|
Parrot 0.6.3 "Beautiful Parrot" Released | parrotcode.org/ | 5/649/88 new/open/stalled tix | logged in irclog.perlgeek.de/parrot/today Set by moderator on 17 June 2008. |
|||
|
00:09
AndyA joined
00:17
Ademan joined
|
|||
| bacek_ | hi again... | 00:26 | |
| dalek | r28655 | Whiteknight++ | gsoc_pdd09: | 00:32 | |
| : [gsoc_pdd09] Made necessary changes so that Parrot and libparrot will compile. Parrot does not run, miniparrot will not compile, and build process doesn't go past that. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=28655 | |||
| r28656 | jkeenan++ | trunk: | 00:33 | ||
| : Merging nom4 branch into trunk. This removes config/auto/m4.pm and associated test file. Cf.: rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43857. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=28656 | |||
| r28657 | coke++ | trunk: | |||
| : RT#56076 ([PATCH] MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET not defined during OSX PPC Rakudo build) | |||
| : This adds (proactively, in some cases) the MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET env. var | |||
| : to the various languge builds; we've found this to be required on OSX with | |||
| : the current code base. | |||
| : Patch courtesy Packy Anderson (packy++ at dardan dot com) | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=28657 | |||
|
00:35
TiMBuS joined
|
|||
| dalek | r28658 | jkeenan++ | trunk: | 00:36 | |
| : Correct POD formatting errors. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=28658 | |||
| r28659 | jkeenan++ | nom4: | 00:39 | ||
| : Branch has been merged into trunk and is no longer needed at HEAD. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=28659 | |||
| r28660 | jkeenan++ | nom4-28604: | 00:40 | ||
| : Branch to which this tag corresponds has been merged into trunk; tag is no longer needed. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=28660 | |||
|
01:09
teknomunk joined
01:25
Zaba joined
|
|||
| kid51 | Has anyone recently attempted to 'make perl6' on Mac OS X 10.4 on PPC? This command: /Users/jimk/work/parrot/pbc_to_exe perl6.pbc -- seems to hang indefinitely (meaning: I had to Control-C it after 20 minutes of no change). | 01:30 | |
| apeiron | FWIW, it doesn't show up on Leopard Intel. | 01:36 | |
|
01:46
tetragon left,
tetragon joined
01:52
Theory joined
02:06
GeJ joined
02:28
cjfields joined
02:42
DietCoke joined
|
|||
| DietCoke | New version of perlcritic.t sent in a patch for folks to play with. | 02:42 | |
| tcl: after 10000 {puts hello} | 02:43 | ||
|
02:43
Eevee joined
|
|||
| polyglotbot | RESULT[invalid command name "("ā¤] | 02:43 | |
|
02:47
tetragon joined
|
|||
| dalek | r28661 | Whiteknight++ | gsoc_pdd09: | 02:54 | |
| : [gsoc_pdd09] you know those mistakes you make, and when the compiler points them out you think to yourself "damnit! how could I make such a stupid mistake"? Here's fixes for about a hundred of those that I've made. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=28661 | |||
| TiMBuS | hahaha | 02:57 | |
|
03:00
Theory joined
03:02
tetragon joined
03:12
jjore joined
03:15
tetragon joined
03:25
cjfields joined
|
|||
| bacek_ | Whiteknight++ | 03:29 | |
|
04:04
tetragon joined
|
|||
| japhb | tetragon: connection flapping? | 04:04 | |
| tetragon | japhb: Yep | ||
| Is the current teapot conveyor supposed to have a rotating ring of particles on it? | 04:08 | ||
| japhb | yes | 04:09 | |
| tetragon | When I first saw it, it looked like a rendering issue until it coalesced | ||
| japhb | heh | ||
| It looks better if you uncomment the line for GL_POINT_SMOOTH, but it turns out that's broken on a lot of systems. | |||
| Some systems it just runs slowly, others the particles disappear altogether. | 04:10 | ||
| I'm going to have to switch to textured quads instead of point particles, which I was planning to anyway, just not quite yet. | |||
| tetragon | I'll probably be sans-ppc for part of this week. Getting this thing's LCD panel replaced | ||
| japhb | ah | ||
| Do you still have a Mac OS X box? | 04:11 | ||
| tetragon | Just the 32-bit Intel | ||
| japhb | Well, at least you still have your preferred OS ... | ||
| tetragon | But I'm still on the iBook for now | ||
| japhb | Any cygwin people about? | 04:12 | |
| tetragon | My backup laptops are all Linux | 04:13 | |
| Whiteknight | I used to be sort of a cygwin person | ||
| tetragon | And GL_POINT_SMOOTH works for me | ||
| Whiteknight | which doesnt help, i'm sure | ||
| japhb | Whiteknight: :-) Given that I'm looking for feedback on a cygwin patch, no. :-) | 04:14 | |
| tetragon: what's your video card? | |||
| tetragon | (with the exception of work stuff, my normal usage patterns are sufficiently OS-agnostic that any sufficiently Unixy system could work) | ||
| japhb: ATI Mobility Radeon 9550 | 04:18 | ||
| (32MB VRAM) | |||
| japhb | Go ATI. Finally with the unsucky video drivers. Though Apple probably helped ... | ||
| tetragon | hehe | 04:22 | |
|
05:07
Psyche^ joined
05:11
Zaba_ joined
|
|||
| dalek | r28662 | Whiteknight++ | gsoc_pdd09: | 05:14 | |
| : [gsoc_pdd09] fixed all compiler errors. Still doesn't build. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=28662 | |||
|
05:48
omega joined
|
|||
| dalek | r28663 | petdance++ | trunk: | 06:05 | |
| : Minor tweaky for speedup | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=28663 | |||
| r28664 | petdance++ | trunk: | 06:13 | ||
| : fixed an unqouted period | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=28664 | |||
| r28665 | petdance++ | trunk: | |||
| : removed unnecessary and expensive -B check, since we only push certain extensions into our list | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=28665 | |||
| r28666 | petdance++ | trunk: | 06:21 | ||
| : hide a colon in "vim:" so the real vim doesnt get confused | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=28666 | |||
|
06:24
apeiron joined
|
|||
| dalek | r28667 | petdance++ | trunk: | 06:27 | |
