|
Parrot 3.0.0 Released | parrot.org | Log: irclog.perlgeek.de/parrot/today | Goals: write GettingStartedWithPlumage, review html documentation, test HLLs, review deprecations | merge at will Set by moderator on 18 January 2011. |
|||
|
00:02
Kristaba left
|
|||
| mikehh | All tests PASS (pre/post-config, make corevm/make coretest, smoke (#3756) fulltest) at 3_0_0-78-g8f579d3 - Ubuntu 10.10 amd64 (g++-4.5) | 00:05 | |
| Coke | dukeleto: posted a patch for you. | ||
| dalek | rrot: 2dcf61e | NotFound++ | lib/Parrot/Pmc2c/PMCEmitter.pm: simplify a bit the C code generated for MULTI vtable functions |
00:06 | |
| dukeleto | Coke: already merged it | 00:07 | |
| Coke: feel free to fork Util.git and send pull requests :) | |||
| Coke: i am thinking that i will add --debugging=0 and --test to the smoker's list of stuff to test | 00:09 | ||
| TimToady | e | 00:11 | |
| ə | 00:12 | ||
| Coke | schwats up? | 00:14 | |
| dalek | p-rx/nom: 5ab91d8 | jonathan++ | src/stage0/ (3 files): Update the bootstrap to get method cache into the stage 0. |
00:20 | |
| p-rx/nom: 9dcdea6 | jonathan++ | src/metamodel/reprs/P6opaque. (2 files): A refactor of P6opaque to start to prepare the way for natively typed attributes. Along the way, this slashes a memory allocation per object instantiation, meaning that it's now just the PMC header and the object body. Given there's no RPA for attributes any more, this boils down to half the number of allocations and half the number of GCables for 6model objects compared to current Parrot objects. |
|||
|
00:20
whiteknight joined
|
|||
| bacek_at_work | jnthn++ # new nqp will be awesome! | 00:20 | |
| jnthn | :) | 00:21 | |
| cotto_work | jnthn++ | 00:24 | |
| jnthn | aww | 00:25 | |
| Parrot_gc_allocate_fixed_size_storage and Parrot_gc_free_fixed_size_storage aren't marked as exported at the moment. | |||
| So I can't actually switch P6opaque to allocate its bodies using the fixed size allocator. | 00:26 | ||
| (Without exposing those two.) | |||
| bacek_at_work | jnthn, oops. Will fix soon | ||
| jnthn | bacek_at_work: OK, if you're fine with them being API, wfm. :) | ||
| bacek_at_work | they are in src/gc/api.c :) | 00:27 | |
| jnthn | Ah, true. :) | ||
| sleep & | 00:29 | ||
|
00:29
fbrito left
|
|||
| bacek_at_work | jnthn, done. | 00:34 | |
| dalek | rrot: f77d1a5 | bacek++ | / (2 files): Mark all functions with PARROT_EXPORT. They are in api.c anyway |
||
| dukeleto taught the smokers to pass --test to Configure.pl, but it doesn't seem that the output from those tests gets sent to smoler | |||
| smolder, even. | |||
| LTA | |||
| i think we may need a parrot-smokers mailing list. Somewhere that build failure emails can go to | 00:36 | ||
| dalek | rrot: 68b83a9 | jkeenan++ | config/gen/makefiles/root.in: Fix apilist, exportlist and malloclist to build directly after configuration. See: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1922. |
00:40 | |
| cotto_work is thoroughly surprised at how much discussion the Float gcc bug has generated | 00:43 | ||
| NotFound | I'm most surprised by the urgence of hiding the problem under a carpet. | 00:47 | |
| cotto_work | with an epsilon? | ||
| NotFound | Yeah | 00:48 | |
| cotto_work | -1 to that | ||
| whiteknight | A real float comparison algorithm would require a lot more than just a single epsilon | ||
| NotFound | A float comparaison for equality should just do that. | ||
| cotto_work | and it wouldn't be appropriate in the case where there's only a difference in some builds | ||
| NotFound | And an appropiate comparaison with an epsilon will be a lot slower than any effect the volatile may have, BTW. | 00:50 | |
| I'm tempted to suggest to kill the cmp_num vtable and make the cmp_num p p opcode always use get_number on both operands. | 00:51 | ||
| bacek_at_work | NotFound, it will not help. Float.cmp_num use .get_number for both operands. | 00:52 | |
|
00:52
fbrito joined
|
|||
| cotto_work | I think he's saying that it's an unnecessary VTABLE slot. | 00:52 | |
| hi fbrito | |||
| you'll be proud to know that one of your tests uncovered a rather mysterious behavior. | 00:53 | ||
| bacek_at_work | cotto_work, we should not blindly compare float number with 0.0. It's wrong. | ||
|
00:55
NotFound left
|
|||
| cotto_work | bacek_at_work: what are you referring to? | 00:56 | |
|
00:58
NotFound_idle is now known as NotFound
|
|||
| NotFound | bacek_at_work: we should compare with 0.0 when we need to compare with 0.0' | 00:58 | |
| Probably you shouldn't blindly use cmp_num, but that's a completely different issue. | 00:59 | ||
|
01:01
dmalcolm left
|
|||
| NotFound | And giving that we use the cmp_num vtable for <, <=, > and >=, it should do an exact comparaison or we risk to have funny results in lots of usages. | 01:01 | |
| But again, I don't understand the urgence. The speed lost is absolutely non mensurable. | 01:03 | ||
| Even less if you compare speeds with an epsilon ;) | |||
| whiteknight | if we are using it for relationals, then that's fine | 01:11 | |
| I would agree that cmp_num is a worthless vtable slot | 01:12 | ||
| sorear | Andy++ # SANITY | 01:42 | |
| dalek | rito: 2268684 | (Jon Gentle)++ | internal_pmc. (2 files): Change lorito_file_new to const char* and save the name with a strdup |
02:14 | |
| rito: feaf970 | (Jon Gentle)++ | / (3 files): Make the loadbc function private and add the public lorito_load_bytecode |
|||
| rito: ac754af | (Jon Gentle)++ | core.c: Fill in the loadlib opcode to actually load bytecode |
|||
| TT #1979 created by coke++: Configure.pl --without-extra-nci-thunks fails tests. | 02:25 | ||
| TT #1979: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1979 | |||
|
02:31
whiteknight left
02:44
simcop2387_ joined
02:45
simcop2387 left
02:46
simcop2387_ is now known as simcop2387
|
|||
| cotto | ~~ | 02:51 | |
| plobsing_ | isparrotfastyet appears to show large amounts of noise. any ideas about any things we've actually done to prompt the spikes and valleys in those graphs? | 02:53 | |
|
03:06
ppant joined
03:25
bacek left
03:36
bacek joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: de841c2 | jkeenan++ | / (13 files): [codingstd] Add functionality to identify Python files. Test those files for copyright. Apply patch submitted in trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1934. |
03:41 | |
| cotto | anyone ever wanted to manage a release? | 04:26 | |
