|
New proposed #parrotsketch protocol: trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/Propos...chProtocol | Please prepost reports by 1800 UTC. | Logs: tinyurl.com/parrotsketch Set by moderator on 30 June 2009. |
|||
|
00:46
japhb joined
07:53
rin1024 joined
07:57
mikehh joined
08:17
Gerd joined
08:27
Gerd left
12:04
Whiteknight joined
14:33
pmichaud joined
14:59
rin1024__ joined
16:00
NotFound joined
|
|||
| pmichaud | Report for 2009-07-14: | 16:58 | |
| What I did: | |||
| * Rakudo now passing 11,784 spectests (+199 since last week) | |||
| * Worked on diagnosing and providing -G bug updates for rakudo | |||
| * Rakudo is no longer experiencing -G bugs | |||
| * MANY THANKS to all who helped with this, including bacek++, chromatic++, Infinoid++, NotFound++, Whiteknight++ | |||
| * Corrected handling of dynext in load library path | |||
| * Fixed a bug in the tracing runcore | |||
| * Worked on a patch to eliminate use of string comparisons for 'isa' testing | 16:59 | ||
| ** Provides an 11% speed improvement for rakudo spectests | |||
| ** Mostly works -- will send to mailing list for review and comment | |||
| * Added <?> and <!> to Perl6Regex syntax | |||
| * Removed deprecated methods and regexes from PGE | |||
| * Published instructions for building Rakudo releases | |||
| * Invited people to become Rakudo release managers | |||
| * Cleaned up rakudo code for some -G bug handling | |||
| * Lots of long-term planning and brainstorming | |||
| What I didn't do that I said I would do | |||
| * I didn't work on build refactor for Parrot (to look like install tree) | |||
| * I've decided I'm not really the person to be leading this | |||
| * I did send my plan to the mailing list | |||
| * Hopefully someone else can/will pick up the ball | |||
| What I'm doing this week: | |||
| * Finishing HLL interop docs and tasks | |||
| * A few PCT and NQP improvements | |||
| * Various improvements to Rakudo (Vienna.pm Rakudo Day) | |||
| * Working on Hague grant | |||
| ** redesign of operator precedence parser | |||
| * Updating presentations for OSCON and YAPC::EU | |||
| What I'm blocking on: | |||
| * Insufficient waking hours | |||
| EOR | |||
|
17:06
mikehh joined
|
|||
| NotFound | What I did: | 17:07 | |
| * Closed some old RT tickets. | |||
| * Cleaned some 'might be clobbered' warnings seeen with --optimize. | |||
| * Miscellaneous cage cleaning and fixing. | |||
| * Talked a lot on irc ;) | |||
| What I'm doing: | |||
| * Looking at exception handling and related problems. | |||
| EOR | |||
|
17:08
darbelo joined
|
|||
| Whiteknight | # What I Did Last Week | 17:09 | |
| - Created a new "Infinite Memory" GC core as a template that new GC hackers can follow and learn from | |||
| * (Thanks for suggestion from Coke++ and Austin++) | |||
| * Used the new core to find problems with GC core encapsulation (TT #828) | |||
| - Tracked down the root cause of the abort-before-exit error that is plaguing Rakudo | |||
| * (Thanks for help from Allison++, chromatic++, and pmichaud++ on that!) | |||
| * Suggested a potential fix and waiting for feedback (TT #833) | |||
| - Fixed error where "exit 1" didn't change Parrot's exit value | |||
| - Wrote some assorted function-level documentation | |||
| - Built LLVM and Clang, and updated PLATFORMS with information. | |||
| # What I'm Doing This Week | |||
| - Hopefully (finally) getting io_cleanups locked down and merged (Infinoid++ for his help!) | |||
| - Taking lessons learned from the context_pmc branch and writing up a task list for continuing that work | 17:10 | ||
| - Testing for the release | |||
| - Doing some deprecation stuff that can be merged post-release. | |||
| # What I'm Blocking On | |||
| - Tuits | |||
| darbelo | Report for this week is on the blog: www.parrot.org/content/week-decnum-dynpmcs. | 17:35 | |
| cotto | # What I did: | 17:58 | |
| * more opsc work, basically understanding what ops2c does and where various functionality should go in opsc | |||