| : Don't recompile the -based regexes each line. Also save off before doing the next m// | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=28667 | |||
|
06:54
nothingmuch joined
|
|||
| nothingmuch | does jgoff hang out here? | 06:54 | |
|
06:55
iblechbot joined
07:01
Zaba joined
07:20
cosimo joined
07:39
askie joined
07:49
nothingmuch left
07:57
clunker3 joined
|
|||
| Zaba | moin | 08:06 | |
| perl6: pi / 2; | 08:11 | ||
| polyglotbot | RESULT[3.14159] | ||
|
08:24
Zaba_ joined
08:32
masak joined
|
|||
| bacek | Zaba_, bot just little bit outdated. | 09:27 | |
| Zaba_ | oh okay | ||
| :> | |||
| moritz | p6eval on #perl6 does it right | 09:28 | |
| masak | in the thread on perl6-users, the error message is "Scope not found for PAST::Var '$temp'" | 09:29 | |
| two questions: | |||
| 1. why two spaces between 'Scope' and 'not'? | |||
| 2. don't we want to emulate Perl 5 error messages when sensible? | |||
| moritz | 1. dunno - could be fixed, presumably | 09:30 | |
| 2. I think the system for error messages will be changed anyway | |||
| for example to allow easier i18n | |||
| masak | I'd like something in the way of 'Global symbol "$temp" requires explicit package name at - line 4.' | 09:31 | |
| TiMBuS | .return self.'panic'("Scope ", scope, " not found for PAST::Var '", name, "'") | 09:32 | |
| from compilers/pct/src/PAST/Compiler.pir | |||
| masak | what's the point in returning the name of a scope that wasn't found? | 09:36 | |
| TiMBuS: thanks, btw | |||
| TiMBuS | no problem, anything to put off implementing these lazy lists in my language | 09:37 | |
| moritz | ;) | ||
| TiMBuS | i procrastinate by doing something productive | ||
| lol | |||
| masak | that doesn't sound too bad, actually | 09:38 | |
| TiMBuS | someone wanna make a patch or just tell pmichaud about it | 09:39 | |
| moritz | I'll write a patch and send to parrotbug | 09:40 | |
| TiMBuS | i still have to make that patch for 'reverse' but i still havent gotten around to reversing unicode strings | 09:42 | |
| moritz | TiMBuS: I wrote something about that on perlmonks, just a second... | ||
| TiMBuS | because its actually kinda difficult i have to make a new buffer and i have no idea what parrot's stance on 'malloc' is | ||
| moritz | TiMBuS: for the Unicode related part you might want to read www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=657862 | 09:43 | |
| TiMBuS | will do | ||
| moritz | patch sent | 09:45 | |
| TiMBuS | ive also noticed that a few string operations assume that a 'Parrot_fixed_8_encoding_ptr' encoded string is fixed-length but its actually utf-8 | 09:49 | |
| moritz | patch is in #56252 btw | ||
| TiMBuS: iirc there are some big changes to the string handling on the way | |||
| TiMBuS | oh | 09:50 | |
| masak wonders if the big refactoring on $_, $/ et al is also on the way | |||
| moritz | masak: pmichaud worked on that yesterday, so I guess it's on the way ;) | ||
| masak | \\o/ | ||
| bacek | moritz, can you check: S29-str/uc.t and lc.t works for me. | 10:00 | |
| o. | 10:01 | ||
| karma moritz | |||
| karma bacek | |||
| lazy bot... | |||
| Zaba_ | he's down | 10:02 | |
| moritz | bacek: what do you mean by "works for me"? | 10:03 | |
| bacek: the unicode fudging needs to be there for parrot build wihtout ICU | |||
| bacek: apart from that, they do pass | 10:07 | ||
| looking at S29-num/exp.t it seems that the fudge message needs to be updated | 10:08 | ||
| bacek | unicode already fudged in lc/uc. | ||
| Looks like they can be added to spectest_regression. | 10:09 | ||
| Don't change exp.t. Just wait till pmchaud apply some patches and unfudge it :) | 10:10 | ||
| moritz | bacek: ah wait, no - I check {lc,uc}first instead | ||
| bacek | Actually I just can commit my version. | ||
| (u|l)cfirst already in regression. | |||
| moritz | lc fails with get_string() not implemented in class 'Range' for me | ||
| and uc says # Looks like you planned 11 tests, but ran 17 | 10:11 | ||
| bacek | hm... | ||
| What about -G? | 10:12 | ||
| moritz | same thing | ||
| bacek | yak... Got 17 too.. | 10:13 | |
| moritz | actually one of the tests is outdated | ||
| bacek | 'fudge' bug | ||
| moritz | is(uc("Ć"), "SS", "uc() of non-ascii chars may result in two chars"); | ||
| the newest unicode release has a single character for upper case Ć (which nobody uses :/) | |||
| bacek | yak... | 10:15 | |
| moritz | I'm working on uc.t right now | ||
| bacek | 'design by committee' suck all the time... | 10:16 | |
| moritz | bacek: I commited the corrected version | 10:17 | |
| bacek | moritz, some of comments definitely wrong... It should be 'parsefail' for = .uc | ||
| moritz | bacek: and the last line produces 3 SKIP outputs | 10:19 | |
| fixed. Now uc.t can be added to spectest_regression | 10:21 | ||
| bacek | 'fudge' bug... | ||
| moritz | many of those, actuallly | ||
| bacek rebuilding parrot... It will take about 15 minutes | |||
| moritz, yes... It's not ready to include in spectest_regression... | 10:22 | ||
| moritz | it's now, see #perl6 ;) | 10:23 | |
| bacek | :) | 10:25 | |
| afk for a while | |||
| moritz | we really need regression tests for fudge :/ | 10:26 | |
|
11:12
cognominal left
11:22
cognominal joined
11:44
purl joined
11:55
bacek joined
12:36
tetragon joined
12:38
Whiteknight joined,
cognominal joined
|
|||
| dalek | r28668 | Whiteknight++ | gsoc_pdd09: | 12:42 | |
| : [gsoc_pdd09] update to trunk r28667 | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=28668 | |||
|
12:50
DietCoke joined
|
|||
| DietCoke | how often does polyglotbot update its source? | 12:51 | |
|
13:01
gryphon joined
13:26
iblechbot joined,
Zaba joined
13:35
paco joined
13:37
Coleoid_ joined
|
|||
| cognominal dreams of a strict mode in grammar that forbids naked strings as litterals. Half of the time I do that, I really want to call a rule | 14:00 | ||
|
14:03
jhorwitz joined
14:05
slightlyoff joined
14:06
slightlyoff left
14:12
cjfields joined
14:14
davidfetter joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | okay, either I'm confused or there's something really wrong here | 14:17 | |