| davidfetter | root canals! get your root canals here! | 04:37 | |
| cotto | davidfetter, thanks for volunteering. You're on 3.4.0. ;] | 04:40 | |
| davidfetter | d'oh! | ||
| dukeleto | lulz | 05:00 | |
| plobsing_: various branch merges that were not benchmarked | |||
| atrodo | I agree, ipfy has some strange noise. I haven't had time to figure out if it's right, the box is doing it, or if the time that I ran it caused the noise | 05:06 | |
| at least I got it running on a cron now | |||
| dukeleto> (re my lorito) coming along. Working on the first real-ish PMCs, but still have a lot of details to fill in | 05:09 | ||
| cotto | atrodo, what's your immediate plan for PMCs? The goal is to have them running on top of the mop. | 05:11 | |
| atrodo | cotto> That's kind of a tricky point, i actually have no plans of any sort of mop. It's a bring your own right now | 05:12 | |
|
05:21
Myhrlin left
05:32
Myhrlin joined
05:35
fbrito left
|
|||
| dalek | rrot/leto/embed_grant: e777870 | dukeleto++ | / (3 files): [t] Move extend_vtable.c tests to their own file |
05:39 | |
|
05:44
Psyche^ joined,
Patterner left,
Psyche^ is now known as Patterner
05:49
rurban_ joined
05:51
rurban left,
rurban_ is now known as rurban
06:23
Myhrlin_ joined
06:24
Myhrlin left,
tcurtis left
|
|||
| dalek | rrot/leto/embed_grant: 6a50542 | dukeleto++ | t/src/extend_vtable.t: [t] Parrot_PMC_(push|pop|shift|unshift)_(float|integer|pmc|string) |
06:30 | |
|
06:37
davidfetter left
06:41
fperrad joined
06:45
fbrito joined
|
|||
| cotto | We seem to have several test failures of late. | 06:46 | |
| dukeleto | also, "make cover-src" doesn't work. It runs tests but doesn't generate a coverage report | 06:47 | |
|
06:47
theory left,
hudnix left
06:48
hudnix joined
|
|||
| dukeleto | blarg. | 06:54 | |
| ignore that. | |||
| it is used as a substep in "make cover" and "make fullcover", so it doesn't generate the coverage report | 06:55 | ||
| dalek | umage: ed71e2f | fperrad++ | setup.pir: use get_submitter from distutils |
06:57 | |
| TT #1980 created by dukeleto++: make cover-src doesn't generate a coverage report | 07:03 | ||
| TT #1980: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1980 | |||
| TT #1980 closed by dukeleto++: make cover-src doesn't generate a coverage report | |||
| TT #1980: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1980 | |||
| cotto | dukeleto, how efficient of you | ||
| dukeleto | cotto: that teaches me to open TT's without researching first | 07:06 | |
| it is pretty hilarious about the IRC announce timings, though :) It actually took me about 3 minutes to realize and close it after opening it | |||
| Parrot_PMC_freeze modifies it's argument. That seems odd to me. | 07:10 | ||
| cotto | I hate it when people modify my arguments. | 07:13 | |
| dukeleto | and, why why why is there something called Parrot_PMC_thawfinish | 07:14 | |
| cotto | dukeleto, how do I tell git that I no longer care about a rebase I started a while ago? | ||
| dukeleto | cotto: git rebase --abort | ||
| cotto: also, you must yell "MISSION ABORTED" at the top of your lungs | |||
| cotto | I didn't try that second part | ||
| dukeleto | a boy can dream | 07:15 | |
| cotto | I love that internal packfile functions rely on the filename extension for determining what to do. | 07:16 | |
| dukeleto | what could go wrong? | 07:19 | |
| cotto | Nothing, ever. That's what. | 07:20 | |
| dalek | rrot: 92f017f | cotto++ | src/packfile/api.c: split compile_or_load_file into separate functions |
||
| dukeleto | seems like thawfinish should have been called after_thaw | 07:25 | |
| cotto | pshaw | 07:26 | |
| such sensibilities are quaint | |||
|
07:28
ppant left
|
|||
| cotto | dukeleto, is it somehow not? According to the small pieces of the serialization code I haven't repressed from my memory, that's what it's supposed to do. | 07:29 | |
| dukeleto | yeah, i guess i make a distinction between "finishing" a process, and something that happens after a process | 07:33 | |
| in Moose, there are hooks such as before, around and after | |||
| which you can apply to any method call | |||
| "finishing" a thaw implies it isn't done yet | |||
| but it is just semantics | 07:34 | ||
| and not worth changing, unless we are changing something else | |||
| but i guess there is a "partial thaw" with is just thaw() and a "full thaw" is thaw+thawfinish | |||
| at least that is what I understand so far | |||
| mj41 | AutomatedHLLTesting looks like TapTinder ToDo list. - trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/AutomatedHLLTesting | 07:42 | |
| dukeleto | mj41: go for it! | 07:43 | |
| i just found out that parrot's test suite knows about an env var called POSTMORTEM | 07:44 | ||
| mj41 | dukeleto: I'm doing my best :-). | 07:45 | |
| dukeleto | msg whiteknight you can set POSTMODERM in your shell and parrot will keep around object files and binaries for t/src/* tests. I think I heard you wanting that recently | ||
| aloha | OK. I'll deliver the message. | ||
| cotto | dukeleto, nice find | 07:47 | |
| dukeleto | Either I don't know how to use it, or Parrot_PMC_thaw doesn't work | 07:48 | |
| cotto | Having met both you and Parrot, I'd tend to trust you. | 07:50 | |
| dukeleto | i am probably not fiddling some bit, but it is not intuitive what you need to do to freeze a PMC from C | 07:51 | |
| cotto | It's a known mess. | 07:52 | |
| dalek | rrot/leto/embed_grant: eb09311 | dukeleto++ | t/src/extend_vtable.t: [t] Parrot_PMC_elements and a commented-out test for Parrot_PMC_thaw that blows up |
07:59 | |
| cotto | dukeleto, when's all that work going to be merged? | 08:05 | |
| dukeleto | cotto: most of it was merged before 3.0.0 | 08:06 | |
| cotto: my leto/embed_grant branch gets periodically merged to master | |||
| cotto: i am having issues generating my own coverage reports, so I pretty much need to merge to master to get a coverage report | 08:07 | ||
| cotto | dukeleto, odd | ||
| dukeleto | cotto: "make fullcover" generates a huge number of *.html in the root of my repo, but not the coverge.html file | 08:08 | |
| cotto: and "make cover" doesn't do t/src | |||
| cotto | Those yaks are surprisingly good at hiding. | 08:09 | |
| dukeleto | The yaks are starting to cross-breed with chameleons | ||
| cotto | disturbing | ||
| dukeleto | cotto: yes. And now, I go to bed. | ||
| cotto | 'night | ||
| cotto too | 08:10 | ||
