|
Parrot 3.9.0 "Archaeopteryx" | parrot.org | Log: irclog.perlgeek.de/parrot | #parrotsketch meeting Tuesday 19:30 UTC Set by moderator on 19 October 2011. |
|||
| cotto | dukeleto: ping | 00:17 | |
|
00:18
whiteknight joined
|
|||
| cotto | 'evening, whiteknight | 00:19 | |
| whiteknight | 'ello, cotto | ||
| cotto | whiteknight: I appreciated the house blogging. It's nice to know what's been keeping you occupied. | 00:21 | |
| whiteknight | We've got another house lined up now, and I'm pretty hopeful about this one | 00:25 | |
| We've been actively house-hunting for over three years now, with the most bizarre streak of bad luck that anybody has ever heard of | |||
| benabik | It'll just make you appreciate your house that much more when you do get it. :-D | 00:26 | |
| benabik looks for the silver lining. | |||
| I should really get the RAM I've been looking at. Compiling Rakudo forces most of my normal programs into swap and it takes a long time to become responsive again. | 00:28 | ||
| whiteknight | Do we have anybody who regularly uses Windows now? | 00:30 | |
| I can do some light testing on Windows intermittently, but that's hardly enough to port a whole threading implementation | |||
| cotto | uses, yes. can do in-depth hacking, no. | 00:31 | |
| whiteknight | well, that's what we need most, somebody who is regularly using and hacking on windows | 00:32 | |
| I sent out notice about green_threads almost two weeks before the merge, and in that time not a single person tested it on windows. nine does't have access to windows and my access is extremely uncommon | 00:33 | ||
| so that's worrisome | |||
| cotto | I'll try a build now, but yes, it's quite worrisome. | 00:35 | |
| kid51 | The only person I've heard of who qualifies as "regularly using and hacking on windows" is jnthn | ||
| cotto | same here | ||
| whiteknight | and jnthn is clearly not interested in doing any parrot core development | ||
| It's not just a matter of having regular testers, because ttbot can do that (when it's working) | |||
| kid51 | Going into the July release, IIRC, coke had access to a Windows box on which we got to PASS on make test | 00:36 | |
| whiteknight | we are going to need to do some serious development to get threads working there in the not-so-distant future | ||
| kid51 | That was as good as we managed. | ||
| whiteknight | and green threads don't work there now | ||
| cotto | We can manage *if* the code we need to write is similar to the small snippets in src/platform, but we will have difficulty doing more than that given our current set of hackers. | 00:37 | |
| whiteknight | I have windows on my work computer. I can do testing in the background and very very small fixes, but I can't afford to clock out and do major development there | 00:39 | |
| cotto | same thing here | 00:45 | |
| small and medium fixes are fine, but I am technically being paid to work on $dayjob things | 00:46 | ||
| whiteknight | What I'm going to have to do is write a bunch of windows code here without being able to test it, commit to branch, and then try to test it at work | 00:55 | |
| and that's not exactly a setup for quick turnaround | |||
| cotto | no | ||
|
00:56
RobertLJ joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | I think we're going to have to move src/alarm.c to src/platform/generic/alarm or similar, and then add a win32 variant of the fle | 01:00 | |
| file | 01:01 | ||
| kid51 | Heh! Reading cpantesters report on one of my recent CPAN uploads, I have a failure the correction of which will require ... that I work on a Windows box! | 01:02 | |
| whiteknight | well, I'm going to have to completely rewrite the alarm code | 01:27 | |
| the API is not amenable to portability | |||
| benabik | Sadface | ||
| whiteknight | it's not a lot of code | 01:29 | |
| cotto | limited damage is good | 01:36 | |
| dalek | rrot/green_threads_win: 4fce7f8 | Whiteknight++ | / (7 files): Throw some crap together to start porting alarm to Win32. not finished, but I'm out of time tonight. |
||
| rrot/green_threads_win: 4fce7f8 | Whiteknight++ | / (7 files): Throw some crap together to start porting alarm to Win32. not finished, but I'm out of time tonight. |
|||
| whiteknight | I'll keep playing tomorrow | ||
