|
www.parrot.org/ | Parrot 1.4.0 "Mundo Cani" Released! Set by moderator on 21 July 2009. |
|||
| dalek | nie: r79 | Bradley.Sif++ | trunk/.gitignore: Added a .gitignore file for those folks using git-svn. Presumably will |
00:15 | |
| Tene | bkuhn: to do OO stuff in pynie properly, i need to be able to override :vtable('invoke') | 00:20 | |
| bkuhn | Tene: Which feature of Python's OO system needs that? (I know that's a very basic question, but the answer will help me understand Parrot's vtable system, which I don't yet. ;) | 00:22 | |
| Tene | bkuhn: to instantiate an object of class Foo, you do it like: | 00:23 | |
| f = Foo() | |||
| so you either need: | |||
| 1) The parser detects type names and generates different code for class instantiation | |||
| which is awkward, and I don't like it | |||
|
00:24
AndyA joined
|
|||
| Tene | or 2) You override 'invoke' for pynie class objects | 00:24 | |
| bkuhn | ah, yes, this makes sense. | ||
| Tene | which is correct, IMO | ||
| bkuhn | I agree with you that (2) is preferred. | ||
| Tene | you can't override invoke in PIR classes in parrot right now. You will be able to after pcc_rewiring branch | ||
| Whiteknight | you can't triple stamp a double stamp | 00:31 | |
| Tene | That... looks like words. | ||
| Whiteknight | Tene: pcc_rewiring won't make that work immediately, just makes it possible | ||
| Tene | Whiteknight: Okay, sure. | ||
| Whiteknight | will take additional work to make invoke DTRT | ||
| Tene nods. | 00:32 | ||
| dalek | nie: r80 | Bradley.Sif++ | trunk/ (2 files): Lambda expressions do not form closures properly unless 'newclosure' pir opcode Closes Launchpad Bug #407838 |
00:40 | |
| TT #896 created by jimmy++: [patch]consting socket_win32.c | 01:23 | ||
|
01:32
TiMBuS joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r40369 | whiteknight++ | trunk (3 files): [TT #895] some fixes to the new experimental code. Some bad pointer arithmetic was causing segfaults when I test these. Fix some problems, not all. |
01:32 | |
|
01:48
JimmyZ joined
01:51
sekimura joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r40370 | NotFound++ | trunk/src/exceptions.c: [cage] add some comments and minor fixes to r40363 additions, JimmyZ++ |
02:23 | |
| ttbot | NotFound: Parrot trunk/ r40370 MSWin32-x86-multi-thread make error tt.ro.vutbr.cz/file/cmdout/63430.txt | 02:27 | |
| NotFound | Oh, my fault, sorry. | 02:29 | |
| I definitely must not commit nothing when I'm almost sleeping :O | 02:30 | ||
| Whiteknight | yeah, I have that same problem :() | 02:32 | |
|
02:35
janus joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r40371 | NotFound++ | trunk/src/exceptions.c: [cage] fix C90 violation, ttbot++ |
02:36 | |
| rrot: r40372 | whiteknight++ | trunk/src/gc (2 files): [TT #895] If I had a dollar for every typo, I could afford to quite my job and work on Parrot full-time (where I would make even more typos, and thus, more money). This new attributes allocator now passes all tests that I have thrown at it locally |
02:40 | ||
| NotFound | Whiteknight: I attached a patch to TT #895 with the current state. Pass all tests except the random packfilefixupentry failures. | 02:41 | |
| Enough for today :O | 02:42 | ||
| Whiteknight | oh awesome | ||
| I want to do some benchmarks, I think this new GC allocator could speed things up pretty considerably | 02:43 | ||
| NotFound | I doed an attempt with your allocator, but crasehd. I see that you already fixed several things. | ||
| Whiteknight | yeah, it passes all tests I've done so far | 02:44 | |
| I think we can replace most calls to mem_sys_allocate with the new allocator for big speed savings | |||
| NotFound | I'd like to give it another try, but I'm too tired. Goddnight. | ||
| Whiteknight | yes, goodnight | ||
|
03:03
abesapien joined
03:29
theory joined
03:31