| can someone tell me where I'm overlooking something...? (process follows) | 14:18 | ||
| I'm running r28667 | |||
| fresh build (make realclean) of parrot and perl6 | |||
| I have a (p6) program called 'x': | 14:19 | ||
|
14:19
Andy joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | $ cat x | 14:19 | |
| say '1..0'; | |||
| $ | |||
| if I run 'x' using perl6.pbc, everything works | |||
| $ ./parrot perl6.pbc x | |||
| 1..0 | |||
| $ | |||
| $ ./parrot perl6.pbc x | |||
| 1..0 | |||
| $ | |||
| (oops, sorry for double-paste) | 14:20 | ||
| Andy | I hope everyone appreciates the tenths of seconds I removed from the rakudo make test runs! | ||
| ENTIRE TENTHS OF SECONDS, I TELL YOU | |||
| pmichaud | if I run 'x' using perl6.pir, I get an error | ||
| $ ./parrot perl6.pir x | |||
| Null PMC access in isa() | |||
| current instr.: '!EXPORT' pc 9291 (src/gen_builtins.pir:6134) | |||
| called from Sub 'parrot;Perl6Str;onload' pc 901 (src/gen_builtins.pir:589) | |||
| $ | |||
| now the question is.... WHY? | |||
| (note that perl6.pbc is built by doing parrot -o perl6.pbc perl6.pir ) | 14:21 | ||
| cjfields | Andy++ | 14:22 | |
| cjfields appreciates Andy | |||
| pmichaud | or, the underlying question: shouldn't parrot perl6.pir and parrot perl6.pbc do essentially the same thing in this case? | 14:23 | |
| Andy | cjfields: TENTHS OF A SECOND! | 14:24 | |
| cjfields is deaf now | |||
| heh | |||
| NotFound | pmichaud: maybe a path problem? | 14:26 | |
| pmichaud | NotFound: like, what kind of path? | ||
|
14:26
cosimo joined
|
|||
| NotFound | pmichaud: the path for a pbc being loaded. | 14:26 | |
| pmichaud | I think there's only one perl6.pbc in this case | 14:27 | |
| actually, it would be useful to know if anyone can reproduce. | |||
| I guess I'll send a message to the list. | 14:28 | ||
| cjfields | I can reproduce: | ||
| NotFound | $ ../../parrot perl6.pir x | 14:29 | |
| Null PMC access in isa() | |||
| current instr.: '!EXPORT' pc 9291 (src/gen_builtins.pir:6134) | |||
| called from Sub 'parrot;Perl6Str;onload' pc 901 (src/gen_builtins.pir:589) | |||
| pmichaud | perfect. | ||
| purl | if it seems perfect, your understanding is less than perfect. | ||
| nopaste | "cjfields" at 128.174.124.54 pasted "parrot perl6.pir x" (5 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/13371 | ||
| pmichaud | my understanding of purl is "perfect". :-) | ||
| jhorwitz | pmichaud: i CANNOT produce on r28322, if that helps you isolate it. | 14:30 | |
| jonathan | pmichaud: I'm too tied up with other things and groggy from illness to think well, but - yes, I'd expect the .pir and .pbc to do the same; might I suggest looking at initialization ordering of :init :load subs as one possible thing to explore. | ||
| avar | should perl6.pir x return '1..0' ? | ||
| pmichaud | avar: it should display "1..0\\n" on stdout | ||
| cjfields | I'm on r28668, Mac OS X (Leopard, Intel) | ||
| avar | is x an internal function you wrote? | 14:31 | |
| pmichaud | it's just a perl6 program that does "say '1..0';" | ||
| avar | ah, I thought it was the x op:) | ||
| pmichaud | jonathan: the null PMC comes from doing a lookup of the 'sprintf' sub. | ||
| avar | pmichaud: can perl6.pbc run any programs? | 14:32 | |
| cjfields | pmichaud: I'm getting the same thing with an empty file (created using 'touch') | 14:33 | |
| maybe I/O? | |||
| pmichaud | cjfields: ah yes -- since perl6.pir is failing during initialization, it doesn't really matter what program we send as input. | 14:34 | |
| nopaste | "pmichaud" at 76.183.97.54 pasted "trace output just before null pmc" (17 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/13372 | ||
| pmichaud | I think that :load / :init shouldn't matter here, since the entire perl6.pir file is compiled before any subs get run. | 14:35 | |
| oddly, if I do tracing with -t4, I get a different error. | 14:37 | ||
| and tracing with -t4 produces an error even for perl6.pbc | |||
| jonathan | pmichaud: I can't imagine it being GC related, but you have checked with -G? | 14:38 | |
| pmichaud | yes, and I got the same results. | ||
| jonathan | OK, good it's not that. | ||
| pmichaud | $ ./parrot -G perl6.pir | 14:39 | |
| Null PMC access in isa() | |||
| current instr.: '!EXPORT' pc 9291 (src/gen_builtins.pir:6134) | |||
| called from Sub 'parrot;Perl6Str;onload' pc 901 (src/gen_builtins.pir:589) | |||
| $ | |||
| pmichaud tries r28322, since that one worked for jhorwitz | 14:40 | ||
|
14:43
avar joined
|
|||
| DietCoke | pmichaud: might be related to an :onload vs. :init or some other :thing. | 14:44 | |
| pmichaud | DietCoke: I don't see how it could be, though. | ||
| running a .pir or its corresponding .pbc "should" do the same thing, unless there are :immediate subs | 14:45 | ||
| DietCoke | binary search? :| | ||
| ah, :immediate. | |||
| pmichaud | I can confirm that r28322 works for me. | ||
| $ ./parrot perl6.pir | 14:46 | ||
| > | |||
| jhorwitz++ | |||
| jhorwitz | yay. now comes the hard part. :) | ||
| pmichaud | I need to step away for a bit... will write this up when I get back. | ||
| pmichaud has had a very frustrating night chasing down lexical and bytecode issues. | 14:47 | ||
|
14:47
avar joined
14:49
avar joined
14:51
avar joined
|
|||
| cjfields | pmichaud: tested out 'parrot -t4 perl6.pir x', got 'Null PMC access in find_method()' instead, which | 15:11 | |
| I'm guessing is what you got as well | |||
| NotFound | Same here. | 15:12 | |
| diakopter | pmichaud: "has had a ... night..." wow; up all night? | ||
| NotFound | This is interesting: '../../parrot -t4 perl6.pbc x' also fils. | 15:13 | |
| fails | |||
| DietCoke | j "killer app" horwitz, how's it going? | 15:22 | |
| confound | DietCoke: that's a really unwieldy nickname | ||
| rjbs | "kap" for short | 15:24 | |
| cjfields | NotFound: '-t4' bug appears to be independent of the 'Null PMC access in isa()' | 15:28 | |
| I tried it with a separate perl6 test which works w/o '-t4' | |||