| dukeleto | cotto: may the yaks tread on you gently | ||
| dalek | tracwiki: v9 | cotto++ | PackfileTasklist | 08:19 | |
| tracwiki: various updates | |||
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/Packfil...ction=diff | |||
|
08:20
vmspb joined
08:33
contingencyplan left
08:44
cogno joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: f2af827 | jimmy++ | config/ (3 files): fixed TT# 1873 |
08:48 | |
|
09:03
cogno left
09:04
cogno joined
09:32
jjore_ left
09:34
jjore joined
|
|||
| dalek | gest-dynpmcs: e411a12 | fperrad++ | src/pmc/digest_pmc.in: use binary encoding |
09:35 | |
|
09:41
cogno left
09:48
mikehh left
09:59
mikehh joined
10:17
cogno joined
10:28
cogno left
10:34
vmspb left
11:10
cogno joined
11:15
JimmyZ joined
11:19
JimmyZ left
11:20
cogno left
11:39
JimmyZ joined
11:41
fbrito left,
fbrito joined
11:43
cogno joined
11:47
GeJ_ is now known as GeJ
11:59
cogno left,
fperrad_ joined
12:01
fperrad left,
fperrad_ is now known as fperrad
12:46
jimmy joined,
jimmy left
12:53
cogno joined
13:05
fbrito1 joined
13:06
fperrad left
13:07
fbrito left
13:08
fperrad joined
13:11
cogno left,
cogno joined
13:29
JimmyZ left
13:41
fbrito1 left
13:49
rurban_ joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: 858c70b | fperrad++ | runtime/parrot/library/distutils.pir: [distutils] by default add Submitter as extra props |
13:49 | |
|
13:51
mtk joined,
rurban left,
rurban_ is now known as rurban
13:58
JimmyZ joined
13:59
whiteknight joined
14:11
spinclad left
14:16
mtk left,
mtk joined
14:17
plobsing_ left
14:20
cogno left
14:25
mtk left,
mtk joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | good morning, #parrot | 14:49 | |
| JimmyZ | good morning, whiteknight | 14:50 | |
|
14:53
mtk left
14:54
mtk joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | hello JimmyZ | 14:55 | |
| JimmyZ | Hi :) | ||
|
14:56
mberends left
15:00
mtk left
15:01
mtk joined
|
|||
| dalek | nxed: r735 | NotFound++ | trunk/winxedst1.winxed: refactor handling of predefined functions and better diagnose its misuses |
15:09 | |
|
15:10
ambs joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: f2848b0 | mikehh++ | docs/pdds/pdd10_embedding.pod: add a space in heading to conform to other pdd's headings |
15:19 | |
| nxed: r736 | NotFound++ | trunk/winxedst1.winxed: delete several commented out statements |
15:20 | ||
|
15:25
hercynium joined
15:34
bluescreen joined
|
|||
| mikehh | whiteknight: I just got a failure with t/pmc/threads.t - Failed test: 8 - smoke #3919, ran it again straight away no failure - smoke #3920 | 15:36 | |
| whiteknight: just thought you might like to know :-} | 15:37 | ||
| whiteknight | mikehh: I'm positive there are timing issues in those tests | 15:38 | |
| the system they are testing is bad, and the tests are poorly written | |||
| Any tests for threads which relies on a specific ordering of output text is likely going to fail occasionally | |||
|
15:42
plobsing joined
|
|||
| mikehh | whiteknight: I have been getting intermittent failyres with that test (t/pmc/threads.t) for ages | 15:45 | |
| failures | |||
| not all that often, I haven't recorded it but 5% or less | 15:48 | ||
| All tests PASS (pre/post-config, make corevm/make coretest, smoke (#3920) fulltest) at 3_0_0-89-gf2848b0 - Ubuntu 10.10 i386 (g++-4.5) | 15:53 | ||
| apart from an intermittent failure with t/pmc/threads.t - Failed test: 8 in smoke #3919 which I reran to get no failures in smoke #3920 | |||
| dalek | nxed: r737 | NotFound++ | trunk/winxedst1.winxed: tailcal function literal invocation, Issue 11, plobsing++ |
||
| Coke | seen mpeters | 16:02 | |
| aloha | Sorry, I haven't seen mpeters. | ||
| Coke | smolder.parrot.org/app/projects/tes...tory/1/231 - t/pmc/threads.t failures. | 16:03 | |
| I believe that is due to the --without-extra-nci-thunks option. | 16:04 | ||
|
16:05
theory joined
|
|||
| Coke | whoops. nope. | 16:05 | |
| bah, that smolder link, if you click on the one with failurs, you get... whitescreen. | |||
| mikehh | Coke: it only gives a list of 20 tests, we need to be able to look at more | 16:07 | |
|
16:07
pmichaud left
|
|||
| Coke | smolder is configured to only keep N tests. | 16:08 | |
|
16:08
pmichaud joined
|
|||
| Coke | and folks in parrotsketch were all crazy about running out of disk space. ;) | 16:08 | |
| but we can bump it up a bit for parrot, sure. Lemme change that number. | 16:09 | ||
| mikehh | both #3919 (which had a failure) and #3920 were run with the same build (options -> --test --cc=g++ --cxx=g++ --link=g++ --ld=g++ --configure_trace) | 16:10 | |
| Coke | mikehh: parrot now saves 250 full reports instead of just 100. | ||
|
16:11
JimmyZ left
|
|||
| tadzik | hello | 16:19 | |
|
16:22
cogno joined,
contingencyplan joined
|
|||
| plobsing | ping whiteknight | 16:26 | |
| whiteknight | pong | ||
| plobsing | just read your recent blog post. why do you want to move the GC and context stuff out of IMCC? | 16:27 | |
| only IMCC should know about the dain bramage that requires those stunts | |||
| whiteknight | IMCC shouldn't presume to know whether Parrot's GC is blocked or not, or whether it's in a sufficient context or it needs to create one | 16:28 | |
| IMCC should certainly not be in the business of creating contexts | 16:29 | ||
| the GC thing I'm less certain about, but I still don't think IMCC should be in control of it | |||
| plobsing | but IMCC *requires* that a context be in place (for :immediate subs, :postcomb subs, constant folding, ...). if it cannot assume one is in place, it should create one. | 16:30 | |
| same for GC. IMCC will break badly with GC enabled. callers should not need to know about this. | 16:33 | ||
| atrodo | So perhaps I'm confused, but does that mean that IMCC is what is actually running the bytecode? | ||
| plobsing | IMCC does execute code, yes | ||
|
16:34
mtk left
|
|||
| whiteknight | IMCC doesn't necesarily require a context be in place, only some of it's interfaces do | 16:34 | |
|
16:34
cogno left
|
|||
| whiteknight | and for those we can have a function in libparrot that sets it up | 16:34 | |
| There are 6 separate interface functions to IMCC that make all sorts of different assumptions. I am going to whittle this down to two interface functions and consolidate a hell of a lot of code | 16:35 | ||