| and I'm out for the night | |||
| benabik | whiteknight++ # descriptive commit messages | 01:38 | |
|
01:46
woosley joined
|
|||
| plobsing_ | someone throw those up on commits from last night | 01:47 | |
| benabik | ⦠That actually exists. www.commitlogsfromlastnight.com/ | 01:51 | |
| plobsing_ | yeah that one | 01:52 | |
|
02:38
RobertLJ1 joined
03:02
nbezzala joined
|
|||
| cotto | woot. commitlogsfromlsatnight links to commits now | 03:36 | |
| layout is broken on non-large screens | 03:37 | ||
| dukeleto | ~~ | 03:54 | |
| plobsing_ | cotto: it doesn't look broken on my screen. maybe I need to buy a bigger screen to see the intended layout :P | 04:00 | |
|
05:07
nbrown_ joined
05:08
schmooster joined
|
|||
| cotto | does anyone know what kid51's reposition_archive_tarball branch did? | 06:08 | |
| looks like it's not too big of a change | 06:09 | ||
|
07:25
SHODAN joined
08:02
nbrown joined
08:15
contingencyplan joined
|
|||
| nine | Good morning, #parrot | 08:37 | |
| moritz | good am, 9 | 08:38 | |
| nine | So what do I have to get a commit bit? It sucks to see people fixing things that I already fixed in my repo. | 08:39 | |
| moritz | nine: have you submitted a parrot CLA already? | ||
| nine: that's the first requirement. Then you need enough committers to be in favor of giving you a commit bit, which most likely won't be a problem | 08:40 | ||
| nine | moritz: no, where do I find this agreement? | ||
| moritz | nine: www.parrot.org/sites/www.parrot.org...ot_cla.pdf | 08:41 | |
| nine | moritz: thanks | 08:42 | |
| cotto | nine, yup. A current committer has to nominate you for a commit bit and one or two others need to second it. That and a cla will get you your bit. | ||
| moritz nominates nine for a commit bit. | |||
| cotto | traditionally we do it at #parrotsketch, though I don't know if that's required. | ||
| moritz | cotto: since the next one is in 6 days, would an email to parrot-dev work too? | 08:43 | |
| cotto | moritz, I'd call it good. | ||
| and I'll second | 08:44 | ||
| moritz sends the mail | |||
|
08:47
mj41 joined
|
|||
| nine | CLA sent to legal@parrot.org | 08:57 | |
|
08:59
particle joined
09:09
mj41 joined
09:55
particle joined
|
|||
| dalek | kudo/check-vars: 430c564 | moritz++ | src/Perl6/Actions.pm: align code vertically, no functional changes |
10:08 | |
| kudo/check-vars: c18c888 | moritz++ | src/Perl6/Actions.pm: complain about undeclared variables breaks the build |
|||
| kudo/check-vars: 0381c3c | moritz++ | src/core/ (2 files): move declarations of $Inf and $NaN before its first usage |
|||
| kudo/check-vars: 9464ea5 | moritz++ | src/core/Enum (2 files): work around variable interpolation issues in the setting; restores the build |
|||
| kudo/check-vars: 430c564 | moritz++ | src/Perl6/Actions.pm: align code vertically, no functional changes |
|||
| kudo/check-vars: c18c888 | moritz++ | src/Perl6/Actions.pm: complain about undeclared variables breaks the build |
|||
| kudo/check-vars: 0381c3c | moritz++ | src/core/ (2 files): move declarations of $Inf and $NaN before its first usage |
|||
| kudo/check-vars: 9464ea5 | moritz++ | src/core/Enum (2 files): work around variable interpolation issues in the setting; restores the build |
|||
|
10:35
alin joined
|
|||
| dalek | kudo/check-vars: c6bbbf8 | moritz++ | src/core/EnumMap.pm: fix typo in EnumMap.pm |
10:55 | |
| kudo/check-vars: 5a22e59 | moritz++ | src/Perl6/Actions.pm: work around over-eager complaints about things that might turn out to be variables in double-quoted strings |
|||
| kudo/check-vars: c6bbbf8 | moritz++ | src/core/EnumMap.pm: fix typo in EnumMap.pm |
|||
| kudo/check-vars: 5a22e59 | moritz++ | src/Perl6/Actions.pm: work around over-eager complaints about things that might turn out to be variables in double-quoted strings |
|||
|
11:13
particle joined
11:38
Psyche^ joined
11:46
particle1 joined
12:01
woosley left
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: 6fe1c97 | mls++ | / (4 files): fill_params: fill unused registers with default values if error checking if off The default is that error checking is off for call results. The calling.t test relied on this(!), so it now checks for that the result gets overwritten with PMCNULL. Also, two bugs in PGE::Exp and Test::More were detected and fixed because of this change. |
