|
6macros: discussing the finer points of Perl 6 macros, Qtrees, and how to stay sane | irclog: irclog.perlgeek.de/6macros/today Set by moderator on 28 July 2015. |
|||
|
01:48
ilbot3 joined
03:56
vendethiel joined
06:50
FROGGS joined
06:55
Ven joined
07:18
Ven joined
09:06
Ven joined
10:09
Ven joined
13:15
Ven joined
13:48
Ven joined
14:14
Ven joined
14:24
Ven joined
14:41
Ven joined
14:55
Ven joined
14:57
Ven joined
15:18
Ven joined
15:45
Ven joined
15:48
Ven joined
|
|||
| Ven | mmh, obviously, ident-expr can't use identifier | 16:08 | |
| that's an issue | |||
| actually, I probably can | 16:10 | ||
| "['<' <-[>]>+ '>']? " wat? | |||
| masak | why couldn't it? | 16:17 | |
| oh, that's for operators, like 'infix:<+>' | 16:18 | ||
| Ven | ah, ok | ||
| well, it fails with "Variable 'a:' is not declared" | |||
| even though I use <identifier>, only <term:identifier> should do that. uh.. | 16:19 | ||
| aaah, ok, I get it. | |||
| my str-expr uses <expr> | |||
| but, <identifier> will eat the | |||
| ":"... | 16:20 | ||
| masak | yeah... | ||
| that sounds wrong | |||
| maybe the ':' should go inside the [] | |||
| Ven | and I can't use <term:str> directly :| | ||
| masak | hold on, let me test a patch for that | ||
| no, but you can refactor term:str to call <str>, and then use that :) | 16:21 | ||
| Ven | that's done already | 16:24 | |
| masak | then you can use <str>, no? | 16:25 | |
| Ven | yeah :-) | ||
| moar indirection! | |||
| it's not java, so I'm not gonna call it an abstraction... ;) | 16:26 | ||
| (yes, cheap shot, I know) | |||
| masak | :P | ||
| I've already heard a lot of Java bashing today at work, so yours kind of pales in comparison :) | 16:27 | ||
| Ven | :) | ||
| masak | here you go. github.com/masak/007/commit/e82621...f1daef242d | 16:28 | |
| Ven | ok 1 - {} | 16:32 | |
| ok 2 - {"a": 1} | |||
| ok 3 - {a} | |||
| Q::Identifier.new(name => "a") | |||
| ok 4 - {a : 1} | |||
| guess I'll just have to stuff that .name, like a savage? :D | |||
|
16:33
FROGGS joined
|
|||
| Ven | wtf. I lost my code | 16:33 | |
| amazing... | 16:34 | ||
| wtf is git doing | 16:36 | ||
| it's trying to hook up the diff on parens | 16:37 | ||
| but you removed it | 16:38 | ||
|
16:40
vendethiel joined
|
|||
| Ven | ok. {a: 1} parses. | 16:45 | |
| not to the right thing, probbly | |||
| it certainly pretends to.. | |||
| git threw my stash away. ok | 16:47 | ||
| I give up for today. Fuck git. | 16:48 | ||
| git reset --hard 783e628 | 16:52 | ||
| HEAD is now at 783e628 Fix conflicts with c8783f2bc07c62f7c7d16322d638cac8a7ccc5d6 | |||
| what kind of drugs.. | |||
|
18:06
vendethiel joined
|
|||
| vendethiel | [23:31] <masak> the $.key attribute will sometimes be a Q::Literal::Str and sometimes a Q::Identifier, that's all | 18:07 | |
| sometimes a function | |||
|
18:44
baldemar joined
19:43
vendethiel joined
19:57
Ven joined
|
|||
| Ven | okay, I'm gonna try again. Rewrite this things | 19:58 | |
| masak | oki | 20:04 | |
| I'm here, nearby | |||
| Ven | actually, it refactored my code... it works like that... wut. | 20:05 | |
| vendethiel | my internet doesn't, tho.. | 20:08 | |
| I don't get how the tests can work though.. | 20:15 | ||
|
20:15
Ven joined
|
|||
| Ven | > '{a: 1}' '(object (property (int 1) (int 1)))' | 20:22 | |
| Test.pm is totally fine with that | |||
| I need to teach him more about property, maybe? | 20:24 | ||
| oooh, it uses .Str, doesn't it... | |||
| yay \\o/ | 20:25 | ||
|
20:35
Ven joined
|
|||
| Ven | make Q::Property.new(Q::Literal::Str.new(~$<identifier>), | 20:40 | |
| $<identifier>.ast); | |||
| looks a bit ugly.. | |||
| so. | 20:45 | ||
| masak | sorry, got distracted by $stuff :) | 20:47 | |
| looks OK to me | |||
| Ven | oke :) | 20:49 | |
| I just need to go about method, then | |||
| no idea on that one. Seems like Q::Statement::Sub won't do (as I had guessed) | |||
| sometimes I think perl6 should've done away with "class"es :P | 20:52 | ||
| well, parsing "{a}" with { <identifier> } works (yeah of course) | 21:09 | ||
| but parsing "{a()}" with { <identifier> '()' } doesn't (token OR rule) | |||
| I'll sleep on that one | |||
| masak | hm | 21:41 | |
| I don't see offhand why that wouldn't work | |||