tetragon joined
03:41
JimmyZ joined
04:15
Andy joined
04:34
jdv joined
|
|||
| cotto | when imcc dies, I'm not going to miss its crappy line misnumbering | 04:57 | |
| dukeleto | is there a way to reverse a string in an S register or do I need a String pmc? | 05:05 | |
|
05:14
jan joined
|
|||
| cotto | I don't see an opcode for it. | 05:28 | |
| You'll probably need to use the pmc's method. | 05:29 | ||
| dalek | rrot: r40373 | petdance++ | branches/depends: Andy's branch to work on dependency building |
05:41 | |
|
05:45
abesapien joined,
JimmyZ joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r40374 | petdance++ | branches/depends/config/gen/makefiles (2 files): first stab at getting makedepend working |
05:51 | |
|
06:57
quek joined
07:26
JimmyZ joined
08:39
mberends joined
|
|||
| dalek | kudo: f76b3c7 | masak++ | src/builtins/ (2 files): [src/builtins] some PIR simplifications |
08:49 | |
| kudo: e89cc1e | masak++ | src/parser/grammar.pg: [src/parser/grammar.pg] aligned more with STD.pm JimmyZ++ for the patch. |
|||
|
09:05
MoC joined
09:39
flh joined
10:13
bacek joined
|
|||
| bacek | o hai | 10:19 | |
|
10:36
quek left
10:40
quek joined
10:45
mikehh_ joined
11:06
clinton joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r40375 | bacek++ | branches/keys_cleanup/src/pmc/addrregistry.pmc: [pmc][cage] Remove AddrRegistery.get_pmc_keyed. It's unused and broken. |
11:27 | |
| rrot: r40376 | bacek++ | branches/keys_cleanup (2 files): [cage] Drop KEY_iterator_FLAGS. It's not used anymore |
|||
|
11:28
abesapien joined
11:31
AndyA joined
11:36
kid51 joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r40377 | bacek++ | branches/keys_cleanup/src/key.c: Fix marking next key in key_next. bacek-- for stupid mistake in "if" rewrite. |
11:37 | |
|
11:37
bacek_ joined
|
|||
| nopaste | "mikehh" at 90.209.201.180 pasted "PATCH for src/gc/mark_sweep.c to pass codetest" (42 lines) at nopaste.snit.ch/17452 | 11:45 | |
| mikehh_ | src/gc/mark_sweep.c FAILed t/codingstd/c_function_docs.t and t/codingstd/linelength.t | 11:47 | |
| kid51 | Ah!, you answered my question before I asked it! | 11:48 | |
| mikehh_ Did you apply for a commit bit yet? | 11:49 | ||
| mikehh_ | my printer is not working yet - so I am waiting to submit a CLA - I do it tomorrow I hope | 11:53 | |
| dalek | rrot: r40378 | jkeenan++ | trunk/src/gc/mark_sweep.c: [codingstd] Applying patch submitted by mikehh for line length and c function docs. |
11:54 | |
| bacek | mikehh++ | 11:56 | |
|
11:58
joeri joined
12:00
Whiteknight joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r40379 | bacek++ | branches/keys_cleanup/include/parrot/key.h: [docs] Add little bit of description of KEY_flags. |
12:07 | |
| tracwiki: v3 | bacek++ | KeysRefactor | 12:12 | ||
| tracwiki: Scrap initial KeysRefactor</a> idea. | |||
| tracwiki: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/KeysRe...ction=diff | |||
| bacek | good localtime Whiteknight | 12:21 | |
| Whiteknight | hello bacek | 12:22 | |
| how are you doing today? | |||
| bacek | Great. I just scrapped another idea how to make parrot better :) | 12:23 | |
| Anyone working on PARROT_EXPORT/PARROT_API separation? | 12:28 | ||
| dalek | rrot: r40380 | whiteknight++ | trunk/src/gc (2 files): [TT #895] Some more cleanups to the fixed-size allocation thing. Also, add two new functions to the GC API to act as mem_sys_allocate/mem_sys_free replacements in some situations. |
12:31 | |
| ttbot | whiteknight: Parrot trunk/ r40380 i386-linux-thread-multi make error tt.ro.vutbr.cz/file/cmdout/63842.txt | 12:33 | |
| bacek | mj41++ # ttbot rulez! | 12:35 | |
| Whiteknight | it is a nice bot | 12:36 | |
| (except when it's pointing out my mistakes) | |||
| not_ttbot | Whiteknight: U BROK BUILD IN r40380!!! | 12:38 | |
| Whiteknight | yeah I know, fixing it now | ||