| I'm going to create two good interface functions for IMCC, wrap them up in a nice, self-contained PMC type for the purpose, and use that PMC type exclusively to interact with IMCC | 16:37 | ||
| I'm going to store IMCC state information in this PMC type, not in interp->imcc_info anymore. Then IMCC_INFO(interp) becomes just an info parameter, and interp becomes PARROT_INTERP(imcc_info) instead | 16:38 | ||
| plobsing | why a PMC type? you should be able to do it with a real (PIR) object | ||
| whiteknight | plobsing: It doesn't have to be a built-in PMC type | 16:39 | |
| but it should be a PMC with methods of some variety | |||
| what language that PMC is written in does not concern me, though the initial implementation will probably be C if I'm writing it | |||
| plobsing | ok. its just that sometimes I feel we have the wrong defaults on the builtin/addon and C/HLL PMC choice | 16:40 | |
|
16:40
mtk joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | plobsing: At the moment, the Parrot executable frontend is written in C, and we need to get into IMCC before we have a runloop created | 16:40 | |
| In the future, I want to "fix" that, and have a short PIR entrypoint program that sets up IMCC, processes arguments, and then calls into the main program packfile | 16:41 | ||
| but that's a few steps down the road | |||
| NotFound | We can also create a class on the fly and add C mehods to it via nci. | ||
| whiteknight | right, we can do a lot of things. The initial implemenations will be simple while we move towards bigger and better things | ||
| Right now, libparrot calls imcc_init to set up the PIR and PASM compregs. If we can do all this in a stub PIR entry point instead, we no longer rely on IMCC being built-in | 16:43 | ||
| and at that point, we can define the IMCC compreg in PIR | |||
| and nobody will be the wiser | |||
| An initial PIR compreg right now really only needs to override VTABLE_invoke to have the same behaviors as the current compreg does. We can add in a 'compile' method to start easing the transition | 16:47 | ||
| so rewriting that in PIR won't be too much of a headache. Once it's in PIR we can add all the fun new features we want | 16:48 | ||
|
16:48
cogno joined
|
|||
| plobsing | where does packfile pmcs fit in to this? I'd like to get cracking on that, but I can guarrantee it will have merge conflicts with whatever other improvements are happening concurrently. | 16:50 | |
| whiteknight | The IMCC compiler and all other compilers are going to be returning PackFile PMCs instead of Eval PMCs. It also won't automatically shallow-merge those new PackFiles into parrot's interp->initial_pf | 16:51 | |
| so from there we can write a PIR frontend to Parrot that compilers PIR files to PackFiles and writes them out as .pbcs | |||
| nopaste | "NotFound" at 192.168.1.3 pasted "A bare minimal HLL-like interface to PIR" (33 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/28195 | ||
| whiteknight | NotFound: Right. Something simple like that would be very easy to do | 16:52 | |
| plobsing | NotFound: does winxed have that french-quote syntax?? | 16:53 | |
| NotFound | plobsing: yes, it's its heredoc syntax. | 16:54 | |
| plobsing | whiteknight: right. I understand they need to happen. What I am saying is I don't want to have to wade through a sea of merge conflicts when I try to get them. | 16:55 | |
| whiteknight | plobsing. Okay, I see what you are saying. I'm working right now on fixing up subclassable exceptions | 16:56 | |
| in a few days, I'm getting back to IMCC and updating the IMCC interface to have less suck | |||
| then I'm going to work on a new prototype PIR compiler PMC type, but I won't insert it as the PIR compreg yet | |||
| so that takes me up to 3.1 or 3.2 | 16:57 | ||
| plobsing | whiteknight: on that subject, I've run into yet more exception issues and am unconvinced our current approach to them is the right one. | 16:58 | |
| whiteknight | plobsing: probably not. I'd love to hear your thoughts | ||
| plobsing | thrown objects should be recyclable. more than that, they should be re-entrantly throwable. | 16:59 | |
| whiteknight | We had an ExceptionsTasklist page on the wiki, but it's mostly empty. You want to start ranting and I'll transcribe? | ||
| what do you mean "re-entrantly throwable".Like rethrow? | |||
| plobsing | that is, I should be able to invoke a continuation from an exception handler that throws the exact same object and have 2 concurrently running, independant exception handlers for exceptions with the same object. | 17:00 | |
| the handler chains for each should be completely separate. | |||
| whiteknight | I'm not sure how that works. if you invoke the continuation, control flow leaves the initial handler | 17:01 | |
| plobsing | which means the thrown object is *not* the place to store them | ||
| whiteknight | are you talking about more than one thread? | ||
| plobsing | whiteknight: not even. coroutines can encounter these issues. | ||
| each coroutine can be in the midst of handling an exception | 17:02 | ||
| NotFound | That may explain some coroutine issues. | ||
| whiteknight | down this path lies danger, methinks. I wouldn't worry about it if not for inferior runloops and finalize | 17:03 | |
| plobsing | this has nothing to do with either of those things | ||
| coroutines can exist within the same runloop | |||
| whiteknight | it does. We need to completely handle and finalize, an exception before we can re-handle it or handle a different one | ||
| maybe I'm just not understanding what you are saying. Could you put together a small code example? | 17:04 | ||
| brb, I'm going to go grab a sandwich | 17:05 | ||
| NotFound | plobsing: do you mean a coroutine that yields in the middle of an expection handler? | 17:07 | |
| plobsing | NotFound: that can happen, yes | 17:08 | |
| but is just one case of a more general control-flow issue | 17:09 | ||
| and the lesser problem of re-usable (as opposed to re-entrant) exceptions is already experienced by Ωη. | 17:10 | ||
| Ωη uses exception-object identity as part of its calling convention. Switching to rethrow changes the identity. | |||
| so Ωη cannot use rethrow | 17:11 | ||
| or something like that. all I know ATM is rethrow in stead of throw causes a lot of failures | |||
| whiteknight | what do you mean exception identity? it would be the same exception and the same pointer to it | 17:12 | |