| and get the same error | 15:29 | ||
| NotFound | Agree. | ||
| jhorwitz | DietCoke: putting out fires at $DAYJOB right now.... :-P | 15:35 | |
| DietCoke | I will trade you for insanely boring merge task. | 15:37 | |
| hurm. nevermind. =-) | 15:40 | ||
| jhorwitz hands over site outage to DietCoke :) | 15:43 | ||
| DietCoke | no TOO LATE! | 15:52 | |
|
15:52
gryphon joined
|
|||
| NotFound | I'v made a quick hack: making isa and isa_pmc return 0 in null.pmc solves the problem. | 15:55 | |
| pmichaud | no, that just hides the problem. | 15:56 | |
| it shouldn't be null in the first place. | |||
| NotFound | That's my definition of "quicj hack" ;) | ||
|
15:56
sjansen joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | perl6.pir works as of r28536 | 15:58 | |
|
15:59
sjansen joined
|
|||
| cognominal | pmichaud: it seems to me that the "$<sym> = " are useless in the routine_declarator regex of rakudo. | 16:00 | |
| pmichaud | useless because...? | ||
| cognominal | because they are not used in actions.pm | 16:01 | |
| pmichaud | they're there for compatibility with STD.pm | ||
| cognominal | the #= does the job | ||
| ha, ok | 16:02 | ||
| pmichaud | perl6.pir works as of r28570 | 16:03 | |
| NotFound | My hack pass all tests, looks like the current behavior of isa with a null pmc is untested, and I've not found documentation for it. | ||
| pmichaud | the behavior of any op (except is_null, unless_null, if_null) on a null PMC is to throw an exception. | 16:04 | |
| so the current implementation is correct. | |||
| NotFound | What will be a good place to test it? t/oo/isa.t ? | 16:05 | |
| pmichaud | I don't know that we need to test every op to make sure it throws an exception on the null PMC. But if we're going to test isa, then yes, t/oo/isa.t would likely be the place to do it. | 16:06 | |
| better might be to nave a t/pmc/null.t that goes through all of the available ops and makes sure they throw exceptions. | |||
| (instead of spreading the tests throughout lots of t/op/* files. | 16:07 | ||
| NotFound | Ideally, a program that automatically writes that test will be good. | ||
| pmichaud | or just reads a list of tests from a file like src/ops/ops.num | 16:08 | |
| NotFound | Actually 'does' return 0, with this comment: /* XXX maybe a hack to get TGE running again */ | 16:09 | |
| pmichaud | that sounds like a TGE bug | ||
| the problem with such hacks is that it hides the underlying problem. | 16:10 | ||
| in rakudo's case, the fact that a lookup of 'sprintf' is returning null is a serious problem. | |||
| it's a serious _parrot_ problem, at that. | |||
| if we keep hiding the problems, eventually we can't find them to fix them. | |||
| DietCoke | pmichaud++ | 16:11 | |
| NotFound | pmichaud: Yes, I had problems of that type trying to find utf8 related problems. | ||
| pmichaud | I'd argue that the "does return 0" hack ought to be removed and we figure out what in TGE is having trouble. | ||
| perl6.pir works in r28608 | 16:14 | ||
| perl6.pir fails in r28633 | 16:21 | ||
|
16:26
gmansi joined
|
|||
| avar | pmichaud: you can use git-bisect to find where the problem occured | 16:36 | |
| pmichaud | except I'm not using git :-) | 16:41 | |
| and I'm doing a bit more selective choosing than a simple bisection. | 16:42 | ||
| perl6.pir fails in r28627 | 16:44 | ||
| DietCoke hopes he gets a new version of Iterator soon that allows him to release a new version of the binary search tool. | 16:47 | ||
| pmichaud | perl6.pir passes in r28626 | 16:48 | |
| hrm. | |||
| well, that doesn't tell me much. :-( | 16:49 | ||
| NotFound | 28627: [rakudo]: * Add a version of 'sprintf' (RT#56208, bacek++) * Patch courtesy Vasi.. | 16:50 | |
| pmichaud | right. That's the point at which sprintf was added, but it doesn't explain why perl6.pbc works and perl6.pir fails. | 16:51 | |
| they should either both succeed or both fail. | |||
| DietCoke | which one of those lines is failing in the .pir ? | ||
| NotFound | At least explains why the problem was not noticed before. | ||
| pmichaud | well, it just means that r28627 is the first point where we can see the problem. | 16:52 | |
| (which might be exactly what NotFound++ said :-) | |||
| okay, there's a bug in Str.pir. | |||
| fixing. | |||
| actually, before I do that.... | 16:53 | ||
| NotFound | What I say not always maps directly to what I try to say, I lack an english compiler with good warnings ;) | 16:55 | |
|
17:02
Khisanth joined
|
|||
| NotFound | pmichaud: probably unrelated, but have you looked at my patch in #39930 ? | 17:07 | |
| pmichaud | looking. | 17:10 | |
| +1 # NotFound++ | 17:12 | ||
|
17:27
purl joined
|
|||
| japhb | ouch | 17:34 | |
| ww | |||
| cognominal | how can I test that a vlue is undef in nqp? | 17:39 | |
| pmichaud | might have to use inline PIR. Parrot doesn't have a convenient method-based form. Or, we could perhaps create a defined operator. | 17:40 | |
| NotFound | cognominal: Are you looking at #56252 | ||
| ? | |||
| cognominal | nope, why the question? | 17:41 | |
| NotFound | I'm reviewing that patch, but I don't know how to add a pct test for the condition. Looks related to your question. | 17:42 | |
| pmichaud | we just need to check if scope is empty string | 17:43 | |
| NotFound | Yes, but I'm unable to understand even the existing tests in t/compilers/pct/past.t ;) | 17:47 | |
| pmichaud | I think the tests in t/compilers/pct/past.t just make sure the library loads and other sanity checks. I don't think they actually exercise pct. | 17:49 | |
| For that we've been using the nqp tests, primarily. | |||
| NotFound | That problem apart, the patch looks good and pass all tests. | ||
| This perl6 one-liner show it: $ ./perl6 -e'say $undefined; ---> Scope not found for PAST::Var '$undefined' | 17:51 | ||
|
17:52
cotto_work joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | yes, but if a scope is specified, we should indicate the scope being searched for. | 17:53 | |