| I built and ran tests BEFORE I saved my changes to the file | 12:39 | ||
| NotFound | Whiteknight: hello, I'm playing with the attribute allocator | ||
| Whiteknight | NotFound: It's still rough, but should be alright most of the time | 12:40 | |
| NotFound | Whiteknight: main problem is that it doesn't zero initialize. | ||
| bacek | Whiteknight: consider to learn git. You can hide some of your mistakes :) | ||
| Whiteknight | NotFound: can add that easily. You want it? | ||
| dalek | rrot: r40381 | whiteknight++ | trunk (4 files): [TT #895] fix some problems caused by typos in my last commit |
12:41 | |
| NotFound | Whiteknight: that's debatable, but I think that having them zero initializes avoid the need to do that in init and init_pmc in a lot of cases. | ||
| bacek getting popcorn and waiting for ttbot :) | |||
| Whiteknight | NotFound: I'll add it now for PMC attributes. It's trivial | 12:42 | |
| There are two interfaces to the allocator: one for PMC attributes (that will zero-initialize) and one for other structures (that won't) | 12:43 | ||
| bacek | msg mj41 Can you add link to coverage report into TapTinder "Bookmarks"? | ||
| purl | Message for mj41 stored. | ||
| NotFound | I'm seeing that the initial context is created before the initialization of the gc subsystem. Bad smell to me. | 12:54 | |
| Whiteknight | NotFound: what do you mean? | 12:55 | |
| NotFound | In inter_create create_initial_context is called before Parrot_gc_initialize | 12:56 | |
| dalek | TT #897 created by bacek++: Review test coverage and add more tests or deprecate unused functionality. | ||
| Whiteknight | hmmm, yes, that is weird | 12:57 | |
| dalek | rrot: r40382 | kjs++ | trunk/compilers/pirc/src/pircompiler.h: Add a STRING pointer to lexer which will temporarily be used for storing STRINGs that are created inthe lexer. Once PIRC is completely changed to use StRINGs instead of C strings, it can be stored in yylval union in the parser. |
13:35 | |
|
13:35
kj joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r40383 | whiteknight++ | trunk/src/gc (3 files): [TT #895] initialize PMC attribute structures on suggestion from NotFound++. Cleanup some unused structure fields. |
13:39 | |
| Whiteknight | and now it's time for breakfast | ||
| bacek | Yay! kj welcome back :) | ||
| kj | thanks bacek :-) | ||
| that was my first commit from my mac | |||
| bacek feeling guilty | 13:40 | ||
| I'm going to predate pirc in favour of PCT-based PIR compiler. | 13:41 | ||
|
13:43
tetragon joined
|
|||
| bacek | Just because I dislike "pure C" very much... | 13:43 | |
| kj | what's predate? | 13:45 | |
| dalek | rrot: r40384 | kjs++ | trunk/compilers/pirc/src (2 files): store the STRING created by the lexer in the temporary sval field in the lexer struct. Once PIRC has been converted, it can be stored in yylval->sval, but for now, we need to duplicate this functionality using STRINGs instead of C strings |
13:46 | |
| bacek | kj: I've got few local changes to bring pirc up-to-date with "modern" pir (but they are very "raw") | 13:47 | |
| kj | pirc, or pct-based pir compiler? | ||
| bacek | pirc | ||
| kj | has pir changed? | ||
| i wasn't aware of any syntactical changes | |||
| bacek | "pir" by it self - not. | ||
| kj | what kind of changes? | 13:48 | |
| bacek | But something like ".tailcall" was introduced recently | ||
| kj | pirc has that | ||
| .tailcall exists quite some time already i think | |||
| no? | |||
| bacek | My copy of PCT PIR has that too :) | ||
| kj | pir.y:1887 | 13:49 | |
| (line) | |||
| i havent been away *that* long ;-) | |||
| bacek | ~6 month is something like "forever" :) | 13:50 | |
| kj | haha yes | ||
| well havent been away, but just lurking | |||
| bacek | And there is "full functional" Packfile PMCs now to implement emitting PBC from PCT PIR. | 13:51 | |
