
22:17
darbelo joined
|
|||
| plobsing | when you fail to predeclare, you predeclare failure | 22:17 | |
| or something like that | |||
|
22:18
darbelo left
|
|||
| NotFound | plobsing: fine with my usual locale, still fails with LANG=C | 22:19 | |
| And of course, the fails in dynoplibs/bit.t and library/sha.t remains. | 22:20 | ||
| plobsing | (re: LANG=C) that sets ASCII as the platform encoding. very probably, you've got non-ASCII paths. | 22:21 | |
| maybe platform string should *try* to encode according to locale and fall back on binary encoding | 22:22 | ||
| NotFound | plobsing: the test that fails uses a non-ascii path on purpose. | ||
| Failed test 'Test OS.readdir with ord >127' | |||
| plobsing | we have a test for non-ascii paths? does that work on all filesystems? | ||
| NotFound | at t/dynpmc/os.t line 395. | 22:23 | |
| plobsing: no system that I know has problem with using byte values > 127, even if printing them may looks ugly or wrong, | 22:25 | ||
| bacek_at_work | ~~ | 22:26 | |
| NotFound | But if we have a strict ascii encoding and use it, of course we should fail at that. | ||
| plobsing | which is basically what LANG=C does | ||
| it says "expect strings to be ascii" | |||
| NotFound | plobsing: no program that I know restrict to strict ascii with LANG=C | 22:27 | |
| cotto_work | hi bacek_at_work | ||
| bacek_at_work | aloha, cotto_work | ||
| NotFound | That's why many people talk about "extended ascii" | ||
| plobsing | true, strict reading of standards may lead to serious violation of POLS | 22:28 | |
| NotFound | Which ususally means "the system works by magic, except when it does unexpected things" | ||
| And they call "wizards" the pepole able to fix things because of that ;) | 22:29 | ||
| His magic is more powerful. | |||
| plobsing | we could probably get by with falling back to binary when platform-encoding fails | ||
| it would only fail where it absolutely had to | 22:30 | ||
| in stead of everywhere it might eventually | |||
| is that an acceptable option? | 22:31 | ||
| of course failures would be more cryptic ("why is my program emitting complete jibberish?") in stead of ("oh hai, u haz an encodingz problem") | |||
| NotFound | plobsing: for a quick fix, WFM, but for long term we should consider the lousy utf8 approach. | 22:32 | |
| And maybe hard-code iso-8859-1 in some systems. | |||
| cotto_work | POLS? | 22:35 | |
| plobsing | aloha: POLS? | 22:36 | |
| aloha | plobsing: I give up. | ||
| plobsing | POLS is the principle of least surprise | ||
| aloha: POLS? | |||
| aloha | plobsing: POLS is the principle of least surprise | ||
| GeJ | aloha: POLA? | ||
| aloha | GeJ: Search me, bub. | ||
| NotFound | Failing to read a directory that most tools and applications can navigate without problem is a BIG surprise. | 22:37 | |
| GeJ | hey, watch that attitude of yours young girl! | ||
| cotto_work | principle of least awesomeness? | 22:38 | |
| GeJ | astonishment. | ||
| plobsing | I like cotto's better | ||
| GeJ | :) | 22:39 | |
| NotFound | I should have be more specific: is BIG BAD surprise. | 22:42 | |
|
22:43
hercynium left
|
|||
| NotFound | I'm not completely against good surprises. | 22:43 | |
| plobsing | NotFound: I'll admit that the solution I implemented doesn't solve for the general case. But it *does* solve for a fairly common case: a system with encodings which are everywhere-consistent and locales which are set up properly. | 22:44 | |
| aka UnicornOS | |||
| NotFound | plobsing: I'm sure they are the majority is USA. | 22:46 | |
| plobsing | I'd wager they're also fairly common for single-user systems abroad. | ||
| NotFound | plobsing: I don't like a general purpose tool like parrot with such restrictions. | 22:48 | |
|
22:48
fperrad left
|
|||
| plobsing | covering some cases well and failing early in others is better than failing late and cryptically | 22:49 | |
|
22:49
Andy left,
hudnix left
|
|||
| NotFound | plobsing: failing early to read or navigate a directory does not solve anything. | 22:50 | |
| plobsing | chances are you are going to want to do something with the strings you read from a directory. if you don't encode them properly, you are going to do that something incorrectly. | 22:51 | |
| NotFound | People may be surprised while seeing funny characteres in a directory that they don't know were here, but is no surprise to see funny characteres when they are here. | 22:52 | |
| So the surprise doesn't come from parrot, comes from the directory. | |||
| plobsing: yes, but failing to do something with them is not a proper encoding. | 22:53 | ||