| * lots of syncing with bacek++ | |||
| * also started work on runcore-independent post-past ops processing | |||
| # What I hope to do and how many tuits I expect to have: | |||
| * nothing external | |||
|
18:02
chromatic joined
|
|||
| chromatic | Working on pluggable, encapsulated runcores. | 18:03 | |
| Will continue to work on them this week. | |||
| Won't enable them by default by 1.4, but may add a compile-time flag to enable pluggability. | |||
| Will work on weird bugs for the release as necessary, prioritizing those instead of runcores. | |||
|
18:07
Util joined
|
|||
| Util | # Done: | 18:09 | |
| * Worked heavily on #691 (installed pbc_to_exe can't find config.fpmc.) | |||
| - After being Coke and cautioned me against an `is_installed` approach, I got it working via `cc_inc` changes in the fpmc build. | |||
| - Allison's new code (r39993, r39995, r40038, r40039), uses the `is_installed` approach as a short-term fix. | |||
| - Even though the issue is resolved, my code will move us toward the longer-term install strategy, so I am re-working my code to fit with Allison's. | |||
| ( My fault for not checking the SVN updates. ++Allison ) | |||
| - Candidate patch by tomorrow. | |||
| * Closed #717 (parrot_config segfaults when invoked with the --dump option); | |||
| - Plan to open related ticket to fix or deprecate Parrot_io_write. | |||
| * Reviewed Parrot_io_write, Parrot_io_puts, and print_warning for deprecability. Still in progress. | |||
| * Reviewed S02 and related tests for clarity. Still in progress. | |||
| # Plan for next week: | |||
| * Finish #691 | |||
| * Kill off Parrot_io_write | |||
| * P5toP6 tinkertoy progress | |||
| # Blockers: | 18:10 | ||
| * Marathon of Harry Potter movies 1..5 running at local cinemaplex. | |||
| * Even so, medium Tuit harvest expected. | |||
| .end | |||
|
18:16
allison joined
|
|||
| Tene | Last week: last week: wrapped a gui lib in Parrot, got some basic windows displayed, working on OO interface for it | 18:19 | |
| this week: More gui, blog post, curses | |||
| blocking: I have some work pending on OO for pynie, but that requires :vtable('invoke'), which is blocking on pcc refactor | |||
| Which I heard was scheduled to come in shortly after 1.4 | |||
| allison | - Ticket queue work, especially install-related tickets, preparing for release. | 18:27 | |
| - Fixed pbc_to_exe so it works from an installed parrot. Tested on Pynie and Tcl. | |||
| - Plan to build Debian and Ubuntu packages this week to make sure we have no issues for 1.4. | |||
| EOR | |||
|
18:27
moritz joined
|
|||
| cotto | hi | 18:31 | |
| Util | hi | ||
| moritz | hello birdmonks | ||
| darbelo | hola | ||
| Whiteknight | hello | ||
| allison | hi | ||
| we've lost our handy channel topic with the link to the new procedure | 18:32 | ||
| cotto | q1q | ||
| allison | has everyone preposted their reports? | ||
| Whiteknight | yes | ||
| NotFound | hola | ||
| moritz | allison: no, I can see it; maybe an irc server messup | ||
| allison | moritz: could be | 18:33 | |
| Util | in irssi, it is cut off at 'prepost repor' | ||
| cmd /topic to see all | |||
| moritz | anyway, the link is trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/Propos...chProtocol | ||
| allison | and the log of reports is irclog.perlgeek.de/parrotsketch/2009-07-14 | 18:34 | |
| let's start with questions, then roadmap review | 18:35 | ||
| cotto | |||
| cotto | I'm drafting a message to parrot-dev about the release. Is Saturday a good cut-off point for any disruptive changes? | 18:36 | |
| (at which point we can focus on testing HLLs, platforms, etc) | |||
| Whiteknight | it's good for me | ||
| allison | yes, for a packaged release that's a good amount of time | ||
| cotto | eoq then | ||
| allison | other questions? | 18:37 | |
| NotFound | I have a few | ||
| Whiteknight | I have one too | ||
| NotFound | TT #826 Deprecate Parrot_str_free? | ||
| chromatic | Reluctantly yes, with the caveat that it is *not* the problem with Rakudo. | 18:38 | |