| NotFound | I don't read the discussion mentioned in the ticket, but looks like the scope is unspecified. | 17:55 | |
| pmichaud | sometimes the scope is unspecified, yes. | ||
| sometimes it's specified. | |||
| NotFound | Mmmmm... then it looks like the have_scope branch needs a different handler. | 17:57 | |
| pmichaud | no, we just need a smarter error message | ||
| here, I'll fix it. | 17:58 | ||
| dalek | r28669 | pmichaud++ | trunk: | 18:00 | |
| : [pct]: | |||
| : * Fix "Scope not found" error message (RT#56252) | |||
| : * Based on patch courtesy Moritz Lenz <moritz@casella.verplant.org> moritz++ | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=28669 | |||
| Zaba | what does rt stand for? and does it stand for anything? | 18:03 | |
| purl :/ | |||
| Whiteknight | rt? | 18:04 | |
| oh, purl quit | |||
| he's the worst | |||
| Infinoid | rt.perl.org | ||
| Zaba: it stands for Request Tracker | 18:05 | ||
| NotFound | www.parrotcode.org/resources.html calls it: "Parrot Issue Tracker - The Parrot Bugtracking System". The relation to the RT acronym is not very clear in that page ;) | 18:06 | |
| pmichaud | NotFound: submit a patch? ;-) | 18:07 | |
|
18:07
wknight8111 joined
|
|||
| NotFound | I need to read the page about web patches first ;) | 18:08 | |
| pmichaud | afk, lunch. | ||
| but, before I go... anyone know how to determine if $P0 is a PMCProxy ? | 18:09 | ||
| davidfetter | bon appetit | ||
|
18:09
Ivatar joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | i.e., given $P0 = get_class <something> --- I want to know if $P0 is a PMCProxy | 18:09 | |
|
18:11
Zaba joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | (but not a subclass of PMCProxy) | 18:11 | |
| lunchtime | |||
| cognominal | bon appƩtit. | 18:14 | |
| French rƩbus : Ga. | 18:15 | ||
| which gives: G grand a petit | |||
| that is J'ai grand apƩtit. | 18:16 | ||
| davidfetter | he | 18:18 | |
| +h | |||
| DietCoke | pmichaud: $S0 = typeof $P0; if $S0 == "PMCProxy" ... | 18:19 | |
| as opposed to "isa" which will probably tell you if it's a subclass. | 18:20 | ||
| pmichaud | DietCoke: yes, that works, but we've had to overload the 'name' vtable entry for P6object | 18:34 | |
| so it's not super-clean. | |||
|
18:35
Whiteknight joined
|
|||
| dalek | r28670 | pmichaud++ | trunk: | 18:44 | |
| : [rakudo]: | |||
| : * Fix problem with 'sprintf' method appearing in wrong namespace. | |||
| : * Oddly, the problem appeared because running 'perl6.pir' gave | |||
| : different results (an exception) from running 'perl6.pbc'. I | |||
| : have no clue why the difference existed. | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=28670 | |||
|
18:46
jjore joined
|
|||
| dalek | r28671 | pmichaud++ | trunk: | 18:53 | |
| : [rakudo]: | |||
| : * Fix ranges on incrementing strings (e.g., 'A'..'BK') | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=28671 | |||
|
19:16
barney joined
19:20
Zaba joined
|
|||
| cotto_work | all of the tests in t/stm/basic.t are failing | 19:42 | |
|
19:48
Zaba_ joined
19:50
cjfields joined
|
|||
| nopaste | "cotto" at 131.107.0.101 pasted "test failures with r28671" (15 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/13374 | 19:53 | |
| bacek | morning everyone. | 20:12 | |
|
20:18
Zaba joined
|
|||
| NotFound | cotto_work: all test pass for me. | 20:47 | |
| cotto_work | wierd. lemme try a fresh checkout | 20:49 | |
|
20:54
rdice joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | in gdb, how can I determine the name of a sub (given that I know its PMC address?) | 20:58 | |
| ohhhhhhhhhh shoot. | 20:59 | ||
| never mind. | |||
| cotto_work | NotFound, all tests pass now | ||
| NotFound | cotto_work: did you make a realclean? | 21:00 | |
| cotto_work | yes | ||
| jhorwitz | pmichaud: if you happened to find out how to do that, let me know! | ||
| pmichaud | I just figured out why lexicals aren't working right for me. :-( | 21:01 | |
| at least, I _think_ I figured it out. | |||
| unfortunately, I have little clue how to fix it. | 21:02 | ||
| when compiling perl6.pbc from perl6.pir, perl6.pir does a .include of the various src/gen_*.pir files | 21:03 | ||
| this includes the actions and the grammar (gen_actions.pir and gen_grammar.pir) | 21:04 | ||
| each action corresponds to a regex in the grammar -- i.e., it has the same name as the corresponding grammar regex | |||
| i.e., there are two subs with identical names in the compiled source (although they're in different namespaces) | |||
| but when there's a lexically nested sub, as would be the case for any nested blocks within an action method, it simply says :outer('name_of_method') | 21:05 | ||
| but in this case, there are two .subs with that name | |||
| jonathan | ...it chooses the first one it finds, even if it's from a different namespace? | ||
| pmichaud | jonathan: I don't know how it chooses | 21:06 | |
| jonathan | Most likely, the first one. ;-) | ||
| pmichaud | but I can definitely demonstrate that _block49 is grabbing the wrong :outer | ||
| i.e., it's not getting the :outer it should. | |||
| (I don't know what :outer it's getting, but it's not the correct one.) | 21:07 | ||
|
21:08
ruoso joined
|
|||
| NotFound | pmichaud: Is that related to the sprintf pbc/pir problem? | 21:08 | |
| jonathan | pmichaud: I've found the bit of code that's doing this - it is, as I guessed, just picking the first one with a matching name, regardless of namespace. | 21:09 | |
| if (STREQ(sub->name, unit->outer->name)) { | 21:10 | ||
| pmichaud | NotFound: I'm not sure what was up with the pbc/pir problem. that one was totally bizarre. | ||
| I wonder what happens with a :multi ? | 21:11 | ||
| jonathan: where's the bit of code located? | 21:13 | ||
| NotFound | Maybe the problem is that compiling pir has undesired side effects, like importing things to main or hll namespaces. | ||
| jonathan | compilers/imcc/pbc.c | ||
| Search for find_outer in there. | |||
| pmichaud | any quick thoughts about how to fix this? Or should I just compose a message to the list? | 21:15 | |