| plobsing | whiteknight: exactly. Ωη uses an exception singleton to indicate failed match, and allows all other exceptions to propagate. | 17:14 | |
| if (e !== fail) { throw e; /* propagate */ } | 17:15 | ||
| whiteknight | okay, and replacing rethrow there causes failure? | 17:16 | |
| plobsing | yes. because match-failed errors are no longer the same object. | 17:17 | |
| whiteknight | rethrow sets the handled attribute to -1. so if you were doing a VTABLE_equals instead of VTABLE_same it would come back different | 17:18 | |
| and it shifts out one of the handlers from the iter | 17:19 | ||
| but other than that, it's the same PMC | |||
|
17:19
bluescreen left
|
|||
| whiteknight | if you're seeing weird failures, it's likely a bug | 17:21 | |
| plobsing | in winxed, ===/!=== has nothing to do with vtables | 17:24 | |
|
17:24
ambs left
|
|||
| plobsing | s/!=/!/ | 17:24 | |
| NotFound | plobsing: it has. issame and isntsame first check PMC * equality, then call VTABLE_is_same | 17:26 | |
|
17:27
cogno left
|
|||
| plobsing | NotFound: eq_addr/ne_addr do not | 17:27 | |
|
17:27
ambs joined
17:28
cogno joined
|
|||
| NotFound | plobsing: winxed uses issame and isntsame. | 17:29 | |
| plobsing | NotFound: OpSameExpr.emitop_if | 17:30 | |
| dukeleto | ~~ | ||
|
17:30
bluescreen joined
|
|||
| tadzik | hello dukeleto | 17:31 | |
| dukeleto | tadzik: wazzup | ||
| tadzik | Uninsane | ||
| NotFound | Mmm... something wrong here. | ||
| plobsing | I think the concept of address-equality is useful | ||
| dukeleto | tadzik: busy with school, or hacking on parrot stuff? | 17:32 | |
| NotFound | The problem is that currently !== and === do differents thing depending on its usage. | 17:34 | |
| tadzik | dukeleto: busy with school. Like 15 minutes ago everybody on my semester got to know that tomorrow's labs are not from Async FSMs, but from Microcontrollers. Madness | ||
| NotFound | But I don't think that may explain your problem. | ||
| plobsing | my problem is this: if I throw, rethrow, and reuse for exceptions an object, somewhere down the line, a new object gets created (which doesn't have the same address) | 17:38 | |
|
17:39
ambs left
|
|||
| plobsing grabs lunch | 17:40 | ||
| dukeleto | Interesting new implementation of Smalltalk on Rubinius: github.com/rkh/Reak | ||
|
17:43
ambs joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | plobsing: That definitely sounds like a bug to me. If you can track that down to a test case, I'll fix it for you | 17:43 | |
|
17:45
ambs_ joined,
ambs left,
ambs_ is now known as ambs
17:46
plobsing left
|
|||
| NotFound | I can reproduce it with a short example. | 17:48 | |
| But it looks like the problem is not !== failing, looks like the handler gets disabled. | 17:49 | ||
| whiteknight | does handler get disabled on rethrow? | 18:01 | |
| NotFound | winxed does finalize and pop_eh at the start of the catch block, so I'm not sure what's exactly happening. | 18:02 | |
| whiteknight | I found some problems with the finalize op in my exceptions branch, I need to fix it | 18:03 | |
| NotFound | The problem is not in rethrow, is the next throw with the same exception object what fails. | 18:04 | |
| whiteknight | so using throw after rethrow? | 18:07 | |
| throw->rethrow->throw fails? | |||
| NotFound | Yes | ||
| whiteknight | Can you write a PIR test case for me? I'll fix it soon | ||
| cotto_work | good morning | 18:08 | |
| whiteknight | good morning, cotto_work | ||
| dukeleto | cotto_work: wilkommen! | ||
|
18:13
cogno left
|
|||
| cotto_work | whiteknight: awesome blogging. | 18:21 | |
| whiteknight | thanks! I've been such a damn lump lately with it. I'm trying to get back into the swing | 18:22 | |
| I am working on a post for tomorrow that has a lot of fun new ideas in it | |||
| nopaste | "NotFound" at 192.168.1.3 pasted "throw - rethrow pir example" (62 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/28199 | 18:23 | |
| NotFound | whiteknight: here is | ||
|
18:26
JimmyZ joined
|
|||
| JimmyZ | cotto_work: good morning | 18:27 | |
| whiteknight | NotFound++ | ||
| cotto_work | JimmyZ: good evening | 18:28 | |
| JimmyZ | hehe | ||
| cotto_work: github.com/parrot/parrot/commit/f2af827fca | 18:29 | ||
|
18:35
plobsing_ joined
|
|||
| NotFound | plobsing_: take a look at this: nopaste.snit.ch/28199 | 18:39 | |
|
18:41
JimmyZ left
|
|||
| dalek | Heuristic branch merge: pushed 77 commits to parrot/nwellnhof/unicode_filenames by nwellnhof | 18:44 | |
| whiteknight | the github wikis are getting more and more attractive looking | 18:45 | |
| the ability to write pages in POD, the ability to download the entire wiki as a git repo (and can submit pull requests on them), to have access restrictions managed by github, these are all very attractive features | 18:46 | ||
|
18:47
cogno joined
|
|||
| plobsing_ | but github bugtracker ticket numbers are not stable | 18:47 | |
| close ticket 1, all tickets get renumbered | |||
| not yet an acceptable trac substitute | |||
| cotto_work | how are you supposed to link to a ticket? | ||
| whiteknight | yes, you're right. The github issue tracker is still the weak link in the chain | 18:48 | |
| I've never been happy with it | |||
| cotto_work wishes for git-backed trac | |||
| whiteknight | You can link to a ticket from the github wiki, they do have a markup for that | ||
| but plobsing is right that the feature won't be great to use until the issue tracker stops sucking | |||
| ability to edit POD docs in an online WYSIWYG editer has me salivating | 18:50 | ||
| NotFound: Can you explain that code example to me? when I run it, it fails with unhandled exception and prints a backtrace | 18:52 | ||
| plobsing_ | whiteknight: the unhandled exception is happening *within* the catch3 part (which should catch the exception) | 18:53 | |
|
18:53
nwellnhof joined
|
|||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: i talked to some Github peeps at the Git Together, and they say some awesome stuff is coming down the line, such as online conflict resolution, and more configurable timelines | 18:53 | |
| whiteknight | dukeleto: That's all very good to hear, but the issue tracker is still garbage and unusable | 18:54 | |
| All the other features are great, but the issue trackers are bad | |||
| if they could radically improve issue trackers, so that they were as functional as what Trac offers, I would switch to it in a heartbeat | |||