| dalek | rrot: e635b0a | plobsing++ | / (6 files): fix C++ build |
||
| plobsing | I suppose most (all?) cases of mistaken-encoding are (mostly) harmless because the operations we're performing on them mostly deal with ASCII characters (which are usually encoded the same way) | 22:54 | |
| NotFound | plobsing: but if we assume strict encoding in strings that come from the operating system or external libs, we have a problem. | 22:57 | |
| latin-1 and the like don't have that problem because any byte is a valid character, but strict ascii and utf8 do. | 22:58 | ||
| plobsing | NotFound: I can see your point. But I don't think we can go down the route of being agnostic about encoding (as the kernel does). | 22:59 | |
| NotFound | plobsing: maybe not, but we should support the corner cases some way. | 23:00 | |
| At least in the lower levels, the HLLs and librarys may filter whatever way they want. But you can't unfilter if the lower level fails. | 23:02 | ||
|
23:02
avms left
|
|||
| plobsing | NotFound: I'll work on a more general solution soon. Decommuting. | 23:03 | |
| NotFound | ok | 23:04 | |
|
23:09
plobsing left
|
|||
| cotto_work | seen andy | 23:10 | |
| aloha | andy was last seen in #parrot 2 hours 29 mins ago joining the channel. | ||
| cotto_work | seen petdance | ||
| aloha | petdance was last seen in #perl6 43 days 19 hours ago joining the channel. | ||
|
23:19
hudnix joined
23:22
hudnix left
23:23
hudnix joined,
kid51 joined
|
|||
| kid51 | . | 23:24 | |
| dalek | rrot: 24280fc | mikehh++ | config/gen/makefiles/root.in: fix dependency for src/runcore/profiling.c |
23:28 | |
| kid51 | mikehh: ping | 23:39 | |
| mikehh | kid51: pong | 23:41 | |
| bacek_at_work | cotto_work, I've deleted opmap_aware branch | ||
| kid51 | mikehh: Have you merged html_cleanup yet? | ||
| mikehh | kid51: not yet - I was making sure master was ok first :-} will do it in an hore or so | 23:42 | |
| hour | 23:45 | ||
| dalek | TT #1927 closed by jkeenan++: Parrot doesn't build with spaces in directory name | ||
| TT #1927: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1927 | |||
| atrodo | b65708c built for me | 23:46 | |
| kid51 | I see that earlier I got a failure in t/dynpmc/os.t. | 23:47 | |
| cotto_work | bacek_at_work: thanks | ||
| kid51 | This is a file I often see fail, but not consistently. | ||
| dalek | Heuristic branch merge: pushed 24 commits to parrot/nwellnhof/platform_src by nwellnhof | ||
| cotto_work | I really like that new message. | 23:51 | |
|
23:52
nwellnhof joined
|
|||
| mikehh | should add to karma though, like nwellnhof++ | 23:52 | |
| cotto_work | yes | 23:53 | |
| kapace_: ping | |||
| kapace_ | hey cotto_work, just got back from school | ||
| cotto_work | wb then | ||
| kapace_: in your pfbcs pull request, why do you test that pfbcs doesn't implement pack? | |||
| nwellnhof | dalek++ | 23:54 | |
| kapace_ | those were the only methods left to cover | ||
| cotto_work | ah | ||
| kapace_ | I was thinking of making some sort of todo test? | ||
| so then when they pass unexpectedly, we can just get rid of the third arg (todo) to ok() or whatever | 23:55 | ||
| cotto_work | There's no need for them. PackfileSegment implements them the same way. | ||
| nwellnhof | cotto: when no platform specific file is found, the one in the "generic" directory is used. it's exactly like the current system. | ||
| cotto_work | bacek_at_work: can pfbcs.pack and unpack be removed? | ||
| nwellnhof | cotto: it can happen that no generic file is found, but that's ok. | ||
| nopaste | "kid51" at 192.168.1.3 pasted "t/dynpmc/os.t: New failure in 'Test OS.readdir with ord >127'" (59 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/27675 | 23:56 | |
| kapace_ | cotto_work, so they can be removed?, oh well see what bacek says | ||
| then I'll remove them in the same branch as removing share_ro? | |||
| cotto_work | nwellnhof: what about when someone adds a platform-specific file but forgets a generic version? | ||
| kapace_: better to use your pfbcs test branch | |||
| kapace_ | ok | ||
| cotto_work | keep similar stuff together | 23:57 | |
| kapace_: test_methods looks fine | 23:58 | ||
| nwellnhof | cotto: we should always have a generic version. like in the current system. | ||
| dalek | Heuristic branch merge: pushed 20 commits to parrot/nwellnhof/unicode_filenames by nwellnhof | ||
| nwellnhof | what's the heuristic? more than 5 commits? | 23:59 | |
| cotto_work | nwellnhof: of course. I'm just thinking about how to code defensively. | ||
| fail early, etc | |||