| jonathan | Give me ten mins to try and hack something up | ||
| pmichaud | okay. I'm not sure that searching for the same namespace is always the correct solution, either. | 21:16 | |
| jonathan | Yeah | ||
| I'ts not | |||
| Hmm | |||
| Inner namespace? | |||
| { my $a = 42; class Foo { method x { $a } }; say Foo.new.x | 21:17 | ||
| pmichaud | yeah, that's a good example. | ||
| jonathan | Right. | ||
| Is "outer must be in same namespace or an enclosing namespace" good enough or is there a counter-example for this too? | |||
| pmichaud | well, I'm still worried about the case of :multi | 21:18 | |
| what I'd really like to do is to be able to give every sub a unique id and then let :outer refer to it, instead of its name. | |||
| jonathan | Would it be hard to emit :outer(['The' ; 'Sub' ; 'We' ; 'Want' ]) | 21:19 | |
| To make explicit to outer exactly which sub we're talking about? | |||
| pmichaud | oh, I can emit pretty much anything. | ||
| but how do I distinguish one :multi from another? | |||
| jonathan | Hmm. Ouch. | 21:20 | |
|
21:20
bacek joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | thus I'd like a unique id | 21:20 | |
| it only has to be unique within a compilation unit | |||
| or some other property on a sub that can be set at compile time | |||
| jonathan | I think best is to hit the mailing list, I think this needs Allison's input. | ||
| pmichaud | then we could search through the list of subs and find the one with the matching property | ||
| okay, I'll hit mailing list. This is a big roadblock for passing lots of tests at the moment. | 21:21 | ||
| (and it also affects $_ handling) | |||
| jonathan | Ouch. | ||
| OK, I can look into implementing the solution that is agreed upon. | |||
| pmichaud | good. so far this has only taken up eight hours of my time. :-| | 21:22 | |
| although I think that I can now write a short test case. | 21:23 | ||
| NotFound | pmichaud: as a relax, you can take a quick look at #56262 ;) | 21:25 | |
| jonathan | At least the eight hours led to an understanding of what's wrong. | 21:26 | |
| pmichaud | yes. | ||
| NotFound: I wonder what they mean by "current character set". | 21:28 | ||
| NotFound | pmichaud: according to the current state, nothing. | 21:29 | |
|
21:36
bacek_ joined
|
|||
| NotFound | I wrote that ticket because I think the issue must be solved before any other work in strings, charset and encodings. | 21:37 | |
| pmichaud | I think that mandelbrot shouldn't assume that the value coming back is a byte. | ||
| NotFound | pmichaud: yeah, but what cab be the correct way? | 21:38 | |
| pmichaud | although it works fine now... so what needs to change in chr? | ||
| NotFound | If the opcode must be not changed, his documentation must be. | ||
| pmichaud | yes, I think we just get rid of "in the current character set", since there is no such beastie. | 21:39 | |
| NotFound | But if it returns something intended only for plain byte usage, maybe the name 'chr' os misleading. | 21:41 | |
| s/os/is | 21:42 | ||
| pmichaud | it doesn't return something intended only for plain byte usage | ||
| the name 'chr' means "give me the string character corresponding to a codepoint" | |||
| and that's what the current opcode does | |||
| we might want to have a separate opcode that says "give me a fixed_8 string with this byte/these bytes" | 21:43 | ||
| although that sounds like a method/function to me. | |||
| japhb | +1 on the method/function version | ||
| pmichaud | i.e., not every operation needs to be an opcode. :-) | ||
| japhb | I don't see that that operation warrants an opcode | ||
| But it can still be useful for ... OpenGL. Because dangit, everything comes back to that. | 21:44 | ||
| :-) | |||
| (A typical way an OpenGL application would display a string in a given (western) font is to use special entry points that look up every byte in a string in an array of instructions of how to draw each character) | 21:45 | ||
| Of course, there are two-byte and four-byte variants, but I'm not sure that most OpenGL variants will handle them efficiently. | 21:46 | ||
| NotFound | I'm not sure, maybe the way to go is to drop the charset specification in strings, asserting that the charset is always unicode and different encodings for it. | ||
| pmichaud | I think that pdd28 might already do something like this. I haven't read it in great detail. | 21:47 | |
| NotFound | pdd28 looks very confusing to me. | 21:48 | |
| "Parrot was designed from the outset to support multiple string formats: multiple character sets and multiple encodings. We donāt standardize onUnicode internally, converting all strings to Unicode strings..." | 21:51 | ||
| moritz | nothing wrong so far, IMHO | ||
| NotFound | This is the part that can be changed: we can standarize on unicode charset without converting to a certain encoding. | 21:52 | |
|
21:54
GeJ joined
|
|||
| japhb | NotFound: explain how this works in more detail, please ... my immediate reaction was "How will that mess with strings that contain non-standard characters" and "What exactly does it mean to standardize on a charset without an encoding? Just that 'any Unicode encoding, but no non-unicode encoding'?" | 21:55 | |
| moritz | NotFound: that would imply handling byte data as non-strings | 21:56 | |
| NotFound: and it relies on the perception that all encodings are unicode compatible (ie you can have lossless round-trip conversions). Don't think that's the case, actually | 21:57 | ||
| japhb | moritz: I agree with your thinking on the latter comment. On the former comment, has Parrot addressed Perl 6's Buf/Str dichotomy yet? | ||
| NotFound | japhb: the intention will be to make impossible the existence of a string with non-standard characters. | 21:58 | |
| japhb | (It happens that I'm about to face this problem with my OpenGL stuff, for at least the NCI portions of the problem) | ||
| NotFound: In that case, we very much need to have a parallel set of operations on opaque buffers. | |||