| kj | cool | ||
| bacek | (We just need "SerializebleSub" for finish it) | ||
| kj | eh, so the PBC generating stuff, where is that? | ||
| cause pirc's bc generator is almost complete, except for some bits here and there which has bugs, esp. with STRING and NUM constants | 13:52 | ||
| bacek | t/pmc/packfile*.t | ||
| pirc doesn't support Keys afaiu. | |||
| kj | that could be yes | 13:53 | |
| well, complex keys | 13:54 | ||
| simple keys should work | |||
| i remember seeing it working | |||
| bacek | Many parts of parrot relying on "complex keys"... | 13:55 | |
| github.com/bacek/pir/tree/master | |||
| kj | pirc doesn't support syntax like "pf = new ['Packfile'] | 13:56 | |
| " | |||
| bacek | There is my changes to original PIR compiler. Any objections/thoughts/ideas? | ||
| (At github) | |||
| NotFound | Unfurtunately packfile pmc tests stills fails randomly at least on amd64 builds. | 13:57 | |
| bacek | NotFound: yak... How "randomly"? | ||
| NotFound | bacek: sometimes they fail, sometimes don't. I think it may depend on tidal waves or something. | 13:58 | |
| kj | sorry not really familiar with github ... takes a while | 13:59 | |
| bacek | NotFound: I suspect hash keys order and GC... | ||
| kj: github isn't trivial. But I'm still waiting for commit access to /languages... | 14:00 | ||
| NotFound | Whiteknight: have you commited some debugging messages in the allocator? | 14:01 | |
| kj | seems alright to me. i'm not familiar with all pge syntax, like ":: [" in sub_def | ||
| bacek | "::" is for block backtracking | 14:04 | |
| Just premature optimisation. | 14:05 | ||
| Oh... It's tomorrow already... | 14:07 | ||
| bacek must sleep | |||
| purl | $bacek->sleep(8 * 3600); | ||
| bacek | good night | 14:08 | |
| JimmyZ | night bacek | 14:09 | |
|
14:22
HG` joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r40385 | NotFound++ | trunk/src/interp/inter_create.c: [core] initialize gc subsystem before contexts and pio |
14:30 | |
|
14:41
kj joined
|
|||
| Whiteknight | NotFound: I may have. | 14:44 | |
| dalek | rrot: r40386 | whiteknight++ | trunk/src/gc/mark_sweep.c: [TT #895] remove an errant debugging message that I committed last time. Thanks NotFound++ |
14:47 | |
| rrot: r40387 | NotFound++ | trunk/t/src/extend.t: [t] put check for interpreter before his usage |
|||
|
14:54
Psyche^ joined
15:07
bkuhn joined
|
|||
| bkuhn | Hey, I want to check if a register contains a sub. What's the recommended method for checking that? | 15:10 | |
|
15:16
Zak joined
|
|||
| NotFound | What's the last test in t/src/extend.t trying to check? He's creating two main interpreters, which is explictly forbidden in several docs. | 15:17 | |
| dalek | rrot: r40388 | NotFound++ | trunk/t/src/extend.t: [t] flush stdout before potential crashes |
15:21 | |
| cotto | bkuhn, from C or PIR? | ||
| bkuhn | cotto: PIR, but I think I figured it out: typeof $P50, $P26 | 15:22 | |
| $P50 will have "Sub" if it's a sub | |||
| s/it's/$P26/ | |||
| cotto | yeah, as long as you're not worried about subclasses | ||
| bkuhn | cotto: subclasses of "Sub" ? | 15:24 | |
| Is there a better way? I sort of want to know if something is "callable" | |||
| dalek | rtcl: r563 | coke++ | trunk/runtime/builtin/binary.pir: Convert sub-dispatch to a switch. use .const for options setup. |
15:26 | |
| cotto | I'd expect there to be a pmclass declaration for that, but it looks like there isn't. | 15:28 | |
| something like "pmclass Sub does sub need_ext" | |||
| That's a little surprising. | |||
| Coke | . | 15:32 | |
|
15:44
JimmyZ joined
|
|||
| dalek | TT #898 created by cotto++: r40313 introduces a memory leak | 15:50 | |
|
15:51
Zak joined
16:02
mberends joined
|
|||
| NotFound | cotto: I don't see the problem in #898. The vtable created becomes the reponsability of whichever calls for it. | 16:04 | |