| allison | NotFound: go ahead and put in a deprecation notice, that still leaves us free to keep it if someone needs it | 18:40 | |
| NotFound | Ok. | ||
| allison | Next q from NotFound? | 18:41 | |
| NotFound | Second question: What to do with exceptions thrown from :load or :init blocks? Let them propagate out of imcc, or catch them an abort compiling/loading? | ||
| allison | let them propagate | ||
| NotFound | s/an/and | ||
| Whiteknight | this is along the same lines as my question | ||
| allison | I mean, if nothing catches them, they'll end execution anyway | 18:42 | |
| Whiteknight | (not exactly the same) | ||
| NotFound | allison: the problem is when someone catches then. | ||
| Whiteknight | it's the inferior runloops problem | 18:43 | |
| Check out TT #833 for a good example and analysis of it | |||
| NotFound | Forgettting the runloop issues for a now, it lets the module semi-loaded and will be rare that the caller knows how to repair it. | ||
| Whiteknight | problem stems from an exception in a child runloop being handled by code that had been running in a parent runloop | ||
| allison | we don't want a scenario where it's impossible to cleanly handle any exception thrown by an embedded parrot | 18:44 | |
| allison looking at ticket | |||
| Whiteknight | There are a few good ways I think we can resolve this issue once and for all, but we need to pick the best from the available options | ||
| NotFound | allison: I tested a way to handle the issue: returnning an error code from the fixup routines, checking it in the compiler calls, and throw an exception here where appropiate. | 18:45 | |
| Whiteknight | a dual-stage exception would work in that case, yes | 18:46 | |
| but that requires the scheduler to know which runloop a handler is associated with, and to "rethrow" the exception if it's not currently in that runloop | |||
| allison | I like the "continuing in the same runloop" idea, but it doesn't work for general cases of we're calling a chunk of PIR code from within a chunk of C code | ||
| Whiteknight | you're right, it doesn't | 18:47 | |
| so are we looking at disallowing cross-runloop exception propagation, or dual-stage exception throwing? | |||
| allison | what we need is better context cleanup with exception handlers | ||
| chromatic | Disallowing cross-runloop propagation seems sensible and necessary. | 18:48 | |
| allison | chromatic: except that it leaves us with a crippled exception system | ||
| Whiteknight | There is a difference between PIR called from C inline, and PIR called from C that can be appended into the current runloop however | ||
| allison | minimizing the number of runloops is certainly a plus | 18:49 | |
| Whiteknight | We could disallow exception propagation for the strict inline cases only | ||
| pmichaud | I don't understand "disallowing cross-runloop exception propagation" | ||
| NotFound | I think we just need to disallow resume. | ||
| pmichaud | if the PIR that I'm compiling throws an exception, my eval() function (in PIR) needs to be able to catch it. | ||
| allison | Whiteknight: yes, the cases that could be scheduled instead of immediately executed are essentially tail calls | ||
| Whiteknight | pmichaud: in the case we saw where there were two runloops on the stack, an exception thrown from the "child" runloop can't be handled by a handler registered with the "parent" runloop | 18:50 | |
| allison | Whiteknight: the C could couldn | ||
| pmichaud | Whiteknight: I think that's not workable. | ||
| allison | 't depend on the return value | ||
| Whiteknight | allison: exactly my thinking, we could use the same tailcall mechanisms | ||
| pmichaud: I think it can be in limited situations | |||
| chromatic | We're getting a long way from priorities and scheduling into implementation here. | ||
| allison | pmichaud: it's not | ||
| Whiteknight | okay, can we continue this discussion in #parrot? | ||