| nwellnhof | whiteknight: in nwellnhof/unicode_filenames i made some changes to the embed api. i'd like to know what you about them. | 18:55 | |
| whiteknight | a git-based issue tracker that I could clone and search/update/manipulate locally would be awesome, but I suspect pretty far away | ||
| nwellnhof: okay, awesome. I'll take a gander | |||
| nwellnhof | i changed Parrot_api_load_bytecode_file and Parrot_api_wrap_imcc_hack to accept Parrot_String instead of const char *. | ||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: i guess you get what you pay for | ||
| whiteknight | plobsing: I'm not sure I understand why catch3 is throwing an exception, or what that's supposed to prove | 18:56 | |
| nwellnhof | whiteknight: then i added Parrot_api_string_import which accepts a string in the platform encoding. | ||
| cotto_work | dukeleto: We get way more than we pay for. | ||
| which is good, given our budget | |||
| plobsing_ | whiteknight: sd bugtracker might be something you would find interesting (can work git-based IIRC) | ||
| whiteknight | dukeleto: true, but we're not paying for Trac either. Also, it's possible in the future that PaFo could be paying for service on Github | ||
| nwellnhof | whiteknight: and i added an encoding argument to Parrot_api_string_import_binary | 18:57 | |
| NotFound | whiteknight: that is the problem, the last exception handler doesn't catch the exception. | ||
| whiteknight | NotFound: Oh | ||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: not if we have our non-profit docs in order. Github gives away private repos and increased disk space to non-profits | 18:58 | |
| dalek | rrot/nwellnhof/unicode_filenames: 72f7f5a | nwellnhof++ | / (29 files): Merge branch 'master' into nwellnhof/unicode_filenames Conflicts: \tcompilers/imcc/main.c \tsrc/packfile/api.c \tt/src/embed/api.t |
||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: and we are hosting our own Trac instance. Not the same. | ||
| whiteknight | dukeleto: Right. Regardless, if we had money to pay for a good host like Github, I wouldn't mind paying it | ||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: indeed. | 18:59 | |
| whiteknight: we already changed ticket systems once. I don't know if we will again. I was barely involved, but it seemed at least as painful as the svn -> git migration | |||
| NotFound sings 'If I were a rich man' | 19:00 | ||
| cotto_work | dukeleto: it was not pleasant | ||
| though it was also not especially well-communicated, iirc | |||
| whiteknight | I disagree. I think it was not so bad. If it was bad, it was because we had so much cruft built up in RT | ||
| plobsing_ | we should fully separate exception information from the thrown object. Exception should be an implementation detail for the ephemeral information and throwers should not be required to know about it. | ||
| whiteknight | It was a lot of work, but many many tickets got triaged in place, not migrated | 19:01 | |
| cotto_work | not as much work as svn->git though | ||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: yeah, the svn -> git migration was such a pain, it is hard to compare it to other things | ||
| cotto_work | I think that much of the effort was because it's exhausting to look through every ticket, let alone decide which ones to migrate. | 19:02 | |
| whiteknight | The issue isn't that migrating issue trackers is hard. The issue is that we're very bad at managing our ticket queues | ||
| NotFound | All your exception are thrown to us! | ||
| whiteknight | we let too much crap build up in there. We have too many tickets that will never close | ||
| cotto_work throws a NotFoundException | |||
| whiteknight | not without somebody taking initiative and saying "forget this this. WONTFIX" | ||
| cotto_work | whiteknight: I love doing that. | 19:03 | |
| whiteknight | me too. It's good to say "there isn't enough information. I can't reproduce it. Forget it" | ||
| dukeleto | i think we need some rule like "if a ticket hasn't been touched in 2 years, WONTFIX it" | ||
| whiteknight | or ALREADYFIXED it | ||
| dukeleto | anything else is just lying to ourselves | ||
| whiteknight | exactly | ||
| dukeleto | i think we need some similar policy for old branches, but I don't want to delete old branches. I have been thinking that any branch that hasn't been touched in at least a year gets moved to the historical/ prefix | 19:04 | |
| NotFound | Histerical? | ||
| whiteknight | I was thinking almost the same with any branch more than ~5000 commits behind master | ||
| dukeleto | so that future parrot historians can mine it for historical significance | ||
| whiteknight: sure. the actual rule isn't important, just that we have some kind of cut-off that says "this branch will most likely never be merged" | 19:05 | ||
| also, some branches were interesting explorations, but we know they will never be merged, so we can put those in historical/ too | |||
| whiteknight | Some branches just get forgotten. I have about 3 or 4 that I can delete tomorrow if I can talk to chromatic about them | ||
| two more I can delete by the end of the week because they've been superceeded | |||
| dukeleto: Just having the branch doesn't help nearly so much as a short written summary of what was attempted | 19:06 | ||
| and if we can't even figure out if the branch is viable, there's no way we're going to get a summary written | |||
|
19:07
plobsing_ left
|
|||
| dukeleto | whiteknight: that is what commit messages are for | 19:08 | |
| whiteknight: i just want to sort out "branches that are currently being worked on" from "branches that are dormant" | 19:09 | ||
| whiteknight | NotFound: This example you wrote up is interesting and troubling | 19:11 | |
| cotto_work | at least the dormant branches are trivially easy to find now | ||
| NotFound | whiteknight: yeah | ||
|
19:12
KatrinaTheLamia left,
davidfetter joined
|
|||
| nopaste | "whiteknight" at 192.168.1.3 pasted "working example for NotFound++" (65 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/28204 | 19:13 | |
| whiteknight | NotFound: if I add in a second handler, catch4, it works | 19:14 | |
| if you take out the push_eh catch4, it fails again | |||
| even though count_eh says there is 1 handler | |||
| very very interesting | |||
| somehow, a rethrown PMC is skipping 2 handlers in it's iterator | 19:15 | ||
| if I replace the last fail with a fail_re, we get weird behavior too | |||