| moritz | japhb: I think it's addressed in the charset pdd, but it's a long time since I last read it | 21:59 | |
| pmichaud | part of the point of pdd28 will be to provide a fixed-width encoding for most of Parrot's strings. | ||
| moritz | pmichaud: for those that are considered unicode, right? | 22:00 | |
| NotFound | japhb: we already have that, the latin-1 is used in that way. | ||
| japhb | And again, I agree with moritz that Unicode does not imply lossless round-trip to any other charset. In particular: what about current Unicode and *the next release of Unicode*. Such a round trip could not be lossless without relaxing the stricture. | ||
| pmichaud | moritz: I don't know that we're limiting that statement to unicode | ||
| NotFound | japhb: but we don't need that, all that is needed is a mapping to any other charset, from unicode, that is, take it as an encoding. | 22:01 | |
| s/from/to | |||
| moritz | pmichaud: ok, makes sense - I'm just not really familiar with non-unicode charsets | ||
| pmichaud | I don't know that parrot plans to natively support much beyond the unicode charset | 22:02 | |
| (other charsets might be available via libraries, though.) | |||
| NotFound | By the way, pdd28 states wrongly that utf16 is fixed length. | ||
| japhb | NotFound: so let's say you're working on the next (as yet unreleased) version of the Unicode standard, using Parrot. How would you do that? How would you encode characters from a future version of Unicode, that aren't standardized in the version of Unicode that your Parrot was built to support? | ||
| pmichaud | that's worth a message to the list. | ||
| moritz | that is incorrect indeed | ||
| ucs2 is fixed width, but it's nto a complete unicode encoding | 22:03 | ||
| NotFound | japhb: what the current code does is to let the work to external libraries for certain operations, that does not need to be changed. | 22:04 | |
| japhb | NotFound: that assumes A) that we guarantee said external libraries to exist in all Parrots (at least starting at Parrot 1.0), and B) Their edge case behavior is the edge case behavior we want. | 22:05 | |
| (And I don't know the plans on either) | 22:06 | ||
| NotFound | But we don't need a complete support in the lower levels, we just need to be sure to not put obstacles to it. The current state have a lot ot them. | 22:09 | |
| moritz | NotFound: it's the old "flexibilty vs. quick (partial) success" discussion | 22:11 | |
| NotFound: many perl 5 hackers know the pain that a broken string concept implies, and try very, very hard to provide a solid, general solution | 22:12 | ||
| NotFound | For example, even if many people may want to be able to write identifiers in his native language, surely to expect that subroutine lookups will take into account all case, normalizations and composed stuff is too much. | ||
| moritz | NotFound: so the goal is to have a really flexible system, although it will take some time to implement (and other approaches could be quicker, but probably not as general) | ||
| NotFound: re "is too much" - why? because no other language does it currently? | 22:13 | ||
| it's at least a good idea to have the hooks in place - for example the perl 6 regex engine needs all that magic anyway | 22:14 | ||
| and to do it fast, it has to be done at the low level, which means in parrot itself | |||
|
22:14
apeiron_ joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | indeed, this is one of the big reasons I chose to write the regex engine in PIR instead of C -- I wanted to leave the unicode and string handling to Parrot. | 22:15 | |
| moritz | and once you have all that stuff, you can just as well use it for sub calls on the PIR level | ||
| NotFound | moritz: it can be done, but it implies to have all unicode information available inside the interpreter. | ||
|
22:15
kid51 joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | Parrot is expected to understand unicode, yes. | 22:15 | |
| Currently it does this by linking to ICU; that may or may not be the permanent solution. | |||
| moritz | NotFound: well, that can lazily be loaded - if it's not needed, it doesn't need to be loaded | ||
|
22:16
Theory joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | right now for systems w/o ICU I've been doing small workarounds in the unicode.c file. | 22:16 | |
| (the hard one to manage is case conversion.) | |||
| NotFound | pmichaud: and as you said before, too much hacks makes difficult to fix things later. | ||
| pmichaud | that's not exactly what I said. :-) | 22:17 | |
| I said that hiding the bugs makes it difficult to find and fix them later. | |||
| in this case the workarounds are fairly explicit, and all conditioned on the HAVE_ICU flag. | |||
| moritz | rm unicode.c # reveal all unicode related bugs related to not having ICU | ||
| pmichaud | and they aren't really workarounds as much as providing missing functionality. | ||
| nopaste | "pmichaud" at 76.183.97.54 pasted "finally(!) able to reproduce the lexicals bug." (63 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/13376 | 22:19 | |
| NotFound | Well, I don't have a strong opinion about the issue of dropping the charset part, but I'm almost sure that the strings, charsets and encodings needs more clarification before having a lot of 'legacy' issues. | 22:21 | |
| pmichaud | away from irc for a bit while I compose a long :outer message. | 22:23 | |
|
22:24
ank joined
22:37
Limbic_Region joined
|
|||
| Limbic_Region | Hey, is perl6.exe building for anyone else using Win32/Cygwin? | 22:38 | |
| it is still working fine in Win32/MinGW but Cygwin blows up - not sure if it is a known issue as I haven't been following things for the last few days | 22:39 | ||
| japhb | Limbic_Region: Would you mind testing a cygwin patch for OpenGL for me? | 22:42 | |
|
22:43
bacek joined
|
|||
| Limbic_Region | japhb - if it doesn't require me to think - I am brain dead | 22:43 | |
