6macros: discussing the finer points of Perl 6 macros, Qtrees, and how to stay sane | irclog: irclog.perlgeek.de/6macros/today
Set by moderator on 28 July 2015.
03:49 vendethiel joined 06:35 FROGGS joined 07:23 Ven joined 09:18 Ven joined 10:39 Ven joined 12:13 Ven joined 12:30 Ven joined
masak fully expects Ven to notice that he just pushed some (minor) stuff to 007 12:58
I'm cleaning up so that I can start from a passing test suite before I finish up the AST strengthening refactor 12:59
Ven no, I'm too much with the students
masak oh. in that case, enjoy :) 13:00
Ven hhe 13:01
hehe*. make it green, refactor, and now, make it red.ooff you go
off*
I've been doing ASM for the last 3 days, so don't expect any clever high-level insight from me 13:02
(not that you should expect 'em any other day, though...)
masak usually I have trouble keeping up with you. might be good for me that you've been doing ASM for a while :P 13:04
Ven oh, I'm sure you know far more that me in TT :) 13:11
I know nothing of topology theory
I'll go back to writing APL once I've done enough ASM...
masak is reminded of where he is with the refactor: *one* test currently (inexplicably) fails 13:13
Ven x86_64 is really... 13:22
"VFMADDSUBPS", "FYL2XP1", "AESKEYGENASSIST", or even "vbroadcastf128".
sigh.
3.6k pages (Intel manual). 13:23
masak that sounds... like the opposite of types and macros, actually 13:34
Ven :D 13:35
it's REALLY unityped. only numbers.
masak and no scoping 13:36
my remaining failing test is scoping-related
Ven well, *some* scoping
pushq %rbp could be considered scoping...
(unless you're one to like -fomit-frame-pointer)
(also, you've seen I can't keep up with myself at the SPW :)..) 13:37
masak :P 13:38
Ven I'm still very unsure about what I think about "small packages" in perl6-lang 16:13
(if it looks like I'm talking here because #perl6 is "too common", it's just that I'm far too confused myself to explain it clearly...)
16:25 FROGGS joined
masak not sure what you're referring to 16:38