| the fail_re throws, but never rethrows | |||
| NotFound | Very nice | 19:16 | |
| whiteknight | so I think that rethrow is causing the iter to get 1 element ahead | ||
| NotFound | boycottameetingday.com/ | ||
| whiteknight | so it skips a handler | ||
| NotFound | Not related, but inspiring page. | ||
|
19:17
Eclesia joined
|
|||
| Eclesia | hi | 19:17 | |
| atrodo | NotFound> I just saw that too. That TED talk was one of the least impressive I've seen, which is strange | ||
| NotFound | Sometimes I go to meetings with the Nintendo DS just in case | 19:20 | |
|
19:22
plobsing_ joined
19:29
bluescreen left
|
|||
| dukeleto is seeing lots of new warnings on master | 19:33 | ||
| src/embed/pmc.c: In function ‘Parrot_api_pmc_find_method’: | |||
| src/embed/pmc.c:584: warning: variable ‘interp’ might be clobbered by ‘longjmp’ or ‘vfork’ | |||
| sounds dicey | |||
| dalek | rrot/rethrow_madness: ea68a95 | Whiteknight++ | t/op/rethrow.t: add failing test case from NotFound++ to illustrate the problem |
19:34 | |
| rrot/rethrow_madness: 777bd1b | Whiteknight++ | t/op/rethrow.t: narrow down the test a little bit more |
|||
| whiteknight | dukeleto: I'll take a look at that one later. What compiler you using? | 19:35 | |
| dukeleto | whiteknight: gcc 4.4.3 | 19:38 | |
| Eclesia | I just pulled the latest parrot and tryedto compile it but I have this error : pastebin.com/m4Ue2bSU | 19:43 | |
| I'm not familiar with 'make' compilation, anyone could have a look ? | |||
|
19:44
bluescreen joined
|
|||
| atrodo | Eclesia> have you installed parrot before? | 19:44 | |
| Eclesia | yes | ||
| cotto_work | dukeleto++ | ||
| Eclesia | atrodo: I must uninstall it ? | 19:45 | |
| atrodo | Not sure how to solve it, but that's where that error comes from. | ||
| cotto_work | Eclesia: it looks like Parrot is finding some old bytecode. | ||
| plobsing_ | the problem is that our makefile doesn't have all pbc files depending on PBC_COMPAT | ||
| so old pbc doesn't always get regenerated | |||
| atrodo | Eclesia> That's what I've done in the past, but I suspect there's a way around it that I'm unaware o | 19:46 | |
| cotto_work | Eclesia: did you just update git? You'll probably need to do make reconfig | ||
| *update a git clone | |||
| Eclesia | I made : git pull , perl Configure.pl , make nothing else | ||
| cotto_work | ok. reconfig is better. It'll clobber anything that might be out of date and rerun configure.pl | 19:47 | |
| Eclesia | ok | ||
| plobsing_ | like I said, some old PBC is not catching the PBC_COMPAT change. the quick fix is 'make realclean; perl Configure.pl; make' | ||
| the full fix, for someone who likes makefile munging, is to update the deps of the offending PBC files. | 19:48 | ||
| cotto_work | Yeah. The need for reconfig is basically scar tissue that we've built to deal with poor pbc dependencies. | 19:49 | |
| dalek | rrot: 09258d5 | dukeleto++ | / (2 files): [TT #1965] Make the Rational PMC act sanely when used in a boolean context, doughera++ |
||
| Eclesia | I'm not familiar with all this sorry. :D (Learn programming asm > vb > java , but not C/C++ so first time I really play with makefiles) | 19:50 | |
|
19:50
cogno left
|
|||
| cotto_work | Eclesia: don't worry about it then. Just run reconfig often. | 19:51 | |
| (which is a shortcut for make realclean && perl Configure.pl) | |||
| whiteknight | dukeleto: Can you open a ticket for me with those warnings? I want to work on them and I don't want to forget it | 19:52 | |
| Eclesia | cotto_work: thanks, it worked this time | ||
| cotto_work | Eclesia: Glad to hear it . Thanks for being patient. | ||
| Eclesia | no problem, if you want me to test stuffs on my pc (not to complicated). I'll be glad to help a little when I have time. :) | 19:54 | |
|
19:54
wagle left
|
|||
| dalek | TT #1965 closed by dukeleto++: rational.pmc's get_bool is backwards and not portable | 19:55 | |
| TT #1965: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1965 | |||
| plobsing_ | I'd argue that rational.pmc's get_bool is still backwards | 19:56 | |
| at least it is portable now though | |||
| dukeleto | Eclesia: do you need stuff to work on? I can suggest some easy tickets for you to cut your beak on :) | 19:57 | |
|
19:57
wagle joined
|
|||
| dukeleto | Eclesia: git clean -fdx will wipe out any compile-cruft from your git repo, but make sure you don't have any uncommitted files that you care about! | 19:58 | |
| Eclesia: and you will often need to "make realclean" after you update your parrot.git repo | |||
| Coke | (issue tracker you can clone and work on locally) - it may not be git, but obra already wrote that. | ||
| dukeleto | Eclesia: github.com/leto/Util/blob/master/bin/new_parrot <-- you can steal that for an easy way to compile new a parrot | 19:59 | |
| Coke | (ticket migration at least as painful) HAHA HA HA HA. | ||
| cotto_work | Coke: I thought you might have some thoughts. | ||
| Coke | (it was a complete and utter (&*# waste of time and energy. I would not recommend repeating it.) | ||
| dukeleto | Coke: :) | ||
| Coke | (wontfixing based on age alone) bad idea. wontfix it based on wontfixing it. | 20:00 | |
|
20:01
cogno joined
|
|||
| Coke | Eclesia: you either need to use a more recent parrot, or remove your install directory and re-install. | 20:01 | |
| TimToady | phone? | ||
| Eclesia | Coke: the problem is solved :) the realclean did the trick | ||
| dukeleto | Eclesia: that script assumed that you put $PWD/installed_parrot in your $PATH and that you are updating the git repo with something like "git pull --rebase" | ||
| Coke | Eclesia: awesome. | 20:02 | |
| dukeleto | Eclesia: note that my new_parrot script does that already, for you :) | ||
| Eclesia | I made my small script already | ||
| dukeleto | Eclesia: to each their own | 20:04 | |
| dalek | Heuristic branch merge: pushed 100 commits to parrot/nwellnhof/platform_src by nwellnhof | ||
| Eclesia | question : when building parrot, I seen a line about opengl available or not on my pc. does that mean parrot contain a low level api for rendering ? | 20:10 | |
| or is it a plan for parralal computation on the gpu ? | |||
| plobsing_ | Eclesia: it contains a relatively small, simple library binding to OpenGL | 20:11 | |
| simple in the sense that it forwards the C API to you, not in the sense of "easy to use" | |||