12:14 | |
| rrot: 6fe1c97 | mls++ | / (4 files): fill_params: fill unused registers with default values if error checking if off The default is that error checking is off for call results. The calling.t test relied on this(!), so it now checks for that the result gets overwritten with PMCNULL. Also, two bugs in PGE::Exp and Test::More were detected and fixed because of this change. |
|||
|
12:21
JimmyZ joined
12:24
whiteknight joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | good morning, #parrot | 12:31 | |
| nine | Good morning, whiteknight | 12:33 | |
| whiteknight | hello nine | ||
| nine: I started a new green_threads_win branch to refactor the alarms stuff and port it to windows. I'm going to have to rearrange that API pretty significantly to make it portable in a more generic way | 12:34 | ||
|
12:34
alin joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | if you have any particular insight or requests, let me know | 12:34 | |
| nine | whiteknight: why do you need to change the API? I'd guess that even on Windows a FLOATVAL when should be enough to set an alarm and somehow you can arrange for Parrot_alarm_callback to be called on expiry. I cannot imangine any timer API to be more limited than POSIX' :) | 12:40 | |
| whiteknight: Parrot_alarm_now is completely unused | |||
| whiteknight | nine: On windows we're going to need to keep a HANDLE reference to a timer queue object. That means we are either going to have to pass in the PARROT_INTERP to most of those functions, or some other system-specific data struct | 12:45 | |
| also, I need to add a Parrot_alarm_destroy to mirror Parrot_alarm_init, and cleanup resources at interp exit | |||
| Plus, if I can get rid of some of those global variables, that would be awesome | 12:46 | ||
| nine | and while we're at it: threads will make this even more interesting since all threads (and thus all their schedulers) have to share the same alarms | 12:48 | |
| whiteknight | the alarm counter can stay global, since all threads can read that value and compare to their current value. We'll deal with the full-threads case when we get to it | 12:50 | |
| I suspect we really are going to need to break the interp up into two parts, one part of which is a global shared store of data like this for configuring alarms | |||
| although, the posix version currently doesn't use a shared state, so we can just avoid initializing the alarms system a second time | 12:51 | ||
| nine | btw. I thought Windows was POSIX compatible? | 12:53 | |
| JimmyZ | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_POSIX_subsystem | 13:08 | |
|
13:09
pbaker joined
|
|||
| nine | in short: it's not | 13:10 | |
| whiteknight | nine: in short | 13:16 | |
| mls | hi guys! | 13:20 | |
| moritz | o/ | 13:21 | |
|
13:21
rfw joined
|
|||
| mls | what's with the support of event handlers in the exception handler array, does anybody use this? | 13:22 | |
| can I rip out the code? ;) | 13:30 | ||
| whiteknight | mls: is it causing a problem? | 13:38 | |
| mls | You mean beside being ugly, slow and useles? Probably not. | 13:39 | |
| whiteknight | mls: you can try ripping it out and seeing if it breaks any tests. I think we're going to replace a lot of eventing code with new green_threads stuff | ||
| mls | I'm implementing a pop_upto_eh opcode and it somewhat gets in the way | 13:40 | |
| I don't understand the code at all. And I neither see any documentation nor anybody using it | |||
| whiteknight | okay, try pulling it out and see what happens. Like I said, we're probably going to replace it with something better anyway | 13:41 | |
| mls | (I understand the code, but not the purpose ;) ) | ||
| the spec just talks about "adding event handlers to the scheduler" | |||
| moritz | .oO( there's a part of parrot that rakudo doesn't use? ) |
||
| mls | the code in question is about adding event handlers to the current context, like with push_eh | 13:42 | |
| whiteknight | moritz: there are several parts of Parrot rakudo doesn't use, and those parts haven't gotten much love | ||
| mls | (You can push an event handler with push_eh, but you can't pop it with pop_eh...) | ||
| whiteknight | well, that sounds stupid | ||