| mikehh | codetest FAIL, All others PASS (pre/post-config, smolder, nqp_test, fulltest) at r40388 - Ubuntu 9.04 i386 | 16:09 | |
|
16:13
theory joined
|
|||
| dalek | rrot: r40389 | NotFound++ | trunk/src/gc/mark_sweep.c: [cage] missing ASSERT_ARGS |
16:15 | |
|
16:41
Whiteknight joined
16:48
kid51 joined
17:25
HG` joined
|
|||
| Coke | bah. heredocs don't work inside macros. | 17:50 | |
|
17:54
hudnix joined
|
|||
| dalek | kudo: c57fbd7 | moritz++ | t/spectest.data: [t/spectest.data] remove a test that was merged; add a few newly passing tests |
17:55 | |
| kudo: ed636b8 | moritz++ | t/spectest.data: one more passing test file, KyleHa++ |
|||
| TT #899 created by coke++: heredocs in a macro argument broken. | 18:18 | ||
| rrot: r40390 | jkeenan++ | trunk/src/gc/api.c: [codingstd] Adjust documentation so that all functions pass c_functions test. |
18:21 | ||
|
18:32
quek left
|
|||
| dalek | rdinal: 550139a | (Joeri Samson)++ | (2 files): Respect $, when joining, and set $, when cardinal starts |
18:33 | |
| rdinal: a61bd4b | (Joeri Samson)++ | src/classes/Array.pir: Fill array with nil values when assigning to an index > length |
18:34 | ||
|
18:53
chromatic joined
19:20
tetragon joined
19:30
desertm4x joined
19:39
MoC joined
19:51
joeri left
20:22
kid51_at_dinner left,
kid51_at_dinner joined
20:27
asciiville joined
|
|||
| mikehh | All tests PASS (pre/post-config, smolder, nqp_test, fulltest) at r40390 - Ubuntu 9.04 i386 | 21:15 | |
|
21:25
iblechbot joined
|
|||
| Tene | Is there anyone around willing to review a patch to add a 'poll' method to the socket pmc? | 21:31 | |
|
21:53
dukeleto joined
|
|||
| dalek | rtcl: r564 | coke++ | trunk/runtime/builtin/string.pir: Use .const sub to declare the list of options |
22:01 | |
|
22:10
dukeleto joined
22:15
bacek joined
22:20
chromatic joined
|
|||
| Tene | purl: msg pmichaud I'm having trouble putting non-rakudo objects into a hash because of src/classes/Pair.pir:55, which calls .item() on the value. | 22:23 | |
| purl | Message for pmichaud stored. | ||
|
22:31
dukeleto joined
|
|||
| Tene | purl: msg pmichaud I can't do @a>>.foo() for any method that returns non-parrot objects because !dispatch_method_parallel calls .'Scalar'() on the return value of the method. | 22:33 | |
| purl | Message for pmichaud stored. | ||
|
22:37
nillo joined
22:38
rg1 joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | Tene: noted | 22:43 | |
| Tene | pmichaud: do you know if there's a reason that src/setting/IO/Socket/INET.pm adds an additional $.listener attribute instead of reusing $!PIO from src/setting/IO/Socket.pm ? | 22:44 | |
| pmichaud | I don't know if there's a reason, no. | 22:45 | |
| Tene | Okay. | ||
| pmichaud | would it be that the listener socket needs to be separate from the one that does the normal comms? | 22:46 | |
| Tene | I'll investigate a bit more and then commit the fix later tonight. | ||
| No, it shouldn't be. | |||
| pmichaud | how would INET.pm reuse $!PIO, ooc? | 22:50 | |
| japhb | pmichaud: did you give any further thought to the Parrot modules landscape? You mentioned wanting to tank on our general idea a bit .... | 22:54 | |
| pmichaud | I haven't had a good opportunity to look at it further, no. I keep getting sidetracked by other "issues" | ||
| japhb | I was going to tease you about that, but I'm guessing you've probable gotten past the point that it's funny any more ... :-/ | 22:55 | |
|
23:16
mikehh joined
23:29
bacek joined
|
|||
| cotto | Is there a way that one PIR-level instruction can turn into two identical opcodes? | 23:47 | |
| treed | If each opcode does only half the job that the instr needs? | 23:52 | |
| treed is mostly talking out of his ass there. | |||
| dalek | rtcl: r565 | coke++ | trunk/runtime/builtin/string.pir: Convert a few helper subs to use hllmacros |
23:55 | |