Perl 6 language and compiler development | Logs at colabti.org/irclogger/irclogger_log/perl6-dev | For toolchain/installation stuff see #perl6-toolchain | For MoarVM see #moarvm
Set by Zoffix on 27 July 2018.
pmurias how should I bump NQP? 11:23
nine gently ;) 11:28
pmurias is there a tool to that (or is just putting the commit name from git describe) ok? 11:29
[Tux] Rakudo version 2019.07.1-370-g168c9c2fb - MoarVM version 2019.07.1-246-g44811cab6
csv-ip5xs0.831 - 0.834
csv-ip5xs-206.639 - 6.758
csv-parser23.988 - 24.095
csv-test-xs-200.423 - 0.425
test7.225 - 7.763
test-t1.729 - 1.758
test-t --race0.873 - 0.907
test-t-2030.237 - 30.358
test-t-20 --race9.045 - 9.761
11:41
nine pmurias: I usually put the git describe output into NQP_REVISION. I think there's also an IRC bot that can do it for you, but I've never bothered to find out which and how 11:48
AlexDaniel nine: no irc bot, just this: github.com/perl6/z 13:59
pmurias: colabti.org/irclogger/irclogger_lo...-10-03#l72
tellable6 AlexDaniel, I'll pass your message to pmurias
AlexDaniel kawaii: can you take a look into the installed/ dir? I wanna see the new log for DB::Xoos github.com/rakudo/rakudo/issues/32...-537982717 15:09
patrickb . 16:16
MasterDuke jnthn: i was thinking of only adding the ^compose message to the method-not-found exception if one of the suggested methods was equal to the tried method 17:22
vrurg Looking for an advise. Working on a problem described in R#2694. The case itself is kinda handled in RoleToRoleApplying, but by simple testing for the same attribute object. It doesn't work this way because attribute in a ParametricRole is generic. It is instantiated when role is concretized. Hence, two concrete roles get two different attribute objects for the same attribute. What would be a good way to make sure two objects are the same attribute? I'm 17:26
considering objectid of the initial attribute + type of instantiated attribute.
synopsebot R#2694 [open]: github.com/rakudo/rakudo/issues/2694 [roles] Role consumption by multiple roles
AlexDaniel vrurg: if you can at least confirm that it's a regression that'd be wonderful 20:41
vrurg: if it's not, just file a ticket for them and we can move on 20:42
if it is, well… then we'll have to figure it out 20:43
like bisect it and whatnot
vrurg AlexDaniel: confirmed and noted in the ticket. 22:28