| oh, and for anyone interested in the Cygwin build issue of perl6.exe - I can zero in on the build that broke it if it would help (anyone?) | 22:44 | ||
| japhb | I don't think it does, assuming you have OpenGL set up for cygwin ... it's the June 18 patch (the later one) attached to RT #55978 ( rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=55978 ) | ||
| Limbic_Region | checking if I have OpenGL or not - I think I did earlier for some cool colored box demo | 22:46 | |
| but I don't use it regularly | |||
| japhb | nodnod | ||
| Limbic_Region | ok, I have it - not current, but it worked at one time | 22:47 | |
| should I update or test with what I have? | |||
| japhb | Another cygwin user created the first version of the patch, but chromatic asked for changes, and I haven't been able to get a cygwin user to test the fixed version of the patch. | ||
| I don't think it really matters ... as long as you have the header files installed (gl.h and glut.h) | 22:48 | ||
| Limbic_Region | I am fairly sure either particle or jonathan have cygwin too - but they don't admit it | ||
| japhb | heh | ||
| Limbic_Region | ok - which patch am I applying and then what am I doing to test/verify? | 22:49 | |
| japhb | parrot-opengl-cygwin-2008-06-18.patch | ||
| Limbic_Region | duh | 22:50 | |
| I see that now | |||
| japhb | You should be able to Configure, make, and then run: | ||
| ./parrot examples/opengl/triangle.pir | |||
| and | |||
| ./parrot examples/opengl/shapes.pir | |||
| Limbic_Region | give me a few | ||
| japhb | (And not have them explode, but rather display something) | ||
| np | |||
| thank you! | |||
| moritz observes again that windows sucks as a development platform | 22:51 | ||
| when I first switched to linux I was disappointed by many things - but I coud just run gcc $file without worrying too much about pathes and stuff | 22:52 | ||
| it just worked | |||
|
22:52
bacek joined,
kid51 joined
|
|||
| japhb | Linux (especially linux/386) is remarkably forgiving to coders. Enough that porting from that to anything else is just a world of hilarity. | 22:53 | |
| "All the world is not a VAX." | |||
|
22:53
teknomunk joined
|
|||
| bacek | morning everyone | 22:54 | |
| Limbic_Region | moritz - Win32 doesn't suck as a development platform if you are developing for Win32 - it has a very self-centric view of the world | 22:55 | |
| moritz - but I think the same could be said of *nix | |||
| moritz | Limbic_Region: it sucked for me before I even knew about linux - but maybe that was just me ;-) | 22:56 | |
| japhb glares at glGetString, and then says in the Darla voice from Finding Nemo, "WHY ARE YOU NOT WORKING?!?" | |||
| Limbic_Region | moritz - well, unless you are a .NET or C# developer - downloading MS's devloper toolkit - MSVC++ etc - you are hosed | ||
| Darla - you mean Dory? | 22:57 | ||
| japhb | Darla, the "Fish Killer" girl with braces | ||
| Limbic_Region | oh, yeah | ||
| <---------- brain dead | |||
| parrot is building now | |||
| japhb | cool | ||
| Limbic_Region | after that, I will isolate what build caused perl6.exe to stop building on Cygwin | 22:58 | |
| japhb | nod | ||
| Limbic_Region | triangle.pir works and is cool | 22:59 | |
| japhb | yay | ||
| and shapes.pir? | |||
| Limbic_Region is still mesmerized | 23:00 | ||
| yes, very cool | |||
| japhb | excellent | ||
| Thank you muchly. | |||
| moritz | Limbic_Region: I was talking about the ol' days where you couldn't download MSVC++ for free | ||
|
23:00
jimk joined
|
|||
| Limbic_Region | moritz - yeah. I don't develop on Win32 myself but I was making a similar comment to one of the BizTalk developers in my shop | 23:00 | |
| he looked at me like I was speaking a foreign language | 23:01 | ||
| he then proceeded to tell me how wrong I was | |||
| moritz | ;) | ||
| Limbic_Region | and I realized, if you take a M$ point of view, it is a perfect development platform | ||
| moritz would like to continue this dicussion, but has to go to bed :/ | |||
| Limbic_Region | japhb - you should apply that patch - very cool | ||
| sleep well | 23:02 | ||
| japhb | Limbic_Region: working on it. | ||
| Limbic_Region | isn't parrot -V supposed to report the build rev? | ||
| dalek | r28672 | japhb++ | trunk: | 23:07 | |
| : [OpenGL] Better cygwin support, courtesy of donaldh++ | |||
| diff: www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=28672 | |||
| japhb | I thought that went away because of problems with non-SVN developers | ||
| Limbic_Region | *shrug* - was just trying to figure out what rev I was at to get a starting point for the binary search | 23:21 | |
| it appears that perl6.exe failed somewhere between 28575 and 28600 | |||
| but I need to double check that | |||
| since I did a realclean in languages/perl6 | |||
| it may have just been a cleanup issue | 23:22 | ||
| Limbic_Region further investigates | |||
| yep, I am pretty sure all it needed was a realclean in languages/perl6 - I wonder if that's the issue OS X 10.4 PPC | 23:27 | ||
| jimk | Limbic_Region: No, I'm very diligent about doing make realclean. Problem is that until now I have rarely gone into the languages directories and called 'make perl6' -- particularly on my slow iBook. | 23:28 | |
| Limbic_Region | ah | 23:30 | |
| I hadn't followed the thread - as I am not an OS X | |||
| user | |||
| japhb - if there are any pending cygwin patches, email me the RT IDs - Joshua.Gatcomb@gmail.com | 23:34 | ||
| japhb | Limbic_Region: I don't think there are any more from me. Checking ... | 23:35 | |
| Limbic_Region | I just meant in general | ||
| japhb | ok | 23:40 | |
| Limbic_Region | I like to contribute in whatever way I can since I don't actually develop code | 23:42 | |
| if that means testing patches because everyone else is sane enough not to use cygwin, then so be it | 23:43 | ||
|
23:50
cjfields joined
23:51
cjfields_ joined
|
|||
| japhb | Limbic_Region: :-) | 23:57 | |
| Limbic_Region++ # Taking one on the chin for the rest of us | 23:58 | ||
|
23:59
Theory joined
|
|||