| NotFound | Eclesia: see examples/opengl/ | ||
| dalek | TT #1981 created by dukeleto++: Many new warnings like: warning: variable ‘interp’ might be clobbered by ... | 20:12 | |
| TT #1981: trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/1981 | |||
| dukeleto | Eclesia: and our opengl bindings are known to have some problems on OS X, in case that is important to you | ||
| Eclesia | nope, I'm on mint | ||
| nwellnhof | dukeleto: have you been able to test nwellnhof/platform_src on a bsd system by chance? | 20:13 | |
| dukeleto | nwellnhof: i have not, but I can try now. Do you care between FreeBSD or OpenBSD ? | 20:15 | |
| nwellnhof | dukeleto: any bsd should be fine | ||
| whiteknight | nwellnhof: The API work you've done looks good. The IMCC work you've done looks pretty good too. | 20:16 | |
| so big +1 from me | |||
| I wish we didn't have to use the PIO_* macros in IMCC, but I guess it can't be helped | 20:18 | ||
| unless we wanted to convert IMCC over whole-hog to reading input from an IO PMC instead of a low-level file handle | |||
| and there probably isn't any real reason to make that kind of a change | 20:19 | ||
| nwellnhof | whiteknight: i will replace the PIO_* macros with direct function calls like Parrot_io_* after platform_src has been merged | 20:20 | |
| i also tried to make IMCC read whole input files before, but i see no reason to do it. it only makes things more complicated. | 20:22 | ||
| NotFound | There is a reason but I don't think PIO is ready for that: being able to read UTF16 and UTF32 pir sources. | 20:24 | |
| nwellnhof | NotFound: PIO is ready for that now | ||
| NotFound | nwellnhof: good | 20:25 | |
| whiteknight | nwellnhof: Let me know when you try to make changes like that to IMCC. I have some work I want to do in IMCC in the near future, and I don't want to conflict with you | ||
| let me know when you're working on it, and I'll go do something else for a while | |||
|
20:27
fperrad left
20:33
cogno_ joined
20:35
hudnix left,
cogno left
|
|||
| nwellnhof | whiteknight: besides the unicode filename thing, i have no other plans regarding imcc | 20:37 | |
| dukeleto | nwellnhof: i am compiling platform_src on openbsd now | 20:42 | |
| nwellnhof | dukeleto: great, thanks a lot | ||
| dalek | rrot/nwellnhof/unicode_filenames: 542c524 | nwellnhof++ | compilers/imcc/main.c: Fix for filenames in IMCC error messages |
20:44 | |
| nxed: r738 | NotFound++ | trunk/winxed (2 files): set exit values in stage 1 compiler and check them in the driver |
|||
|
20:48
hudnix joined
|
|||
| dukeleto | nwellnhof: build was successful. Gonna run "make smoke" now | 20:49 | |
| nwellnhof: crap! | |||
| nwellnhof: i ssh'ed to the wrong machine. It was a linux machine. d'oh! | 20:50 | ||
| dalek | rrot/nwellnhof/unicode_filenames: 8588a4c | nwellnhof++ | compilers/imcc/imc (2 files): [codingstd] Wrap macro args |
20:51 | |
|
20:53
particle1 joined,
perlite_ joined
20:55
plobsing_ left
20:56
particle left
20:57
perlite left,
perlite_ is now known as perlite
|
|||
| Eclesia | question, in pir files, what is the difference between # lines and text between = | 21:04 | |
| cotto_work | Eclesia: can you give an example of what you're talking about? | 21:05 | |
| Eclesia | pastebin.com/bnfGQbJa | ||
| GeJ | Bonjour everyone. | 21:06 | |
| cotto_work | Ah. Look up Pod. It's one of the supported documentation formats in PIR. | ||
| Eclesia | hi GeJ, you are french ? | ||
| pod ? | 21:07 | ||
| some kind of javadoc ? | |||
| cotto_work | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plain_Old_Documentation | ||
| GeJ | Eclesia: that would be correct. | 21:08 | |
| Eclesia | so bonsoir Gej :) | 21:09 | |
| dukeleto | Eclesia: # are comments, stuff between = is documentation | ||
| GeJ | Eclesia: Exactly, bonjour Eclesia. | ||
| dukeleto | Eclesia: perldoc somefile | 21:10 | |
| Eclesia | ok, so I can remove then without breaking anything ^^ | ||
| dukeleto | Eclesia: Parrot puts POD in many files, not just Perl files. That is a bit non-standard, but you can run perldoc on any file | ||
| dalek | rrot/nwellnhof/platform_src: cd1a670 | nwellnhof++ | / (2 files): [codingstd] Run headerizer, fix enum |
||
|
21:12
bacek left
|
|||
| whiteknight | these unicode changes from nwellnhof++ are all very nice | 21:19 | |
| I'm excited to get so many improvements to our strings and IO systems added in such short order | 21:20 | ||
| dalek | nxed: r739 | NotFound++ | trunk/winxed (2 files): allow handle_types_except as modifier in try statement, use it and set exit |
||
|
21:23
bacek joined
21:24
particle1 is now known as particel,
particel is now known as particle
|
|||
| dalek | nxed: r740 | NotFound++ | trunk/pir/winxed_ (2 files): update installable files |
21:26 | |
|
21:28
whiteknight left
21:40
ambs left
21:42
bluescreen left
21:49
rurban_ joined,
cogno joined
21:51
rurban left
21:52
rurban_ is now known as rurban
21:53
cogno_ left
22:01
Andy left
22:09
plobsing_ joined
22:32
plobsing_ left
22:34
Eclesia left
22:40
nopaste left,
nopaste joined
|
|||
| bacek_at_work | ~~ | 22:46 | |
| dalek | p-rx/nom: feb7c9c | jonathan++ | / (2 files): Add storage_spec structure and various constants for a repr to describe how it likes to be stored inside another one. |
22:47 | |
| p-rx/nom: 059f70e | jonathan++ | src/metamodel/rakudoobject.h: Add get_storage_spec to REPR API. |
|||
| p-rx/nom: 1eb962d | jonathan++ | src/metamodel/ (6 files): Get all representations to provide a storage spec. |
|||
|
23:37
whiteknight joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | good evening, #parrot | 23:38 | |
| dukeleto | particle: have you given 3.0.0 a whirl yet? | 23:40 | |
|
23:46
arnsholt left
|
|||
| dalek | rrot/exceptions_subclass: c5c5992 | Whiteknight++ | / (7 files): use VTABLE_does to determine whether something is a valid exception, not pmc->vtable->base_type |
23:51 | |
| rrot/exceptions_subclass: 10fbc43 | Whiteknight++ | t/pmc/exception.t: test for throwing a subclass |
|||
| rrot/exceptions_subclass: 508d4de | Whiteknight++ | t/pmc/exception.t: add a test that we can use finalize_p on a subclass of Exception |
|||
| rrot/exceptions_subclass: 559c616 | Whiteknight++ | src/ (3 files): remove most uses of enum_class_Exception from the source. Where tested, use VTABLE_does instead. When building an exception, allow for HLL mapped subclasses |
|||
|
23:52
hercynium left
23:55
arnsholt joined
|
|||