| allison | chromatic: good point, we can keep talking about this on #parrot | 18:51 | |
| pmichaud | fine with me | ||
| NotFound | Fine | ||
| Whiteknight | okay. That satisfies my question too | ||
| moritz has a question on behalf of bacek | 18:52 | ||
| chromatic | Go ahead. | ||
| moritz | any objections to merging tt761_keys_revamp branch into trunk? | ||
| pmichaud | before the release? | ||
| moritz | I mean before the release, and if there's no black smoke | ||
| allison | moritz: is it needed before the release? | ||
| moritz | allison: I'm not entirely sure, but I don't think it's too urgent | 18:53 | |
| allison | moritz: let's do it right after, then | ||
|
18:53
mikehh joined
|
|||
| chromatic | It improves a lot of grotty code, on the plus side. | 18:53 | |
| allison | moritz: make sure you have in deprecation notices for any API changes | 18:54 | |
| moritz | allison: I'll pass that on to bacek++ | ||
| cotto | I'd like to see it in 1.4 for that reason, but it's not urgent | ||
| pmichaud | as long as rakudo builds and passes all spectests, I have no strong objection. | ||
| chromatic | I'd rather support clean code than the mess we have now. | ||
| pmichaud | I'll give the branch a try with rakudo and see what I get. | ||
|
18:55
webnov8 joined
|
|||
| allison | we're still getting reports on parrot-dev of failing tests on various platforms | 18:55 | |
|
18:55
webnov8 left
|
|||
| allison | avoiding the "rush to fix at the last minute before the release" is definitely good | 18:56 | |
| moritz | afaict they are all the same tests; bacek thinks they rely on hash order where they shouldn't (I haven't checked that) | ||
| pmichaud | queue 1 item from me | ||
| moritz doesn't mind either way, just wanted to bring up the topic | |||
| chromatic | pmichaud? | 18:57 | |
| pmichaud | I'll be putting this in an email to parrot-dev, but I again want to express my appreciation to everyone who helped excise the -G errors from Parrot for Rakudo | 18:58 | |
| I had some doubts as to whether it would be done in time for the 1.4 release, but you all came through in fantastic fashion | |||
| so, thanks. | |||
| (and yes, I'm not seeing any more -G related errors for the past several days now) | |||
| endofitem | 18:59 | ||
| allison | NotFound: did we finish all your questions? | ||
| and IIRC, Whiteknight had one | |||
| (then I'll hand off the rest to chromatic) | 19:00 | ||
| Whiteknight | my question was answered | ||
| chromatic | Alright, let's do milestone review. | 19:01 | |
| #1 install -- I've seen some pbc_to_exe patches. What's the status and what needs to happen there? | |||
| NotFound | allison: yes | ||
| allison | pbc_to_exe now works, tested with pynie and tcl | ||
| needs testing with other languages | |||
| Util | My pbc_to_exe upcoming patches are refactorings, and not critical to actual install. | 19:02 | |
| chromatic | What else is necessary to make a language work from an installed Parrot? Dynops? Dynpmcs? | ||
| pmichaud | after I do the hll stuff on my plate, I'll give pbc_to_exe a try. | 19:03 | |
| or I can reverse the priority of those two items -- you can choose. | 19:04 | ||
| allison | chromatic: I think we resolved those issues for partcl | ||
| chromatic | Anything else for installation? | ||
| pmichaud | have we been able to test partcl with any of the platforms identified as problems with the rakudo ins branch? | 19:05 | |
| allison | pmichaud: what were the platforms? | ||
| pmichaud | I don't remember off the top of my head -- they're in RT and in the message I sent, though. | ||
| basically it was issues in passing the appropriate link options on those systems | |||
| because parrot's defaults didn't work there | |||
| allison | pmichaud: will look them up | 19:06 | |
| pmichaud | (I'm finding them now.) | ||
| chromatic | Oh right, you can't have a space in one of the options on Windows, I think. | ||
| pmichaud | and you *have* to have a space on some other platform. | ||