| mls | using push_eh to push an event handler is robably a misuse | 13:43 | |
| whiteknight | yes, I would think so | ||
| it also doesn't make sense to me that you would just have a generic event handler attached to the context | 13:44 | ||
| that doesn't seem like a useful mechanism, unless you're lazy and you just want events to be like exceptions but with a different name | |||
| mls | Currently they can only be removed by calling Parrot_cx_delete_handler_local with a handler_type | ||
| whiteknight | bleh | ||
| mls | yes, there's lots of code so that pop_eh really only pops exception handlers and not event handlers... | 13:45 | |
| I'd rather have another queue in the context than mixing them up | 13:46 | ||
| also, pop_eh does not pop the handler, but nulls the slot in the handler queue | 13:47 | ||
| so if you do lots of push_eh/pop_eh, the queue will get bigger and bigger | |||
| whiteknight | damnit | ||
| okay, that's all terrible | |||
| mls | ;) | ||
| whiteknight | kill it. Print the code out on paper, shoot it with a gun, and light it on fire | 13:48 | |
| mls | Ok, I'll create a branch. | ||
| moritz | this kinda reminds me of the old "how many lines of code did you write this month?" -- "-3000" | ||
| nine | moritz: sounds like a very good month. Removed code is debugged code. | 13:49 | |
| Coke | unbugged | ||
| mls | .oO(another way to bring down the number of bugs) |
13:50 | |
| you beat me | |||
| whiteknight | that's what we told the students last year for GCI: There are two ways to increase test coverage: Write more tests, or delete more code | ||
|
13:50
benabik joined
|
|||
| mls | Oh, another thing. It seems that lots of ops do a Parrot_str_new_constant() call. Isn't that expensive? | 13:52 | |
| whiteknight | mls: do you have an example? | ||
| mls | uh, e.g. pop_eh does Parrot_str_new_constant(interp, "exception") | 13:53 | |
| That CONST_STRING mechanism doesn't work for ops, I guess | |||
| whiteknight | Yeah, our handling of constant strings leaves much to be desired | 13:54 | |
| benabik | o/ #parrot | ||
| whiteknight | hello benabik | ||
| mls | it probably can't be used for dynops, but it would be nice to have for the core ops | ||
| whiteknight | If you can find any such case in particular that is slowing things down, we can probably optimize it | 13:55 | |
| mls | I think Parrot_str_new_constant() always does a hash lookup | ||
| benabik | Could store the string in a static variable⦠Not sure if that's the best idea, but it could work | 13:56 | |
| (If we can be ensured that constant strings don't move.) | |||
| JimmyZ | bacek++ created a branch to delelte Parrot_str_new_constant | ||
| mls | I think jnthn++ does that for some rakudo key strings that get used very often | ||
| whiteknight | benabik: I'm thinking we set up a handful of global constants, and use the PObj_is_external_FLAG, or whatever it's called, to prevent GC from playing with it | ||
| if you find a particular bad case in the profiles, we can test it out | 13:57 | ||
| Coke | hey, didn't bacek commit something recently? did he vanish again? | ||
| benabik | whiteknight: That works too. I'm not hugely familiar with the internals. | ||
| mls | Meybe we can use something like CONST_STRING and resolve all constant strings at dynop load time | 13:58 | |
| benabik | Not sure how'd we do that, really... | 14:02 | |
| Best I can think of is if we have a function that's called when the library is loaded it could do all the setup for strings it'll need. | |||
| dalek | kudo/nom: 430c564 | moritz++ | src/Perl6/Actions.pm: align code vertically, no functional changes |
14:03 | |
| kudo/nom: d307831 | moritz++ | src/ (4 files): Catch variable use before declaration (RT #61838) Does not catch unused non-$ variables in double quoted strings. This also moves $Inf and $NaN to an earlier setting file, because they were used before the declaration. It also contains a very ugly workaound around a problem with the nqp %markhash being global, and reused for multiple evals. This bug was exposed by other parts of the patch. |
|||
| kudo/nom: 430c564 | moritz++ | src/Perl6/Actions.pm: align code vertically, no functional changes |
|||