| allison | chromatic: the install process refactor (making the build tree look more like the install directories) will wait until after 1.4 | 19:07 | |
| pmichaud | RT #66558, #66560, #66574 | 19:08 | |
| chromatic | Are we on track to meet the spirit of the goal anyway? | ||
| allison | thanks, patrick | ||
| pmichaud | #66560 is likely a Rakudo problem and not a Parrot one | 19:09 | |
| allison | chromatic: I'd say so. Will try to knock down as many install tickets as possible before Saturday | ||
| pmichaud | #66574 may be also -- just related to Rakudo's "different" approach to trying to build the dynpmcs | 19:10 | |
| chromatic | #2 -- HLL interoperability. | ||
| pmichaud | but 66558 is definitely an issue | ||
| I think we're well enough along on HLL stuff that we can consider ourselves to be in good shape for this (more) | 19:11 | ||
| I'm expecting to tighten up some of the specs and clean a few things up, but we at least have enough HLL interop taking place now that we can claim to be supporting HLL interop with only a few hiccups | 19:12 | ||
| I'll make sure any existing open tickets are addressed by Friday morning. | |||
| chromatic | #3 -- I asked jhorwitz about this, and he's making progress. I'm not sure it'll land by the release however. | 19:13 | |
| That's the external API. | |||
| He wanted to have a draft by last weekend. | |||
| allison | #3 is a spec target, rather than an implementation target? | ||
| if so, the critical bit is deciding if we need any deprecation notices in 1.4 | |||
| chromatic | Right. | 19:14 | |
| pmichaud | my feeling was that we originally intended #3 to be an implementation target. | ||
| I'm fine if it's a spec target, but people are already asking about external API stuff. | |||
| NotFound | We have some documentation and examples that works. | 19:15 | |
| allison | pmichaud: aye, and it's already possible to embedd/extend parrot, but people need clear guidance (i.e. documentation) on what is and isn't part of the API | ||
| pmichaud | I thought part of the milestone was also reviewing PARROT_EXTERN and PARROT_API markers. | 19:17 | |
| chromatic | It was. | ||
| NotFound | Time to resurrect PARROT_API? | ||
| allison | yes, we switched to PARROT_EXPORT to make it clear that that flag was just meant to provide what various platforms need | ||
| chromatic | I mailed jhorwitz about the deprecation notices. | ||
| pmichaud | right, but we were also intending to have PARROT_API markers | 19:18 | |
| allison | with plans to add PARROT_API once we defined which functions were part of it | ||
| yes | |||
| NotFound | And will be good to have some test that verifies that all PARROT_API marked functions are documented as external api, and viceversa. | 19:19 | |
| allison | the deprecation notice there would be relevant to embedders, basically "in the future, any function not marked with PARROT_API isn't intended for use in embedding or extensions" | ||
| chromatic | Right. | 19:20 | |
| pmichaud | works for me. | ||
| allison | sounds good, and thanks chromatic for contacting jhorwitz | ||
| pmichaud | can I pass a long a list of functions that Rakudo is currently relying on as candidates for PARROT_API ? | 19:21 | |
| *along | |||
| allison | yes, very helpful | ||
| chromatic | Do we need to add any more priorities? | 19:23 | |
| allison | we're good for 1.4 | ||
| for 2.0, do we want to break down the list by month? | 19:24 | ||
| or, keep it as a 6 month priority list? | 19:25 | ||
| chromatic | Avast! Monthly. | ||
| allison | okay, we can break that down next week | 19:26 | |
| chromatic | Any other questions? | ||
| Tene | 1 | 19:27 | |
| allison: is pcc refactor still scheduled to land shortly? | |||
| allison | after 1.4, yes | 19:28 | |
| Tene | Thanks. | ||
| I'm done. | |||
| chromatic | Okay, thank you all. | 19:29 | |
|
19:29
moritz left,
Util left
19:31
chromatic left,
NotFound left,
pmichaud left
19:33
PacoLinux left
19:34
eternaleye joined
19:52
darbelo left
20:52
ascent joined
21:28
Whiteknight joined
|
|||