| kudo/nom: d307831 | moritz++ | src/ (4 files): Catch variable use before declaration (RT #61838) Does not catch unused non-$ variables in double quoted strings. This also moves $Inf and $NaN to an earlier setting file, because they were used before the declaration. It also contains a very ugly workaound around a problem with the nqp %markhash being global, and reused for multiple evals. This bug was exposed by other parts of the patch. |
|||
| moritz | so, we have 4 +1 votes on nine++ getting a commit bit | 14:10 | |
| benabik | I'm big on giving a commit bit to anyone who's already created a large branch that we've merged in. :-D | 14:21 | |
|
14:25
JimmyZ joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | if he has sent in a CLA, we'll definitely do it | 15:09 | |
| dalek | rrot: c489e0b | mls++ | src/call/args.c: fix cuddled else |
15:10 | |
| nine | whiteknight: sent by email this morning | ||
| rrot: c489e0b | mls++ | src/call/args.c: fix cuddled else |
|||
| rrot/mls/kill-events-in-ehqueue: 513be6d | mls++ | / (7 files): Delete handler_type argument from exception handler functions. Mixing event and exception handlers seems to be a bad idea, it makes the code very complicated. Also, pop_eh did just zero out the queue element instead of removing it. Also, some code was added to make exception rethrow more robust in case handlers were added/removed. |
15:18 | ||
| rrot/mls/kill-events-in-ehqueue: 513be6d | mls++ | / (7 files): Delete handler_type argument from exception handler functions. Mixing event and exception handlers seems to be a bad idea, it makes the code very complicated. Also, pop_eh did just zero out the queue element instead of removing it. Also, some code was added to make exception rethrow more robust in case handlers were added/removed. |
|||
| mls | All tests seem to pass. Please review ;) | ||
|
15:19
bluescreen joined
15:25
alester joined
|
|||
| NotFound | <moritz> this kinda reminds me of the old "how many lines of code did you write this month?" -- "-3000" -> That may have been my first contributions to parrot. | 15:33 | |
| moritz | mls: testing rakudo on top of it | 15:35 | |
| NotFound | I think event handlers are used in nci callbacks. | 15:37 | |
| mls | moritz: thanks! | 15:38 | |
| NotFound: just for clarification: the branch is about EventHandlers set in CallContexts, not in the Scheduler. The Scheduler ones are unchanged. | 15:39 | ||
| I don't know what NCI uses | 15:40 | ||
| NotFound | I think that no one uses those, yes. | ||
| dukeleto | ~~ | ||
| moritz | ... and t/pmc/nci.t passes on that branch | 15:41 | |
|
15:45
ambs joined
|
|||
| whiteknight | nine: I just put your CLA through moderation. It should be showing up on the list soon | 15:50 | |
| ...and there it is | 15:51 | ||
| moritz | testf__t/pmc/alarm.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 7 Failed: 2) Failed tests: 3-4 | 15:55 | |
| on the mls/kill-events-in-ehqueue branch | |||
| whiteknight | that test fails intermittently for me on master and is probably faulty | ||
| moritz | ok | ||
| whiteknight | I need to look at it more closely | ||
| nine | whiteknight: the test is definitely faulty. It tests for alarms to arrive in a certain order which is guaranteed nowhere | 15:57 | |
| whiteknight | okay, so let's delete the test | ||
| nine | whiteknight: b1dbbadccd1788f9528b3854c69976027a97358a in master in my repo removes the faulty tests, but leaves those that should work. | 16:00 | |
| whiteknight | nine: I think I just gave you a commit bit to parrot. Can you give it a test? | 16:03 | |
| dukeleto | congrats to the new bit for nine++ | 16:06 | |
| dalek | rrot: b1dbbad | nine++ | t/pmc/alarm.t: Remove faulty tests from t/pmc/alarm.t The removed tests tested for alarms firing in a certain order which cannot be guaranteed due to preemption introducing a random element into the mix. |
16:07 | |
| rrot: e20b3be | nine++ | / (4 files): Merge branch 'master' of github.com:parrot/parrot |
|||
| dukeleto | nine: if you haven't already, add yourself to CREDITS | ||
| nine | Seems to work :) | 16:08 | |
| whiteknight | awesome. Definitely make sure you are in CREDITS | 16:09 | |
| dukeleto | i just saw nine++'s CLA go through | 16:12 | |
| nine | btw. who's the hero who changed fulltest to run in a single harness? That awesome change saves quite some time | 16:27 | |
| whiteknight | no idea. Wasn't me | 16:30 | |
| PerlJam | nine: git blame works :) | 16:45 | |
|
16:51
lateau joined
17:02
pbaker joined
|
|||
| dalek | kudo/nom: fde126b | jnthn++ | src/Perl6/Optimizer.pm: Make sure the optimizer knows about PAST::Want nodes; stub for PAST::Var consideration. |
17:08 | |
| Coke | nine,whiteknight: it was kid51++ who also pinged parrot-dev about it. | 17:13 | |
| ingy | dukeleto: are you going to the lucky lab tomorrow? | 17:14 | |
| Coke | ho, ingy. | 17:17 | |
| ingy | Coke: hi. are you in pdx? | 17:30 | |
| dukeleto | ingy: privmsg | 17:31 | |
| Coke | nah. though my wife just flew out of SEA this morning. | ||
| ingy | dukeleto: still waking up | ||
| cotto | ~~ | 17:47 | |
|
17:54
fperrad joined
18:08
bluescreen joined
|
|||
| cotto | dukeleto++ | 18:28 | |
| dukeleto | cotto: what did i do? | 18:37 | |
| cotto | dukeleto: the new shiny osuosl machine you posted about to parrot-dev. You didn't actually do anything, but I don't consider that a barrier to karma. | 18:40 | |
| dukeleto | cotto: wfm | ||
| dalek | kudo/nom: 58c4721 | jnthn++ | src/Perl6/Actions.pm: Include and propagate a bit more type information. |
18:43 | |
| kudo/nom: 325ea3c | jnthn++ | src/Perl6/Actions.pm: Various improvements to handling of native types; get back to producing stuff the inliner can do well with. |
|||
| kudo/nom: 5b98ef4 | jnthn++ | src/core/Int.pm: Start to simplify various of the native ops thanks to native handling improvements; don't need the nqp::want rigmarole any more. |
|||
|
19:02
schmooster joined
19:32
contingencyplan joined
|
|||
| dalek | kudo/native-ints: 41359ec | moritz++ | src/core/Int.pm: get rid of nqp::want in Int.pm |
19:46 | |
|
19:57
mj41 joined
|
|||
| NotFound | dukeleto: ping | 19:58 | |
| dukeleto | NotFound: pong | 20:00 | |
| NotFound | dukeleto: What's the task in cardinal #19? Merge the pull request and fix it? | 20:01 | |
| dukeleto | NotFound: make "winxed setup.winxed test/smoke" work, then merge | 20:04 | |
| NotFound: someone submitted a setup.winxed, but the test and smoke stages don't work | |||
| NotFound | I'm not so confident with git and github to do that in a clean way. Is ok to just get the setup.winxed file? | 20:05 | |
| dukeleto | NotFound: github.com/lateau/cardinal/commit/...eb040.diff | 20:06 | |
| NotFound: you can add .diff or .patch to most github URLs | |||
|
20:06
ambs joined
|
|||
| dukeleto | NotFound: then run "git apply foo.diff" on the diff file you download, to apply it to your local repo | 20:07 | |
| NotFound: or you can download the setup.winxed file. Whatev | |||
| NotFound | That's the same, the diff file does not provide autorship et al. | ||
| benabik | .patch should | 20:08 | |
| dukeleto | what benabik++ said | ||
| NotFound | $ parrot setup.pir test -> does not pass, gives TAP format errors. Is this expected? | 20:09 | |
| (in cardinal) | 20:10 | ||
|
20:13
jsut_ joined
|
|||
| dukeleto | NotFound: not sure. patches welcome :) | 20:14 | |
| NotFound | The failing test file is: t/01-stmts.t | ||
| Patches for cardinal? I know nothing about ruby. | |||
| dukeleto | NotFound: the issue was getting setup.winxed to actually run tests | 20:16 | |
| NotFound: it was not able to find the tests. Can you fix that issue? | |||
| NotFound | Flat with a string? WTF? | 20:20 | |
| dalek | rdinal/winxed_setup: 3f3b4a7 | NotFound++ | setup.winxed: setup.winxed from pull request 19 with my fixes |
20:57 | |
| NotFound | dukeleto: here is | ||
| dalek | p: d75deea | moritz++ | src/PAST/NQP.pir: more math nqp:: ops |
21:14 | |
| p: 3400e44 | moritz++ | src/PAST/NQP.pir: more nqp:: math ops |
|||
| kudo/nom: aecd2fc | jnthn++ | src/Perl6/Optimizer.pm: Remove fossil analysis from optimizer. |
21:18 | ||
|
21:29
benabik_ joined
|
|||
| dalek | p: 7e4bb20 | moritz++ | src/PAST/NQP.pir: forgot nqp::sinh_n |
21:31 | |
| kudo/nom: b441203 | tadzik++ | / (2 files): Implement splice(); run S32-array/splice.t |
21:32 | ||
|
22:20
whiteknight joined
22:27
arnsholt joined
|
|||
| NotFound | Historical event: now winxedxx support closures. | 22:35 | |
|
22:39
hernan joined
22:40
hernan joined
22:41
hernan joined
22:42
hernan joined
22:43
hernan joined
22:44
hernan joined
|
|||
| Coke | NotFound++ | 23:14 | |
|
23:33
zpmorgan joined
23:59
rfw joined
|
|||